Status of FY 2023

Transportation Initiatives

City Council Briefing

April 19, 2023

Ghassan “Gus” Khankarli, Ph.D. P.E., PMP, CLTD

Director
Department of Transportation
Presentation Overview
1. Purpose
2. Background
3. Traffic Signal Infrastructure
4. Data Management
5. ATMS Contract
6. Pavement Markings and Signs
7. Service Requests
8. Innovation
9. Next Steps
10. Discussion

2
Purpose

• Provide an overview of current and ongoing transportation

operations initiatives in the City of Dallas including:
• Background and current status of traffic signal
infrastructure
• Status update on the Advanced Traffic Management
System (ATMS) system operation and management
• Pavement markings informational update
• Provide a general overview of other transportation
department activities
• Next steps

3
Traffic Signal Infrastructure

4
Background
• On December 3, 2019, the Department of Transportation (TRN)
presented the “Preliminary Look Into Traffic Signals Infrastructure”
briefing to the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.
• Presentation laid out the average yearly cost to upgrade the
signal infrastructure and the strategic approach to such
upgrades.
• Following that briefing, TRN began the process of modernizing the
upgrading of the traffic signal infrastructure based on the noted
strategic approach.
• On April 19, 2021, TRN presented the “Infrastructure Update: Traffic
Signals, School Flashers & Pavement Markings” to the Transportation
and Infrastructure Committee.

5
Background, continued
• On April 6, 2022, the Department of Transportation (TRN) presented
the “Traffic Signal Infrastructure and Data Management Update”
briefing to the City Council.
• Included two key strategic items: (A) the ATMS contract and (B)
data exchange governance, noting the collaboration with
partnering agencies.
• On August 10, 2022, City Council resolution (CR 22-1571) authorized
the extension of the expiring ATMS contract with Ericsson as the first
step in the process of subsequent amendments to the contract.
• Recent council resolutions acted on agreements with partnering
agencies for the funding or construction of traffic signals.

6
Current Challenges and Opportunities

• Deteriorating physical infrastructure.

• Technological advances and system connectivity,
including Advanced Traffic Controllers (ATCs) and radar.
• Natural disasters and man-made challenges.
• The following slides include pictures of scenarios found in
the field.

7
Example – Corrosion

8
Example – Third Party Damage

9
Example – New Signal

10
Example – New (Central Business District)

11
 Annual Update – Signal Infrastructure
December 2019, 2020, 2021and 2022 Comparison
December December December December
2019 2020 2021 2022

Construction Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

Decade of Signals of Signals of Signals of Signals of Signals of Signals of Signals of Signals

Before 1980 748 54.20% 725 51.60% 696 48.81% 665 46.31%

1980-89 195 14.13% 186 13.24% 178 12.48% 175 12.19%

1990-99 144 10.43% 144 10.25% 139 9.75% 137 9.54%

2000-09 78 5.65% 81 5.77% 80 5.61% 80 5.57%

2010-19 215 15.58% 220 15.66% 219 15.36% 215 14.97%

2020-22 0 0.00% 49 3.49% 114 7.99% 164 11.42%

Total 1,380 100.00% 1,405 100.00% 1,426 100.00% 1,436 100.00%

12
Annual Update – Signal Infrastructure

13
Annual Update – Electronic Components
December 2019, 2020, 2021and 2022 Comparison

Number ATC ATC Radar Radar Detection

of Signals Controllers % Completed Detection % Completed
December 2019 1,380 943 68.33% 326 23.62%

