Adult Psychiatry II: Paper B Syllabic Content 7.1x
Adult Psychiatry II: Paper B Syllabic Content 7.1x
Adult Psychiatry II: Paper B Syllabic Content 7.1x
We claim copyright for our own text material, productions and adaptations. We claim no
rights to Images/Figures with CC-BY-SA license if they are used in this material.
© SPMM Course 1
1. Anxiety Disorders - Overview
15% of adults in the UK at any time have broadly defined neurosis according to National Psychiatric
Morbidity Survey (NPMS, 1995). In this study, the UK prevalence of anxiety disorder was higher than
depression (consistent with ECA and NCS studies from the USA). Phobic disorder the most common in
ECA & NCS but in NPMS – the most common anxiety disorder was mixed anxiety-‐‑depression followed
by GAD. 25% of all GP consultations are for anxiety related symptoms.
Considering the mean age of onset for various anxiety disorders, the following pattern is noted; GAD – 30
years, Panic disorder – 22 to 25 years, OCD – 20 years, social phobia – 15 years, specific phobia – varies
with individual categories – blood injury injection or environmental types start around age 5 to 9 years
while situational phobia starts around 20 years of age.
Sex distribution of anxiety disorders is an important topic often tested in the exams. As a general rule, all
anxiety disorders are common in women than men. Notable exceptions are OCD, which is more in boys
than girls, but equally common in adult men and women. Also, men outnumber women in attending
health care centres for social phobia.
Summary of NICE guidance: treatment for generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder and OCD
Ø A ‘stepped care’ approach to help in choosing the most effective intervention
Ø A comprehensive assessment that considers the degree of distress and functional impairment;
the effect of any co-‐‑morbid mental illness, substance misuse or medical condition; and past
response to treatment
Ø Treat the primary disorder first
Ø Psychological therapy is more effective than pharmacological therapy and should be used as
first line where possible.
Ø Pharmacological therapy is also effective. Most evidence supports the use of SSRIs
Ø Consider combination therapy for complex anxiety disorders that are refractory to treatment
© SPMM Course 2
2. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder:
Epidemiology: The point prevalence of OCD is as high as 1-‐‑3% of adults and 1-‐‑2% of children and
adolescents (community samples). The lifetime prevalence of OCD is fairly constant – around 2-‐‑3%. It is
the fourth most commonly prevalent psychiatric disorder in epidemiological studies (after phobias,
alcohol use, and depression). The gender ratio of OCD in clinical samples is roughly equal, but females
predominate in community populations (~1.5:1), this may be because men have more severe
psychopathology. Males with OCD showed an earlier onset and a trend toward more tics and poorer
outcome than females. (Heyman et al., 2006)
Presentation: Recent factor analytic studies of obsessions and compulsions in OCD tend to show a four-‐‑
factor model (Castle & Phillips, 2006):
• 1. Those associated with somatic preoccupation e.g.body dysmorphic disorder, hypochondriasis or
anorexia nervosa.
• 2. Those associated with neurological disorders (repetitive behaviours) e.g. Tourette syndrome,
Sydenham'ʹs chorea and autistic spectrum.
• 3. Those associated with impulse control disorders or with rousing or pleasurable repetitive
behaviours e.g. paraphilias, kleptomania, trichotillomania, and pathological gambling. (Castle &
Phillips, 2006)
• Anankastic personality can also be considered a part of OCD spectrum.
National Institute of Mental Health Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for PANDAS
1. The presence of OCD or a tic disorder.
2. Onset between 3 years of age and the beginning of puberty.
3. Abrupt onset of symptoms or a course characterized by dramatic exacerbations of symptoms.
4. The onset or the exacerbations of symptoms is temporally related to infection with GABHS.
5. Abnormal results of the neurologic examination (hyperactivity, choreiform movements, and/or tics) during an
exacerbation.
© SPMM Course 3
Note that the neuropsychiatric symptoms need not have onset during the streptococcal (group A
beta-‐‑hemolytic) infection; exacerbation correlated temporally is also acceptable for a diagnosis.
AntiDNAseB or Antistreptolysin O titres are likely to be elevated in most with recent
streptococcal infection. A fraction of these may have autoantibodies to neurons in basal ganglia
called anti basal ganglia antibodies.
mild to moderate
step 1 self-‐‑help
step 2: CBT with ERP
step 3: SSRIs+/-‐‑ CBT
Exposure and response prevention is a key element of CBT for of OCD. Patients are trained to confront
(directly or in imagination) anxiety-‐‑provoking situations while abstaining from compulsive behaviours in
response. Periodic exposure and response prevention “booster” sessions can reduce the risk of relapse
and provide more durable remission than using pharmacotherapy alone.
OCD shows a selective response to serotonergic medications such as clomipramine and SSRIs. Around 60
to 70% of patients experience some degree of improvement after SSRI treatment (typically at a higher
dose, given for a longer duration than for depression). NNT for SSRIs (vs. placebo) varies between 6 and
12. Antipsychotic augmentation is indicated if no response is seen after a three-‐‑month trial of a maximal
dose of SSRI. This is especially useful when tics are also seen.
