Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 191 views

    Statement of Objections For I.A No.6 Prasanna v. Madhava

    Uploaded by

    Sharath Kanzal
    The plaintiff filed a statement of objections in response to an application filed by the defendant in a civil court case. The plaintiff argues that the defendant's application should be dismissed as it lacks merit and the allegations made are factually incorrect. Furthermore, the plaintiff asserts that the defendant is attempting to avoid furnishing a security payment of Rs. 19 lakh through false applications and affidavits. The plaintiff requests that the court reject the defendant's application in the interest of justice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Statement of Objections For I.A No.6 Prasanna v. Madhava

    Uploaded by

    Sharath Kanzal
    191 views3 pages
    The plaintiff filed a statement of objections in response to an application filed by the defendant in a civil court case. The plaintiff argues that the defendant's application should be dismissed as it lacks merit and the allegations made are factually incorrect. Furthermore, the plaintiff asserts that the defendant is attempting to avoid furnishing a security payment of Rs. 19 lakh through false applications and affidavits. The plaintiff requests that the court reject the defendant's application in the interest of justice.

    Original Description:

    objection format

    Original Title

    Statement of Objections for I.A No.6 Prasanna v. Madhava

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The plaintiff filed a statement of objections in response to an application filed by the defendant in a civil court case. The plaintiff argues that the defendant's application should be dismissed as it lacks merit and the allegations made are factually incorrect. Furthermore, the plaintiff asserts that the defendant is attempting to avoid furnishing a security payment of Rs. 19 lakh through false applications and affidavits. The plaintiff requests that the court reject the defendant's application in the interest of justice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    191 views3 pages

    Statement of Objections For I.A No.6 Prasanna v. Madhava

    Uploaded by

    Sharath Kanzal
    The plaintiff filed a statement of objections in response to an application filed by the defendant in a civil court case. The plaintiff argues that the defendant's application should be dismissed as it lacks merit and the allegations made are factually incorrect. Furthermore, the plaintiff asserts that the defendant is attempting to avoid furnishing a security payment of Rs. 19 lakh through false applications and affidavits. The plaintiff requests that the court reject the defendant's application in the interest of justice.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    IN THE COURT OF THE CITY CIVIL COURT AND SESSIONS

    JUDGE AT BENGALURU

    O.S. NO.361/2020

    BETWEEN:

    Sri. H. Prasanna Kumar …Plaintiff

    AND

    Sri. D. Madhava Rao … Defendant

    STATEMENT OF OBJECTIONS FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF IN


    RESPECT OF I.A. No. 6 FILED BY THE DEFENDANT BY WAY
    OF AFFIDAVIT

    I, Prasanna Kumar H, aged about 73 years, S/of Late H. J


    Hanumantha Shetty, residing at No.573, III floor, Maruthi
    Elegence, 11th Main Road, 5th Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore –
    560041, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as under

    1. I am the Plaintiff in this suit and am well aware of the facts


    and circumstances of the suit. Hence I am swearing to this
    affidavit.
    2. I state that what all stated by me in the Plaint may please
    be read as part of parcel of this affidavit to avoid repletion
    3. I state that the I.A filed by the Defendant under Order VII
    Rule 11(d) read with section 151 of the C.P.C is void of
    merits and hence liable to be dismissed.
    4. I state that the averments of the Defendant made in his
    affidavit filed in support of the I.A. by the Defendants are
    factually incorrect and not admitted by me and hence the
    I.A. is liable to be rejected.
    5. I state that the defendant has only filed this application to
    hide himself from my I.A under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 R/W
    Section 151 of the C.P.C seeking to furnish security for a
    sum of Rs. 19,00,000/-( Rupees Nineteen Lakhs Only) and
    attachment to kitchen equipments, furniture at the suit
    schedule property.
    6. I state that I have taken over the possession of the suit
    schedule property as per the orders of this Hon’ble Court
    dated 10.06.2022 and have even produced the relevant
    photographs showing movable property of the defendants
    therein offered as security in terms of compliance of this
    Hon’ble Court in I.A. No.3 to furnish security for payment of
    arrears of rent of Rs. 19,00,000/-(Rupees Nineteen Lakh
    Only)
    7. I state that the inventory of the movable property of the
    defendants at the suit schedule property and proper
    valuation of the same has been made and which clearly
    shows that the security offered by the Defendant through
    his movable property is not worth the principle amount of
    Rs.19,00,000/-(Rupees Nineteen Lakh Only) but has only a
    scrap value of around Rs. 5,00,000/-.
    8. I state without prejudice, that the Defendant in the present
    case is falsely filing application for appointment of
    commissioner in order to conduct mahazar without
    producing any proof what so ever to show slabs, etc.
    9. I state that the Defendant is a habitual liar, files false and
    frivolous applications and cases, without even bothering
    about the consequences thereof and he has been making
    false affidavits before the courts suppressing the real facts
    and circumstances. Many court have rejected his, such
    applications and as the defendant has not filed present
    application with clean hands, the IA is liable to be rejected
    with heavy costs.

    Wherefore, in consideration of the above submissions, it is most


    humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court in the interest of Justice
    and Equity be pleased to be rejected and dismiss the I.A. No.4
    filed by the Defendant.

    “Identified by me”

    Advocate Deponent

    Date

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy