Module 3 - Pre1 Aap

SELF-PACED LEARNING MODULE
COLLEGE DEPARTMENT
MODULE 3
Subject:
PRE1-AAP– AUDITING AND ASSURANCE

PRINCIPLES
AISAT COLLEGE – DASMARIÑAS, INC.
This material has been developed in support to the Higher Education Program
implementation. Materials included in this module are owned by the respective copyright
holders. AISAT College – Dasmariñas, the publisher and author do not represent nor claim
ownership over them.
This material will be reproduced for educational purposes and can be modified for the
purpose of translation into another language provided that the source must be clearly
acknowledged. Derivatives of the work including creating an edited version, enhancement or a
supplementary work are permitted provided all original works are acknowledged and the
copyright is attributed. No work may be derived from this material for commercial purposes and
profit.
Unit Philippine Standard on Auditing 210
Module Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements
AUDITING AND ASSURANCE Page |2
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
INFORMATION SHEET PR-3.3.1

“Philippine Standard on Auditing 210”
Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements
Learning objectives:
1. Discuss the terms of audit engagements.

2. Determine the terminologies that applies to audit engagements.
3. Determine the requirements on audit engagement.
4. Discuss the application of the audit engagement.
Introduction
Scope of this PSA
1. This Philippine Standard on Auditing (PSA) deals with the auditor’s responsibilities in agreeing
the terms of the audit engagement with management and, where appropriate, those charged
with governance. This includes establishing that certain preconditions for an audit,
responsibility for which rests with management and, where appropriate, those charged with
governance, are present. PSA 220 (Redrafted)1 deals with those aspects of engagement
acceptance that are within the control of the auditor. (Ref: Para. A1)
Effective Date
2. This PSA is effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after
December 15, 2009.
Objective
3. The objective of the auditor is to accept or continue an audit engagement only when the
basis upon which it is to be performed has been agreed, through: (
a) Establishing whether the preconditions for an audit are present; and
(b) Confirming that there is a common understanding between the auditor and management
and, where appropriate, those charged with governance of the terms of the audit engagement.
Definitions
4. For purposes of the PSAs, the following term has the meaning attributed below:
Preconditions for an audit – The use by management of an acceptable financial reporting

framework in the preparation of the financial statements and the agreement of management
SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
3 Meeting MS. EMERITA S.MERCADAL MR. WILBERT A. MAÑUSCA
Subject Teacher School Director
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
and, where appropriate, those charged with governance to the premise2 on which an audit is
conducted.
5. For the purposes of this PSA, references to “management” should be read hereafter as
“management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance.”
Requirements
Preconditions for an Audit
6. In order to establish whether the preconditions for an audit are present, the auditor shall:
(a) Determine whether the financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of
the financial statements is acceptable; and (Ref: Para. A2-A10)
(b) Obtain the agreement of management that it acknowledges and understands its
responsibility: (Ref: Para A11-A14, A20)
(i) For the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework, including where relevant their fair presentation; (Ref: Para. A15)
(ii) For such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation
of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error; and (Ref: Para. A16-A19)
(iii) To provide the auditor with:
a. Access to all information of which management is aware that is relevant to the preparation of
the financial statements such as records, documentation and other matters;
b. Additional information that the auditor may request from management for the purpose of
the audit; and
c. Unrestricted access to persons within the entity from whom the auditor determines it
necessary to obtain audit evidence.
Limitation on Scope Prior to Audit Engagement Acceptance
7. If management or those charged with governance impose a limitation on the scope of the
auditor’s work in the terms of a proposed audit engagement such that the auditor believes the
limitation will result in the auditor disclaiming an opinion on the financial statements, the
auditor shall not accept such a limited engagement as an audit engagement, unless required by
law or regulation to do so.
Other Factors Affecting Audit Engagement Acceptance
8. If the preconditions for an audit are not present, the auditor shall discuss the matter with
management. Unless required by law or regulation to do so, the auditor shall not accept the
proposed audit engagement:

