0470_s21_ms_13
0470_s21_ms_13
0470_s21_ms_13
HISTORY 0470/13
Paper 1 May/June 2021
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2021 series for most Cambridge
IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
• When marking a response the overall criterion to be considered should be – ‘How good is this
response to this question?’
• The Level Descriptor should be used to decide the level into which the quality of the answer fits.
• Exhaustive lists of possible facts are not given in the mark scheme, as there is often a choice of
factual knowledge that candidates may use.
• WHERE EXAMPLES OF RESPONSES ARE GIVEN, THESE ARE NOT PRESCRIPTIVE, BUT
ARE INTENDED AS A GUIDE. It is not possible to cover every possible type of response within
a levels of response mark scheme and examiners are expected to use their professional
judgement at all times in ensuring that responses are placed in the correct level and given an
appropriate mark within that level.
• Marking must be positive. Marks must not be deducted for inaccurate or irrelevant parts of
answers. In itself, poor use of historical terminology, spelling, grammar or handwriting does not
affect the mark. The overall quality of the answer to the question should be judged.
• If a candidate reaches a particular level, s/he must be rewarded with a mark within that level. It is
not necessary to work through the levels.
• The full range of marks should be used. Do not be afraid to award full marks or no marks. Failure
to do this will seriously affect the distribution of marks. Be prepared to reward candidates who
show any level of understanding. The mark scheme starts from basic acceptable response.
Where a band of marks is indicated for a level, these marks should be used with reference to the
development of the answer within that level.
Assessment Objectives
1(a) Describe the part played by Garibaldi in Italy in the years 1848–49. 4
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
1(b) Why was there much support for liberalism in Europe in 1848? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘There was a lot of support for liberalism because of poor government at
the time and industrialisation. Industrialisation had strengthened the middle
classes who believed that there needed to be improvements. The middle
classes had become more important but they lacked political power which
was still in the hands of the old traditional rulers. They wanted republican
governments elected by some of the people and more economic and
political freedoms such as freedom of the press and free speech.’
e.g. ‘There was much support for it because people thought that big
changes were necessary and so they turned to liberalism.’
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I think the conservatives were stronger because they defeated the
revolution. After the establishment of a republic, the conservatives gradually
regained control and were strong enough to put down the June Days
uprising. After that there was a conservative reaction leading to the election
of Louis Napoleon and then the ending of the Republic and Napoleon
becoming Emperor. This shows that the old system had been restored and
the conservatives victorious.’
OR
e.g. ‘The radicals were stronger because they had a lot of success. In
February they were able to get rid of the hated Prime Minister Guizot,
overthrow Louis Phillipe and set up a republic. In Paris people flooded onto
the streets demanding reforms. National Workshops were set up to provide
work for the unemployed. These achievements show how powerful the
radicals were.’
e.g. ‘The radicals were strong in Paris but had little support in the French
countryside.’
‘The conservatives defeated the June Day risings.’
‘When Napoleon became emperor it showed that the conservatives were
stronger.’
‘The radicals were able to get rid of Louis Phillipe and the monarchy.’
‘The radicals set up the National Workshops.’
‘The election results of April showed that the radicals did not have a lot of
support.’
‘Napoleon’s victory in the December elections showed how weak the
radicals were throughout France.’
e.g. ‘I think the conservatives were stronger because they were the ones
who had the best ideas and they won.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘It was set up because of events that were happening at the time in
Germany.’
2(c) How far was German unification brought about by the policies of 10
Bismarck? Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I disagree with this. There were more important long-term causes such
as German nationalism and liberalism, the long-term decline of Austria, and
the economic and military strength of Prussia. Without these, unification
would not have happened. Bismarck operated in a context created by these
factors. For example, Prussia was economically strong before Bismarck. It
led the Zollverein and its industrial production was growing much faster than
Austria’s. This gave Bismarck the strength that was needed for Prussia to
become the dominant state in Germany.’
OR
3(a) Describe the events between 1854 and 1861 known as ‘Bleeding 4
Kansas’.
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
3(b) Why was the Ku Klux Klan founded soon after the Civil War ended? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘The Ku Klux Klan was founded to restore white supremacy in the
South. This had been weakened by emancipation, the defeat of the South in
the Civil War and Reconstruction. Its aim was to use intimidation and
murder to drive black Americans out of politics and to stop people
supporting the Republicans. It aimed at destroying Republican
administrations that had been set up in the South and to restore the rights of
white Americans, their control of the black labour force and to restore racial
subordination in all aspects of Southern life.’
e.g. ‘It was founded because of the situation in America after the end of the
Civil War. Some people thought that the situation made the KKK necessary.’
3(c) How far was Lincoln to blame for the fact that he was hated and feared 10
in the South? Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I think this was Lincoln’s fault. The main reason that he was hated and
feared in the South was his opposition to slavery which he made quite clear.
For example, he opposed the creation of new slave states. It is not
surprising that the South regarded him as an abolitionist and feared him.
Slavery was crucial to the economy and way of life of the South, and people
in the South resented any hint that the North would interfere with it. This can
be seen by the fact that in the presidential elections Lincoln did not win a
single state in the South, and soon after his victory southern states began to
secede from the Union.’
OR
‘This was not Lincoln’s fault and there was not much he could have done
about it. He did his best not to upset the South over slavery, for example, he
often promised to enforce fugitive slave laws as president. In his speech
when he became president, he promised not to interfere with slavery and he
did not think that the federal government could abolish slavery in states
where it already existed. In fact, with Lincoln as president, slavery in the
South would have probably been secure, so it was not his fault that the
South feared him.’
e.g. ‘I think it was Lincoln’s fault. His views were not liked in the South and
so they were bound to hate him.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘I think the main reason was Britain was afraid that Germany was going
to invade France. The Entente Cordiale had brought Britain and France
closer and in 1911, during the Agadir Crisis, Britain had promised to help
France if it was invaded by Germany. Britain was very worried by the idea of
Germany quickly overrunning France as it had done in 1870. Germany
controlling France and the English Channel would be a great threat to
Britain. So Britain went to war to defend France.’
e.g. ‘This was because Germany refused to remove its troops from
Belgium.’
