100% found this document useful (1 vote)
221 views

Liquefaction Analysis

This document presents the results of a liquefaction analysis for a site with soil boring BH-1. It includes the standard penetration test (SPT) N-values with depth, corrections made to calculate normalized SPT N1 60-values, total and effective stress values, pore water pressure, and cyclic stress ratios calculated down to a depth of 22.5 meters below ground surface. The critical water table depth is reported as 20 meters. Calculated cyclic stress ratios are all below 1.0, indicating the site has a low risk of liquefaction.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
221 views

Liquefaction Analysis

This document presents the results of a liquefaction analysis for a site with soil boring BH-1. It includes the standard penetration test (SPT) N-values with depth, corrections made to calculate normalized SPT N1 60-values, total and effective stress values, pore water pressure, and cyclic stress ratios calculated down to a depth of 22.5 meters below ground surface. The critical water table depth is reported as 20 meters. Calculated cyclic stress ratios are all below 1.0, indicating the site has a low risk of liquefaction.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS

E h= 0.80 Mw= 7.0 =Magnitude of earthquake


EQ Zone= IV Cd= 0.75-1.0 MSF= 1.193 Pa= 95.76
amax/g= 0.24 Cs= 1.00 Critical Water Table (m)= 20.0 f= 0.88
K(alpha)= 1.00 Cb= 1.05
Yb 17.90 3 4 6 6 6 6

Correction factor (CN)


Effective Overburden
Pore Water Pressure

Cyclic Stress Ratio


Corrected N Value

Stress (σ'v0) kN/m2

Corrected SPT for


Overburden (N1)60
Stress (σv0) kN/m2
Total Overburden

Stress Reduction
C60=Eh.Cd. Cs.Cb

Coefficient (α)

Coefficient (β)
Fines Content

Overburden
Factor (rd)
Depth (m)

Soil Type

(µ) kN/m2
N Value
(FC), %
BH No.

(CSR)
N60

1.50 CI 20 15 0.6750 10.12 26.85 0 26.85 0.989 0.154 1.70 17.21 3.61 1.08
3.00 SM 20 15 0.6885 10.33 53.70 0 53.70 0.977 0.152 1.34 13.79 3.61 1.08
4.50 SM 37 26 0.7021 18.25 80.55 0 80.55 0.966 0.151 1.09 19.90 0.50 1.20
6.00 SC 34 81 0.7156 57.97 107.40 0 107.40 0.954 0.149 0.94 54.73 4.93 1.19
6.00 CL 69 39 0.7156 27.909 107.40 0 107.40 0.95 0.149 0.94 26.35 0.50 1.20
7.50 CL 69 44 0.7292 32.083 134.25 0 134.25 0.94 0.147 0.84 27.10 0.50 1.20
9.00 CL 69 50 0.7427 37.135 161.10 0 161.10 0.93 0.145 0.77 28.63 0.50 1.20
10.50 SC 48 75 0.7563 56.719 187.95 0 187.95 0.89 0.139 0.71 40.49 0.50 1.20
BH-1

12.00 CI 70 97 0.7698 74.671 214.80 0 214.80 0.85 0.133 0.67 49.86 0.50 1.20
13.50 SM 50 100 0.7833 78.335 241.65 0 241.65 0.81 0.127 0.63 49.31 0.50 1.20
15.00 SM 41 100 0.7969 79.689 268.50 0 268.50 0.77 0.121 0.60 47.59 0.50 1.20
16.50 SM 37 100 0.8104 81.044 295.35 0 295.35 0.73 0.114 0.57 46.15 0.50 1.20
18.00 SM 37 100 0.8240 82.398 322.20 0 322.20 0.69 0.108 0.55 44.92 0.50 1.20
19.50 SM 18 100 0.8375 83.753 349.05 0 349.05 0.65 0.102 0.52 43.87 3.23 1.07
21.00 SM 31 100 0.8511 85.107 375.90 7.25 368.65 0.61 0.098 0.51 43.38 4.77 1.16
22.50 SM 39 100 0.8646 86.462 402.75 18.13 384.62 0.57 0.094 0.50 43.14 0.50 1.20
Direct input
KN/m2 By Formula
Codal Input

6 6 5
fines content (N1) 60CS

against Liquefaction
Corrected SPT for

Cyclic Resistance

Cyclic Resistance

Factor of Safety
Ratio (CRR 7.5)

Ratio (CRR)

Status of Rod
(FS)
EQ ZONE amax/g= Cd

Liquefaction Length

22.19 0.245 1.00 0.292 1.9 Non-liquefiable II 0.10 2 0.75


18.50 0.198 1.00 0.236 1.5 Non-liquefiable III 0.16 4 0.75
24.38 0.280 1.00 0.334 2.2 Non-liquefiable IV 0.24 6 0.85
69.97 0.486 0.99 0.571 3.8 Non-liquefiable V 0.36 8 0.90
30.20 0.482 0.99 0.567 3.8 Non-liquefiable 9 0.95
55.50 0.360 0.96 0.412 2.8 Non-liquefiable 10 1.00
56.60 0.370 0.94 0.415 2.9 Non-liquefiable 25 1.00
43.50 0.212 0.92 0.233 1.7 Non-liquefiable
44.90 0.236 0.91 0.256 1.9 Non-liquefiable
71.30 0.496 0.89 0.530 4.2 Non-liquefiable
56.80 0.372 0.88 0.392 3.2 Non-liquefiable
55.88 0.363 0.87 0.379 3.3 Non-liquefiable
54.40 0.349 0.86 0.360 3.3 Non-liquefiable
50.01 0.303 0.86 0.310 3.0 Non-liquefiable
55.20 0.357 0.85 0.362 3.7 Non-liquefiable
52.27 0.328 0.85 0.331 3.5 Non-liquefiable
As Per IS 1893 : 2016 Part-1

6.00 0.95

rd Blake Equation 1996 can be used


amax/g
Sigma'vo Pa f
K(SIGMA)= 0.99 100 95.76 0.75

https://youtu.be/KNI74265Z1k
e FC
2.71828 45

Alfa Bita
5.29187
FC %
Valid if (N1) 60CS<30 30
Pa= 1033.6 gm/cm2 10336 Kg/m2 103.36 KN/m2
Pa= 103.36 KN/m2
CRR7.5
0.4676 0.25 0.222222 0.00042 -0.005 0.4676

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy