Marantao Executive Summary 2022
Marantao Executive Summary 2022
Marantao Executive Summary 2022
Introduction
The Municipality of Marantao is a 2nd class municipality in the Province of Lanao del
Sur. According to the census last 2015, the Municipality has a population of 32,974. The
source of revenue and income of the municipality depends mainly from the share on
internal revenue allotment received from the national government.
The municipality is now under the leadership of Hon. Akira Indol Alonto who won in the
just concluded Local and National Elections on May 13, 2019. He comes from a strong
political clan, the brother in-law of the incumbent governor of Lanao del Sur and at the
time his uncle from maternal side. The Municipal Government of Marantao is composed
of 35 component Barangays. Like other municipalities in the province, its populace is
about 98 percent Maranao. Also, Maranao dialect is the most widely spoken language.
Arabic studies likewise is widely taught among the Madrasa and elementary schools in
the municipality so that considerable number of its populace can read, write and speak
Arabic but government public schools use English as the medium of instruction.
By virtue of Republic Act 7160, “The Local Government Code of the Philippines”, the
Municipality of Marantao is mandated to develop its own capacities for self-governance
and to build a self-sufficient community in pursuit of the very essence of local autonomy
to operate hand in hand with other government agencies in serving its constituents. Its
responsibility and role as the premier level of local government unit in the Municipality is
to ensure effective delivery of basic services to the people. The basic services the
municipal government provides are as follows:
a) Administrative Services;
b) Legislative Services;
c) Maintenance of Peace and Order;
d) Primary Health Services;
e) Social Welfare Services;
f) Infrastructure Services, and
g) Economic and Agricultural Services
In the pursuit to attain its state purpose, the municipality also exercises police power,
power of eminent domain, power of taxation and corporate powers as sanctioned by the
Code.
Financial Highlights
The financial profiles of the Municipality of Marantao for the year then ended December
31, 2022 with comparative figures for calendar year 2021 are shown on the next table:
i
Financial Position
Financial Performance
Scope of Audit
The Audit Team Leader rendered a qualified opinion on the financial statements due to
The Audit Team Leader rendered a qualified opinion due to non-conduct of a physical
count of its Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) in the sum of ₱66,172,808.95 and the
non-recognition of depreciation expenses for the Municipality’s Road Networks which
resulted to an understatement of an expense account and overstatement of the related
asset account, thus, both findings affect the fairness of the presentation of the financial
statements as of December 31, 2022.
1. The existence, accuracy and valuation of the balances of the Property, Plant
and Equipment (PPE) in the total amount of ₱66,172,808.95 cannot be
ascertained due to inability of the management to update and submit the
Report on the Physical Count of Property, Plant and Equipment (RPCPPE),
which is contrary to Section 124, Volume I of the New Government
Accounting System Manual (MNGAS) for Local Government Units (LGUs).
ii
We recommended that Municipal Mayor:
4. The Report on Sources and Utilization of Local Disaster Risk Reduction and
Management (LDRRM) Fund for the CY 2022 were not submitted and
cannot be verified of its propriety and was not adequately disclosed in the
Notes to Financial Statements, in contrary with Item Nos. 5.1.5, 5.1.10 and
5.1.16 of COA Circular No. 2012-002.
iii
We reiterated to recommend that Local Chief Executive require:
5. The Municipality has not provided the Office of the Auditor a list of all on-
going projects/programs/activities (PPAs) and those that are to be
implemented for the CY 2022 as required in Items 2.1 and 3.1 of COA
Circular No. 2013-004, thus, timely monitoring and rendition of appropriate
audit action could not be made thereon.
We recommended that Local Chief Executive enforce the due compliance with
the requirements prescribed under COA Circular No. 2013-004, specifically the
following:
a. At the beginning of the year, the SA/ATL should be provided with a list of
all-on-going government PPAs and those that are to be implemented during
the year;
b. Provide the ATL with a monthly “Project Status” based on the data of the
monthly monitoring report of PPAs; and
c. Inform the SA/ATL within 10 days after the award of the infrastructure
project or before the start of the program/activity with appropriate project
signboards and/or public notices.
a. Municipal Treasurer to submit the monthly RCI, ROD, RCD and other
related financial transaction documents regularly at the end of the month to
the Municipal Accountant; and
iv
b. The Municipal Accountant, thereafter, shall submit to the Office of the
Audit Team Leader the monthly RCI, ROD and RCD within the first 10
days of the ensuing month and the quarterly interim financial statements not
later than the fifth (5th) day of the ensuing quarter for audit and verification.
9. The Municipality has not submitted to the Office of the Auditor the Monthly
Report of Fuel Consumption of government motor transportation within the
first 10 days of the succeeding month which is contrary to Section 361 of
Government Accounting and Auditing Manual (GAAM) thus, precluded the
Audit Team to conduct timely review thereof.
v
10. Payment of Pakyaw Labor Contract for vegetation control activity on
various municipal roads were doubtful due to non-submission of complete
supporting documents required under Section 9.1.3.2 of COA Circular No.
2012-001 rendered doubt on the regularity and validity of the transaction.
We recommended that the Honorable Mayor enjoin the Municipal Treasurer and
the Municipal Accountant to see to it that required documents are prepared and
submitted prior to payment of salaries and wages of laborers/workers.
Of the 22 prior years’ audit recommendations, there were seven (7) fully
implemented, nine (9) partially implemented and six (6) more were not yet implemented
as of report date. The details of which is provided as Part III of this report.
vi