Bindu 532 Criticism
Bindu 532 Criticism
Bindu 532 Criticism
certain methods into good qualities. Thus, if they In the same purport, Viswanath also delineates
feel that a person may be benefited by discussing four types of asādhus, wicked or bad persons, who
that person’s faults, they may, under appropriate are characterized according to their propensity
circumstances, speak harsh words. Neem juice for fault-finding:
tastes very bitter, but it can cure diseases when 1) Asādhu (“wicked person”) — An asādhu sees some
administered appropriately. It should be noted that good qualities in others but presumes that eventually
a mahat will never reject or condemn a faulty person
those good qualities will be overshadowed or spoiled by
but thinks only how that person may be benefited.
some fault. For example, upon seeing someone working
2) Mahattara (“greater person”) — A mahattara also
for another person’s benefit, the asādhu will conclude that
sees good and bad qualities in others but focuses on
and praises the good qualities. Seeing a materialistic eventually he or she will want to exploit the person whom
merchant, a mahattara will think, “Although he is a they are helping. Simply put, asādhus are not gentlemen.
sense-gratifier, he takes good care of guests and is 2) Asādhutara (“very wicked person”) — An
worthy of deliverance.” asādhutara is even more improper. He or she sees only
3) Mahattama (“especially great person”) — A faults in others and overlooks others’ good qualities.
mahattama sees whatever good qualities others “This sannyāsī eats ghee rice to fill his stomach. He is
have and magnifies them, not seeing even the lusty and should be considered fallen.”
smallest fault. Viswanath describes their attitude, 3) Asādhutama (“especially wicked person”) — An
“This person has stolen my cloth because he is cold, asādhutama takes small faults and magnifies them, seeing
and though he has a weapon, he doesn’t attack me no good qualities at all. Viswanath gives an example.
because he is merciful. He is virtuous.” An asādhutama will criticize and condemn a renunciate
4) Ati-mahattama (“extremely great person”) — as being a “bogus rascal”, for the fault of giving up the
An ati-mahattama sees good qualities in others even forest and living in the house of a married man. The
where there are none. Their attitude is, “In this world asādhutama will conclude, “His obvious motivation is
there are no bad people. Everyone is good.” only to steal the money of that householder.”
Issue Five Hundred Thirty-two, Page — 6 श्रीकृष्णकथामृत बिन् दु
sohate sāyaker viddhaṁ vanaṁ paraśunā hatam
vācā duruktaṁ bībhatsaṁ na saṁrohati vāk-kṣatam
A forest, whether pierced by arrows or cut down
by scythes, grows again, but a heart pierced with
harsh and rude words never recovers.
karṇinālīkanārācān nirharanti śarīrataḥ
vāk-śalyas tu na nirhartuṁ śakyo hṛdiśayo hi saḥ
Arrows and darts can be extracted from the body,
but the darts of words cannot be extracted from
the depth of the heart.
Bibliography
— Vidurnītiḥ. Dr. Kiran Shukla (editor). J. P. Publishing House. Delhi. 2000.
— Mahābhārata (electronic critical edition). Muneo Tokunaga and
the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. Pune, India. 1999.
Unknown artist
The Lord delivers his devotees from the ocean of material existence
nāhi kona kale: a critic never attains benefit. Critics The so-called professors and their students fol-
go to hell. Instead of criticizing others, one should low principles of religion, perform pious acts,
rectify oneself. (Amrta Vani, page 251) and execute austerities, yet [by nature] they are
blasphemers and rogues.
The Nature of Non-devotees and Pretenders
In antya-līlā (3.29) of his Caitanya-bhāgavata, Srila
Our Goswami ācāryas repeatedly define non- Vrindavan Das Thakur has described the quality of
devotees as those who engage in the business of vaiṣṇavas and false-devotees as follows:
fault-finding. Srila Krishnadas Kaviraj Goswami has ei se vaiṣṇava-dharma-sabāre praṇati
explained (in Cc. ādi 17.260) sei dharmadhvajī, yāra ithe nāhi rati
yata adhyāpaka, āra tāṅra śiṣya-gaṇa The dharma or nature of a vaiṣṇava is they offer respects
dharmī, karmī, tapo-niṣṭha, nindaka, durjana to everyone. The dharmadhvajīs, hypocritical pretenders
Issue Five Hundred Thirty-two, Page — 8 श्रीकृष्णकथामृत बिन् दु
Unknown photographer
(literally, persons who advertise or wave the flag of The Caitanya-caritāmṛta (madhya 5.90) makes the
their religiosity), are those who have no attachment same point:
for this.
jāni’ sākṣī nāhi deya, tāra pāpa haya
Speak the Truth Frankly
A person who knows things as they are and still does
However, one may have a doubt in this regard. not bear witness becomes involved in sinful activities
One may point out that great ācāryas such as Srila
When commenting on the word “satyam” in his
Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur Prabhupada and
purport to Bg. 10.4, Srila Prabhupada speaks in a
Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada often spoke
similar way:
strongly, pointed out faults in others, and encouraged
According to social conventions, it is said that one
their disciples to do the same. Indeed, śāstra instructs
can speak the truth only when it is palatable to oth-
that if one has the strength to do so, it is a great fault to ers. But that is not truthfulness. The truth should be
ignore sinful acts and not bring such offenders to justice: spoken in a straightforward way, so that others will
understand actually what the facts are. If a man is a
jānann api ca yaḥ pāpaṁ śaktimān na niyacchati
thief and if people are warned that he is a thief, that
īśaḥ san so ‘pi tenaiva karmaṇā samprayujyate
is truth. Although sometimes the truth is unpalatable,
A man who has power to punish sin but does not do so, one should not refrain from speaking it. Truthfulness
who knows a sin has been committed, takes a reaction demands that the facts be presented as they are for
for that sin. (Mahābhārata ādi 171.12) the benefit of others. That is the definition of truth.
