HL Paper 2 Answers
HL Paper 2 Answers
HL Paper 2 Answers
Ethanedioic acid is a diprotic acid. A student determined the value of x in the formula of hydrated ethanedioic acid, , by
0.795 g of ethanedioic acid was dissolved in distilled water and made up to a total volume of 250 cm3 in a volumetric flask.
of this ethanedioic acid solution was pipetted into a flask and titrated against aqueous sodium hydroxide using phenolphthalein as an
indicator.
The titration was then repeated twice to obtain the results below.
a. Calculate the average volume of NaOH added, in , in titrations 2 and 3, and then calculate the amount, in mol, of NaOH added. [2]
b.i. The equation for the reaction taking place in the titration is: [1]
Determine the amount, in mol, of ethanedioic acid that reacts with the average
volume of NaOH(aq).
b.ii.Determine the amount, in mol, of ethanedioic acid present in of the original solution. [1]
e. Predict and explain the difference in carbon-oxygen bond lengths in ethanedioic acid and its conjugate base, . [3]
Markscheme
a.
b.i.
b.ii.
b.iii.
b.iv. and ;
c. hydrogen bonding;
d.
1;
e. Acid:
one double and one single bond / one shorter and one longer bond;
Conjugate base:
Examiners report
a. It was suggested that, in the second paragraph, we should have explicitly stated that “0.795 g of hydrated ethanedioic acid was dissolved…” We
agree that this would have clarified even more the question but we believe the sense is clear from the actual question for any student with practical
experience. Another teacher suggested that the question was too easy. This was not apparent in the answers seen with very few candidates
Most had little problem with (a) but some averaged all three readings. In (b) candidates found the calculation at the beginning of the paper difficult
and many gave up too early in the sequence. “Error carried forward” marks were available even if an error was made early on. In (c), most were
able to identify hydrogen bonding successfully. The diagrams of the Lewis structure of ethanedioic in (d) acid were, in general, poor; the most
common error was to omit the lone pairs on the O of . Very few candidates were able to give a good explanation of electron delocalization
and the differences in bond lengths in ethanedioic acid and the ethanedioate ion. As one respondent suggested, candidates would have benefitted
from drawing out the Lewis structure of . We did not ask for this but there was nothing preventing them from doing so.
b.i. It was suggested that, in the second paragraph, we should have explicitly stated that “0.795 g of hydrated ethanedioic acid was dissolved…” We
agree that this would have clarified even more the question but we believe the sense is clear from the actual question for any student with practical
experience. Another teacher suggested that the question was too easy. This was not apparent in the answers seen with very few candidates
Most had little problem with (a) but some averaged all three readings. In (b) candidates found the calculation at the beginning of the paper difficult
and many gave up too early in the sequence. “Error carried forward” marks were available even if an error was made early on. In (c), most were
able to identify hydrogen bonding successfully. The diagrams of the Lewis structure of ethanedioic in (d) acid were, in general, poor; the most
common error was to omit the lone pairs on the O of . Very few candidates were able to give a good explanation of electron delocalization
and the differences in bond lengths in ethanedioic acid and the ethanedioate ion. As one respondent suggested, candidates would have benefitted
from drawing out the Lewis structure of . We did not ask for this but there was nothing preventing them from doing so.
b.ii.It was suggested that, in the second paragraph, we should have explicitly stated that “0.795 g of hydrated ethanedioic acid was dissolved…” We
agree that this would have clarified even more the question but we believe the sense is clear from the actual question for any student with practical
experience. Another teacher suggested that the question was too easy. This was not apparent in the answers seen with very few candidates
Most had little problem with (a) but some averaged all three readings. In (b) candidates found the calculation at the beginning of the paper difficult
and many gave up too early in the sequence. “Error carried forward” marks were available even if an error was made early on. In (c), most were
able to identify hydrogen bonding successfully. The diagrams of the Lewis structure of ethanedioic in (d) acid were, in general, poor; the most
common error was to omit the lone pairs on the O of . Very few candidates were able to give a good explanation of electron delocalization
and the differences in bond lengths in ethanedioic acid and the ethanedioate ion. As one respondent suggested, candidates would have benefitted
from drawing out the Lewis structure of . We did not ask for this but there was nothing preventing them from doing so.
b.iii.It was suggested that, in the second paragraph, we should have explicitly stated that “0.795 g of hydrated ethanedioic acid was dissolved…” We
agree that this would have clarified even more the question but we believe the sense is clear from the actual question for any student with practical
experience. Another teacher suggested that the question was too easy. This was not apparent in the answers seen with very few candidates
Most had little problem with (a) but some averaged all three readings. In (b) candidates found the calculation at the beginning of the paper difficult
and many gave up too early in the sequence. “Error carried forward” marks were available even if an error was made early on. In (c), most were
able to identify hydrogen bonding successfully. The diagrams of the Lewis structure of ethanedioic in (d) acid were, in general, poor; the most
common error was to omit the lone pairs on the O of . Very few candidates were able to give a good explanation of electron delocalization
and the differences in bond lengths in ethanedioic acid and the ethanedioate ion. As one respondent suggested, candidates would have benefitted
from drawing out the Lewis structure of . We did not ask for this but there was nothing preventing them from doing so.
b.iv.It was suggested that, in the second paragraph, we should have explicitly stated that “0.795 g of hydrated ethanedioic acid was dissolved…” We
agree that this would have clarified even more the question but we believe the sense is clear from the actual question for any student with practical
experience. Another teacher suggested that the question was too easy. This was not apparent in the answers seen with very few candidates
Most had little problem with (a) but some averaged all three readings. In (b) candidates found the calculation at the beginning of the paper difficult
and many gave up too early in the sequence. “Error carried forward” marks were available even if an error was made early on. In (c), most were
able to identify hydrogen bonding successfully. The diagrams of the Lewis structure of ethanedioic in (d) acid were, in general, poor; the most
common error was to omit the lone pairs on the O of . Very few candidates were able to give a good explanation of electron delocalization
and the differences in bond lengths in ethanedioic acid and the ethanedioate ion. As one respondent suggested, candidates would have benefitted
from drawing out the Lewis structure of . We did not ask for this but there was nothing preventing them from doing so.
c. It was suggested that, in the second paragraph, we should have explicitly stated that “0.795 g of hydrated ethanedioic acid was dissolved…” We
agree that this would have clarified even more the question but we believe the sense is clear from the actual question for any student with practical
experience. Another teacher suggested that the question was too easy. This was not apparent in the answers seen with very few candidates
Most had little problem with (a) but some averaged all three readings. In (b) candidates found the calculation at the beginning of the paper difficult
and many gave up too early in the sequence. “Error carried forward” marks were available even if an error was made early on. In (c), most were
able to identify hydrogen bonding successfully. The diagrams of the Lewis structure of ethanedioic in (d) acid were, in general, poor; the most
common error was to omit the lone pairs on the O of . Very few candidates were able to give a good explanation of electron delocalization
and the differences in bond lengths in ethanedioic acid and the ethanedioate ion. As one respondent suggested, candidates would have benefitted
from drawing out the Lewis structure of . We did not ask for this but there was nothing preventing them from doing so.
d. It was suggested that, in the second paragraph, we should have explicitly stated that “0.795 g of hydrated ethanedioic acid was dissolved…” We
agree that this would have clarified even more the question but we believe the sense is clear from the actual question for any student with practical
experience. Another teacher suggested that the question was too easy. This was not apparent in the answers seen with very few candidates
Most had little problem with (a) but some averaged all three readings. In (b) candidates found the calculation at the beginning of the paper difficult
and many gave up too early in the sequence. “Error carried forward” marks were available even if an error was made early on. In (c), most were
able to identify hydrogen bonding successfully. The diagrams of the Lewis structure of ethanedioic in (d) acid were, in general, poor; the most
common error was to omit the lone pairs on the O of . Very few candidates were able to give a good explanation of electron delocalization
and the differences in bond lengths in ethanedioic acid and the ethanedioate ion. As one respondent suggested, candidates would have benefitted
from drawing out the Lewis structure of . We did not ask for this but there was nothing preventing them from doing so.
e. It was suggested that, in the second paragraph, we should have explicitly stated that “0.795 g of hydrated ethanedioic acid was dissolved…” We
agree that this would have clarified even more the question but we believe the sense is clear from the actual question for any student with practical
experience. Another teacher suggested that the question was too easy. This was not apparent in the answers seen with very few candidates
Most had little problem with (a) but some averaged all three readings. In (b) candidates found the calculation at the beginning of the paper difficult
and many gave up too early in the sequence. “Error carried forward” marks were available even if an error was made early on. In (c), most were
able to identify hydrogen bonding successfully. The diagrams of the Lewis structure of ethanedioic in (d) acid were, in general, poor; the most
common error was to omit the lone pairs on the O of . Very few candidates were able to give a good explanation of electron delocalization
and the differences in bond lengths in ethanedioic acid and the ethanedioate ion. As one respondent suggested, candidates would have benefitted
from drawing out the Lewis structure of . We did not ask for this but there was nothing preventing them from doing so.
The vapour pressure of water changes with temperature according to the graph below.
a. A liquid boils when its vapour pressure equals atmospheric pressure. Determine the boiling point of water on a mountaintop on a day when the [1]
c. (i) A sample of liquid bromine was left in a closed conical (Erlenmeyer) flask at 298 K and allowed to reach a state of equilibrium. State an [3]
(ii) The temperature of the closed flask was increased and the system was allowed to reach a new equilibrium. Compare the equilibrium
formed at the new temperature with the equilibrium at the original temperature on the molecular level.
Markscheme
a. 87 (°C);
(ii) more (molecules in the) vapour / fewer molecules in the liquid at new equilibrium / OWTTE;
molecules have more energy/move faster/collide more frequently at the new temperature / OWTTE;
Accept converse points for the flask at lower temperature for M1, M2 and M3.
Examiners report
a. A very well answered question.
b. Most candidates presented a curve that was steeper than the water vapour curve gaining the mark. However, most of the candidates started from
the same vapour pressure as water at 0 °C which was not penalized. Very few candidates drew an accurate curve.
c. (i) This question was not well answered. Only a few candidates were able to give an appropriate observation. Many candidates could state the
characteristics of a system in equilibrium but did not apply their knowledge to state an observation.
(ii) Only a few candidates gave adequate explanations gaining two marks. Many obtained one mark for saying that more molecules will be in the
gaseous state. The reference to “molecular level” often went unnoticed.
In acidic solution, ions containing titanium can react according to the half-equation below.
In the diagram below, A and B are inert electrodes and, in the aqueous solutions, all ions have a concentration of .
Sodium, silicon and sulfur are elements in period 3 of the periodic table that all form oxides.
Although carbon and silicon both belong to group 4 of the periodic table, carbon dioxide and silicon dioxide are different in many ways.
b.i. State the initial and final oxidation numbers of titanium and hence deduce whether it is oxidized or reduced in this change. [2]
b.ii.Considering the above equilibrium, predict, giving a reason, how adding more acid would affect the strength of the ion as an oxidizing [2]
agent.
c. In the two experiments below, predict whether a reaction would occur and deduce an equation for any reaction that takes place. Refer to Table [3]
d.i. Using Table 14 of the Data Booklet, state the balanced half-equation for the reaction that occurs at electrode A and whether it involves [2]
oxidation or reduction.
• the direction in which the positive ions flow in the salt bridge.
e.i. Compare the properties of the three oxides by completing the table below. [3]
e.ii.Sulfur dioxide is a significant contributor to acid deposition. Identify a major, man-made source of this pollutant. [1]
e.iii.As well as the oxide above, sodium forms a peroxide that contains the peroxide ion, . Draw the Lewis (electron dot) structure of the [2]
peroxide ion.
f.i. Describe the differences in the hybridization of these group 4 elements and the precise nature of the bonds that they form with the oxygen [3]
atoms.
f.ii. Xenon, although a noble gas, forms an oxide, , that has a structure related to that of . Compare the geometry around the silicon [3]
atoms in with the geometry around the xenon atoms in , using the valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) theory.
Markscheme
a. potential of the half-cell / reduction half-reaction under standard conditions measured relative to standard hydrogen electrode/SHE;
Allow instead of standard conditions, solute concentration of 1 mol dm–3 or 1 bar/1 atm (pressure) for gases.
b.i.
+ sign must be present. Do not award mark for incorrect notation 4, 4+, 3, 3+ etc.
(more would) drive/shift equilibrium to the right/towards products (accepting more electrons);
no reaction;
balanced equation;
d.i. ;
reduction;
d.ii. ;
Accept arrows above or below each provided it is obvious which they refer to.
e.i.
For any parts (properties) where mark not awarded, award [1] for every three correct responses.
e.iii.
e-pairs correct;
Accept .
Award [1 max] for last two marking points for “C–O double bond and Si–O single bond”.
Examiners report
a. The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
b.i. The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
b.ii.The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
c. The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
d.i. The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
d.ii.The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
d.iii.The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
e.i. The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
e.ii.The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
e.iii.The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
f.i. The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
f.ii. The required definition and the effect of acid on the oxidizing power of was often well done, though it proved a challenge for some
candidates, and most could interpret the change in terms of oxidation numbers. Very few candidates could use values to predict whether a
reaction with another half-cell would occur and even less could correctly combine the half-equations to produce a balanced equation for the overall
reaction. Relatively few candidates managed to gain full marks for the questions relating to the voltaic cell illustrated, with the different parts
appearing to be of approximately equal difficulty. The nature of the period 3 oxides was generally well appreciated, though often the effect on pH
was expressed as, for example, “basic” rather than “increases”. In spite of the efficiency of modern plants many considered the contact process to
be a major source of sulfur dioxide pollution, rather than combustion of coal and other “high sulfur” fossil fuels. The comparison of the structure of
silicon dioxide to those of carbon and xenon dioxides was poorly done, the root cause often being a lack of awareness of the structure of silicon
dioxide. Many candidates could however write correct equations for the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with water.
The equilibrium that occurs when antimony(V) fluoride is dissolved in liquid hydrogen fluoride can be represented by the equation below.
Outline how the following factors account for the fact that HCl is a strong acid and HF is a weak acid.
Some students were provided with a solution of a monobasic acid, HQ, and given the problem of determining whether HQ was a
The second problem set for the students was to determine the acid dissociation constant, , of the acid HQ and its .
a. State the element that you would expect to have chemical properties most similar to those of antimony. [1]
b.i. Describe the relationship between and in terms of the Lewis theory of acids. [2]
c.ii.The interaction between an undissociated hydrogen halide molecule and a water molecule. [1]
d.i. Neelu and Charles decided to solve the problem by determining the volume of sodium hydroxide solution needed to neutralize [2]
Indicator:
Reason:
d.iii.Neelu and Charles decided to compare the volume of sodium hydroxide solution needed with those required by known strong [1]
and weak acids. Unfortunately they chose sulfuric acid as the strong acid. Outline why this was an unsuitable choice.
d.iv.Francisco and Shamiso decided to measure the pH of the initial solution, HQ, and they found that its pH was 3.7. Deduce, giving a reason, the [2]
e.i. Explain how the could be determined from a graph of pH against the volume of sodium hydroxide added. [2]
e.ii.Francisco and Shamiso found that the pH of the initial solution was 3.7. However, this reading was inaccurate because they [4]
forgot to wash the pH probe. Calculate the of HQ using the reading they obtained.
Markscheme
a. arsenic/As;
Accept bismuth/Bi.
c.i. H–F bond stronger than H–Cl bond / H–Cl bond weaker than H–F bond;
requires same volume of base / the amount/volume to react/for neutralization does not depend on the acid strength;
d.iv.weak;
e.i. when volume of alkali is half equivalence volume/volume required for neutralization;
e.ii. ;
Examiners report
a. Most students could identify an element which would be expected to have similar properties to antimony and the reaction between its fluoride and
hydrogen fluoride was generally well interpreted in terms of acid-base theories, though hardly any students realized that HF is acting as both a
base (to give ) and an acid (to give which complexes with ). The significance of the strength of the hydrogen-halogen bond on the
strength of the hydrogen halides was often appreciated though very few seemed to realize that HF hydrogen bonds to water whereas HCl does
not. Many students think that weak acids require a smaller volume of alkali for neutralization than strong acids of equal concentration, though most
could correctly identify an appropriate indicator for the titration and justify their choice. Most realized that sulfuric acid was dibasic, were aware of
the significance of the pH at the half equivalence point and correctly identified HQ as a weak acid, though justifying this proved more of a
challenge. Quite a few students gained full credit the calculation of the from the initial pH and many gained some marks for the calculation of
b.i. Most students could identify an element which would be expected to have similar properties to antimony and the reaction between its fluoride and
hydrogen fluoride was generally well interpreted in terms of acid-base theories, though hardly any students realized that HF is acting as both a
base (to give ) and an acid (to give which complexes with ). The significance of the strength of the hydrogen-halogen bond on the
strength of the hydrogen halides was often appreciated though very few seemed to realize that HF hydrogen bonds to water whereas HCl does
not. Many students think that weak acids require a smaller volume of alkali for neutralization than strong acids of equal concentration, though most
could correctly identify an appropriate indicator for the titration and justify their choice. Most realized that sulfuric acid was dibasic, were aware of
the significance of the pH at the half equivalence point and correctly identified HQ as a weak acid, though justifying this proved more of a
challenge. Quite a few students gained full credit the calculation of the from the initial pH and many gained some marks for the calculation of
b.ii.Most students could identify an element which would be expected to have similar properties to antimony and the reaction between its fluoride and
hydrogen fluoride was generally well interpreted in terms of acid-base theories, though hardly any students realized that HF is acting as both a
base (to give ) and an acid (to give which complexes with ). The significance of the strength of the hydrogen-halogen bond on the
strength of the hydrogen halides was often appreciated though very few seemed to realize that HF hydrogen bonds to water whereas HCl does
not. Many students think that weak acids require a smaller volume of alkali for neutralization than strong acids of equal concentration, though most
could correctly identify an appropriate indicator for the titration and justify their choice. Most realized that sulfuric acid was dibasic, were aware of
the significance of the pH at the half equivalence point and correctly identified HQ as a weak acid, though justifying this proved more of a
challenge. Quite a few students gained full credit the calculation of the from the initial pH and many gained some marks for the calculation of
c.i. Most students could identify an element which would be expected to have similar properties to antimony and the reaction between its fluoride and
hydrogen fluoride was generally well interpreted in terms of acid-base theories, though hardly any students realized that HF is acting as both a
base (to give ) and an acid (to give which complexes with ). The significance of the strength of the hydrogen-halogen bond on the
strength of the hydrogen halides was often appreciated though very few seemed to realize that HF hydrogen bonds to water whereas HCl does
not. Many students think that weak acids require a smaller volume of alkali for neutralization than strong acids of equal concentration, though most
could correctly identify an appropriate indicator for the titration and justify their choice. Most realized that sulfuric acid was dibasic, were aware of
the significance of the pH at the half equivalence point and correctly identified HQ as a weak acid, though justifying this proved more of a
challenge. Quite a few students gained full credit the calculation of the from the initial pH and many gained some marks for the calculation of
c.ii.Most students could identify an element which would be expected to have similar properties to antimony and the reaction between its fluoride and
hydrogen fluoride was generally well interpreted in terms of acid-base theories, though hardly any students realized that HF is acting as both a
base (to give ) and an acid (to give which complexes with ). The significance of the strength of the hydrogen-halogen bond on the
strength of the hydrogen halides was often appreciated though very few seemed to realize that HF hydrogen bonds to water whereas HCl does
not. Many students think that weak acids require a smaller volume of alkali for neutralization than strong acids of equal concentration, though most
could correctly identify an appropriate indicator for the titration and justify their choice. Most realized that sulfuric acid was dibasic, were aware of
the significance of the pH at the half equivalence point and correctly identified HQ as a weak acid, though justifying this proved more of a
challenge. Quite a few students gained full credit the calculation of the from the initial pH and many gained some marks for the calculation of
d.i. Most students could identify an element which would be expected to have similar properties to antimony and the reaction between its fluoride and
hydrogen fluoride was generally well interpreted in terms of acid-base theories, though hardly any students realized that HF is acting as both a
base (to give ) and an acid (to give which complexes with ). The significance of the strength of the hydrogen-halogen bond on the
strength of the hydrogen halides was often appreciated though very few seemed to realize that HF hydrogen bonds to water whereas HCl does
not. Many students think that weak acids require a smaller volume of alkali for neutralization than strong acids of equal concentration, though most
could correctly identify an appropriate indicator for the titration and justify their choice. Most realized that sulfuric acid was dibasic, were aware of
the significance of the pH at the half equivalence point and correctly identified HQ as a weak acid, though justifying this proved more of a
challenge. Quite a few students gained full credit the calculation of the from the initial pH and many gained some marks for the calculation of
d.ii.Most students could identify an element which would be expected to have similar properties to antimony and the reaction between its fluoride and
hydrogen fluoride was generally well interpreted in terms of acid-base theories, though hardly any students realized that HF is acting as both a
base (to give ) and an acid (to give which complexes with ). The significance of the strength of the hydrogen-halogen bond on the
strength of the hydrogen halides was often appreciated though very few seemed to realize that HF hydrogen bonds to water whereas HCl does
not. Many students think that weak acids require a smaller volume of alkali for neutralization than strong acids of equal concentration, though most
could correctly identify an appropriate indicator for the titration and justify their choice. Most realized that sulfuric acid was dibasic, were aware of
the significance of the pH at the half equivalence point and correctly identified HQ as a weak acid, though justifying this proved more of a
challenge. Quite a few students gained full credit the calculation of the from the initial pH and many gained some marks for the calculation of
d.iii.Most students could identify an element which would be expected to have similar properties to antimony and the reaction between its fluoride and
hydrogen fluoride was generally well interpreted in terms of acid-base theories, though hardly any students realized that HF is acting as both a
base (to give ) and an acid (to give which complexes with ). The significance of the strength of the hydrogen-halogen bond on the
strength of the hydrogen halides was often appreciated though very few seemed to realize that HF hydrogen bonds to water whereas HCl does
not. Many students think that weak acids require a smaller volume of alkali for neutralization than strong acids of equal concentration, though most
could correctly identify an appropriate indicator for the titration and justify their choice. Most realized that sulfuric acid was dibasic, were aware of
the significance of the pH at the half equivalence point and correctly identified HQ as a weak acid, though justifying this proved more of a
challenge. Quite a few students gained full credit the calculation of the from the initial pH and many gained some marks for the calculation of
d.iv.Most students could identify an element which would be expected to have similar properties to antimony and the reaction between its fluoride and
hydrogen fluoride was generally well interpreted in terms of acid-base theories, though hardly any students realized that HF is acting as both a
base (to give ) and an acid (to give which complexes with ). The significance of the strength of the hydrogen-halogen bond on the
strength of the hydrogen halides was often appreciated though very few seemed to realize that HF hydrogen bonds to water whereas HCl does
not. Many students think that weak acids require a smaller volume of alkali for neutralization than strong acids of equal concentration, though most
could correctly identify an appropriate indicator for the titration and justify their choice. Most realized that sulfuric acid was dibasic, were aware of
the significance of the pH at the half equivalence point and correctly identified HQ as a weak acid, though justifying this proved more of a
challenge. Quite a few students gained full credit the calculation of the from the initial pH and many gained some marks for the calculation of
e.i. Most students could identify an element which would be expected to have similar properties to antimony and the reaction between its fluoride and
hydrogen fluoride was generally well interpreted in terms of acid-base theories, though hardly any students realized that HF is acting as both a
base (to give ) and an acid (to give which complexes with ). The significance of the strength of the hydrogen-halogen bond on the
strength of the hydrogen halides was often appreciated though very few seemed to realize that HF hydrogen bonds to water whereas HCl does
not. Many students think that weak acids require a smaller volume of alkali for neutralization than strong acids of equal concentration, though most
could correctly identify an appropriate indicator for the titration and justify their choice. Most realized that sulfuric acid was dibasic, were aware of
the significance of the pH at the half equivalence point and correctly identified HQ as a weak acid, though justifying this proved more of a
challenge. Quite a few students gained full credit the calculation of the from the initial pH and many gained some marks for the calculation of
hydrogen fluoride was generally well interpreted in terms of acid-base theories, though hardly any students realized that HF is acting as both a
base (to give ) and an acid (to give which complexes with ). The significance of the strength of the hydrogen-halogen bond on the
strength of the hydrogen halides was often appreciated though very few seemed to realize that HF hydrogen bonds to water whereas HCl does
not. Many students think that weak acids require a smaller volume of alkali for neutralization than strong acids of equal concentration, though most
could correctly identify an appropriate indicator for the titration and justify their choice. Most realized that sulfuric acid was dibasic, were aware of
the significance of the pH at the half equivalence point and correctly identified HQ as a weak acid, though justifying this proved more of a
challenge. Quite a few students gained full credit the calculation of the from the initial pH and many gained some marks for the calculation of
c.i. Apply the Aufbau principle to state the full electron configuration for an atom of phosphorus. [1]
c.iii.Predict the shapes and the bond angles in the two molecules. [4]
c.v.Compare the melting points of and and explain the difference. [3]
d.ii.State and explain the acid–base character of according to the Lewis theory. [2]
e. Explain the delocalization of electrons using the molecule as an example, including two facts that support the delocalization. [4]
Markscheme
c.i. ;
c.ii.
;
c.iii.
