Chintan Shah - UG190288 - CT2012 - S22
Chintan Shah - UG190288 - CT2012 - S22
Chintan Shah - UG190288 - CT2012 - S22
Tutors:
Japan Shah
Anand Vishwanathan
Priyanka Baghel (TA)
Umang Lapsiwala (TA) Chintan Shah UG190288
Ex-1 Fascinating Deployable Geometries
in Living Organisms
Tutors:
Japan Shah
Anand Vishwanathan
Priyanka Baghel (TA)
Chintan Shah UG190288
Umang Lapsiwala (TA)
Deployment of Peacock’s Tail Wing
The bird lifts its tail to form a fan. The full fan is semicircular, a half-moon expanse.
Once lifted, the tail is shaken sensuously—the motions making the tail look like
ripples of water. The bird also does some legwork—it will go round in neat circles.
And very often, there is no peahen by the time the big bird is done with its.
When courting peahens, Indian and green peacocks unfurl their trains into upright,
semi-circular shapes that can be up to 7 feet wide and 3 feet tall. They are known
to rattle their bodies, so their iridescent feathers catch the sunlight and appear to
shimmer.
Structural member supporting the feather. Wings used by peacock to fly.
Tutors:
Japan Shah
Anand Vishwanathan
Priyanka Baghel (TA)
Chintan Shah UG190288
Umang Lapsiwala (TA)
Foldable Chair
This Chair can be used for different purposes.
There are several advantages of this chair such as :
• Easy transportation: One can easily fold this chair and carry it.
• Easy Useablity: As the chair opens and closes easily.
• Comfortable: It has two arm rest, back rest as well as the cupholder.
• Compact design: It compacts to much smaller dimensions when folded.
• Durable: It can carry load upto 150 kgs and the strength of tube &
Fabric is very high.
Front elevation
Side elevation
Detailed drawings of high density polymer at base Detailed drawings of high density polymer at seat level
35 7 13 25
23 23
27 24
34 35 35
55 55 55 55 55 7 55
7
32 7 7
21 25
21 21
13 13
25 55 7 25
25 24 24
55
25
25
24 7 24
23 55
55
42
60 60
37
23 27 21 41 23
2 0 10 30 60
Note:-
All the dimensions are in mm.
3D Rendered views
Load distribution diagram
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RHxmy7tLY8Jbc_
ZFrSmN4ixZGotLJyg_/view?usp=sharing
Paper tubes
Tutors:
Japan Shah
Anand Vishwanathan
Priyanka Baghel (TA)
Chintan Shah UG190288
Umang Lapsiwala (TA)
Cardboard tubes
Shapes of cardboard tubes
Most paper tubes have a cylindrical shape or
round cross-section, but paper tubes can be
made with:
• Square
• Oval
• Hexagonal
• Triangular
Cardboard Paper rolls are used as a raw material for Big rolls are cut into small rolls The edges are cut off to avoid any irregularity due to
making cardboard tubes. damage.
4 5 6
Small rolls are separated after cutting. Small rolls are loaded on machine for further Paper from different rolls are moved further with
process. the help of rollers.
Manufacturing Process of Cardboard tubes
7 8 9
Strong adhesive is applied on the surface of the paper. Finally the paper stickes around the rod which rotates Labelling is done simulataneously in the process.
as well as move foward.
10 11 12
The cutter at the end cuts the tube in the desired size The Tubes are collected after cutting, the production After manufacturing tubes are packaged for
which is required. rate depends upon the speed of the machine. It varies transportation.
from 75m/min to 160m/min.
Joineries in Cardboard tubes
Image showing joinery between two tubes. Detailed view of joinery between two pipes.
MDF is used for joining multiple tubes
the Cardboard tubes can be use for the overhang, Detailed view of joinery of cardboard tube with timber Timber used as a joinery for multiple tubes.
ceiling/ roof support, etc.
Joineries in Cardboard tubes
Detailed view of joinery of cardboard tube with timber the Cardboard tubes can be use for making trusses.