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
(a) If the auditor has determined that the financial reporting framework to be applied in the
preparation of the financial statements is unacceptable, except as provided in paragraph 19; or
(b) If the agreement referred to in paragraph 6(b) has not been obtained.
Agreement on Audit Engagement Terms
9. The auditor shall agree the terms of the audit engagement with management or those
charged with governance, as appropriate. (Ref: Para. A21)
10. Subject to paragraph 11, the agreed terms of the audit engagement shall be recorded in an
audit engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement and shall include: (Ref:
Para. A22-A25)
(a) The objective and scope of the audit of the financial statements;
(b) The responsibilities of the auditor; (
c) The responsibilities of management;
(d) Identification of the applicable financial reporting framework for the preparation of the
financial statements; and
(e) Reference to the expected form and content of any reports to be issued by the auditor and a
statement that there may be circumstances in which a report may differ from its expected form
and content.
11. If law or regulation prescribes in sufficient detail the terms of the audit engagement
referred to in paragraph 10, the auditor need not record them in a written agreement, except
for the fact that such law or regulation applies and that management acknowledges and
understands its responsibilities as set out in paragraph 6(b). (Ref: Para. A22, A26-A27)
12. If law or regulation prescribes responsibilities of management similar to those described in

paragraph 6(b), the auditor may determine that the law or regulation includes responsibilities
that, in the auditor’s judgment, are equivalent in effect to those set out in that paragraph. For
such responsibilities that are equivalent, the auditor may use the wording of the law or
regulation to describe them in the written agreement. For those responsibilities that are not
prescribed by law or regulation such that their effect is equivalent, the written agreement shall
use the description in paragraph 6(b). (Ref: Para. A26)
Recurring Audits
13. On recurring audits, the auditor shall assess whether circumstances require the terms of the
audit engagement to be revised and whether there is a need to remind the entity of the existing
terms of the audit engagement. (Ref: Para. A28)

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
Acceptance of a Change in the Terms of the Audit Engagement
14. The auditor shall not agree to a change in the terms of the audit engagement where there is
no reasonable justification for doing so. (Ref: Para. A29-A31)
15. If, prior to completing the audit engagement, the auditor is requested to change the audit
engagement to an engagement that conveys a lower level of assurance, the auditor shall
determine whether there is reasonable justification for doing so. (Ref: Para. A32-A33)
16. If the terms of the audit engagement are changed, the auditor and management shall agree
on and record the new terms of the engagement in an engagement letter or other suitable form
of written agreement.
17. If the auditor is unable to agree to a change of the terms of the audit engagement and is not
permitted by management to continue the original audit engagement, the auditor shall:
(a) Withdraw from the audit engagement where possible under applicable law or regulation;
and
(b) Determine whether there is any obligation, either contractual or otherwise, to report the
circumstances to other parties, such as those charged with governance, owners or regulators.
Additional Considerations in Engagement Acceptance
Financial Reporting Standards Supplemented by Law or Regulation
18. If financial reporting standards established by an authorized or recognized standards setting

organization are supplemented by law or regulation, the auditor shall determine whether there
are any conflicts between the financial reporting standards and the additional requirements. If
such conflicts exist, the auditor shall discuss with management the nature of the additional
requirements and shall agree whether:
(a) The additional requirements can be met through additional disclosures in the financial
statements; or
(b) The description of the applicable financial reporting framework in the financial statements
can be amended accordingly.
If neither of the above actions is possible, the auditor shall determine whether it will be
necessary to modify the auditor’s opinion in accordance with PSA 705 (Revised and
Redrafted).3 (Ref: Para. A34)
Financial Reporting Framework Prescribed by Law or Regulation—Other Matters Affecting

Acceptance
19. If the auditor has determined that the financial reporting framework prescribed by law or
regulation would be unacceptable but for the fact that it is prescribed by law or regulation, the

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
auditor shall accept the audit engagement only if the following conditions are present: (Ref:
Para. A35)
(a) Management agrees to provide additional disclosures in the financial statements required
to avoid the financial statements being misleading; and
(b) It is recognized in the terms of the audit engagement that:
(i) The auditor’s report on the financial statements will incorporate an Emphasis of Matter
paragraph, drawing users’ attention to the additional disclosures, in accordance with PSA 706
(Revised and Redrafted);4 and
(ii) Unless the auditor is required by law or regulation to express the auditor’s opinion on the
financial statements by using the phrases “present fairly, in all material respects” in accordance
with the applicable financial reporting framework, the auditor’s opinion on the financial
statements will not include such phrases.
20. If the conditions outlined in paragraph 19 are not present and the auditor is required by law
or regulation to undertake the audit engagement, the auditor shall:
(a) Evaluate the effect of the misleading nature of the financial statements on the auditor’s
report; and
(b) Include appropriate reference to this matter in the terms of the audit engagement.
Auditor’s Report Prescribed by Law or Regulation
21. In some cases, law or regulation of the relevant jurisdiction prescribes the layout or wording
of the auditor’s report in a form or in terms that are significantly different from the
requirements of PSAs. In these circumstances, the auditor shall evaluate:
(a) Whether users might misunderstand the assurance obtained from the audit of the financial
statements and, if so,
(b) Whether additional explanation in the auditor’s report can mitigate possible
misunderstanding.
If the auditor concludes that additional explanation in the auditor’s report cannot mitigate
possible misunderstanding, the auditor shall not accept the audit engagement, unless required
by law or regulation to do so. An audit conducted in accordance with such law or regulation
does not comply with PSAs. Accordingly, the auditor shall not include any reference within the
auditor’s report to the audit having been conducted in accordance with PSAs.6 (Ref: Para. A36-
A37)
Application and Other Explanatory Material
Scope of this PSA (Ref: Para. 1)

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
A1. Assurance engagements, which include audit engagements, may only be accepted when the
practitioner considers that relevant ethical requirements such as independence and
professional competence will be satisfied, and when the engagement exhibits certain
characteristics.7 The auditor’s responsibilities in respect of ethical requirements in the context
of the acceptance of an audit engagement and in so far as they are within the control of the
auditor are dealt with in PSA 220 (Redrafted).8 This PSA deals with those matters (or
preconditions) that are within the control of the entity and upon which it is necessary for the
auditor and the entity’s management to agree.
Preconditions for an Audit
The Financial Reporting Framework (Ref: Para. 6(a))
A2. A condition for acceptance of an assurance engagement is that the criteria referred to in
the definition of an assurance engagement are suitable and available to intended users.9
Criteria are the benchmarks used to evaluate or measure the subject matter including, where
relevant, benchmarks for presentation and disclosure. Suitable criteria enable reasonably
consistent evaluation or measurement of a subject matter within the context of professional
judgment. For purposes of the PSAs, the applicable financial reporting framework provides the
criteria the auditor uses to audit the financial statements, including where relevant their fair
presentation.
A3 Without an acceptable financial reporting framework, management does not have an
appropriate basis for the preparation of the financial statements and the auditor does not have
suitable criteria for auditing the financial statements. In many cases the auditor may presume
that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable, as described in paragraphs A8-
A9.
Determining the Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework
A4. Factors that are relevant to the auditor’s determination of the acceptability of the financial
reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of the financial statements include:
• The nature of the entity (for example, whether it is a business enterprise, a public sector
entity or a not for profit organization);
• The purpose of the financial statements (for example, whether they are prepared to meet the
common financial information needs of a wide range of users or the financial information needs
of specific users);
• The nature of the financial statements (for example, whether the financial statements are a
complete set of financial statements or a single financial statement); and
• Whether law or regulation prescribes the applicable financial reporting framework.

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
A5. Many users of financial statements are not in a position to demand financial statements
tailored to meet their specific information needs. While all the information needs of specific
users cannot be met, there are financial information needs that are common to a wide range of
users. Financial statements prepared in accordance with a financial reporting framework
designed to meet the common financial information needs of a wide range of users are referred
to as general purpose financial statements.
A6. In some cases, the financial statements will be prepared in accordance with a financial
reporting framework designed to meet the financial information needs of specific users. Such
financial statements are referred to as special purpose financial statements. The financial
information needs of the intended users will determine the applicable financial reporting
framework in these circumstances. PSA 800 (Revised and Redrafted) discusses the acceptability
of financial reporting frameworks designed to meet the financial information needs of specific
users.10
A7. Deficiencies in the applicable financial reporting framework that indicate that the
framework is not acceptable may be encountered after the audit engagement has been
accepted. When use of that framework is prescribed by law or regulation, the requirements of
paragraphs 19-20 apply. When use of that framework is not prescribed by law or regulation,
management may decide to adopt another framework that is acceptable. When management
does so, as required by paragraph 16, new terms of the audit engagement are agreed to reflect
the change in the framework as the previously agreed terms will no longer be accurate.
General purpose frameworks
A8. At present, there is no objective and authoritative basis that has been generally recognized
globally for judging the acceptability of general purpose frameworks. In the absence of such a
basis, financial reporting standards established by organizations that are authorized or
recognized to promulgate standards to be used by certain types of entities are presumed to be
acceptable for general purpose financial statements prepared by such entities, provided the
organizations follow an established and transparent process involving deliberation and
consideration of the views of a wide range of stakeholders. Examples of such financial reporting
standards include:
• International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) promulgated by the International
Accounting Standards Board;
• Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRSs) issued by the Financial Reporting Standards
Council;
• International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs) promulgated by the International
Public Sector Accounting Standards Board; and
• Accounting principles promulgated by an authorized or recognized standards setting
organization in a particular jurisdiction, provided the organization follows an established and

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
transparent process involving deliberation and consideration of the views of a wide range of
stakeholders.
These financial reporting standards are often identified as the applicable financial reporting
framework in law or regulation governing the preparation of general purpose financial
statements. Financial reporting frameworks prescribed by law or regulation
A9. In accordance with paragraph 6(a), the auditor is required to determine whether the
financial reporting framework, to be applied in the preparation of the financial statements, is
acceptable. In some jurisdictions, law or regulation may prescribe the financial reporting
framework to be used in the preparation of general purpose financial statements for certain
types of entities. In the absence of indications to the contrary, such a financial reporting
framework is presumed to be acceptable for general purpose financial statements prepared by
such entities. In the event that the framework is not considered to be acceptable, paragraphs
19-20 apply.
Jurisdictions that do not have standards setting organizations or prescribed financial reporting
frameworks
A10. When an entity is registered or operating in a jurisdiction that does not have an authorized
or recognized standards setting organization, or where use of the financial reporting framework
is not prescribed by law or regulation, management identifies a financial reporting framework
to be applied in the preparation of the financial statements. Appendix 2 contains guidance on
determining the acceptability of financial reporting frameworks in such circumstances.
Agreement of the Responsibilities of Management (Ref: Para. 6(b))
A11. An audit in accordance with PSAs is conducted on the premise that management has
acknowledged and understands that it has the responsibilities set out in paragraph 6(b).11 In
certain jurisdictions, such responsibilities may be specified in law or regulation. In others, there
may be little or no legal or regulatory definition of such responsibilities. PSAs do not override
law or regulation in such matters. However, the concept of an independent audit requires that
the auditor’s role does not involve taking responsibility for the preparation of the financial
statements or for the entity’s related internal control, and that the auditor has a reasonable
expectation of obtaining the information necessary for the audit in so far as management is
able to provide or procure it. Accordingly, the premise is fundamental to the conduct of an
independent audit. To avoid misunderstanding, agreement is reached with management that it
acknowledges and understands that it has such responsibilities as part of agreeing and
recording the terms of the audit engagement in paragraphs 9-12.

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
AUDITING AND ASSURANCE P a g e | 10
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
A12. The way in which the responsibilities for financial reporting are divided between
management and those charged with governance will vary according to the resources and
structure of the entity and any relevant law or regulation, and the respective roles of
management and those charged with governance within the entity. In most cases, management
is responsible for execution while those charged with governance have oversight of
management. In some cases, those charged with governance will have, or will assume,
responsibility for approving the financial statements or monitoring the entity’s internal control
related to financial reporting. In larger or public entities, a subgroup of those charged with
governance, such as an audit committee, may be charged with certain oversight responsibilities.
A13. PSA 580 (Revised and Redrafted) requires the auditor to request management to provide
written representations that it has fulfilled certain of its responsibilities.12 It may therefore be
appropriate to make management aware that receipt of such written representations will be
expected, together with written representations required by other PSAs and, where necessary,
written representations to support other audit evidence relevant to the financial statements or
one or more specific assertions in the financial statements.
A14. Where management will not acknowledge its responsibilities, or agree to provide the
written representations, the auditor will be unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence.13 In such circumstances, it would not be appropriate for the auditor to accept the
audit engagement, unless law or regulation requires the auditor to do so. In cases where the
auditor is required to accept the audit engagement, the auditor may need to explain to
management the importance of these matters, and the implications for the auditor’s report.
Preparation of the Financial Statements (Ref: Para 6(b)(i))
A15. Most financial reporting frameworks include requirements relating to the presentation of
the financial statements; for such frameworks, preparation of the financial statements in
accordance with the financial reporting framework includes presentation. In the case of a fair
presentation framework the importance of the reporting objective of fair presentation is such
that the premise agreed with management includes specific reference to fair presentation in
accordance with the financial reporting framework.
Internal Control (Ref: Para. 6(b)(ii))
A16. Management maintains such internal control as it determines is necessary to enable the
preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error. Internal control, no matter how effective, can provide an entity with only
reasonable assurance about achieving the entity’s financial reporting objectives due to the
inherent limitations of internal control.14

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
A17. An independent audit conducted in accordance with the PSAs does not act as a substitute
for the maintenance of internal control necessary for the preparation of financial statements by
management. Accordingly, the auditor is required to obtain the agreement of management
that it acknowledges and understands its responsibility for internal control. However, the
agreement required by paragraph 6(b)(ii) does not imply that the auditor will find that internal
control maintained by management has achieved its purpose or will be free of deficiencies.
A18. It is for management to determine what internal control is necessary to enable the
preparation of the financial statements. The term “internal control” encompasses a wide range
of activities within components that may be described as the control environment; the entity’s
risk assessment process; the information system, including the related business processes
relevant to financial reporting, and communication; control activities; and monitoring of
controls. This division, however, does not necessarily reflect how a particular entity may design,
implement and maintain its internal control, or how it may classify any particular component.15
An entity’s internal control (in particular, its accounting books and records, or accounting
systems) will reflect the needs of management, the complexity of the business, the nature of
the risks to which the entity is subject, and relevant laws or regulation.
A19. In some jurisdictions, law or regulation may refer to the responsibility of management for
the adequacy of accounting books and records, or accounting systems. In some cases, general
practice may assume a distinction between accounting books and records or accounting
systems on the one hand, and internal control or controls on the other. As accounting books
and records, or accounting systems, are an integral part of internal control as referred to in
paragraph A18, no specific reference is made to them in paragraph 6(b)(ii) for the description of
the responsibility of management. To avoid misunderstanding, it may be appropriate for the
auditor to explain to management the scope of this responsibility.
Considerations Relevant to Smaller Entities (Ref: Para. 6(b))
A20. One of the purposes of agreeing the terms of the audit engagement is to avoid
misunderstanding about the respective responsibilities of management and the auditor. For
example, when a third party has assisted with the preparation of the financial statements, it
may be useful to remind management that the preparation of the financial statements in
accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework remains its responsibility.
Agreement on Audit Engagement Terms
Agreeing the Terms of the Audit Engagement (Ref: Para. 9)

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
A21. The roles of management and those charged with governance in agreeing the terms of the
audit engagement for the entity depend on the governance structure of the entity and relevant
law or regulation.
Audit Engagement Letter or Other Form of Written Agreement16 (Ref: Para. 10-11)
A22. It is in the interests of both the entity and the auditor that the auditor sends an audit
engagement letter before the commencement of the audit to help avoid misunderstandings
with respect to the audit. In some countries, however, the objective and scope of an audit and
the responsibilities of management and of the auditor may be sufficiently established by law,
that is, they prescribe the matters described in paragraph 10. Although in these circumstances
paragraph 11 permits the auditor to include in the engagement letter only reference to the fact
that relevant law or regulation applies and that management acknowledges and understands its
responsibilities as set out in paragraph 6(b), the auditor may nevertheless consider it
appropriate to include the matters described in paragraph 10 in an engagement letter for the
information of management.
Form and Content of the Audit Engagement Letter
A23. The form and content of the audit engagement letter may vary for each entity.
Information included in the audit engagement letter on the auditor’s responsibilities may be
based on PSA 200 (Revised and Redrafted).17 Paragraphs 6(b) and 12 of this PSA deal with the
description of the responsibilities of management. In addition to including the matters required
by paragraph 10, an audit engagement letter may make reference to, for example:
• Elaboration of the scope of the audit, including reference to applicable legislation,
regulations, PSAs, and ethical and other pronouncements of professional bodies to which the
auditor adheres.
• The form of any other communication of results of the audit engagement.
• The fact that because of the inherent limitations of an audit, together with the inherent
limitations of internal control, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements
may not be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance
with PSAs.
• Arrangements regarding the planning and performance of the audit, including the
composition of the audit team.
• The expectation that management will provide written representations (see also paragraph
A13).
• The agreement of management to make available to the auditor draft financial statements
and any accompanying other information in time to allow the auditor to complete the audit in
accordance with the proposed timetable.

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
• The agreement of management to inform the auditor of facts that may affect the financial
statements, of which management may become aware during the period from the date of the
auditor’s report to the date the financial statements are issued.
• The basis on which fees are computed and any billing arrangements.
• A request for management to acknowledge receipt of the audit engagement letter and to
agree to the terms of the engagement outlined therein.
A24. When relevant, the following points could also be made in the audit engagement letter:
• Arrangements concerning the involvement of other auditors and experts in some aspects of
the audit.
• Arrangements concerning the involvement of internal auditors and other staff of the entity.
• Arrangements to be made with the predecessor auditor, if any, in the case of an initial audit.
• Any restriction of the auditor’s liability when such possibility exists.
• A reference to any further agreements between the auditor and the entity.
• Any obligations to provide audit working papers to other parties.
An example of an audit engagement letter is set out in Appendix 1.

