This item was submitted to Loughborough’s Institutional Repository

(https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/) by the author and is made available under the

following Creative Commons Licence conditions.

For the full text of this licence, please go to:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/
THE POTENTIAL USE OF BIM TO AID CONSTRUCTION
WASTE MINIMISATION

Zhen Liu, Doctoral Student, Z.Liu2@lboro.ac.uk

Mohamed Osmani, Senior Lecturer, m.osmani@lboro.ac.uk
Peter Demian, Lecturer, P.Demian@lboro.ac.uk
Andrew N Baldwin, Director of IMCRC, a.n.baldwin@lboro.ac.uk
Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11
3TU, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT
It is widely acknowledged that the construction industry has a major impact on the environment, both
in terms of resource consumption and waste production. The construction industry is responsible for
producing a whole variety of different onsite wastes; the amount and type of which depends on factors
such as the stage of construction, type of construction work, direct or indirect stakeholders’ design
change contribution, and practices throughout the project lifecycle. A number of construction waste
minimisation (CWM) techniques and tools are currently available to assist contractors to divert waste
away from landfill. However, literature reveals that there are insufficient techniques and tools for
reducing construction waste during the design and procurement stages. The last few years saw the
emergence of Building Information Modelling (BIM) techniques, which can be adopted to improve
sustainable construction performance. BIM is a maturing modelling philosophy, which has been
applied to several building-related functions such as visualising designs, automating quantity takeoffs,
checking compliance with regulations, and scheduling construction processes. Furthermore, BIM, as a
real-time interactive and collaborative communication system, has the potential to help project
stakeholders to collaboratively attain waste minimisation for sustainable construction and building
throughout design, construction and throughout the lifecycle by improving building construction
performance. Hence, this paper, which is part of an ongoing doctoral study, explores the potential
application of BIM to design out waste. An in-depth literature review was conducted to provide a
foundation for the doctoral study that aims to investigate the use of BIM as a potential platform for
building design waste minimisation. The paper explores construction waste origins and causes, current
waste reduction practices; examines current industry BIM practices and investigates BIM tools for
sustainable project construction and management; and identifies the knowledge gaps in existing
literature that pave the way for the subsequent data collection stages.

Keywords: Environmental impact, Sustainable construction, Construction waste minimisation

(CWM), Building Information Modelling (BIM), Designing out waste.

1. INTRODUCTION
Sustainability is becoming a major catalyst for change in the built environment owing to its ever
increasing energy consumption and material usage, which leads to waste and pollution. Waste
generated from construction and demolition (C&D) activities in the UK accounts for 32% of total
waste generation (WRAP 2011a). In addition, the last five years saw a striking increase in C&D waste
in the UK. Indeed, In C&D activities generated 90 million tonnes of physical waste in 2005 (Zakar
2008); while recent figures from WRAP (2011a) revealed that this has increased to 120 million tones.
Similarly, the current estimation of C&D waste disposed off to landfill is 40% (WRAP 2011a); whilst
it was 30% in 2005 (Edgar 2007). The UK Waste Strategy for England 2007 identified the
construction industry as a priority sector to move forward with the waste minimisation agenda (Defra
2007). Furthermore, the UK has set the ambitious target of zero construction waste to landfill by 2020
(WRAP 2011b). From a financial perspective, it has been estimated that the true cost of waste could as

Proceedings of the CIB W78-W102 2011: International Conference –Sophia Antipolis, France, 26-28 October
much as 10 times that of disposal (WRAP 2011a). Thus, the construction industry is under an ever-
increasing pressure to explore and develop effective and efficient techniques and tools to minimise its
escalating waste production. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to explore the extent of
the relationship between Building Information Modelling (BIM) and construction waste minimisation
(CWM). The review examined construction waste origins and causes, current waste reduction
practices; assessed current industry BIM practices, BIM tools for sustainable project construction and
management; and discussed the knowledge gaps in existing literature that pave the way for the
subsequent data collection stages of this ongoing research that will lead to the development of BIM
aided CWM framework.

2. CONSTRUCTION WASTE MINIMISATION (CWM)

CWM has been defined by the UK Environment Agency (1997) as reducing construction waste by
preventive measures (prevention, reduction at source, and reuse of products) and waste management
measures (quality improvement, and recycling). Similarly, Envirowise (1998) defined CWM as the
process of systematic waste reduction at source, by preventing and reducing waste before its physical
generation, and encouraging reuse, recycling and recovery. Therefore, CWM is a process which
avoids, eliminates or reduces waste at its sources or permits reuse and recycling of the waste for
benign purposes in construction (Riemer and Kristoffersen 1999).

2.1 CONSTRUCTION WASTE CAUSES AND ORIGINS

By and large, construction waste origins are related to design changes, leftover material scraps, no-
recyclable/re-useable packaging waste, design/detailing errors, and poor weather (Faniran and Caban
1998). Further, a study of attitudes of architects and contractors toward origins of construction waste
indicates that construction waste is related to design, site operation, procurement routes, material
handling and sub-contractor’s practices (Osmani et al. 2006). Osmani et al. (2007) went further to
compile and group the main sources of waste factors in terms of construction lifecycle stages,
comprising contractual, design, procurement, transportation, on-site management and planning,
material storage, material handling, site operation, residual, and other.

There is a consensus in literature that a significant portion of waste is caused by problems which occur
in stages that precede production, and design stage is one of the major construction waste sources
(Keys et al. 2000, Osmani 2011). That said literature failed to identify a clear linkage or relationship
between consequences of amount of construction waste generated and their corresponding causes and
origins. Additionally, Agopyan et al. (1998) argued that the lack of knowledge of waste generators is a
noteworthy cause of waste. Furthermore, there are no forecasting comprehensive and reliable methods
and tools to predict and estimate the amount of constructed waste before projects start on site
(Formoso et al. 1999). Therefore, an accountable top-down dynamic relationship between main causes
and origins of construction waste and their respective amount of construction waste generated. This
was supported by Teo (2001) who acknowledged that there are limited construction waste reduction
methods that specifically address known causes and origins of waste. On the other hand, the analysis
of sources of waste indicated that a large quantity of material waste is due to flow activities, such as
material delivery, inventories, and internal transportation and handling (Formoso et al. 2002). The
transformational approach suggests that an independent control of each stage of production is required,
whereas flow processes’ approach suggests that a focus on the control of the total flow of production is
needed (Koskela 1999).

There is a consensus in literature that all construction stages directly or indirectly contribute to onsite
waste generation. However, the level and severity of waste production varied from stage to stages
depending on a number of variables that include type of procurement, project brief, stakeholders’
engagement and commitment, etc. That said, it is widely argued that waste reduction intervention
should focus on pre-construction stages, particularly design, where ‘virtual waste’ (simulated waste
generation during design stages), as opposed to ‘actual waste’ (physical onsite waste), could be
effectively identified, evaluated and reduced.
2.2 CURRENT WASTE MINIMISATION PRACTICES
Numerous studies have been conducted through all stages of construction project lifecycle to examine
and assess current CWM approaches, techniques and tools of CWM; these are summarized in Table 1,
Table 2 and Table 3 respectively The primary reference used for project protocol in terms of lifecycle
stages is the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) Plan of Work (RIBA 2011), which contains
the following project stages: A) Appraisal; B) Design Brief; C) Concept; D) Design Development; E)
Technical Design; F) Production Information; G) Tender Documentation; H) Tender Action; J)
Mobilisation; K) Construction to Practical Completion; L) Post Practical Completion.

Table 1: Current CWM approaches in project lifecycle stages

Pre- Post-
Preparation Construction Construction construction
Approaches stages Design stages stages and Use stages stages
A B C D E F G H J K L M N Source
Designing out waste Osmani et al. 2007,
★ ★
★ ★ ★ WRAP 2009
Procurement WRAP 2010
★ ★
guidance
Material Logistic WRAP 2007a
★ ★ ★
Plans
Reverse logistics ★ ★ ★ Nunes et al. 2003
Supply chain Dainty and Brooke
management ★ ★ 2004
On-site sorting ★ ★ Poon et al. 2001
Waste Management Shen et al. 2004
★
Mapping Model
On-site waste Formoso et al. 1999
★
control
Cost-effective waste Mills et al. 1999
★
management plan
On-site waste Begum et al. 2009
★
behaviour / attitude
Implementation of Shen and Tam 2002
environmental ★ ★ ★
management

