USEPA Hach Method 10267
USEPA Hach Method 10267
USEPA Hach Method 10267
Revision 1.2
December 2015
1.2 The method is applicable in the range from 1.0 to 25.0 mg/L TOC. High TOC values can be
determined by sample dilution.
1.3 This method is equally effective in performance and use to SM 5310-C and EPA 415.3 for the
purposes of regulatory compliance reporting of TOC.
2.2 The CO2 produced from oxidation is detected and quantified using visible spectrum
spectrophotometry at 435 nm.
3.0 Interferences
3.1 The items listed in the Interfering substances table have been individually checked up to the given
concentrations and do not cause interference. The cumulative effects and influence of other ions
have not been determined. Measurement results can be verified using sample dilutions or standard
additions.
4.0 Safety
4.1 The toxicity or carcinogenicity of each reagent used in this method has not been precisely
determined; however, each chemical should be treated as a potential health hazard. Exposure to
these chemicals should be reduced to the lowest possible level. It is suggested that the laboratory
perform personal hygiene monitoring of each analyst using this method and that the results of this
monitoring be made available to the analyst.
4.2 Unknown samples may contain high concentrations of volatile toxic compounds. Sample
containers should be opened in a hood and handled with gloves to prevent exposure.
4.3 This method does not address all safety issues associated with its use. The laboratory is
responsible for maintaining a safe work environment and a current awareness file of OSHA
regulations regarding the safe handling of any chemicals specified in this method. A reference file
of material safety data sheets (MSDSs) should be available to all personnel involved in these
analyses. Additional information on laboratory safety can be found in Sections 16.3 and 16.4.
5.0 Equipment
Note: Brand names, suppliers, and part numbers are for illustrative purposes only. No endorsement is
implied. Equivalent performance may be achieved using apparatus and materials other than
those specified here, but demonstration of equivalent performance that meets the requirements of
this method is the responsibility of the laboratory.
5.1.1 Sample collection bottles – Collect samples in pre-cleaned glass bottles. Pre-cleaned bottles have
been acid rinsed, sealed with foil, and baked at 400 °C for at least 1 hour.
7.2 Hach Company TNTplus TOC, Cat. No. TNT810 and TNT811.
7.3 Hach Company TOC Standard Solutions: 1000 mg/L as TOC (Cat. No. 2791505) or equivalent
7.4.1 If an MDL is required, prepare and measure 7 or more replicates of an MDL stock solution by
diluting 3.0 mL of the 1000 mg/L standard spiking solution (Section 7.3) to 1000 mL. Final
concentration = 3.0 mg/L TOC.
8.1.1 Rinse the sample bottle several times with sample. Fill the bottle completely full.
8.2 Analyze samples as soon as possible. If immediate analysis is not possible, preserve samples by
cooling to <6 oC, and adjust the pH to < 2 with HCl, H2SO4, or H3PO4. Analyze the preserved
within 28 days of preservation.
9.1.1 The analyst shall make an initial demonstration of the ability to generate acceptable accuracy and
precision with this method. This ability is established as described in Sections 9.2 and 9.3. The
laboratory shall, on an ongoing basis, demonstrate through analysis of the ongoing precision and
recovery sample that the analysis system is in control.
9.1.2 Accompanying QC for the determination of TOC is required per analytical batch. An analytical
batch is a set of samples processed during a contiguous 8-hour period. Each analytical batch must
be accompanied by an ongoing precision and recovery sample (OPR), matrix spike sample (MS),
and matrix spike duplicate sample (MSD) resulting in a minimum of four analyses (1 OPR, 1
sample, MS, and MSD).
9.2.1 To establish the ability to detect TOC the analyst shall determine the MDL using the apparatus,
reagents, and standards that will be used in the practice of this method. An achieved MDL less
than or equal to the MDL in Section 13.0 is recommended prior to the practice of this method.
9.2.2 Prepare and measure seven replicates of the MDL standard (Sect. 7.4) according to the procedure
in Section 11.
9.2.3 Using the results of the set of seven analyses, compute the MDL using the following equation:
(∑ x ) 2
∑x 2
−
n
𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 = × 3.14
n −1
where:
n = Number of samples (7)
x = measured concentration of each sample
9.3 Initial precision and recovery (IPR) - To establish the ability to generate acceptable precision and
accuracy, the analyst shall perform the following operations:
9.3.1 Prepare and measure four samples of the IPR standard (Sect. 7.5) according to the procedure in
Section 11.