Shape and bond angle must be consistent with the number of electron domains given in the diagram in (ii).
c.iv. (hybridization);
Award [1 max] for answers suggesting PCl3 has higher melting point because it is polar and PCl5 is not.
d.ii.Lewis base;
e. overlap of orbitals / electrons of double/ bond and non-bonding/lone pair on oxygen interact / OWTTE;
;
Examiners report
c.i. The electron configuration of phosphorus was successfully answered (even by apparently weaker candidates) and there were many good answers
for the Lewis structures. Candidates would do well to draw the “dots” clearly remembering that their answer will be scanned. They should group
the electron dots neatly in pairs (much easier for the examiner to count, for one thing) or use a line to represent an electron pair. The usual errors
occurred namely missing lone pairs on P and/or Cl atoms.
c.ii.The electron configuration of phosphorus was successfully answered (even by apparently weaker candidates) and there were many good answers
for the Lewis structures. Candidates would do well to draw the “dots” clearly remembering that their answer will be scanned. They should group
the electron dots neatly in pairs (much easier for the examiner to count, for one thing) or use a line to represent an electron pair. The usual errors
c.iii.The shapes and angles in (iii) were patchy but there were also some impressive answers.
c.iv.About half knew that was the answer to (iv) and in (v) about half based their explanation on the dipole moment in . (One mark was allowed
for those who recognized that would be polar whilst would not – thus suggesting that had the higher melting point.) Candidates
were expected to know the order of melting points as this had been studied in 13.1.1. Very few were able to write a balanced equation for the
c.v.About half knew that was the answer to (iv) and in (v) about half based their explanation on the dipole moment in . (One mark was allowed
for those who recognized that would be polar whilst would not – thus suggesting that had the higher melting point.) Candidates
were expected to know the order of melting points as this had been studied in 13.1.1. Very few were able to write a balanced equation for the
d.i. Many failed to note that a Lewis acid is an electron pair acceptor and the definition was often muddled with that of Brønsted-Lowry.
e. In (e) there was little discussion of overlap of orbitals, some of resonance but hardly any evidence in terms of equal bond length and equal bond
A class studied the equilibrium established when ethanoic acid and ethanol react together in the presence of a strong acid, using propanone as an
After one week, a sample of the final equilibrium mixture was pipetted out and titrated with aqueous sodium
hydroxide to determine the amount of ethanoic acid remaining. The following titration results were obtained:
a. The density of ethanoic acid is . Determine the amount, in mol, of ethanoic acid present in the initial mixture. [3]
b. The concentration of ethanoic acid can be calculated as . Determine the percentage uncertainty of this value. (Neglect any [3]
c.i. Calculate the absolute uncertainty of the titre for Titration 1 ( ). [1]
c.ii.Suggest the average volume of alkali, required to neutralize the sample, that the student should use. [1]
c.iii. of the aqueous sodium hydroxide reacted with the hydrochloric acid present in the sample. Determine the [2]
c.v.The other concentrations in the equilibrium mixture were calculated as follows: [1]
Use these data, along with your answer to part (iii), to determine the value of the equilibrium constant. (If you did not obtain an answer to part
(iii), assume the concentrations of ethanol and ethanoic acid are equal, although this is not the case.)
d. Outline how you could establish that the system had reached equilibrium at the end of one week. [1]
e. Outline why changing the temperature has only a very small effect on the value of the equilibrium constant for this equilibrium. [1]
f. Outline how adding some ethyl ethanoate to the initial mixture would affect the amount of ethanoic acid converted to product. [2]
g. Propanone is used as the solvent because one compound involved in the equilibrium is insoluble in water. Identify this compound and explain [2]
h. Suggest one other reason why using water as a solvent would make the experiment less successful. [1]
Markscheme
a. ;
Accept 60 (g mol–1).
c.i. ;
c.ii. ;
c.iii. ;
If other methods used, award M1 for calculating amount of NaOH reacting with CH3COOH.
If (ii) given as mean titre (26.5 cm3) then ECF answer comes to 0.94 (mol dm–3).
c.iv. ;
Accept .
c.v. ;
If assumed [CH3COOH] = 0.884 mol dm-3, answer is 1.91 – allow this even if an answer was obtained for (iii).
If (ii) given as mean titre (26.5 cm3) then ECF answer comes to 1.79.
d. repeat the titration a day/week later (and result should be the same) / OWTTE;
Allow “does not hydrogen bond to water” / “hydrocarbon sections too long” / OWTTE.
h. (large excess of) water will shift the position of equilibrium (far to the left) / OWTTE;
Accept any other chemically sound response, such as “dissociation of ethanoic acid would affect equilibrium”.
Examiners report
a. Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
b. Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
c.i. Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
c.ii.Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
c.iii.Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
c.iv.Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
c.v.Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
d. Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
e. Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
f. Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
g. Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
h. Generally candidates found this question quite challenging and some left quite a number of parts unanswered. The tradition is that the first
question on the paper is a data response question, which often addresses many aspects of the syllabus, and unfortunately candidates, especially
those of average or below average ability, seem to have difficulty in tackling questions of this nature. One other issue with data response questions
is that, of necessity, the data appears at the beginning of the question whilst, mainly because of the space left for candidates to answer, the later
parts of the question referring to these data may not appear until a number of pages into the paper.
Part (a) concerning density, volume and amount of substance was generally reasonably well answered, but the following parts, concerning
uncertainties, were rarely answered correctly and a number confused precision (uncertainty, either absolute or as a percentage) and accuracy
(percentage error in the value obtained). Many candidates also seemed to lack experimental common sense, simply taking an average that
included an initial titre that was much larger than the concordant second and third titres, rather than excluding it. This lack of experimental “know
how” was also evident in responses to (c) (iii) where it was unusual for the approach to the question to indicate the candidate had realised that the
alkali was neutralising two different acids (HCl and ) and again in part (d) where it was rare for the response to outline a practical
solution to the problem, though quite a number of candidates suggested that the pH would become constant, presumably not realising that the pH
would be dominated by the HCl catalyst. Most students could however carry out the more routine tasks of writing an equilibrium constant
expression and determining its value from the data given. Many candidates were aware of Le Chatelier effects on the position of equilibrium, but a
significant number failed to use this information to answer the question actually asked and the unusual approach to the effect of temperature
disconcerted many. Whilst most students managed to identify the ester as the component of the mixture that was insoluble in water, the reasons
given were usually couched in terms of the polarity of the molecule (many quite polar molecules, halogenoalkanes for example, are insoluble in
water) rather than its inability to form strong hydrogen bonds to water, which is the critical factor. Quite a number of students came up with a valid
reason why water would not be a suitable solvent, though some students appeared to have overlooked the fact the question stated “other reason”.
a. State an equation for the formation of ethanol from ethene and the necessary reaction conditions. [3]
Equation:
Conditions:
b.i. Define the term average bond enthalpy. [2]
b.ii.Ethanol can be used as a fuel. Determine the enthalpy of combustion of ethanol at 298 K, in , using the values in table 10 of the data [4]
c. Students can also measure the enthalpy of combustion of ethanol in the laboratory using calorimetry. Suggest the major source of systematic [1]
d. State the equation for the acid-catalysed reaction of ethanol with propanoic acid and state the name of the organic product. [2]
Equation:
e.i. A polyester can be formed when ethane-1,2-diol reacts with benzene-1,4-dicarboxylic acid. [2]
Deduce the structure of the repeating unit and state the other product formed.
Repeating unit:
Other product:
f.i. The standard enthalpy change of combustion, , of propanoic acid is . Determine the standard enthalpy change of [4]
formation of propanoic acid, in , using this information and data from table 12 of the data booklet.
f.ii. Deduce, giving a reason, the sign of the standard entropy change of the system for the formation of propanoic acid from its elements. [2]
Markscheme
a. Equation:
Conditions:
Accept phosphoric acid/ (on pellets of silicon dioxide) (for industrial preparation).
Accept high pressure (for industrial preparation) for M3 only if is given for M2.
b.i. energy needed to break (1 mol of) a bond in the gaseous state/phase;
(averaged over) similar compounds;
b.ii. ;
Bonds broken:
Bonds made:
d. ;
ethyl propanoate;
;
Other product:
/water;
e.ii.condensation;
f.i. ;
OR
f.ii. negative;
g. Allotropes:
diamond
graphite
fullerene
graphene;
Structures:
Diamond:
tetrahedral arrangement of (carbon) atoms/each carbon bonded to four others / and 3D/covalent network structure;
Graphite:
each carbon bonded to three others (in a trigonal planar arrangement) / and 2D / layers of (carbon) atoms;
Fullerene:
each (carbon) atom bonded to three others (in a trigonal arrangement) / and joined in a ball/cage/sphere/connected hexagons and pentagons;
Accept “trigonal planar” for “each carbon atom bonded to three others” part in M4.
Graphene:
each carbon bonded to three others (in a trigonal arrangement) / and 2D structure;
Examiners report
a. There was poor understanding of the transformation in (a). When defining the average bond enthalpy in (b), the notion of “gaseous” was frequently
omitted and very few mentioned the bonds being in similar compounds. In the calculation, many omitted the C–C bond and many did not work
from a properly balanced equation which led to disaster. Nearly every candidate attempting this question was able to suggest “heat loss”. In (d) the
usual errors were made; the name was the wrong way round, water was missing from the equation and wrong products (such as pentanoic acid)
were suggested. In (e) (i) the diagrams were poor but water was usually given correctly. Most gave condensation as the type of polymerization. The
key to gaining marks in questions such as (f) (i) is to start with a balanced equation, [1 mark], and then set the calculation out correctly and tidily.
Part marks cannot be given if the examiner cannot follow what the candidate is doing. Many correctly gave “negative” in (ii) but the explanations
lacked clarity. Most gained a mark in (g) for knowing three allotropes but the description of structures was poorly done. The [4] (marks) for this part
b.i. There was poor understanding of the transformation in (a). When defining the average bond enthalpy in (b), the notion of “gaseous” was frequently
omitted and very few mentioned the bonds being in similar compounds. In the calculation, many omitted the C–C bond and many did not work
from a properly balanced equation which led to disaster. Nearly every candidate attempting this question was able to suggest “heat loss”. In (d) the
usual errors were made; the name was the wrong way round, water was missing from the equation and wrong products (such as pentanoic acid)
were suggested. In (e) (i) the diagrams were poor but water was usually given correctly. Most gave condensation as the type of polymerization. The
key to gaining marks in questions such as (f) (i) is to start with a balanced equation, [1 mark], and then set the calculation out correctly and tidily.
Part marks cannot be given if the examiner cannot follow what the candidate is doing. Many correctly gave “negative” in (ii) but the explanations
lacked clarity. Most gained a mark in (g) for knowing three allotropes but the description of structures was poorly done. The [4] (marks) for this part
b.ii.There was poor understanding of the transformation in (a). When defining the average bond enthalpy in (b), the notion of “gaseous” was frequently
omitted and very few mentioned the bonds being in similar compounds. In the calculation, many omitted the C–C bond and many did not work
from a properly balanced equation which led to disaster. Nearly every candidate attempting this question was able to suggest “heat loss”. In (d) the
usual errors were made; the name was the wrong way round, water was missing from the equation and wrong products (such as pentanoic acid)
were suggested. In (e) (i) the diagrams were poor but water was usually given correctly. Most gave condensation as the type of polymerization. The
key to gaining marks in questions such as (f) (i) is to start with a balanced equation, [1 mark], and then set the calculation out correctly and tidily.
Part marks cannot be given if the examiner cannot follow what the candidate is doing. Many correctly gave “negative” in (ii) but the explanations
lacked clarity. Most gained a mark in (g) for knowing three allotropes but the description of structures was poorly done. The [4] (marks) for this part
c. There was poor understanding of the transformation in (a). When defining the average bond enthalpy in (b), the notion of “gaseous” was frequently
omitted and very few mentioned the bonds being in similar compounds. In the calculation, many omitted the C–C bond and many did not work
from a properly balanced equation which led to disaster. Nearly every candidate attempting this question was able to suggest “heat loss”. In (d) the
usual errors were made; the name was the wrong way round, water was missing from the equation and wrong products (such as pentanoic acid)
were suggested. In (e) (i) the diagrams were poor but water was usually given correctly. Most gave condensation as the type of polymerization. The
key to gaining marks in questions such as (f) (i) is to start with a balanced equation, [1 mark], and then set the calculation out correctly and tidily.
Part marks cannot be given if the examiner cannot follow what the candidate is doing. Many correctly gave “negative” in (ii) but the explanations
lacked clarity. Most gained a mark in (g) for knowing three allotropes but the description of structures was poorly done. The [4] (marks) for this part
d. There was poor understanding of the transformation in (a). When defining the average bond enthalpy in (b), the notion of “gaseous” was frequently
omitted and very few mentioned the bonds being in similar compounds. In the calculation, many omitted the C–C bond and many did not work
from a properly balanced equation which led to disaster. Nearly every candidate attempting this question was able to suggest “heat loss”. In (d) the
usual errors were made; the name was the wrong way round, water was missing from the equation and wrong products (such as pentanoic acid)
were suggested. In (e) (i) the diagrams were poor but water was usually given correctly. Most gave condensation as the type of polymerization. The
key to gaining marks in questions such as (f) (i) is to start with a balanced equation, [1 mark], and then set the calculation out correctly and tidily.
Part marks cannot be given if the examiner cannot follow what the candidate is doing. Many correctly gave “negative” in (ii) but the explanations
lacked clarity. Most gained a mark in (g) for knowing three allotropes but the description of structures was poorly done. The [4] (marks) for this part
omitted and very few mentioned the bonds being in similar compounds. In the calculation, many omitted the C–C bond and many did not work
from a properly balanced equation which led to disaster. Nearly every candidate attempting this question was able to suggest “heat loss”. In (d) the
usual errors were made; the name was the wrong way round, water was missing from the equation and wrong products (such as pentanoic acid)
were suggested. In (e) (i) the diagrams were poor but water was usually given correctly. Most gave condensation as the type of polymerization. The
key to gaining marks in questions such as (f) (i) is to start with a balanced equation, [1 mark], and then set the calculation out correctly and tidily.
Part marks cannot be given if the examiner cannot follow what the candidate is doing. Many correctly gave “negative” in (ii) but the explanations
lacked clarity. Most gained a mark in (g) for knowing three allotropes but the description of structures was poorly done. The [4] (marks) for this part
e.ii.There was poor understanding of the transformation in (a). When defining the average bond enthalpy in (b), the notion of “gaseous” was frequently
omitted and very few mentioned the bonds being in similar compounds. In the calculation, many omitted the C–C bond and many did not work
from a properly balanced equation which led to disaster. Nearly every candidate attempting this question was able to suggest “heat loss”. In (d) the
usual errors were made; the name was the wrong way round, water was missing from the equation and wrong products (such as pentanoic acid)
were suggested. In (e) (i) the diagrams were poor but water was usually given correctly. Most gave condensation as the type of polymerization. The
key to gaining marks in questions such as (f) (i) is to start with a balanced equation, [1 mark], and then set the calculation out correctly and tidily.
Part marks cannot be given if the examiner cannot follow what the candidate is doing. Many correctly gave “negative” in (ii) but the explanations
lacked clarity. Most gained a mark in (g) for knowing three allotropes but the description of structures was poorly done. The [4] (marks) for this part
f.i. There was poor understanding of the transformation in (a). When defining the average bond enthalpy in (b), the notion of “gaseous” was frequently
omitted and very few mentioned the bonds being in similar compounds. In the calculation, many omitted the C–C bond and many did not work
from a properly balanced equation which led to disaster. Nearly every candidate attempting this question was able to suggest “heat loss”. In (d) the
usual errors were made; the name was the wrong way round, water was missing from the equation and wrong products (such as pentanoic acid)
were suggested. In (e) (i) the diagrams were poor but water was usually given correctly. Most gave condensation as the type of polymerization. The
key to gaining marks in questions such as (f) (i) is to start with a balanced equation, [1 mark], and then set the calculation out correctly and tidily.
Part marks cannot be given if the examiner cannot follow what the candidate is doing. Many correctly gave “negative” in (ii) but the explanations
lacked clarity. Most gained a mark in (g) for knowing three allotropes but the description of structures was poorly done. The [4] (marks) for this part
f.ii. There was poor understanding of the transformation in (a). When defining the average bond enthalpy in (b), the notion of “gaseous” was frequently
omitted and very few mentioned the bonds being in similar compounds. In the calculation, many omitted the C–C bond and many did not work
from a properly balanced equation which led to disaster. Nearly every candidate attempting this question was able to suggest “heat loss”. In (d) the
usual errors were made; the name was the wrong way round, water was missing from the equation and wrong products (such as pentanoic acid)
were suggested. In (e) (i) the diagrams were poor but water was usually given correctly. Most gave condensation as the type of polymerization. The
key to gaining marks in questions such as (f) (i) is to start with a balanced equation, [1 mark], and then set the calculation out correctly and tidily.
Part marks cannot be given if the examiner cannot follow what the candidate is doing. Many correctly gave “negative” in (ii) but the explanations
lacked clarity. Most gained a mark in (g) for knowing three allotropes but the description of structures was poorly done. The [4] (marks) for this part
g. There was poor understanding of the transformation in (a). When defining the average bond enthalpy in (b), the notion of “gaseous” was frequently
omitted and very few mentioned the bonds being in similar compounds. In the calculation, many omitted the C–C bond and many did not work
from a properly balanced equation which led to disaster. Nearly every candidate attempting this question was able to suggest “heat loss”. In (d) the
usual errors were made; the name was the wrong way round, water was missing from the equation and wrong products (such as pentanoic acid)
were suggested. In (e) (i) the diagrams were poor but water was usually given correctly. Most gave condensation as the type of polymerization. The
key to gaining marks in questions such as (f) (i) is to start with a balanced equation, [1 mark], and then set the calculation out correctly and tidily.
Part marks cannot be given if the examiner cannot follow what the candidate is doing. Many correctly gave “negative” in (ii) but the explanations
lacked clarity. Most gained a mark in (g) for knowing three allotropes but the description of structures was poorly done. The [4] (marks) for this part
Two hydrides of nitrogen are ammonia and hydrazine, . One derivative of ammonia is methanamine whose molecular structure is shown below.
Hydrazine is used to remove oxygen from water used to generate steam or hot water.
a. Estimate the H−N−H bond angle in methanamine using VSEPR theory. [1]
b. State the electron domain geometry around the nitrogen atom and its hybridization in methanamine. [2]
d.i. Hydrazine reacts with water in a similar way to ammonia. (The association of a molecule of hydrazine with a second H+ is so small it can be [3]
neglected.)
Calculate the pH of a solution of hydrazine.
d.ii.Suggest a suitable indicator for the titration of hydrazine solution with dilute sulfuric acid using section 22 of the data booklet. [1]
e. Outline, using an ionic equation, what is observed when magnesium powder is added to a solution of ammonium chloride. [2]
f. Determine the enthalpy change of reaction, , in kJ, when 1.00 mol of gaseous hydrazine decomposes to its elements. Use bond enthalpy [3]
g. The standard enthalpy of formation of is . Calculate the enthalpy of vaporization, , of hydrazine in . [2]
(If you did not get an answer to (f), use but this is not the correct answer.)
h.i. Calculate, showing your working, the mass of hydrazine needed to remove all the dissolved oxygen from of the sample. [3]
h.ii.Calculate the volume, in , of nitrogen formed under SATP conditions. (The volume of 1 mol of gas = at SATP.) [1]
Markscheme
a. 107°
Literature value = 105.8°
[1 mark]
b. tetrahedral
sp3
No ECF allowed.
[2 marks]
c. removes/reacts with
[2 marks]
OR
pH « » = 10.1
Give appropriate credit for other methods containing errors that do not yield correct final answer.
[3 marks]
d.ii.methyl red
OR
bromocresol green
OR
bromophenol blue
OR
methyl orange
[1 mark]
e. bubbles
OR
gas
OR
magnesium disappears
[2 marks]
f. bonds broken:
E(N–N) + 4E(N–H)
OR
bonds formed:
E(N N) + 2E(H–H)
OR
g.
OR
Award [2] for correct final answer. Award [1 max] for –44 «kJ mol–1».
[2 marks]
OR
[3 marks]
h.ii.
[1 mark]
Examiners report
a. [N/A]
b. [N/A]
[N/A]
c.
d.i. [N/A]
d.ii.[N/A]
[N/A]
e.
f. [N/A]
g. [N/A]
[N/A]
h.i.
h.ii.[N/A]
An organic compound, X, with a molar mass of approximately contains 54.5% carbon, 36.3% oxygen and 9.2% hydrogen by mass.
a.vii.
Predict and explain the bond lengths and bond strengths of the carbon-oxygen bonds in . [3]
(ii) Describe the hybridization of the carbon atom in methane and explain how the concept of hybridization can be used to explain the shape
of the methane molecule.
(iii) Identify the hybridization of the carbon atoms in diamond and graphite and explain why graphite is an electrical conductor.
c.i. Aluminium chloride, , does not conduct electricity when molten but aluminium oxide, , does. Explain this in terms of the structure [4]
Markscheme
a.vii.
bond length and bond strength identical for both carbon to oxygen bonds;
Accept use of Data Booklet values of bond lengths and bond enthalpies.
b. (i) mixing/joining together/combining/merging of (atomic) orbitals to form molecular/new orbitals (of equal energy);
(ii) ;
(iii) diamond:
graphite:
c.i. Al2Cl6:
Al2O3:
determined the empirical and molecular formulas and correctly drew the structural formula of the carboxylic acid. Fewer candidates could correctly
draw the structural formula of an ester. Identification of the stronger and longer carbon-oxygen bond was answered correctly by nearly all
candidates, but explaining the bond lengths in the propanoate ion was only answered correctly by the very best candidates. Even those who
realized that the electrons are delocalized did not give a complete explanation and often scored only 2 marks out of 3.
b. In part (b) many candidates struggled to define hybridization, frequently referring to overlapping of orbitals. Most could state that the carbon atom
in methane is hybridized and that the molecule is tetrahedral, but few gave detailed responses about electron configurations or repulsion of
electron pairs. However, most candidates correctly identified the hybridization of carbon in diamond and graphite, and explained why graphite
c.i. In (c) few candidates knew that is a covalent compound and that is ionic. Some answers mentioned many types of bonding for one
compound.
In December 2010, researchers in Sweden announced the synthesis of N,N–dinitronitramide, . They speculated that this compound, more
commonly called trinitramide, may have significant potential as an environmentally friendly rocket fuel oxidant.
a. Methanol reacts with trinitramide to form nitrogen, carbon dioxide and water. Deduce the coefficients required to balance the equation for this [1]
reaction.
c. Calculate the enthalpy change, in , when one mole of trinitramide decomposes to its elements, using bond enthalpy data from Table [3]
10 of the Data Booklet. Assume that all the N–O bonds in this molecule have a bond enthalpy of .
d. The entropy change, , for the decomposition of trinitramide has been estimated as . Comment on the sign of . [2]
e. Using as the value for the entropy change, along with your answer to part (c), calculate , in , for this reaction [3]
at 300 K. (If you did not obtain an answer for part (c), then use the value , but this is not the correct value.)
f. Explain how changing the temperature will affect whether or not the decomposition of trinitramide is spontaneous. [2]
g. Outline how the length of the N–N bond in trinitramide compares with the N–N bond in nitrogen gas, . [2]
h. Deduce the N–N–N bond angle in trinitramide and explain your reasoning. [3]
Markscheme
a. ;
c. bonds broken: ;
bonds made: ;
enthalpy change: ;
Accept –234 kJ mol–1 which arise from students assuming that 305 kJ mol–1 refers to the strength of a single N–O bond. Students may then take
N=O from the data book value (587 kJ mol–1).
bonds broken: (3 305) + (3 587) + (3 158) = 915 + 1761 + 474 = 3150 (kJ mol–1)
Award [2 max] for correct calculation of the enthalpy change of reaction for the equation in part (a), which gives –2160 (kJ mol–1).
Award [1] if the final answer is not –2160 but the candidate has correctly calculated the bonds broken in trinitramide as 2304 (kJ mol–1).
Award [1 max] for answers stating that positive value indicates an increase in disorder/randomness.
e. ;
If no answer to part (c), using = –1000 kJ mol–1, gives –1020 (kJ mol–1).
negative at all temperatures / exothermic/ negative and involves an increase in entropy/ positive;
g. (N–N bond in) trinitramide is longer/nitrogen (gas) is shorter / 0.145 nm in trinitramide versus 0.110 nm in nitrogen;
trinitramide has single (N–N) bond and nitrogen (gas) has triple bond;
h. 106° – 108°;
(negative) charge centres/electron pairs/electron domains will be tetrahedrally arranged/orientated/ have tetrahedral geometry;
i. polar;
net dipole moment present in molecule / unsymmetrical distribution of charge / polar bonds do not cancel out / centre of negatively charged
oxygen atoms does not coincide with positively charged nitrogen atom;
Marks may also be awarded for a suitably presented diagram showing net dipole moment.
Examiners report
a. Most students could insert the coefficients to balance the equation provided and many recognized the benign nature of the products formed.
Though the structure of trinitramide was not given this did not seem to hinder students in calculating the required enthalpy change. A worryingly
high number of students however used bond enthalpies to calculate the enthalpy change in the part (a) equation rather than the much simpler
decomposition asked for, so to allow them to gain some credit, the mark scheme was adjusted. The sections relating to entropy and free energy
changes were generally well tackled, as was the comparative lengths of the N-N bonds. Predicting the shape and polarity of the trinitramide
molecule often proved more difficult, especially explaining the polarity of the molecule. Explanations of the effect of external pressure on boiling
point, in terms of vapour pressure, and of the effect of temperature, in terms of kinetic theory, often lacked clarity.
c. Most students could insert the coefficients to balance the equation provided and many recognized the benign nature of the products formed.
Though the structure of trinitramide was not given this did not seem to hinder students in calculating the required enthalpy change. A worryingly
high number of students however used bond enthalpies to calculate the enthalpy change in the part (a) equation rather than the much simpler
decomposition asked for, so to allow them to gain some credit, the mark scheme was adjusted. The sections relating to entropy and free energy
changes were generally well tackled, as was the comparative lengths of the N-N bonds. Predicting the shape and polarity of the trinitramide
molecule often proved more difficult, especially explaining the polarity of the molecule. Explanations of the effect of external pressure on boiling
point, in terms of vapour pressure, and of the effect of temperature, in terms of kinetic theory, often lacked clarity.
d. Most students could insert the coefficients to balance the equation provided and many recognized the benign nature of the products formed.
Though the structure of trinitramide was not given this did not seem to hinder students in calculating the required enthalpy change. A worryingly
high number of students however used bond enthalpies to calculate the enthalpy change in the part (a) equation rather than the much simpler
decomposition asked for, so to allow them to gain some credit, the mark scheme was adjusted. The sections relating to entropy and free energy
changes were generally well tackled, as was the comparative lengths of the N-N bonds. Predicting the shape and polarity of the trinitramide
molecule often proved more difficult, especially explaining the polarity of the molecule. Explanations of the effect of external pressure on boiling
point, in terms of vapour pressure, and of the effect of temperature, in terms of kinetic theory, often lacked clarity.
e. Most students could insert the coefficients to balance the equation provided and many recognized the benign nature of the products formed.
Though the structure of trinitramide was not given this did not seem to hinder students in calculating the required enthalpy change. A worryingly
high number of students however used bond enthalpies to calculate the enthalpy change in the part (a) equation rather than the much simpler
decomposition asked for, so to allow them to gain some credit, the mark scheme was adjusted. The sections relating to entropy and free energy
changes were generally well tackled, as was the comparative lengths of the N-N bonds. Predicting the shape and polarity of the trinitramide
molecule often proved more difficult, especially explaining the polarity of the molecule. Explanations of the effect of external pressure on boiling
point, in terms of vapour pressure, and of the effect of temperature, in terms of kinetic theory, often lacked clarity.
f. Most students could insert the coefficients to balance the equation provided and many recognized the benign nature of the products formed.