Table 2: Current CWM techniques in project lifecycle stages

Pre- Construction Post-
Techniques Preparation Construction and Use construction
stages Design stages stages stages stages
A B C D E F G H J K L M N Source
On-site recycling C&D CIRIA 2001
★
wastes
Materials flow analysis Bertram et al.
★ ★
system 2002
Ready-mixed concrete Sealey and Jill
★
waste management 2001
Dynamic modelling of Hao 2008
construction and
★
demolition waste
management processes
Integrated GPS and GIS Hi et al. 2005
★
technology
Geographical Blengini and
Information System Garbarino 2010
(GIS) and Life Cycle ★ ★
Assessment (LCA) mix
for supply chain
Use of off-site technique: Baldwin et al.
prefabricated / precast ★ 2008
★
concrete elements
Modern methods of WRAP 2007b
★ ★
construction (MMC)

• Current CWM approaches mainly focus on strategic vision forethoughts related to

design, logistic and supply chain, and on-site waste issues.
 • Current CWM techniques developed by the industry are mainly concerned with on on-
site, off-site, and logistic waste minimisation issues.
• Current CWM tools, such as SMARTWaste, are related waste audit and better onsite
practices to comply with waste regulations, such as Site Waste Management Plans
(SWMPs) (WRAP 2011d).

Table 3: Current CWM tools in project lifecycle stages

Pre- Post-
Preparation Construction Construction and construction
Tools
stages Design stages stages Use stages stages
A B C D E F G H J K L M N Source
Waste forecasting tool WRAP 2011b
★ ★
(online tool)
On-site waste auditing: McGrath 2001
★
SMARTWaste
Waste management McDonald and
★
planning (WMP) Smithers 1998
On-site waste control Formoso et al.
★
tools 1999
Site waste WRAP 2011d
management plans ★
(SWMPs)
ConstructCLEAR BlueWise 2010
★
(online tool)
True cost of waste BRE 2010
★
calculator (online tool)
SMARTAudit ★ BRE 2008
BreMap (online GIS BRE 2009
★ ★
tool)
SMARTStart ★ ★ BRE 2007
Webfill (online tool) ★ ★ Chen et al. 2006

The current CWM approaches, techniques and tools focus on separate project stages with
overwhelming endeavours to manage waste onsite. However, limited effort is invested to concentrate
on pre-construction waste generation related to supply chain management issues and procurement,
design and tender stages. These offer substantial waste reduction opportunities on McKechnie’s (2007)
waste reduction opportunity curve. More recently, BRE (2011) called for the development of online
CWM techniques and tools. Yet, there are no research studies on integrated e-waste minimisation or
IT related approaches, techniques and tools across all life cycle stages of construction projects. These
would particularly be suited to design out waste, since 33% of construction waste might be directly
influenced by inappropriate design decision making and design changes (Innes 2004), which
contribute to more than 50% of the total onsite waste production in construction projects (Faniran and
Caban 1998).

3. BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING (BIM)

BIM has evolved from computer-aid design (CAD) research. However, there is still no single, widely-
accepted definition for BIM. BIM is defined in different terms from model and design data to
construction management. From a three dimensional (3D) perspective, BIM is defined as a conceptual
approach to building design and construction that encompasses 3D parametric modelling of building
for design and detailing and computer-intelligible exchange of building information between design,
construction and other disciplines (Sacks et al. 2010). From a design and project data management
standpoint, BIM is a set of interacting policies, processes and technologies that generate a
methodology to manage building design and project data in digital format across all life-cycle stages
(Penttilä 2006). In terms of construction management, BIM is an intelligent simulation of architecture
to achieve an integrated project delivery (Eastman et al. 2008). However, literature failed to define
BIM in relation to sustainable construction performance. Therefore, BIM within the context of this
research can be defined as a real-time interactive and collaborative communication system, having the
potential to help project stakeholders to collaboratively attain construction waste minimisation
throughout the whole lifecycle stages of a building by improving building construction performance.
3.1 BIM-RELATED SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS
A wide range of BIM software applications are currently available for various project performance
purposes. As shown in Table 4, the vast majority of BIM related packages focused on design and pre-
construction stages. There is a consensus in literature that BIM applications in their current use are
vastly superior to 2D and 3D CAD-based tools, which do not maintain comprehensive integrity when
changes are made. On the other hand, it is widely acknowledged that associating BIM with the
development and use of 3D virtual building modeling techniques and technologies can yield very
productive results.

Table 4: Current BIM applications in construction projects

Pre- Construction Post-

Preparation Design Construction and Use construction
Current BIM
stages stages stages stages stages Source
A B C D E F G H J K L M N
Beck Technology Dprofiler √ Beck Technology
Carlson (CVE) Olatunji and Sher
√
2010
Nemetschek Vectorworks √ √ √ √ √ √ Nemetschek
Gehry Technologies Digital Gehry Technologies
√ √ √ √ √
Project
Navisworks JetStream v5 AGC 2006
√
Roamer and Clash Detective √
Autodesk Green Building Autodesk
√
Studio
ArtrA √ √ ArtrA
Autodesk Revit √ √ √ √ Autodesk
Graphisoft ArchiCAD √ √ √ √ Graphisoft
Bentley Systems Architecture √ √ √ √ Bentley Systems
MasterBill, QSCAD Olatunji and Sher
√ √ √
Timberline 2010
Primavera, Construction Olatunji and Sher
√ √ √
Computer Software(CCS) 2010
PP Manager √ √ Nemetschek
Navisworks TimeLiner √ √ AGC 2006
Graphisoft Change Manager √ √ √ AGC 2006
CostX, Inovayya, Tocoman, Olatunji and Sher
√ √ √
CRC estimator, Winest 2010
BIM and interoperability for Sacks et al. 2010
√ √
precast
Tekla Structures √ √ √ √ √ Tekla
StructureWorks StructureWorks
√ √
√
Design Data SDS/2 Design Data 2010
√ √
√

BIM applications in construction projects such as Beck Technology DProfiler and Carlson (CVE) are
being used for economic assessments (cost estimating and income forecasting) of project substantive
feasibility in the preparation stages. However, there is a lack of BIM tools to help satisfy the client’s
business requirement; identify potential solutions for feasibility studies; and outline project feasibility
requirements.

Furthermore, BIM applications are predominantly used for decision making, and lean or sustainable
building construction and performance analysis, such as energy and water analysis are used in pre-
construction stages.

Although there are several BIM tools available for construction and post-occupancy stages, such as
Tekla Structures (precast/prefabricate solution), StructureWorks (precast solution), Navisworks
JetStream v5 (combining and reviewing 3D models), and PP Manager (linkage between CAD, factory
and the ERP software); these are mainly used for prefabrication and construction management
purposes in the construction stage.
Hence, the existing construction- related BIM applications are used contribute to:
• lower net information costs and risks;
• quick first response in early stage of design to make building safer;
• efficient monitoring lower operation cost;
• better views of facilities for better decision makings;
• reduced project cost and risks; and
• better building environmental performance

3.2 USE OF BIM IN MANAGING SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION

There is an opportunity for BIM to offer valuable controlling features and analysis tools, to manage
and maintain the original information of client needs through the design process (Penttilä 2007,
Baldwin et al. 1998). BIM enhanced communication and collaboration is an important facet of
managing successful sustainable construction (Grilo and Jardim-Goncalves 2010). It has been argued
that BIM could enhance communication and collaboration; increase efficiency; and reduces errors,
which in turn would reduce resources, energy, materials, and waste (Europe INNOVA 2008).
Furthermore, BIM provides the opportunity of testing, revising, rejecting and accepting design ideas in
real-time, such as the case for collaborative design methods.

Figure 1: the IICC BIM platform for managing sustainable construction

The integrated information management associated with BIM for construction information would
enable modelling, communication, collaboration and integration of sustainable design and construction
requirements and actions across all project lifecycle. This would also improve decision making
support and other project-related processes by optimising horizontal, vertical, and temporal integration
of data and information management to enhance the value added for all project shareholders (Ilal
2007). Further, by adopting BIM technology, integrated project delivery (IPD) (AIA 2007) fosters a
great degree of communication and promotes intense collaboration among the project team to enhance
profitable, effective, and efficient project management (Hardin 2009). Therefore, integrated
information management, integrated design, and IPD enhanced BIM solution can contribute to an
efficient approach for managing sustainable construction.
BIM includes transactions at the data; information and knowledge semantic levels and falls within
knowledge visualisation; a merger between information visualisation; and visual cognition and
communication. (Eppler and Burkhard 2005). Knowledge, players and every component of project
concerned will have the opportunity to contribute to managing sustainable construction as a whole;
and influence others as individual by using BIM in the form of an integrated information,
communication, and collaboration (IICC) platform. The IICC BIM platform for managing sustainable
construction is shown as Figure 1. Design; decision making; sustainable performance monitoring; and
analysis/simulation are four main application categories of IICC BIM platform for facilitating
sustainable construction management.

Although, BIM offers promising methods for energy and resource efficiency, yet BIM methods at
present do not consider a way forward for construction waste minimisation.

4. KNOWLEDGE GAP ANALYSIS

There are a number of techniques and tools for waste management that have been developed and
introduced to the UK construction industry by leading organisations such as, BRE, WRAP, and
CIRIA. These are widely adopted techniques and tools, such as a suite of software packages of
SMARTWaste and SWMPs, which can facilitate onsite construction waste management. However,
these techniques and tools focus on auditing and managing physical onsite construction waste that has
already been generated, without measures to assist designers and other project stakeholders to design
out waste. Online waste minimisation methods such as WRAP Waste Forecasting tools, and offsite
techniques such as prefabricated/precast and modern methods of construction are being moderately
used in construction projects. The extant of literature suggest that there are limited techniques and
tools to assess and support construction waste minimisation performance for design decision making
in Preparation, Design and Pre-Construction stages. On the other hand, BIM as a mature technique has
been widely used in design and construction for many years. BIM applications, which have been
supplied by established CAD software companies, concentrate predominantly on solving technical
problems throughout all project stages.

Indeed, current BIM techniques and tools have been successfully used to enhance planning and
construction relate issues during Preparation, Design and Pre-Construction stages; including
improvement of sustainable project performance such as energy and resource efficiency. Although, it
is widely accepted that BIM can help reduce waste-related costs and materials in construction projects
(Nisbet and Dinesen 2010, Krygiel and Nies 2008, AIA 2007); at present there are no techniques and
tools available that explore BIM as a platform to facilitate CWM. Hence this paper, which is part of an
ongoing doctoral study, aims to develop a BIM aided CWM framework. The key objective is to
improve sustainable construction waste minimisation by using BIM at the very early stages of design.
The subsequent stages of this research will include simulating construction waste (virtual waste)
through 3D building information (figure 2).

5. CONCLUSIONS
This paper has explored the potential to improve CWM through BIM systems in construction through
a critical review of literature, by examining waste origins and causes, current waste reduction practice,
and current BIM practices; and examining existing BIM applications that are currently applied to
evaluate sustainable project construction and management. The most significant finding that stems
from this paper is that although there was an emphasis on the need to explore the use of BIM for
CWM; there are no previous attempts to adopt BIM as a vehicle to reduce construction waste. Hence,
this research sets out to develop a BIM framework to aid CWM. The next stages of this research will
involve designers, contractors and BIM experts to explore the most appropriate approach to adopt BIM
as potential platform for CWM; select and customise a suitable BIM software; and develop and
validate a BIM aided CWM in a live project.
 Figure 2: the IICC BIM platform and conceptual construction waste material input-output

