Hev Minor August
Hev Minor August
Hev Minor August
NAME : KRITHIK A
A B S T R A C T:
It has always been a topic of discussion that
whether FCEVs have a promising future over the BEVs. BEVs are
currently very well established with an overall new car sales of 5
percent and over 6.8 million in use.
This study aims to determine the efficiency,
Environmental Impact and cost efficiency of FCEVs over BEVs and
some methods to improve the efficiency. The study showed that
FCEV’s lose majority of their efficiency in the process of production
of hydrogen. Also, the mass production process that is used for
hydrogen production creates of lots of environmental footprints
which denies the basic principle of zero pollution which FCEVs
intends to create.
These results suggest that a lot of innovative ideas,
projects and enormous funding on research are required to enhance
the efficiency of the fuel cells are required in order to make FCEV
viable.
Page |3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title No: Page No:
i. Front Page 1
ii. Abstract 2
iii. Table of Contents 3
iv. List of Tables and Figures 4
v. Abbreviations and Acronyms 6
Project of Contents
Section 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1. Introduction to Topic 7
1.2. Need for Topic 10
1.3. Motivation 10
Section 4: Resolution
4.1. Procedure to solve Issue 14
4.2 Detailed Methodology 15
(FIG 1.1)
(FIG 1.2)
(FIG 4.1)
Page |5
(FIG 4.2)
(FIG 5.2)
(Fig 5.1)
LIST OF
ABBREVIATIONS
AND ACRONYMS
ACRONYMS:
1. BEV- Battery-Powered Electric Vehicle.
2. FCEV- Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle.
3. GWh- Gigawatt hours.
4. NPEG-Nano Pyro-Electric Generators.
5. MFC- Microbial Fuel Cell.
6. PEG- Pyro-Electric Generators.
Page |6
1.1.INTRODUCTION TO TOPIC
What is a fuel cell?
A fuel cell uses the chemical energy of hydrogen or other fuels to
cleanly and efficiently produce electricity. If hydrogen is the fuel,
the only products are electricity, water, and heat
PROS:
No vehicle emissions other than water vapour. Fuel economy
equivalent to about twice that of gasoline vehicles.
Hydrogen is abundant, and can be made from renewable
energy
Noise- offers a much more silent and smooth alternative to
conventional energy production.
Environmentally beneficial- greatly reduces CO2 and harmful
pollutant emissions.
Size reduction- fuel cells are significantly lighter and more
compact
Cons:
This space-age technology is expensive to manufacture due the
high cost of catalysts (platinum).
Hydrogen is expensive to produce and not widely available
Acceptable range requires extremely-high-pressure, on-board
hydrogen storage.
Few places to refuel and lack of infrastructure to support the
distribution of hydrogen.
Page |8
PROS:
a. Secondary cells last long and can be used over again and again
due to which production of E-waste can be reduced.
b. Has higher power density
c. Has Higher Discharge Rate
d. Good low-temperature Performance
CONS:
Rechargeable batteries are that they can often become weak
and unpredictable with age which can lead to faster depletion
and lower performance.
High initial costs.
Complete Discharge damages the battery.
Involves risk of bursting.
Extremely sensitive to high temperatures (degrades very
quickly if exposed to heat).
MOTIVATION:
For every problem, there has to be a solution. As an Engineer, it is my
sole responsibility to take on the environmental crisis into account
and find the most efficient solution for it. We are well aware that
petroleum reserves are almost dry and IC engines aren't completely
eco-friendly. As the most common means of transport has always
been Roadways (vehicles with IC engines), this seems to become a
grave issue. To find an alternative solution to this issue, I started to
learn about EVs and FCEVs and finally ended up doing this project.
P a g e | 11
Critical Assessment
The mass production of hydrogen through steam reforming produces lot of Hydrocarbons
Materials used in PEM fuel cell was taken into account. So, they could be changed and efficiency could be increased.
2.2.CONCLUSION DRAWN:
SECTION 4: RESOLUTION
4.1 PROCEDURE TO SOLVE THE ISSUE:
P a g e | 15
OBJECTIVE
Efficiency of FCEVs is low because lot of processes are done even before hydrogen is sent
to the fuel station.
2. EFFICIENCY IN PROCESSES:
Hydrogen is one of the most abundant elements in the atmosphere,
but it is not available gaseous form that is directly usable. It is mostly
available in water and other forms of hydrocarbon.
After extracting it through processes such as Electrolysis and Steam
Reforming, it has to be compressed to a pressure of 790 atm and
then chilled to a temperature of -253k in order to liquefy hydrogen
for transportation and further use.
Pyro-electricity is defined as the ability of select materials to
generate a temporary voltage or current when they are heated or
cooled.
The pyroelectric effect is the change in polarization due to the
change in temperature. Ferroelectric materials are expected to
be strongly pyroelectric because ferroelectric materials have a
P a g e | 17
3. Lack of Infrastructure:
Governments should spend money on funded projects as to
improve and promote the usage of FCEVs. Currently only a total
of 45 Hydrogen gas stations is present in all of United States
that too many located in California.
So, a lot of Gas stations have to installed. But the problem
with this is that the cost of setting a hydrogen gas station is
2 million dollars whereas Electric power station costs only
50 grand dollars.
RESULT:
The study shows that FCEVs have a lot of milestones to
overcome and the overall efficiency of FCEVs is only around
40% and the Efficiency of BEVs stands at 90%. Also the power
used to produce 1 kg of Hydrogen is equal to 61.2 kwh, which if
directly used in BEV could give a range of 380 miles which is
around 6 times higher than that of FCEVs. (fig 5.1)
CONCLUSION:
From the study, it is clear that BEVs will dominate the
roadways for quite a long time until there is a great improvement in
FCEV technology and the rates get significantly lower for commoners
to afford.
.
P a g e | 19
CITATIONS:
Kang, X., Jia, S., Xu, R., Liu, S., Peng, J., Yu, H., & Zhou, X. (2021). Highly
efficient pyroelectric generator for waste heat recovery without auxiliary device.
293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044452745-5.00293-8
Baroutaji, A., Carton, J., Sajjia, M., Ramadan, M., & Olabi, A. G. (2021). Materials in
PEM Fuel Cells. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering.
Published. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815732-9.00134-0
Hoang, A. T., Nižetić, S., Ng, K. H., Papadopoulos, A. M., Le, A. T., Kumar, S.,
Hadiyanto, H., & Pham, V. V. (2022). Microbial fuel cells for bioelectricity