This document discusses different aggravating circumstances related to means and methods used to commit crimes. It provides examples of how circumstances like "by means of fire", "by means of explosion", or "by means of derailment of a locomotive" could qualify a crime as murder if used with the intent to kill, or could constitute other crimes like arson or damage to property if no intent to kill was present. The document also explains that if an aggravating circumstance is already included in the definition of a crime, it cannot be used to further increase the penalty.
This document discusses different aggravating circumstances related to means and methods used to commit crimes. It provides examples of how circumstances like "by means of fire", "by means of explosion", or "by means of derailment of a locomotive" could qualify a crime as murder if used with the intent to kill, or could constitute other crimes like arson or damage to property if no intent to kill was present. The document also explains that if an aggravating circumstance is already included in the definition of a crime, it cannot be used to further increase the penalty.
This document discusses different aggravating circumstances related to means and methods used to commit crimes. It provides examples of how circumstances like "by means of fire", "by means of explosion", or "by means of derailment of a locomotive" could qualify a crime as murder if used with the intent to kill, or could constitute other crimes like arson or damage to property if no intent to kill was present. The document also explains that if an aggravating circumstance is already included in the definition of a crime, it cannot be used to further increase the penalty.
This document discusses different aggravating circumstances related to means and methods used to commit crimes. It provides examples of how circumstances like "by means of fire", "by means of explosion", or "by means of derailment of a locomotive" could qualify a crime as murder if used with the intent to kill, or could constitute other crimes like arson or damage to property if no intent to kill was present. The document also explains that if an aggravating circumstance is already included in the definition of a crime, it cannot be used to further increase the penalty.
The basis has reference to means and ways employed.
Unless used by the offender as a means to
accomplish a criminal purpose, any of the circumstances in paragraph cannot be considered to increase the penalty or to change the nature of the offense.
As generic aggravating circumstance.
A killed his wife by means of fire, as when he set their house on fire to kill her; or by means of explosion, as when he threw a hand grenade at her to kill her; or by means of poison which he mixed with the food of his wife. In any of these cases, there is only a generic aggravating circumstance, because they cannot qualify the crime. The crime committed is parricide which is already qualified by relationship. When another aggravating circumstance already qualifies the any of these aggravating circumstances shall be considered as generic aggravating circumstance only. When there is no actual design to kill a person in burning a house, it is plain arson even if a person is killed. When the crime intended to be committed is arson and somebody dies as a result thereof, the crime is simply arson and the act resulting in the death of that person is not even an independent crime of homicide, it being absorbed. (People vs. Paterno, et 85 Phil. 722) If death resulted as a consequence of arson committed on any of the properties and under any of the circumstances mentioned in Articles 320 to 326, the court shall impose the death penalty. (Art. 320, Revised Penal Code, as amended) On the other hand, if the offender had the intent to kill the victim, burned the house where the latter was, and the victim died as a consequence, the crime is murder, qualified by the circumstance that the crime was committed "by means of fire." (See Art. 248) When used as a means to kill another person, the crime is murder. The killing of the victim by means of such circumstances as inundation, fire, poison, or explosion qualifies it to murder. (Art. 248, Par. 3) 1. "By means of fire" In a case, the accused had set fire to an automobile under a building, with the result that the edifice was consumed by fire. One of the inmates of the house perished in the conflagration. Held: In order to constitute murder, there should be an actual design to kill and that the use of fire should be purposely adopted as a means to that end. (U.S. vs. Burns, 41 Phil. 418, 432) Hence, if the purpose of the explosion, inundation, fire or poison is to kill a predetermined person, the crime committed is murder. Once any of these circumstances is alleged in the information to qualify the offense, it should not be considered as generic aggravating circumstance for the purpose of increasing the penalty, because it is an integral elemen t of the offense. But if a house was set on fire after the killing of the victim, there would be two separate crimes of arson and murder or homicide. (People vs. Bersabal, 48 Phil. People vs. Piring, 63 Phil. 546, 552) There would not be an aggravating circumstance of "by mean s of fire." 2. "By means of explosion" What crime is committed if a hand grenade is thrown into the house where a family of seven persons live, and as a result of the explosion, the wall of the house is damaged, endangering the lives of the people there? The offense is a crime involving destruction. (Art. 324) If one of the people there died, but there is no intent to kill on the part of the offender, it will be a crime involving destruction also, but the penalty will be death. But if there is intent to kill and explosion is by the offender to accomplish his criminal purpose, it is murder the victim dies as a direct consequence thereof.3. means of derailment of locomotive" Under Art. 330, which defines and penalizes the crime of damage to mean s of communication, derailment of cars, collision or accident must result from damage to a railway, telegraph or telephone lines. But this is without prejudice to the criminal liability for other consequences of criminal act. What crime is committed if as a result of the derailment of cars only property is damaged? It is damage to means of communication under Art. 330. (2) What is the crime if the death of a person also results without intent to kill on the part of the offender? It is a complex crime of damage to m e ans of communication with homicide. (Arts. 330 and 249 in relation to Arts. 4 and 48) (3) What is the crime committed, if the death of a person resulted and there was intent to kill on the part of the offender? It is murder, because the derailment of cars or locomotive was the m e an s used to kill the victim. (Art. 248) (4) Must this aggravating circumstance be considered to raise the penalty, if it already qualifies the crime to murder? No, because of Art. 62, par. which provides that when the aggravating circumstance is included by the law in defining a crime, it shall not be taken into consideration for the purpose of increasing the penalty. It will be noted that each of the circumstances of "fire," "explosion," and "derailment of a locomotive" may be a part of the definition of particular crime, such as, arson (Art. 320), crime involving destruction (Art. 324), and damages and obstruction to means of communication. (Art. 330) In these cases, they do not serve to increase the penalty, because they are already included by the law in defining the crimes. Par. 12 distinguished from Par. 7. Under par. 12, the crime is committed by means of any of such acts involving great waste or ruin. Under par. 7, the crime is committed on the occasion of a calamity or misfortune.