Though the structure of trinitramide was not given this did not seem to hinder students in calculating the required enthalpy change. A worryingly
high number of students however used bond enthalpies to calculate the enthalpy change in the part (a) equation rather than the much simpler
decomposition asked for, so to allow them to gain some credit, the mark scheme was adjusted. The sections relating to entropy and free energy
changes were generally well tackled, as was the comparative lengths of the N-N bonds. Predicting the shape and polarity of the trinitramide
molecule often proved more difficult, especially explaining the polarity of the molecule. Explanations of the effect of external pressure on boiling
point, in terms of vapour pressure, and of the effect of temperature, in terms of kinetic theory, often lacked clarity.
g. Most students could insert the coefficients to balance the equation provided and many recognized the benign nature of the products formed.
Though the structure of trinitramide was not given this did not seem to hinder students in calculating the required enthalpy change. A worryingly
high number of students however used bond enthalpies to calculate the enthalpy change in the part (a) equation rather than the much simpler
decomposition asked for, so to allow them to gain some credit, the mark scheme was adjusted. The sections relating to entropy and free energy
changes were generally well tackled, as was the comparative lengths of the N-N bonds. Predicting the shape and polarity of the trinitramide
molecule often proved more difficult, especially explaining the polarity of the molecule. Explanations of the effect of external pressure on boiling
point, in terms of vapour pressure, and of the effect of temperature, in terms of kinetic theory, often lacked clarity.
h. Most students could insert the coefficients to balance the equation provided and many recognized the benign nature of the products formed.
Though the structure of trinitramide was not given this did not seem to hinder students in calculating the required enthalpy change. A worryingly
high number of students however used bond enthalpies to calculate the enthalpy change in the part (a) equation rather than the much simpler
decomposition asked for, so to allow them to gain some credit, the mark scheme was adjusted. The sections relating to entropy and free energy
changes were generally well tackled, as was the comparative lengths of the N-N bonds. Predicting the shape and polarity of the trinitramide
molecule often proved more difficult, especially explaining the polarity of the molecule. Explanations of the effect of external pressure on boiling
point, in terms of vapour pressure, and of the effect of temperature, in terms of kinetic theory, often lacked clarity.
i. Most students could insert the coefficients to balance the equation provided and many recognized the benign nature of the products formed.
Though the structure of trinitramide was not given this did not seem to hinder students in calculating the required enthalpy change. A worryingly
high number of students however used bond enthalpies to calculate the enthalpy change in the part (a) equation rather than the much simpler
decomposition asked for, so to allow them to gain some credit, the mark scheme was adjusted. The sections relating to entropy and free energy
changes were generally well tackled, as was the comparative lengths of the N-N bonds. Predicting the shape and polarity of the trinitramide
molecule often proved more difficult, especially explaining the polarity of the molecule. Explanations of the effect of external pressure on boiling
point, in terms of vapour pressure, and of the effect of temperature, in terms of kinetic theory, often lacked clarity.
e.i. Identify the type of bond present between and in and state another example of a compound with this type of bonding. [2]
e.ii.The table below shows initial rates of reaction for different concentrations of each reactant for this reaction at temperature, . [3]
Deduce the rate expression, the overall order of the reaction and determine the value of , the rate constant, with its units, using the data from
Experiment 4.
f.ii. The observed rate expression is . Assuming that the proposed mechanism is correct, comment on the relative speeds of [1]
g. The following two-step mechanism has been suggested for the reaction of with CO (g), where . [2]
The experimental rate expression is . Explain why this mechanism produces a rate expression consistent with the
experimentally observed one.
The reaction was carried out at different temperatures and a value of the rate constant, , was obtained for each temperature. A graph of
against is shown below.
Calculate the activation energy, , for the reaction using these data and Table 1 of the Data Booklet showing your working.
Markscheme
e.i. dative (covalent)/coordinate;
carbon monoxide/CO / hydronium (ion)/ / ammonium (ion)/ / aluminium chloride/ / any relevant transition metal complex (e.g.
);
Accept AlCl3.
e.ii. ;
second (order)/2°;
f.i. ;
Allow “since step 1 involves 2NO and step 2 involves H2 and as all 3 molecules are involved in rate expression, then two steps must have
approximately same rate” / OWTTE.
two molecules of involved in step 1 consistent with rate expression / rate of overall reaction must equal rate of step 1 which is
/ OWTTE;
h. ;
Allow kJ or J.
Allow answers for Ea in range 1.75 102 kJ mol–1 to 1.91 102 kJ mol–1.
Award [4] for correct final answer with some working shown.
Award [2 max] for correct final answer without any working shown.
Examiners report
e.i. (i) was usually well done.
e.ii.some did not answer the question which asked for the overall order of the reaction. Some candidates also got their units incorrect. A few G2
comments mentioned the fact that the data was quite complicated as there was no experiment with constant. It is true that the maths here
may appear more challenging than normal, but candidates should be able to handle this type of data and in fact a significant number of the better
g. Although most candidates stated that the rds was step 1, many struggled with the explanation.
h. Although this question has been asked on a number of recent papers, candidates really struggled with this graphical based format. All sorts of
mistakes were made, including gradients, units etc. Some did not even know how to approach the question.
Carboplatin used in the treatment of lung cancer has the following three-dimensional structure.
a. Identify the name of the functional group circled in the structure of carboplatin. [1]
b. State the type of bonding between platinum and nitrogen in carboplatin. [1]
c.i. Draw the shape of an s orbital and a px orbital. Label the x, y and z axes on each diagram. [2]
d. A number of ruthenium-based anti-cancer drugs have also been developed. State the full electron configuration of the ruthenium(II) ion, . [1]
Construct the orbital diagram (using the arrow-in-box notation) for iron, showing the electrons in the and energy levels only and
label each sub-level on the diagram.
Markscheme
a. ester;
c.i.
Do not accept if py and pz are also drawn as question asks for orbital not sub-level.
c.ii.16;
d. ;
e.
unable to draw a px orbital or drew all p orbitals, or did not label the axis
b. [N/A]
[N/A]
c.i.
c.ii.Very few gave 16 as the answer.
[N/A]
d.
[N/A]
e.
Graphite has a layered structure of carbon atoms. A section of the structure is shown below.
a. Identify the type of attraction represented by the dotted lines shown between the layers. [1]
b. Graphite is used as a lubricant. Discuss two other uses of graphite with reference to its layered structure. [4]
Markscheme
a. van der Waals’/vdW/London/dispersion (forces)/LDF / temporary/instantaneous/induced dipoles;
M2 must contain concept of separation of layers, so do not award mark for phrases like "layers can slide over each other" on their own.
OR
bonding within layer is strong / layers are extensive / layers are strong;
OR
OR
Examiners report
a. Less than half the candidates recognized van der Waals’ forces between the layers in graphite. Some candidates identified the type of attraction as
“electrostatic” and others as “intermolecular forces” which were too general and did not score the mark.
b. Well answered generally. Most candidates gave two uses (usually pencil lead and electrical conductor) and they were often able to explain the uses
A sample of magnesium contains three isotopes: magnesium-24, magnesium-25 and magnesium-26, with abundances of 77.44%, 10.00% and
12.56% respectively.
The graph below shows pressure and volume data collected for a sample of carbon dioxide gas at 330 K.
a. (i) Calculate the relative atomic mass of this sample of magnesium correct to two decimal places. [4]
(ii) Predict the relative atomic radii of the three magnesium isotopes, giving your reasons.
b. (i) Explain the increase in ionization energy values from the 3rd to the 8th electrons. [3]
(ii) Explain the sharp increase in ionization energy values between the 10th and 11th electrons.
c. (i) Magnesium reacts with oxygen to form an ionic compound, magnesium oxide. Describe how the ions are formed, and the structure and [4]
(ii) Carbon reacts with oxygen to form a covalent compound, carbon dioxide. Describe what is meant by a covalent bond.
(iii) State why magnesium and oxygen form an ionic compound while carbon and oxygen form a covalent compound.
d. (i) Predict the type of hybridization of the carbon and oxygen atoms in . [7]
(ii) Sketch the orbitals of an oxygen atom in on the energy level diagram provided, including the electrons that occupy each orbital.
(iii) Define the term electronegativity.
e. (i) Draw a best-fit curve for the data on the graph. [4]
(ii) Use the data point labelled X to determine the amount, in mol, of carbon dioxide gas in the sample.
f. (i) Most indicators are weak acids. Describe qualitatively how indicators work. [3]
(ii) Identify a suitable indicator for a titration between a weak acid and a strong base, using Table 16 of the Data Booklet.
Markscheme
a. (i) ;
24.35;
Do not award any marks for 24.31 without showing method (as the value can be copied from the Data Booklet).
isotopes only differ by number of neutrons/size of nucleus / radius determined by electron shells and number of protons / OWTTE;
b. (i) decreasing repulsion between electrons / radius decreases as electrons are removed;
(ii) 10th electron is in second energy level/shell while 11th electron is in first energy level/shell / 10th is removing electron from electronic
arrangement 2,1 while 11th ionization energy is removing electron from electronic arrangement 2;
11th electron removed is much closer to the nucleus / 11th electron removed from a (much) lower energy level/shell;
c. (i) magnesium (atom) gives two electrons to oxygen (atom) / oxygen (atom) takes two electrons from magnesium (atom) / magnesium (atom)
(ii) electrostatic attraction between a pair of electrons and (positively charged) nuclei;
Accept reference to a numerical value of difference in electronegativity such as above and below 1.80.
d. (i) C: sp hybridization;
O: hybridization;
(ii)
orbitals contain: two, two and one electron and p-orbital contains one electron;
(iii) ability of atom/nucleus to attract bonding/shared pair of electrons / attraction of nucleus for bonding/shared pair of electrons / OWTTE;
(iv) (same number of shells but) increase in nuclear charge/atomic number/number of protons increases electronegativity / O has more protons
than C;
decrease in radius along the period increases electronegativity / O has smaller radius than C;
Do not accept a curve that passes through all of the points or an answer that joins the points using lines.
(ii) and
For M3 apply ECF for correct computation of the equation the student has written, unless more than one mistake is made prior this point.
if added to acid, the equilibrium shifts to the left and the colour of HIn is seen / OWTTE;
if added to base/alkali, the equilibrium shifts to the right and the colour of is seen / OWTTE;
(ii) phenolphthalein;
Examiners report
a. (i) Most candidates were able to calculate the relative atomic mass to the correct number of decimal places.
(ii) Only strong candidates were able to predict the same radius for the isotopes and gave correct reasoning. However, the majority of candidates
predicted that a larger number of neutrons resulted is a smaller radius, reflecting a poor understanding of atomic structure.
b. (i) Very few candidates were able to explain the increase in successive ionization energies for electrons removed from the same sub-shell. Many
c. (i) Well answered by many candidates. A few candidates were confusing ionic with covalent bonding, and some referred to a linear MgO
(ii) Few candidates were able to describe the covalent bond precisely. Those who didn’t score usually didn’t make any reference to pairs of
electrons.
(iii) Many candidates obtained this mark with satisfactory arguments. It was disappointing to see the abundance of answers based on “is a metal
with a non-metal” or “both are non-metals”.
d. (i) A few candidates identified sp hybridization based on a linear structure. Only the strongest candidates were able to give the correct
(ii) This was the most challenging question on the paper. It was rare to see a correct answer. It seems candidates did not have a good
understanding of hybridization.
(iii) Less than half the candidates were able to define electronegativity precisely. Many candidates did not relate it to the pair of electrons in a
covalent bond, and simply talked about attracting electrons, which was not sufficient for the mark.
(iv) Many candidates gained the first mark by stating that oxygen has more protons than carbon. But very few candidates identified the second
factor, which is the smaller radius of oxygen.
e. (i) More than half of the candidates drew a smooth curve that was central to the data points. Errors included straight lines, curves joining all data
(ii) A very well answered question. Some candidates converted the units of p and V incorrectly and others did not read the scales of the graph
correctly.
f. (i) Many candidates could explain the behaviour of indicators, but there were also some poor answers that did not acknowledge the importance
a.iii.Describe the colour change observed when excess but-2-ene reacts with bromine to form compound A. [1]
b. (i) Outline two reasons why the polymerization of alkenes is of economic importance. [3]
c.i. Compound C, , can also be formed by reacting compound B, , with aqueous potassium hydroxide. This reaction [4]
proceeds by both and mechanisms. Explain the mechanism, using curly arrows to represent the movement of electron pairs.
c.ii.Explain why the hydroxide ion is a better nucleophile than water. [2]
(ii) Deduce the structural formula of an alcohol which is a structural isomer of compound C and cannot be oxidized by acidified potassium
dichromate(VI).
h.iii.Draw the structures of the two geometrical isomers of but-2-ene, clearly identifying each as cis or trans. [2]
Markscheme
a.i.
;
a.ii.2,3-dibromobutane;
b. (i) (synthesis of) plastics/polymers/organic materials not naturally available / synthetic materials;
(ii) ;
Ignore n.
Brackets are not required for the mark, but continuation bonds are.
c.i.
Accept curly arrow either going from bond between C and Br to Br in 2-bromobutane or in the transition state.
representation of transition state showing negative charge, square brackets and partial bonds;
stronger attraction to the carbon atom with the partial positive charge / OWTTE;
e. (i) carbonyl;
Accept ketone.
(ii) ;
C has greater molar mass/more dispersion/London/instantaneous induced dipole-induced dipole forces/van der Waal forces;
g. ;
h.i. compounds with the same structural formula and different arrangement in space/3D structures;
carbon atoms of the C=C/carbon-carbon double bond (in alkene)/carbon atoms of the C–C/carbon-carbon single bond (in cycloalkane) must have
two different atoms/groups of atoms / OWTTE;
h.iii.
Award [1 max] if cis and trans isomers are correctly drawn and identified for alkene other than but-2-ene.
Award [1 max] if student draws and labels one structure correctly but not the other.
Examiners report
a.i. Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
a.ii.Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
a.iii.Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
b. Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
c.i. Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
c.ii.Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
e. Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
f. Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
g. Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
h.i. Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
h.ii.Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
h.iii.Most candidates were able to give the full structural formula but marks were lost by some as they gave the condensed formula rather than the full
structural formula as demanded by the question. Most were able to apply IUPAC rules and name A but some omitted the “di” from dibromobutane.
The colour change observed when but-2-ene reacts with bromine was well known, but knowledge of the economic importance of the
polymerisation of alkenes was limited with many candidates restricting their answers to identifying specific plastics such a polythene. Many
responses included incorrect references to nylon and margarine. Most candidates were able to identify the repeating unit of poly(but-2-ene). The
explanation of the mechanism was more successful than in previous sessions although a common error was a curly arrow originating from the
hydrogen atom in the hydroxide ion rather than the oxygen. Most candidates were able to explain the higher reactivity of the hydroxide ion
compared to the water molecule in terms of charge but only a minority referred to the attraction between the nucleophile and low electron density
of the carbon atom. The naming of 2-methylbutanenitrile was generally well done although small errors were accepted and the reagents needed for
the hydrogenation of 2-methylbutanenitrile were also generally known. A number of candidates omitted the branching methyl group in the amide
formed with ethanoic acid and confused aldehydes with ketone and only a small minority referred to the carbonyl group. Most candidates identified
only hydrogen bonds in compound C and did not refer to the dipole-dipole forces or van der Waals’ forces also present or explicitly compare the
relative strength of the different intermolecular forces in the two molecules. Some incorrectly referred to covalent bonding in their explanation. The
equation for the complete combustion of compound C was generally well known. The term stereoisomer was well understood but many
candidates did not refer to the restricted rotation around a double bond. Most candidates were able draw the structures of cis and trans but-2-ene.
Phosphoryl chloride, , is a dehydrating agent.
POCl3 can be prepared by the reaction of phosphorus pentachloride, PCl5 , with tetraphosphorus decaoxide, P4O10.
PCl3 and Cl– can act as ligands in transition metal complexes such as Ni(PCl3)4 and [Cr(H2O)3Cl3].
a.i. Predict and explain the sign of the entropy change, , for this reaction. [1]
a.ii.Calculate the standard entropy change for the reaction, , in , using the data below. [1]
a.iv.Calculate the standard enthalpy change for the reaction, , in , using the data below. [1]
a.v.Determine the standard free energy change for the reaction, , in , at 298 K. [1]
b.i. Deduce the Lewis (electron dot) structure of POCl3 (with P as the central element) and PCl3 and predict the shape of each molecule, using the [4]
c.ii.Predict the shape of this molecule, using the valence shell electron pair repulsion theory (VSEPR). [1]
c.iv.PCl3Br2 has the same molecular shape as PCl5. Draw the three isomers of PCl3Br2 and deduce whether each isomer is polar or non-polar. [3]
a.ii. ;
a.iii.heat/enthalpy change/required/absorbed when 1 mol of a compound is formed from its elements in their standard states/at 100 kPa/105 Pa/1 bar;
Temperatures not required in definition, allow if quoted (for example, 298 K/ 25 °C – most common) but pressure value must be correct if stated.
a.iv. ;
a.v. ;
a.vi.
(°C);
Accept T = 2849(K) .
b.i.
b.ii.allow any bond angle in the range 100° to less than 109° (experimental value is100°);
due to four negative charge centres/four electron pairs/four electron domains (one of which is a lone pair)/tetrahedral arrangement of electron
pairs/domains;
extra repulsion due to lone pair electrons / lone pairs occupy more space (than bonding pairs) so Cl–P–Cl bond angle decreases from 109.5° /
OWTTE;
c.i.
;
c.ii.trigonal/triangular bipyramidal;
Do not allow ECF from Lewis structures with incorrect number of negative charge centres.
c.iii.120° and 90°/180°;
c.iv.
which bonds to metal ion (in complex) / which forms dative (covalent)/coordinate bond to metal ion (in complex);
frequencies of (visible) light absorbed by electrons moving from lower to higher d levels;
Examiners report
a.i. Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
a.ii.Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
a.iii.Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
a.iv.Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
a.v.Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
a.vi.Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
b.i. Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
b.ii.Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
c.i. Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
c.ii.Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
c.iii.Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
c.iv.Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
d.i. Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
d.ii.Most candidates were able to calculate the entropy, enthalpy and free energy changes but made mistakes with the correct definition of enthalpy of
formation’. Many referred to the gaseous state which suggests some confusion with bond enthalpies. Many were comfortable with writing Lewis
structures and shapes of molecules, or some give incomplete explanations, not referring to the number of electron domains for example. Not many
students could write a balanced equation for the reaction between PCl3 and H2O (A.S. 13.1.2 of the guide). In part (d) even though many knew that
a ligand has a lone pair of electrons, they missed the second mark for ‘bonding to metal ion’.
a.i. State and explain the electrical conductivities of these two chloride compounds in their liquid state. [3]
a.ii.Suggest, giving your reasons, the approximate pH values of the solutions formed by adding each chloride compound separately to distilled [4]
water.
b.i. Identify the acid-base character of the oxides of each of the elements from sodium to chlorine in period 3. [2]
b.ii.State the equations for the separate reactions of sodium oxide and phosphorus(V) oxide with water. [2]
c.i. Deduce the Lewis (electron dot) structure of both molecules. [2]
c.ii.Predict the shapes of the two molecules, giving the Br–P–Br bond angle in and the F–S–F bond angles in . [4]
c.iii.Explain why both and are polar. [2]
d.i. Describe the covalent bond between carbon and hydrogen in the molecule above and how it is formed. [2]
bond:
bond:
d.iv.Identify the number of sigma and pi bonds present in a molecule of cis-but-2-ene-1,4-dioic acid. [1]
Markscheme
a.i. conducts electricity and does not;
Award [1 max] if all three points correct for one substance but not other.
a.ii. :
high charge density/high charge and small size of makes hydrolyse / polarizes water to produce ;
Do not accept .
Si to Cl (oxides): acidic
Award [1] for stating oxides become more acidic towards right/Cl or more basic towards left/Na.
b.ii. ;
Accept .
c.i.
c.ii.
c.iii.P–Br and S–F bonds are polar / bonds in both molecules are polar;
non-symmetrical distribution of electron cloud / polar bonds/dipoles do not cancel because of non-symmetrical shape;
M2 may also be scored with a suitable diagram showing the vectorial addition of the individual S–F dipole moments to show a net dipole moment
centred along the axis between the –S– bond.
d.i. EITHER
formed as a result of electron sharing (between the carbon and hydrogen nuclei);
OR
sigma bond formed by overlap of atomic orbitals;
d.ii. : and : ;
d.iii. bond:
bond:
d.iv.11 and 3 ;
Examiners report
a.i. Most candidates knew about the relative conductivities of magnesium chloride and phosphorous trichloride and were able to relate it to bonding.
The third mark was however more problematic as many continue to equate conductivity to mobile electrons rather than ions. The pH of solutions of
aqueous chlorides was not generally well known with only a small number of candidates gaining full marks. An explanation of the acidity of
magnesium in terms of the charge density of the ion proved to be particularly challenging. One teacher commented that the reaction of
and water is not mentioned in the guide but it is included in the teacher note to Assessment statement 13.1.1 of the current guide (although it
is not in the new guide which will be assessed for the first time in May 2016). The acidity of the period 3 oxides was generally well known but many
struggled to give balanced equations to describe the reactions of sodium and phosphorous(V) oxide with water, with many confusing the reaction
of sodium oxide with that of sodium giving hydrogen as a product. Most candidates were able to give correct Lewis structure and shapes and
bond angles but marks were lost, as in previous session due to missing lone pairs either on the central atoms or the Br and F atoms. It should be
noted that it is difficult to award ECF marks in these questions so students need to avoid careless errors. Many struggled to give a complete
explanation of the polarity of the two compounds as although the molecule was identified as being asymmetrical, few stated that the P–Br and S–F
bonds are polar. Only a minority of students stated that a covalent bond was an attraction between nuclei and a pair of electrons and many were
unable to identify the s-orbital from hydrogen and the orbital from carbon as the overlapping orbitals in the covalent bond. The hybridisation
a.ii.Most candidates knew about the relative conductivities of magnesium chloride and phosphorous trichloride and were able to relate it to bonding.
The third mark was however more problematic as many continue to equate conductivity to mobile electrons rather than ions. The pH of solutions of
aqueous chlorides was not generally well known with only a small number of candidates gaining full marks. An explanation of the acidity of
magnesium in terms of the charge density of the ion proved to be particularly challenging. One teacher commented that the reaction of
and water is not mentioned in the guide but it is included in the teacher note to Assessment statement 13.1.1 of the current guide (although it
is not in the new guide which will be assessed for the first time in May 2016). The acidity of the period 3 oxides was generally well known but many
struggled to give balanced equations to describe the reactions of sodium and phosphorous(V) oxide with water, with many confusing the reaction
of sodium oxide with that of sodium giving hydrogen as a product. Most candidates were able to give correct Lewis structure and shapes and
bond angles but marks were lost, as in previous session due to missing lone pairs either on the central atoms or the Br and F atoms. It should be
noted that it is difficult to award ECF marks in these questions so students need to avoid careless errors. Many struggled to give a complete
explanation of the polarity of the two compounds as although the molecule was identified as being asymmetrical, few stated that the P–Br and S–F
bonds are polar. Only a minority of students stated that a covalent bond was an attraction between nuclei and a pair of electrons and many were
unable to identify the s-orbital from hydrogen and the orbital from carbon as the overlapping orbitals in the covalent bond. The hybridisation
b.i. Most candidates knew about the relative conductivities of magnesium chloride and phosphorous trichloride and were able to relate it to bonding.
The third mark was however more problematic as many continue to equate conductivity to mobile electrons rather than ions. The pH of solutions of
aqueous chlorides was not generally well known with only a small number of candidates gaining full marks. An explanation of the acidity of
magnesium in terms of the charge density of the ion proved to be particularly challenging. One teacher commented that the reaction of
and water is not mentioned in the guide but it is included in the teacher note to Assessment statement 13.1.1 of the current guide (although it
is not in the new guide which will be assessed for the first time in May 2016). The acidity of the period 3 oxides was generally well known but many
struggled to give balanced equations to describe the reactions of sodium and phosphorous(V) oxide with water, with many confusing the reaction
of sodium oxide with that of sodium giving hydrogen as a product. Most candidates were able to give correct Lewis structure and shapes and
bond angles but marks were lost, as in previous session due to missing lone pairs either on the central atoms or the Br and F atoms. It should be
noted that it is difficult to award ECF marks in these questions so students need to avoid careless errors. Many struggled to give a complete
explanation of the polarity of the two compounds as although the molecule was identified as being asymmetrical, few stated that the P–Br and S–F
bonds are polar. Only a minority of students stated that a covalent bond was an attraction between nuclei and a pair of electrons and many were
unable to identify the s-orbital from hydrogen and the orbital from carbon as the overlapping orbitals in the covalent bond. The hybridisation
b.ii.Most candidates knew about the relative conductivities of magnesium chloride and phosphorous trichloride and were able to relate it to bonding.
The third mark was however more problematic as many continue to equate conductivity to mobile electrons rather than ions. The pH of solutions of
aqueous chlorides was not generally well known with only a small number of candidates gaining full marks. An explanation of the acidity of
magnesium in terms of the charge density of the ion proved to be particularly challenging. One teacher commented that the reaction of
and water is not mentioned in the guide but it is included in the teacher note to Assessment statement 13.1.1 of the current guide (although it
is not in the new guide which will be assessed for the first time in May 2016). The acidity of the period 3 oxides was generally well known but many
struggled to give balanced equations to describe the reactions of sodium and phosphorous(V) oxide with water, with many confusing the reaction
of sodium oxide with that of sodium giving hydrogen as a product. Most candidates were able to give correct Lewis structure and shapes and
bond angles but marks were lost, as in previous session due to missing lone pairs either on the central atoms or the Br and F atoms. It should be
noted that it is difficult to award ECF marks in these questions so students need to avoid careless errors. Many struggled to give a complete
explanation of the polarity of the two compounds as although the molecule was identified as being asymmetrical, few stated that the P–Br and S–F
bonds are polar. Only a minority of students stated that a covalent bond was an attraction between nuclei and a pair of electrons and many were
unable to identify the s-orbital from hydrogen and the orbital from carbon as the overlapping orbitals in the covalent bond. The hybridisation
The third mark was however more problematic as many continue to equate conductivity to mobile electrons rather than ions. The pH of solutions of
aqueous chlorides was not generally well known with only a small number of candidates gaining full marks. An explanation of the acidity of
magnesium in terms of the charge density of the ion proved to be particularly challenging. One teacher commented that the reaction of
and water is not mentioned in the guide but it is included in the teacher note to Assessment statement 13.1.1 of the current guide (although it
is not in the new guide which will be assessed for the first time in May 2016). The acidity of the period 3 oxides was generally well known but many
struggled to give balanced equations to describe the reactions of sodium and phosphorous(V) oxide with water, with many confusing the reaction
of sodium oxide with that of sodium giving hydrogen as a product. Most candidates were able to give correct Lewis structure and shapes and
bond angles but marks were lost, as in previous session due to missing lone pairs either on the central atoms or the Br and F atoms. It should be
noted that it is difficult to award ECF marks in these questions so students need to avoid careless errors. Many struggled to give a complete
explanation of the polarity of the two compounds as although the molecule was identified as being asymmetrical, few stated that the P–Br and S–F
bonds are polar. Only a minority of students stated that a covalent bond was an attraction between nuclei and a pair of electrons and many were
unable to identify the s-orbital from hydrogen and the orbital from carbon as the overlapping orbitals in the covalent bond. The hybridisation
c.ii.Most candidates knew about the relative conductivities of magnesium chloride and phosphorous trichloride and were able to relate it to bonding.