December 2020 1,405 1,109 78.93% 392 27.90%

December 2021 1,426 1,426 100.00% 514 36.04%

December 2022 1,436 1,436 100.00% 551 38.37%

14
Annual Update – Electronic Components

15
Annual Update

16
 Annual Update – Total Signals by CD
Council District December 2019 %Total December 2020 %Total December 2021 %Total December 2022 %Total
1 82.25 5.96% 84.75 6.03% 83.75 5.87% 86.25 6.01%
2 248.5 18.01% 249 17.72% 249 17.46% 249 17.34%
3 46.5 3.37% 50 3.56% 53.5 3.75% 54.5 3.80%
4 65.5 4.75% 66.5 4.73% 69 4.84% 70.5 4.91%
5 43 3.12% 43 3.06% 45.5 3.19% 45.5 3.17%
6 125.5 9.09% 125.5 8.93% 128 8.98% 128 8.91%
7 72.75 5.27% 72.75 5.18% 72.75 5.10% 74.75 5.21%
8 43.5 3.15% 45.5 3.24% 48.5 3.40% 49.5 3.45%
9 64.75 4.69% 67.75 4.82% 68.75 4.82% 68.75 4.79%
10 70 5.07% 71 5.05% 77 5.40% 77 5.36%
11 84.5 6.12% 85.5 6.09% 85.5 6.00% 85.5 5.95%
12 57.5 4.17% 58.5 4.16% 58.5 4.10% 59.5 4.14%
13 104.25 7.55% 107.25 7.63% 107.25 7.52% 107.25 7.47%
14 271.5 19.67% 278 19.79% 279 19.57% 280 19.50%
Total 1380 1405 1426 1436
17
Annual Update-Signals by Decade by CD-Numbers
Council
Before 1980 1980-89 1990-99 2000-09 2010-19 2020-22 Total %Total
District
1 43.5 2.25 1.25 1.5 17.5 20.25 86.25 6.01%
2 155.25 16.75 11.5 14 43.75 7.75 249 17.34%
3 17.25 4.25 7 7.25 7 11.75 54.5 3.80%
4 36.75 4 7.75 1 8 13 70.5 4.91%
5 23 1 2.25 3 9 7.25 45.5 3.17%
6 57.25 26.75 6 7 22 9 128 8.91%
7 35.25 8.5 8.5 3 6.75 12.75 74.75 5.21%
8 7.75 11 7.75 3.75 9.25 10 49.5 3.45%
9 32.5 7.75 2 2 6 18.5 68.75 4.79%
10 15.25 12 13 2 12 22.75 77 5.36%
11 27.5 27.5 11 7 10 2.5 85.5 5.95%
12 1.75 20.75 13.5 16 4 3.5 59.5 4.14%
13 51.5 16 12.5 1 21 5.25 107.25 7.47%
14 160.5 16.5 33 11.5 38.75 19.75 280 19.50%
Total 665 175 137 80 215 164 1,436 100.00%

18
Annual Update-Signals by Decade by CD-Percentage

Council
Before 1980 1980-89 1990-99 2000-09 2010-19 2020-22 Total %Total
District
1 7% 1% 1% 2% 8% 12% 86.25 6.01%
2 23% 10% 8% 18% 20% 5% 249 17.34%
3 3% 2% 5% 9% 3% 7% 54.5 3.80%
4 6% 2% 6% 1% 4% 8% 70.5 4.91%
5 3% 1% 2% 4% 4% 4% 45.5 3.17%
6 9% 15% 4% 9% 10% 5% 128 8.91%
7 5% 5% 6% 4% 3% 8% 74.75 5.21%
8 1% 6% 6% 5% 4% 6% 49.5 3.45%
9 5% 4% 1% 3% 3% 11% 68.75 4.79%
10 2% 7% 9% 3% 6% 14% 77 5.36%
11 4% 16% 8% 9% 5% 2% 85.5 5.95%
12 0% 12% 10% 20% 2% 2% 59.5 4.14%
13 8% 9% 9% 1% 10% 3% 107.25 7.47%
14 24% 9% 24% 14% 18% 12% 280 19.50%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1,436 100.00%
Total 665 175 137 80 215 164 1,436 100.00%

19
Improvements Since December 2019
• Since December 2019, we:
• Added 56 new signals to the system, bringing the total from 1380
to 1436.
• Reconstructed 108 existing signals.
• Completed the upgrades to all the traffic signal controllers in
December 2021.
• Increased the number of locations with radar detection to 38% of the
system.
• These improvements allow the City to better manage the traffic
signals through the ATMS.

20
 Advanced Traffic
Management System
(ATMS)

21
What is ATMS?

• It is an integrated and centralized system that stores and

displays traffic signal data and allows real-time evaluation
of signal operations.
• Utilizes sensors, signage, information, processing, and other
technology from across municipalities and agencies to
provide overarching and shared capabilities.
• It provides real time information about traffic operations at
signalized intersections.

22
What is ATMS?

23
ATMS Components
• The ATMS contract with Ericsson was approved in August 2017 for a
total of $9.876 million covering development and maintenance for
five years, with an option to renew for an additional five years.
• Components include:
• Advanced Traffic Controllers (ATCs) – field computer at each
traffic signal - replaces 1980’s era controller technology.
• Traffic Management System (TMS) – Centralized Computer
Management System for the Traffic Signals - replaces 1992
Computer System.
• Video Management System (VMS) – manages traffic monitoring
cameras - replaces 1990’s era analog technology.
• Asset Management System (AMS) - Integration of City’s Electronic
Work Order and Asset Management System (EWAMS) and
replaces a variety of spreadsheets, databases, and paper forms.

24
ATMS Enhancements
• The full operational value of ATMS relies on robust,
reliable, and secure data exchange.
• The City’s original contract with Ericsson did not
include the Connected Vehicles/Autonomous
Vehicles (CV/AV) module.
• Activation of this module is necessary for future
data management.

25
Data Management and
the Future

26
Data Management and the Future

27
Data Management and the Future

• TRN has a forward-thinking approach to its signal and

streetlight infrastructure covering the following three
components:
• Physical infrastructure component
• Technological and system integration component
inclusive of signal synchronization
• Data exchange component
• TRN is coordinating these efforts with other city
departments including Information and Technology
Services, Data Analytics and Business Intelligence, and
others

28
Data Management and the Future
• Technological advances, public safety and regional
integration requires having our systems updated and
ready
• This necessitates the activation of the CV/AV
component of the ATMS
• Activation of the CV/AV requires data exchange and a
new set of rules that govern this process
• Additional enhancements to the existing system allows
the city to incorporate the management of other
systems such as school flashers, pre-emption
capabilities, transit signal priority, etc.

29
Data Management and the Future

30
Ericsson Contract Amendment Scope

Scope Description

System Integrate school flasher and Battery Back Up Units (BBUs)

Enhancements into ATMS for real time status/data/control

CV/AV Solutions Integrate Kinetic CV to enable real-time signal status sharing

and ATCMTD needed for the ATCMTD SM Wright project, signal pre-
Support emption for emergency response, transit signal priority, and
other applications
Extension of Exercise five year renewal option of original contract from
System Operation November 2022 to November 2027 for Ericsson to continue
and Maintenance operation & maintenance of ATMS system

31
Data Management and the Future
• Data exchange requires technological advances to address (a)
Latency and (b) Security
• In 2013, the U.S. DOT published a data business plan. Key components
include:
• Data governance, quality, standards, privacy, and security
• Oversight and coordination of data management practices
• COD’s cost to activate the CV/AV module encompasses the
following:
• COD initial payment (activation cost)
• COD yearly maintenance cost
• Cost associated to manage 3rd party participation covering:
• Program administration
• Data exchange cost per data byte

32
Current Opportunities - Estimated Cost
Estimated cost for budgeting purposes

33
Data Management – Third Party
• COD will be the administrator of any 3rd party access to COD-
owned data. 3rd party includes internal users such as DFR or DPD
who use a different system/provider that needs to be integrated
into TRN’s Ericsson ATMS system.
• Any 3rd party access request will be required to be through
COD as Ericsson’s contract is with COD and will not have
separate contract with any 3rd party for governance control.
• The City will incur costs to manage the program and the related
usage expenses.
• A long-term funding strategy for 3rd party data & maintenance
costs will be required. This funding strategy could include
monetization of data management.