‘This was because Germany had invaded Belgium.’
‘Germany was clearly threatening France and so Britain had to go to war.’
‘Tensions between Germany and Britain had been growing for years and
German aggressiveness in Belgium was the crucial trigger for Britain to
declare war on Germany.’
‘Many people in Britain felt that they could not leave Belgium fighting
Germany alone.’
‘The Treaty of London said that Britain had to safeguard Belgium’s
neutrality.’
‘Britain did not want Germany to grow any more powerful.’
e.g. ‘Britain went to war because it had no choice. If it did not, then the
situation would get worse.’
4(c) Who was more to blame for the outbreak of war in 1914, Germany or 10
Russia? Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I think Germany was more to blame. It had made the situation in
Europe very tense by its massive increase in armaments and its rivalry with
Britain. Giving a ‘blank cheque’ to Austria was disastrous because it
encouraged Austria to force a war with Serbia which started the events
leading to a major European war. Without Germany’s support, Austria would
not have gone so far as the ultimatum to Serbia. Germany’s support for
Austria also alarmed Russia which then mobilised.’
OR
e.g. ‘I think Russia was to blame. Its support for Serbia encouraged the
Serbs to cause trouble for Austria. It is also important to remember that
Russia mobilised first. This is what turned a conflict between Austria and
Serbia into a major European war. Once Russia had mobilised, Germany
had to act fast before it was surrounded from the East and the West.’
e.g. ‘I think they were both to blame. They both did things that made the war
more likely.’
5(a) Describe how the League dealt with the dispute over the Aaland 4
(Aland) Islands.
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
e.g. ‘The League rejected Finland’s claim that the issue of the Aaland
Islands was outside the League’s area of responsibility.’
‘The League investigated the claims of Finland and Sweden.’
‘The League supported the claims of Finland to the islands.’
‘The League also built in some safeguards, e.g. Finland could not fortify the
islands in any way.’
5(b) Why were some major powers not members of the League? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘One reason for this was because they did not want to become a
member. The USA decided not to join. It was worried that it would take away
some of the country’s independence and its right to make its own decisions
in foreign policy. It was also worried that the League would drag it into
European wars and disputes just as it had been in the First World War.
Hitler did not want Germany’s actions to be restricted by the League,
especially since he wanted to destroy the Treaty of Versailles, and so he
took Germany out of the League.’
e.g. ‘Some countries like the USA and Nazi Germany did not want to be
members.’
‘Some countries such as Germany were not allowed to join at the start of the
League of Nations.’
‘Japan left the League when it criticised its actions in Manchuria.’
‘The Soviet Union was not allowed to join at first for ideological reasons – it
was communist.’
‘The Soviet Union did not want to join at first because members such as
Britain and France had supported the counter-revolutionaries in Russia
during the Civil War.’
‘Italy left when the League imposed sanctions on it because of its invasion
of Abyssinia.’
e.g. ‘This was because they did not want to join because they disagreed
with it.’
5(c) ‘Britain was responsible for the failure of the League in the 1930s.’ 10
How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I do not agree with this. I think the League had an impossible job to do,
especially because of the Depression. This led to extremists like Hitler
coming to power around the world. These leaders were nationalists and had
aggressive foreign policies such as Italy in Abyssinia, Japan in Manchuria
and Germany across Europe. The Depression also made the members of
the League more reluctant to use economic sanctions because they wanted
to keep all the trade they could. So at the moment when the League’s action
was needed most, the power of the League declined.’
OR
e.g. ‘I agree with this statement. Britain was a leading member of the
League and yet it really provided no proper leadership for the League. In
fact, in many areas such as dealing with Germany’s aggression, Britain
ignored the League and dealt with Germany directly. It appeased Germany
and let it get away with taking over country after country. It also went behind
the League’s back and came up with a secret deal with France, the Hoare-
Laval Pact, to appease Italy. Britain did not want to upset Mussolini and was
worried about driving him into the arms of Hitler. This is why Britain let the
League down badly.’
e.g. ‘The Depression made the job of the League much harder.’
‘Aggressive foreign policies of countries like Japan made the task of the
League much harder.’
‘Many members of the League were to blame. This can be seen with the
failure of the Disarmament Conference.’
‘France was just as much to blame. For example, it was reluctant to stand
up to Italy.’
‘Without a permanent army, the League never had a chance of success.’
‘The USA was not a member of the League and this seriously weakened it
in the 1930s.’
‘Britain was one of the two leading countries in the League and so must
have a lot of the responsibility.’
‘Britain often worked outside the League. This damaged its international
standing.’
‘Britain deceived the League through the Hoare-Laval Pact.’
‘Britain was reluctant to act against Japan because it had colonies in the Far
East.’
e.g. ‘I do not agree with this. I think lots of countries were to blame for the
failure of the League.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
e.g. ‘Many in Britain thought that Germany had a right to do what it wanted
in the Rhineland.’
‘Britain and France did not want to risk a war over territory that already
belonged to Germany.’
‘Hitler promised a non-aggression pact and so Britain and France did
nothing.’
‘France had great economic problems at the time and could not afford to do
anything.’
‘Public opinion in France was strongly against the French government doing
anything.’
‘At first, France hinted at taking military action but then did nothing.’
‘Britain did not have the military resources to do anything and so did
nothing.’
6(b) Why were the failures of the League of Nations in the 1930s important 6
to Hitler?