Sri Krishna Kathamrita Bindu Issue Five Hundred Thirty two, Page — 9
That leader was a lady and was received with respect
by senior devotees who began showing her around
Ślokāmṛta
the project. Tagging along with them was a new
Don’t Agitate Others bhakta. This new devotee had recently memorized a
verse. Deciding to say something he felt was relevant
The following verse is quoted in Srila Rupa Goswami’s
and inspiring to the politician, at an opportune
Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhuḥ (1.2.117) as well as Srila
moment he came close and told her, “Chanakya
Jiva Goswami’s Bhakti-sandarbha (106). Both of them
Pandit has advised, viśvāso naiva kartavyaḥ strīṣu rāja-
cite it as being from the Mahābhārata.
kuleṣu ca: ‘There are two persons one should not trust
piteva putraṁ karuṇo nodvejayati yo janam — a politician and a woman.’”
viśuddhasya hṛṣīkeśas tūrṇaṁ tasya prasīdati Although the verse was one that was sometimes
Lord Krishna at once gives his mercy to a person cited by Srila Prabhupada, it didn’t seem to impress
who does not trouble others and who is as kind to the lady politician, who after the exchange never
them as a father is to his son. came again to our center. It’s clear that bold speaking
— Jiva Goswami. Śrī Bhakti-sandarbha. English translation by needs to be tempered with wisdom.
Kusakratha Das. The Krishna Institute. Culver City, California.
In an article titled, “Vaiṣṇava-nindā”, Srila Thakur
Bhaktivinode has explained that śāstra does not
forbid one from discussing others’ faults if one has
good intentions. He says those good intentions are
of two kinds:
1. If some auspiciousness comes to a person by discuss-
ing their sins, then it is good to do so.
Again, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur
Prabhupada has strongly declared:
There is no doubt that the words of the sādhu possess
the power of destroying the evil propensities of one’s
mind. The sādhus in this way benefit everyone who
associates with them. There are many things which
we do not disclose to the sādhu. The real sādhu makes
us speak out what we keep concealed in our hearts.
He then applies the knife. The very word “sādhu” has
no meaning other than this. He stands in front of the
block with the uplifted sacrificial knife in his hand.
The sensuous desires of men are like goats. The sādhu
stands there to kill those desires by the merciful
stroke of the keen edge of the sacrificial knife in the
form of unpleasant language. If the sādhu turns into
my flatterer then he does me harm, he becomes my
enemy. If he gives us flattery, then we are led to the
road that brings enjoyment but no real well-being.
(Sri Chaitanya’s Teachings. Pp. 26-27)
Unknown photographer
Unknown artist
nāma-sphurti, the appearance of the holy name in one’s
heart, and keeps one from becoming a vaiṣṇava.
Therefore, Bhaktivinode instructs:
Unless one has a noble intention, one should never Krishna and Mother Yashoda
discuss about any previous faults that a vaiṣṇava might
have had prior to the awakening of bhakti. Nor should yasya deve parā bhaktir yathā deve tathā gurau — One
a vaiṣṇava be criticized for any leftover impurities he should have complete faith in the guru, who helps the
or she may have. (Sajjana-toṣaṇī 5.3 and 5.5. Article disciple make progress in spiritual life.
entitled, “Vaiṣṇava-nindā”.) Instructing and chastising individuals is the business
Business of Guru of guru. This is even more so in the case of devotees.
Although devotees speak boldly and don’t Even the demigods do not attempt to chastise the
compromise when speaking on the principles of vaiṣṇavas. In his Bhakti-sandarbha (148), Srila Jiva
bhakti, they generally avoid speaking about the faults Goswami quotes a verse from the Skanda Purāṇa:
of any particular person and focus on the sin rather na brahmā na śivāgnīndrā nāhaṁ nānye divaukasaḥśaktās tu
than the sinner. The śāstric principle as described in nigrahaṁ kartuṁ vaiṣṇavānāṁ mahātmanām
the Padma Purāṇa (Brahma khaṇḍa 25.17) is: Lord Brahma, Lord Shiva, Agni, Indra, myself (Yama-
aśraddadhāne vimukhe ’py asṛṇvati raj), and other demigods are unable to chastise the
yaś copadeśaḥ śiva-nāmāparādhah broad-minded vaiṣṇavas.
It is an offense to the holy name to give instructions If someone doesn’t have faith in us it is an offense to
to those who are aśraddhā, without faith; vimukha, try to instruct them. In that case we should teach by
reluctant or opposed to our message; or aśṛṇvati, one example. Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
who is not listening.
wrote the following in a letter to a disciple:
Guru is one whom we have faith in. In his purport
I have noted your several complaints against the
to Bhāgavatam 8.17.1, Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami devotees, but it would be better to set the example
Prabhupada quotes and explains a verse from the rather than to criticize the defects of the devotees.
Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad (6.23): We should always remember that we recruit members
Unknown artist. Chitrashala Press. Pune. Late 19th - early 20th century
Issue Five Hundred Thirty-two, Page — 12 श्रीकृष्णकथामृत बिन् दु