REFERENCES
AGC (2006) “Contractors’ Guide to BIM” The Associated General Contractors of America.
Agopyan, V. et al. (1998) "Alternatives for Reducing Material Waste on Building Sites", Research
report.
AIA (2007) "Integrated project delivery: a guide", AIA California Council.
Baldwin, A. N. et al. (1998) "Planning building design by simulating information flow", Automation in
Construction. 8. 2. 149-163.
Baldwin, A.N. et al. (2008) "Modelling design information to evaluate pre-fabricated and pre-cast
design solutions for reducing construction waste in high rise residential buildings", Automation in
Construction. 17. 3. 333-341.
Begum, R.A. et al. (2009) "Attitude and behavioral factors in waste management in the construction
industry of Malaysia", Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 53. 6. 321-328.
Bertram, M. et al. (2002) "The contemporary European copper cycle: waste management subsystem",
Ecological Economics. 42. 1-2. 43-57.
Blengini, G.A. & Garbarino, E. (2010) "Resources and waste management in Turin (Italy): the role of
recycled aggregates in the sustainable supply mix", Journal of Cleaner Production. 18. 10-11.
1021-1030.
BlueWise (2010) ConstructCLEAR. [Online]. Available: http://www.constructclear.co.uk/ [2011, 17
Jan] .
BRE (2007) SMARTStart [Online]. Available: http://www.smartwaste.co.uk/smartstart/about.jsp
[2011, 17 Jan] .
BRE (2008) SMARTAudit [Online]. Available: http://www.smartwaste.co.uk/smartaudit.jsp?id=27
[2011, 17 Jan] .
BRE (2009) BreMap. [Online]. Available: http://www.bremap.co.uk/Default.aspx [2011, 17 Jan]
BRE (2010) True cost of waste calculator. [Online]. Available:
http://www.wastecalculator.co.uk/login.jsp [2011, 17 Jan] .
BRE (2011) Waste management tools and training. Available: http://www.bre.co.uk/page.jsp?id=1444
[2011, 22 April].
Chen, Z. et al. (2006) "E-commerce system simulation for construction and demolition waste
exchange", Automation in Construction. 15. 6. 706-718.
CIRIA (2001) "Waste minimisation in construction: training pack". CIRIA.
Dainty, A.R.J. & Brooke, R.J. (2004) "Towards improved construction waste minimisation: a need for
improved supply chain integration?" Structural Survey. 22. 1. 20-29.
Defra (2007) “Waste Strategy for England 2007”, TSO (The Stationery Office), Norwich.
Design Data (2010) SDS/2 by Design Data. [Online]. Available: http://www.dsndata.com/ [2010, 02
November].
Eastman, C. et al. (2008) “BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners,
Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Canada.
Edgar, A. (2007) "W15: Introduction to BIM: People, Processes and Tools", NIBS.
Environment Agency (1997) "Waste minimisation and waste management: an environmental good
practice guide for industry ". Solihull. E.A.
Envirowise (1998) " Waste minimisation clubs: setting them up for success". Harwell.
Eppler, M. & Burkhard, R. (2005) "Knowledge visualization", Encyclopedia of Knowledge
Management. 551-560.
Europe INNOVA (2008) 15 Dec-last update, The STAND-INN HANDBOOK. [Online]. Available:
http://standards.eu-innova.org/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?id=172 [2011, 11 Jan] .
Formoso, C.T. et al. (1999) "Method for waste control in the building industry", Proceedings IGLC-7,
7th Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Berkeley, CA.
Formoso, C.T. et al. (2002) "Material Waste in Building Industry: Main Causes and Prevention",
Journal of construction engineering and management. 316-325.
Grilo, A. & Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2010) "Building information modeling and collaborative working
environments", Automation in Construction, 19. 5. 521-521.
Hao, J.L. et al. (2008) "Managing construction waste on-site through system dynamics modelling: the
case of Hong Kong", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 15. 2.
Ilal, M.E. (2007) "The quest for integrated design system: a brief survey of past and current efforts",
Middle East Technical University Journal of the Faculty of Architecture. 24. 2. 10.
Innes, S. (2004) "Developing tools for designing out waste pre-site and on-site", Proceedings of
Minimising Construction Waste Conference: Developing Resource Efficiency and Waste
Minimisation in Design and Construction.
Keys, A. et al. (2000) “Designing to encourage waste minimisation in the construction industry”,
CIBSE (Chartered Institute of Building Services Engineers).
Kiviniemi, A. (2005) "Requirements Management Interface to Building Product Models", CIFE
technical report 161.