© SPMM Course 4
3. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder:
Diagnostic criteria for PTSD have been altered in DSM-‐‑5. PTSD (as well as Acute Stress Disorder) have
been moved from anxiety disorders into a new class of "ʺtrauma and stressor-‐‑related disorders."ʺ A history
of exposure to a traumatic event that meets specific stipulations and symptoms from each of four
symptom clusters: intrusion, avoidance, negative alterations in cognitions and mood (including self-‐‑blame
or blaming others persistently), and alterations in arousal and reactivity (including reckless and
destructive behaviour). A clinical subtype "ʺwith dissociative symptoms"ʺ has also been added.
Epidemiology: The incidence varies across the world. Point prevalence is 1%. The National Comorbidity
Survey Replication (NCS-‐‑R) found the lifetime prevalence of PTSD among adult Americans to be 6.8%.
The lifetime prevalence among men was 3.6%, and among women was 9.7%. It is unclear whether the
gender difference is due to higher exposure to trauma or greater vulnerability to develop PTSD.
Males are more likely than females to be exposed to traumatic events (60% males vs. 50% females). But
females develop PTSD two times more frequently (12% vs. 6% in NCS) even after controlling the type of
trauma. It is unclear if this is due to higher exposure to trauma or greater vulnerability to develop PTSD.
Up to 30% of people exposed to trauma may develop PTSD. The most frequently experienced trauma is
witnessing someone being badly injured or killed, followed by exposure to fire, flood or natural disaster,
being involved in a life-‐‑threatening accident and combat exposure. Molestation is more common in
females than males. Mugging is more common in males than females. But in both instances women
develop more PTSD. The only trauma where men develop more PTSD is rape.
PTSD is more common in younger than older individuals; more common in those with higher anxiety
response to the initial event and in those who perceive external locus of control (as opposed to internal
locus).
NICE encourages primary care diagnosis and screening, as PTSD is probably underdiagnosed.
Aetiology: Resilience to trauma is a dynamic factor; individuals who may not develop PTSD after
one trauma may develop after another.
Factors associated with post-‐‑traumatic stress disorder (from Bisson, 2007) include pre-‐‑traumatic factors
such as previous psychiatric disorder, females gender, personality (external locus of control greater than
internal locus of control), lower socioeconomic and educational status, ethnic minority status and
personality disorders (cluster B); peritraumatic factors include the higher severity of trauma, perceived
threat to life and peritraumatic dissociation. Post-‐‑traumatic factors include perceived lack of social
support, subsequent life stress or physical illness (especially chronic pain). Protective factors include high
IQ, higher social class, and getting an opportunity to grieve for the loss (e.g. viewing the dead body of
friend/relative after trauma).
Hippocampus and amygdala show neuroimaging abnormalities. Hypocortisolaemia is reported in PTSD.
Strong avoidance features may predict chronicity in PTSD.
© SPMM Course 5
Prevention of PTSD:
What are the effects of interventions to prevent post-‐‑traumatic stress disorder (Bisson, Clinical evidence
2004)?
Likely to be beneficial Multiple-‐‑session CBT to prevent PTSD in people with acute
stress disorder (reduced PTSD compared with supportive
counselling)
Unknown effectiveness Multiple-‐‑session CBT to prevent PTSD in all people exposed to
a traumatic event
Propranolol to prevent PTSD
Single-‐‑session group debriefing to prevent PTSD
Temazepam to prevent PTSD
Unlikely to be beneficial Single-‐‑session individual debriefing to prevent PTSD
Supportive counselling to prevent PTSD
(Prescriber 2005; 15(8):40-‐‑48, Ballanger et al., J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61 (Suppl 5):60-‐‑66)
• Watchful waiting where symptoms are mild and have been present for less than 4 weeks after the
trauma
• The prescription of a non-‐‑benzodiazepine sleeping tablet after four consecutive nights’ sleep
disturbance is recommended
• Psychological treatment should be done in a regular and continuous (usually at least once a week)
manner and should be delivered by the same person
• Non-‐‑trauma-‐‑focused interventions such as relaxation or non-‐‑directive therapy should not be used
routinely since these do not address traumatic memories
• Interventions used when symptoms are present within 3 months of a trauma
o trauma-‐‑focused cognitive behavioural therapy which includes a combination of exposure
therapy, cognitive therapy and stress management
o Should be offered to those with severe post-‐‑traumatic symptoms or with severe PTSD in
the first month after the traumatic event and people who present with PTSD within 3
months of the event
o Normally provided on an individual outpatient basis; around 8–12 sessions are usually
offered (five sessions if the treatment starts within 1 month of the event)
© SPMM Course 6
o The prescription of a nonbenzodiazepine medication after four consecutive nights of sleep
disturbance is recommended. For short-‐‑term use -‐‑ hypnotic medication; For longer-‐‑term
use – an early introduction of a suitable antidepressant should be done to avoid
dependence.
• Interventions used when symptoms are present for more than 3 months after a trauma
o trauma-‐‑focused CBT or eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR)
o Up to 12 sessions can be offered. In case of treatment failure or limited improvement with a
specific trauma-‐‑focused psychological treatment, consider an alternative form of trauma-‐‑
focused psychological treatment; if no improvement considers pharmacological treatment.
o Paroxetine, mirtazapine for general use; amitriptyline or phenelzine for specialist use.
Sertraline RCT evidence; but NICE appraisal did not show significance. Licensed for females
not males with PTSD in the UK.
Imipramine & Poor quality of evidence; but a statistically significant result for Amitriptyline; not
Amitriptyline so for imipramine.
Phenelzine Poor quality of evidence; but statistically significant result
Considerable research has been conducted in particular approaches to the psychotherapy of PTSD. The
evidence indicates that modalities tested in Randomised Controlled Trials are far from 100% applicable
and effective. The RCT model itself is inadequate for evaluating treatments of conditions with complex
presentations and multiple comorbidities. Psychotherapy studies often exclude patients with comorbidity
and complexity (Corrigan & Hull, 2015)
In a meta-‐‑analysis by Bisson et al. (2007) no evidence of a difference in efficacy between TFCBT and EMDR
was noted, but there was some evidence that TFCBT and EMDR were superior to stress management and
other therapies, and that stress management was superior to other therapies. In a Cochrane review it was
shown that psychological debriefing after trauma is either equivalent to, or worse than, control or
educational interventions in preventing or reducing the severity of PTSD, depression, anxiety and general
© SPMM Course 7
psychological morbidity after trauma. There is some suggestion that it may increase the risk of PTSD and
depression.
Trauma-‐‑focused CBT: May includes exposure therapy wherein repeated confrontation of traumatic
memories and repeated exposure to avoided situations take place together with relaxation and anxiety
reduction. In trauma-‐‑focused cognitive component modification of misinterpretations that lead to
overestimation of current threat and modification of other beliefs related to the traumatic experience and
the individual'ʹs behaviour during the trauma (for example, guilt and shame) are attempted via cognitive
restructuring process. Trauma-‐‑focused psychological treatment should usually be given for eight to 12
sessions
Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing: This was serendipitously discovered by a psychologist
(Shapiro) when she first applied it to herself. It is based on the theory that bilateral stimulation, in the form
of eye movements, allows the processing of traumatic memories. While the patient focuses on specific
images, negative sensations and associated cognitions, bilateral stimulation is applied to desensitize the
individual to these memories and more positive sensations and cognitions are introduced.
Outcome: More than a third of people reported having the disorder six years after they first developed it.
50% chance of remission at two years.
Acute stress disorder is a diagnostically different entity from PTSD. To diagnose acute stress reaction,
there must be an immediate and clear temporal connection between the impact of an exceptional stressor
and the onset of symptoms. The symptoms usually appear within minutes of the impact of the stressful
stimulus or event and disappear within 2-‐‑3 days (often within hours). Partial or complete amnesia for the
episode may be present. In addition, the symptoms:
(a) Show a mixed and usually changing picture; in addition to the initial state of "ʺdaze"ʺ, depression,
anxiety, anger, despair, overactivity, and withdrawal may all be seen, but no one type of symptom
predominates for long;
(b) Resolve rapidly (within a few hours at the most) in those cases where removal from the stressful
environment is possible; in cases where the stress continues or cannot by its nature be reversed, the
symptoms usually begin to diminish after 24-‐‑48 hours and are usually minimal after about 3 days.
This diagnosis should not be used to cover sudden exacerbations of symptoms in individuals already
showing symptoms that fulfill the criteria for any other psychiatric disorder, except for those in F60
(personality disorders). However, a history of previous psychiatric disorder does not invalidate the use of
this diagnosis.
© SPMM Course 8
4. Generalised Anxiety Disorder:
The feature of avoidance seen in other anxiety disorders is not needed for a diagnosis of GAD; it is often
punctuated by depressive episodes and co-‐‑existent with a number of comorbid diseases.
Epidemiology: the lifetime prevalence of DSM-‐‑IV GAD is estimated to be about 5%; point prevalence is
about 2% to 3% (Weisberg, 2009)
Aetiology: Twin studies suggest MZ concordance 41% vs. DZ 4%, though the rates vary in different
samples (e.g. Andrews et al. study -‐‑ 21.5% concordance in MZ twins, compared with a 13.5% in DZ). Risk
factors include exposure to civilian trauma, bullying or peer victimisation. a higher number of life events,
being a first-‐‑degree relative of a GAD patient and female gender.
Hamilton anxiety scale is a 14-‐‑item instrument that emphasizes somatic symptoms. Treatment response is
generally defined as a 50% reduction in baseline score. Clinical recovery is often defined as a score of less
than 7 on the Hamilton anxiety scale.
Treatment:
NICE recommends that an SSRI should be used as a first line. SNRIs and pregabalin are alternative
choices. Among psychological treatments, both CBT and anxiety management therapy are useful though
CBT may be better in efficacy. CBT includes education, relaxation training, and exposure and cognitive
restructuring.
Guidelines including NICE suggest that there is insufficient evidence to recommend combined
psychological and pharmacological treatment initially, although this can be considered if initial treatment
fails.
Outcome: At 12-‐‑year follow-‐‑up of adults at an anxiety clinic, 42% of patients had recovered from
generalised anxiety disorder, but the disorder was a marker for poor outcome in those patients who had
another anxiety disorder.
© SPMM Course 9
Herbal Treatment of Anxiety: The kava shrub (Piper methysticum) has been studied in anxiety disorders
and appears to be effective in some trials. Gingko and valerian are not effective; common lavender, saffron,
German chamomile and lemon balm appear promising (Ernst 13 (4): 312. APT (2007).
o The effects of kava are due to the kavapyrones, which in animal models act as muscle relaxants and
anticonvulsants, protect against strychnine poisoning, and reduce limbic system excitability.
o They may cause inhibition of voltage-‐‑dependent sodium channels, increase GABAA receptor
densities, block norepinephrine reuptake, and suppress the release of glutamate.
o Several double-‐‑blind, placebo-‐‑controlled trials have shown kava to be more effective than placebo
in reducing HAM-‐‑A scale scores, and this effect is detectable even within 1 week of therapy.