34
Summary of Opportunities
• Inclusion of school flashers and BBU’s into the ATMS will provide: (a) real
time management and response to potential field issues and (b)
enhanced safety around schools and for the traveling public.
• Activation of the CV/AV module will allow for:
• The ability for our emergency responders to preempt our traffic
signals through a GPS tracked movement
• As per FHWA’s Signal Timing Manual, benefits include:
• Improved response time for emergency vehicles
• Improved safety and reliability for vehicles receiving preemption
right of way
• Improved safety and clarity of right-of-way for other roadway
users
• Positioning the city to accommodate emerging/future technologies
necessary to manage future mobility demands

35
Pavement Markings
and Signs

36
Example – Pavement Markings

37
Pavement Markings Overview
• Approximately 1,700 linear miles of roadways that account for
nearly 8.5 million linear feet of stripes.
• 8,400 crosswalks, primarily at signalized intersections and includes
nearly 3,400 school related locations.
• Approximately 7,000 stop bars and 2,700 pavement legends such
as turning arrows.
• Nearly all street striping is installed by contractors.
• Majority of striping is completed between March and October,
due to weather challenges in the colder months.
• City primarily uses Thermoplastic with a lifecycle of 2 to 5 years
depending on roadway conditions and traffic volumes.
• Currently testing the use of preformed tape for some limited
applications.

38
Pavement Markings Overview

$1.8 Million required to consistently restripe 400 +/- miles every year to maintain
a high level of visible striping within the City to be on an average of 4 year cycle.

$1.8 Million required to consistently restripe 1,200 crosswalks/stop bars for

pedestrian safety and functional operations at school crossings, intersections
and/or street every year to be on an average of 7 year cycle.

Ideal to consistently restripe 35 miles of bike facility to enhance reflectivity and

exclusive protection of cyclists within the City ($40,000 per mile) to be on an
average of 4 year cycle.

39
Pavement Markings – Budget

40
Pavement Markings – Bike Lanes
• Painted bike symbols and signs are recommended every 250 feet

41
Pavement Markings – Bike Lanes
• Green color enhancements are primarily used at specific
designated areas
• Higher cost to implement colored pavement markings

42
Example – Pavement Markings Challenges

43
 Traffic Signs
• Approximately 150,000 traffic signs throughout the city ranging from
regulatory signs (stop signs, speed limits), warning signs (school zone,
pedestrian crossings) and guide signs (street name plates).

• Replacement of 900 signs monthly (maintenance) for a total of 10,800

signs annually.

• Due to increases in aluminum industry wide, the cost for signs have
increased by approximately 300%.

44
Service Requests (SRs)

45
SR Overview
• TRN processed approximately 95,755 SRs in 2021 and 2022
• Parking SRs increased by a total of 57% in 2022 since TRN began
handling additional enforcement duties from DPD
• District Engineering handles the field requests including
neighborhood traffic calming
SR by Division 2021 2022
Dispatched Transportation Calls 16840 15734

District Engineering 2903 3957

Transportation Planning 982 137

Parking Enforcement 15811 24994

Signals and Maintenance 511 436

Signs & Pavement Markings 5659 4891

Street Lighting 1310 1590

Grand Total 44016 51739
46
Innovation

47
Innovation – Real Time Analytics

48
Innovation – Real Time Analytics

49
Innovation – Solar Powered Streetlights

50
Innovation – Parking Meters and DMS
Dynamic Message Sign (DMS)

Ref: Google Map, Accessed 3-31-2023

51
Key Challenges

• Supply chain, resources, and warehousing

• Unauthorized excavation/ borings that
damage underground conduits and electrical
systems
• Theft of wires that render streetlights
inoperable
• Price volatility
• Other

52
Next Steps
• Traffic Signals:
• Council action in early Fall to amend the City’s existing contract with
Ericsson to:
• Migrate the current “Maxview” system to “Kinetic” system, add the
CV/AV option and associated updates to the ATMS system
• Add the needed services for FHWA’s ATCMTD SM Wright Grant
• Continue the internal and external coordination regarding preemption
and transit signal priority
• Traffic Signal Data Exchange Policy:
• Continue to work with other departments to finalize the 3rd party data
exchange policy framework for future council action
• Future Updates and Progress Reports :
• Status update on Vision Zero efforts, Bike Plan, Curb Lane Management,
Traffic Calming Policy, and implementation of the Strategic Mobility plan

53
Discussion

• General questions/comments/feedback

54
 Status of FY 2023
Transportation Initiatives

City Council Briefing

April 19, 2023

Ghassan “Gus” Khankarli, Ph.D. P.E., PMP, CLTD

Director
Department of Transportation