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘They were important to Hitler because they showed him that the
League would not stand up to countries who had aggressive foreign
policies. This was clear when Japan got away with invading Manchuria. This
became even clearer with Italy’s invasion of Abyssinia which was much
closer to Europe. The League showed it was incapable of taking effective
action with each country more concerned about its own national interests
than what was best internationally. Hitler decided that if he went on to
destroy the Treaty of Versailles, the League would not take any action
against him.’
e.g. ‘The League had shown that it could not take any meaningful action
against aggressors.’
‘Both Japan and Italy had got away with invading other countries. This was
an important lesson for Hitler.’
‘The League showed that individual members put themselves first and so
the League could not agree on any strong action.’
e.g. ‘They showed that the League was a failure and he did not have to
worry about it.’
6(c) Are you surprised that Germany invaded Poland in September 1939? 10
Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I am very surprised. By this time both Britain and France realised that
Hitler wanted to conquer the whole of eastern Europe and was not going to
stop at Czechoslovakia. In March, they gave Poland a guarantee that if it
was attacked they would come to its aid. Hitler should have realised from
this that Britain and France were not going to let him get away with any
more aggression. Hitler did not want a war with Britain and so I am surprised
he took the risk of invading Poland.’
OR
e.g. ‘I am not surprised at all because of the Nazi-Soviet Pact. Germany and
Russia agreed to divide Poland between them. This meant that Hitler knew
that if he invaded Poland he would not be attacked by Russia. If Britain went
to war against him, he would not have to fight a war on two fronts. Anyway,
the actions of Britain and France so far taught Hitler that they were unlikely
to do anything if he invaded Poland.’
e.g. ‘Britain and France promised to come to Poland’s aid if it was attacked.’
‘By this time, Britain and France were determined not to let Germany get
away with any more aggression and conquest.’
‘The Nazi-Soviet Pact made invading Poland a lot less risky.’
‘Hitler wanted to reverse the Treaty of Versailles which had created Poland.’
‘Poland included land that had belonged to Germany before 1919.’
e.g. ‘I am not surprised at all because Hitler was an aggressive leader who
wanted to conquer country after country.’
7(a) What was the purpose of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 4
(NATO)?
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
e.g. ‘It was designed so that the member states agreed to defend each other
if one of them was attacked.’
‘Its purpose was for the West to stand up to the Soviet Union.’
‘It was to protect the West against Soviet invasion.’
‘It was to protect countries in Western Europe, after the Soviet Union had
taken over countries in Eastern Europe.’
‘It allowed the USA to have missile sites close to the Soviet border.’
‘Its purpose was to stand up to communism.’
7(b) Why did the USSR and the West disagree about what to do with 6
Germany after the end of the Second World War?
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘They disagreed because the USSR was worried about being attacked
again by a revived and strong Germany. Russia had been attacked by
Germany and an enormous amount of damage had been done there. Stalin
thought that the Soviet Union was under threat from the West and this is
why he developed a series of communist states in Eastern Europe as a
barrier against the West. If Germany became industrially and militarily
strong again, it could threaten the Soviet Union. This is why he wanted to
strip Germany of its industry so that it could not recover.’
e.g. ‘The USSR thought Germany should pay huge reparations for invading
Russia.’
‘The USSR wanted more reparations from Germany to help it rebuild after
the war.’
‘The West regarded the USSR as a hostile power and wanted a strong
Germany to stop communist expansion.’
‘The USSR did not want to be threatened by a strong Germany again.’
‘Truman took a tougher line over Germany than Roosevelt.’
e.g. ‘They disagreed because they had completely different ideas about
Germany. They both thought Germany was crucial to their idea of what a
future Europe should look like.’
7(c) ‘The USA offered the Marshall Plan to European countries to help its 10
own economy.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain
your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I agree with this. The Marshall Plan was really to help the USA. The
idea behind lending European countries enormous sums of money was that
as their economies recovered, they would buy goods from the USA. This
would help US industry and create jobs in the USA because there would be
a great demand for US exports. If Western Europe remained poor, it would
not be able to trade with the US much.’
OR
e.g. ‘I disagree with this. I think the Marshall Plan was all about protecting
Western Europe from the spread of communism. Truman was worried that if
Western Europe remained poor, there might be uprisings and support for
communism. He was worried that communism might spread across Western
Europe. The way to stop this was to help Western Europe recover
economically. If people there had jobs and were gradually feeling richer,
they would have no reason to support communism.’
e.g. ‘I think the USA offered the Marshall Plan because it thought it was a
good idea and would help everybody.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘The Iran-Iraq War was important to the West because it did not want
Iran or Iraq to become dominant in the Middle East. Neither of these two
countries was particularly friendly with the West and so they did not want
either of them to be all-powerful. For example, if Iran had won it could have
put an Islamic revolutionary government into Baghdad. This would have
been disastrous for the West and would have threatened the West’s allies in
the region such as Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. This would have made the
whole area unstable and could have left the West without any allies there.
This is why the West did give Iraq arms and money – to stop Iran winning
the war.’
e.g. ‘It was very important to the West because it had a great deal of interest
in what went on there.’
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I do not think this was very surprising. The Shah had become very
unpopular because of his repressive rule. He used secret police and
informers and his opponents were tortured and executed. The leading
enemy of the Shah was Ayatollah Khomeini, a Muslim cleric, who was in
exile. At this stage, Khomeini focused on the grievances of the people such
as the repressive rule and the great inequalities of wealth, but he really
aimed at setting up an Islamic republic. When he returned to the country, a
popular revolution overthrew the Shah and in 1979 a referendum was held
to turn the country into an Islamic republic. This is not surprising because it
is what Khomeini had been planning all the time.’
OR
e.g. ‘I think this was surprising. Most of the opposition to the rule of the Shah
had built up over his repressive policies that had little to do with religion. His
rich life style was compared with the poverty of many Iranians and he spent
a lot of the country’s wealth on weapons. This all led to massive
demonstrations in Iran. Although Khomeini was an important figurehead, he
was in exile and did not return to Iran until after the Shah and his family had
fled. Many of the protests were about issues that had little to do with religion
and most people were not demonstrating for an Islamic republic. So it was
surprising when Khomeini set one up in 1979.’
e.g. ‘Many of the grievances of the Iranian people were to do with poverty
and repressive rule.’
