5G Resilient Backhaul Using Integrated Satellite
5G Resilient Backhaul Using Integrated Satellite
5G Resilient Backhaul Using Integrated Satellite
Workshop (ASMS/SPSC)
These architectures are illustrated in Figure 1. The implementation of this would require the selection of a
functional split between the terrestrial network gateway and the
satellite earth station, as well as the dynamic deployment of
such a split when the main backhaul changes. Depending on
the split, different control protocols within the core network
may be further adapted to the different characteristics of
respectively the FS link and the satellite link while maintaining
the same connectivity service and applications delivery.
Handover between the FS and the satellite link will need to be
supported, including the management of the dynamic network The consumer devices look similar to a Wi-Fi router. They are
functionality placement and interconnection. connected by co-axial cable to an outdoor antenna which with
modern HTS is likely to be slightly over 74cm. The
B. Overlaying capabilities professional devices tend to look like a small conventional
The satellite links will support multicast to multiple RANs. router and with modern HTS they will tend to use an antenna
This multicast could take different forms such as the following of between 1m and 1.2m.
and shown in Figure 2:
E. Management Systems
i) Live streams of major TV sporting events for onward A modern satellite network is capable of assigning
multicast over the RAN; bandwidth to different sites based on service plans which can
ii) Over the top (OTT) TV content for caching at the define parameters such as data usage, data rates, class of
RAN; service and many similar parameters. The satellite network
NMS allows these parameters to be changed from time to time.
iii) Major software patches such as a smartphone update Integration into modern networks will require an adaptation
for caching at the RAN. layer at the Northbound Interface (NBI) satellite Network
Management System (NMS) to communicate the standard
message primitives.
Typical examples showing the relevant flexibility of
modern broadband satellite service include, but are not limited
to:
Pay as you go packages [8] ;
Backup services [9].
Whilst the satellite NMSs tend to be proprietary and defined by
the manufacturer there are many instances where they have
been integrated into large Operations Support Systems (OSSs).
The ETSI standards body that creates many of the sector
standards has defined a number of standards including [10],
[11].
The TM Forum is a global trade association that helps its
Figure 2: High level multicast architecture members “reduce cost and risk, improve business agility and
grow their business through a wealth of knowledge, tools,
The satellite distribution network will need to follow standards, training and practical advice” [12].
specific cloud network and virtualization standards to integrate They define a Multi-Technology Operations Systems
with 4G multicast solutions and support the network enablers Interface (MTOSI) [13] which is an XML-based Operations
of 5G for multicast. The content can be a mix of that for a System (OS)-to-OS interface suite developed by the TM Forum
wider audience (for example national news) and more localised that is part of the Information Framework-based Standardized
information such tourist information across a smaller area with Interfaces. The Network Management System-to-Element
multiple RANs. Management System communications is a special case and is
The main benefit of this architecture is reducing the service defined by the Multi-Technology Network Management
level latency when accessing rich content cost effectively. (MTNM) standards. MTOSI uses a single interface
infrastructure and applies the same patterns across multiple
technologies.
C. High Throughput Satellites
Today’s High Throughput Satellites (HTS) are capable of The Interface model consists of a generic view which is
delivering broadband capacity for a few hundred thousand end derived and developed at different abstraction levels with
users (e.g. [7]) at sustained speeds in excess of 20Mbps (e.g. different interactions patterns, in order to cover both the OS-
[18]) direct to the end user and in excess of 50Mbps to OS fine grained interactions and the coarse grained services,
professional locations. focusing on network resources management as well as on
services management. An OS in this context is any
The next generation of HTS currently being considered will management system that exhibits Element Management Layer
be able to deliver next generation access speeds (up to (EML), Network Management (NML) and/or Service
100Mbps) to a greater number of end users at the data Management Layer (SML) functionality.
consumption demands predicted for 2020.
The intention of this model can be summarised as:
D. Customer Premise Equipment Reduce the OSS “integration tax”, i.e., the cost of
The current generation of Customer Premise Equipment integrating and maintaining systems;
(CPE) consists of small integrated satellite modem and router.
Enable service providers (via the production of open The curved arrow joining partway along represents the core
management interfaces) to mix and match OSSs from service value chain that the satellite resilient backhaul link
various suppliers based on factors such as price, complements.
quality, and functionality;
The key new relationship will be between the
Increase interoperability by increasing the supply of interconnection service providers and the satellite service
interchangeable components and applications; providers – these may well build on existing relationships
where the satellite service provider already has a connection for
Speed time to market for new services and for services like satellite broadband delivery.
supplier products.
The baseline value chain for delivery of content to the end
In this context MTOSI [13] provides a possible standards- user is somewhat complex with advent of CDNs. Figure 4
based framework for connecting the satellite network NMS shows where a basic Content Delivery Network (CDN) will fit
with the terrestrial network Operations Support Systems in a typical content deliver value chain.
(OSSs). This allows the processes related to site management
to be automated.
Another standard that may well be relevant is that being
developed to provide SDNs – OpenFlow – now being managed Figure 4: A simplified value chain for content delivery with CDN
by the Open Networking Foundation [14]. This will allow
services to be re-routed, added and removed automatically as The content owner will aggregate the content from one or
and when required. more providers. They will host the content on one or more
server farms. The end user buys internet access from their
IV. VALUE CHAINS AND STAKEHOLDERS service provider, amongst other things they will access the
content which may be free or may be paid for. In either case
A. Value chains the end user has a direct relationship with the content owner.
It is important to understand the relationship between the The service provider gets Internet connectivity from one or
different actors in delivering service to the end user. As this more backbone providers (directly or through peering at
integration of satellite and terrestrial networks requires new Internet exchanges). There are two main reasons CDNs are
ways of inter-working it is perhaps most important to consider implemented:
the different organisations involved. The service provider may employ a CDN for
The FI ecosystem is inevitably not yet completely defined. better access to the content and/or to reduce
This ecosystem undergoes continuous change as a consequence backbone costs – this is an access centric CDN.
of steady adaptations, optimizations and innovations taking This will be driven by the telco service demands.
place in the supply chains and in the individual value chains of
The content owner may employ the CDN to
the participating stakeholders. There are three main value enhance their service to the end user – this is a
chains, i.e. consumer Terminal Equipment (TE), Telco services content centric CDN [15]. This will be driven by
and Over-The-Top services. The first of these is not germane the OTT service provider.
to this analysis as the choice and specification of the TE is
driven by the other two rather than the other way round. These reasons are illustrated in Figure 5 below.
The key value chain is the telco services. The following
figure (Figure 3) shows the value chain for supplying services
to end users.
case the mobile service provider. It is likely they will use a needs to be separately reported. Where multicast cached
system integrator to deploy the upgrade the systems at the cell content is delivered the SLA should use language reflecting the
sites. This then suggests a value chain similar to Figure reliable and timely delivery of content to the storage devices
3where the Backbone provider connects directly to the CDN. rather than network uptime. There should be tools to manage
and confirm this delivery. This is more relevant than, say
The end user benefits by improved latency to access the SLAs on meeting bit error rate or latency targets.
content when it is cached. The mobile service provider can
also benefit if they add multicast streaming to their end user
bundle. V. BENEFITS