Group 1 - HydrometerAnalysisLabReport
Group 1 - HydrometerAnalysisLabReport
Group 1 - HydrometerAnalysisLabReport
College of Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
Submitted By:
Group No. # 1
Submitted To:
Engr. Adrian M. Reyes
II. OBJECTIVES
● To determine the proportion of the soil particles smaller than 0.075mm (fine-
grained soils)
● To be able to plot the particle size distribution curve of the soil sample based on the
data obtained upon conducting the hydrometer analysis.
● To classify whether the soil sample is well-graded, poor-graded, or gap-graded.
III. METHODOLOGY
Materials:
Balloon
Sodium
Hexametaphosphate
Beaker Timer
2. Pour the distilled water into the graduated cylinder and fill the cylinder until it
reaches the mark. Note that the mixture of soil sample together with the solution of
sodium hexametaphosphate and distilled water will fill the graduated cylinder
exactly 1 liter.
3. Once 10 mins has passed, add the mixture of soil sample and the solution of sodium
hexametaphosphate into the graduated cylinder.
5. Using the palm of your hand, secure the top of the graduated cylinder covered with
a rubber balloon. Flip the graduated cylinder upside down and back upright for 1
minute. Make sure that the cylinder must be turned upside down roughly 30 times.
Sieve analysis cannot determine the particle size distribution of soil with a
considerable number of smaller particles (silt and clay). A common approach for
determining the distribution of soil particle sizes from the #200 (0.075 mm) sieve to around
0.001 mm is the hydrometer analysis.
Table 1 shows the calculation of the necessary data for the experiment based on the
recorded hydrometer reading. It can be observed that the hydrometer reading in the
conducted experiment decreases as the elapsed time increases. On the other hand, the value
of (K), 0.01332, was derived from the Table 4 Values of K for Use in Equation for
Computing Diameter of Particle in Hydrometer Analysis in the laboratory manual. Since
the specific gravity used for this specific experiment is 2.65 at 22 degrees Celsius, K is
equal to 0.01332. Additionally, the effective hydrometer depth (L) was based on Table 3
Variations of L with Hydrometer Reading - ASTM 153H Hydrometer. The value of
correction factor (Ct) was given on the Table 5 Temperature Correction Factors, where the
22-degree Celsius temperature corresponds to +0.40.
𝑳 (𝒄𝒎)
𝑫 (𝒎𝒎) = 𝑲√
𝒕 (𝒎𝒊𝒏)
𝟏𝟑.𝟏 𝒄𝒎 𝟏𝟑.𝟓 𝒄𝒎
𝑫𝟐 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟐√ 𝑫𝟏𝟓 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟐√ 𝟏𝟓 𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝟐 𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝟏𝟑.𝟑 𝒄𝒎 𝟏𝟑.𝟕𝟓 𝒄𝒎
𝑫𝟓 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟐√ 𝑫𝟑𝟎 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟐√
𝟓 𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝟑𝟎 𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝟏𝟒.𝟏 𝒄𝒎
𝟏𝟑.𝟒 𝒄𝒎 𝑫𝟔𝟎 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟐√ 𝟔𝟎 𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑫𝟖 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟐√ 𝟖 𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑫𝟔𝟎 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟔𝟓
𝑫𝟖 = 0.0172
sample in grams; the collected soil from the sieve analysis experiment was 25 grams.
𝑹𝑪 𝒙 𝒂
𝑷 = (100)
𝑾𝑺
where F200 denotes the percent finer of #200 sieve as a percent; the calculated percent
finer from the sieve analysis was 3.14%.
𝑷 𝒙 𝑭𝟐𝟎𝟎
𝑷𝑨 =
𝟏𝟎𝟎
Figure 1 represents the "Grain-Size Distribution Curve" based on the gathered data.
This graph illustrates the correlation between the percentage finer and the grain size (mm). In
order to plot this distribution curve, the calculated percent finer and the diameter is inserted to
the excel. The orange plotted section is from the previous sieve analysis experiment. On the
other hand, the blue plotted section represents the hydrometer analysis.
Hydrometer Analysis assesses the size of soil particles by measuring how quickly they
leave a liquid in suspension. It establishes the grain size distribution curve of samples that are
too tiny to be assessed using sieves. With the continuous stirring of soil samples mixed in a
solution with Sodium Hexametaphosphate in a given total time of 1 hour, including initial
readings, the group acquired the principal objective of determining the proportion of the soil
particles that are smaller than 0.075mm. Also, the group was able to illustrate the grain size
distribution of the soil sample by the obtained experimental data.
However, like any experiment, additional modifications are required to account for the
possibility of uneven mixing mistakes. Furthermore, issues such as improper measurement of
dispersion agents may alter the solution and impact the overall reading of the experiment. From
the performed experiment, a correction of +4 was added, given that the reading of -3 in the
Given those considerations and achieved data, it is evident that the group successfully
performed the hydrometer analysis experiment. As each group member understood the
efficient determination of particle size distribution in a soil sample, it is recommended to be
cautious of performing each specific procedure. It is necessary to take significant corrections
to attain precise results within the experiments.
VI. REFERENCES
Bowles, J. (1992). Physical and Geotechnical Properties of Soils (International Student Edition).
McGRAW-HILL, Inc. Retrieved from: (1) Bowles-Physical-and-Geotechnical-Properties-of-
Soils.pdf | Lukman Hakim - Academia.edu
VII. APPENDIX
Raw Data
𝟏𝟑.𝟑 𝒄𝒎 𝟏𝟑.𝟕𝟓 𝒄𝒎
𝑫𝟓 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟐√ 𝑫𝟑𝟎 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟐√
𝟓 𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝟑𝟎 𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝟏𝟒.𝟏 𝒄𝒎
𝟏𝟑.𝟒 𝒄𝒎 𝑫𝟔𝟎 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟐√ 𝟔𝟎 𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑫𝟖 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟐√ 𝟖 𝒎𝒊𝒏
𝑫𝟔𝟎 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟔𝟓
𝑫𝟖 = 0.0172
Individual Summary
MEMBERS CONTRIBUTION
● Appendix
Kenneth ● Preparation of the materials
● Organizing of the paper
● Methodology
JM ● Executes the procedure
● Preparation of materials