Werneke et al. in found that kava (Piper methysticum) was the most researched remedy for anxiety
and that there was good evidence for its anxiolytic effect. A Cochrane review reported of 11 RCTs
showed that kava is the only herbal remedy that has been proven to be effective in reducing anxiety.
But kava cannot be recommended for clinical use because of an association with hepatotoxicity,
which has led to its withdrawal from the UK market.
o Kava is associated with allergic, sometimes fatal hepatotoxicity and so not recommended for
general use. (Beaubrun & Gray, 2000)
o Cochrane reviews of valerian and passiflora showed no efficacy in anxiety compared to diazepam.
o Kava can interact with levodopa and alprazolam, causing extrapyramidal symptoms or lethargy.
Valerian can interact with loperamide and fluoxetine, causing delirium. Evening primrose oil can
interact with phenothiazides, causing epileptic seizures.
5. Social Phobia:
Point prevalence is 2.8%. Two types are recognised (Schneier, 2003): A generalised subtype where fear
occurs in most social situations. This leads to higher impairment and patients are more likely to seek
treatment, than the second subtype. A situational or non generalised subtype presents as fear of public
speaking or performance anxiety.
Treatments: The best-‐‑established treatments are CBT & SSRIs. Benzodiazepines should not be used.
• Paroxetine, sertraline, fluoxetine and fluvoxamine, escitalopram, venlafaxine have been evaluated
in RCTs with a favourable outcome. Normal antidepressant doses can be used but may need a
longer 12-‐‑week trial to establish outcome. Drug treatment should continue for at least 6-‐‑12 months
after the response.
• Phenelzine is the second line treatment. Moclobemide is also effective.
• Short-‐‑term use of benzodiazepines including clonazepam and novel anticonvulsant gabapentin
has been evaluated with some evidence.
• SSRI + clonazepam combination, gabapentin or pregabalin can be tried as third-‐‑line agents.
• Blockers are not significantly different from placebo in generalised subtype, but they can be used
on/off in performance anxiety subtype.
Ø Self-‐‑help principles should be encouraged.
© SPMM Course 10
6. Panic Disorder:
Panic can exist in different forms. Major classificatory systems recognise panic disorder, agoraphobia and
comorbid panic disorder with agoraphobia. DSM puts panic disorder as primary dysfunction while ICD
focuses on agoraphobia. To diagnose panic disorder, there must be frequent panic attacks within a
specified time interval.
Epidemiology: It is increasingly being realised that panic attacks can occur without fully satisfying panic
disorder criteria. Patients with such panic attacks have a significant impairment, help seeking and
medication requirement. Point prevalence of panic disorder is 0.9%. The NCS-‐‑R collected data on four
composite groups: Isolated panic attacks (PA only), Panic attacks with AG (PA-‐‑AG), Panic disorder (PD
only), PD with AG (PD-‐‑AG). Lifetime prevalence of PA only was 28% while 4.7% had lifetime PD. Only
1.1% had PD-‐‑AG while 0.8% had lifetime PA-‐‑AG. Cued panic attacks are common in PD and AG
compared to isolated PA where non-‐‑cued out of blue panic is seen. The mean age of onset of any panic
attack – irrespective of diagnosis – is around 22 years. All-‐‑cause mortality is increased by 1.9 times (SMR)
in those with panic disorder.
The ICD-‐‑10 classifies panic disorder as recurrent, unpredictable panic attacks, with sudden onset of
palpitations, chest pain, choking sensations, dizziness, and feelings of unreality, often with
associated fear of dying, losing control, or going mad, but without the requirement for the symptoms
to have persisted for 1 month or longer.
Aetiology: An estimated heritability of 30%-‐‑40% is noted. According to cognitive theory patients with
panic disorder have a heightened sensitivity to internal bodily sensations. A fear network involving the
amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex and hypothalamus has been implicated in some neuroimaging studies.
A. Hypochondriasis
Classed in ICD-‐‑10 as a preoccupation with the fear of having a serious disease based on the
misrepresentation of bodily symptoms. DSM-‐‑V has removed hypochondriasis as a disorder as the
name was perceived as pejorative and most patients with a former diagnosis of hypochondriasis
would now be diagnosed as having Somatic Symptom Disorder or Illness Anxiety Disorder (see
below).
Prevalence and Risk Factors
Most information comes from studies conducted in primary care. Prevalence has been reported
between 0.8 and 4.5%. There is no conclusive data about specific risk factors, but there are
associations with anxiety, depressive and other somatoform disorders.
Treatment
CBT has been shown to be efficacious, and group cognitive-‐‑behavioural therapy may also be useful.
SSRIs may also be efficacious.
Treatment: High-‐‑dose SSRIs used for a longer duration than the usual antidepressant trial period can be
effective. Fluoxetine has RCT evidence in this regard. Antipsychotics have also been studied with variable
success. Pimozide has anecdotal support though the risk of QT prolongation precludes wider use. CBT
has been shown to be effective in a number of case series; combination with fluoxetine may treat resistant
cases.