Koskela, L. (1999) "Management of production in construction: a theoretical view", Proceedings of
the Seventh Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction IGLC-7, 241-
252.
Krygiel, E. & Nies, B. (2008) “Green BIM: Successful Sustainable Design with Building Information
Modeling” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Canada.
McKechnie, E. & Brown, E. (2007) "Achieving effective waste minimisation through design." Waste
& Resources Action Programme, Oxen.
Li, H. et al. (2005) "Application of integrated GPS and GIS technology for reducing construction
waste and improving construction efficiency", Automation in Construction. 14. 3. 323-331.
McDonald, B. & Smithers, M. (1998) "Implementing a waste management plan during the
construction phase of a project: a case study". Construction Management and Economics. 16. 1.
71-78.
McGrath, C. (2001) "Waste minimisation in practice", Resources conservation and recycling. 32. 3-4.
227-238.
Mills, T.H. et al. (1999) "A Cost-Effective Waste Management Plan". Cost Engineering. 41, 3. 35-43.
Nisbet, N. & Dinesen, B. (2010) “Building information modelling: construction the business case”
British Standards Institution, London.
Nunes, K.R.A. et al. (2009) "Reverse logistics in the Brazilian construction industry", Journal of
environmental management, 90. 12. 3717-3720.
Olatunji, O.A. & Sher, W.D. (2010) "A Comparative Analysis of 2D Computer-Aided Estimating
Procedures" in Handbook of research on building information modeling and construction
informatics: concepts and technologies, eds. J. Underwood & U. Isikdag, Information Science
Reference. 170-189.
Osmani, M. et al. (2006) "Architect and contractor attitudes to waste minimisation", Proceedings of
the Institution of Civil Engineers : Waste and Resource Managament, 159. 65-72.
Osmani, M. et al. (2007) "Architects' perspectives on construction waste reduction by design", Waste
Management, 28. 7, 1147-1158.
Osmani, M. (2011) “Construction Waste”, in Letcher T.M. & Vallero D. A. (eds) Waste: A Handbook
for Management, Elsevier, 207-218.
Penttilä, H. (2006) "Describing the changes in architectural information technology to understand
design complexity and free-form architectural expression", ITCON 11 (Special Issue The Effects
of CAD on Building Form and Design Quality), 395-408.
Penttilä, H. (2007) "Early Architectural Design and BIM", Computer-Aided Architectural Design
Futures (CAADFutures), 6. 291-302.
Poon, C.S. et al. (2001) "On-site sorting of construction and demolition waste in Hong Kong".
Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 32. 2. 157-172.
RIBA (2011) RIBA Plan of work [Online]. Available:
http://www.pedr.co.uk/textpage.asp?menu=1a&sortorder=130&area=main [2011, 11 Jan] .
Riemer, J. & Kristoffersen, M. (1999) “Information on waste management practices” European
Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sacks, R. et al. (2010) "The Rosewood experiment — Building information modeling and
interoperability for architectural precast facades", Automation in Construction, 19. 4. 419-432.
Sealey, B.J. et al. (2001) "Waste management issues for the UK ready-mixed concrete industry",
Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 32. 3-4. 321-331.
Shen, L.Y. & Tam, V.W.Y. (2002) "Implementation of environmental management in the Hong Kong
construction industry", International Journal of Project Management. 20. 7. 535-543.
Shen, L.Y. et al. (2004) "Mapping approach for examining waste management on construction sites",
Journal of construction engineering and management.
Teo, M.M.M. (2001) "A theory of waste behaviour in the construction industry", Construction
Management and Economics, 19. 7. 741-751.
WRAP (2007a) "Material Logistics Plan Good Practice Guidance". WRAP.
WRAP (2007b) “Current practices and future potential in modern methods of construction”. WRAP.
WRAP (2009) "Designing out Waste: a design team guide for buildings". WRAP.
WRAP (2010) “Setting a requirement for Waste Minimisation and Management”. WRAP.
WRAP (2011a) Halving Waste to Landfill [Homepage of Waste & Resources Action Programme],
[Online]. Available: http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/halving_waste_to_landfill/index.html
[2011, 17 Jan].
WRAP (2011b) The role of the Net Waste Tool [Online]. Available:
http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/tools_and_guidance/net_waste_tool/the_role_of_the_net.ht
ml [2011, 17 Jan].
Zakar, S. (2008) “Wastage Rate Report.” Building Research Establishment (BRE), Garston.