Source: TU Delft open journals
the Cardboard tubes can be use for making trusses. Detailed view of joinery of cardboard tube with timber Detailed view of joinery of cardboard tube with Metal
Paper Palace in Hanover by Shigeru Ban
Paper log house by Shigeru Ban
Tutors:
Japan Shah Chintan Shah
Anand Vishwanathan UG190288
Origami Tessellations
Variations of accordion fold
Origami Tessellations
Variations of accordion fold
Origami Tessellations
Accordion Fold Radial Folding plate
Scissor Configurations
Undeployed Stage Interim Stage Deployed Stage
55
420
105 595
150 20
Scissor Configurations
Undeployed Stage Interim Stage Deployed Stage
120
295 305
165
170 285
Scissor Configurations
Undeployed Stage Interim Stage Deployed Stage
Deployed Stage
Scissor Configurations
Undeployed Stage Interim Stage
Scissor Configurations
Undeployed Stage Interim Stage Deployed Stage
250
40
335
315
225
60
Scissor Configurations
Scissor Configurations
Undeployed Stage Interim Stage Deployed Stage Plan
240
240
Elevation
90
240
Ex-5 : Case study of a deployable structure
Tutors:
Japan Shah
Anand Vishwanathan
Priyanka Baghel (TA)
Chintan Shah UG190288
Umang Lapsiwala (TA)
Milwaukee Art Museum
Architect: Santiago Calatrava
Area: 142050 Sqft
Completed in: 2001
Building material: Concrete
Design Concept
Architect chose to execute this concept through a pavilion featuring a “vast,
glass-enclosed reception hall” with a “transparent, boat-like prow of unique de-
sign, facing the lake” and a “huge, wing-like sunscreen
Source: www.Solarpedia.com
3D Views
Physical model
• The Wings has very varying length and are at difference of angle of 1 degree. the lon-
gest wing is vertically lifted at 11 degrees following wings are its succesion with differ-
ence of length and angle. 1
Length 32.01 M
• In this model gear system is used to rotate the wings but in real structure hyadraulic Length 31.31 M 2
3
actuators are used. Length 30.63 M
Length 29.94 M 4
Length 29.25 M 5
Length 28.56 M
6
Length 27.87 M 7
Length 27.19 M
8
Length 27.23 M 9
Length 25.81 M 10
Length 25.12 M 11
Length 24.43 M 12
Length 23.75 M 13
Length 23.06 M 14
Length 22.37 M 15
16
Length 21.68 M
Length 20.99 M 17
Length 20.31 M
18
19
Length 19.66 M
20
Length 18.93 M
21
Length 18.24 M
Length 17.55 M 22
23
Length 16.86 M
24
Length 16.18 M
25
Length 15.49 M
Length 14.80 M 26
Length 14.11 M
27
Length 13.42 M 28
Length 12.74 M 29
Length 12.05 M
30
Length 11.36 M 31
Length 10.67 M 32
Length 9.89 M
33
Length 9.30 M
34
Length 8.63 M 35
Length 7.92 M 36
Bibliography
• Quadracci Pavilion - Milwaukee Art Museum - Data, Photos & Plans - WikiArquitectura.
(2022). Retrieved 8 February 2022, from https://en.wikiarquitectura.com/building/
quadracci-pavilion-milwaukee-art-museum/
Scan QR Code or click on the link for animation video
• “The building” (2004). Milwaukee Art Museum.
http://www.mam.org/thebuilding/index.htm.
• “Milwaukee Art Museum” (2004). Santiago Calatrava. http://www.calatrava.com/.
• Auer, J. (2000, March 3). “Entering a new era.” Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Online.
http://www.jsonline.com/enter/finearts/auer/mar00/guide05030300.asp.
• Auer, J. (2000, October 27). “Work on art museum to go on after some galleries open.”
Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Online.
http://www.jsonline.com/enter/finearts/auer/oct00/muse27102600.asp.
• Arbanas, D. et. al. (2001, October 13). “The Milwaukee Art Museum by level.” Milwau-
kee
Journal-Sentinel Online.
http://www.jsonline.com/onwisconsin/arts/oct01/mamlevels050401.asp.
• Arbanas, D. et. al. (2001, October 13). “Virtual building tour.” Milwaukee Journal-Senti-
nel
Online. http://www.jsonline.com/onwisconsin/arts/oct01/MAMtour101301.asp.
• Auer, J. (2001, March 2). “Calatrava has plenty going on underfoot.” Milwaukee Jour-
nalSentinel Online. http://www.jsonline.com/enter/finearts/mar01/mam04030201. https://drive.google.com/ https://drive.google.com/
asp. file/d/1Dx6n-AepT3d62mC7zLv_ file/d/1vu2c31WIRvEW-
• Badreddine, L. (2002). “Winged victory.” Civil Engineering, ASCE, 72(1):34-43. PMYLdZGPaBOX/view?usp=shar- Jac4vAZHWiTfgTUpqdyx/view?us-
“Milwaukee Art Museum” (2004). Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Online. ing p=sharing
• Arbanas, D. et. al. (2001, October 13). “Burke brise soleil – Quadracci pavilion.”
Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Online.
http://www.jsonline.com/onwisconsin/arts/oct01/mamburke101301.asp.
• Auer, J. (2000, January 21). “Museum’s ‘simple’ Calatrava bridge is anything but.”
Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Online.
http://www.jsonline.com/enter/finearts/auer/jan00/bridge23012100.asp.
• Multiframe 2, Version 8.63 (2004). Formation Design Systems, Fremantle, Western
Australia.
Ex-6 Final Design
Tutors:
Japan Shah
Anand Vishwanathan
Priyanka Baghel (TA)
Chintan Shah UG190288
Umang Lapsiwala (TA)
Ex-6 : Final Design Problem
Design process
3000
1714.1
G.L.
5730.6
800
3000 3000
3080
3000
1945
1592.5 1592.5
G.L.
5801.9 5335
Plan
A A'
250 750
0 1750MM
5400
Elevation
3080
1860
GROUND LINE
250 750
0 1750MM
Section with joinery details
JOINERY WITH
WIELDING & L-BRACKET
PULLEY WITH
LOCKING MECHANISM
PERMISSIBLE MEMBER
SIZES ARE
132X132MM SQUARE
HOLLOW SECTION
GROUND LINE
250 750
0 1750MM
Section with joinery details
523 293.6
288.5
401.2
GROUND LINE
250 750
0 1750MM
Stages of Deployment
645
3436.3
5400
Table showing deflection in members 3D View of staad model Loads and defination
Deployed View
Thank you
Chintan Shah
UG190288