Thesis
Thesis
Thesis
Title
2 University
Test anxiety is a widespread problem that hinders students' performance and unlock their
potential. Emotional intelligence is one of the various suggested predictors of test anxiety, the
current study is an attempt to investigate the relationship between the emotional intelligence
and test anxiety, a descriptive correlational design was opted to examine the correlation
between the two variables. Two different scales were used: the trait emotional intelligence
questionnaire and the Westside Test anxiety scale. The scales were submitted to eighty
master one students of the department of English language and literature at Mohamed Lamine
After gathering the data using the two scales of emotional intelligence and test anxiety, the
data was analysed by statistical package for social sciences. The value of the correlation
coefficient is equal to -0.22 at a p-value of 0.048 that indicates a low negative correlation
between emotional intelligence and test anxiety. That is to say, the higher the levels of
emotional intelligence are, the less the levels of test anxiety are. Therefore, the research
hypothesis that claim that there is a negative relationship between the two variables is
established.
Dedication
3
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my gratitude to DR AZIZ Asma for her guidance and
supervision of
this work
I would like to thank Dr Madiha SCNOUCI and Dr Souhila MAKHOUKH for
honouring me
with their presence and evaluation of my thesis
4
Table of Contents
General Introduction 1
1. Background of Study 1
2. Statement of the Problem 2
4. Objectives of Study 2
5. Research Questions 3
6. Research Hypothesis 3
6.1 Null Hypothesis 3
6.2 Alternative Hypothesis 3
7. Significance of study 3
8. Operational Definition of Key Terms 4
literature review 6
Introduction 6
Section One: Test Anxiety 7
1.1.1 Definition Of Test Anxiety 7
1.1.2 Components of test anxiety 8
1.1.3 Symptoms of Test Anxiety 8
1.1.4 Causes of Test Anxiety 9
1.1.5 Factors Related to Test Anxiety 10
1.1.6 Impacts Of Test Anxiety 11
1.1.7 Relation Between Test Anxiety and Learning Disabilities 13
1.1.8 The Relationship Between Test Anxiety and Self-Efficacy 13
1.1.9 Strategies to Cope with Test Anxiety 14
1.1.10 Review of Relevant Research 17
Section two Emotional intelligence 18
1.2.1 Definition of Emotional Intelligence 18
5
Research Methodology 32
Introduction 32
2.1 Research Design 32
2.2 Population And Sample 32
2.3 The Procedures 33
2.4 Participants in the Exploration Phase 33
2.5 Focus Group Discussion 33
2.5.1 Piloting and revising focus group discussion 34
2.6 FDG Administration Procedures 35
2.7 Semi-Structured Interview 35
2.7.1 Pilot Semi-Structured Interview 36
2.8 Semi-Structured Interview Administration 36
2.9 Research Instruments 37
6
2.9.1 Pilot Test of The TEIQP And Westside Test Anxiety Scale 37
2.10 Correlational Research 37
2.10.1 Forms of Correlational Research 38
2.10.2 Data Collection Methods in correlational research 38
2.10.2.1 Surveys. 38
2.10.2.2 Observational Data. 38
2.10.2.3 Existing data sets 38
2.10.3 Data Analysis Methods in Correlational Research 39
2.11 Test of Trait Emotional Intelligence (short form) 39
2.12 Westside Test Anxiety Scale 40
2.13 Mixed Methods Design 40
2.14 Case Study Design 41
2.15 Data Analysis Procedures 41
2.15.1 Analysis of the Exploration Tools 41
2.15.2 Analysis Of The Quantitative Tools 42
Conclusion 42
Chapter Three 43
Introduction 43
3.1 Data Analysis 43
3.1.1 Analysis of the exploratory data 43
3.1.1.1 Analyzing of the Focus Group Discussion. 43
3.1.1.2 Analysis of the Interview 44
3.1.2 Analysis of Experimental Data 45
3.1.2.1 Reliability of (TEIQUE-SF). 45
3.1.2.2 VALIDITY of (TEIQUE SF). 46
3.1.2.3 Reliability of the Westside Test Anxiety Scale. 46
3.1.2.4 VALIDITY Of Westside Test Anxiety Scale. 47
3.1.3 Presentation and Analysis of Hypothesis 53
3.1.4 Spearman Correlation Measurement 54
3.2 Discussion Of The Findings 55
3.3 Recommendations 55
3.4 Suggestions For Further Research 56
Conclusion 56
7
General conclusion 57
References 1
Appendices 12
List of Tables
45
46
46
Table 3.4 Validity Statistics of Cronbach's Alpha of Westside Test Anxiety Scale 47
47
47
52
53
8
List of Figures
Figure 3.1 Scores Mean of Students Westside Test Anxiety and Emotional Intelligence 51
General Introduction
1. Background of Study
As indicated by Dutta (2013) that education was one of the significant lifetime systems
of individuals, being much the same as there are clear basic dynamic techniques of life in
regular routine. If the person did not get education he would be disqualified to maintain his
standard living, that’s why education considered as an important process of normal living.
Tests and exams are an essential component of the educational system. For Tests and exams
marks are used to evaluate students .Thus, these marks will affect their academic careers and
their lives. According to Namati (2012) students’ lives are now influenced by their
performance in tests and examinations. Being of that importance, anxiety nowadays about
test taking is a widespread phenomenon, approximately each third student reports some level
definition presented by Zeindar gathers the different dimensions that are involved in test
excessive worry is detrimental to learning, affects the brain functions of students, and
eventually detract from his performance. Accordingly, academic performance is not related
involves another emotional capacity that is emotional intelligence (Daniel Gollman , 1995)
"EI is the capacity to understand and reason with emotion, assimilate emotion in thought,
and regulate emotion in oneself and others"( Mayer et al, 2004 ,p. 200). They asserted that
people's sentiments and emotions affect, direct, and control their style of thinking, what they
2
consider, how they behave, make decisions, and solve difficulties. As stated by (Vandervoort,
2006) Students with higher levels of emotional intelligence are able to understand and
control their emotions better and this may facilitate them to develop self-motivation, effective
communication skills, better personal and social adaptation which is an essential skill that
helps students to become confident learners, it will improve the process of learning and
likelihood of success. That being the case, the present study in an attempt to investigate the
relationship between students ' levels emotional intelligence and their levels of test anxiety.
Test anxiety is an academic obstacle that hinders students' performance, and disserve
the process of recalling previous information (wine,1971). FGDs with Master one students
at Mohamed Lamine Debaghine Setif2 university revealed that students are experiencing
emotions of stress and anxiety about test taking. They claimed difficulty to regulate
emotional arousal during tests. what brings to light, the concept of emotional intelligence that
refers to the ability to perceive and manage different kinds of emotions including stress and
fear however, an interview with teachers revealed that the components of emotional
intelligence ( self-awareness , empathy, social skills and motivation ) does not receive enough
attention in classroom . In response to this, the current study aims to investigate the
possible predictor of the problem (TA) and therefore to an opportunity to be decreased and
managed.
3. Objectives of Study
4. Research Question
In alignment with the previously mentioned problem and purpose, this research will
What are levels of EI among master one students at Mohamed lamine debaghine setif
university ?
What are levels of test anxiety among master one students at Mohamed lamine
debaghine setif
2 university?
Is there any significant relationship between test anxiety and emotional intelligence
among
5. Research Hypothesis
There is a statistical negative relationship between students' levels of test anxiety and
6. Significance of study
This study's significance lies in the fact that it addresses an academic difficulty that is
its relationship with levels of emotional intelligence. It drives both students and teachers
reach an efficient academic life and to enable students to reach their full potential. As well as,
to highlight the negative impact of test anxiety on students’ performance and hence they seek
negative correlation between the two variables (EI and TA) will pave the way to take in
consideration a test anxiety interventions to reduce its levels and emotional intelligence
academic outcomes. Furthermore, establishing the research hypothesis will create the
opportunity for conducting other investigations concerning EI and TA since proving the
correlation is the origin of other types of research like conducting experiments about effects
Additionally, the current investigation will be valuable for the students to upgrade
their emotional intelligence and to conquer their exam anxiety. It will be useful for the
instructors to understand the students’ EI level. Educators will comprehend how to build up
5
their instructing systems that will enhance their teaching procedure and assist students to
Defining key terms used along the research is crucial to guarantee the apprehension
for readers.
the accurate appraisal and expression of emotion in oneself and others, the effective
regulation of emotion in oneself and others, and the use of feelings to motivate, plan,
stress, anxiety, and discomfort during and/or before taking a test. This anxiety creates
8. Delimitations of Study
The present study is also confined to the operational definitions of key terms
mentioned above
9. Overview of Methodology
The current investigation is a descriptive correlational study since it aims to investigate the
relationship between test anxiety and emotional intelligence. . The population for this study is
master one students at Mohamed Lamin Debaghin setif 2 university, department of English
language and literature. Such a choice of population is made for the reason that master one
student are mature enough to respond to self-reporting scales and that they have a sufficient
In order to confirm the existence of the problem of TA among the population of the research
, FGDs with students and interviews with teachers were conducted in the exploratory phase .
for data collection two scales ( EI scale and TA scale ) were submitted to eighty students
The present study is divided to three chapters. The first chapter is divided to two
sections, the first section deals with some of the research available in English language
literature on test anxiety definition of TA its components, its symptoms and other social
factors related to test anxiety . Furthermore, it presents the different negative impacts of test
anxiety on the students’ performance and its relationship with other aspects like self-efficacy
and learning disabilities ,strategies to cope with test anxiety and the role of teacher in
moderating levels of test anxiety in classroom are mounted . the second section presents
background about the concept , its major components , its relationship with social intelligence
7
, alexithymia and other life phenomenon ending up with development of EI among students
and in classroom .
The second chapter sets out the methodology, it identifies the opted research design,
approach and the research setting. Then, the research population, sample and sampling
techniques were mentioned. After that, it unveils the procedure of data collection starting
from the exploratory phase to the procedure of analysing data. Finally, chapter three presents
the results, analysis of the data collected in the exploratory phase and then the data collected
from the tow scales, it carries on with presenting and establishing the hypothesis and finally
Introduction
The modern society is an achievement-based society that test and evaluations plays a
fundamental role in a person’s life especially when it comes to the educational and academic
field where students are regularly and frequently tested. Thus, the stress about examinations
is a widespread phenomenon that is referred to as test anxiety the state of discomfort and
emotional arousal during examination and in situations where performance is evaluated. Test
anxiety is an educational obstacle that can be overcome by the recognition of one own
emotion and the management of them in other words by the emotional intelligence
competence which consists of both self and society awareness and management.
The current study endeavours to investigate on the relationship between the students'
EI and their TA level. The first section of this chapter reviews the definition of test anxiety its
components, symptoms, causes and impacts. And finally it introduces strategies to cope with
test anxiety. The second section seeks to define the construct of emotional intelligence,
explain its different aspects and to present its relationship with other life phenomena,
terminating with pre-existing research that yields valuable results concerning the relationship
This section presents a brief conceptual and overview of the domain of test anxiety. It is for the
Purpose of discussing different aspects related to test anxiety considering the fact that it is an
Increasing pervasive and prevalent phenomenon in modern society
and discomfort during and/or before taking a test. This anxiety creates significant barriers to
experiences a feeling of apprehension and uneasiness during, before, and after a certain exam.
academic assessment situations, due to concern about poor performance and possible
negative consequences “(Balogun et al, 2017,p. 115). Zeidner (1998) asserts that many
students have the ability to do well on exams, but perform poorly because of their debilitating
development, as test scores and grades influence entrance to many educational or vocational
training programs in modern society , this claim concurs what sarason (1990) study have
difficulty in comprehending relatively simple instructions, and also have difficulty organizing
failure .There are several different estimates for the prevalence of test anxiety, with numbers
ranging from 10%-30% among high school and university students (Damer & Melendres,
Two of the components of TA are emotionality and worry (Bembenutty, 2009; Bonaccio,
Damer & Melendres, 2011).”Worry reflect the cognitive image of uncertainty about one's
own performance, while emotionality referred to autonomic reactions which tend to occur
Nonetheless , Liebert and Morris(1967) suggested that worry was inversely related to
emotionality but , test anxiety is related to some parts of executive memory; due to that,
underperformance. they have also described two components of TA: affectivity and delusion
that is the cognitive part of test anxiety, consisting of negative evaluations and thoughts about
the individual's own performance. The affective Part of TA include to the one's own
emotional reactions to situations such as success or failure in the evaluation process (Pekrun,
2006).
TA is a serious educational issue that affects the learners ' performance and
consequently their academic success, in order to cope with test anxiety and to overcome it the
first signs of it must be noticed from its early stages. According to Cherry Kendra (2012), test
anxiety symptoms might be mild to severe. Moderate symptomatic students can nonetheless
11
perform reasonably well on tests. Other students who struggle with acute anxiety frequently
● Physical signs of test anxiety: Anxiety in general gets the body, mind, and behaviour
ready to recognize and respond to threats to survival. A person's body then starts to
hyperventilate in order to increase the amount of oxygen that gets into the
bloodstream, redirect blood to the muscles, and sweat in order to cool the skin
breath, headache, stomach contraction, chewing of nails and pen covers, breaking of
● Emotional signs of test anxiety: racing thoughts, feeling of anger, fear, feeling of
test during it, Even when they have adequately prepared for the test, students
TA is considered an influential academic issue that negatively impacts students outcomes thus , many
Factors are suggested by literature as predictors of TA
test irrelevant thoughts, and other physical symptoms relating to anxiety while being tested”
12
test anxiety. likewise , parental attitudes and behaviours are significant factors in college
sense that their children are compelled to maintain their success and academic
“The characteristics of the test environment like the importance of the task,
atmosphere, the given time ,examiner attitudes and physical setting can affect the level of
cognitive and emotional factors it is also affected by external elements , even for a non-
anxious students if the test is of a determine importance his levels of TA are likely to increase
anxiety results from an interaction of cognitive control and value appraisals regarding a
specific achievement situation (e.g., an upcoming exam). While value appraisals refer to the
value students subjectively attribute to achievement activities (e.g., learning for the exam)
pupils with low expectations for their own efficacy.in high threat situations test anxiety and
worry increase( sealend , 2011) . Researchers Putwain and Best (2011) expressed that test
performance among elementary children when they are put under teacher's pressure in an
13
attempt to create a higher stress environment is worse in high threat situations test anxiety
and worry increase. Allan Wigfield and Jacquelynne (2010) proposed that anxiety is a
multifaceted construct with roots in how parents respond to their children's early aspirations
for Achievement. Its ontogeny is linked to children's growing ability to evaluate their
academic performance in light of their prior performance, other students' performance, and
the stricter evaluative standards they face as they advance through the school system.
Sansgiry (2006) claimed that Test anxiety is correlated with students' perceptions of their
course load and their capacity for time management with their coursework. Future research
should assess how stress/time programs help people feel less anxious and stressed.
Some researchers have noted a relation between test anxiety and a history of learning
difficulties (e.g., Peleg, 2009; Sena et al., 2007). For example, Peleg (2009) found that among
students with a learning disability, test anxiety was significantly higher when compared to
rates of test anxiety among students without a history of learning disabilities. Sena and
colleagues reported that because students with learning disabilities were more likely to have
negative
Test anxiety has been identified as a major obstacle many students with learning
disabilities face(Cohen et. al., 2004).For students with learning disabilities, the consequences
of test anxiety may be more severe (e.g., Holzer, Madaus, Bray, & Kehle, 2009). For
example, the research indicates that students with learning disabilities are less likely to use
test-taking strategies(i.e., reading the questions first to know what to read for) than their peers
without learning disabilities, and are considered to be less test-wise (Holzer, Madaus, Bray
Kehle, 2009). Test anxiety among students with learning disabilities has been linked to
academic performance problems as well as more behavior problems and hostile feelings
14
about school, as compared to students with no identified learning disability (Peleg, 2009).
Specifically, students with learning disabilities are more likely to report feeling more stress,
nervousness, frustration
Test anxiety can impair students' performance and harm their whole academic life since
they will not be able to achieve an effective learning, beside to the academic effects, test
anxious students reported themselves to have a lower self-esteem compared to less anxious
students (e.g., Peleg, 2009, Thomas & Gadbois, 2007) . Hembree(1988) states that
improvement in test scores and grade point average is highly related to test anxiety
that test anxiety is related to students’ underachievement and low performance ( rwizan, and
nacire, 2010). In the same context another study conducted by Hancock (2001) revieled
statistically significant findings that showed that anxious students performed badly and had
lower motivation to learn, comparing to less anxious students . He came to the conclusion
that students who are extremely test-anxious do badly and are less motivated to perform when
institution.
Hunsley (1985) found that the relationship between test anxiety and academic
performance was significantly negative.” Students who show a high level of test anxiety
obtain lower marks than students who reported a moderated level of test anxiety” .(hassan
and Khaled, 2009, p .8 ) the same researchers have also examined the connection between
test anxiety and academic accomplishment they found that people who perform well
academically also had low test anxiety ratings and vice versa. Kaya (2004) views that The
primary factor which has an impact on achievement in Science is test anxiety. In addition to
15
that test anxiety seems to have a negative impact on the learner’s study skills as well. High
For high test-anxious students, quality of study habits and time dedicated for study
were positively related to academic performance, whereas frequent absences and delaying
exams were inversely related to underperformance. Culler and Holahan (1980) and
Hambrees' (1988 revealed that Test anxiety affects performance negatively. It is inversely
related to students' self-esteem and directly related to their worries about being judged
negatively, acting defensively, and other types of anxiety. Ability, gender, and grade level are
factors that contribute to varied TA levels. There are many effective treatments for lowering
Figure 1.1: The Impact of Test Anxiety on Performance (Illustration of the Yerkes-Dodson
law )
general. Then , the role the teacher can play to reduce this anxiety will be identified .
16
Hashemi and Mashayekh (2011) explain that the best way to reduce anxiety is to work on
personal health, diet, exercise, and sleep. Their suggestions continue to explain improving
Moreover ,Coleman’s(2012) suggestions include a long list of small changes teachers can
make in the classroom: Encourage students to remind themselves of the positives attributes
they hold; focus on creating realistic plans of actions for finding and reaching students’
individual goals; congratulate students’ progress, even if the end goal is not yet met; use
descriptive feedback, for example, say “You set up the equations correctly!” instead of
“Good job”; do not compare progress between students; and use practice tests to boost
confidence. Self-image is one of the main reasons students experience test anxiety, so the
simple ideas listed above can improve the students’ images of themselves. Cassady (2004)
supports Hashemi & Mashayekh by stating that to overcome test anxiety, teachers should
implement setting goals in the classroom, show students how to effectively prepare for tests,
teach how to control stress, and provide motivational support. By implementing these above
ideas in our classrooms, students may be less likely to fall down the spiral of negative
thinking from one or two bad performances or experiences with a subject.Cassady supports
setting goals in the classroom to increase self-confidence, but also believes that students need
to learn how to prepare for tests. Teachers can also help improve this area as well. As
mentioned above, practice tests are a good way to improve self-image, but also help students
reduce anxiety. Hashemi and Mashayekh (2011) explain that practice tests are the most
proven, yet least used way to study for tests to reduce anxiety. With practice tests, students
are given a chance to see their areas of weakness and strength. The students also get a look at
how a test may be organised, enhancing their confidence and reducing anxiety.
When test day does arrive, teachers can continue to reduce anxiety by making sure
that the tests are parallel to the teaching and practice tests.your self-image, motivation, and
17
attitudes can help reduce anxiety. As many know, teachers do not have control over how
healthy a student is, how much sleep he or she gets, or what his or her home life is like. But
teachers can help reduce anxiety in some ways. One of the main areas causing this test
anxiety is the low self-image of students who consistently perform poorly on tests. This is an
Coleman (1993) gives specific focuses on how to write tests to decrease anxiety.
Salend explains that it is important to use “student-friendly tests,” which he defines as tests
that are valid, accessible, and motivating and employ best practices for creating test
directions and items. Salend (2009) suggests to use essay questions to test students on
information learned during cooperative learning or inquiry activities, while using multiple
choice or true and false questions to test students on factual knowledge, making sure to use
Salend (2012) continues explaining that tests should be easy to read, using vocabulary
students know, and separating directions so it is easy to distinguish directions from questions.
Salend also suggests using test questions related to students’ lives. We must realize, though,
that just by making the test easy to read and relatable may not reduce anxiety in students. As
seen above, confidence and thoughts before and during the test can also cause anxiety. So, it
is also important for teachers to teach test taking strategies (Hashemi & Mashayekh, 2011).
The teacher can develop and review study guides that will provide students with insight on
the purpose, content, and formation of the test. Lastly, make sure summative assessments are
not the only type of assessment used. Consider using other assessments such as portfolios and
observations. This will make students feel more comfortable, knowing that tests are not the
Creswell, Waite, and Cooper (2003) viewed that coping with test anxiety can be achieved
perceptions , stimuli of fear, managing problems and working on coping skills . educational
decisions about their growth and validity are made. Giving children access to effective study
techniques, test-taking procedures, and surroundings can help them succeed in school and in
other spheres of their lives. However, According to the study of Nagwoke et al (2013) ,
students' test anxiety was unaffected by their study habits. Compared to cognitive and
psychomotor issues, test anxiety is more of an emotional problem. Test anxiety was
other crucial school learning activities that have an impact on students' academic readiness
optimize students' emotional health and general well-being. Additionally, parents are
encouraged to express increasing awareness of and concern for testing and the testing
environments that their children experience at school. Continued cultural dialogue about
gender is necessary to emphasize that there should be a focus on gender differences, on the
other hand, Barry & Messer (2003) highlighted two self-monitoring approaches that are used
● cognitive management method (Mithem and Young, 2001): This method outlines
the relationship between behavioural responses and their outcomes. This cognition
highlights the origin of the response. This method emphasizes the importance of
19
examining students ' own thinking processing before making responses. In order to
that underlie and control impulses are improved (Washbush & Hill, 2001).
Coping with test anxiety is not the responsibility of the psychologist and Instructors
alone. The learners, parents and all the responsible for education Must collaborate and act
together to make sure that learners are free of test anxiety. To enhance their performance
which is a need for social and institutional progress (Bekomson and Amalu2021). Kondo
(1997) suggested that basic strategies for managing test anxiety are divided into five methods
● The first type, Preparation, stands for attempts at controlling the impending threat by
making more study effort. Use of Method helps to improve learners’ competence and
● The third type set for Positive Thinking, include the focus on pleasing situation and
enjoyable thoughts rather than the fact that the student is in an anxiety provoking
situation
● The fourth type, Peer Seeking, which means the observation of the other
● students and noticing that they are as anxious as himself can reduce the levels of test
anxiety
● The fifth type was labelled Resignation. This category is characterized by students’
neglect for the anxiety problem (e.g., giving up, sleeping in class).
that implicit schemas gleaned from prior experiences always impact rational information
evaluations are never wholly based on rational considerations but are always skewed by
As an attempt to react against this problem (TA) Christopher L and others (2017)
highlight the need of creating a multifaceted intervention model that assists emotion
management and self-control skill development to reduce the negative effect of cognitive test
In other words, Christopher’s suggestion take the lead off emotional intelligence one
EI and entails a historical background of the concept , its components and explores EI
Emotional intelligence is controversy term that has been invested in the literature
since the mid-nineties , Bar-On (2006) states that the construct of EI was presented about a
century ago. , The concept of Emotional intelligence was first introduced by Abraham
Maslow in the 1950s (Dhani , Priyam 2021) .However, Golman is considered as the father of
emotional intelligence considering that the construct gained its popularity from the book
of Goleman: Emotional Intelligence Why it can matter more than IQ (1995). Goleman has
also write several similar works that emphasized the understanding of the construct( Salovey
and Mayer1990 , p.189 ) defined it as the" We define emotional intelligence as the subset of
social intelligence that involves the ability to monitor one's own and others' feelings and
emotions, to discriminate among them and to use this information to pilot one’s thoughts and
21
actions” the analysis of this definition reflects major capacities: perceiving, using,
understanding, and managing emotions Although These capacities are different yet they are
associated ,
Ryback (1998) declared that Emotional intelligence can be interpret as the ability to
utilize your sensitivity and awareness to recognise the feelings in the interpersonal
communication, and to withstand the urge to react without thinking , instead it allow to
respond from receptivity, authenticity and candour. (Farnham,2001) view that EI can be
abilities.
or are just studying to hone your leadership abilities. Emotional intelligence has been studied
three categories: social intelligence, which deals with managing and understanding other
objects. Thorndike defines social intelligence as the capacity to understand one's own
behavior as well as that of others and to successfully use that knowledge in social settings.
According to Kaufman (2001), both intellectual and non-intellectual elements have an impact
on a person's ability. Both sorts of factors also have an affect on one's intelligence
The word "EI" has been used on occasion since at least the mid-twentieth century.
Jane Austen's literary work "Pride and Prejudice" mentions various characters who have the
quality of EI (Van Ghent 1953, p. 106-107). The scientific evidence References can be traced
22
and fosters social and personal development in general (Beasley 1987, Payne 1986). In the
1980s, psychologists addressed the concept of multiple intelligence with newfound openness
(Gardner 1983, Sternberg 1985). Meanwhile, research into how emotions and cognition
interact was on the rise. It was amid these active enquiries that the first scientific studies on
EI began to appear (Mayer, et al, 1990).Because of the topic's popularization in the late
According to Mathew et al. (2002), several researchers, including Peter Salovey and
Jack Mayer, have written scholarly papers in the past. articles regarding EI in peer-reviewed
journals, and Reuven Baron claims to have utilized an emotional quotient notion in an
unpublished PhD dissertation that is difficult to find. So Goleman (1995, 1998, 2001) has
been the most significant in popularizing the concept of EI. Nonetheless, Goleman's (1995)
definition of EI was critiqued as being too broad because it includes features that trained
2002). For example, (Goleman, 1995, p. 34) mentions the ability to inspire oneself, to be
persistent when faced with frustrations, to defer gratification and control urge, to keep stress
at bay and regulate one's own moods, to hope and sympathize.Criticism of the definition
prompted concerns about whether EI is a novel concept or an old one (Mathew, 2002). With
the enchantment of this new phrase and the excitement of discovering the potential of this
new intellect, the Many others utilized the word, although in very diverse ways (Bar-On
1997, Elias et al. 1997, Goleman 1995, Mayer & Salovey 1993, Picard 1997). As a result, the
concepts of EI: trait EI and ability EI. First, trait EI conceptualize EI as a constellation of
personality traits and relatively stable parts of behaviour that facilitate the recognition,
processing and managing emotive situations such as enthusiasm, motivation.the second type,
ability EI is defined as the adaptive application of feelings that allows an individual to solve
problems and effectively adapt to their environment (German ,et al, 2019).
1.2.4.1Self-Awareness
Self-awareness is a complex term to define since multiple definitions have been made
for it (Sutton at al 2015). Eriksen (2009) defined it as the capacity to have conscious
knowledge about one’s self, convictions, assumptions, principles, and emotions and their
understand one’s assumptions , emotions , beliefs , and values on an ongoing basis, with the
goal, checking outcomes, and redirecting unsuccessful efforts (Berk, 2003). It includes the
capacity to maintain the focus on the desired results and to prevent destruction . The ability
to self-regulate has been viewed as a desirable quality throughout history because of its
Social skills are the tools that enable people to communicate, learn, ask for help, get
needs met in appropriate ways, get along with others, make friends, develop healthy
relationships, protect themselves, and in general, be able to interact with the society
harmoniously (Down at al 2017). A social skill is any ability that ameliorate the interactive
process by creating social standards , socialization is the attempt to learn and apply these
skills . However, if these skills are neglected social breakdown will occur.
1.2.4.4 Motivation
712).Motivation stands for reasons that prime behavior that is distinguished by desire and
disposition . There are two types of motivation Intrinsic motivation which is characterized
and principles.
1.2.4.5 Empathy
Empathy is the ability to understand or feel what another person is experiencing from within
their frame of reference, that is, the ability to put oneself in another's position (bullet ,and
Types of empathy include cognitive empathy, emotional (or affective) empathy, somatic
levels of alexithymia can have difficulty distinguishing and appreciating the emotions of
26
al, 2013 ).”High levels of alexithymia occur in approximately 10% of the population and can
disorder”(Taylor ,1997,p.67) .Difficulty with recognizing and talking about their emotions
appears at subclinical levels in men who conform to cultural notions of masculinity (such as
thinking that sadness is a feminine emotion). This is called normative male alexithymia by
some researchers (karren 2014) .However, both alexithymia itself and its association with
Alexithymia is a disorder that can affect people who are on the low end of the
alexithymia. Alexithymia is a disorder that can affect people who are on the low end of the
alexithymia. Alexithymia is a disorder that can affect people who are on the low end of the
alexithymia (Edmonds, 2022 ) .(Parker, et al, 2010) viewed that although the conceptions are
distinct, they have a lot in common and are inversely connected. Alexithymia is a type of
deficit in emotion processing and regulation, which has a detrimental effect on emotional
1.2.6.1 Leadership
leader has to be a source of inspiration and catalyst for the employees to improve their
working conditions. A leader must be emotionally intelligent he must have the ability to read
people emotions and needs never being told , The premise of emotional intelligence in
leadership is that emotional intelligence should be the premise of leadership. Before tasks,
followers, goals and styles can be defined or critiqued, the leader’s emotional intelligence
Parker and others (2005) tested the effect of emotional intelligence on the effective
students reported significantly higher amounts of several different emotional and social
competencies. These findings emphasize that emotional intelligence plays an important role
in the successful transition from high school to university. Farooq (2003) claimed that
students with high emotional intelligence show better academic performance than the
Emotional intelligence is a predictor to one of the most important human life value
that is life satisfaction a key to well-being , inner peace and self esteem Several studies have
examined the relationship between EI and life satisfaction (Bar-On, 1997;Ciarrochi, Chan, &
Caputi, 2000; Martinez-Pons, 1997, 1999; Mayer et al., 2000a) .(Benjamin Palmer et al 2002)
examined the relationship between emotional intelligence and life satisfaction the findings
show that the two construct are significantly correlated .beside the study of Ciar-rochi et al.
(2000) that shown the EI correlation with life satisfaction (r=0.22, P<0.05) even after
Managing for IQ and personality variables suggesting that EI accounts for unique variance.
28
1.2.6.4 Anxiety
Anxiety is an emotional arousal that can harm human life process , it affects the way
he react and respond in the situations of challenge and assessment , it unlock his potentials
effectively with emotions, stress and Anxiety since it includes the capacity to recognise and
control feelings in other words to identify all negative emotions of stress and anxiety and to
use them to obtain positive outcomes .Studies carried out with nursing students by Montes-
reduces the detrimental effects of stress. They looked at how perceived emotional intelligence
(PEI), as determined by the Trait Meta-Mood Scale, affects the utilization of stress-relieving
intelligence in anxiety and depression among adolescents The findings support the idea that
awareness of both their own emotions and the emotions of others. It enables instructors, for
instance, to assess a student's mood and gives the teacher the opportunity to thoroughly assess
the environment in the classroom. A teacher may better comprehend their students' behavior
and present thinking by analyzing the emotional components of every event, whether it is
favorable or bad (Goldstein, ,2017). This will keep the students interested in the lesson.
According to Whitaker( 2018) emotional intelligence can be developed and taught in the
classroom by particular steps done by the instructor . First , Educate pupils on the wide range
of emotions first, then help them develop coping mechanisms. «The basic premise that
children must learn about emotions is that all feelings are okay to have; however, only some
29
reactions are okay.”(Daniel Goleman 2004 p 14) Students need to work on maintaining
emotional control. They can practice their reactions by brainstorming potential replies to
various scenarios and then being given the freedom to role play. Second, teach pupils
empathy. Start by asking children to explain the thoughts and feelings of the characters in a
novel to encourage them to see the world from another person's viewpoint . third, In still in
controversy and disagreement. Understanding that you don't always get what you want but
In a further study, the focus of this study is the impact of emotional intelligence on
learning, teaching and Education was conducted by Tevdovska in 2017 it revealed that
emotional intelligence components are needed in individual development and further careers.
The results of the study, according to the participants’ answers and reported average scores, it
is obvious that developing awareness and providing support for emotional intelligence
students and academic achievement (Al-Rabadi, 2012; Bar-On, 2006; Feldmann et al., 2011;
Parker, 2005). Success in adulthood is dependent on cognitive skill, intellectual ability, and
the ability to maintain healthy relationships and regulate emotions. This creates a
fundamental need for the development and implementation of programs and experiences that
can discover the students’ areas of emotional intelligence which need strengthening. It is also
30
important to understand the experiences, both inside and outside of the classroom, that can
Schutte et al. (1998) The researchers hypothesized that emotional intelligence could be used
to predict grade point average for this propose were asked to answer EI scale ,. At the end of
the spring semester, the students’ final grades were collected. Scores on the instrument were
statistically significant in predicting This research aligns with extant literature suggesting that
& Little, 2003). That is, a student with a higher emotional intelligence quotient was predicted
While there is extensive research regarding academic achievement and EI, there is
limited research concerning EI and student development. Low et al. (2004) proposed a
approach to emotional intelligence was based on the theory that students can develop the
ability to identify and express, understand and experience emotions (Nelson, Low, & Nelson,
anger management, and anxiety management. The second competency, personal leadership,
includes the development of social awareness and comfort, empathy, decision making, and
includes drive, time management, commitment and work ethic, and positive change. Finally,
model is based on the Emotional Learning System (ELS) and was utilized in the Javelina EI
Program at a large southern university (Low et al., 2004). Potter (2005) conducted a study of
Emotional Skills Assessment Process (ESAP), was given to both students who would be
involved in the intervention as well as to the control group. During the semester, students
Teaching is the profession that shapes education. It is the essential profession, which makes
all other professions possible, well- qualified, caring and committed. Teachers will improve
curricula, assessments, safe school and highest standards in the world. Emotional intelligence
is the ability to recognize the emotions, their relationships, to reason out and solve the
problems. Teachers' goal is to provide an atmosphere where flow occurs easily and the
students are totally engaged in learning. Here teaching plays a vital role in developing
receives and what also he is giving to others. should get love from his family if does
in a child. As it can lead to physical damage. It should be control in the first stage or
He should give positivity in the groups. Teacher can give team work, develop the
cooperative learning , tell the students about the importance of group learning.
Being Fair :Teacher should be fair. Gentle behaviour should be the part of a teacher to
Free Expression : Atmosphere at home and in school should allow child to freely
Joyful Learning :If lessons are boring, students will not able to enjoy the class and
content should be effectively delivered in the class with the help of different type of
teaching aids.
differences. This would reduce stress and makes the emotion balanced.
Evaluation :Continuous evaluation reduces the stressing child and it provide growth
for the all round development of the child and the teacher should also understand where
This segment is devoted to studies conducted earlier in relation to emotional. All the
studies presented here are the reachable one's to the full knowledge of the
design and study objectives nonetheless they add to the value and enrichment of the current
enquiry.
In his study( Malik, et al, 2013) he aimed to determine the link between emotional
intelligence and test anxiety in higher secondary students enrolled in the Special School
System. 150 students were chosen at random for the sample. The main goal the study was to
determine how emotional intelligence and test anxiety interacted.He found that there is a
correlation (correlation coefficient -0.603) between Emotional Intelligence and Test Anxiety
among students.
Arolin and Ansia (2017) paper offers a viewpoint on the connection between
adolescents' test anxiety and emotional intelligence. The sample (n = 80) was conveniently
drawn from a variety of higher secondary schools in the Trivandrum district of Kerala, and
consisted of youths between the ages of 14 and 16 who were taking their first board test. Both
the Emotional Intelligence Inventory (EII) and the Westside Test Anxiety Scale (WTAS)
were administered. The results shown that test anxiety would be predicted by emotional
intelligence . Test anxiety and emotional quotient were found to be negatively correlated.
intelligence and test anxiety among students the findings revealed that Higher scores on
emotional intelligence traits were associated with lower test anxiety scores. Relative to male
participants, female participants reported higher test anxiety scores, but not emotional
34
intelligence scores. Intrapersonal and interpersonal skills and mood predicted low test anxiety
, while gender , stress management, and adaptability were excluded from the equation.
intelligence and test anxiety. The population was 335 secondary students (154 boys, 181
girls) Their ages of 14 and 17 (M= 15.85, SD=1.47). The Test Anxiety Inventory and the
Emotional Intelligence Appraisal are two self-report tests that were completed by all
anxiety was found through analysis. Test Anxiety and Emotional Intelligence scores have
khaladien (2013) studied the correlation between emotional intelligence , test anxiety,
academic success and self-esteem .The findings revealed significant negative correlations
between students' emotional intelligence and test anxiety, as well as between test anxiety and
academic achievement. There is also a significant positive relationship between their EQ and
self-esteem. academic excellence The findings also revealed that there are significant
negative correlations between students' self-esteem and test anxiety. It was also discovered
that there is no significant difference between male and female students' emotional
intelligence and self-esteem, but there are significant differences in male and female students'
test anxiety, implying that female students' test anxiety was greater than male students.
adolescents at times of test anxiety and academic stress. To test the theory, 250 teenagers
between the ages of 18 and 23 who had a non-clinical history of stress and anxiety were
selected from the various colleges in the Kashmir valley. The sample was made up equally of
boys and girls. Using the emotional intelligence scale by Schute et al. measures, the intensity
of emotions was measured in response to all variables (test anxiety and academic stress). The
35
gender differences in emotional intelligence and test anxiety were significant when our
Conclusion
prior research conducted about Emotional intelligence and students’ test anxiety, which serve
in finding answers for the study’s questions. The following chapter is concerned with
research methodology
36
Introduction
This chapter presents an overview of the methodology plan, the research design and
approaches. It aims to describe population, the data collection, the instrument used , ethical
which this research was first set , an accurate design must be undertook
. The current study opts for the descriptive design since the research does not attempt
future outcomes. Instead, it focuses on providing a detailed and accurate presentation of the
data collected. That is to say, it aims at describing the levels of the two variable TA and EI
and the correlation coefficient between them without any kind of manipulation. For the
selected for the current research .the type of approach utilized in data collection is
37
quantitative approach since the data collection tools are completely quantitative. As a matter
population situation or phenomenon. It can answers the, what ,where ,when and how
questions but not why question , the present study is conducted to answer the question : what
is the relation ship between EI and TA among students , it investigates this correlation
between the two variables on their accurate state without manipulating them “A descriptive
study is one that is designed to describe the distribution of one or more variables, without
Descriptive studies can be of several types, namely, case reports, case series, cross-sectional
studies, and ecological studies. In the first three of these, data are collected on individuals,
A case report refers to the description of a unique case like patient with an unusual disease or
with simultaneous occurrence of more than one condition. A case series is similar, except that
it is an aggregation of multiple (often only a few) similar cases. Many case reports and case
series are anecdotal and of limited value. However, some of these bring to the fore a hitherto
2.1.1.2Cross-sectional studies
Studies with a cross-sectional study design involve the collection of information on the
presence or level of one or more variables of interest, whether exposure or outcome as they
38
exist in a defined population at one particular time. If these data are analyzed only to
determine the distribution of one or more variables, these are “descriptive.” However, often,
in a cross-sectional study, the investigator also assesses the relationship between the presence
“analytical”
Correlational study examines the connections between two or more variables. Since
correlational studies are not experiments, no variables are not changed or under the
Experimenter’s control. (Kendra cherry ,2022). For the case of the present research the
● positive correlation:
According to positive correlational research, as one variable rises, the other one rises as well.
For Example: Students that study more typically achieves higher grades, if there is a positive
39
● negative correlation:
According to negative correlational study, one variable diminishes as the other one Increases.
For Example: If smoking and lifespan have a negative relationship, it suggests that smokers
● No correlation:
typically ask questions about people’s opinions, beliefs, or behaviours.this tool is the
opted tool for the current study two scales ( TEIQ-SF and WTAS) were used to
Observational Data. This involves observing people in their natural environment and
Existing data sets. This could involve looking at data from previous studies or from
administrative records.
● Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient: This measures the strength of the relationship
● Kendall’s tau: This measures the strength of the relationship between two variables
is a research strategy that focuses on quantifying the collection and analysis of data. It is
formed from a deductive approach where emphasis is placed on the testing of theory, shaped
by empiricist and positivist philosophies. Associated with the natural, applied, formal, and
social sciences this research strategy promotes the objective empirical investigation of
observable phenomena to test and understand relationships. This is done through a range of
quantifying methods and techniques, reflecting on its broad utilization as a research strategy
relationships” ( Alan,2011,p.78).
Quantitative data is any data that is in numerical form such as statistics, percentages. The
researcher analyses the data with the help of statistics and hopes the numbers will yield an
41
unbiased result that can be generalized to some larger population. Qualitative research, on the
other hand, inquires deeply into specific experiences, with the intention of describing and
The current study was conducted at the level of the department of English language and
literature at Mohamed Lamine Debaghine setif 2 ,university . During the school year 2022-
Along this study, different participants contributed to accomplish identifiable objectives, the
role of the participants varied as to, first, allocate and ensure the existence of the research
problem at the exploration phase. Second, pilot testing the research tools. Third, participating
For the purpose of appointing the research problem, fifteen students volunteered to undergo
an FGD. Besides that, an interview which was conducted with two teachers who were
consent to answer our questions, both tools (FGD and the interview) three students
Five volunteers out of the entire population and aside of the sample were administered the
research tools ( the tow scales TEIQ-SF and WSTAS) in order to verify wording of the
questionnaire , the required time for them to be answered , and the clarity of their items
Eighty students from the master one groups were chosen to represent the entire population
In alignment with the impossibility of random sampling due to the fact that administrating
Two questionnaire one of them with thirty questions would be a time consueming for student
This means not all students accepted to answer the scales . Hence, purposeful convenience
Sampling was the natural choice the participants were selected base of their convenience
Master one students at the department of English language and literature at Mohamed Lamine
Debaghine , setif 2 university presents the population if this research in a total number of 362
The population was neatly selected , considering the fact that master one students are mature
sufficient language proficiency to understand the elements of the scales what facilitate the
The sample under investigation consists of eighty students, they were selected with no
Consideration of their gender or age and they were of both specialities language sciences
and literature and civilization , the same students answered the two scales at the same time
fore the reason that the two scales mast be answered by the same person to obtain a reliable
data , and it would be difficult to to address the second scales to the same persons that
in order to obtain a holistic picture of the problem being investigated and to ensure its
existence among master one students , purely qualitative tools were utilized during the
exploration phase . for that , a FGD and interview were employed . thereafter , in order to
collect the neccesery data that enobles exploring the relationship beteew the tow variables
43
the two scales _ (TEIQU-SF) as a tool of measuring EI and( WTAS)as a tool of measuring
“A focus group is a small group interview with participants who have other
responses to queries posed by the researcher or assessor are investigated” ( Williams , 2010,p
177” In market research for example , focus groups are used to better understand consumers'
Discussions may be facilitated or unmediated. Focus groups can be used in market research
to examine how a group reacts to a novel good or service. They can elicit lessons learned and
suggestions for performance improvement as a tool for program evaluation. The goal is for
the researcher to comprehend the responses of the participants. It is possible to anticipate that
group members' reactions will reflect the opinions of the greater population if they are
method that researchers organize to collect qualitative data through interactive and directed
discussions.