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
Audits of Components
A25. When the auditor of a parent entity is also the auditor of a component, the factors that
may influence the decision whether to send a separate audit engagement letter to the
component include the following:
• Who appoints the component auditor;
• Whether a separate auditor’s report is to be issued on the component;
• Legal requirements in relation to audit appointments;
• Degree of ownership by parent; and
• Degree of independence of the component management from the parent entity.
Responsibilities of Management Prescribed by Law or Regulation (Ref: Para. 11-12)
A26. If, in the circumstances described in paragraphs A22 and A27, the auditor concludes that it
is not necessary to record certain terms of the audit engagement in an audit engagement letter,
the auditor is still required by paragraph 11 to seek the written agreement from management
that it acknowledges and understands that it has the responsibilities set out in paragraph 6(b).
However, in accordance with paragraph 12, such written agreement may use the wording of
the law or regulation if such law or regulation establishes responsibilities for management that
are equivalent in effect to those described in paragraph 6(b). The accounting profession, audit
standards setter, or audit regulator in a jurisdiction may have provided guidance as to whether
the description in law or regulation is equivalent.
Considerations specific to public sector entities
A27. Law or regulation governing the operations of public sector audits generally mandate the
appointment of a public sector auditor and commonly set out the public sector auditor’s
responsibilities and powers, including the power to access an entity’s records and other
information. When law or regulation prescribes in sufficient detail the terms of the audit
engagement, the public sector auditor may nonetheless consider that there are benefits in
issuing a fuller audit engagement letter than permitted by paragraph 11.
Recurring Audits (Ref: Para. 13)
A28. The auditor may decide not to send a new audit engagement letter or other written
agreement each period. However, the following factors may make it appropriate to revise the
terms of the audit engagement or to remind the entity of existing terms:
• Any indication that the entity misunderstands the objective and scope of the audit.
• Any revised or special terms of the audit engagement.
• A recent change of senior management.

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
• A significant change in ownership.

• A significant change in nature or size of the entity’s business.
• A change in legal or regulatory requirements.
• A change in the financial reporting framework adopted in the preparation of the financial
statements.
• A change in other reporting requirements.
Acceptance of a Change in the Terms of the Audit Engagement
Request to Change the Terms of the Audit Engagement (Ref: Para. 14)
A29. A request from the entity for the auditor to change the terms of the audit engagement
may result from a change in circumstances affecting the need for the service, a
misunderstanding as to the nature of an audit as originally requested or a restriction on the
scope of the audit engagement, whether imposed by management or caused by other
circumstances. The auditor, as required by paragraph 14, considers the justification given for
the request, particularly the implications of a restriction on the scope of the audit engagement.
A30. A change in circumstances that affects the entity’s requirements or a misunderstanding

concerning the nature of the service originally requested may be considered a reasonable basis
for requesting a change in the audit engagement.
A31. In contrast, a change may not be considered reasonable if it appears that the change
relates to information that is incorrect, incomplete or otherwise unsatisfactory. An example
might be where the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding
receivables and the entity asks for the audit engagement to be changed to a review
engagement to avoid a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion.
Request to Change to a Review or a Related Service (Ref: Para. 15)
A32. Before agreeing to change an audit engagement to a review or a related service, an

auditor who was engaged to perform an audit in accordance with PSAs may need to assess, in
addition to the matters referred to in paragraphs A29-A31 above, any legal or contractual
implications of the change.
A33. If the auditor concludes that there is reasonable justification to change the audit
engagement to a review or a related service, the audit work performed to the date of change
may be relevant to the changed engagement; however, the work required to be performed and
the report to be issued would be those appropriate to the revised engagement. In order to
avoid confusing the reader, the report on the related service would not include reference to:

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
(a) The original audit engagement; or

(b) Any procedures that may have been performed in the original audit engagement, except
where the audit engagement is changed to an engagement to undertake agreed-upon
procedures and thus reference to the procedures performed is a normal part of the report.
Additional Considerations in Engagement Acceptance
Financial Reporting Standards Supplemented by Law or Regulation (Ref: Para. 18)
A34. In some jurisdictions, law or regulation may supplement the financial reporting standards
established by an authorized or recognized standards setting organization with additional
requirements relating to the preparation of financial statements. In those jurisdictions, the
applicable financial reporting framework for the purposes of applying the PSAs encompasses
both the identified financial reporting framework and such additional requirements provided
they do not conflict with the identified financial reporting framework. This may, for example, be
the case when law or regulation prescribes disclosures in addition to those required by the
financial reporting standards or when they narrow the range of acceptable choices that can be
made within the financial reporting standards.18
Financial Reporting Framework Prescribed by Law or Regulation—Other Matters Affecting

