History P1 MS
History P1 MS
History P1 MS
HISTORY 0470/12
Paper 1 May/June 2017
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2017 series for most Cambridge IGCSE ®,
Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
This syllabus is approved for use in England, Wales and Northern Ireland as a Cambridge International Level 1/Level 2 Certificate.
• When marking a response the overall criterion to be considered should be – ‘How good is this response to this question?’
• The Level Descriptor should be used to decide the level into which the quality of the answer fits.
• Exhaustive lists of possible facts are not given in the mark scheme, as there is often a choice of factual knowledge that candidates may use.
• WHERE EXAMPLES OF RESPONSES ARE GIVEN, THESE ARE NOT PRESCRIPTIVE, BUT ARE INTENDED AS A GUIDE. It is not
possible to cover every possible type of response within a levels of response mark scheme and examiners are expected to use their
professional judgement at all times in ensuring that responses are placed in the correct level and given an appropriate mark within that level.
• Marking must be positive. Marks must not be deducted for inaccurate or irrelevant parts of answers. In itself, poor use of historical terminology,
spelling, grammar or handwriting does not affect the mark. The overall quality of the answer to the question should be judged.
• If a candidate reaches a particular level, s/he must be rewarded with a mark within that level. It is not necessary to work through the levels.
• The full range of marks should be used. Do not be afraid to award full marks or no marks. Failure to do this will seriously affect the distribution
of marks. Be prepared to reward candidates who show any level of understanding. The mark scheme starts from basic acceptable response.
Where a band of marks is indicated for a level, these marks should be used with reference to the development of the answer within that level.
Assessment Objectives
(a) recall, description
(b) recall, explanation
(c) recall, explanation and analysis
5(a) What were the main aims of the League of Nations when it was set up in 1920? 4
Level 1 One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for supporting detail 1–4
5(b) Why did the League not include some major powers when it was set up? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘The United States refused to join the League. This was because a majority in the American Senate thought that the
League would drag their country into future disputes and wars.’
5(c) ‘The League of Nations was an effective organisation for preserving peace in the 1920s.’ How far do you agree with 10
this statement? Explain your answer.
A L4 answer will have a minimum of three explanations (2 on one side; 1 on the other). This will be worth a mark of 7.
Fuller explanation of one issue to be given two marks.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘In Upper Silesia a plebiscite was held with British and French troops keeping order. The vote suggested it should be
awarded to Germany despite rural parts voting in favour of Poland. Riots followed. The League suggested a partition, a
decision which was accepted by both sides. The industrial areas came to Germany. The League safeguarded rail links and
made arrangements for water and power supplies.’
OR
‘Vilna had been made the capital of newly created Lithuania. The city was seized by a Polish army. The League asked the
Polish army to withdraw but it refused. The matter was passed to the Conference of Ambassadors. France refused to act
against Poland, seeing them as a future ally.’
6(a) What was the ‘Greater Germany’ that Hitler aimed to establish? 4
Level 1 One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for supporting detail 1–4
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘In 1935 the League of Nations held the promised plebiscite in the Saar. The vote was an overwhelming success for Hitler
with around 90% voting to return to German rule. This was a real morale booster for Hitler and was achieved by peaceful
means.’
6(c) ‘The policy of appeasement made sense at the time.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer. 10
A L4 answer will have a minimum of three explanations (2 on one side; 1 on the other). This will be worth a mark of 7.
Fuller explanation of one issue to be given two marks.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘Britain and France were not ready to fight as they were militarily weak and were still coping with the impact of the Great
Depression. Appeasement afforded them time for rearmament.’
OR
‘Appeasement was morally wrong. Hitler was a bully and by appeasing him they were giving in to a bully. They allowed Hitler
to go unchallenged leaving Czechoslovakia to its fate. Appeasement was cowardly.’
e.g. ‘It was popular as the people of Britain and France wanted peace.’
‘It ensured that Germany remained a strong anti-Communist state.’
‘It ensured that there was valuable time to rearm.’
‘It allowed the harshness of Versailles to be rectified.’
OR
‘Appeasement was morally wrong.’
‘It was based on a misjudgement that Hitler was rational.’
‘It prevented Hitler being stopped.’
‘It led to the Nazi-Soviet Pact.’
‘It allowed Germany to grow more powerful.’
‘Britain gave away a strong ally in Czechoslovakia.’
e.g. ‘It was the wrong policy to follow as it gave opportunities for others.’