The third mark was however more problematic as many continue to equate conductivity to mobile electrons rather than ions. The pH of solutions of
aqueous chlorides was not generally well known with only a small number of candidates gaining full marks. An explanation of the acidity of
magnesium in terms of the charge density of the ion proved to be particularly challenging. One teacher commented that the reaction of
and water is not mentioned in the guide but it is included in the teacher note to Assessment statement 13.1.1 of the current guide (although it
is not in the new guide which will be assessed for the first time in May 2016). The acidity of the period 3 oxides was generally well known but many
struggled to give balanced equations to describe the reactions of sodium and phosphorous(V) oxide with water, with many confusing the reaction
of sodium oxide with that of sodium giving hydrogen as a product. Most candidates were able to give correct Lewis structure and shapes and
bond angles but marks were lost, as in previous session due to missing lone pairs either on the central atoms or the Br and F atoms. It should be
noted that it is difficult to award ECF marks in these questions so students need to avoid careless errors. Many struggled to give a complete
explanation of the polarity of the two compounds as although the molecule was identified as being asymmetrical, few stated that the P–Br and S–F
bonds are polar. Only a minority of students stated that a covalent bond was an attraction between nuclei and a pair of electrons and many were
unable to identify the s-orbital from hydrogen and the orbital from carbon as the overlapping orbitals in the covalent bond. The hybridisation
c.iii.Most candidates knew about the relative conductivities of magnesium chloride and phosphorous trichloride and were able to relate it to bonding.
The third mark was however more problematic as many continue to equate conductivity to mobile electrons rather than ions. The pH of solutions of
aqueous chlorides was not generally well known with only a small number of candidates gaining full marks. An explanation of the acidity of
magnesium in terms of the charge density of the ion proved to be particularly challenging. One teacher commented that the reaction of
and water is not mentioned in the guide but it is included in the teacher note to Assessment statement 13.1.1 of the current guide (although it
is not in the new guide which will be assessed for the first time in May 2016). The acidity of the period 3 oxides was generally well known but many
struggled to give balanced equations to describe the reactions of sodium and phosphorous(V) oxide with water, with many confusing the reaction
of sodium oxide with that of sodium giving hydrogen as a product. Most candidates were able to give correct Lewis structure and shapes and
bond angles but marks were lost, as in previous session due to missing lone pairs either on the central atoms or the Br and F atoms. It should be
noted that it is difficult to award ECF marks in these questions so students need to avoid careless errors. Many struggled to give a complete
explanation of the polarity of the two compounds as although the molecule was identified as being asymmetrical, few stated that the P–Br and S–F
bonds are polar. Only a minority of students stated that a covalent bond was an attraction between nuclei and a pair of electrons and many were
unable to identify the s-orbital from hydrogen and the orbital from carbon as the overlapping orbitals in the covalent bond. The hybridisation
d.i. Most candidates knew about the relative conductivities of magnesium chloride and phosphorous trichloride and were able to relate it to bonding.
The third mark was however more problematic as many continue to equate conductivity to mobile electrons rather than ions. The pH of solutions of
aqueous chlorides was not generally well known with only a small number of candidates gaining full marks. An explanation of the acidity of
magnesium in terms of the charge density of the ion proved to be particularly challenging. One teacher commented that the reaction of
and water is not mentioned in the guide but it is included in the teacher note to Assessment statement 13.1.1 of the current guide (although it
is not in the new guide which will be assessed for the first time in May 2016). The acidity of the period 3 oxides was generally well known but many
struggled to give balanced equations to describe the reactions of sodium and phosphorous(V) oxide with water, with many confusing the reaction
of sodium oxide with that of sodium giving hydrogen as a product. Most candidates were able to give correct Lewis structure and shapes and
bond angles but marks were lost, as in previous session due to missing lone pairs either on the central atoms or the Br and F atoms. It should be
noted that it is difficult to award ECF marks in these questions so students need to avoid careless errors. Many struggled to give a complete
explanation of the polarity of the two compounds as although the molecule was identified as being asymmetrical, few stated that the P–Br and S–F
bonds are polar. Only a minority of students stated that a covalent bond was an attraction between nuclei and a pair of electrons and many were
unable to identify the s-orbital from hydrogen and the orbital from carbon as the overlapping orbitals in the covalent bond. The hybridisation
d.ii.Most candidates knew about the relative conductivities of magnesium chloride and phosphorous trichloride and were able to relate it to bonding.
The third mark was however more problematic as many continue to equate conductivity to mobile electrons rather than ions. The pH of solutions of
aqueous chlorides was not generally well known with only a small number of candidates gaining full marks. An explanation of the acidity of
magnesium in terms of the charge density of the ion proved to be particularly challenging. One teacher commented that the reaction of
and water is not mentioned in the guide but it is included in the teacher note to Assessment statement 13.1.1 of the current guide (although it
is not in the new guide which will be assessed for the first time in May 2016). The acidity of the period 3 oxides was generally well known but many
struggled to give balanced equations to describe the reactions of sodium and phosphorous(V) oxide with water, with many confusing the reaction
of sodium oxide with that of sodium giving hydrogen as a product. Most candidates were able to give correct Lewis structure and shapes and
bond angles but marks were lost, as in previous session due to missing lone pairs either on the central atoms or the Br and F atoms. It should be
noted that it is difficult to award ECF marks in these questions so students need to avoid careless errors. Many struggled to give a complete
explanation of the polarity of the two compounds as although the molecule was identified as being asymmetrical, few stated that the P–Br and S–F
bonds are polar. Only a minority of students stated that a covalent bond was an attraction between nuclei and a pair of electrons and many were
unable to identify the s-orbital from hydrogen and the orbital from carbon as the overlapping orbitals in the covalent bond. The hybridisation
d.iii.Most candidates knew about the relative conductivities of magnesium chloride and phosphorous trichloride and were able to relate it to bonding.
The third mark was however more problematic as many continue to equate conductivity to mobile electrons rather than ions. The pH of solutions of
aqueous chlorides was not generally well known with only a small number of candidates gaining full marks. An explanation of the acidity of
magnesium in terms of the charge density of the ion proved to be particularly challenging. One teacher commented that the reaction of
and water is not mentioned in the guide but it is included in the teacher note to Assessment statement 13.1.1 of the current guide (although it
is not in the new guide which will be assessed for the first time in May 2016). The acidity of the period 3 oxides was generally well known but many
struggled to give balanced equations to describe the reactions of sodium and phosphorous(V) oxide with water, with many confusing the reaction
of sodium oxide with that of sodium giving hydrogen as a product. Most candidates were able to give correct Lewis structure and shapes and
bond angles but marks were lost, as in previous session due to missing lone pairs either on the central atoms or the Br and F atoms. It should be
noted that it is difficult to award ECF marks in these questions so students need to avoid careless errors. Many struggled to give a complete
explanation of the polarity of the two compounds as although the molecule was identified as being asymmetrical, few stated that the P–Br and S–F
bonds are polar. Only a minority of students stated that a covalent bond was an attraction between nuclei and a pair of electrons and many were
unable to identify the s-orbital from hydrogen and the orbital from carbon as the overlapping orbitals in the covalent bond. The hybridisation
d.iv.Most candidates knew about the relative conductivities of magnesium chloride and phosphorous trichloride and were able to relate it to bonding.
The third mark was however more problematic as many continue to equate conductivity to mobile electrons rather than ions. The pH of solutions of
aqueous chlorides was not generally well known with only a small number of candidates gaining full marks. An explanation of the acidity of
magnesium in terms of the charge density of the ion proved to be particularly challenging. One teacher commented that the reaction of
and water is not mentioned in the guide but it is included in the teacher note to Assessment statement 13.1.1 of the current guide (although it
is not in the new guide which will be assessed for the first time in May 2016). The acidity of the period 3 oxides was generally well known but many
struggled to give balanced equations to describe the reactions of sodium and phosphorous(V) oxide with water, with many confusing the reaction
of sodium oxide with that of sodium giving hydrogen as a product. Most candidates were able to give correct Lewis structure and shapes and
bond angles but marks were lost, as in previous session due to missing lone pairs either on the central atoms or the Br and F atoms. It should be
noted that it is difficult to award ECF marks in these questions so students need to avoid careless errors. Many struggled to give a complete
explanation of the polarity of the two compounds as although the molecule was identified as being asymmetrical, few stated that the P–Br and S–F
bonds are polar. Only a minority of students stated that a covalent bond was an attraction between nuclei and a pair of electrons and many were
unable to identify the s-orbital from hydrogen and the orbital from carbon as the overlapping orbitals in the covalent bond. The hybridisation
The hydrogen halides do not show perfect periodicity. A bar chart of boiling points shows that the boiling point of hydrogen fluoride, HF, is much
a. (i) State the changes in the acid-base nature of the oxides across period 3 (from to ), including equations for the reactions of [7]
(ii) State whether or not molten aluminium chloride, , and molten aluminium oxide, , conduct electricity. Explain this behaviour in
terms of the structure and bonding of the two compounds.
b. (i) Predict any changes that may be observed in each case. [4]
:
c. (i) Explain why the boiling point of HF is much higher than the boiling points of the other hydrogen halides. [3]
(ii) Explain the trend in the boiling points of HCl, HBr and HI.
Cr:
d.ii. ions and water molecules bond together to form the complex ion . [3]
Describe how the water acts and how it forms the bond, identifying the acid-base character of the reaction.
d.iv.Outline, including a relevant equation, whether the ion is acidic, basic or neutral. [1]
e. Explain how the number of electrons in the outer main energy level of phosphorus, P, can be determined using the data of successive ionization [2]
energies.
Markscheme
a. (i) basic to acidic;
(iii) ;
Allow .
b. (i) : no change;
(ii) ;
d.i. Cr: ;
Cr3+: ;
d orbitals split into two levels / three lower energy and two higher energy levels;
electron transitions occur from lower to higher energy level within d sub-level;
d.iv.acidic because ;
Examiners report
a. There appeared to be some significant gaps in knowledge within this question, the various parts either scored very well or not at all.
In a(ii) there was a poor understanding of the nature of bonding in aluminium chloride and aluminium oxide. Candidates are still confusing electrical
conductivity in compounds with that in metals, and often refer to the inability to conduct being down to a lack of mobile electrons in compounds.
Balancing equations, both full, as in parts a(i) and a(iii), and half equations as in b(ii), showed poor knowledge both of the reactants and products
and in the ability to balance them in both atoms and charge. It should be expected that higher level candidates would be comfortable with these
processes. The ability to deduce and predict what they would see during a reaction is a skill required of all chemists, it was missing in the attempts
to answer b(ii). Parts c and d(i), (ii) and (iii) showed good knowledge, but in part d(iv) the understanding of the acid nature of some d block complex
ions was lacking. Part e was rarely given credit, as many appeared to misread the question, and discussed the changes in first ionisation energies
across Period 3.
b. There appeared to be some significant gaps in knowledge within this question, the various parts either scored very well or not at all.
In a(ii) there was a poor understanding of the nature of bonding in aluminium chloride and aluminium oxide. Candidates are still confusing electrical
conductivity in compounds with that in metals, and often refer to the inability to conduct being down to a lack of mobile electrons in compounds.
Balancing equation,s both full, as in parts a(i) and a(iii), and half equations as in b(ii), showed poor knowledge both of the reactants and products
and in the ability to balance them in both atoms and charge. It should be expected that higher level candidates would be comfortable with these
processes. The ability to deduce and predict what they would see during a reaction is a skill required of all chemists, it was missing in the attempts
to answer b(ii). Parts c and d(i), ii) and iii) showed good knowledge, but in part d(iv) the understanding of the acid nature of some d block complex
ions was lacking. Part e was rarely given credit, as many appeared to misread the question, and discussed the changes in first ionisation energies
across Period 3.
c. There appeared to be some significant gaps in knowledge within this question, the various parts either scored very well or not at all.
In a(ii) there was a poor understanding of the nature of bonding in aluminium chloride and aluminium oxide. Candidates are still confusing electrical
conductivity in compounds with that in metals, and often refer to the inability to conduct being down to a lack of mobile electrons in compounds.
Balancing equations, both full, as in parts a(i) and a(iii), and half equations as in b(ii), showed poor knowledge both of the reactants and products
and in the ability to balance them in both atoms and charge. It should be expected that higher level candidates would be comfortable with these
processes. The ability to deduce and predict what they would see during a reaction is a skill required of all chemists, it was missing in the attempts
to answer b(ii). Parts c and d(i), ii) and iii) showed good knowledge, but in part d(iv) the understanding of the acid nature of some d block complex
ions was lacking. Part e was rarely given credit, as many appeared to misread the question, and discussed the changes in first ionisation energies
across Period 3.
d.i. There appeared to be some significant gaps in knowledge within this question, the various parts either scored very well or not at all.
In a(ii) there was a poor understanding of the nature of bonding in aluminium chloride and aluminium oxide. Candidates are still confusing electrical
conductivity in compounds with that in metals, and often refer to the inability to conduct being down to a lack of mobile electrons in compounds.
Balancing equations, both full, as in parts a(i) and a(iii), and half equations as in b(ii), showed poor knowledge both of the reactants and products
and in the ability to balance them in both atoms and charge. It should be expected that higher level candidates would be comfortable with these
processes. The ability to deduce and predict what they would see during a reaction is a skill required of all chemists, it was missing in the attempts
to answer b(ii). Parts c and d(i), ii) and iii) showed good knowledge, but in part d(iv) the understanding of the acid nature of some d block complex
ions was lacking. Part e was rarely given credit, as many appeared to misread the question, and discussed the changes in first ionisation energies
across Period 3.
d.ii.There appeared to be some significant gaps in knowledge within this question, the various parts either scored very well or not at all.
In a(ii) there was a poor understanding of the nature of bonding in aluminium chloride and aluminium oxide. Candidates are still confusing electrical
conductivity in compounds with that in metals, and often refer to the inability to conduct being down to a lack of mobile electrons in compounds.
Balancing equations, both full, as in parts a(i) and a(iii), and half equations as in b(ii), showed poor knowledge both of the reactants and products
and in the ability to balance them in both atoms and charge. It should be expected that higher level candidates would be comfortable with these
processes. The ability to deduce and predict what they would see during a reaction is a skill required of all chemists, it was missing in the attempts
to answer b(ii). Parts c and d(i), ii) and iii) showed good knowledge, but in part d(iv) the understanding of the acid nature of some d block complex
ions was lacking. Part e was rarely given credit, as many appeared to misread the question, and discussed the changes in first ionisation energies
across Period 3.
d.iii.There appeared to be some significant gaps in knowledge within this question, the various parts either scored very well or not at all.
In a(ii) there was a poor understanding of the nature of bonding in aluminium chloride and aluminium oxide. Candidates are still confusing electrical
conductivity in compounds with that in metals, and often refer to the inability to conduct being down to a lack of mobile electrons in compounds.
Balancing equations, both full, as in parts a(i) and a(iii), and half equations as in b(ii), showed poor knowledge both of the reactants and products
and in the ability to balance them in both atoms and charge. It should be expected that higher level candidates would be comfortable with these
processes. The ability to deduce and predict what they would see during a reaction is a skill required of all chemists, it was missing in the attempts
to answer b(ii). Parts c and d(i), ii) and iii) showed good knowledge, but in part d(iv) the understanding of the acid nature of some d block complex
ions was lacking. Part e was rarely given credit, as many appeared to misread the question, and discussed the changes in first ionisation energies
across Period 3.
d.iv.There appeared to be some significant gaps in knowledge within this question, the various parts either scored very well or not at all.
In a(ii) there was a poor understanding of the nature of bonding in aluminium chloride and aluminium oxide. Candidates are still confusing electrical
conductivity in compounds with that in metals, and often refer to the inability to conduct being down to a lack of mobile electrons in compounds.
Balancing equations, both full, as in parts a(i) and a(iii), and half equations as in b(ii), showed poor knowledge both of the reactants and products
and in the ability to balance them in both atoms and charge. It should be expected that higher level candidates would be comfortable with these
processes. The ability to deduce and predict what they would see during a reaction is a skill required of all chemists, it was missing in the attempts
to answer b(ii). Parts c and d(i), ii) and iii) showed good knowledge, but in part d(iv) the understanding of the acid nature of some d block complex
ions was lacking. Part e was rarely given credit, as many appeared to misread the question, and discussed the changes in first ionisation energies
across Period 3.
e. There appeared to be some significant gaps in knowledge within this question, the various parts either scored very well or not at all.
In a(ii) there was a poor understanding of the nature of bonding in aluminium chloride and aluminium oxide. Candidates are still confusing electrical
conductivity in compounds with that in metals, and often refer to the inability to conduct being down to a lack of mobile electrons in compounds.
Balancing equations, both full, as in parts a(i) and a(iii), and half equations as in b(ii) showed poor knowledge both of the reactants and products
and in the ability to balance them in both atoms and charge. It should be expected that higher level candidates would be comfortable with these
processes. The ability to deduce and predict what they would see during a reaction is a skill required of all chemists, it was missing in the attempts
to answer b(ii). Parts c and d(i), ii) and iii) showed good knowledge, but in part d(iv) the understanding of the acid nature of some d block complex
ions was lacking. Part e was rarely given credit, as many appeared to misread the question, and discussed the changes in first ionisation energies
across Period 3.
a. State the equations for the reactions of sodium oxide with water and phosphorus(V) oxide with water. [2]
b.i. Explain why the melting point of phosphorus(V) oxide is lower than that of sodium oxide in terms of their bonding and structure. [2]
b.ii.Predict whether phosphorus(V) oxide and sodium oxide conduct electricity in their solid and molten states. Complete the boxes with “yes” or [2]
“no”.
c. Predict and explain the pH of the following aqueous solutions, using equations to support your answer. [4]
Ammonium chloride, :
Sodium methanoate, :
Markscheme
a.
Accept .
Accept .
Accept .
in giant/3D/network/lattice structure with strong (ionic) bonds and has a (simple) molecular structure/weak intermolecular forces
(between molecules);
Award [1] for stating that bonds require more energy to break in than in .
b.ii.
;
c. Ammonium chloride:
Sodium methanoate:
Award [1 max] for both M1 and M3 combined if stated “pH < 7/acidic for ammonium chloride and pH > 7/alkaline/basic for sodium methanoate”.
Award [1 max] for two correct explanations, such as “salt of weak acid and strong base” or “salt of weak base and strong acid”, without equations.
Examiners report
a. In (a) sodium oxide was answered better than phosphorus(V) oxide (a direct reference to Assessment Statement 13.1.1) although there were many
instances of NaO. In (b) there were the usual suggestions that covalent bonds are weaker than ionic bonds. Candidates find the distinction
between inter- and intra-molecular bonding very difficult to grasp. Some didn’t realize that is ionic. Answers about electrical conductivity
usually gained one of the two marks available so there may have been an element of guesswork here. Many answers to (c) gained only one mark
for knowing that one would be acidic and the other basic. There was very poor understanding of the equations needed and the explanation of the
equilibria involved.
b.i. In (a) sodium oxide was answered better than phosphorus(V) oxide (a direct reference to Assessment Statement 13.1.1) although there were many
instances of NaO. In (b) there were the usual suggestions that covalent bonds are weaker than ionic bonds. Candidates find the distinction
between inter- and intra-molecular bonding very difficult to grasp. Some didn’t realize that is ionic. Answers about electrical conductivity
usually gained one of the two marks available so there may have been an element of guesswork here. Many answers to (c) gained only one mark
for knowing that one would be acidic and the other basic. There was very poor understanding of the equations needed and the explanation of the
equilibria involved.
b.ii.In (a) sodium oxide was answered better than phosphorus(V) oxide (a direct reference to Assessment Statement 13.1.1) although there were many
instances of NaO. In (b) there were the usual suggestions that covalent bonds are weaker than ionic bonds. Candidates find the distinction
between inter- and intra-molecular bonding very difficult to grasp. Some didn’t realize that is ionic. Answers about electrical conductivity
usually gained one of the two marks available so there may have been an element of guesswork here. Many answers to (c) gained only one mark
for knowing that one would be acidic and the other basic. There was very poor understanding of the equations needed and the explanation of the
equilibria involved.
c. In (a) sodium oxide was answered better than phosphorus(V) oxide (a direct reference to Assessment Statement 13.1.1) although there were many
instances of NaO. In (b) there were the usual suggestions that covalent bonds are weaker than ionic bonds. Candidates find the distinction
between inter- and intra-molecular bonding very difficult to grasp. Some didn’t realize that is ionic. Answers about electrical conductivity
usually gained one of the two marks available so there may have been an element of guesswork here. Many answers to (c) gained only one mark
for knowing that one would be acidic and the other basic. There was very poor understanding of the equations needed and the explanation of the
equilibria involved.
b.i. State and explain the difference in the electrical conductivity in the liquid state of the two chlorides. [3]
Markscheme
b.i. conducts and does not;
Award [1 max] for PCl5 does not conduct and covalent/molecular/(consists of molecules).
Allow [1 max] for stating that PBr3 is polar and SF6 is non-polar without giving a reason or if explanations are incorrect.
Allow polar bonds do not cancel for PBr3 and polar bonds cancel for SF6.
Do not allow asymmetric molecule as reason for PBr3 or symmetric molecule for SF6 as reason alone.
d.i. bond:
end-on/axial overlap with electron density between the two carbon atoms/nuclei / end-on/axial overlap of orbitals so shared electrons are between
atoms / OWTTE;
bond:
sideways/parallel overlap of p orbitals with electron density above and below internuclear axis/ bond / sideways/parallel overlap of p orbitals so
shared electrons are above and below internuclear axis/ bond / OWTTE;
Award [1 max] for stating end-on/axial overlap for and sideways/parallel overlap for only i.e. without mentioning electron density OR stating
electron density between the two atoms/nuclei for and above and below internuclear axis for .
Examiners report
b.i. This was usually well answered.
c. The Lewis structures were usually well drawn but some omitted the lone pairs. The shapes were also usually correct, though some stated that the
shape of is tetrahedral which is incorrect. The electron domain geometry of is tetrahedral as there are four negative charge centres or
four electron domains, but the molecular geometry and hence the shape is trigonal/triangular pyramidal. It is worth emphasising this difference
between electron domain geometry and molecular geometry in discussions of shape in VSEPR Theory. As regards the bond angles, a few forgot
the fact that the lone pair on the P occupies more space and hence the angle drops below 109.5 degrees. Many simply wrote 107 degrees, which
is the bond angle in ammonia. An important point to make here is that every trigonal pyramidal geometry does not have a bond angle equivalent to
that of ammonia, 107 degrees, which is a point often misunderstood by candidates. In fact, many factors can come into play here including lone
pairs and electronegativity considerations. In fact, the experimental bond angle for is 101 degrees and candidates would have scored the
mark if they gave any value in the range 100 to less than 109.5 degrees. Candidates are not required to know experimental values but should not
make sweeping conclusions that all trigonal pyramidal geometries have 107 degree bond angles, which certainly is not the case. For , 90 and
120 bond angles were often incorrectly given. The most disappointing part of this sub-section however was the poor explanations of polarity. Some
of the top candidates did however give complete explanations and referred to the polar PBr bonds and the fact that as the molecule is not
symmetrical there is an asymmetric distribution of the electron cloud. It was nice to see vectorial addition of bond dipoles supporting this type of
explanation resulting in a clearly defined and drawn net dipole moment in the case of leading to its polar nature and similar arguments and
d.i. Very few candidates scored both marks on sigma and pi bonds.
Bleaches in which chlorine is the active ingredient are the most common, although some environmental groups have concerns about their use.
In aqueous chlorine the equilibrium below produces chloric(I) acid (hypochlorous acid), HOCl, the active bleach.
Aqueous sodium chlorate(I), NaOCl, the most common active ingredient in chlorine based bleaches, oxidizes coloured materials to colourless
products while being reduced to the chloride ion. It will also oxidize sulfur dioxide to the sulfate ion.
The standard electrode potential for the reduction of the chlorate(V) ion to the chloride ion is .
a. (i) Describe the colour change that occurs when aqueous chlorine is added to aqueous sodium bromide. [3]
(ii) Outline, with the help of a chemical equation, why this reaction occurs.
b.i. Chloric(I) acid is a weak acid, but hydrochloric acid is a strong acid. Outline how this is indicated in the equation above. [1]
b.ii.State a balanced equation for the reaction of chloric(I) acid with water. [1]
b.iii.Outline, in terms of the equilibrium in aqueous chlorine, why it is dangerous to use an acidic toilet cleaner in combination with this kind of [2]
bleach.
b.iv.Suggest why a covalent molecule, such as chloric(I) acid, is readily soluble in water. [2]
b.v.Partial neutralization of chloric(I) acid creates a buffer solution. Given that the of chloric(I) acid is 7.53, determine the pH of a solution that [4]
has and .
b.vi.Describe, using HIn to represent the indicator in its acid form, why an indicator changes colour when excess alkali is added. [3]
c. (i) Deduce a balanced equation for the reaction between the chlorate(I) ion and sulfur dioxide from the appropriate half-equations. [6]
(ii) State the initial and final oxidation numbers of both chlorine and sulfur in the final equation.
(ii) Referring to Table 14 of the Data Booklet, deduce, giving a reason, whether the oxidation of the chromium(III) ion to the dichromate(VI) ion
by the chlorate(V) ion is energetically feasible.
Markscheme
a. (i) from (pale) green/colourless to yellow/orange/brown;
Accept “chloride ion a weaker reducing agent” / “bromide ion a stronger reducing agent”.
b.i. chloric(I) acid (shown as) a molecule/molecular, but hydrochloric acid (shown as being) split into ions / OWTTE;
Accept “chloric(I) acid is partially dissociated and hydrochloric acid is fully dissociated”.
Reference needed to both acids for mark.
b.ii. ;
b.iv.chloric(I) acid has –OH group / hydrogen attached to a very electronegative atom;
b.v. ;
b.vi. ;
(weak acid in which the) acid/HIn and conjugate base/In– have different colours / OWTTE;
excess alkali shifts the equilibrium to the RHS/towards the conjugate base;
c. (i) ;
Ignore state symbols and absence of equilibrium arrow for all equations and accept inclusion of Na+ in any equation.
Allow “solute concentration of 1 mol dm–3” or “1 bar/1 atm (pressure) for gases” instead of “standard conditions”.
would have a positive / chlorate(V) ion stronger oxidizing agent than dichromate(VI) ion / OWTTE;
Examiners report
a. Though it was the least popular question on the paper, it was still answered, though not very well, by a significant number of students. Correct
responses to the colour change required in the first part were rare, though more students could write an appropriate equation and outline why the
reaction occurred, even though this was often phrased in terms of electronegativity, rather than reactivity or electrode potential. In part (b) many
students seemed to be aware of the difference between strong and weak acids, but few could use this to answer the question asked and
frequently, even having displayed this knowledge, were unable to write an equation for the required reaction in water. Unfortunately changes in
pagination meant that the phrase “the equilibrium above” in part (b) (iii) may have confused candidates with regard to which particular equilibrium
the question referred to. Fortunately both of the equilibria that it could have referred to change in the same direction and students scored well on
this, and both would eventually result in the release of chlorine, that a number recognized as a toxic gas. In contrast to Question 1, many students
could correctly identify the hydrogen bonding, resulting from the –OH group, as being the reason for the solubility of HOCl in water. An encouraging
number of students gained full marks for calculating the pH of the buffer, usually by memorizing the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and
substituting in this. An even greater number of students could accurately explain the mode of action of acid-base indicators. In part (c) very few
students could write, much less combine, appropriate half equations, even though the reactants and products were given, but far more could
correctly deduce the oxidation numbers of the species involved. In the final part most students had some general idea of what a standard
electrode potential was, but in many cases the definitions lacked the detail required. Quite a few students correctly deduced that the oxidation of
chromium(III) to dichromate(VI) was energetically feasible and give valid reasons to support this.
b.i. Though it was the least popular question on the paper, it was still answered, though not very well, by a significant number of students. Correct
responses to the colour change required in the first part were rare, though more students could write an appropriate equation and outline why the
reaction occurred, even though this was often phrased in terms of electronegativity, rather than reactivity or electrode potential. In part (b) many
students seemed to be aware of the difference between strong and weak acids, but few could use this to answer the question asked and
frequently, even having displayed this knowledge, were unable to write an equation for the required reaction in water. Unfortunately changes in
pagination meant that the phrase “the equilibrium above” in part (b) (iii) may have confused candidates with regard to which particular equilibrium
the question referred to. Fortunately both of the equilibria that it could have referred to change in the same direction and students scored well on
this, and both would eventually result in the release of chlorine, that a number recognized as a toxic gas. In contrast to Question 1, many students
could correctly identify the hydrogen bonding, resulting from the –OH group, as being the reason for the solubility of HOCl in water. An encouraging
number of students gained full marks for calculating the pH of the buffer, usually by memorizing the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and
substituting in this. An even greater number of students could accurately explain the mode of action of acid-base indicators. In part (c) very few
students could write, much less combine, appropriate half equations, even though the reactants and products were given, but far more could
correctly deduce the oxidation numbers of the species involved. In the final part most students had some general idea of what a standard
electrode potential was, but in many cases the definitions lacked the detail required. Quite a few students correctly deduced that the oxidation of
chromium(III) to dichromate(VI) was energetically feasible and give valid reasons to support this.
b.ii.Though it was the least popular question on the paper, it was still answered, though not very well, by a significant number of students. Correct
responses to the colour change required in the first part were rare, though more students could write an appropriate equation and outline why the
reaction occurred, even though this was often phrased in terms of electronegativity, rather than reactivity or electrode potential. In part (b) many
students seemed to be aware of the difference between strong and weak acids, but few could use this to answer the question asked and
frequently, even having displayed this knowledge, were unable to write an equation for the required reaction in water. Unfortunately changes in
pagination meant that the phrase “the equilibrium above” in part (b) (iii) may have confused candidates with regard to which particular equilibrium
the question referred to. Fortunately both of the equilibria that it could have referred to change in the same direction and students scored well on
this, and both would eventually result in the release of chlorine, that a number recognized as a toxic gas. In contrast to Question 1, many students
could correctly identify the hydrogen bonding, resulting from the –OH group, as being the reason for the solubility of HOCl in water. An encouraging
number of students gained full marks for calculating the pH of the buffer, usually by memorizing the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and
substituting in this. An even greater number of students could accurately explain the mode of action of acid-base indicators. In part (c) very few
students could write, much less combine, appropriate half equations, even though the reactants and products were given, but far more could
correctly deduce the oxidation numbers of the species involved. In the final part most students had some general idea of what a standard
electrode potential was, but in many cases the definitions lacked the detail required. Quite a few students correctly deduced that the oxidation of
chromium(III) to dichromate(VI) was energetically feasible and give valid reasons to support this.
b.iii.Though it was the least popular question on the paper, it was still answered, though not very well, by a significant number of students. Correct
responses to the colour change required in the first part were rare, though more students could write an appropriate equation and outline why the
reaction occurred, even though this was often phrased in terms of electronegativity, rather than reactivity or electrode potential. In part (b) many
students seemed to be aware of the difference between strong and weak acids, but few could use this to answer the question asked and
frequently, even having displayed this knowledge, were unable to write an equation for the required reaction in water. Unfortunately changes in
pagination meant that the phrase “the equilibrium above” in part (b) (iii) may have confused candidates with regard to which particular equilibrium
the question referred to. Fortunately both of the equilibria that it could have referred to change in the same direction and students scored well on
this, and both would eventually result in the release of chlorine, that a number recognized as a toxic gas. In contrast to Question 1, many students
could correctly identify the hydrogen bonding, resulting from the –OH group, as being the reason for the solubility of HOCl in water. An encouraging
number of students gained full marks for calculating the pH of the buffer, usually by memorizing the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and
substituting in this. An even greater number of students could accurately explain the mode of action of acid-base indicators. In part (c) very few
students could write, much less combine, appropriate half equations, even though the reactants and products were given, but far more could
correctly deduce the oxidation numbers of the species involved. In the final part most students had some general idea of what a standard
electrode potential was, but in many cases the definitions lacked the detail required. Quite a few students correctly deduced that the oxidation of
chromium(III) to dichromate(VI) was energetically feasible and give valid reasons to support this.
b.iv.Though it was the least popular question on the paper, it was still answered, though not very well, by a significant number of students. Correct
responses to the colour change required in the first part were rare, though more students could write an appropriate equation and outline why the
reaction occurred, even though this was often phrased in terms of electronegativity, rather than reactivity or electrode potential. In part (b) many
students seemed to be aware of the difference between strong and weak acids, but few could use this to answer the question asked and
frequently, even having displayed this knowledge, were unable to write an equation for the required reaction in water. Unfortunately changes in
pagination meant that the phrase “the equilibrium above” in part (b) (iii) may have confused candidates with regard to which particular equilibrium
the question referred to. Fortunately both of the equilibria that it could have referred to change in the same direction and students scored well on
this, and both would eventually result in the release of chlorine, that a number recognized as a toxic gas. In contrast to Question 1, many students
could correctly identify the hydrogen bonding, resulting from the –OH group, as being the reason for the solubility of HOCl in water. An encouraging
number of students gained full marks for calculating the pH of the buffer, usually by memorizing the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and
substituting in this. An even greater number of students could accurately explain the mode of action of acid-base indicators. In part (c) very few
students could write, much less combine, appropriate half equations, even though the reactants and products were given, but far more could
correctly deduce the oxidation numbers of the species involved. In the final part most students had some general idea of what a standard
electrode potential was, but in many cases the definitions lacked the detail required. Quite a few students correctly deduced that the oxidation of
chromium(III) to dichromate(VI) was energetically feasible and give valid reasons to support this.
b.v.Though it was the least popular question on the paper, it was still answered, though not very well, by a significant number of students. Correct
responses to the colour change required in the first part were rare, though more students could write an appropriate equation and outline why the
reaction occurred, even though this was often phrased in terms of electronegativity, rather than reactivity or electrode potential. In part (b) many
students seemed to be aware of the difference between strong and weak acids, but few could use this to answer the question asked and
frequently, even having displayed this knowledge, were unable to write an equation for the required reaction in water. Unfortunately changes in
pagination meant that the phrase “the equilibrium above” in part (b) (iii) may have confused candidates with regard to which particular equilibrium
the question referred to. Fortunately both of the equilibria that it could have referred to change in the same direction and students scored well on
this, and both would eventually result in the release of chlorine, that a number recognized as a toxic gas. In contrast to Question 1, many students
could correctly identify the hydrogen bonding, resulting from the –OH group, as being the reason for the solubility of HOCl in water. An encouraging
number of students gained full marks for calculating the pH of the buffer, usually by memorizing the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and
substituting in this. An even greater number of students could accurately explain the mode of action of acid-base indicators. In part (c) very few
students could write, much less combine, appropriate half equations, even though the reactants and products were given, but far more could
correctly deduce the oxidation numbers of the species involved. In the final part most students had some general idea of what a standard
electrode potential was, but in many cases the definitions lacked the detail required. Quite a few students correctly deduced that the oxidation of
chromium(III) to dichromate(VI) was energetically feasible and give valid reasons to support this.
b.vi.Though it was the least popular question on the paper, it was still answered, though not very well, by a significant number of students. Correct
responses to the colour change required in the first part were rare, though more students could write an appropriate equation and outline why the
reaction occurred, even though this was often phrased in terms of electronegativity, rather than reactivity or electrode potential. In part (b) many
students seemed to be aware of the difference between strong and weak acids, but few could use this to answer the question asked and
frequently, even having displayed this knowledge, were unable to write an equation for the required reaction in water. Unfortunately changes in
pagination meant that the phrase “the equilibrium above” in part (b) (iii) may have confused candidates with regard to which particular equilibrium
the question referred to. Fortunately both of the equilibria that it could have referred to change in the same direction and students scored well on
this, and both would eventually result in the release of chlorine, that a number recognized as a toxic gas. In contrast to Question 1, many students
could correctly identify the hydrogen bonding, resulting from the –OH group, as being the reason for the solubility of HOCl in water. An encouraging
number of students gained full marks for calculating the pH of the buffer, usually by memorizing the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and
substituting in this. An even greater number of students could accurately explain the mode of action of acid-base indicators. In part (c) very few
students could write, much less combine, appropriate half equations, even though the reactants and products were given, but far more could
correctly deduce the oxidation numbers of the species involved. In the final part most students had some general idea of what a standard
electrode potential was, but in many cases the definitions lacked the detail required. Quite a few students correctly deduced that the oxidation of
chromium(III) to dichromate(VI) was energetically feasible and give valid reasons to support this.
c. Though it was the least popular question on the paper, it was still answered, though not very well, by a significant number of students. Correct
responses to the colour change required in the first part were rare, though more students could write an appropriate equation and outline why the
reaction occurred, even though this was often phrased in terms of electronegativity, rather than reactivity or electrode potential. In part (b) many
students seemed to be aware of the difference between strong and weak acids, but few could use this to answer the question asked and
frequently, even having displayed this knowledge, were unable to write an equation for the required reaction in water. Unfortunately changes in
pagination meant that the phrase “the equilibrium above” in part (b) (iii) may have confused candidates with regard to which particular equilibrium
the question referred to. Fortunately both of the equilibria that it could have referred to change in the same direction and students scored well on
this, and both would eventually result in the release of chlorine, that a number recognized as a toxic gas. In contrast to Question 1, many students
could correctly identify the hydrogen bonding, resulting from the –OH group, as being the reason for the solubility of HOCl in water. An encouraging
number of students gained full marks for calculating the pH of the buffer, usually by memorizing the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and
substituting in this. An even greater number of students could accurately explain the mode of action of acid-base indicators. In part (c) very few
students could write, much less combine, appropriate half equations, even though the reactants and products were given, but far more could
correctly deduce the oxidation numbers of the species involved. In the final part most students had some general idea of what a standard
electrode potential was, but in many cases the definitions lacked the detail required. Quite a few students correctly deduced that the oxidation of
chromium(III) to dichromate(VI) was energetically feasible and give valid reasons to support this.
d. Though it was the least popular question on the paper, it was still answered, though not very well, by a significant number of students. Correct
responses to the colour change required in the first part were rare, though more students could write an appropriate equation and outline why the
reaction occurred, even though this was often phrased in terms of electronegativity, rather than reactivity or electrode potential. In part (b) many
students seemed to be aware of the difference between strong and weak acids, but few could use this to answer the question asked and
frequently, even having displayed this knowledge, were unable to write an equation for the required reaction in water. Unfortunately changes in
pagination meant that the phrase “the equilibrium above” in part (b) (iii) may have confused candidates with regard to which particular equilibrium
the question referred to. Fortunately both of the equilibria that it could have referred to change in the same direction and students scored well on
this, and both would eventually result in the release of chlorine, that a number recognized as a toxic gas. In contrast to Question 1, many students
could correctly identify the hydrogen bonding, resulting from the –OH group, as being the reason for the solubility of HOCl in water. An encouraging
number of students gained full marks for calculating the pH of the buffer, usually by memorizing the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and
substituting in this. An even greater number of students could accurately explain the mode of action of acid-base indicators. In part (c) very few
students could write, much less combine, appropriate half equations, even though the reactants and products were given, but far more could
correctly deduce the oxidation numbers of the species involved. In the final part most students had some general idea of what a standard
electrode potential was, but in many cases the definitions lacked the detail required. Quite a few students correctly deduced that the oxidation of
chromium(III) to dichromate(VI) was energetically feasible and give valid reasons to support this.
2-methylbutan-2-ol, , is a liquid with a smell of camphor that was formerly used as a sedative. One way of producing it starts
with 2-methylbut-2-ene.
As well as 2-methylbutan-2-ol, the reaction also produces a small quantity of an optically active isomer, X.
2-methylbutan-2-ol can also be produced by the hydrolysis of 2-chloro-2-methylbutane, , with aqueous sodium hydroxide.
2-chloro-2-methylbutane contains some molecules with a molar mass of approximately and some with a molar mass of approximately
2-chloro-2-methylbutane can also be converted into compound Z by a two-stage reaction via compound Y:
b. Explain whether you would expect 2-methylbutan-2-ol to react with acidified potassium dichromate(VI). [2]
c.ii.State what optical activity indicates about the structure of the molecule. [1]
c.iii.Optical activity can be detected using a polarimeter. Explain how this works. [3]
e.ii.State the rate expression for this reaction and the units of the rate constant. [2]
e.iii.Suggest why, for some other halogenoalkanes, this hydrolysis is much more effective in alkaline rather than in neutral conditions. [1]
f.i. Outline why there are molecules with different molar masses. [1]
g.ii.State the reagent and any catalyst required for both the formation of Y and the conversion of Y into Z. [3]
Formation of Y:
Conversion of Y into Z:
Markscheme
a. water/ ;
Accept steam.
Award [2] for HBr and NaOH (two-stage process via the halogenoalkane).
b. not react;
Accept “contains an asymmetric/chiral carbon” or “contains a carbon bonded to four different groups”.
c.iv.
;
e.i.
(somewhere in mechanism);
/[R–Cl];
e.iii.hydroxide ion/ is a better nucleophile than water / hydroxide ion/ has negative charge;
g.i.
;
Accept the cyanide group as –CN without showing the triple bond.
g.ii.Formation of Y:
Conversion of Y into Z:
hydrogen/ ;
Examiners report
a. Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
b. Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
c.i. Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
c.ii.Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
c.iii.Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
c.iv.Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
d. Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
e.i. Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
e.ii.Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
e.iii.Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
f.i. Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
g.i. Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
g.ii.Many students could recall the reagents for the hydration of an alkene and recognize the alcohol as a tertiary alcohol that would not undergo
oxidation. Statements regarding optical activity often lacked precision and betrayed confusion with chirality. Very few could correctly describe how
a polarimeter worked, especially the second rotating sheet of polaroid, and students frequently drew the structure of 2-methylbutan-2-ol rather
than its chiral isomer. Most students stated that the alcohol was more polar than the alkene, but fewer mentioned that it could form hydrogen
bonds to water and even less linked this to the presence of the hydroxyl group. Almost all students recognized that the hydrolysis was , with
an encouraging number being able to write reasonable mechanisms, though many still lost marks through a lack of precision in where their curly
arrows started and ended. Many candidates also stated an appropriate rate equation along with the units of the rate constant. Very few students
linked the difference of two molar mass units to the presence in the molecule of chlorine, with its naturally occurring isotopes, and the discussion
of any effect on the hydrolysis rate often revealed a lack of clear thinking. In contrast many students correctly identified the nitrile as the
intermediate in the chain extension reaction and reagents for its formation and hydrogenation were generally well known.
Draw the Lewis structures, state the shapes and predict the bond angles for the following species.
b.i. [3]
b.ii. [3]
d. Explain, using diagrams, why is a polar molecule but is a non-polar molecule. [3]
f.iv.State the type of hybridization of the carbon and nitrogen atoms in . [2]
Markscheme
a.i. Group: number of valence/outer energy level electrons same;
a.ii.4;
Allow the mark if the correct individual orbitals (e.g. 2s etc.) are listed.
b.i.
;
octahedral/octahedron/square bipyramidal;
b.ii. ;
linear;
180°;
Penalize missing charge, missing bracket once only in (i) and (ii).
d. :
Award [1] for correct representation of the bent shape and [1] for showing the net dipole moment, or explaining it in words (unsymmetrical
distribution of charge).
:
Award [1] for correct representation of the linear shape and for showing the two equal but opposite dipoles or explaining it in words (symmetrical
distribution of charge).
For both species, allow either arrow or arrow with bar for representation of dipole moment.
Allow correct partial charges instead of the representation of the vector dipole moment.
f.ii. mixing/joining together/combining/merging of atomic orbitals to form molecular /new orbitals / orbitals of equal energy;
f.iii. bond:
bond:
sideways/parallel overlap with electron density above and below internuclear axis/ bond;
Award [1 max] for stating end-on/axial overlap for and sideways/parallel overlap for only i.e. without mentioning electron density OR
stating electron density between the two atoms/nuclei for above and below internuclear axis/ bond for i.e. without mentioning
overlap.
f.iv.
Accept sp3.
Examiners report
a.i. Part (a) was very poorly answered which was surprising at HL. Most candidates described groups correctly but only a small majority stated that for
b.i. For (b) VSEPR theory in general was well answered. The most common mistakes involved candidates failing to include square brackets or lone
pairs of electrons or charges. Four G2 comments stated that expanded octets are not on the syllabus. However, AS 14.1.1 states explicitly that
candidates should be able to predict the shape and bond angles of species of five and six negative charge centres. Four examples are included in
the teachers note, including , but it has to emphasized again, as in previous subject reports that examples should not be confined in teaching
programmes to just these four examples. Even is a clear example of an expanded octet type structure, as is , as asked in this question.
b.ii.There were five other G2 comments again stating the fact that is off-syllabus. Based on AS 4.2.7, this example is clearly on the syllabus as
the AS states that candidates should be able to predict the shape and bond angles of species of two, three and four negative charge centres. All
the examples in the teachers note should be covered at a minimum in the teaching programme, but these are not the only examples.
d. There were seven G2 comments referring to (d); some respondents felt that the candidates had to answer the question by determining the shape of
both and using VSEPR Theory. This is a classic example of candidates reading the question carefully and not making unnecessary
assumptions in relation to what is being asked. Only three marks are allocated to this question and hence this should be another clue as to suggest
that the answer can be given in a concise manner. All candidates had to do was determine the fact that both species are XY2 species (not XYZ
even) and hence can only be one of two geometries, either linear or bent. must be non-polar since it is a linear geometry and hence the two
dipole moments cancel each other out, yielding a net dipole moment of zero. In the case of , the geometry must be bent, and therefore there
is a net dipole moment meaning it is a polar molecule. A simple diagram of the two species with the two bond dipole moments in each case and
the resultant net dipole moment (in the case of ) would have scored both marks. There was no need to show lone pairs of electrons or isolated
electrons etc. to answer this question, as candidates were not asked to write Lewis structures etc. Some candidates wasted time here trying to
work these out and even some candidates thought that there might even be a mistake in the question and tried to answer the question with ,
because this is an example given in the teachers note in AS 14.3.1, based on delocalization.
The very best candidates did draw dipole moments, as the question did ask for diagrams, when explaining polarity, as opposed to simply a
description in words.
f.ii. Hybridization was usually well answered in part (ii), but sometimes candidates did not score the mark due to lack of specific subject vocabulary.
f.iii.Although candidates often had some understanding of sigma and pi bonding, very few mentioned electron density in (iii).
f.iv.For (iv) one G2 comment stated that the hybridization of N in will in fact be due to the planar nature of the group here in this
example, which is in fact correct, although it is unlikely that candidates at this level would know this. Nearly all candidates gave hybridization
for N, which they based on a perceived pyramidal type geometry, like in ammonia. For this reason, during GA, we decided to allow both
Ozone, , in the upper atmosphere prevents harmful UV radiation reaching the surface of the Earth.
b. State the shape of the ozone molecule and estimate the bond angle. [2]
Shape:
Bond angle:
d. In terms of and bonds, describe the two oxygen-oxygen bonds in the Lewis structure. [1]
e. The two oxygen-oxygen bonds in ozone are in fact of equal length. Deduce why this is the case and how the length of these would compare to [2]
Markscheme
b. Shape: non-linear / bent / v-shaped / angular;
c. ;
e. delocalization occurs / delocalized -bond / (has two) resonance structures / it is a resonance hybrid;
Examiners report
b. Many students scored well on this because, in order that candidates were not too heavily penalised, ECF was applied to the later parts of the
question based on the number of electron domains and bonding represented by the Lewis diagram drawn in part (a). Hence, although quite a few
students incorrectly tried to reflect the delocalization of ozone in their Lewis structures in part (a), their answers to the later parts of the question
were correct. In the final part quite a number of students appeared unable to deduce that hydrogen peroxide contains a single O–O bond.
c. Many students scored well on this because, in order that candidates were not too heavily penalised, ECF was applied to the later parts of the
question based on the number of electron domains and bonding represented by the Lewis diagram drawn in part (a). Hence, although quite a few
students incorrectly tried to reflect the delocalization of ozone in their Lewis structures in part (a), their answers to the later parts of the question
were correct. In the final part quite a number of students appeared unable to deduce that hydrogen peroxide contains a single O–O bond.
d. Many students scored well on this because, in order that candidates were not too heavily penalised, ECF was applied to the later parts of the
question based on the number of electron domains and bonding represented by the Lewis diagram drawn in part (a). Hence, although quite a few
students incorrectly tried to reflect the delocalization of ozone in their Lewis structures in part (a), their answers to the later parts of the question
were correct. In the final part quite a number of students appeared unable to deduce that hydrogen peroxide contains a single O–O bond.
e. Many students scored well on this because, in order that candidates were not too heavily penalised, ECF was applied to the later parts of the
question based on the number of electron domains and bonding represented by the Lewis diagram drawn in part (a). Hence, although quite a few
students incorrectly tried to reflect the delocalization of ozone in their Lewis structures in part (a), their answers to the later parts of the question
were correct. In the final part quite a number of students appeared unable to deduce that hydrogen peroxide contains a single O–O bond.
Hydrazine, N2H4, is a valuable rocket fuel.
The equation for the reaction between hydrazine and oxygen is given below.
a. (i) Draw the Lewis (electron dot) structure for N2H4 showing all valence electrons. [4]
b. Hydrazine and ethene, C2H4, are hydrides of adjacent elements in the periodic table. The boiling point of hydrazine is much higher than that of [2]
ethene. Explain this difference in terms of the intermolecular forces in each compound.
c. (i) The enthalpy change of formation, , of liquid hydrazine is . Use this value, together with data from Table 12 of the Data [16]
(ii) Use the bond enthalpy values from Table 10 of the Data Booklet to determine the enthalpy change for this reaction.
(iii) Identify the calculation that produces the most accurate value for the enthalpy change for the reaction given and explain your choice.
(iv) Calculate for the reaction using the data below and comment on its magnitude.
(vi) Predict, giving a reason, the spontaneity of the reaction above at both high and low temperatures.
d. The reaction between and HCl(aq) can be represented by the following equation. [3]
Markscheme
a.
(i) ;
c. (i) ;
(bond energy calculation) only applies to gaseous states / ignores intermolecular bonds;
(iv) ;
(v) ;
d. (i) acid-base/neutralization;
(ii) 109°/109.5°;
(iii) sp3;
Examiners report
a. The Lewis structure for hydrazine proved to be difficult for some in (a). Incorrect answers had double bonds appearing between the two nitrogen
atoms or lone pairs missing. Those who could draw the correct structure in (i) gave the correct bond angle, but the explanation was often
incomplete. Few mentioned either the four electron domains around the central atom or the extra repulsion of the lone pair.
b. In part (b) most candidates knew that hydrogen bonding was present in hydrazine and Van der Waals‟ forces in ethene but failed to give a
c. Some candidates struggled to calculate the enthalpy changes from enthalpy changes of formation in (c) (i) as they were unable to relate the
d. The bond energy and entropy calculations were more successful with many candidates benefitting from ECF from their incorrect Lewis structures
in (a). It was encouraging to see many correct unit conversions for the calculation of . A number of candidates incorrectly described the
combination of hydrazine and hydrochloric acid as a redox reaction, but many were able to identify the bond angle and hybridization in .
Carbon and silicon belong to the same group of the periodic table.
d. Describe the delocalization of pi ( ) electrons and explain how this can account for the structure and stability of the carbonate ion, . [3]
e. Explain the meaning of the term hybridization. State the type of hybridization shown by the carbon atoms in carbon dioxide, diamond, graphite [5]
f.i. Explain the electrical conductivity of molten sodium oxide and liquid sulfur trioxide. [2]
f.ii. Samples of sodium oxide and solid sulfur trioxide are added to separate beakers of water. Deduce the equation for each reaction and predict [3]
Markscheme
d. /Co-60/cobalt-60 and radiotherapy/sterilization of medical supplies/radiation treatment of food sterilizations/industrial radiography/density
OR
Diamond: ;
Graphite: ;
Carbonate ion: ;
f.i. Molten sodium oxide: conducts because of free moving/mobile ions in molten state;
Sulfur trioxide: doesn’t conduct because no free moving/mobile charged particles/it has neutral molecules;
Award [1 max] for stating molten sodium oxide conducts but sulfur trioxide doesn’t.
Do not award M2 for “just sulfur trioxide does not conduct because it is molecular.”
f.ii. ;
Examiners report
d. (d) was poorly answered since candidates were unable to logically structure their response often a description of pi bonding alone was given.
e. (e) usually was well done, although the precise meaning of hybridization was rarely given. Sometimes an incorrect hybridization of was given
for diamond.
f.i. In (f), most candidates were unable to state that molten sodium oxide is able to conduct electricity because the current is carried by mobile ions
(not delocalized electrons). Most did not realise that molten sulfur trioxide consists of neutral molecules and therefore does not conduct an electric
current.
f.ii. Most were able to write the balanced chemical equations but then were not able to state that both solutions conduct. Many often gave the
Freshly prepared iron(II) bromide can be electrolysed both in the liquid state and in aqueous solution.
a.ii.Deduce, using equations where appropriate, if bromine reacts with sodium chloride solution and with sodium iodide solution. [2]
b.i. Describe the bonding in metals and explain their malleability. [3]
b.v.Draw the abbreviated orbital diagram for an iron atom using the arrow-in-box notation to represent electrons. [1]
b.vi.Draw the abbreviated orbital diagram for the iron ion in [Fe(CN)6]3– using the arrow-in-box notation to represent electrons. [1]
c.i. Describe, using a diagram, the essential components of an electrolytic cell. [3]
c.ii.Describe the two ways in which current is conducted in an electrolytic cell. [2]
c.iii.Predict and explain the products of electrolysis of a dilute iron(II) bromide solution. [4]
c.iv.Identify another product that is formed if the solution of iron(II) bromide is concentrated. [1]
Markscheme
a.i. reactivity decreases down group;
atoms/ions/layers (of positive ions) can slide over each other / OWTTE;
catalytic (behaviour)
b.iii.dative (covalent)/coordinate;
b.iv.III / ;
b.v.
Do not accept full orbital diagram; penalise only once in (v) and (vi).
b.vi.
;
c.i.
Accept power supply if shown as conventional long/short lines (as in diagram above) or clearly labelled DC power supply.
labelled electrolyte/FeBr2(l)/FeBr2(aq);
c.ii.Electrolyte: positive ions/cations move to negative electrode/cathode and negative ions/anions to positive electrode/anode;
Conductors: electrons flow from negative pole of battery to positive pole of battery / OWTTE;
c.iii.Negative electrode/cathode:
is less negative than / Fe is more reactive than / is lower in reactivity series / more easily reduced than Fe2+ /
OWTTE;
Positive electrode/anode:
c.iv. ;
Accept Fe.
confusing electronegativity with electron affinity. Most knew about the reactions (or lack thereof) of bromine but the equations were sometimes
a.ii.This was the least popular of the Section B questions. In (a) (i) the trend was generally correctly identified but the reasons were not clear, many
confusing electronegativity with electron affinity. Most knew about the reactions (or lack thereof) of bromine but the equations were sometimes
b.i. There was a tendency to describe the bonding of metals in terms of nuclei rather than cations and malleability was not well understood.
b.ii.The properties in (b) (ii) were surprisingly poor. Many suggested that the metals themselves are coloured rather than the compounds, for instance.
b.iii.The bonding in (iii) was not well known but the oxidation number was generally answered correctly.
[N/A]
b.iv.
b.v.In (v), some candidates gave the full orbital diagram, some omitted [Ar] – and some just got it wrong!
b.vi.[N/A]
c.i. The diagrams in (c) were poorly presented and often inaccurate (much confusion with a voltaic cell) and there was little understanding of how
c.ii.The diagrams in (c) were poorly presented and often inaccurate (much confusion with a voltaic cell) and there was little understanding of how
c.iii.In (iii), few candidates correctly predicted the products of electrolysis of dilute iron bromide, with many seeming to ignore the presence of hydrogen
ions/hydroxide ions/water; correct explanations in terms of electrode potentials or preferential discharge were rare.
c.iv.In (iii), few candidates correctly predicted the products of electrolysis of dilute iron bromide, with many seeming to ignore the presence of hydrogen
ions/hydroxide ions/water; correct explanations in terms of electrode potentials or preferential discharge were rare. Despite this, bromine was often
Copper is a metal that has been used by humans for thousands of years.
b. State one difference in the physical properties of the isotopes and and explain why their chemical properties are the same. [2]
Physical:
Chemical:
c. Describe the bonding in solid copper. [2]
Markscheme
a. ;
b. Physical:
Chemical:
Do not accept “same number of electrons” OR “same valence (electrons)” OR “same atomic number” only.
c. electrostatic attraction;
Examiners report
a. Most were able to quote the electron configuration of copper correctly; but some gave [Ar] when they were specifically asked for the full
configuration. A few, inevitably gave . In (b), few related the difference in mass to a property and most did not give the comparison; “the
same number of electrons and protons” was more popular than “the same electron configuration”. The descriptions of metallic bonding were
disappointing; the mark for electrostatic attraction was rarely scored and many confused “nuclei” with “cations/positive ions”.
b. Most were able to quote the electron configuration of copper correctly; but some gave [Ar] when they were specifically asked for the full
configuration. A few, inevitably gave . In (b), few related the difference in mass to a property and most did not give the comparison; “the
same number of electrons and protons” was more popular than “the same electron configuration”. The descriptions of metallic bonding were
disappointing; the mark for electrostatic attraction was rarely scored and many confused “nuclei” with “cations/positive ions”.
c. Most were able to quote the electron configuration of copper correctly; but some gave [Ar] when they were specifically asked for the full
configuration. A few, inevitably gave . In (b), few related the difference in mass to a property and most did not give the comparison; “the
same number of electrons and protons” was more popular than “the same electron configuration”. The descriptions of metallic bonding were
disappointing; the mark for electrostatic attraction was rarely scored and many confused “nuclei” with “cations/positive ions”.
Titanium and vanadium are consecutive elements in the first transition metal series.
reacts with water and the resulting titanium(IV) oxide can be used as a smoke screen.
a. Describe the bonding in metals. [2]
b. Titanium exists as several isotopes. The mass spectrum of a sample of titanium gave the following data: [2]
c. State the number of protons, neutrons and electrons in the atom. [1]
d.ii.Suggest why the melting point of vanadium is higher than that of titanium. [1]
d.iii.Sketch a graph of the first six successive ionization energies of vanadium on the axes provided. [1]
e. Describe, in terms of the electrons involved, how the bond between a ligand and a central metal ion is formed. [1]
g.i. State the type of bonding in potassium chloride which melts at 1043 K. [1]
g.ii.A chloride of titanium, , melts at 248 K. Suggest why the melting point is so much lower than that of KCl. [1]
Markscheme
a. electrostatic attraction
[2 marks]
b.
Answer must have two decimal places with a value from 47.90 to 48.00.
[2 marks]
[1 mark]
d.i.
[1 mark]
Accept vanadium has «one» more valence electron«s» «leading to stronger metallic bonding».
[1 mark]
d.iii.
regular increase for first five AND sharp increase to the 6th
[1 mark]
OR
[2 marks]
[1 mark]
light is absorbed as electrons transit to a higher energy level «in d–d transitions»
OR
light is absorbed as electrons are promoted
[4 marks]
g.i. ionic
OR
[1 mark]
OR
weak«er» intermolecular bonds
OR
[1 mark]
correct balancing
[2 marks]
OR
HCl is an irritant
OR
HCl is toxic
OR
OR
HCl is corrosive
problems/is an irritant.
[1 mark]
Examiners report
[N/A]
a.
[N/A]
b.
[N/A]
c.
[N/A]
d.i.
[N/A]
d.ii.
[N/A]
d.iii.
[N/A]
d.iv.
[N/A]
e.
[N/A]
f.
[N/A]
g.i.
[N/A]
g.ii.
[N/A]
h.i.
[N/A]
h.ii.
The concentration of a solution of a weak acid, such as ethanedioic acid, can be determined
c. 5.00 g of an impure sample of hydrated ethanedioic acid, (COOH)2•2H2O, was dissolved in water to make 1.00 dm3 of solution. 25.0 cm3 [6]
samples of this solution were titrated against a 0.100 mol dm-3 solution of sodium hydroxide using a suitable indicator.
(i) Suggest a suitable indicator for this titration. Use section 22 of the data booklet.
(ii) Calculate the amount, in mol, of NaOH in 14.0 cm3 of 0.100 mol dm-3 solution.
(iii) Calculate the amount, in mol, of ethanedioic acid in each 25.0 cm3 sample.
(iv) Determine the percentage purity of the hydrated ethanedioic acid sample.
d. Draw the Lewis (electron dot) structure of the ethanedioate ion, –OOCCOO–. [1]
e. Outline why all the C–O bond lengths in the ethanedioate ion are the same length and suggest a value for them. Use section 10 of the data [2]
booklet.
Markscheme
c. i
phenolphthalein
OR
phenol red
ii
«n(NaOH) = dm3 × 0.100 mol dm-3 =» 1.40 × 10-3 «mol»
iii
« × 1.40 × 10-3 =» 7.00 × 10-4 «mol»
iv
ALTERNATIVE 1:
«mass of pure hydrated ethanedioic acid in each titration = 7.00 × 10-4 mol × 126.08 g mol-1 =» 0.0883 / 8.83 × 10-2 «g»
ALTERNATIVE 2:
«mol of pure hydrated ethanedioic acid in 1 dm3 solution = 7.00 × 10-4 × =» 2.80 × 10-2 «mol»
«mass of pure hydrated ethanedioic acid in sample = 2.80 × 10-2 mol × 126.08 g mol-1 =» 3.53 «g»
«% purity = × 100 =» 70.6 «%»
ALTERNATIVE 3:
mol of hydrated ethanedioic acid (assuming sample to be pure) = = 0.03966 «mol»
actual amount of hydrated ethanedioic acid = «7.00 × 10-4 × =» 2.80 × 10-2 «mol»
d.
OR
resonance occurs
OR
Examiners report
[N/A]
c.
[N/A]
d.
[N/A]
e.
[N/A]
f.
Bonds can be formed in many ways.
The equilibrium for a mixture of NO2 and N2O4 gases is represented as:
2NO2(g) N2O4(g)
b.ii.Deduce one resonance structure of ozone and the corresponding formal charges on each oxygen atom. [2]
c. The first six ionization energies, in kJ mol–1, of an element are given below. [2]
d.i. At a given time, the concentration of NO2(g) and N2O4(g) were 0.52 and respectively. [2]
Deduce, showing your reasoning, if the forward or the reverse reaction is favoured at this time.
d.ii.Comment on the value of ΔG when the reaction quotient equals the equilibrium constant, Q = K. [2]
Markscheme
b.i. lone pair on p orbital «of O atom» overlaps/delocalizes with pi electrons «from double bond»
[3 marks]
b.ii.ALTERNATIVE 1:
ALTERNATIVE 2:
FC: 0 AND +1 AND –1
[2 marks]
OR
[2 marks]
OR
[2 marks]
d.ii.ΔG = 0
reaction at equilibrium
OR
OR
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
[N/A]
b.ii.
b.i.
c. [N/A]
[N/A]
d.i.
[N/A]
d.ii.
Some physical properties of molecular substances result from the different types of forces between their molecules.
Resonance structures exist when a molecule can be represented by more than one Lewis structure.
c.i. Carbon dioxide can be represented by at least two resonance structures, I and II. [2]
Calculate the formal charge on each oxygen atom in the two structures.
d. Absorption of UV light in the ozone layer causes the dissociation of oxygen and ozone. [2]
Identify, in terms of bonding, the molecule that requires a longer wavelength to dissociate.
Markscheme
c.i.
[2 marks]
OR
[1 mark]
d. O3 has bond between single and double bond AND O2 has double bond
OR
OR
M1: Do not accept “ozone has one single and one double bond”.
[2 marks]
e. CO2 «non-polar» «weak» London/dispersion forces/instantaneous induced dipole-induced dipole forces between molecules
[2 marks]
Examiners report
c.i. [N/A]
[N/A]
c.ii.
[N/A]
d.
e. [N/A]
All the isomers react when warmed with a dilute aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide according to the equation below.
a. Deduce the name of one of the isomers which can exist as enantiomers and draw three-dimensional representations of its two enantiomers. [3]
b.i. The reaction with 1-bromopentane proceeds by an mechanism. Describe this mechanism using structural formulas and curly arrows to [3]
b.ii.The reaction with 2-bromo-2-methylbutane proceeds by an mechanism. Describe this mechanism using structural formulas and curly [3]
b.iii.Explain why 1-bromopentane reacts by an mechanism whereas 2-bromo-2-methylbutane reacts by an mechanism. [3]
b.iv.Explain whether the boiling point of 1-bromopentane will be higher, lower or the same as that of 2-bromo-2-methylbutane. [3]
b.v.The product formed from the reaction with 1-bromopentane is warmed with ethanoic acid in the presence of a few drops of [2]
concentrated sulfuric acid. State the name of the type of reaction taking place and the structural formula of the organic product.
Markscheme
a.
2-bromopentane
OR
1-bromo-2-methylbutane
OR
2-bromo-3-methylbutane
correct name;
b.i.
Do not allow curly arrow originating on H in (e.g. originating on negative charge on H i.e. lone pair/negative charge must be on O).
curly arrow from C–Br bond to form (this can also be shown in transition state);
Accept condensed formulas as long as curly arrows can still be shown e.g.
Accept
b.ii.
If non-bonding pair not shown then arrow must originate from negative sign on O or the minus sign.
b.iii.the C bonded to the Br in 1-bromopentane is also bonded to two H atoms so can accommodate five groups around it in the transition state /
OWTTE;
the C bonded to the Br in 2-bromo-2-methylbutane has three other (bulky) groups bonded to it so cannot accommodate five groups around it in
the transition state / OWTTE;
2-bromo-2-methylbutane forms a tertiary carbocation which is stabilized by the positive inductive effect of the three alkyl groups / OWTTE;
1-bromopentane would form a primary carbocation (if it went by ) which is much less stable as there is only one alkyl group exerting a positive
inductive effect / OWTTE;
b.iv.the boiling point of 1-bromopentane is higher than the boiling point of 2-bromo-2-methylbutane;
2-bromo-2-methylbutane is more spherical in shape / less surface area in contact between molecules of 2-bromo-2-methylbutane than between
molecules of 1-bromopentane / OWTTE;
hence weaker intermolecular forces of attraction/van der Waals’ forces of attraction between molecules of 2-bromo-2-methylbutane / OWTTE;
b.v.esterification / condensation;
;
Accept CH3–CO–O–C5H11
Examiners report
a. Although the least popular question, candidates were generally well prepared particularly in drawing enantiomers and describing the mechanisms
b.i. The representation of the and mechanisms using curly arrows has significantly improved from previous sessions but mistakes are still
being made.
Common errors in the mechanism include the curly arrow originating from the H in the hydroxide ion instead of the lone pair on the oxygen
and the omission of the negative charge or square brackets from the transition state.
b.ii.It was also disappointing to see H–C bonds in the transition state and HO–C–Br angles of less than 180°. If a candidate fully understood that the
attack must be on the opposite side from the leaving group than this type of mistake would not appear. Explanations of why primary
halogenoalkanes undergo reactions and why primary structures favour reactions in terms of steric hindrance and carbocation stability
were often incomplete with few candidates gaining full marks. Students should note that when asked to compare two molecules, their answers
should refer explicitly to both; i.e. they had to mention that a tertiary compound halogenoalkane did have steric hindrance and a primary
compound did not have steric hindrance. Some candidates also struggled to gave a full explanation of the higher boiling point of 1-bromopentane
in terms of the greater surface contact between neighbouring molecules. Most candidates were familiar with the esterification reaction and able to
give the structural formula of pentyl ethanoate. The prediction of the organic products of the elimination reaction proved to be beyond many, as
candidates struggled to apply their knowledge in an unfamiliar context. Similarly, many were unable to give the equation for the condensation
polymerisation reaction between benzene-1,4-dicarboxylc acid and pentane-1,5-diol. A significant number of students misread the question and
b.iii.It was also disappointing to see H–C bonds in the transition state and HO–C–Br angles of less than 180°. If a candidate fully understood that the
attack must be on the opposite side from the leaving group than this type of mistake would not appear. Explanations of why primary
halogenoalkanes undergo reactions and why primary structures favour reactions in terms of steric hindrance and carbocation stability
were often incomplete with few candidates gaining full marks. Students should note that when asked to compare two molecules, their answers
should refer explicitly to both; i.e. they had to mention that a tertiary compound halogenoalkane did have steric hindrance and a primary
compound did not have steric hindrance. Some candidates also struggled to gave a full explanation of the higher boiling point of 1-bromopentane
in terms of the greater surface contact between neighbouring molecules. Most candidates were familiar with the esterification reaction and able to
give the structural formula of pentyl ethanoate. The prediction of the organic products of the elimination reaction proved to be beyond many, as
candidates struggled to apply their knowledge in an unfamiliar context. Similarly, many were unable to give the equation for the condensation
polymerisation reaction between benzene-1,4-dicarboxylc acid and pentane-1,5-diol. A significant number of students misread the question and
b.iv.It was also disappointing to see H–C bonds in the transition state and HO–C–Br angles of less than 180°. If a candidate fully understood that the
attack must be on the opposite side from the leaving group than this type of mistake would not appear. Explanations of why primary
halogenoalkanes undergo reactions and why primary structures favour reactions in terms of steric hindrance and carbocation stability
were often incomplete with few candidates gaining full marks. Students should note that when asked to compare two molecules, their answers
should refer explicitly to both; i.e. they had to mention that a tertiary compound halogenoalkane did have steric hindrance and a primary
compound did not have steric hindrance. Some candidates also struggled to gave a full explanation of the higher boiling point of 1-bromopentane
in terms of the greater surface contact between neighbouring molecules. Most candidates were familiar with the esterification reaction and able to
give the structural formula of pentyl ethanoate. The prediction of the organic products of the elimination reaction proved to be beyond many, as
candidates struggled to apply their knowledge in an unfamiliar context. Similarly, many were unable to give the equation for the condensation
polymerisation reaction between benzene-1,4-dicarboxylc acid and pentane-1,5-diol. A significant number of students misread the question and
attack must be on the opposite side from the leaving group than this type of mistake would not appear. Explanations of why primary
halogenoalkanes undergo reactions and why primary structures favour reactions in terms of steric hindrance and carbocation stability
were often incomplete with few candidates gaining full marks. Students should note that when asked to compare two molecules, their answers
should refer explicitly to both; i.e. they had to mention that a tertiary compound halogenoalkane did have steric hindrance and a primary
compound did not have steric hindrance. Some candidates also struggled to gave a full explanation of the higher boiling point of 1-bromopentane
in terms of the greater surface contact between neighbouring molecules. Most candidates were familiar with the esterification reaction and able to
give the structural formula of pentyl ethanoate. The prediction of the organic products of the elimination reaction proved to be beyond many, as
candidates struggled to apply their knowledge in an unfamiliar context. Similarly, many were unable to give the equation for the condensation
polymerisation reaction between benzene-1,4-dicarboxylc acid and pentane-1,5-diol. A significant number of students misread the question and
b.i. State the IUPAC names of each of the compounds, D, E, F and G. [2]
D:
E:
F:
G:
b.iii.State the reagents and reaction conditions used to convert D to E and D to F directly. [2]
Allow 4-methyl-1-pentanol.
E: 4-methylpentanal;
F: 4-methylpentanoic acid;
G: 4-methylpentyl ethanoate;
Award [2] for all four correct, [1 max] for two or three correct.
Award [1 max] if all suffices correct but prefix (4-methyl or pent) not correct.
Suitable oxidizing agents are potassium dichromate(VI)/K2Cr2O7 / sodium dichromate(VI)/Na2Cr2O7 / dichromate/Cr2O72– / potassium
manganate(VII)/potassium permanganate/KMnO4 / permanganate/manganate(VII)/MnO4–.
Allow potassium dichromate or sodium dichromate (i.e. without (VI)) or potassium manganate (i.e. without (VII).
Conditions:
Award [1 max] if correct reagents and conditions identified for one process only.
b.iv.Volatility:
Examiners report
b.i. Many candidates only scored one mark.
Lithium and boron are elements in period 2 of the periodic table. Lithium occurs in group 1 (the alkali metals) and boron occurs in group 3. Isotopes
a.iii.The electron configuration of boron is . Draw the shape of an s orbital and a orbital on the axes below. [1]
b. (ii) Cobalt is a transition metal. One common ion of cobalt is . Draw the orbital diagram (using the arrow-in-box notation) for the [5]
ion.
Markscheme
a.iii.symmetrical shape of s orbital and dumbbell-shaped p orbital with electron density along x-axis;
b. (ii)
Do not allow arrows with the same spin for example or in the same orbital.
(iii) ;
(colour due to) electron transition between (split) d orbitals / d to d transitions / frequencies of visible light absorbed by electrons moving from lower
to higher d levels ;
Examiners report
a.iii.In part (iii), a common mistake involved candidates drawing the lobe of electron density around the y or z axes for the orbital. Some candidates
drew three dumbells for the s-orbital. Other candidates incorrectly drew hybrid orbitals.
b. The orbital diagram in (ii) also proved to be quite a good discriminating question. Many candidates failed to realise that the electrons are removed
from the 4s level before the 3d for a first-row transition metal ion. In addition, a significant number of candidates showed poor understanding of
Hund‟s Rule of Maximum Multiplicity which states that when degenerate orbitals are available, electrons fill the orbitals singly before filling them in
pairs. Hence, in many cases incorrect representations were seen for the 3d which involved three pairs of electrons of opposite spin being inserted
in three 3d orbitals. Most candidates stated the ion, though a common incorrect answer was . Part (iv) involved candidates having to
explain why the complex is coloured. This question was asked a number of times in previous examinations and previously was
typically really very poorly answered. In N12, the explanations certainly were better though some candidates mixed up the principles of the line
emission spectrum of hydrogen with the d to d transitions involved in the explanation of colour pertaining to a transition metal complex.
Two chemistry students wished to determine the enthalpy of hydration of anhydrous magnesium sulfate. They measured the initial and the highest
temperature reached when anhydrous magnesium sulfate, , was dissolved in water. They presented their results in the table below.
The students repeated the experiment using 6.16 g of solid hydrated magnesium sulfate, , and of water. They found the
enthalpy change, , to be .
The enthalpy of hydration of solid anhydrous magnesium sulfate is difficult to determine experimentally, but can be determined using the diagram
below.
(ii) Calculate the enthalpy change, , for anhydrous magnesium sulfate dissolving in water, in . State your answer to the correct
number of significant figures.
b. (i) Determine the enthalpy change, , in , for the hydration of solid anhydrous magnesium sulfate, . [2]
(ii) The literature value for the enthalpy of hydration of anhydrous magnesium sulfate is . Calculate the percentage difference
between the literature value and the value determined from experimental results, giving your answer to one decimal place. (If you did not obtain
an answer for the experimental value in (b)(i) then use the value of , but this is not the correct value.)
c. Another group of students experimentally determined an enthalpy of hydration of . Outline two reasons which may explain the [2]
d. Magnesium sulfate is one of the products formed when acid rain reacts with dolomitic limestone. This limestone is a mixture of magnesium [6]
(i) State the equation for the reaction of sulfuric acid with magnesium carbonate.
(ii) Deduce the Lewis (electron dot) structure of the carbonate ion, giving the shape and the oxygen-carbon-oxygen bond angle.
Shape:
Bond angle:
(iii) There are three possible Lewis structures that can be drawn for the carbonate ion, which lead to a resonance structure. Explain, with
reference to the electrons, why all carbon-oxygen bonds have the same length.
(iv) Deduce the hybridization of the carbon atom in the carbonate ion.
Markscheme
a. (i) ;
b. (i) ;
(ii) ;
Accept answer of 2.9% if –100 used but only if a value for (b)(i) is not present.
Award [1] if –104 is used giving an answer of 1.0% .
is impure;
literature values determined under standard conditions, but this experiment is not;
d. (i) ;
(ii) ;
Accept answers trigonal/triangular planar and 120° if M1 incorrect, but no other answers should be given credit.
(iii) (pi/ ) electrons are delocalized/spread over more than two nuclei / charge spread (equally) over all three oxygens;
(iv) ;
Examiners report
a. The use of 3.01 for the mass in the expression in was common, candidates were able to score in the subsequent parts and many did
so, although there was often a confusion between the value Q and the required answer for . In part c) most candidates understood the error
due to heat loss, but few scored the second mark, usually quoting an answer involving an error generally that was far too vague. The inability to
construct a balanced equation was disappointing, many lost credit for giving as a product. The score for the structure of the carbonate ion
was often lost due to the failure to show that a charge is present on the ion, however, the shape and bond angle were known well, as was
so, although there was often a confusion between the value Q and the required answer for . In part c) most candidates understood the error
due to heat loss, but few scored the second mark, usually quoting an answer involving an error generally that was far too vague. The inability to
construct a balanced equation was disappointing, many lost credit for giving as a product. The score for the structure of the carbonate ion
was often lost due to the failure to show that a charge is present on the ion, however, the shape and bond angle were known well, as was
c. The use of 3.01 for the mass in the expression in was common, candidates were able to score in the subsequent parts and many did
so, although there was often a confusion between the value Q and the required answer for . In part c) most candidates understood the error
due to heat loss, but few scored the second mark, usually quoting an answer involving an error generally that was far too vague. The inability to
construct a balanced equation was disappointing, many lost credit for giving as a product. The score for the structure of the carbonate ion
was often lost due to the failure to show that a charge is present on the ion, however, the shape and bond angle were known well, as was
d. The use of 3.01 for the mass in the expression in was common, candidates were able to score in the subsequent parts and many did
so, although there was often a confusion between the value Q and the required answer for . In part c) most candidates understood the error
due to heat loss, but few scored the second mark, usually quoting an answer involving an error generally that was far too vague. The inability to
construct a balanced equation was disappointing, many lost credit for giving as a product. The score for the structure of the carbonate ion
was often lost due to the failure to show that a charge is present on the ion, however, the shape and bond angle were known well, as was
a.i. State the formula of both ions present and the nature of the force between these ions. [2]
Ions:
Nature of force:
b. Bonding in the nitrate ion involves electron delocalization. Explain the meaning of electron delocalization and how it affects the ion. [2]
c.ii.State one product formed from their reaction with water. [1]
c.iii.State one environmental problem caused by these atmospheric pollutants. [1]
Markscheme
a.i. and ;
electrostatic (attraction);
b. pi/ -electrons shared by more than two atoms/nuclei / a pi/ -bond/overlapping p-orbitals that extends over more than two atoms/nuclei;
all (N–O) bonds equal length/strength/bond-order / charge on all oxygen/O atoms equal / increases stability/lowers PE (of the ion);
Do not accept combustion/burning, cars, planes, jets, factories, power plants etc.
c.iii.acid deposition/rain / respiratory problems / corrosion problems / decomposition of ozone layer / photochemical smog / acidification/pollution of
Accept “acid rain” in either part (ii) or part (iii) but not both.