Outcome: The prognosis of psychotic variant is generally poor with waxing and waning course. But there
is often a relatively preserved psychosocial functioning in many patients, in line with the outcomes seen in
persistent delusional disorders.
A high proportion of patients with MUS have undiagnosed and, therefore, untreated mental disorder.
Rohricht and Elanjithara (2009) reported that 42% of those with MUS had a primary diagnosis of
somatoform disorder, 36% had a depressive disorder and depressive symptoms medicated by the effect of
somatic symptoms.
Presentation: The reliability of medically unexplained symptoms is limited; they are a feature of Somatic
Symptom Disorders (DSM-‐‑V); Somatic Symptom Disorders can also accompany diagnosed medical
disorders. The emphasis on a diagnosis of Somatic Symptom Disorder is on the maladaptive thoughts,
feelings, and behaviours associated with the somatic symptoms.
© SPMM Course 13
Treatment: A review of studies carried out in primary, secondary, and tertiary care settings by
Sumathipala et al 2007 showed three types of interventions to be supported by evidence for medically
unexplained symptoms, namely: antidepressant medication, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), and
other nonspecific interventions.
• There is more level I evidence for CBT compared to other approaches.
• CBT is efficacious for the broader category of medically unexplained symptoms by reducing
physical symptoms, psychological distress, and disability.
• No studies have compared pharmacological and psychological treatments.
• Most trials assessed only short-‐‑term outcomes.
New and locally derived collaborative care models of active engagement in primary care settings are
recommended. Patients with somatoform disorder may benefit from Body-‐‑Oriented Psychological
Therapy, mentalization-‐‑based CBT, and brief psychodynamic interpersonal therapy.
D. Dissociative Disorders:
Dissociative disorders refer to a set of conditions that involve disruptions or breakdowns of memory,
identity, or perception. ICD-‐‑10 classifies Conversion Disorder as a dissociative disorder. DSM-‐‑V lists:
Dissociative Identity Disorder (the distinct alternation of two or more distinct personality states with
impaired recall among personality states; and Dissociative Amnesia (the temporary loss of recall memory,
specifically episodic memory, due to a traumatic or stressful event. Classed under this is Dissociative
Fugue (reversible amnesia for personal identity, usually involving unplanned travel or wandering,
sometimes accompanied by the establishment of a new identity). Included in the Dissociative Disorders is
Depersonalisation/derealisation disorder.
Prevalence: Some surveys estimate that 10% of the adult population has dissociative disorder
(according to DSM-‐‑III definition). It appears to be as common as anxiety, mood and substance
misuse disorders. It may be that more women present with the severest symptoms, but several
studies have found no gender differences in the prevalence of Dissociative Disorders.
Aetiology: Patients with Dissociative Disorders report high frequencies of childhood psychological
trauma, in particular childhood sexual abuse (57-‐‑90%), emotional abuse (57%), physical abuse (62-‐‑82%)
and neglect (62%).
Treatment: The aim is to integrate feelings, perceptions, thoughts and memories. The international
Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation recommend individual psychotherapy (especially
structured therapy such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and DBT) and skills training,
although studies in this field are in their infancy.
© SPMM Course 14
8. Eating Disorders:
3 major types are recognised by ICD-‐‑10: Anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and EDNOS – atypical ED or
ED not otherwise specified. Binge eating disorder is the increasingly recognised fourth type, but falling
under EDNOS currently. But the stability of individual ED diagnoses is poor; patients migrate from one to
other very often. Notably at least 1/4th to 1/3rd of those with bulimia have a past history of anorexia though
migration from bulimia to anorexia is somewhat rare.
In the diagnostic criteria for Anorexia Nervosa (AN) the value of the amenorrhoea criterion is
questionable as most female patients who have BMI around 17.5 and body image disturbance are
amenorrhoeic; those who have intact periods have same clinical features and outcome as those who satisfy
all 3 criteria. In DSM-‐‑5, the requirement for amenorrhoea has been eliminated.
In bulimia binge eating episodes are characteristically seen (may also occur in anorexia). DSM-‐‑V specifies
a once-‐‑weekly frequency for binge eating and inappropriate compensatory behavior as a diagnostic
criterion. The amount of food intake during binges varies from 1000 kCals to 2000 kCals. Most patients
with bulimia have an immense feeling of loss of control and so seek and engage in treatment better than
anorexia patients.
Anorexia Bulimia
Onset mostly in adolescents Mostly young adults; little later
onset
Excess in higher social class Even class distribution
0.5-‐‑1% prevalence in teenage 1-‐‑2% prevalence in 16-‐‑35 age
girls group
19/100 000 females per year 29/100 000 females per year
(adapted from Fairburn & Harrison, 2003)
65% patients with anorexia have depression; 34% have social phobia while 26% have OCD.
Aetiology: Shared familial liability is noted among the three EDs. EDs are also associated with certain
personality traits. Substance use is increased in families of bulimic probands; obsessional and perfectionist
traits are increased in families of anorexic probands.
Monozygotes Dizygotes
Anorexia nervosa 55% 5%
Bulimia nervosa 35% 30%
A significant heritability exists for anorexia nervosa but not for bulimia nervosa.
