Module 1 SIP
Module 1 SIP
Procedures
Part 1: Brainstorming of Concepts from the Community (9 points)
1. Identify Concepts. Explore your community and its observable concepts. Identify 3 concepts
that you think have a great impact on the community.
2. Stating the Motive. The purpose of selecting the concepts shall be described in this part.
Example: Example:
Face Masks The community uses face masks a lot and sometimes it makes us
wonder what other effects it has on us humans and our environment?
1.
2.
3.
Part 2: Identifying & Dissecting 3 Main Concepts and Formulating Testable Questions &
Objectives (21 points)
Take note: When thinking about the dissected topics, make sure to have a clear vision of testing out the
group’s topic in a laboratory/school setting. The SIP is also project-based, so make sure that your group
will come up with a topic that you can create a product, device, or prototype that can be tested.
1. Identify. From the concepts that your group has identified, choose 1 major concept that you find
more interesting than the others.
2. Dissecting. Further dissect the things that can be observed more from the concept chosen. What
specific problems could arise in this concept? How can you help the community solve this
problem? What are you curious about the main concept?
3. Select. Select 1 topic from the dissected parts of the main concept. It will be better to choose the
topic that is testable with experiments, and most importantly, feasible.
4. Raise Testable Questions. Raise a minimum of 3 testable questions that are centered on the
selected topic.
5. Formulate Objectives. After creating the questions, form a main objective or goal of your
research. Then, follow it up with specific objectives in line with the testable questions.
impacts of using
face masks to the
skin.
Criteria 5 4 3 2
Organization Very logical, coherent Generally logical, A bit scattered but Rather hard to follow,
and complete mostly coherent, acceptable, somewhat significant omissions
generally complete coherent, occasionally and/or substitutions
scrambled, some
noticeable omissions but
still understandable
Presentation Clear, precise, Mostly clear, good grasp Occasional confusion or A lot of confusion, not
convincing, articulate, of material, only lack of clarity, occasional in control of facts, and
good audience occasional stumbles, gaps in theory or key details, very
connection minor uncertainty on important details, nervous and stiff,
some facts or details somewhat nervous or frequently at a loss for
jittery words
Interaction
Clearly understood the Adequate understanding Weak but acceptable Lacked adequate
with topic proposed, and of topic proposed, understanding of topic understanding of the
material could aptly generally understood proposed, could present topic proposed,
contextualize or objectives, perhaps a bit the objectives but not objectives &questions
interpret the objectives reluctant to attempt to always clear on are not always
extend theory or explain implications, occasionally understood, confused
the purpose of choosing confused details or or uncertain about the
the concept important concepts implications of the
proposed product,
contradictions or
confusion evident in
how the material is
handled
Total: __ /20