Examiners report
a.i. It was distressing how many students taking HL Chemistry (over 50%?) do not know the formula of the nitrate ion! Many students also gave the
type of bonding present between the ions, rather than the nature of the force asked for, though almost all could correctly identify the covalently
bonded atoms. Hardly any could explain delocalization in terms of the overlap of p-orbitals, or the extension of a -bond, over more than two
atoms, though its effect on structure and stability were better known. In part (c), which tested Aim 8 of the syllabus, most managed to gain some of
the marks available for atmospheric pollution from oxides of nitrogen. Inevitably, owing to some overlap in assessment statements these concepts
would be more familiar to those studying the Environmental Chemistry option, but undoubtedly studying other options assists in other areas, such
as organic chemistry.
a.ii.It was distressing how many students taking HL Chemistry (over 50%?) do not know the formula of the nitrate ion! Many students also gave the
type of bonding present between the ions, rather than the nature of the force asked for, though almost all could correctly identify the covalently
bonded atoms. Hardly any could explain delocalization in terms of the overlap of p-orbitals, or the extension of a -bond, over more than two
atoms, though its effect on structure and stability were better known. In part (c), which tested Aim 8 of the syllabus, most managed to gain some of
the marks available for atmospheric pollution from oxides of nitrogen. Inevitably, owing to some overlap in assessment statements these concepts
would be more familiar to those studying the Environmental Chemistry option, but undoubtedly studying other options assists in other areas, such
as organic chemistry.
b. It was distressing how many students taking HL Chemistry (over 50%?) do not know the formula of the nitrate ion! Many students also gave the
type of bonding present between the ions, rather than the nature of the force asked for, though almost all could correctly identify the covalently
bonded atoms. Hardly any could explain delocalization in terms of the overlap of p-orbitals, or the extension of a -bond, over more than two
atoms, though its effect on structure and stability were better known. In part (c), which tested Aim 8 of the syllabus, most managed to gain some of
the marks available for atmospheric pollution from oxides of nitrogen. Inevitably, owing to some overlap in assessment statements these concepts
would be more familiar to those studying the Environmental Chemistry option, but undoubtedly studying other options assists in other areas, such
as organic chemistry.
c.i. It was distressing how many students taking HL Chemistry (over 50%?) do not know the formula of the nitrate ion! Many students also gave the
type of bonding present between the ions, rather than the nature of the force asked for, though almost all could correctly identify the covalently
bonded atoms. Hardly any could explain delocalization in terms of the overlap of p-orbitals, or the extension of a -bond, over more than two
atoms, though its effect on structure and stability were better known. In part (c), which tested Aim 8 of the syllabus, most managed to gain some of
the marks available for atmospheric pollution from oxides of nitrogen. Inevitably, owing to some overlap in assessment statements these concepts
would be more familiar to those studying the Environmental Chemistry option, but undoubtedly studying other options assists in other areas, such
as organic chemistry.
c.ii.It was distressing how many students taking HL Chemistry (over 50%?) do not know the formula of the nitrate ion! Many students also gave the
type of bonding present between the ions, rather than the nature of the force asked for, though almost all could correctly identify the covalently
bonded atoms. Hardly any could explain delocalization in terms of the overlap of p-orbitals, or the extension of a -bond, over more than two
atoms, though its effect on structure and stability were better known. In part (c), which tested Aim 8 of the syllabus, most managed to gain some of
the marks available for atmospheric pollution from oxides of nitrogen. Inevitably, owing to some overlap in assessment statements these concepts
would be more familiar to those studying the Environmental Chemistry option, but undoubtedly studying other options assists in other areas, such
as organic chemistry.
c.iii.It was distressing how many students taking HL Chemistry (over 50%?) do not know the formula of the nitrate ion! Many students also gave the
type of bonding present between the ions, rather than the nature of the force asked for, though almost all could correctly identify the covalently
bonded atoms. Hardly any could explain delocalization in terms of the overlap of p-orbitals, or the extension of a -bond, over more than two
atoms, though its effect on structure and stability were better known. In part (c), which tested Aim 8 of the syllabus, most managed to gain some of
the marks available for atmospheric pollution from oxides of nitrogen. Inevitably, owing to some overlap in assessment statements these concepts
would be more familiar to those studying the Environmental Chemistry option, but undoubtedly studying other options assists in other areas, such
as organic chemistry.
Magnesium, a reactive metal found in many common minerals, is also an essential nutrient for both plants and animals.
Magnesium metal is mainly used as a component in lightweight alloys, particularly in combination with aluminium and titanium.
b. (i) Explain why the second ionization energy is greater than the first ionization energy. [4]
(ii) Explain why the third ionization energy is much greater than the second ionization energy.
c. Although magnesium is usually found as in its compounds, it is possible to use the Born-Haber cycle to investigate the possibility of [3]
Use the ionization energy data from part (b), along with the other data provided below, to determine the enthalpy change of formation of
MgCl(s). Assume that, because would be similar in size to , MgCl would have a similar lattice enthalpy to NaCl.
Enthalpy of atomization of Mg
Bond enthalpy in
Electron affinity of Cl
d. Consider the lattice enthalpies of , and . List these from the most endothermic to the least endothermic and explain your [3]
order.
e. Magnesium hydroxide, , is only sparingly soluble in water and the equilibrium below exists when excess solid is in contact with a [2]
saturated solution.
Outline how the solubility of magnesium hydroxide will vary with pH.
(ii) Suggest why magnesium is harder than sodium.
(iii) Outline why alloys are generally less malleable than their component metals.
g. (i) Draw a labelled diagram of a suitable apparatus for the electrolysis. [7]
(ii) State equations for the reactions that take place at the electrodes.
(iii) When dilute aqueous magnesium chloride is used as the electrolyte, the reactions at both electrodes are different. State equations for the
reactions that occur in aqueous solution.
(iv) Outline why magnesium metal is not produced in the electrolysis of aqueous magnesium chloride.
Markscheme
a. minimum energy required to remove one electron / energy required to remove most loosely bound/outermost electron;
(second) electron/electron (being lost from ) not subject to e-e repulsion from others in same level;
Do not accept “less electrons to share the charge” or answers employing this concept.
c. ;
Final mark involves correct computation of equation the student has produced.
Award [2] for –12 (bond enthalpy of Cl not halved) or +134 (signs wrong).
Award [1] for +12 (bond enthalpy of Cl not halved and signs wrong).
d. – – ;
higher pH / will shift the equilibrium to the left / lower pH / will (react with and) shift the equilibrium to the right;
Accept “Mg has more valence electrons than Na” / “Mg is Mg2+ but Na is only Na+”.
(iii) layers of ions/atoms/particles cannot slide over each other so easily (as different sized ions/atoms/particles) / OWTTE;
g.
(i)
Diagram:
Labelling:
anode/positive electrode, cathode/negative electrode, molten magnesium chloride/MgCl2 (l)/electrolyte correctly labelled;
Accept .
If both correct equations are given for the wrong electrodes award [1 max].
(iii) Negative electrode (cathode):
Accept /
.
Accept .
If both correct equations are given for the wrong electrodes award [1 max].
(iv) water/hydrogen ions more easily reduced/better oxidizing agents/have a more positive (than magnesium ions);
Examiners report
a. This was the most popular of the Section B questions, which was surprising because it was often not well answered. Most students were aware of
the change involved in ionization, some realised this relates to the most easily lost electron, some that it refers to gas phase changes and a few
both. Explanations of the changes in the values of successive ionization energies in terms of the attraction of the nucleus and the repulsion from
other electrons were generally weak, however candidates quite often recognised that the third electron lost had to come from a more stable
electron energy level. Very few were able to correctly sum the enthalpy terms involved in the Born-Haber cycle, in addition candidates rarely halved
the bond enthalpy of chlorine and a significant number appeared not to realise the question referred to MgCl rather than . There were some
G2 comments that space should have been left for students to draw a cycle, but this would have implied that such a drawing was required, hence
it is better to train students to use additional paper for any background support they may require. Quite a lot of students correctly deduced the
order of lattice enthalpy of the group (II) halides, and a number correctly explained this in terms of ionic radii, though many incorrectly invoked
electronegativities. Many students could correctly explain the effect of pH on the solubility of , though a significant number attempted to
answer the opposite question; how pH would depend on the concentration of dissolved ! It was surprising how few students could
correctly describe metallic bonding, how it is affected by the number of delocalized electrons per cation and the way it leads to malleability. Alloys
are not specifically mentioned in the syllabus but the mark scheme gave credit for answers that indicated the student was aware that malleability is
associated with layers of metal atoms/cations sliding over each other. Most students were able to draw appropriately labelled diagrams of
electrolysis apparatus, though sometimes the labelling of the polarity of the electrodes did not correspond to the polarity of the battery symbol
drawn. Quite a few candidates could quote equations for the reactions occurring the electrodes in both the liquid and aqueous state; both seemed
to be equally well answered which was perhaps a little surprisingly. Many could also give good explanations as to why electrolysis of the aqueous
solution did not produce magnesium metal, though confusions in terminology (such as hydrogen rather than hydrogen ions being reduced) were
not uncommon.
b. This was the most popular of the Section B questions, which was surprising because it was often not well answered. Most students were aware of
the change involved in ionization, some realised this relates to the most easily lost electron, some that it refers to gas phase changes and a few
both. Explanations of the changes in the values of successive ionization energies in terms of the attraction of the nucleus and the repulsion from
other electrons were generally weak, however candidates quite often recognised that the third electron lost had to come from a more stable
electron energy level. Very few were able to correctly sum the enthalpy terms involved in the Born-Haber cycle, in addition candidates rarely halved
the bond enthalpy of chlorine and a significant number appeared not to realise the question referred to MgCl rather than . There were some
G2 comments that space should have been left for students to draw a cycle, but this would have implied that such a drawing was required, hence
it is better to train students to use additional paper for any background support they may require. Quite a lot of students correctly deduced the
order of lattice enthalpy of the group (II) halides, and a number correctly explained this in terms of ionic radii, though many incorrectly invoked
electronegativities. Many students could correctly explain the effect of pH on the solubility of , though a significant number attempted to
answer the opposite question; how pH would depend on the concentration of dissolved ! It was surprising how few students could
correctly describe metallic bonding, how it is affected by the number of delocalized electrons per cation and the way it leads to malleability. Alloys
are not specifically mentioned in the syllabus but the mark scheme gave credit for answers that indicated the student was aware that malleability is
associated with layers of metal atoms/cations sliding over each other. Most students were able to draw appropriately labelled diagrams of
electrolysis apparatus, though sometimes the labelling of the polarity of the electrodes did not correspond to the polarity of the battery symbol
drawn. Quite a few candidates could quote equations for the reactions occurring the electrodes in both the liquid and aqueous state; both seemed
to be equally well answered which was perhaps a little surprisingly. Many could also give good explanations as to why electrolysis of the aqueous
solution did not produce magnesium metal, though confusions in terminology (such as hydrogen rather than hydrogen ions being reduced) were
not uncommon.
c. This was the most popular of the Section B questions, which was surprising because it was often not well answered. Most students were aware of
the change involved in ionization, some realised this relates to the most easily lost electron, some that it refers to gas phase changes and a few
both. Explanations of the changes in the values of successive ionization energies in terms of the attraction of the nucleus and the repulsion from
other electrons were generally weak, however candidates quite often recognised that the third electron lost had to come from a more stable
electron energy level. Very few were able to correctly sum the enthalpy terms involved in the Born-Haber cycle, in addition candidates rarely halved
the bond enthalpy of chlorine and a significant number appeared not to realise the question referred to MgCl rather than . There were some
G2 comments that space should have been left for students to draw a cycle, but this would have implied that such a drawing was required, hence
it is better to train students to use additional paper for any background support they may require. Quite a lot of students correctly deduced the
order of lattice enthalpy of the group (II) halides, and a number correctly explained this in terms of ionic radii, though many incorrectly invoked
electronegativities. Many students could correctly explain the effect of pH on the solubility of , though a significant number attempted to
answer the opposite question; how pH would depend on the concentration of dissolved ! It was surprising how few students could
correctly describe metallic bonding, how it is affected by the number of delocalized electrons per cation and the way it leads to malleability. Alloys
are not specifically mentioned in the syllabus but the mark scheme gave credit for answers that indicated the student was aware that malleability is
associated with layers of metal atoms/cations sliding over each other. Most students were able to draw appropriately labelled diagrams of
electrolysis apparatus, though sometimes the labelling of the polarity of the electrodes did not correspond to the polarity of the battery symbol
drawn. Quite a few candidates could quote equations for the reactions occurring the electrodes in both the liquid and aqueous state; both seemed
to be equally well answered which was perhaps a little surprisingly. Many could also give good explanations as to why electrolysis of the aqueous
solution did not produce magnesium metal, though confusions in terminology (such as hydrogen rather than hydrogen ions being reduced) were
not uncommon.
d. This was the most popular of the Section B questions, which was surprising because it was often not well answered. Most students were aware of
the change involved in ionization, some realised this relates to the most easily lost electron, some that it refers to gas phase changes and a few
both. Explanations of the changes in the values of successive ionization energies in terms of the attraction of the nucleus and the repulsion from
other electrons were generally weak, however candidates quite often recognised that the third electron lost had to come from a more stable
electron energy level. Very few were able to correctly sum the enthalpy terms involved in the Born-Haber cycle, in addition candidates rarely halved
the bond enthalpy of chlorine and a significant number appeared not to realise the question referred to MgCl rather than . There were some
G2 comments that space should have been left for students to draw a cycle, but this would have implied that such a drawing was required, hence
it is better to train students to use additional paper for any background support they may require. Quite a lot of students correctly deduced the
order of lattice enthalpy of the group (II) halides, and a number correctly explained this in terms of ionic radii, though many incorrectly invoked
electronegativities. Many students could correctly explain the effect of pH on the solubility of , though a significant number attempted to
answer the opposite question; how pH would depend on the concentration of dissolved ! It was surprising how few students could
correctly describe metallic bonding, how it is affected by the number of delocalized electrons per cation and the way it leads to malleability. Alloys
are not specifically mentioned in the syllabus but the mark scheme gave credit for answers that indicated the student was aware that malleability is
associated with layers of metal atoms/cations sliding over each other. Most students were able to draw appropriately labelled diagrams of
electrolysis apparatus, though sometimes the labelling of the polarity of the electrodes did not correspond to the polarity of the battery symbol
drawn. Quite a few candidates could quote equations for the reactions occurring the electrodes in both the liquid and aqueous state; both seemed
to be equally well answered which was perhaps a little surprisingly. Many could also give good explanations as to why electrolysis of the aqueous
solution did not produce magnesium metal, though confusions in terminology (such as hydrogen rather than hydrogen ions being reduced) were
not uncommon.
e. This was the most popular of the Section B questions, which was surprising because it was often not well answered. Most students were aware of
the change involved in ionization, some realised this relates to the most easily lost electron, some that it refers to gas phase changes and a few
both. Explanations of the changes in the values of successive ionization energies in terms of the attraction of the nucleus and the repulsion from
other electrons were generally weak, however candidates quite often recognised that the third electron lost had to come from a more stable
electron energy level. Very few were able to correctly sum the enthalpy terms involved in the Born-Haber cycle, in addition candidates rarely halved
the bond enthalpy of chlorine and a significant number appeared not to realise the question referred to MgCl rather than . There were some
G2 comments that space should have been left for students to draw a cycle, but this would have implied that such a drawing was required, hence
it is better to train students to use additional paper for any background support they may require. Quite a lot of students correctly deduced the
order of lattice enthalpy of the group (II) halides, and a number correctly explained this in terms of ionic radii, though many incorrectly invoked
electronegativities. Many students could correctly explain the effect of pH on the solubility of , though a significant number attempted to
answer the opposite question; how pH would depend on the concentration of dissolved ! It was surprising how few students could
correctly describe metallic bonding, how it is affected by the number of delocalized electrons per cation and the way it leads to malleability. Alloys
are not specifically mentioned in the syllabus but the mark scheme gave credit for answers that indicated the student was aware that malleability is
associated with layers of metal atoms/cations sliding over each other. Most students were able to draw appropriately labelled diagrams of
electrolysis apparatus, though sometimes the labelling of the polarity of the electrodes did not correspond to the polarity of the battery symbol
drawn. Quite a few candidates could quote equations for the reactions occurring the electrodes in both the liquid and aqueous state; both seemed
to be equally well answered which was perhaps a little surprisingly. Many could also give good explanations as to why electrolysis of the aqueous
solution did not produce magnesium metal, though confusions in terminology (such as hydrogen rather than hydrogen ions being reduced) were
not uncommon.
f. This was the most popular of the Section B questions, which was surprising because it was often not well answered. Most students were aware of
the change involved in ionization, some realised this relates to the most easily lost electron, some that it refers to gas phase changes and a few
both. Explanations of the changes in the values of successive ionization energies in terms of the attraction of the nucleus and the repulsion from
other electrons were generally weak, however candidates quite often recognised that the third electron lost had to come from a more stable
electron energy level. Very few were able to correctly sum the enthalpy terms involved in the Born-Haber cycle, in addition candidates rarely halved
the bond enthalpy of chlorine and a significant number appeared not to realise the question referred to MgCl rather than . There were some
G2 comments that space should have been left for students to draw a cycle, but this would have implied that such a drawing was required, hence
it is better to train students to use additional paper for any background support they may require. Quite a lot of students correctly deduced the
order of lattice enthalpy of the group (II) halides, and a number correctly explained this in terms of ionic radii, though many incorrectly invoked
electronegativities. Many students could correctly explain the effect of pH on the solubility of , though a significant number attempted to
answer the opposite question; how pH would depend on the concentration of dissolved ! It was surprising how few students could
correctly describe metallic bonding, how it is affected by the number of delocalized electrons per cation and the way it leads to malleability. Alloys
are not specifically mentioned in the syllabus but the mark scheme gave credit for answers that indicated the student was aware that malleability is
associated with layers of metal atoms/cations sliding over each other. Most students were able to draw appropriately labelled diagrams of
electrolysis apparatus, though sometimes the labelling of the polarity of the electrodes did not correspond to the polarity of the battery symbol
drawn. Quite a few candidates could quote equations for the reactions occurring the electrodes in both the liquid and aqueous state; both seemed
to be equally well answered which was perhaps a little surprisingly. Many could also give good explanations as to why electrolysis of the aqueous
solution did not produce magnesium metal, though confusions in terminology (such as hydrogen rather than hydrogen ions being reduced) were
not uncommon.
g. This was the most popular of the Section B questions, which was surprising because it was often not well answered. Most students were aware of
the change involved in ionization, some realised this relates to the most easily lost electron, some that it refers to gas phase changes and a few
both. Explanations of the changes in the values of successive ionization energies in terms of the attraction of the nucleus and the repulsion from
other electrons were generally weak, however candidates quite often recognised that the third electron lost had to come from a more stable
electron energy level. Very few were able to correctly sum the enthalpy terms involved in the Born-Haber cycle, in addition candidates rarely halved
the bond enthalpy of chlorine and a significant number appeared not to realise the question referred to MgCl rather than . There were some
G2 comments that space should have been left for students to draw a cycle, but this would have implied that such a drawing was required, hence
it is better to train students to use additional paper for any background support they may require. Quite a lot of students correctly deduced the
order of lattice enthalpy of the group (II) halides, and a number correctly explained this in terms of ionic radii, though many incorrectly invoked
electronegativities. Many students could correctly explain the effect of pH on the solubility of , though a significant number attempted to
answer the opposite question; how pH would depend on the concentration of dissolved ! It was surprising how few students could
correctly describe metallic bonding, how it is affected by the number of delocalized electrons per cation and the way it leads to malleability. Alloys
are not specifically mentioned in the syllabus but the mark scheme gave credit for answers that indicated the student was aware that malleability is
associated with layers of metal atoms/cations sliding over each other. Most students were able to draw appropriately labelled diagrams of
electrolysis apparatus, though sometimes the labelling of the polarity of the electrodes did not correspond to the polarity of the battery symbol
drawn. Quite a few candidates could quote equations for the reactions occurring the electrodes in both the liquid and aqueous state; both seemed
to be equally well answered which was perhaps a little surprisingly. Many could also give good explanations as to why electrolysis of the aqueous
solution did not produce magnesium metal, though confusions in terminology (such as hydrogen rather than hydrogen ions being reduced) were
not uncommon.
An equilibrium exists between nitrosyl chloride, NOCl, nitrogen oxide, NO, and chlorine, .
of hexane, , and of pentan-1-ol, , were placed separately into two closed containers at 298 K and allowed to
reach equilibrium.
a. (i) Deduce the equilibrium constant expression for this reaction. [7]
(ii) Explain the effect on the position of equilibrium and the value of when pressure is decreased and temperature is kept constant.
(iii) 2.00 mol of NOCl was placed in a container and allowed to reach equilibrium at 298 K. At equilibrium, 0.200 mol of NO was
present. Determine the equilibrium concentrations of NOCl and , and hence calculate the value of at this temperature.
(iv) The value of is at 318 K. State and explain whether the forward reaction is exothermic or endothermic.
b. (i) Compare the two liquids in terms of their boiling points, enthalpies of vaporization and vapour pressures. [4]
c.i. Calculate the pH of a solution of ammonia at 298 K to two decimal places, using Table 15 of the Data Booklet. [2]
c.ii.A buffer solution is made using of hydrochloric acid, HCl (aq), and of ammonia solution, [2]
c.iv.A solution of ammonia is added to of a hydrochloric acid solution in a titration experiment. [1]
c.v.Calculate the pH of the solution at the equivalence point, using Table 15 of the Data Booklet. [4]
c.vi.Identify a suitable indicator for this titration, using Table 16 of the Data Booklet. [1]
Markscheme
a. (i) ;
(ii) equilibrium shifts to right as there are more moles (of gas) on product side;
(iii) ;
b. (i) hexane has lower boiling point and enthalpy of vaporization than pentan-1-ol / OWTTE;
(ii) hexane is non-polar / has only van der Waals’/London/dispersion forces / has weaker intermolecular forces than pentan-1-ol;
c.i. ;
;
Award [2] for correct final answer.
c.iii. ;
OR
c.iv.
Examiners report
a. The construction and use of equilibrium expressions for showed good understanding. The prediction of the effect of increasing pressure on the
position of equilibria by applying Le Chatelier’s principle was good, but the fact that remains constant at fixed temperatures was less well
known.
pH calculations in c(i), c(ii) and c(v) tended to be very good or completely incorrect.
b. The construction and use of equilibrium expressions for showed good understanding. The prediction of the effect of increasing pressure on the
position of equilibria by applying Le Chatelier’s principle was good, but the fact that remains constant at fixed temperatures was less well
known.
pH calculations in c(i), c(ii) and c(v) tended to be very good or completely incorrect.
c.i. The construction and use of equilibrium expressions for showed good understanding. The prediction of the effect of increasing pressure on the
position of equilibria by applying Le Chatelier’s principle was good, but the fact that remains constant at fixed temperatures was less well
known.
pH calculations in c(i), c(ii) and c(v) tended to be very good or completely incorrect.
c.ii.The construction and use of equilibrium expressions for showed good understanding. The prediction of the effect of increasing pressure on the
position of equilibria by applying Le Chatelier’s principle was good, but the fact that remains constant at fixed temperatures was less well
known.
pH calculations in c(i), c(ii) and c(v) tended to be very good or completely incorrect.
c.iii.The construction and use of equilibrium expressions for showed good understanding. The prediction of the effect of increasing pressure on the
position of equilibria by applying Le Chatelier’s principle was good, but the fact that remains constant at fixed temperatures was less well
known.
pH calculations in c(i), c(ii) and c(v) tended to be very good or completely incorrect.
c.iv.The construction and use of equilibrium expressions for showed good understanding. The prediction of the effect of increasing pressure on the
position of equilibria by applying Le Chatelier’s principle was good, but the fact that remains constant at fixed temperatures was less well
known.
pH calculations in c(i), c(ii) and c(v) tended to be very good or completely incorrect.
c.v.The construction and use of equilibrium expressions for showed good understanding. The prediction of the effect of increasing pressure on the
position of equilibria by applying Le Chatelier’s principle was good, but the fact that remains constant at fixed temperatures was less well
known.
pH calculations in c(i), c(ii) and c(v) tended to be very good or completely incorrect.
c.vi.The construction and use of equilibrium expressions for showed good understanding. The prediction of the effect of increasing pressure on the
position of equilibria by applying Le Chatelier’s principle was good, but the fact that remains constant at fixed temperatures was less well
known.
pH calculations in c(i), c(ii) and c(v) tended to be very good or completely incorrect.
Draw the Lewis structures, state the shape and predict the bond angles for the following species.
a.i. [3]
a.ii. [3]
a.iii. [3]
b.i. State the names for the enthalpy changes c and d. [2]
b.ii.Deduce which two of the enthalpy changes a to e have negative signs. [1]
b.iii.Determine the value for the enthalpy of formation of potassium bromide. [2]
b.iv.Explain why the quantitative value for the lattice enthalpy of calcium bromide is larger than the value for the lattice enthalpy of potassium [2]
bromide.
c.i. Compare the formation of a sigma and a pi bond between two carbon atoms in a molecule. [2]
c.ii.Identify how many sigma and pi bonds are present in propene, . [2]
c.iv.Explain how the concept of hybridization can be used to explain the bonding in the triple bond present in propyne. [3]
Markscheme
a.i.
;
trigonal pyramid;
a.ii.
;
bent/V–shaped;
in the range of 100–106°;
a.iii.
;
square planar;
90°;
d: electron affinity;
b.ii.d and e;
b.iii. ;
b.iv. is smaller than and has more charge than / has a greater charge density;
c.i. sigma bonds are formed by end on/axial overlap of orbitals with electron density between the two atoms/nuclei;
pi bonds are formed by sideways overlap of parallel p orbitals with electron density above and below internuclear axis/ bond;
c.ii.8 sigma/ ;
1 pi/ ;
c.iii.109°/109.5°;
120°;
c.iv.sp hybridization;
sigma bond formed by overlap between the two sp hybrid orbitals (on each of the two carbon atoms) / pi bonds formed by overlap between
remaining p orbitals (on each of the two carbon atoms) / diagram showing 2 sp hybrid orbitals and 2 p orbitals;
Examiners report
a.i. This question was the most popular of the Section B questions. Part (a) was generally well answered with many candidates drawing clear Lewis
structures and applying their knowledge of VSEPR theory well. Common errors included the omission of lone electron pairs on outer atoms, and
the omission of a bracket and charge on the ion. Incorrect angular values were common. Some candidates described shapes and bond angles in
terms of the ‘parent shape’. Good candidates explained the answers well and scored full marks. Weaker candidates simply wrote two answers; for
structures and applying their knowledge of VSEPR theory well. Common errors included the omission of lone electron pairs on outer atoms, and
the omission of a bracket and charge on the ion. Incorrect angular values were common. Some candidates described shapes and bond angles in
terms of the ‘parent shape’. Good candidates explained the answers well and scored full marks. Weaker candidates simply wrote two answers; for
a.iii.This question was the most popular of the Section B questions. Part (a) was generally well answered with many candidates drawing clear Lewis
structures and applying their knowledge of VSEPR theory well. Common errors included the omission of lone electron pairs on outer atoms, and
the omission of a bracket and charge on the ion. Incorrect angular values were common. Some candidates described shapes and bond angles in
terms of the ‘parent shape’. Good candidates explained the answers well and scored full marks. Weaker candidates simply wrote two answers; for
b.i. In part (b) many candidates incorrectly identified the process converting liquid bromine molecules to gaseous bromine atoms as vaporization.
b.ii.Deducing the enthalpy changes with negative signs proved challenging for many although, with follow through marks credit was earned for the
b.iii.Some teachers commented on the G2 forms that the energy cycle diagram was strange, however, the stages of the Born-Haber cycle were clearly
b.iv.Very few candidates could explain why calcium bromide has a larger lattice enthalpy than potassium bromide. Many referred to atoms instead of
ions, and tried to answer this in terms of the electronegativity of the metals.
c.i. Part (c) was answered well by some candidates who produced clear and well annotated diagrams as part of their answers. Many candidates
however omitted mention of orbitals when trying to describe the formation of sigma and pi bonds or to explain hybridization. There were many
c.ii.Part (c) was answered well by some candidates who produced clear and well annotated diagrams as part of their answers. Many candidates
however omitted mention of orbitals when trying to describe the formation of sigma and pi bonds or to explain hybridization. There were many
c.iii.Part (c) was answered well by some candidates who produced clear and well annotated diagrams as part of their answers. Many candidates
however omitted mention of orbitals when trying to describe the formation of sigma and pi bonds or to explain hybridization. There were many
c.iv.Part (c) was answered well by some candidates who produced clear and well annotated diagrams as part of their answers. Many candidates
however omitted mention of orbitals when trying to describe the formation of sigma and pi bonds or to explain hybridization. There were many
The half-equations involved for the first step of rusting are given below.
