1) Students conducted an experiment to determine the effect of distance and shielding materials on radiation detection using a Geiger-Müller counter and three radioactive sources: Co-60, Cs-137, and Sr-90.
2) They found that the counts per minute (CPM) of each radioactive source decreased as the distance from the radiation monitor increased.
3) When shielding materials were added, CPM values further decreased. Lead provided the best shielding, followed by aluminum and plastic, which provided the least shielding.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views5 pages
Group8 - Experiment 1
1) Students conducted an experiment to determine the effect of distance and shielding materials on radiation detection using a Geiger-Müller counter and three radioactive sources: Co-60, Cs-137, and Sr-90.
2) They found that the counts per minute (CPM) of each radioactive source decreased as the distance from the radiation monitor increased.
3) When shielding materials were added, CPM values further decreased. Lead provided the best shielding, followed by aluminum and plastic, which provided the least shielding.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5
Experiment 1: Radiation Detection
Angel An Valenzuela, Stephanie Chloe Vitan, Kevin Linn Edric Yason, Venice Geraldie Yu
Department of Mathematics and Physics, College of Science,
University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1015
Abstract the three shielding materials, Lead showed
that it has the highest possibility of Ionizing Radiation emissions are shielding. invisible and extremely difficult to detect conventionally. To solve this problem, the 1. Introduction students made use of a Geiger-Müller Counter. This experiment aims to determine Radiation is any process that uses the plateau and optimal operating voltage of energy to transmit through space or through a Geiger-Müller Counter, the statistics such any medium. There are two types of as the Poisson and Gaussian distribution radiation: ionizing radiation and non- comparison in relation to the measurements ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation is of a Geiger-Müller Counter, and the produced when an energy carried by measurement of background radiation. radiation is enough to remove tightly bound Although the Geiger-Müller Counter (ST- electrons from an atom; this produces an 360 Counter) available in the laboratory ionized atom. Some examples are x-rays, was not able to function well, the students gamma rays, beta rays, etc. Contrarily, non- were able to find an alternative by detecting ionizing radiation is produced when an the effect of distance of the radioactive energy carried by radiation is not enough to sources: Co–60 (Gamma), Cs–137 (Beta produce an ionized atom. Examples are Gamma), and Sr–90 (Beta), with and light, radio waves, microwaves, etc. without shielding on the radiation or counts To detect and measure ionizing per minute (CPM) by the use of a digital radiation, a Geiger-Müller Counter may be radiation monitor. It was found that the used. The Geiger-Müller Counter was CPM of a radioactive source decreases as invented by German physicists Hans Geiger the distance of such source from the digital and E.W. Müller in 1928 in order to detect radiation monitor increases. Moreover, and measure ionizing radiations; these when shielding was added through the use include radioactive particles such as alpha of various materials, decrease in the and beta, and rays such as gamma and x. In radiation or CPM of all the radioactive this experiment, the students made use of a sources as compared to the CPM without Geiger-Müller Counter to determine its shielding was observed. Cs-137 (Beta plateau and optimal operating voltage, the Gamma) obtained the highest CPM while statistics such as the Poisson and Gaussian Co-60 (Gamma) obtained the lowest. Among distribution comparison in relation to the measurements of a Geiger-Müller Counter, rays, Alpha and Beta. Gamma and X- and the measurement of background ray have greater energy levels than those radiation. under ultraviolet or visible light. Alpha particles, positively charged helium nuclei, 2. Theory are relatively easier to block than others. By the use of a Geiger-Mueller (GM) Beta particles, negatively charged electrons, tube, the Radiation Monitor senses ionizing are harder to block. The density and radiation. Geiger-Mueller tube is a gas filled thickness of the shielding material are some detector which works on the principle that of the important things to consider for ionization of molecules in the air or gas radiation shielding. happen when radiation passes through air or specific gas that can easily be ionized like usually neon, argon, and halogen . This tube is a hollow cylinder through which the condition of gas is at low pressure. On one end of the tube, it has a window, made up of thin material called mica. Mica allows alpha particle to enter the tube. GM tube also has a central electrode inside of it. Across the covering of the tube and central electrode, a Figure 1: GM tube working principle high voltage supply is connected. The production of ions in the gas of the tube 3. Methodology happen when alpha, beta or gamma radiation enters the tube. These ions in the gas caused the tube to conduct and current is produced in the tube for a short time. The production of voltage pulse is due to the current. Every voltage pulse represents to one ionizing radiation. The voltage pulse produced is amplified and counted. The higher radiation entering the tube, corresponds to higher ionization inside the tube and therefore, higher number of counts. Figure 1 shows the Figure 2: Experimental set-up GM tube working principle. The experiment is composed of two Radiation shielding is established activities that were done to measure how the from the attenuation principle. It is the distance and shielding affect the radiation capacity to decrease a wave’s effect by count per minute of three radiation sources, blocking or bouncing particles through a Co-60, Sr-90, and Cs-132. Figure 2 shows barrier material. Some of the types of the experimental set-up. For the first radiation encountered are Gamma rays, X- activity, the radiation source was placed 8 92 266 225 2cm away from the radiation monitor. The 10 86 147 136 distance of the source from the monitor was 12 65 102 111 gradually increased every recording until the 14 55 98 100 source was 20cm away with 2cm increment 16 40 76 50 18 32 67 40 per batch. The count was recorded with its 20 28 54 35 corresponding distance from the radiation monitor. The same procedures were done for the three varying radiation sources. For the As the distance of the radioactive source second activity, same set up was done with changes from the digital radiation monitor, the first activity but with the presence of a the counts per minute (CPM) or radiation of shielding material. The three varying such radioactive source changes as well. shielding materials that were used were Table 1 shows that, for all radioactive Plastic, Aluminum, and Lead. The count per sources, the CPM of a radioactive source minute was recorded to determine how the decreases as the distance of such source shielding materials affect the radiation count from the digital radiation monitor increases. of the source. Furthermore, the most radioactive source comes from Cs-137 (Beta Gamma), while 4. Results and Discussion the least radioactive source is Co-60 Initially, the researchers were using (Gamma). the ST-360 Counter which was connected to Table 2. Effect of distance with shielding the computer. However, a technical on the radiation or counts per minute difficulty was encountered, specifically a (CPM) of the Co–60 (Gamma). malfunction of the Geiger-Müller Counter where no counts are being recorded as the voltage increases. Therefore, an alternative, Co–60 (Gamma) which was using an apparatus that measures Distance Plastic Aluminum Lead the radiation of a radioactive source, was (cm) (F) (P) (T) used. CPM CPM CPM 2 386 370 323 Table 1. Effect of distance without 4 168 162 128 shielding on the counts per minute (CPM) 6 138 101 86 of the radioactive sources. 8 83 79 65 10 70 55 41 Co–60 Cs–137 Sr–90 12 51 47 38 (Gamma) (Beta (Beta) 14 41 36 27 Gamma) 16 32 29 22 Distance CPM CPM CPM 18 24 20 17 (cm) 20 22 12 10 2 390 1557 1100 4 200 547 569 6 172 315 253 Three materials were used to shield the radiation of a radioactive source: Plastic, Table 3. Effect of distance with shielding Aluminum, and Lead. According to Tables on the radiation or counts per minute 2, 3 and 4, plastic exhibited the lowest (CPM) of the Cs–137 (Beta Gamma). capacity to shield the radiation while Lead Cs–137 showed the highest capacity to shield the (Beta radiation; such condition was evident to all Gamma) radioactive sources. Furthermore, Lead was Distance Plastic Aluminum Lead able to completely block or shield the (cm) (F) (P) (T) radiation of Sr-90 (Beta). CPM CPM CPM 2 1121 934 456 5. Conclusion 4 508 422 249 6 285 247 166 The group was able to find an 8 223 145 116 alternative method to know the counts per 10 173 124 83 minute (CPM) or radiation of a radioactive 12 124 83 62 material by using distance instead of 14 83 62 51 voltage. Shielding through the use of other 16 76 57 41 materials can decrease the radiation or 18 62 51 34 counts per minute (CPM) of a radioactive 20 55 34 20 source. The highest CPM belongs to Cs-137 (Beta Gamma) while the lowest belong to Table 4. Effect of distance with shielding Co-60 (Gamma). Among the three shielding on the radiation or counts per minute materials, Lead showed that it has the (CPM) of the Sr–90 (Beta). highest possibility of shielding. Furthermore, Lead was also able to Sr–90 completely shield Sr-90 (Beta). (Beta) Distance Plastic Aluminum Lead 6. References (cm) (F) (P) (T) CPM CPM CPM [1] Doss, H. M. (n.d.). Ionizing Radiation 2 690 47 0 and Humans – The Basics. Retrieved from 4 323 45 0 http://www.physicscentral.com/explore/actio 6 193 43 0 n/radiationandhumans.cfm 8 106 35 0 10 77 32 0 [2] Peshin, A. (2018). What Is a Geiger 12 69 30 0 Counter and How Does It Work? Retrieved 14 62 25 0 from 16 56 23 0 https://www.scienceabc.com/innovation/wha 18 53 20 0 20 48 15 0 t-is-a-geiger-counter-and-how-does-it- work.html [3] The Office of Human Radiation Experiments. (n.d.). What Is Radioactivity? Retrieved from https://ehss.energy.gov/ohre/roadmap/achre/ intro_9_1.html
[4] Nuclear radiation - Revision 5 - National
5 Physics - BBC Bitesize. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/bitesize/guides/zt9s2n b/revision/5
[5] Introduction to Radiation Detectors.
(n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.equipcoservices.com/support/tu torials/introduction-to-radiation-monitors/ [6] Materials Used in Radiation Shielding. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.thomasnet.com/articles/custom- manufacturing-fabricating/radiation- shielding-materials