Pilot test "is a procedure in which a researcher makes changes in an instrument based on
feedback from a small number of individuals who complete and evaluate the instrument
(cresswell, 2012) .Effective pilot testing requires choosing a sample of people who are
similar or part of the test target audience (Miller, McIntyre lovler 2011) pilot testing helps
increasing validity and reliability of results obtained from research instruments (lodicoet al
44
2006). The table below demonstrate the changes occurred after the pilot test in this
The table below demonstrate the changes occurred after the pilot test:
Five master one students from the entire population volunteered to undergo the FGD. The
latter lasted half an hour which was not recorded because of the refusal of the participants
All the members of the group belong to the same population that helps obtain worthy views
about their perception about TA and the strategies they use to minimize its levels . Personal
points of view are better clarified end filtered bias during the process of discussion The
reason behind utilizing the FGD by means of helping the researcher allocating. The problem
is that FGDs helps obtaining variety of points of view based on an organized interaction
In the social sciences, semi-structured interviews are a common research technique. A semi-
structured interview is more open and allows for new ideas to be raised as a result of what the
45
interviewee says than a structured interview, which has certain questions from which one
free-flowing, and similar to a conversation you would have every day. Every interviewee
The loosely organized questions allow respondents more freedom to fully express
modifications is order to obtain suitable final version. The following adjustment took
place
In order to get our opinions and further insights beyond those drawn from the FGD, a semi-
structured interview with five teachers of master students was devised for the purposes
exploring the teachers perception of the current state of attention to EI and TA and moreover,
to look into their insight about the possibility of promoting EI components at classroom . The
interview lasted about fifteen minutes for each teacher . one of them is tape recorded the
in an effort to assemble the required date to explore the students levels of EI and TA
two different scales were devised the first one is (TEIQU-SF) and the second is (WTAS)
instrument developed to measure global trait emotional intelligence. Based on the Trait
The TEIQue consists of 30 items, each of which is assessed from 1 ("Strongly disagree")
to 7 ("Strongly agree") on a Likert scale. Scores are obtained for the global trait EI, four
motivation (content with life),Social skills (interacting with others ), empathy (influence
by other people's feelings), are all componants of EI. The Emotionality factor contains
the aspects of Emotion perception (including self and others), Emotion expression
47
emotions), stress management (control of stress), and impulse control are all components
Regardin the reliability and the validity of the instrument, a sample investigated by
Memar (2002) to determine validity and reliability for TEIQue, internal consistency and
test-retest both indicated scale reliabilities of 0.71 and 0.76. High correlations between
the TEIQue with Shrink’s Emotional Intelligence Scale showed validity in measuring
the Westside a quick screening tool Test Anxiety Scale is used to find students who
have anxiety-related academic difficulties. Ten elements make up the scale, and
administering it takes between five and eight minutes. School counselors have made use of it.
over many years, and in three different study initiatives, it has served as the main indicator of
anxiety. therefore school initiatives are the goal of the current inquiry.can trust its
applications and better comprehend its characteristics.( Richard Driscoll ,2004). The
Westside scale picks up performance impairment and intrusive worry: Impairment (memory
Items #2, 3, 7, 9 The scale is constructed to measure anxiety impairments, with most items
asking directly about performance impairment or about worrying, which interferes with
concentration
It is with no sense to pilot test these tools for two reasons .First, the TEIQu-SF is already a
short form that contains 30 items in comparison to the original version that contains 160 item
For the Westside test anxiety scale the three students that volunteered to pilot test the
instruments reported that the scale is brief, clear and understandable therefore no adaptations
are made . Second, both of the scales do not require writing or profound reflection
After the exploration phase, the tow scales (TEIQU-SF) and (WTAS) were administered
to the total sample (eighty master one students) as to attain the needed data concerning
the enquiry of the students levels of TA and EI and to investigate the relationship
between the two variables, both scales were administered at the same time since that
they must be answered by the same students and it is likely that some participant would
Both questionnaire took about 40 minutes to be answered ; “30 minutes for the
(TEIQU-SF) and 10 minutes for (WTAS) , all the administered copies of the scales were
collected back fully answered and the students were informed about the confidentiality
According to yin (1994) , data analysis resets on the principle of giving sense to the gathered
The exploration phase included the utilization of qualitative tool FGD with students
and interviews with teachers, the tools are transcribed and analyzed subsequently research
The quantitative data of the(TEIQU-SF) and the (WTAS) are analyzed by SPSS the
determination of the correlation possibility was done by spearmans 's correlation coefficient.
Ethicalness is central to any research procedure .therefore, all participants were given
the choice to volunteer or not in this study and the choice to answer the scales or not .
submitted at the level of the English department to conduct the curren study . finally, the
ethics of the researcher as to preserve the data obtained mostly secured from any kind of
changes that may serve the researcher’s personal objectives was emphasised
Conclusion
In this chapter, the research design , the instruments ,the tool administration, the
description of the materials used in research the description of the correlational design, data
collection and analysis procedures molded the methodological framework realized in the
50
discussion of the findings and recommendations and implications obtained from these results.
.
51
52
2.9.1 Pilot Test of The TEIQP And Westside Test Anxiety Scale
It is with no sense to pilot test these tools for two reasons .First, the TEIQP is
already a short form and each group of questions in it measure a specific aspect of emotional
intelligence. For the Westside test anxiety scale the three volunteered students to pilot test
the instruments reported that the scale is brief, clear and understandable therefore no
adaptations are made . Second , both scale are a self-reporting scales that have to do with
personal affirmations and both of the do not require writing or profound reflection.
disagree") to 7 ("Strongly agree") on a Likert scale. Scores are obtained for the global trait EI,
four components, and 15 aspects. The aspects of self-esteem (which denotes confidence), trait
happiness (content with life), and trait optimism make up the wellbeing factor (hopefulness).
Social awareness (social skills), emotion management (influencing other people's feelings),
and assertiveness (standing up for one's rights) are all aspects of the sociability factor. The
Emotionality factor contains the components of Emotion perception (including self and
and Trait Empathy (seeing things from other people's perspectives). Emotion regulation
(control of emotions), stress management (control of stress), and impulse control are all
A very quick screening tool called the Westside Test Anxiety Scale is used to find
pupils who have anxiety-related academic difficulties. Ten elements make up the scale, and
administering it takes between five and eight minutes. School counselors have made use of
it.over many years, and in three different study initiatives, it has served as the main indicator
of anxiety.the instrument, therefore school initiatives are the goal of the current inquiry.can
trust its applications and better comprehend its characteristics.( Richard Driscoll ,2004).
According to yin (1994) , data analysis resets on the principle of giving sense to the
The exploration phase included the utilization of qualitative tool FGD with students
and interviews with teachers, the tools are transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis
The quantitative data of the emotional intelligence scale and the test anxiety scale are
analyzed by the statistical package for social sciences the determination of the correlation
possibility was done by speatmans 's correlation coefficient. then, Cronbach reliability
Conclusion
In this chapter, the research design , the instruments ,the tool administration, the
description of the materials used in research the description of the correlational design, data
collection and analysis procedures molded the methodological framework realized in the
discussion of the findings and recommendations and implications obtained from these results.