© SPMM Course 15
Risk factors: (adapted from Fairburn & Harrison, 2003)
§ Female sex, adolescence and early adulthood
§ Western cultural adaptation
§ Family history of ED, depression, substance misuse, especially alcoholism (for bulimia nervosa),
obesity (for bulimia nervosa)
§ Adverse parenting (especially low contact, high expectations, parental discord), childhood sexual
abuse, critical comments about eating, shape, or weight from family and others
§ Occupational and recreational pressure to be slim
§ Low self-‐‑esteem, perfectionism (anorexia nervosa more than bulimia nervosa)
§ Past history of being obese (bulimia nervosa)
§ Early menarche (bulimia nervosa)
Binge eating disorder (BED) is characterized by recurrent episodes of binge eating in the absence of
extreme weight-‐‑control behaviour. There is often a background of a general tendency to overeat. An
association with obesity is seen; 5–10% of those seeking treatment for obesity have BED. Patients typically
present in their 40s, with more males compared to other EDs, but only 25% of all binge-‐‑eating population
are males. A high degree of spontaneous remission is seen; stress associated overeating is a common
phenomenon in those with BED. Self-‐‑help, behavioural weight loss programmes and CBT/IPT can help.
Physical symptoms of EDs:
• Increased sensitivity to cold
• Gastrointestinal symptoms—e.g., constipation, fullness after eating, bloatedness
• Dizziness and syncope
• Amenorrhoea (in females not taking an oral contraceptive), low sexual appetite, infertility
• Poor sleep with early morning wakening
Physical signs of EDs:
• Emaciation; stunted growth and failure of breast development (if prepubertal onset)
• Dry skin; fine downy hair (lanugo) on the back, forearms, and side of the face; in patients with
hypercarotenaemia, orange discolouration of the skin
• Russel’s sign – calluses in knuckles due to repeated vomit induction
• Swelling of parotid and submandibular glands (especially in bulimic patients)
• Erosion of inner surface of front teeth (perimylolysis) in those who vomit frequently
• Cold hands and feet; hypothermia
• Bradycardia (heart rate around 40 is common); orthostatic hypotension; cardiac arrhythmias
(especially in underweight patients and those with electrolyte abnormalities). Systolic BP may
drop up to 70 in the extremely starved.
• Dependent oedema (complicating assessment of bodyweight)
• Weak proximal muscles (elicited as difficulty rising from a squatting position)
© SPMM Course 16
Abnormalities on physical investigation:
• Endocrine
• Low concentrations of luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, and oestradiol
• Low T3, T4 in low normal range, normal concentrations of thyroid stimulating hormone (low T3
syndrome)
• Mild increase in plasma cortisol
• Raised growth hormone concentration
• Severe hypoglycaemia (rare)
• Low leptin (but possibly higher than would be expected for bodyweight)
• Cardiovascular
• ECG abnormalities (especially in those with electrolyte disturbance): conduction defects, especially
prolongation of the Q-‐‑T interval, of major concern
• Ipecac (emetic substance) contains emetine an alkaloid that can cause myopathy and fatal
cardiomyopathy which may be reversible in early stages.
• Gastrointestinal
• Hypercholesterolaemia
• Raised serum carotene
• Hypophosphataemia (exaggerated during refeeding)
• Dehydration
• Electrolyte disturbance (varied in form; present in those who vomit frequently or misuse large
quantities of laxatives or diuretics): vomiting results in metabolic alkalosis and hypokalaemia;
laxative misuse results in metabolic acidosis, hyponatraemia, hypokalaemia
• Other abnormalities
© SPMM Course 17
Effects on pregnancy:
Managing bulimia:
Managing anorexia:
© SPMM Course 18
1. engagement
2. weight restoration
3. psychological therapy – cognitive restructuring
4. if needed use of compulsion
Outpatient therapy for anorexia has best chance if
http://apt.rcpsych.org/content/18/1/34
© SPMM Course 19
9. Personality Disorders:
Epidemiology: Personality disorders, as a group, are among the most frequent disorders treated by
psychiatrists (Zimmerman et al., 2005). Epidemiological studies suggest that between 5% and 13% of the
population has at least one personality disorder.
In general, the prevalence of personality disorders among psychiatric outpatients and inpatients is high,
with many studies reporting a prevalence of greater than 50% of samples. Borderline PD is generally the
most prevalent in psychiatric settings. Personality disorders are particularly prevalent among inpatients
with drug, alcohol, and eating disorders. In these populations, prevalence figures for personality
disorder have been reported to be in excess of 70%.
Dissocial personality is the most prevalent category of personality disorder in prison settings. A survey
of a randomly selected sample of one in six prisoners in England and Wales, found that the prevalence of
any personality disorder was 78% for male remand, 64% for male sentenced and 50% for female
prisoners . Antisocial personality disorder had the highest prevalence of any category of personality
disorder, with 63% of male remand prisoners, 49% of sentenced prisoners and 31% of female prisoners. In
Great Britain, the prevalence of antisocial PD in general population is estimated at 0.6% (See Coid et al –
Tables below), with the rate in men (1%) five times that in women (0.2%). Surveys conducted in other
countries report prevalence rates for ASPD ranging from 0.2% to 4.1%. Higher prevalence rates for
personality disorders appear to be found in urban populations, and this may account for some of the
range in reported prevalence.
