Ihmtc2017 04 1149
Ihmtc2017 04 1149
IHMTC2017-04-1149
25
37
37
49
49
39
39
15
40
(a) (b)
Figure 1. REVERSE AIR FLOW COMBUSTOR GEOMETRY
(a) SIMPLE CONICAL INJECTOR, (b) REVERSE FUEL
INJECTOR
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
X=0
A schematic diagram of experimental test facility is shown Figure 4. AXIAL STATIONS ON VERTICAL PLANE
in figure 2. The test setup is equipped with fuel and air lines and
measurement system. The combustor is made of stainless steel
304 material. Air required for combustion is supplied by a Figure 5 shows radial profiles of axial velocity at different
blower at desired pressure. Variable frequency drive is used to stations for various fuel injector models. At station b peaks of
control the air flow rate by controlling the blower motor speed. velocity are at off-center for all fuel injectors. This shows that
The total air flow rate is kept constant at 0.07 kg/s for all test main flow resulting from burning of fuel is present in this
cases. Methane is used as fuel. The air-fuel ratio (AFR) equal region. The magnitude of velocity increases in the central core
to 50 is maintained during experiments. Exhaust gas of primary region when reverse fuel injector is used in place of
temperature distribution is measured with the help of conical fuel injector. The higher gas velocity indicates
thermocouples. Figure 3 shows arrangement of thermocouples improvement in fuel-air mixing in the primary region. At
at the exit of combustor. Thermographic image of outer wall of station d peaks of velocity shifts radially outward which reveals
combustor is captured with the help of thermal imaging camera. that products of combustion expands due to burning of fuel.
Variation of velocity in radial direction is small at station d
compared to station b. The symmetrical nature of velocity
profile obtained at b and d is not observed at station m. This is
because the exit section of combustor is a non-symmetrical
circular to rectangular nozzle. At station m, velocity gradually
increases up to mid of positive radial position. This is because
flow converges in positive radial direction as it flows through
nozzle section.
0.03 0.03
Figure 2. DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTAL TEST SETUP 0.02 0.02
0.01 0.01
100.00
0 0
-0.01 -0.01
-0.02 -0.02
25.00
-0.03 -0.03
-0.04 -0.04
-0.05 -0.05
0 15 30 45 60 75 0 15 30 45 60 75
10.00 Thermocouples Velocity (m/s) Velocity (m/s)
All dimensions are in mm
Station b Station d
Figure 3. EXIT SECTION OF COMBUSTOR
0.05 efficiency is enhanced. The profile of combustion efficiency
0.04
resembles that of the average exit temperature profile. The
0.03
0.02
0.01
1
0 Conical injector Reverse fuel injector
-0.01
-0.02 Figure 8. PATTERN FACTOR
-0.03
-0.04
-0.05 Measurement of combustor exit temperature
500 1000 1500 2000
Temperatuer (K)
Exhaust gas temperature of reverse air flow combustor is
Station m
measured for different fuel injector configurations. Methane is
Figure 6. TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS
used as fuel. The exit section of combustor is shown in figure
3. Temperature profiles obtained for different fuel injectors are
Combustion efficiency and pattern factor compared and presented in figure 9. In figure 9, X=0m position
is the face center of exit whereas X=0.05m represents the wall.
The performance assessment of reverse air flow CAN
The comparison between conical fuel injector and reverse fuel
combustor is demonstrated based on calculation of combustion
injector reveals that temperature at central core of exit region is
efficiency and pattern factor. Figure 7 shows the average exit
nearly same in both cases. The change in temperature is
temperatures (Texit) and corresponding combustion efficiency
observed in region between center and wall. Temperature is
(Ƞ) for different fuel injector configurations. It can be seen that
increased in this region when reverse fuel injector is used. This
the average exit temperature is 951 K when original fuel
rise in temperature shows that more amount of heat energy is
injector is used. As original injector is replaced with reverse
released during combustion as a result of enhanced burning rate
fuel injector, the exit temperature jumps to 1009 K. The
of fuel.
combustion efficiency is a measure of amount of heat energy
released during combustion out of total heat available. The
higher average exit temperature reveals that the combustion
1500
original 1. Higher value of average temperature at exit of
5mm combustor is observed with reverse fuel injector
model. This increase in average temperature at exit is
Temperature (K)
1250
attributed to increased turbulence kinetic energy in the
1000 primary region due to better fuel-air mixing in this
region.
750 2. The combustion efficiency and pattern factor are
improved with reverse fuel flow pattern in reverse air
500
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 flow CAN combustor.
Distance from center to wall (m) 3. Thermal imaging of outer casing wall of combustor
Figure 9. TEMPERATURE PROFILES AT EXIT demonstrates that wall temperature increases when
reverse fuel injector is used in combustor.