Chapter Three
Introduction
This chapter is dedicated to the analysis of the data collected from both qualitative
and quantitative tools , the findings are to be interpreted in relation to the review of the
55
literature . In light of these findings , a solution for the research problem based on providing
answers to research questions and hypothesis proof or denial. finally, possible pedagogical
This section entails analysis of data obtained from the qualitative tools followed by
This section comprises of the use of thematic analysis of the data collected from the
1.1.1.1 Analyzing of the Focus Group Discussion. Concerning the first question, first
and test taking , the majority of them (nine students ) claimed to go through this
condition of anxiety during tests , whereas the rest (six students) affirmed that they
suffer From anxiety before, during and even after tests , what matches what
which people experience extreme distress and anxiety in testing situations. While
many people experience some degree of stress and anxiety before and during
exams, test anxiety can actually impair learning and hurt test performance.1 Test
a good performance counts, people can become so anxious that they are actually
unable to do their best , and what Namati (2012) said that Test anxiety as an aspect
uneasiness during, before, and after a certain exam . Regarding the second
56
question, students believed that the reason for test anxiety is mainly the importance
of exams and tests. They agreed that they feel less anxious when the module they
are being tested in is not a module with a high coefficient. In addition to that ,
the parents. Students also mentioned that the timing of tests plays a role in
increasing test anxiety since they take all exams in the same period ( some time in
one week ) which consists with the reasons mentioned before in literature that
test irrelevant thoughts, and other physical symptoms relating to anxiety while
environment like the importance of the task,, atmosphere, the given time ,examiner
attitudes physical setting can affect the level of anxiety felt by the student (salend
s j 2012. Putwain at al 2010). For the third question first year master students claim
more study efforts to ensure themselves that they are well prepared , answering
their self-confidence and hinder feelings of fear that concurs with what David
Shinji Kondo (1997) suggested that basic strategies for managing test anxiety are
and Concentration . For the Last question , students confirmed that some teachers
environment talking about the test and ensuring students that it will include only
what have been seen in lessons , proving students with study materials and
57
teachers should implement setting goals in the classroom, show students how to
effectively prepare for tests, teach how to control stress, and provide motivational
less likely to fall down the spiral of negative thinking from one or two bad
Analysis of the Interview. In the first question both teachers claimed to use a
main strategy to moderate students' test anxiety that is to ensure them and to
guarantee that the test and the rebricks have been rehearsed and that the test will
be break down to small tasks , one teacher added that encouraging preparation
and creating a positive learning environment is crucial to hinder students fear of
exams matching what coleman (2014) suggested that Encourage students to
remind themselves of the positives attributes they hold; focus on creating realistic
plans of actions for finding and reaching students’ individual goals; congratulate
students’ progress, even if the end goal is not yet met; use descriptive feedback,
for example, say “You set up the equations correctly!” instead of “Good job”; do
not compare progress between students; and use practice tests to boost confidence.
For the second question , both teachers answered yes and added that it is a way of
creating a friendly atmosphere saini (2021) said that There must be positive
atmosphere in the class. Creating a proper atmosphere is important for learner to
flourish. So, it is important to have a healthy positive atmosphere to develop
emotional intelligence. For the third question , one teacher stated that he tries to
keep students motivated by participating in study materials , offering guidance ,
encouraging communications, and promoting collaboration among learners . the
other teacher affirmed that she focuses on using nice expressions with students ,
tolerating wrong answers and assigning the type of activities they like, According
to self-determination theory, there are three basic psychological needs that are
fundamental for motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2020):
Autonomy
Competence
58
Relatedness
Relatedness refers to the students’ sense of belonging and connection. Build this
by establishing relationships .Facilitate peer connections by using team-building
exercises and encouraging collaborative learning. Develop your own relationship
with each student. Explore student interests to develop common ground
. For the forth questions, one teacher reported that discipline and self regulation
are not to be taught in a conventional way . However, they are to be seen through
the teacher himself and practiced when the teacher is always making rewards .
The second teacher emphasized the importance of declaring a moral code to be
respected by both teacher and students right from the beginning. For the Last
question both teachers agreed that social skills are not to be taught but to be
acquired. However, the first teacher added that a teacher plays a role of monitor
that is his duty to implement and or to correct any social skill that is needed and
that will help the educational process including: model appropriate behavior, great
opportunities for interaction, teach empathy and encourage self-reflection.
according ,to Down at al (2017 ) Social skills are the tools that enable people to
communicate, learn, ask for help, get needs met in appropriate ways, get along
with others, make friends, develop healthy relationships, protectthemselves, and in
general, be able to interact with the society harmoniously
This section incorporates the validity and reliability of the research instruments, a
description and analysis of the collected data in addition to examination of the hypothesis of
research.
59
Table 3.1
administered to first year master students is reliable . The observed value of the Cronbach’s
alpha is 0.928 which is superior to 0.70 therefore the scale can be considered as reliable.
1.1.1.3 VALIDITY of (TEIQUE SF). To prove that the research instrument (TEIQUE-
Table 3.2
0,963 30 TEIQue_SF
Displays the extent to which the emotional intelligence scale (TEIQUE SF)
administered to first year master students is valid. The observed value of the Cronbach’s
alpha is 0.928 which is superior to 0.60 therefore the scale can be considered as valid.
60
The TEIQue and TEIQue-SF are part of a set of measures based on the trait EI model
that include questionnaires for children, adolescents, and adults (Petrides, 2009). The TEIQue
has been adapted to other languages and studied regarding its validity, showing similar results
et al., 2008), Chinese-speaking Hong Kong, English-speaking Hong Kong, and English-
speaking UK (Gökçen et al., 2014), Catalan (Aluja et al., 2016), Italian (Chirumbolo et al.,
2019), Turkish (Ulutas, 2019), Lebanese (Sanchez-Ruiz et al., 2021) what demonstrate that it
1.1.1.4 Reliability of the Westside Test Anxiety Scale. To prove that the
research instrument the Westside test anxiety scale is reliable alpha Cronbach value was
measured.
Table 3.3
Displays the extent to which the westside test anxiety administered to first year master
students is reliable. The observed value of the Cronbach’s alpha is 0.934 which is superior to
research instrument Westside test anxiety scale is valid alpha Cronbach value was
measured.
61
Table 3.4
0,966 10 WTAS
Displays the extent to which the Westside test anxiety administered to first year
master students is valid. The observed value of the Cranach’s alpha is 0.966 which is superior
to 0.70 therefore the scale can be considered as reliable. According to Discoll (2004) The
consistent correlations in two separate populations between changes on the Westside scale
and changes in test performance indicate that the scale is a reliable indicator of performance
impairment. Similar results were attained with college students, many on academic probation,
and with 5th grade students, most in good standing, suggesting that the scale is a reliable
measure across quite different population samples. The .44 coefficient of validity is high by
current standards. Some of that may be due to the scale itself, which combines interfering
cognitions with experienced impairment and thereby covers the most pertinent factors and
omits the marginal ones. Yet much of the higher coefficient should be reasonably attributed
to the use of change scores for the validation, instead of the usual method of correlating
stationary scores. Given significant changes in anxiety levels and in performance, decreases
on a valid measure of anxiety impairment should correlate to performance gains, as was the
case here. Taken together, the research indicates that the Westside Test Anxiety Scale is a
62
reliable and valid measure of test-anxiety impairment. As the instrument is brief and easily
administered, is public access and free of charge to schools, and is seen to be a reliable and
Table 3.5
TEIQue_SF WTAS
students1 165 20
students2 30 50
students3 180 40
students4 30 50
students5 30 50
students6 131 20
students7 74 25,92
students8 102,91 36
students9 31 48
students10 120 30
students11 150 40
students12 141,03 13
students13 116,42 16
students14 138 26
students15 191 43
students16 115 32
students17 116,66 26,97
students18 123 38
students19 120,11 33
students20 144 50
63
students21 77 34
students22 133 34
students23 129 20
students24 139 26,76
students25 138 34
students26 98,22 30,94
students27 131 43
students28 146 26,97
students29 124,3 27
students30 119,07 45
students31 125,36 20
students32 118,57 17
students33 130,3 25
students34 113 42
students35 146,81 12
students36 152,39 21,05
students37 105,58 45
students38 130,63 10
students39 127,22 14
students40 120 30
students41 90 40
students42 140,32 16
students43 130,49 36
students44 30 10
students45 172,94 46
students46 132,15 26
students47 93,76 28
students48 109,27 45
students49 92 32
students50 112,05 24
64
students51 53 20
students52 74 30
students53 130 10
students54 118 27
students55 117 40
students56 83,84 26
students57 109 20
students58 90 40
students59 54 45
students60 195 15
students61 176 16
students62 129,36 10
students63 129,89 13
students64 128 33
students65 117 14
students66 139 44
students67 150,15 36
students68 126,7 14
students69 131 37
students70 91 27
students71 123 19
students72 99,01 31,97
students73 114 41
students74 108,11 35
students75 90,94 28
students76 122 35
students77 128,16 39
students78 111,62 29,66
students79 130 25
65
The table shows students’ scores in test anxiety and emotional intelligence ,it appears
that highest score reported in emotional intelligence is 191 and the lowest score reported is
30 while the highest score reported in test anxiety is 50 and lowest score reported is 10.
66
Figure 3.1
research instruments Westside test anxiety scale and the emotional intelligence scale
(TEIQUE SF) as statistical means ,std derivations it also presents skewness and kurtosis in
68
order to determine whether the data follows a normal order or not since the statistical tests
as kilimanjaro f Smirnoff Shapiro and wilk count on statistical significance which is related
Table 3.5
Std.