‘Khomeini deliberately did not focus on religious issues.’
‘Khomeini always wanted an Islamic republic.’
‘Khomeini was in exile and not directly involved in the anti-Shah
demonstrations.’
‘An overwhelming majority of the Iranian people voted for an Islamic republic
in 1979.’
e.g. ‘I think this was not surprising. There was a lot of trouble in Iran and
something like this was bound to happen.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
e.g. ‘There were limited washing facilities and there was much disease.’
‘Many soldiers suffered from trench foot caused by the mud, and wet and
damp conditions.’
‘There were many rats in the trenches because of the dead bodies.’
‘In winter, soldiers suffered from frostbite.’
‘The constant shelling led to shell shock.’
‘In between the major battles it was often very boring in the trenches.’
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘Tanks were important in the war because they were an answer to the
most difficult problem in fighting trench warfare. Millions of men in the
infantry were killed trying to attack across No Man’s Land. Because of the
barbed wire and the machine gun-posts, they were easy to mow down. The
tanks, however, could cross No Man’s Land and smash through the barbed
wire. This opened up things for infantry who could then attack the enemy.’
e.g. ‘They were very important because they helped Britain win the war.’
9(c) ‘The Battle of Verdun was more important than the Battle of the 10
Somme.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your
answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I agree. The Battle of Verdun was crucial. Verdun was an important
part of the French defences and a German breakthrough would have been
devastating. The Germans also hoped that a German offensive on Verdun
would force the French and the British to send troops there to help defend it
and that this would weaken them in other areas of the fighting on the
Western Front. However, the French fought bravely and defended Verdun
successfully. This was an enormous help to French morale. It also showed
how difficult it was to attack heavily fortified places and the Germans did not
launch another major attack until 1918.’
OR
e.g. ‘I disagree. The Battle of the Somme was more important. It involved a
huge offensive by the British at the River Somme and was meant to defeat
the Germans and end the war. It did not do this but it did take pressure off
Verdun. The Germans had to take some of their troops away from the attack
on Verdun to send them to the Somme front. This helped the French at
Verdun hold out. The Somme was also important because it showed that
the war would not be over quickly.’
e.g. ‘I think they were both important because they affected the course of
the war.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
10(b) Why were the Home Fronts in Britain and Germany important in the 6
First World War?
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘The Home Fronts were crucial because this is where the war could
have been won or lost. One example of this is the production of armaments
for the armies to keep fighting. Rifles, machine guns, aeroplanes, artillery,
munitions and tanks all had to be produced for the armies. Without the
civilian workers producing all of this, the armies would have been powerless.
Many of the people working in the factories producing all of this were
women. One of the main reasons why Germany lost the war was because
its factories were struggling to produce all the weapons and equipment its
army needed, whereas in Britain production was increasing.’
e.g. ‘The Home Front produced all the weapons, munitions and equipment
that the armies needed.’
‘Both countries had to increase food production to keep their people fed.’
‘A collapse of morale on the Home Front would have been disastrous.’
‘Germany decided the best way to win the war was to starve Britain into
defeat by a blockade.’
‘Germany lost the war because of starvation and riots on the Home Front.’
e.g. ‘The Home Fronts were important because without them both countries
could not have fought the war.’
10(c) How important was the failure of the Gallipoli campaign in the First 10
World War? Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I do not think that the failure of the Gallipoli campaign was all that
important. This is because its purpose was to help Russia in the war by
defeating Turkey. This would mean Russia had one less country to fight on
the Eastern Front. Not enough troops were sent for the attack and they
ended up being stuck on the beaches under heavy fire. In the end, they
were withdrawn in 1916.The reason this did not matter that much was that in
the next year Russia signed an armistice and then withdrew from the war.
This was because of the revolution in Russia and so the Gallipoli campaign
would not have made much difference.’
OR
e.g. ‘The failure of the Gallipoli campaign was important. By 1915 the
fighting on the Western Front was at a stalemate and it was clear that
neither side was going to make a breakthrough. The idea behind the
invasion of Gallipoli was to win the war on the Eastern Front where Russia
was fighting Turkey. However, it was a disaster. Tens of thousands of men
were killed and the rest had to withdraw. This failure was important because
it meant there would be no breakthrough and the war would last for years.’
e.g. ‘Russia signed an armistice in the next year and then left the war.’
‘In the end, the war had to be won on the Western Front so the Gallipoli
campaign was irrelevant.’
‘Russia was not helped and so struggled badly in the war.’
‘The war would go on for several more years.’
‘It meant the war had to be won on the Western Front.’
‘It led to hundreds of thousands of casualties.’
‘It led to Winston Churchill resigning from the government because it was
his idea.’
‘It led to the British Prime Minister resigning.’
e.g. ‘The failure was very bad and was a disaster. This was why it was
important.’
11(a) Describe the events of 1932–33 that led to Hitler becoming Chancellor. 4
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
11(b) Why did the Nazis fail to win much support between 1924 and 1929? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘The Nazis failed to win much support in this period because the
Weimar Republic was doing well. Stresemann had got rid of inflation by
introducing a new currency. He had also negotiated the Dawes Plan which
involved the USA lending Germany money to get its economy going. This
happened and with the economic recovery came jobs. These successes
meant that people had no reason to turn to a small extremist party like the
Nazi Party.’
e.g. ‘The Weimar Republic had recovered and its economy was doing well.’
‘Stresemann managed to end inflation.’
‘The Dawes Plan helped Germany recover.’
‘The failure of the Munich Putsch was a setback for the Nazis.’
‘The Nazis had extreme policies and there was no reason for voters to
switch their support to them.’
e.g. ‘They did not have much support because they struggled to be popular
with the German people.’