9.3.2 Using the results of the set of four analyses, compute the average percent recovery (x) and the
standard deviation of the percent recovery (s) for TOC. Use the following equation for calculation
of the standard deviation of the percent recovery:
(∑ x ) 2
s=
∑x 2
−
n
n −1
where:
9.3.2.1 Compare s and x with the corresponding limits for initial precision and recovery in Table 1 (Sect.
17). If s and x meet the acceptance criteria, system performance is acceptable and analysis of
samples may begin. If, however, s exceeds the precision limit or x falls outside the range for
recovery, system performance is unacceptable. In this event, correct the problem, and repeat the
test.
9.4 Ongoing precision and recovery (OPR) - To demonstrate that the analysis system is in control, and
acceptable precision and accuracy is being maintained with each analytical batch, the analyst shall
perform the following operations:
9.4.1 Prepare a 15 mg/L recovery standard with each analytical batch as described in Sect. 7.5.1 and
measure according to the procedure in Section 11. Calculate the percent recovery and compare
this value with the limits for ongoing recovery in Table 2 (Sect. 17). If the percent recovery meets
the acceptance criteria, system performance is acceptable. If the percent recovery falls outside the
acceptance criteria, system performance is unacceptable. In this event, correct the problem, and
repeat the test.
9.4.1.1 Measure a field sample. After measuring the background concentration, spike the sample with a
known concentration of TOC. The spike concentration should be 1-5 times the background
concentration, but still within the reporting range of the method. Prepare a duplicate of this spiked
sample.
9.4.1.2 Measure the spike duplicates and calculate the spike recovery for each sample and the relative
percent difference (RPD) between the two results.
Use the following equation to calculate the spike recovery:
[𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶] − [𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵]
𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 = × 100
[𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆]
where:
|𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶1 − 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶2 |
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 = × 100
𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶1 + 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶2
� �
2
where:
9.4.1.3 Compare the spike recoveries and RPD with the corresponding limits in Table 2 (Sect. 17). If
recoveries and RPD meet the acceptance criteria, system performance is acceptable and analysis of
samples may begin. If recoveries or RPD fall outside the limits, system performance is
unacceptable. In this event, correct the problem, and repeat the test.
9.4.1.4 The laboratory should add results that pass to IPR and previous OPR data and update QC charts to
form a graphic representation of continued laboratory performance. The laboratory should also
develop a statement of laboratory data quality for each analyte by calculating the average percent
recovery (R) and the standard deviation of the percent recovery (sr). Express the accuracy as a
recovery interval from R - 2sr to R + 2sr. For example, if R = 95% and sr = 5%, the accuracy is
85% to 105%. Control charts are acceptable for evaluating process control, but under no
circumstances can the control limits be widened beyond those established in the acceptance
criteria defined in Section 13.
10.2.1 To verify that the instrument is measuring TOC properly, analyze a 3.0 mg/L (Sect. 7.4) and 15.0
mg/L (Sect. 7.5) TOC standard. Results should be within 15 percent of the actual value. Perform
this calibration verification daily while instrument is in use. If the calibration verification standard
result is outside the limit, it is unacceptable. In this event, correct the problem, and repeat the test.
11.0 Procedure
11.1 Instrument Setup – follow the instrument manufacturer’s instructions for instrument setup.
11.2 Preparation
11.2.1 Low Range TNT 810: Pipet 2.0 or 2.5 mL of sample into the reagent vial, use volume as indicated
in manufacturer’s instructions.
11.2.2 High Range TNT 811: Pipet 1.0 mL of sample into the reagent vial.
11.3.1 Place the uncapped reagent vial into the TOC-X5 shaker, raise the fan assembly, and turn the
shaker on. The shaker will run for 5 min.
11.4 Reaction
11.4.2 Invert the indicator vial and screw the other side of the membrane cap to the shaken reagent vial.
Do not invert or shake the assembled vials.
11.4.4 Place the assembled vials into the reactor block, reagent vial down.
11.5 Analysis
11.5.3 Wipe the indicator vial and insert into the spectrophotometer. The instrument reads the barcode,
then selects and performs the correct test. No zero is required. Results are reported in mg/L TOC.
Performance of the method was demonstrated in multi-lab studies comparing the method against
EPA Reference Method SM 5310-C. The method was evaluated in a low ionic strength reference
matrix as well as multiple geographically diverse finished drinking water samples obtained from
both surface water and ground water sources.
15.2 For further information on waste management, consult “The Waste Management manual for
Laboratory Personnel”, and “Less is Better: Laboratory Chemical Management for Waste
Reduction”, both available from the American Society’s Department of Government Relations
and Science Policy, 1155 16th Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036.
16.0 References
16.1 “Protocol for the Evaluation of Alternate Test Procedures for Organic and Inorganic Analytes in
Drinking Water,” USEPA, EPA-815-R-15-007, February 2015.
16.3 “OSHA Safety and Health Standards, General Industry,” (29 CFR 1910), Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976)
18.1.1 Symbols
o
C: degrees Celsius