Level 1 One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for supporting detail 1–4
e.g. ‘The country was run by the Hungarian Communist Party which only had 17% of the vote.’
‘The prevention of freedom of speech.’
‘Soviet control was repressive and strict.’
‘There was censorship.’
‘The Soviet secret police were hated.’
‘They did not like Russian street signs.’
‘Education was restricted.’
‘Religion was banned for being subversive.’
‘Industrial production and food were sent to Russia.’
‘The standard of living dropped.’
‘Food was in short supply.’
‘The thousands of Russian troops in Hungary were unpopular. They had to pay for the troops.’
‘They were unhappy with hard-line leaders – Rákosi and Gerö.’
‘Political opponents were arrested / executed.’
7(b) Why were the Soviets concerned about events in Hungary in 1956? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘Khrushchev was not prepared to accept Hungary leaving the Warsaw Pact to become a neutral country. He could accept
some changes but not Hungarian neutrality. If Hungary left the Soviet bloc it was feared other countries might follow. The
protective buffer of friendly countries built up by Stalin might fall apart leaving the Soviets exposed.’
7(c) ‘The Berlin Wall was built in 1961 to prevent mass migration.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain 10
your answer.
A L4 answer will have a minimum of three explanations (2 on one side; 1 on the other). This will be worth a mark of 7.
Fuller explanation of one issue to be given two marks.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument cannot be awarded more than 8.
Level 3 One-sided explanation OR one explanation of both sides 5–6 marks 4–6
e.g. ‘The erection of the wall by the East was to prevent the mass movement of people from East to West. Nearly 2.6 million
East Germans had left for West Berlin or West Germany between 1949 and 1961. Many were skilled people who were
needed in East Germany.’
OR
‘Politically the mass numbers leaving the communist regime made it look unpopular. In the context of the Cold War this was
negative propaganda as they competed with the capitalist West. Enemies of Communism were arguing that life must be so
bad they had to be walled in to prevent people escaping.’
e.g. ‘It was built to prevent the educated young people of the East moving to the West.’
‘It was to ensure the East did not lose its skilled workforce.’
‘To stop the impression that life was better under capitalism.’
‘It was built to end free access to the West.’
8(a) Describe how Saddam Hussein dealt with the Kurds between 1987 and 1991. 4
Level 1 One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for supporting detail 1–4
8(b) Why was Saddam Hussein able to become President of Iraq in 1979? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘As President Bakr grew older and suffered from increasing health problems, Saddam became ruler of Iraq in all but
name. In 1979, amid circumstances that almost certainly involved threats and bullying, Bakr was encouraged to resign in
favour of Saddam who achieved the Presidency in a final bloodless move.’
e.g. ‘He had been able to remove any who posed a threat.’
‘He was supported by individuals in the Revolutionary Command.’
‘He had shown he could deal with foreign issues.’
‘He had improved the lives of ordinary people.’
‘The aging, ailing President Bakr was encouraged to resign.’
‘He used his influence to appoint family and friends to important positions.’
8(c) ‘The Iran–Iraq War of 1980–88 was a success for Iraq.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your 10
answer.
A L4 answer will have a minimum of three explanations (2 on one side; 1 on the other). This will be worth a mark of 7.
Fuller explanation of one issue to be given two marks.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument cannot be awarded more than 8.
Level 3 One-sided explanation OR one explanation of both sides 5–6 marks 4–6
e.g. ‘Saddam Hussein claimed that it had been a glorious victory for Iraq. He had halted the spread of the Islamic Revolution
that had affected Iran. He had prevented Khomeini from toppling his regime and an imposing monument was erected in
Baghdad to recognise his achievement.’
OR
‘Economic damage was considerable. Iraq had been transformed from one of the richest countries in the world to a bankrupt
state. It owed billions in foreign debt and annual oil revenues had more than halved. Investment in social projects such as
housing, schools and hospitals had to make way for austerity.’
11(a) In what ways was the Nazi Party affected by the Munich Putsch? 4
Level 1 One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for supporting detail 1–4
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘Following the burning down of the Reichstag, Hitler immediately claimed it was proof of a Communist plot. He persuaded
Hindenburg to issue an emergency decree which allowed the police to arrest Communists, thus removing a threat to his quest
to consolidate his power.’
e.g. ‘Hitler claimed it was proof of a Communist plot against the state.’
‘Hitler took the opportunity to whip up public fear against Communists.’
‘One theory was the fire was started by the Nazis so as to be able to blame the Communists.’