11(c) ‘The Reichstag Fire was more important to Hitler than the Night of the 10
Long Knives.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your
answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I think the Reichstag Fire was more important. This is because it
happened just before an election. The Nazis blamed the fire on communists
and used it to persuade Hindenburg to pass an emergency decree that gave
the government more powers and cut individual rights. This let Hitler arrest
many of his opponents. He also used the fire to whip up hatred of the
communists and this helped him do well in the election where he nearly got
50% of the total vote. Overall, the fire was important because it let him
strengthen his position and make the communists weaker.’
OR
e.g. ‘I disagree with this. The Night of the Long Knives was much more
important because it was when Hitler dealt with the biggest threat he faced –
from Rohm and the SA. Rohm had built up the SA and had over 2 million
members, making him very powerful. He thought that Hitler was making too
many compromises and wanted him to be more radical. He was openly
criticising Hitler. In June 1933, Hitler moved against him and had the leaders
of the SA, including Rohm, executed. This meant the SA was under Hitler’s
control and he was much more secure.’
e.g. ‘I think the Reichstag Fire was very important because the Reichstag
building was burned down.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
12(b) Why did some young people rebel against the Hitler Youth? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘One important reason for this was the strict discipline of the Hitler
Youth, especially after membership became compulsory in 1936. The
Edelweiss Pirates were young people who wanted more freedom and did
not like the way in which the Nazis were trying to control every aspect of
their lives. They refused to join the Hitler Youth and ambushed their patrols
and beat them up. They wanted the freedom to go hiking and camping and
not have all their activities organised by the Hitler Youth.’
e.g. ‘They did not like the strict discipline of the Hitler Youth.’
‘They did not like the indoctrination that took place in the Hitler Youth.’
‘They were against the separation of sexes into the Hitler Youth and the
League of German Maidens.’
‘The Swing Movement opposed the fact that young people had to join the
Hitler Youth.’
‘Members of the Swing Movement wanted to grow their hair and wear
fashionable clothes and go against the image of the Hitler Youth.’
‘Members of the Swing Movement disliked the ideology of the Hitler Youth
and wanted to enjoy American music and life style.’
‘The Swing Movement was against the military nature of the Hitler Youth
and supported a counterculture by their clothing and music.’
e.g. ‘They rebelled against the Hitler Youth because they did not like all the
activities that went on there.’
12(c) ‘The Nazis managed to stay in power because they had popular 10
support.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your
answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘The Nazis did not stay in power because they had popular support.
They stayed in power by the use of force and by oppressing people. Any
opponents of the Nazis like communists were put in concentration camps
where they often died. The Gestapo spied on everyone by tapping their
phones and using informers. They encouraged everyone to spy on everyone
else, even people spying on their own family. Anyone that was suspected
was arrested and could be sent to a concentration camp without trial.’
OR
e.g. ‘I agree with this because the Nazis won popular support through the
use of propaganda. They indoctrinated people into Nazi ideas. This was
done by controlling everything that went on in newspapers and on the radio.
This meant that the news was controlled by the Nazis and that Hitler’s
speeches and praise for Hitler were the only things people read and heard.
Radios were set up in cafes and factories. Books, art and film were also
controlled. Being bombarded with constant Nazi propaganda meant that
people naturally thought the Nazi regime was wonderful.’
e.g. ‘The Nazis did have the support of many people in Germany who
supported their ideas.’
13(a) What were the consequences for Russia of the Russo-Japanese War? 4
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
e.g. ‘This war led to Bloody Sunday where an end to the war was one of the
demands.’
‘It was one of the causes of the 1905 revolution.’
‘It increased criticism of the Tsar’s rule of Russia.’
‘Soldiers returning from the war protested.’
‘There were naval mutinies at Sevastopol and aboard the battleship
Potemkin.’
‘It led to reforms of the Russian army.’
‘It led to the rise of Japan as a great power.’
‘It was a great blow to Russian pride and prestige.’
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘In January 1905, Father Gapon led protestors in a march to present a
petition for reforms to the Tsar. But before they could get to the Winter
Palace they were fired on by soldiers. Hundreds of people were killed and
many more injured. This sent shocks through Russia. People had believed
that the Tsar was their ‘father’ and would look after them. These killings
destroyed this belief and from then on things were never the same. Although
the Tsar survived in 1905, he never really recovered and Bloody Sunday
can be seen as the first important event that led to his downfall in 1917.’
e.g. ‘Bloody Sunday was important because it led to further unrest and
revolution.’
13(c) Are you surprised that the Tsar managed to remain in power until 10
1917? Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
OR
e.g. ‘Yes, I am very surprised. Many of the reforms the Tsar passed, he
soon went back on. The Duma was not the introduction of democracy. It
was packed with Tsarists and the Tsar simply dissolved it whenever he
wanted to. The Fundamental Laws gave him back a lot of his power and the
Okhrana (the secret police) were brutal and were hated. All of this made the
Tsar unpopular and it is surprising that he stayed in power until 1917. This is
especially because he was weakened by Russia’s disastrous entry into the
First World War. This soon led to food shortages. So I am surprised he
survived until 1917.’
e.g. ‘No. He was the Tsar and so many people would obey him. It is not
surprising that he stayed in power.’
14(a) Describe the impact of Stalin’s rule on ethnic minorities in the Soviet 4
Union.
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
14(b) Why did Stalin think it was necessary to reform Soviet industry? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘He did this because he wanted to make it better. Soviet industry
needed reforming and Stalin was ready to do it.’
14(c) ‘Collectivisation did more harm than good.’ How far do you agree with 10
this statement? Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
OR
e.g. ‘Russian agriculture was backward, was not producing the amount of
food needed and had to be reformed. Collectivisation was needed to
increase production. The fact that it did not work well at the beginning was
not the fault of collectivisation but the fault of Kulaks who opposed the
policy. They burned crops, killed millions of their animals and damaged
machinery. This caused less food to be produced and the result was famine.
By the late 1930s, most farms were collectivised, new machinery was being
used and the production of food did go up. Overall, it did more good than
harm.’
e.g. ‘Collectivisation was opposed by Kulaks and this led to disruption with
much livestock being killed.’
‘It did a lot of harm because it caused famine.’
‘In the long run it did increase the production of food.’
‘Collectivisation did harm to the Kulaks who lost their farms and some were
executed or sent to Siberia.’
e.g. ‘I think it did a lot of harm and many people suffered really badly.’
15(a) What new products did advertising promote during the 1920s? 4
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
e.g. ‘Many people wanted to buy things that made life at home easier like
fridges.’
‘Advertising promoted the sale of cars.’
‘Advertising tried to sell domestic appliances like washing machines and
vacuum cleaners.’
‘Advertising sold radios.’
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘Prohibition failed because the majority of people did not support it. This
was especially true in large cities. Many people still wanted alcohol and so
‘speakeasies’ sprang up. These were illegal drinking bars. Rich people had
alcohol delivered to their homes while poorer people made their own using
illegal stills. With many of the public against it, prohibition was never going
to work.’
e.g. ‘It failed because it never worked properly. They could not make it
work.’
15(c) ‘The lives led by rural and urban Americans in the 1920s were more 10
similar than they were different.’ How far do you agree with this
statement? Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I disagree with this. This is because there were many differences.
Flappers in the cities kept up with the latest fashions and had more freedom.
They smoked, drove cars and had more independence. Many women in
cities also had the new labour-saving devices. However, women in rural
areas still had hard traditional lives. They did not have labour-saving devices
and had to bring up children and work hard on the farm. They did not have
much money and lived hard lives just as in the past. Small farmers and
labourers in rural areas did not benefit from the boom in the 1920s and lived
much poorer lives than workers in the cities where there were plenty of well-
paid jobs.’
OR
e.g. ‘I agree with this. If you were poor then it did not make much difference
where you lived. The majority of American workers lived below the poverty
line and they could be found in rural and urban areas. Many workers in cities
such as female cotton operatives were paid low wages and were no better
off than small farmers or labourers in rural areas. Black Americans suffered
from discrimination in rural and urban areas. The persecution in southern
rural areas was worse with the Ku Klux Klan operating but in northern cities
they suffered from low wages and discrimination in housing.’
e.g. ‘I think their lives were very different because they were living in
different types of places.’
16(a) What were the Supreme Court’s objections to the New Deal? 4
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
e.g. ‘They said that parts of it like the AAA were against the constitution.’
‘It wanted welfare help to be given through the states and not by the federal
government.’
‘Most of the judges were Republican and did not believe in the federal
government intervening in people’s lives.’
‘Many of the judges thought that people should stand on their own two feet.’
‘The judges said that the National Industrial Recovery Act was
unconstitutional.’
‘The Supreme Court did not like the move from individualism to collectivism.’
16(b) Why did the promises Roosevelt made in the 1932 presidential election 6
appeal to the American people?
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘His promises appealed to people because of the dreadful situation that
America was in at the time. Banks and businesses were failing and people
were losing their jobs in their millions. There were no welfare benefits and
people lost their homes and had to live in shanty towns. Many people were
completely without any hope. Roosevelt promised ‘a new deal for the
American people’. His confidence that American society could be reformed
and be made fair for everyone raised people’s hopes. They believed that he
would rescue them from the Depression.’
e.g. ‘They appealed to them because the American people were in such a
desperate situation in the Depression.’
‘Roosevelt had a reputation for helping the elderly and the poor in New York
State.’
‘Compared to Hoover he seemed full of hope for the future.’
‘Roosevelt had a warm friendly personality and filled people with hope.’
e.g. ‘His promises were just what the American people needed at that time.’
16(c) ‘The fact that Roosevelt introduced the Second New Deal in 1935–36 10
shows that the First New Deal had failed.’ How far do you agree with
this statement? Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I think this is right. The Second New Deal was introduced to deal with
the areas that the First New Deal was weak on. The First New Deal did not
do much about workers’ rights and welfare. Some critics like Huey Long said
that it did not help those who were unemployed and poor. Parts of the
Second New Deal showed how Roosevelt was trying to put this right. The
right of workers to join trade unions was defended and pensions for elderly
were introduced as well as insurance against unemployment.’
OR
e.g. ‘I do not agree with this at all. The First New Deal did an awful lot and
was a success. It helped farmers by paying them to cut production. This
increased their income. Banks were saved and reopened again.
Employment was provided by job creation schemes and building projects
such as dams and roads. Industry was helped to recover by using the ‘Blue
Eagle’ scheme which businesses joined. The First New Deal did not solve
every problem but it stopped businesses going bankrupt and helped those in
desperate need.’
e.g. Disagree:
‘The banking system was saved.’
‘The homeless and those starving were helped.’
‘Jobs were created.’
‘Businesses were prevented from going bankrupt.’
‘The regeneration of the Tennessee Valley was a great success.’
e.g. Agree:
‘There was still a lot of unemployment.’
‘Wealth was not re-distributed to the poor.’
‘Not enough was done to get rid of poverty.’
e.g. ‘The First New Deal was a not a failure. It helped a lot of people.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
17(b) Why did Chiang Kai-shek think that the five extermination campaigns 6
were necessary?
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘He thought this because he had decided that it was the only solution for
his problems in China.’
17(c) ‘Leadership was the main factor that determined the outcome of the 10
Civil War.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your
answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I agree with this. When they first got to Yenan, Mao laid down basic
principles. One was to win over the support of the peasants. This became a
crucial factor in the Civil War. The peasants supported Mao and the
Communists because they treated the peasants much better than the
Nationalists. Mao insisted that the Communists lived with the peasants and
helped them. He also promised the peasants their own land. This was very
important because the peasants were the largest group in China and so this
gave the Communists mass support. Mao dominated the Communists and
gave them clear leadership.’