© SPMM Course 20
Borderline personality disorder is seen in nearly 2% of general population, 10% outpatients, 15-‐‑20%
inpatients and 30-‐‑60% of all personality disorders in some clinical samples. The estimated female: male
ratio is 3:1. It is 5 times more common in first-‐‑degree relatives of borderline patients.
Diagnostic stability:
§ For a long time it was thought that once diagnosed with personality disorder the diagnosis remains
forever, and no change takes place. This pessimism is now shifting largely due to long-‐‑term follow-‐‑up
studies in borderline personality.
§ Longitudinal course of Borderline Personality: 2 important studies to date are the McLean study and
CLPDS study. In McLean Study of Adult Development, the prevalence of five core borderline
symptoms was found to decline with particular rapidity: quasi-‐‑psychotic thought, self-‐‑mutilation,
help-‐‑seeking suicide efforts, treatment regressions, and countertransference problems. In contrast,
feelings of depression, anger, and loneliness/emptiness were the most stable symptoms. The 10 year
follow-‐‑up of McLean sample further clarified this. Chronic dysphoria, intense anger, nondelusional
paranoia, general impulsivity (disordered eating, spending sprees, or reckless driving) remained
relatively common even after 10 years of prospective follow-‐‑up while other features largely abated.
In the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study, abandonment fears and physically self-‐‑
destructive acts were found to be the least stable (rapidly remitting).
§ Results of epidemiological studies suggest a J-‐‑shaped relation between personality and age, with an
initial decrease followed by an increase in some personality disorders in older people.
§ Seivewright & Tyrer reported a 12-‐‑year follow-‐‑up where 178 out of 202 patients were reassessed for
the personality status. The personality traits of patients with the cluster B [flamboyant group -‐‑
antisocial, histrionic] became significantly less pronounced over 12 years, but those in the cluster A
(odd, eccentric group -‐‑ schizoid, schizotypal, paranoid), and the cluster C (anxious, fearful group -‐‑
obsessional, avoidant) became more pronounced.
§ Evidence from the McLean Study of Adult Development suggests that 40% of patients with borderline
personality disorder remit after 2 years, with 88% no longer meeting criteria after 10 years (Silk, KR
Am J Psychiatry 165:413-‐‑415, April 2008).
© SPMM Course 22
Cluster C (anxious, inhibited)
Avoidant personality disorder
§ fears being judged negatively by other people
§ Feelings of discomfort in a group or social settings.
§ may come across as being socially withdrawn
§ Have low self-‐‑esteem.
§ May crave affection but fears of rejection overwhelming.
Dependent personality disorder
§ assumes a position of passivity,
§ Allowing others to assume responsibility for most areas of their daily life.
§ lack self-‐‑confidence,
§ feel unable to function independently of another person,
§ Feels own needs are of secondary importance.
Obsessive-‐‑compulsive personality disorder (1 -‐‑2% prevalence)
§ Difficulties in expressing warm or tender emotions to others.
§ frequently perfectionists
§ often lack clarity in seeing other perspectives or ways of doing things,
§ Rigid attention to detail may prevent them from completing tasks.
§ Some may be hoarders, scrupulous with money
§ May not be able to delegate tasks; workaholics.
Though presence of transient stress-‐‑induced paranoid ideations in borderline PD (DSM) qualifies for
‘quasi-‐‑psychotic’ label, the term ‘quasi psychotic episode’ is in fact used only for schizotypal disorder in
the contemporary classificatory systems. The ICD10 schizotypal disorder is characterised by ‘occasional
transient quasipsychotic episodes with intense illusions, hallucinations and delusion-‐‑like ideas usually
occurring without external provocation’.
Evidence for pharmacological management: (Adapted from Tyrer & Bateman, 2004)
§ Amitriptyline -‐‑ no effect on borderline disorder even if depressed; haloperidol compares better.
§ Flupentixol – some efficacy on self-‐‑harm behaviour.
§ Antipsychotics -‐‑ low dosage these drugs might be effective in the treatment of both schizotypal
and borderline personality disorders
§ SSRIs – reduce aggressive, impulsive and angry behaviour in those with borderline and aggressive
personality disorders.
§ Anticonvulsants and lithium – some effect against affective dysregulation in borderline disorder
and aggressive outbursts in cluster B.
Note that according to NICE Guidelines, pharmacological treatment is not recommended for the features
of Personality Disorder, but it is for co-‐‑morbid illness (such as depression or OCD).
© SPMM Course 23
Type of symptom Preferred drug
treatment
Cognitive/perceptual Antipsychotics
Suspiciousness, paranoid ideation, ideas of reference, magical thinking, stress-‐‑
induced hallucinations
Family history of bipolar I or II or recurrent Family history negative for bipolar I, II and recurrent
depression depression
Adapted from Yatham L, et al. Bipolar Disord 2005: 7 (Suppl. 3): 5–69.
Richardson & Tracy (2015) highlight six core illness-‐‑differentiating themes influencing patient
perspectives on these two conditions:
¬ Public information: for bipolar there is greater public awareness, positive celebrity exposure, more
public information and support groups
¬ Delivery of diagnosis: this is perceived to be taken more seriously and be given more time by staff
than BPD
¬ Illness causes: perceived to be more genetic, and to do with brain ‘wiring’ or ‘chemical’ problem in
bipolar than in BPD
© SPMM Course 24
¬ Illness management: more medication-‐‑orientated in bipolar disorder, better-‐‑established protocols in
comparison with BPD
¬ Stigma and blame: greater stigma for BPD, with accompanying feeling of staff hopelessness and self-‐‑
blame
¬ Relationships with others: a diagnosis of bipolar is accompanied with greater support from family
and friends; its infrequent nature makes it less troublesome and easier to conceal, whereas BPD is
associated with insidious destruction and sabotage of relationships, felt to be ever-‐‑present and cannot
be concealed from relationships
© SPMM Course 25
DISCLAIMER: This material is developed from various revision notes assembled while preparing
for MRCPsych exams. The content is periodically updated with excerpts from various published
sources including peer-reviewed journals, websites, patient information leaflets and books.
These sources are cited and acknowledged wherever possible; due to the structure of this
material, acknowledgements have not been possible for every passage/fact that is common
knowledge in psychiatry. We do not check the accuracy of drug-related information using
external sources; no part of these notes should be used as prescribing information
© SPMM Course 26
Notes prepared using excerpts from
! Baldwin et al (2005) Evidence based guidelines for management of anxiety disorders. J of Psychopharmacology. 19; 567-‐‑
596.
! Beaubrun, G & Gray, GE (2000) A review of herbal medicines for psychiatric disorders. Psychiatric Services 51:1130–
1134, 2000
! Bisson JI. Post-‐‑traumatic stress disorder. BMJ 2007;334:789-‐‑93
! Bisson, J et al. Psychological treatments for chronic post-‐‑traumatic stress disorder: Systematic review and meta-‐‑analysis
The British Journal of Psychiatry 2007; 190: 97-‐‑104
! Castle, DJ & Phillips, KA. Obsessive compulsive spectrum of disorders: A defensible construct? Aust N Z J Psychiatry.
2006; 40(2): 114–120.
! Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth text revision ed.). American Psychiatric Association,
Washington DC 2014
! Fairburn & Harrison (2003) Eating disorders. The Lancet. 361, 9355; 407-‐‑416.
! Gale, C & Davidson, O. Generalised anxiety disorder. BMJ 2007;334:579-‐‑581
! Gunderson, JG. “Borderline Personality Disorder: Ontogeny of a Diagnosis,” Am J Psychiatry 166, no. 5 (May 1,
2009): 530-‐‑539.
! Gunstad J, Phillips KA. Axis I comorbidity in body dysmorphic disorder. Compr Psychiatry. 2003;44:270-‐‑6.
! Heyman, I et al. Obsessive compulsive disorder. BMJ 2006;333(7565):424
! http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/431268_4
! Human Reproduction Update 2006 12(3):193-‐‑207
! Jones, W. R., Schelhase, M., & Morgan, J. F. (2012). Eating disorders: clinical features and the role of the general
psychiatrist. Advances in psychiatric treatment, 18(1), 34-‐‑43. http://apt.rcpsych.org/content/18/1/34
! Magarinos et al, Epidemiology and Treatment of Hypochondriasis, CNS Drugs, 2002; 16(1): 9-‐‑22
! Morris, P & Lloyd, C (2004) Vocational rehabilitation in psychiatry: a re-‐‑evaluation Australian and New Zealand
Journal of Psychiatry 38 (7) , 490–494
! NICE (www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=CG026quickrefguide)—Quick reference guide to NICE guidelines for post-‐‑
traumatic stress disorder
! Phillips KA, Dufresne RG, Jr, Wilkel CS, Vittorio CC. Rate of body dysmorphic disorder in dermatology patients. J Am
Acad Dermatol. 2000;42:436-‐‑41
! Phillips KA, Gunderson CG, Mallya G, McElroy SL, Carter W. A comparison study of body dysmorphic disorder and
obsessive-‐‑compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:568-‐‑75.
! Ross CA, Epidemiology of multiple personality disorder and dissociation. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1991, Sept; 14(3):
503-‐‑17
! Schneier, FR. Social anxiety disorder. BMJ 2003;327:515-‐‑516
! Seivewright, H & Tyrer, P. Change in personality status in neurotic disorders. The Lancet 2002. 359, 9325;2253-‐‑2254.
! Soomro, GM et al. Selective serotonin re-‐‑uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus placebo for obsessive compulsive disorder
(OCD).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 23;(1): CD001765.
! Sumathipala, A. Psychosomatic Medicine 69:889-‐‑900 (2007)
! Taylor, CB. Panic disorder. BMJ 2006;332:951-‐‑955
! Tyrer, P. & Bateman, A. W. (2004) Drug treatments for personality disorder. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10,
389–398.
! Vedat S, Epidemiology of Dissociative Disorders: An Overview, Epidem Research Int 2011
! Weisberg, R. B. (2009). Overview of generalized anxiety disorder: epidemiology, presentation, and course. Journal of
clinical psychiatry.
! Wilson, GT & Shafran, R (2005). Eating disorders guidelines from the NICE. The Lancet. 365, 9453;79-‐‑81.
! Yakeley, J., & Wood, H. (2014). Paraphilias and paraphilic disorders: diagnosis, assessment and management. Advances
in Psychiatric Treatment, 20(3), 202-‐‑213.
! Zimmerman, M et al (2005) The Prevalence of DSM-‐‑IV Personality Disorders in Psychiatric Outpatients. Am J
Psychiatry 162:1911-‐‑1918
© SPMM Course 27