Half-equation 1:
Half-equation 2:
a. (i) Identify whether half-equation 1 represents oxidation or reduction, giving a reason for your answer. [5]
(ii) Identify the oxidation number of each atom in the three species in half-equation 2.
(iii) Deduce the overall redox equation for the first step of rusting by combining half-equations 1 and 2.
(iv) Identify the reducing agent in the redox equation in part (iii).
b. The oxygen in half-equation 2 is atmospheric oxygen that is found dissolved in water in very small concentrations. Explain, in terms of [2]
c. State the relationship between the electron arrangement of an element and its group and period in the periodic table. [2]
d. Transition metals and their compounds often catalyse reactions. The catalyzed decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by CuO is an example. [2]
State two other examples of catalyzed reactions giving the transition metal or its compound acting as catalyst.
e. (i) State a chemical equation for the partial dissociation of water into ions, including state symbols. [6]
(ii) The dissociation of water into ions is reversible. State the expression for the ionic product constant of water.
(iii) The ionic product constant of water was measured at three different temperatures.
Deduce whether the ionization of water is exothermic or endothermic, giving your reason.
(iv) Use the data in part (iii) to determine the pH of water at 373 K, correct to two decimal places.
f. (i) An aqueous solution of sodium chloride is electrolysed using inert electrodes. Explain which product is obtained at the positive electrode [5]
(ii) State the half-equations occurring at the electrodes during the electrolysis of the concentrated aqueous solution of sodium chloride.
g. Describe how electrolysis can be used to electroplate a bracelet with a layer of silver metal. Include the choice of electrodes and electrolyte [3]
Markscheme
a. (i) oxidation and (iron/Fe) loses electrons/increases in oxidation number/state;
(ii) ;
Accept use of oxidation states (0, +1, –2, –2, +1) for oxidation numbers.
(iii) ;
(iv) Fe/iron;
b. needs to break strong hydrogen bonds/H–bonds between water molecules (to dissolve) / oxygen cannot form hydrogen bonds/H–bonds with
water;
oxygen can only form (weak) van der Waals’/vdW/LDF/London/dispersion forces with water;
c. groups indicate the number of electrons in the highest energy level/outer/valence shell;
periods indicate the number of (occupied) energy levels/shells (in the atom);
Ni/Pd/Pt catalyses hydrogenation / manufacture of margarine / addition of hydrogen to C=C / conversion of alkenes to alkanes;
Pd/Pt is a catalyst in catalytic converters / Pd/Pt catalyzes reaction of and CO/ and (unburnt) fuel/exhaust gases;
(ii) ;
(iii) at higher temperatures ionization increases / at higher temperatures equilibrium shifts to right;
ionization is endothermic;
(iv) ;
according to electrochemical series/ values/ease of oxidation / reacts/oxygen is released / OWTTE / at low chloride concentration
/ reacts/oxygen is released;
Award [1] if half-equations are correct but placed at the wrong electrodes.
Accept Pt anode.
Examiners report
a. (i) Very well answered.
(ii) Most candidates answered correctly. The most common mistakes were doubling the oxidation number of H in , and entering a wrong
oxidation number for elemental oxygen.
b. The aqueous solubility of oxygen gas was often poorly explained, with the discussion focussing on the intermolecular forces found in each
d. The majority of candidates were able to give two valid examples of transition metals or their compounds acting as catalysts.
e. (i) Very well answered.
(iii) About half of the candidates were able to gain full marks. Some candidates found difficulty in connecting the increase in to the position
of equilibrium.
(iv) About half of the candidates were able to calculate the pH from the value.
f. (i) Many candidates identified chlorine as the product, but the other two marks were more discriminating. Some candidates clarified that
was oxidized in preference to OH- because of its high concentration, but very few related the situation to the electrochemical series.
(ii) This was poorly answered by many candidates. Common mistakes included releasing sodium at the cathode, reversing electrodes and
unbalanced redox half-reactions where the electrons were sometimes on the wrong side of the equation.
g. Very well answered. Most candidates determined both electrodes correctly. The main difficulty for some candidates was choosing a suitable
electrolyte.
EUK-134, the structure of which is shown below, is a complex ion of manganese(III) that is used in expensive sun-protection products because of its
b. State the name given to species that bond to a central metal ion, and identify the type of bond present. [2]
Name given:
Type of bond:
c. Transition metals have certain characteristic properties. State two properties that are involved in EUK-134 rapidly decreasing the concentration [2]
of oxidizing agents.
d. Substances like EUK-134 are often coloured. Explain why compounds of transition metals absorb visible radiation. [3]
Markscheme
a. / ;
b. ligand;
dative/coordinate (covalent);
catalytic properties;
Examiners report
a. Very few candidates could interpret the electron structure of manganese from its oxidation state, though the term “ligand” and the nature of its
bond to metal ions were almost universally known. The general properties of transition metals seemed to have been well memorized, even though
they were not always correctly applied. The splitting of the d sub-shell was generally known, though a worrying number of students believe that
b. Very few candidates could interpret the electron structure of manganese from its oxidation state, though the term “ligand” and the nature of its
bond to metal ions were almost universally known. The general properties of transition metals seemed to have been well memorized, even though
they were not always correctly applied. The splitting of the d sub-shell was generally known, though a worrying number of students believe that
c. Very few candidates could interpret the electron structure of manganese from its oxidation state, though the term “ligand” and the nature of its
bond to metal ions were almost universally known. The general properties of transition metals seemed to have been well memorized, even though
they were not always correctly applied. The splitting of the d sub-shell was generally known, though a worrying number of students believe that
d. Very few candidates could interpret the electron structure of manganese from its oxidation state, though the term “ligand” and the nature of its
bond to metal ions were almost universally known. The general properties of transition metals seemed to have been well memorized, even though
they were not always correctly applied. The splitting of the d sub-shell was generally known, though a worrying number of students believe that
But-2-ene is a straight-chain alkene with formula . The molecule contains both and bonds.
The polymerization of the alkenes is one of the most significant reactions of the twentieth century.
(ii) For each of the carbon atoms, C(1) and C(2), identify the type of hybridization shown.
C(1):
C(2):
b. But-2-ene shows geometrical isomerism. Draw the structural formula and state the name of the other geometrical isomer. [2]
c. Identify the structural formula of an isomer of but-2-ene which does not decolourize bromine water, Br2(aq). [1]
d. (i) Outline two reasons why the polymers of the alkenes are of economic importance. [6]
(ii) State the type of polymerization reaction shown by the alkene in part (a).
(iii) Deduce the structure of the resulting polymer showing three repeating units.
(iv) Explain why monomers are often gases or volatile liquids, but polymers are solids.
Markscheme
a. (i) (bond formed by) sideways overlap;
(of) p orbitals;
b.
;
cis but-2-ene/Z-but-2-ene;
c.
;
cheap;
large industry;
(ii) addition;
(iii) ;
(iv) monomers are smaller molecules / have smaller surface area than polymers;
Examiners report
a. This question was generally well answered and many high scores were seen. Most candidates were able to explain the formation of bonds in (a)
b. Many candidates drew structures which were not geometric isomers in (b) with but-1-ene a common incorrect answer.
c. In (c) only the best candidates were able to identify a cycloalkane as a saturated isomer and it was fairly common to find structures that included
d. The economic importance of addition polymers was well known in (d) with most candidates stating that they were plastics with versatile properties
Addition polymerisation was well recalled but a large number of candidates made mistakes with the structure of the polymer. Continuation bonds,
for example, were often missing from the ends. Many understood in terms of molecular size, why polymers have higher boiling points than
monomers but not all correctly attributed it to the stronger van der Waals forces between the molecules.
A voltaic cell is constructed as follows. One half-cell contains a chromium electrode immersed in a solution containing ions. The other half-
cell contains a copper electrode immersed in a solution containing ions. The two electrodes are connected to a voltmeter and the two
b.ii.Describe the ionic bonding present in and how the ions are formed. [2]
Describe the nature of the ligand-chromium ion bonds in terms of acid-base theory.
d.i. The dichromate ion, , and the iodide ion, , react together in the presence of an acid to form and ions. [2]
Deduce the half-equation for the reaction of to and the overall equation for this reaction.
Half-equation:
Overall equation:
d.ii.Explain in terms of oxidation numbers whether iodine is oxidized or reduced in part (d) (i). [1]
e.iii.Predict the balanced equation for the spontaneous reaction which will produce a current in this voltaic cell. [1]
e.iv.Identify the negative and the positive electrodes in this cell. [1]
e.vi.State the directions in which the negative ions (anions) and the positive ions (cations) flow in the salt bridge. [1]
Markscheme
a.i.
Accept full-arrows.
Do not award the mark if sub-levels are incorrectly labelled or if no boxes are drawn.
a.ii.(electrostatic) attraction between (lattice of) cations/positive/ ions and delocalized electrons;
a.iii.(delocalized electrons allows) the layers/rows of cations/positive/ ions to slide past each other (without disrupting the metallic bonding);
b.ii.(electrostatic) attraction between positive and negative ions/oppositely charged ions/ and ;
formed as a result of electron transfer from chromium atoms to oxygen atoms / OWTTE;
b.iii.ions are not free to move (when solid) / ions in rigid lattice / OWTTE;
energy difference is in visible part of spectrum / electrons absorb visible light/one colour/frequency/wavelength;
electron transitions occur from lower to higher energy level (within d sub-level);
;
Accept e instead of .
Overall equation:
e.i. potential (of reduction half-reaction) under standard conditions measured relative to standard hydrogen electrode/SHE / OWTTE;
Accept “solute concentration of 1 ” or “1 bar/1 atm (pressure) for gases” instead of “standard conditions”.
e.ii. ;
e.iii. ;
Accept “from negative electrode/anode to positive electrode/cathode” if electrodes correctly identified in (iv).
e.vi.negative ions/anions towards the chromium(III) solution and positive ions/cations towards the copper(II) solution / OWTTE;
Examiners report
a.i. Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
a.ii.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
a.iii.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
b.i. Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
b.ii.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
b.iii.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
c.i. Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
c.ii.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
c.iii.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
c.iv.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
d.i. Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
d.ii.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
e.i. Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
e.ii.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
e.iii.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
e.iv.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
e.v.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
e.vi.Most candidates were able to draw an arrow in the box diagram for the electron configuration of chromium, but few gave a complete description of
the nature of metallic bonding and did not refer to the attraction between the cations and the delocalized electrons. Candidates were more
successful in explaining malleability in terms of cations sliding over one another. Most candidates were able to use oxidation numbers in
naming but the explanation of ionic bonding was incomplete with only limited reference to the electrostatic attraction between the
oppositely charged ions. Students continue to struggle to understand that conductivity of molten ionic compounds is due to mobile ions not
electrons. Most candidates were able to deduce the oxidation number in the complex ion and give the answer using the correct notation. The
nature of the ligand-chromium bond was well known and the explanation of the colour of transition metal complexes was stronger than in previous
sessions with only a minority referring to the emission of light. Some teachers have commented that trans/cis-isomers of the complex ions is not
specifically stated in the guide but many students were able draw two possible isomers. The representation of 3D structures could have been
clearer although this was not explicitly penalized. Redox half-reactions continue to challenge many with only the stronger students being able to
gain both marks and deduce the correct overall equation. Some teachers commented that the question was too demanding as students had to
construct two half-equations in order to get to the overall redox equation, but the half-reaction is given in table 14 of the current
data booklet. The majority of candidates identified the conversion of to as oxidation and many able to identify the increase in oxidation
number. The workings of a voltaic cell was generally well understood but the definition of the term standard electrode potential was often
incomplete with the reference to standard conditions of the hydrogen electrode often missing.
b. Describe how the relative atomic mass of a sample of calcium could be determined from its mass spectrum. [2]
c. When calcium compounds are introduced into a gas flame a red colour is seen; sodium compounds give a yellow flame. Outline the source of [2]
d.i. Suggest two reasons why solid calcium has a greater density than solid potassium. [2]
f. Calcium carbide reacts with water to form ethyne and calcium hydroxide. [1]
g.i. Describe how sigma (σ) and pi ( ) bonds are formed. [2]
Markscheme
a. electrostatic attraction AND oppositely charged ions
[1 mark]
OR
OR
Award [1 max] for stating “m/z values of isotopes AND relative abundance/intensity” but not stating these need to be multiplied.
[2 marks]
[2 marks]
OR
[2 marks]
d.ii.delocalized/mobile electrons «free to move»
[1 mark]
e.
general increase
[2 marks]
f. pH > 7
Accept any specific pH value or range of values above 7 and below 14.
[1 mark]
OR
pi ( ):
OR
[2 marks]
g.ii.sigma (σ): 3
AND
pi ( ): 2
[1 mark]
Examiners report
a. [N/A]
[N/A]
b.
[N/A]
c.
d.i. [N/A]
[N/A]
d.ii.
[N/A]
e.
f. [N/A]
[N/A]
g.i.
[N/A]
g.ii.
Urea can also be made by the direct combination of ammonia and carbon dioxide gases.
a.i. Calculate the percentage by mass of nitrogen in urea to two decimal places using section 6 of the data booklet. [2]
a.ii.Suggest how the percentage of nitrogen affects the cost of transport of fertilizers giving a reason. [1]
Predict the electron domain and molecular geometries at the nitrogen and carbon atoms, applying the VSEPR theory.
c. Urea can be made by reacting potassium cyanate, KNCO, with ammonium chloride, NH4Cl. [2]
Determine the maximum mass of urea that could be formed from 50.0 cm3 of 0.100 mol dm−3 potassium cyanate solution.
d.ii.Predict, with a reason, the effect on the equilibrium constant, Kc, when the temperature is increased. [1]
d.iii.Determine an approximate order of magnitude for Kc, using sections 1 and 2 of the data booklet. Assume ΔGΘ for the forward reaction is [2]
e.i. Suggest one reason why urea is a solid and ammonia a gas at room temperature. [1]
e.ii.Sketch two different hydrogen bonding interactions between ammonia and water. [2]
f. The combustion of urea produces water, carbon dioxide and nitrogen. [2]
g. Calculate the maximum volume of CO2, in cm3, produced at STP by the combustion of 0.600 g of urea, using sections 2 and 6 of the data [1]
booklet.
h. Describe the bond formation when urea acts as a ligand in a transition metal complex ion. [2]
i. The C–N bonds in urea are shorter than might be expected for a single C–N bond. Suggest, in terms of electrons, how this could occur. [1]
Identify the species responsible for the peaks at m/z = 60 and 44.
l.i. Predict the number of signals in the 1H NMR spectrum of urea. [1]
l.ii. Predict the splitting pattern of the 1H NMR spectrum of urea. [1]
l.iii.Outline why TMS (tetramethylsilane) may be added to the sample to carry out 1H NMR spectroscopy and why it is particularly suited to this role. [2]
Markscheme
a.i. molar mass of urea «4 1.01 + 2 14.01 + 12.01 + 16.00» = 60.07 «g mol-1»
[2 marks]
a.ii.«cost» increases AND lower N% «means higher cost of transportation per unit of nitrogen»
OR
[1 mark]
b.
Note: Urea’s structure is more complex than that predicted from VSEPR theory.
[3 marks]
[2 marks]
d.i.
[1 mark]
OR
OR
[1 mark]
d.iii.ln K « = » = –20
«Kc =» 2 10–9
OR
1.69 10–9
OR
10–9
[2 marks]
[1 mark]
e.ii.
If lone pairs are shown on N or O, then the lone pair on N or one of the lone pairs on O MUST be involved in the H-bond.
[2 marks]
[2 marks]
[1 mark]
co-ordinate/dative/covalent bonds
[2 marks]
i. lone pairs on nitrogen atoms can be donated to/shared with C–N bond
OR
OR
OR
slight positive charge on C due to C=O polarity reduces C–N bond length
[1 mark]
j. 60: CON2H4+
44: CONH2+
[2 marks]
[2 marks]
l.i. 1
[2 marks]
l.ii. singlet
[1 mark]
OR
OR
OR
[2 marks]
Examiners report
[N/A]
a.i.
a.ii.[N/A]
[N/A]
b.
[N/A]
c.
d.i. [N/A]
[N/A]
d.ii.
[N/A]
d.iii.
e.i. [N/A]
[N/A]
e.ii.
[N/A]
f.
g. [N/A]
[N/A]
h.
[N/A]
i.
j. [N/A]
[N/A]
k.
[N/A]
l.i.
[N/A]
[N/A]
l.iii.
l.ii.
b. Explain why the melting points of the group 1 metals (Li → Cs) decrease down the group whereas the melting points of the group 17 elements [3]
d.ii.Deduce the charge on the complex ion and the oxidation state of cobalt. [2]
e. Describe, in terms of acid-base theories, the type of reaction that takes place between the cobalt ion and water to form the complex ion. [2]
Markscheme
b. Any three of:
Group 1:
atomic/ionic radius increases
OR
Group 17:
number of electrons/surface area/molar mass increase
[Max 3 Marks]
OR
Examiners report
[N/A]
b.
[N/A]
d.i.
[N/A]
d.ii.
[N/A]
e.
Phosphine (IUPAC name phosphane) is a hydride of phosphorus, with the formula PH3.
(iii) Deduce, giving your reason, whether phosphine would act as a Lewis acid, a Lewis base, or neither.
(iv) Outline whether you expect the bonds in phosphine to be polar or non-polar, giving a brief reason.
(v) Phosphine has a much greater molar mass than ammonia. Explain why phosphine has a significantly lower boiling point than ammonia.
Weak:
Brønsted–Lowry base:
b. Phosphine is usually prepared by heating white phosphorus, one of the allotropes of phosphorus, with concentrated aqueous sodium [8]
(ii) The ion H2PO2− is amphiprotic. Outline what is meant by amphiprotic, giving the formulas of both species it is converted to when it behaves
in this manner.
P4:
H2PO2−:
(iv) Oxidation is now defined in terms of change of oxidation number. Explore how earlier definitions of oxidation and reduction may have led to
conflicting answers for the conversion of P4 to H2PO2− and the way in which the use of oxidation numbers has resolved this.
c. 2.478 g of white phosphorus was used to make phosphine according to the equation: [4]
(ii) This phosphorus was reacted with 100.0 cm3 of 5.00 mol dm−3 aqueous sodium hydroxide. Deduce, showing your working, which was the
limiting reagent.
(iv) Determine the volume of phosphine, measured in cm3 at standard temperature and pressure, that was produced.
d. Impurities cause phosphine to ignite spontaneously in air to form an oxide of phosphorus and water. [9]
(i) 200.0 g of air was heated by the energy from the complete combustion of 1.00 mol phosphine. Calculate the temperature rise using section 1
of the data booklet and the data below.
(ii) The oxide formed in the reaction with air contains 43.6% phosphorus by mass. Determine the empirical formula of the oxide, showing your
method.
(iii) The molar mass of the oxide is approximately 285 g mol−1. Determine the molecular formula of the oxide.
(iv) State the equation for the reaction of this oxide of phosphorus with water.
(v) Suggest why oxides of phosphorus are not major contributors to acid deposition.
(vi) The levels of sulfur dioxide, a major contributor to acid deposition, can be minimized by either pre-combustion and post-combustion
methods. Outline one technique of each method.
Pre-combustion:
Post-combustion:
Markscheme
a. (i)
Accept structures using dots and/or crosses to indicate bonds and/or lone pair.
(ii)
sp3
(iii)
Lewis base AND has a lone pair of electrons «to donate»
(iv)
non-polar AND P and H have the same electronegativity
Accept “polar” if there is a reference to a small difference in electronegativity and apply ECF in 1 a (v).
(v)
PH3 has London «dispersion» forces
NH3 forms H-bonds
H-bonds are stronger
OR
London forces are weaker
Accept van der Waals’ forces, dispersion forces and instantaneous dipole – induced dipole forces.
(vi)
Weak: only partially dissociated/ionized «in dilute aqueous solution»
Brønsted–Lowry base: an acceptor of protons/H+/hydrogen ions
b. (i)
OR
P4 represents «4P» atoms bonded together AND 4P represents «4» separate/non-bonded «P» atoms
(ii)
can act as both a «Brønsted–Lowry» acid and a «Brønsted–Lowry» base
OR
can accept and/or donate a hydrogen ion/proton/H+
HPO22– AND H3PO2
(iii)
P4: 0
H2PO2–: +1
(iv)
oxygen gained, so could be oxidation
hydrogen gained, so could be reduction
OR
negative charge «on product/H2PO2 »/gain of electrons, so could be reduction
oxidation number increases so must be oxidation
Award [1 max] for M1 and M2 if candidate displays knowledge of at least two of these definitions but does not apply them to the reaction.
c. (i)
« »= 0.02000 «mol»
(ii)
n(NaOH) = «0.1000 × 5.00 =» 0.500 «mol» AND P4/phosphorus is limiting reagent
(iii)
amount in excess «= 0.500 - (3 × 0.02000)» = 0.440 «mol»
(iv)
«22.7 × 1000 × 0.02000» = 454 «cm3»
Accept methods employing pV = nRT, with p as either 100 (454 cm3) or 101.3 kPa (448 cm3). Do not accept answers in dm3.
d. (i)
(ii)
n(P)«= »=1.41 «mol»
n(O) «= »=3.53 «mol»
(iii)
« =2.00, so molecular formula = 2×P2O5=»P4O10
(iv)
P4O10(s) + 6H2O (l) → 4H3PO4 (aq)
(v)
phosphorus not commonly found in fuels
OR
no common pathways for phosphorus oxides to enter the air
OR
amount of phosphorus-containing organic matter undergoing anaerobic decomposition is small
Accept “phosphorus oxides are solids so are not easily distributed in the atmosphere”.
Accept “low levels of phosphorus oxide in the air”.
Do not accept “H3PO4 is a weak acid”.
(vi)
Pre-combustion:
remove sulfur/S/sulfur containing compounds
Post-combustion:
remove it/SO2 by neutralization/reaction with alkali/base
Accept “lime injection fluidised bed combustion” for either, but not both.
Examiners report
[N/A]
a.
[N/A]
b.
[N/A]
c.
[N/A]
d.
a. Draw the Lewis (electron dot) structures of PF3 and PF5 and use the VSEPR theory to deduce the molecular geometry of each species including [6]
bond angles.
b. Predict whether the molecules PF3 and PF5 are polar or non-polar. [1]
c. State the type of hybridization shown by the phosphorus atom in PF3. [1]
Markscheme
a.
c. sp3
Examiners report
[N/A]
a.
b. [N/A]
[N/A]
c.
The reaction between hydrogen and nitrogen monoxide is thought to proceed by the mechanism shown below.
(iii) Explain how you would attempt to confirm this rate expression, giving the results you would expect.
(iv) State, giving your reason, whether confirmation of the rate expression would prove that the mechanism given is correct.
(v) Suggest how the rate of this reaction could be measured experimentally.
b. The enthalpy change for the reaction between nitrogen monoxide and hydrogen is −664 kJ and its activation energy is 63 kJ. [6]
(i) Sketch the potential energy profile for the overall reaction, using the axes given, indicating both the enthalpy of reaction and activation energy.
(ii) This reaction is normally carried out using a catalyst. Draw a dotted line labelled “Catalysed” on the diagram above to indicate the effect of
the catalyst.
(iii) Sketch and label a second Maxwell–Boltzmann energy distribution curve representing the same system but at a higher temperature, Thigher.
(iv) Explain why an increase in temperature increases the rate of this reaction.
c. One of the intermediates in the reaction between nitrogen monoxide and hydrogen is dinitrogen monoxide, N2O. This can be represented by the [4]
(i) Analyse the bonding in dinitrogen monoxide in terms of σ-bonds and Δ-bonds.
Markscheme
a. (i)
(ii)
rate = k [NO]2[H2]
(iii)
test the effect «on the reaction rate» of varying each concentration «independently»
OR
test the effect of varying [NO] «on rate», whilst keeping [H2] constant AND test effect of varying [H2] «on rate», whilst keeping [NO] constant
If only one species in rate expression, third mark can be awarded for zero order discussion.
(iv)
no AND different mechanisms could give the same rate expression
OR
no AND mechanisms can only be disproved
OR
no AND just suggest it is consistent with the mechanism given
OR
no AND does not give information about what occurs after RDS
(v)
change of pressure «at constant volume and temperature» with time
OR
change of volume «at constant pressure and temperature» with time
b. (i)
products lower than reactants AND enthalpy of reaction correctly marked and labelled with name or value
(ii)
lower dotted curve, between same reactants and products levels, labelled “Catalysed”
(iii)
second curve at a higher temperature is correctly drawn (maximum lower and to right of original)
(iv)
OR
c. (i)
ALTERNATIVE 1:
π-bond from N to N
ALTERNATIVE 2:
both have 2 σ-bonds «from N to N and from N to O» AND π-bond from N to N
one structure has second π-bond from N to N and the other has π-bond from N to O
delocalized π-bond/π-electrons
Award [1 max] if candidate has identified both/either structure having 2 σ-bonds and 2 π-bonds
(ii)
more than one possible position for a multiple/π-/pi- bond
Accept “more than one possible Lewis structure”.
Examiners report
[N/A]
a.
[N/A]
b.
[N/A]
c.