OR
e.g. ‘I think that other factors were important. The corruption of the
Nationalists was very unpopular with the Chinese people. It was so bad that
it made the Americans stop sending support to them. The Nationalists lost
support and even their own soldiers began to desert and join the
Communists who were seen as defenders of the country. The tactics of the
Communists also helped. They avoided big battles and launched smaller
attacks.’
e.g. ‘The Nationalists were weakened by the war against the Japanese.’
‘Chiang’s desire for a powerful centralised government meant he upset too
many different groups in China.’
‘Mao made sure the Communists won over the peasants.’
‘The Communists were given help by the USSR.’
‘The corruption of the Nationalists lost them much support.’
‘The charismatic leadership of Mao gave the Communists a unity of
command.’
‘The Communists were seen as standing up to the Japanese more.’
‘The Communists used better tactics such as small attacks rather than large
battles.’
‘Chiang failed to give the Nationalists clear and popular leadership.’
‘The Nationalists were seen by the Chinese people as corrupt.’
e.g. ‘Leadership was very important but there were other factors like the
popularity of the Communists.’
18(a) What was the policy adopted by China from 1979 in relation to 4
population growth?
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
18(b) Why was China able to achieve economic growth from the late 1970s? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘China was able to achieve economic growth after a new ten-year plan
for rapid growth was devised in 1978. This allowed China to follow a new
direction, closer to a Western-style economy. Foreign trade resumed, along
with borrowing from foreign investors in an effort to generate capital.
Agriculture also benefited economically from the introduction of greater
resources following on from a sharp increase in the prices paid for farm
goods and products from 1979. There was a change from collective to
family farming and greater choice for peasants in what was grown, with
impressive harvests in the early 1980s after excellent weather. Many small
industries, transport companies and other services were set up by the many
who decided to leave farming.’
e.g. ‘China achieved growth after it introduced a plan for the economy.’
‘China adopted different policies on trade and investment.’
‘China modernised its industry and agriculture with a more Western-style
approach.’
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I agree with this. Deng’s economic reforms did lead to high economic
growth which led to an increase in the standard of living of millions of
Chinese people. Other improvements included allowing peasants to earn
extra income by selling produce from their plots of land. Deng also opened
China up to the rest of the world and outside cultural influences began to
impact on the lives of the Chinese. Many of them moved to the cities for jobs
and bought consumer goods.’
OR
e.g. ‘There were important social changes such as many people moving to
the cities.’
‘The standard of living of many Chinese was improved.’
‘Many Chinese bought more consumer goods.’
‘The Communist Party kept control and did not allow dissent.’
‘The policy of one child per family was continued and strictly enforced.’
‘Many Chinese were happy not to have political freedoms if they had
economic freedom.’
e.g. ‘I think that the economic reforms did bring many changes to the lives of
the Chinese people.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
e.g. ‘Agents recruited young men from their villages to work in mines.’
‘Black South Africans migrated from their villages to work in diamond and
gold mines.’
‘Migrant workers were on short contracts.’
‘While at work, the workers lived in male-only compounds.’
‘The mining companies fed and housed the workers.’
‘The mining companies kept the wages low.’
‘The workers took their wages back to their home villages.’
‘The workers were treated harshly by their overseers.’
19(b) Why was the Natives Land Act of 1913 unpopular with black South 6
Africans?
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘It was very unpopular with black South Africans because it banned
share-cropping. This was how they could farm for themselves. They gave
half their crop to the white landowner in return for the land they used, but at
least they could produce food to feed their families. The banning of share-
cropping meant they could not farm for themselves and they had to either
work for the farmer as a labourer or work in the mines.’
e.g. ‘It stopped them owning or renting land except in the black reserves.’
‘It led to black share-croppers being evicted and ending up homeless.’
‘It meant black South Africans could no longer be farmers except in the
reserves.’
‘It forced black South Africans to become labourers for white farmers.’
e.g. ‘It was unpopular because it did a great deal of harm to them and made
their lives difficult.’
19(c) How far was the victory of the National Party in the 1948 election 10
caused by the failings of the United Party? Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I do not agree with this. I think the National Party won because of its
own policies and ideas. It promised a white South Africa under Afrikaner
rule. This would involve moving black South Africans to the reserves. This
pleased Afrikaners, who made up the majority of white South Africans and
who believed in white supremacy and were worried about their culture being
overwhelmed by black South Africans. They also promised white
industrialists lots of cheap black labour which would be allowed to leave the
reserves to work in the cities. All of this appealed to the Afrikaners.’
OR
e.g. ‘I agree with this. The United Party which was the party in power was
very unpopular, especially with Afrikaners. This was because after the war
the South African economy was in a mess and white workers found that
when they returned from the war, their jobs had been taken by black South
Africans. They were also worried by all the black protests and strikes and
feared black South Africans taking over. They blamed this on Smuts and his
government which they thought did not seem able to keep black South
Africans under control.’
e.g. ‘The policies of the National Party were very popular with Afrikaners.’
‘The National Party promised to move black South Africans to the reserves.’
‘The National party promised to keep South Africa under Afrikaner rule.’
‘The National Party promised to provide factory and mine owners with lots of
cheap labour.’
‘The National Party promised to provide white farmers with lots of cheap
labour.’
‘The United Party government was not sorting out South Africa’s economic
problems.’
‘The United Party government was not dealing with protests and strikes by
black South Africans.’
‘Afrikaners did not like the flood of black workers to the cities which the
United Party seemed to be allowing.’
