Indang Cavite ES2019nhauling
Indang Cavite ES2019nhauling
Indang Cavite ES2019nhauling
Introduction
The Municipality of Indang is centrally located in the Province of Cavite. It is bounded on the
north by the Municipality of Naic and Trece Martires City, on the south by Municipality of
Mendez and Tagaytay City, on the west by Municipalities of Alfonso and Maragondon, and
on the east by the Municipailty of Amadeo. It has a total land area of 8,920 hectares and is
comprise of 36 barangays.
Audit Objectives
The audit was conducted to ascertain the fairness of the presentation of the financial
statements and compliance of the Municipality to laws, rules and regulations as well as the
economical, efficient and effective utilization of resources.
Scope of Audit
Financial and compliance were conducted on the accounts and operations of the
Municipality of Indang, Cavite for Calendar Year (CY) 2019.
Financial Highlights
For CY 2019, the Municipality generated a total income of P221,930,238.35 from local
taxes, permits and licenses, service and business income, internal revenue allotment and
subsidies from national government. Out of the total appropriation of P242,284,072.40 the
total funds utilized for the year amounted to P205,771,925.22, leaving an unexpended
appropriation of P36,512,147.18.
The total assets, liabilities, government equity, income and expenses for CY 2019 compared
with that of the preceding year are as follows:
Increase/
2019 2018
(Decrease)
Total Assets P 412,530,539.33 P 389,119,330.33 P 23,411,209.00
Total Liabilities 140,623,026.98 133,765,152.04 6,857,874.94
Total Equity 271,907,512.35 255,354,178.29 16,553,334.06
Total Income 220,609,271.10 203,401,734.49 17,207,536.61
Total Expenses 196,647,379.72 172,023,815.80 24,623,563.92
Personal Services 77,799,793.52 67,834,084.98 9,965,708.54
MOOE 118,847,586.20 104,189,730.82 14,657,855.38
Transfers and Subsidy
from/to (net) (7,273,547.54) 11,676,618.96 (18,950,166.50)
Net Profit/(Loss) 16,688,343.84 43,054,537.65 (26,366,193.81)
i
Audit Opinion on the Financial Statements
2. The use of account Due to Officers and Employees (2-01-01-020) for incurrence of
liability amounting to P1,399,493.60 to person no longer connected/employed with the
Municipality is not in conformity with COA Circular No. 2015-009, thus, overstating the
said account and understating the Other Payable (2-99-99-990) account by the same
amount.
3. The amount set-up as Due to Other Fund for the unexpended balances of the Quick
Response Fund (QRF) and Mitigation-MOOE portions of the Local Disaster Risk
Reduction Management Fund (LDRRMF) in CY 2019 should have been P6,353,658.30
instead of P6,066,326.64, thus resulting in the understatement of the account by
P287,331.66.
For the deficiencies cited above, we recommended that the Municipal Mayor direct:
1. The Municipal Accountant to use the appropriate account in accounting for payables and
make the necessary adjustment in the books of accounts in conformity with the Revised
Chart of Accounts for LGUs.
2. The Municipal Accountant to make the necessary adjustments to correct the balance of
the Due to Other Funds and other affected accounts both in the General Fund and Trust
Fund books of accounts.
3. The Inventory Committee to conduct physical count of all inventory items and prepare
and submit the corresponding Report of the Physical Count of Inventories to the Office
of the Auditor within the prescribed period.
4. The Municipal Accountant to revert back to the general fund the unexpended balance of
CY 2013 LDRRMF amounting to P92,655.00 to be made available for other social
services, in conformity with Sections 21 and 5.1.13 of RA No. 10121 and COA Circular
No. 2012-002, respectively.
ii
Significant Audit Observations and Recommendations
The other significant observations and recommendations in the audit of the Municipality for
the year 2019 are as follows:
1. Out of the total appropriation of P38,049,763.50 for the 20 per cent Development Fund
in Calendar Year 2019, only P23,285,478.08 or 54.10 per cent were utilized due to
inadequate planning, contrary to Section 5.0 of the Department of the Interior and Local
Government (DILG) and Department of Budget and Management (DBM) Joint
Memorandum Circular No. 2017-1, thus the desirable socio-economic development and
environmental management outcomes were not fully attained by the Municipality.
c. Municipal Engineer to ensure that all preliminary studies and other technical activities
that will establish the feasibility of the projects such as survey, site inspection/
investigation and/or preparation of preliminary detailed engineering are completely
conducted before including the projects in the AIP.
2. Request for Quotations (RFQs) for various infrastructure projects with an aggregate
gross amount of P2,121,635.62 charged against the 20 per cent Development Fund
purchased through Small Value Procurement were not posted in the Philippine
Government Electronic Procurement System (PhilGEPS) website, website of the
Municipality, and at the conspicuous place reserved for this purpose in the premises of
the Municipality, contrary to the 2016 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations of
the Republic Act No. 9184, thus wide dissemination of the procurement to obtain the
most advantageous price was not achieved. Moreover, the BAC did not require
suppliers/contractors to submit the prescribed documents for alternative mode of
procurement, thus casting doubt on the eligibilities and qualifications of the latter.
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor, as the Head of the Procuring Entity (HoPe),
require the Bids and Awards Committee to:
a. post in the PhilGEPS website, website of the Municipality, and at the conspicuous
place reserved for this purpose in the premises of the Municipality for a period of
three (3) calendar days the RFQs for goods/infrastructure projects costing more than
iii
P50,000.00 whenever Small Value Procurement is resorted to as the Alternative
Method of Procurement;
c. ensure that the RFQs contain all the necessary information such as the complete
specifications of the items to be purchased, ABC for the item, and the exact
addresses of the suppliers before they are served to suppliers/ contractors;
3. The validity of the Contract of Services for hauling and disposal of solid waste materials
of the Municipality and the propriety and reasonableness of the monthly billings and
payment therefor totaling P5,339,700.00 could not be ascertained due to inadequate
information and supporting documents, contrary to Section 4(6) of Presidential Decree
(PD) No. 1445 and Commission on Audit (COA) No. 2012-1.
a. Bids and Awards Committee (BAC), MENRO, Municipal Accountant and/or other
concerned officials to take the necessary legal procedures to correct or remedy the
defects noted in the Contract of Services for hauling and disposal of solid waste
materials with RC Bella Waste Management and Disposal Services to enable the
COA Audit Team to conduct auditorial review and request the technical evaluation of
the contract, otherwise relevant transactions will be suspended in audit;
iv
e. MENRO, Municipal Accountant and other Municipal Officials concerned to submit to
the Audit Team the following: i) justification on the discrepancies between the
trucks/equipment actually used and those listed in the bidding documents, ii) detailed
breakdown of the Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC) and the contract amount,
iii) complete monthly Record of Service/Entry of the hauling and disposal activities
from February 7 to November 29, 2019, and iv) Accomplishment Reports by the
Service Provider duly accepted by the MENRO, for further evaluation and to avoid
suspension of the subject transactions in audit.
4. Various disbursements charged against the Special Education Fund (SEF) totaling
P1,731,776.95 were not supported with complete documentation and/or adequate
information, contrary to Section 4(6) of the Presidential Decree No. 1445, thus validity,
legality and propriety of the transactions cannot be established.
Of the 27 audit recommendations embodied in CY 2018 Annual Audit Report, 18 were fully
implemented, six were partially implemented and the remaining three were not implemented
by the Municipality.