‘It gave him the opportunity to persuade President Hindenburg to issue an emergency decree.’
‘The decree curbed personal freedoms and increased police powers.’
‘It gave the opportunity to arrest Communists and thus remove a threat to the Nazis.’
‘He was able to ban the Communist Party.’
‘He closed down Communist newspapers.’
11(c) ‘The use of mass rallies was the main reason the Nazis were able to increase support up to 1932.’ How far do you 10
agree with this statement? Explain your answer.
A L4 answer will have a minimum of three explanations (2 on one side; 1 on the other). This will be worth a mark of 7.
Fuller explanation of one issue to be given two marks.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument cannot be awarded more than 8.
Level 3 One-sided explanation OR one explanation of both sides 5–6 marks 4–6
e.g. ‘The Nazi calendar was filled with special anniversaries which provided opportunities for celebration through marches,
parades, torch-lit processions, speeches and pageantry. The most spectacular was at Nuremberg in September. These rallies
emphasised power, control and order and brought colour to people’s lives.’
OR
‘The work on propaganda by Goebbels gained the Nazis support. He organised poster campaigns with simple slogans to
highlight Nazi ideas to solve Germany’s problems. He edited a network of Nazi newspapers and he gave speeches which
were almost equal to Hitler’s in their appeal to many Germans.’
e.g. Rallies
‘The most spectacular rallies were at Nuremburg. These were torch-lit processions, speeches and pageantry.’
‘Uniforms were worn.’
‘They were colourful and exciting.’
‘Hitler spoke at them.’
Other reasons
‘The Nazis had a series of newspapers across the country.’
‘Hitler was a great orator.’
‘The Nazis produced films to present their ideals and values.’
‘Goebbels organised a propaganda campaign.’
‘The Nazis had ideas for dealing with unemployment.’
‘The Nazis had answers for the problems of the Depression.’
‘The SA and SS gave the impression of order and discipline.’
‘Many supported the Nazis because they opposed the Communists.’
‘The Nazis organised soup kitchens.’
12(a) Describe the experiences gained from membership of the Hitler Youth. 4
Level 1 One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for supporting detail 1–4
12(b) Why was the education of young people in German schools changed by the Nazis? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘All pupils had to learn about the history of Germany and how weak government and the Jews were responsible for the
punishing Treaty of Versailles. This was to ensure that true Nazis were created. They would be encouraged to hate Jews and
look to a strong government – the Nazis.’
e.g. ‘All German schools were now run by the Nazi state.’
‘Teachers had to give a loyalty oath to Hitler.’
‘The curriculum was changed to ensure Nazi ideas and racial beliefs were reflected in the teaching.’
‘Religious education was removed from the curriculum.’
‘Greater emphasis was placed on sport and physical education.’
‘To produce loyal Nazis.’
‘To produce loyalty towards Hitler.’
‘To increase hostility towards Jews.’
‘To make pupils fitter.’
‘To prepare boys for the army.’
‘To prepare girls for motherhood.’
12(c) How successful were Nazi policies for German industrial workers? Explain your answer. 10
A L4 answer will have a minimum of three explanations (2 on one side; 1 on the other). This will be worth a mark of 7.
Fuller explanation of one issue to be given two marks.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument cannot be awarded more than 8.
Level 3 One-sided explanation OR one explanation of both sides 5–6 marks 4–6
e.g. ‘The ‘Strength through Joy’ programme was to provide opportunities to improve leisure activities for low-paid workers. It
subsidised sea cruises, holidays, built health resorts and spas and ran coach tours. It also provided cheap sports facilities
such as sailing and skiing.’
OR
‘The idea to encourage people to save to buy their own Volkswagen was a con trick. By the time war broke out in September
1939, not a single customer had taken delivery of a car. The factory was converted to war production and none of the money
paid in advance was refunded.’
e.g. Successes
‘Unemployed men were used to build roads, autobahns, houses, hospitals and schools.’
‘Conscription was re-introduced.’
‘The ‘Beauty of Labour’ organisation improved working conditions.’
‘The ‘Strength through Joy’ programme provided opportunities to improve leisure activities for low-paid workers.’
Limitations
‘Married women were encouraged to give up their jobs.’
‘Jobs were created by the idea of self-sufficiency.’
‘Labour Service Corps were used.’
‘Jews were driven out of their jobs.’
‘The ‘own a Volkswagen’ was a con trick.’
‘The cost of living increased.’
‘Trade unions were banned.’