Acceptance (Ref: Para. 19)
A35. Law or regulation may prescribe that the wording of the auditor’s opinion use the phrases
“present fairly, in all material respects” in a case where the auditor concludes that the
applicable financial reporting framework prescribed by law or regulation would otherwise have
been unacceptable. In this case, the terms of the prescribed wording of the auditor’s report are
significantly different from the requirements of PSAs (see paragraph 21).
Auditor’s Report Prescribed by Law or Regulation (Ref: Para. 21)
A36. PSAs require that the auditor shall not represent compliance with PSAs unless the auditor
has complied with all of the PSAs relevant to the audit.19 19 When law or regulation prescribes
the layout or wording of the auditor’s report in a form or in terms that are significantly different
from the requirements of PSAs and the auditor concludes that additional explanation in the
auditor’s report cannot mitigate possible misunderstanding, the auditor may consider including
a statement in the auditor’s report that the audit is not conducted in accordance with PSAs. The
auditor is, however, encouraged to apply PSAs, including the PSAs that address the auditor’s
report, to the extent practicable, notwithstanding that the auditor is not permitted to refer to
the audit being conducted in accordance with PSAs.

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
Considerations Specific to Public Sector Entities
A37. In the public sector, specific requirements may exist within the legislation governing the
audit mandate; for example, the auditor may be required to report directly to a minister, the
legislature or the public if the entity attempts to limit the scope of the audit.
Acknowledgment
This PSA is based on International Standard on Auditing 210 (Redrafted), “Agreeing the Terms
of Audit Engagements,” issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.
There are no significant differences between this PSA 210 (Redrafted) and ISA 210 (Redrafted),
except for the deletion of footnote 23, Appendix 2 and footnotes 43, 44 and last sentence of
footnote 45 of the conforming amendments to PSA 700 (Redrafted), which do not apply in the
Philippines and are therefore not used.
Appendix 1 (Ref: Paras. A23-24)
Example of an Audit Engagement Letter
The following is an example of an audit engagement letter for an audit of general purpose
financial statements prepared in accordance with Philippine Financial Reporting Standards. This
letter is not authoritative but is intended only to be a guide that may be used in conjunction
with the considerations outlined in this PSA. It will need to be varied according to individual
requirements and circumstances. It is drafted to refer to the audit of financial statements for a
single reporting period and would require adaptation if intended or expected to apply to
recurring audits (see paragraph 13 of this PSA). It may be appropriate to seek legal advice that
any proposed letter is suitable.
***
To the appropriate representative of management or those charged with governance of ABC

Company:20
[The objective and scope of the audit]
You21 have requested that we audit the financial statements of ABC Company, which comprise
the balance sheet as at December 31, 20X1, and the income statement, statement of changes
in equity and cash flow statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
accounting policies and other explanatory information. We are pleased to confirm our
acceptance and our understanding of this audit engagement by means of this letter. Our audit
will be conducted with the objective of our expressing an opinion on the financial statements.
[The responsibilities of the auditor]
We will conduct our audit in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSAs). Those
standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material
misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the
auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the
financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of an audit, together with the inherent limitations of
internal control, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements may not be
detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with PSAs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20
The addressees and references in the letter would be those that are appropriate in the circumstances of the engagement,
including the relevant jurisdiction. It is important to refer to the appropriate persons – see paragraph A21.
21
Throughout this letter, references to “you,” “we,” “us,” “management,” “those charged with governance” and “auditor”
would be used or amended as appropriate in the circumstances.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In making our risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entity’s
preparation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate
in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the entity’s internal control. However, we will communicate to you in writing concerning any
significant deficiencies in internal control relevant to the audit of the financial statements that
we have identified during the audit.
[The responsibilities of management and identification of the applicable financial reporting