‘The United Party government had kept food prices low which was not good
for white farmers.’
e.g. ‘I think the United Party lost the election because it had some very bad
ideas and policies.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
20(b) Why was there opposition to apartheid from outside South Africa? 6
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘This happened because more and more nations in Africa were winning
their independence from the colonial rule of whites. As black Africans took
over in countries near South Africa like Angola, Mozambique and
Zimbabwe, they were hostile to South Africa and apartheid. South Africa
had been able to depend on these ‘buffer states’ but not after the 1970s and
1980s. These countries let organisations like the ANC, liberation fighters
from Namibia and even soldiers from Cuba set up camps from which they
could attack South Africa.’
e.g. ‘This was because more African countries were being ruled by black
governments who were against apartheid.’
‘The United Nations had many countries with black governments and they
were against apartheid, turning the UN against it.’
‘Many ordinary people in countries like Britain were horrified by the
injustices of apartheid.’
‘Events like Sharpeville turned more people outside South Africa against
apartheid.’
e.g. ‘There was lots of opposition because people did not like the way
apartheid was working in South Africa.’
20(c) ‘The Soweto Uprising in 1976 was a turning point in the opposition to 10
the apartheid state.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain
your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘Yes, I think it was a turning point. When other events like Sharpeville
had happened in the past, the police had quickly regained control but after
Soweto there was almost never-ending unrest and violence and the police
never really got the townships under control again. From this moment,
opposition to apartheid grew and exploded in the 1980s. The townships
became hotbeds of opposition and hid ANC guerrillas. The Soweto Uprising
started all this.’
OR
e.g. ‘No, I do not think it was a turning point. There had been riots and
demonstrations long before this and this was just one of many. It is
important to remember that it was still a long time before apartheid and
minority rule would be ended at the end of the 1980s and in the early 1990s.
What was happening in South Africa was a gradual declining of apartheid
that had been going on for a long time. Soweto was just a step in that
process.’
e.g. ‘I do think it was a turning point because it was a very important event
for South Africa.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
e.g. ‘Britain met with France and Israel and agreed to invade Suez.’
‘Britain and France issued an ultimatum threatening to intervene if the
Egyptians and Israelis did not agree to a ceasefire.’
‘British and French aircraft bombed Egyptian airfields.’
‘British and French troops invaded Suez.’
‘Under US pressure Britain agreed to a ceasefire in November.’
‘British and French forces withdrew.’
21(b) Why were the consequences of the Yom Kippur War of 1973 6
important?
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘The consequences were important because the war showed how
powerful a weapon the Arab states had over the US and the West. During
the war, the Arab states had announced an embargo on oil supplies to the
US and the West. Although the war ended shortly afterwards, this threat
showed everyone what a powerful weapon the oil states had over the West.
The Arab states produced over a third of the world’s oil and they could
cripple the West’s economies by reducing supply.’
e.g. ‘It showed the Arab states could harm the West by stopping the supply
of oil.’
‘The Arab states worked together much more effectively.’
‘The Arab armed forces and people regained a lot of self-confidence.’
‘Israel realised that it would not have security until a diplomatic solution was
found.’
‘The oil threat made the US keener to find a settlement.’
e.g. ‘The consequences were very important to the whole world and
changed the situation quite a lot.’
21(c) ‘The Six-Day War of 1967 solved Israel’s problems.’ How far do you 10
agree with this statement? Explain your answer.
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘The Six-Day War was a great success for Israel and solved its
problems by strengthening the country and weakening Arab countries. Israel
had been worried about possible attacks by the Arab countries and so
struck first. By destroying so much of the Arab armed forces and winning
more land, Israel was much more secure. Winning the Golan Heights
improved Israel’s defences against Syria and its defences in other areas
were improved by driving Egypt back across the Sinai. At the end of the war,
the Arab states were in no position to threaten Israel.’
OR
e.g. ‘The Six-Day War actually increased Israel’s problems. The military
victory would not ensure Israel’s safety forever. Only a diplomatic settlement
would do that. Its conquests of Gaza, the West Bank, East Jerusalem and
the Golan Heights meant that many Palestinian Arabs were now living under
Israeli control. This would cause Israel problems in the future as would Arab
claims that Israel had no right to the conquered territory.’
e.g. ‘The Six-Day War did not solve Israel’s problems. There were still many
problems left that had to be solved.’
Level 1 – One mark for each relevant point; additional mark for
supporting detail 1–4
e.g. ‘The Gaza strip is on the Mediterranean coast between Egypt and
Israel.’
‘It is a self-governing Palestinian territory.’
‘It is claimed by the state of Palestine.’
‘It is governed by Hamas.’
‘It is under a US boycott.’
‘Because of an Israeli blockade its people cannot leave or enter.’
(Four marks for one explanation, five marks for full explanation)
e.g. ‘Hezbollah has attacked Israel’s border and killed Israeli soldiers.’
‘Hezbollah has claimed gas fields in Israel.’
‘It has thousands of rockets stationed on the Israeli border.’
‘Hezbollah does not recognise Israel and has called for its destruction.’
‘It has been a problem for Israel because of its activities and threats.’
An answer which only has one explanation on one side of the argument
cannot be awarded more than 8.
e.g. ‘I agree with this. Israel has built Jewish settlements on land it occupied
after the Six-Day War. This includes the West Bank and East Jerusalem as
well as the Golan Heights. This has caused enormous problems because
Israel regards them as legal while most countries as well as the UN and
Palestinians regard them as illegal. They have been an obstacle to peace
because even the US has sometimes stated that withdrawal from most
settlements is necessary for a peace agreement. Israel refuses to accept
that.’
OR
e.g. ‘The PLO campaigned and fought for a Palestinian state for many
years. Its use of guerrilla, and even terrorist, tactics lost the cause support
and made peace more difficult. Some Israelis have claimed that the creation
of a Palestinian state has created a breeding ground for organisations like
Hamas and so this has made peace more difficult. However, many people,
even at times the USA, argued that there would no peace without the
question of a Palestinian state being settled.’
e.g. ‘I think they both made peace more difficult because they both upset the
other side.’