framework (for purposes of this example it is assumed that the auditor has not determined that
the law or regulation prescribes those responsibilities in appropriate terms; the descriptions in
paragraph 6(b) of this PSA are therefore used).]
Our audit will be conducted on the basis that [management and, where appropriate, those
charged with governance]22 acknowledge and understand that they have responsibility:
(a) For the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with
Philippine Financial Reporting Standards;23
MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
(b) For such internal control as [management] determines is necessary to enable the
preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error; and
(c) To provide us with:
(i) Access to all information of which [management] is aware that is relevant to the preparation
of the financial statements such as records, documentation and other matters;
(ii) Additional information that we may request from [management] for the purpose of the
audit; and
(iii) Unrestricted access to persons within the entity from whom we determine it necessary to
obtain audit evidence.
As part of our audit process, we will request from [management and, where appropriate, those
charged with governance], written confirmation concerning representations made to us in
connection with the audit.
We look forward to full cooperation from your staff during our audit.
[Other relevant information]
[Insert other information, such as fee arrangements, billings and other specific terms, as
appropriate.]
[Reporting]
[Insert appropriate reference to the expected form and content of the auditor’s report.]
The form and content of our report may need to be amended in the light of our audit findings.
Please sign and return the attached copy of this letter to indicate your acknowledgement of,
and agreement with, the arrangements for our audit of the financial statements including our
respective responsibilities.
XYZ & Co.
Acknowledged and agreed on behalf of ABC Company by
(signed)
......................
Name and Title

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
Date

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
REFERENCES:
1. PSA 210 – Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements (2007). Auditing and Assurance Standards
Council. Retrieved from https://www.aasc.org.ph/downloads/PSA/publications/psa-210.php.

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
SELF-CHECK PR-3.3.1
Instruction: Discuss the following:
1. What is the overall objective of the auditor (PSA 200)?

2. What action the auditor should do if the auditor failed to achieve the objective in the
relevant PSA (PSA 200)?
3. Discuss the timeliness of financial reporting and the balance between benefit and cost (PSA
200).
4. Discuss the scope of agreeing the terms of audit engagements (PSA 210).
5. What are the preconditions for an audit (PSA 210)?
6. Discuss the acceptance of a change in the terms of the audit engagement (PSA 210).
7. Discuss the auditor’s report prescribed by law or regulation (PSA 210).
8.

MODULE 3rd
PRELIM
PRE1-AAP Units: 3
PRINCIPLES
SELF-CHECK ANSWER KEY PR-3.3.1


MODULE 3rd
PRELIM

Module 3 - Pre1 Aap

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Module 3 - Pre1 Aap

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Module 3 - Pre1 Aap

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SELF-PACED LEARNING MODULE

PRE1-AAP– AUDITING AND ASSURANCE

AISAT COLLEGE – DASMARIÑAS, INC.

INFORMATION SHEET PR-3.3.1

1. Discuss the terms of audit engagements.

Scope of this PSA

Preconditions for an audit – The use by management of an acceptable financial reporting

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

Preconditions for an Audit

Limitation on Scope Prior to Audit Engagement Acceptance

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

Agreement on Audit Engagement Terms

12. If law or regulation prescribes responsibilities of management similar to those described in

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

Acceptance of a Change in the Terms of the Audit Engagement

Additional Considerations in Engagement Acceptance

Financial Reporting Standards Supplemented by Law or Regulation

18. If financial reporting standards established by an authorized or recognized standards setting

Financial Reporting Framework Prescribed by Law or Regulation—Other Matters Affecting

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

Auditor’s Report Prescribed by Law or Regulation

Application and Other Explanatory Material

Scope of this PSA (Ref: Para. 1)

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

Preconditions for an Audit

The Financial Reporting Framework (Ref: Para. 6(a))

Determining the Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

General purpose frameworks

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

Agreement of the Responsibilities of Management (Ref: Para. 6(b))

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

Internal Control (Ref: Para. 6(b)(ii))

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

Considerations Relevant to Smaller Entities (Ref: Para. 6(b))

Agreement on Audit Engagement Terms

Agreeing the Terms of the Audit Engagement (Ref: Para. 9)

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

Form and Content of the Audit Engagement Letter

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

An example of an audit engagement letter is set out in Appendix 1.

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

Responsibilities of Management Prescribed by Law or Regulation (Ref: Para. 11-12)

Considerations specific to public sector entities

Recurring Audits (Ref: Para. 13)

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

• A significant change in ownership.

Acceptance of a Change in the Terms of the Audit Engagement

A30. A change in circumstances that affects the entity’s requirements or a misunderstanding

Request to Change to a Review or a Related Service (Ref: Para. 15)

A32. Before agreeing to change an audit engagement to a review or a related service, an

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

(a) The original audit engagement; or

Additional Considerations in Engagement Acceptance

Financial Reporting Standards Supplemented by Law or Regulation (Ref: Para. 18)

Financial Reporting Framework Prescribed by Law or Regulation—Other Matters Affecting

Auditor’s Report Prescribed by Law or Regulation (Ref: Para. 21)

SUBJECT TEACHER: APPROVED FOR IMPLEMENTATION:

Considerations Specific to Public Sector Entities