N Mean Deviation Skewness Kurtosis
Statist Statisti Statist Std. Statist Std.
ic c Statistic ic Error ic Error
TEIQUE_SF 80 117,17 34,65152 -0,708 0,269 1,151 0,532
90
WTAS 80 29,664 11,31007 0,006 0,269 -0,950 0,532
5
80
It appears from the results of the table that the value of the mean (Mean) for
WTAS arithmetic mean value is 29,665 at a standard deviation of 11.34 Also, the skewness
coefficients for the (TEIQue_SF) variable do not range between the range [+1.1] and the
Kurtosis coefficient ranges between the range [+3.3]. This indicates that the data of the
(TEIQue_SF) variable does not follow the normal distribution.Also, the skewness
coefficients for the (WTAS) variable ranged between the range [+1.1] and the Kurtosis
coefficient ranged between the range [+3.3]. This indicates that the data of the (WTAS)
variable followed the normal distribution and through the above. We use Spearman's
end test anxiety among Master 1 students at the significance level α = 0.0
Figure 3.2
Table 3.6
Correlations
TEIQue_
SF WTAS
Spearman's TEIQue_ Correlation 1,000 -0,228
rho SF Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed) . 0,042
N 80 80
WTAS Correlation -0,228 1,000
Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed) 0,042 .
70
N 80 80
It appears from the results of the table that the value of the correlation coefficient
between emotional intelligence and test anxiety is equal to -0.228, and this indicates that it is
by a change in test anxiety as well, and the correlation is statistically at a p-value of 0.042.
Because it is the smallest level of significance α = 0.05, and accordingly we reject the null
hypothesis we accept the alternative hypothesis and from it the research hypothesis is
achieved.
● Positive relationship: The closer r is to +1, the stronger the positive linear correlation
between the two variables is. This means that as the values of the first variable
increase, values of the second variable also increase, and vice versa. An r value of
● Negative relationship: The closer r is to -1, the stronger the negative linear
correlation between the two variables is. This means that as the values of the first
variable increase, values of the second variables decrease, and vice versa. An r value
● No relationship: The closer r is to 0, the weaker the linear correlation between the
two variables is. If r is near to zero, this means that there is a random and a nonlinear
relationship between the two variables. In our current study we found that r= .
EI and TTA.
71
First , in order to answer the main question and the sub questions, it is crucial to
discuss the quantitative findings drawn from data analysis .The data collected from research
instruments Westside test anxiety scale and the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire
indicate that there in a negative correlation between test anxiety and emotional intelligence
among first year master students at Mohamed Lamine Debaghine university . Therefore , the
null hypothesis which predicted no significant relationship between test anxiety and
established. Next, answer to second research question was quested for through the focus
group discussions and the teachers’ interview. The answers of students indicates that teachers
play a role in moderating students test anxiety level in addition to the strategies mentioned
by the teachers themselves who claimed to use them to assist their students in hindering their
test anxiety levels . Then, the third question was answered through the discussion of the
interview with teachers in which they reported the possibility to develop components of
emotional intelligence such as self-awareness , social skills and motivation in class through
the use of different teaching strategies With all that being said , it is credibly concluded that
invested in by both students and teachers in order to improve exam performance as a result of
developing emotional control and accordingly lowering test anxiety . Additionally, the high
levels of test anxiety reported by master one students emphasize the necessity to take the
72
overall fear of tests. Additionally, psychologists and applied linguists might provide guidance
In light of findings and the limitations of the study, the following suggestions are
proposed:Since the correlation hypothesis has been established future researches can use
another research design such as quasi experimental design to prove the causality of EI over
TA. Further investigations for EI are possible since it is a new field of research, and its
relation to other variables can be investigated Researchers can investigate the attitude of the
teachers on using EI training in educational setting to improve the students EI or other skills
Limitations of Study
The analysis of qualitative data obtained from exploration phase is under the threat of
researcher bias. Therefore, quantitative data represent a strong support Due to the abstract
nature of the two variables which are test anxiety and emotional Intelligence. Observing and
the validity of results may occur. The scale used to measure emotional intelligence level is
noticed to be lengthy and took students about thirty minutes to answer it and hence disservice
Conclusion
In recapitulation , this chapter included the analysis of data generated from research
procedure including the qualitative tools ( FGD and semi-structured interviews ) that was
analyzed and discussed in addition the quantitative tools both trait emotional intelligence
73
questionnaire and Westside test anxiety scale that was statistically analyzed and presented in
tables and graphs .finally, the relationship between the two variables was statistically
General conclusion
Students who experience anxiety about tests tend to concentrate on things that are
unrelated to the work at hand. According to the inference model of exam anxiety, the ability
performance. Due to this problem, teachers and students pay very little attention to emotional
intelligence, an umbrella phrase for interpersonal and intrapersonal skills that also addresses
positive stress management, mood, and adaptability.the current study was with the aim of
investigating the relationship between emotional intelligence and test anxiety among master
one student at the university of Mohamed lamine Debaghine , setif 2 . Besides , the attempt to
reveal both students and teachers ' perceptions on the role of teachers in moderating students
test anxiety levels and developing components of emotional intelligence (self awareness, self
Moreover, the research was basically embedded within the correlational paradigm to detect
the relationship between emotional intelligence and test anxiety. Furthermore , the
instruments used to collect data varied qualitative and quantitative .The trait emotional
74
intelligence questionnaire and Westside test anxiety scale constituted the main tools to
investigate the relationship between the two variables. The Focus Group Discussions and
semi-structured interviews was utilized in order to generate students and teachers perceptions
on the role of the teacher in moderating students test anxiety levels and developing emotional
intelligence components in the classroom . The main research questions were answered by
the analysis of data collected from research instruments. The null hypothesis was rejected
paving the way for the alternative hypothesis to be confirmed. In conclusion, it is ascertained
that there is a low negative correlation between test anxiety and emotional intelligence among
2015.
Allan Wigfield &Jacquelynne S. Eccles. Test Anxiety in Elementary and Secondary School
Bagby, R.Michael, et al. “The Twenty-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale—I. Item Selection
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022399994900051,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1.
Balogun, A., Balogun, S. K., and Onyencho, O. V. . Test Anxiety and Academic Performance
Balogun, A., Balogun, S. K., and Onyencho, O. V. “.Test Anxiety and Academic
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Baring, L. & Messer, J. A Practical Application of Self-Management for Students Diagnosed
Beasley, K. (1987). The emotional quotient. Br. Mensa Mag., May, p. 25.
Bekomson, A. N., & Mgban T. Baring, L. & Messer, J. Interest in Social Interaction and
Self- Efficacy among Secondary School Students in Cross River State. International
The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 266, no. 13, 2 Oct. 1991, p.
1831, jama.jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/392335/jama_266_13_039.pdf,
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03470130111039.
Bonaccio, S., Reeve, C. L., & Winford, E. C. Test Anxiety on Cognitive Ability Test Can
www.verywellmind.com/what-is-emotional-intelligence-2795423.
Cherry, Kendra. . “Test Anxiety Symptoms”. The New York Times Company. 2012.
Chism, Lisa Astalos, and Morris A. Magnan. “The Relationship of Nursing Students’
Nursing Education, vol. 48, no. 11, 1 Nov. 2009, pp. 597–605,
https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20090716-05. Accessed 11 Sept. 2019.
Colman, Andrew M. A Dictionary of Psychology. 3rd ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press,
2009.
Creswell, C., Waite, P.and Cooper P. Assessment and Management of Anxiety Disorders in
Childhood. 2013.
D Goleman. Emotional Intelligence : Why It Can Matter More than IQ. Bloomsbury, 1995.
Daly, A., Chamberlain, S., & Spalding, V. The Fear Factor: Cognitive and Physiolog- Ical
Components of Test Anxiety in A-Level Mock Exams. Paper Presented at the Annual
Damer, Diana E., and Lauren T. Melendres. ““Tackling Test Anxiety”: A Group for College
Students.” The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, vol. 36, no. 3, Sept. 2011, pp.
David Shinji Kondo and Yang Ying-Ling. Strategies for Coping with Language Anxiety: The
DePhil, M.B., Brilot, B., Nettle, D. Anxiety: An Evolutionary Approach. Canadian Journal of
Psychiatry. 2011.
Dhani, Priyam, and Tanu Sharma. “Emotional Intelligence and Personality : Their
Dowd, Tom P.; Tierney, Jeff. ). Teaching Social Skills to Youth: A Step-By-Step Guide to 182
Basic to Complex Skills plus Helpful Teaching Techniques. Boys Town Press. Oct.
8AD.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ans.0b013e3181fb2e4c.
Eriksen, Matthew. “Authentic Leadership.” Journal of Management Education, vol. 33, no.
29 Sept. 2019.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945212003176?via%3Dihub,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.10.015.
Basic Books.
Goldstein, S. EQ Is Massively More Important than IQ for Leaders. Here’s Why. Retrieved
Guay, F., Chanal, J., Ratelle, C. F., Marsh, H. W., Larose, S., & Boivin, M. Intrinsic,
Hancock, D. R. Effect of Test Anxiety and Evaluative Threats on Students’ Achievement and
Haycock, Laurel A., et al. “Procrastination in College Students: The Role of Self-Efficacy
and Anxiety.” Journal of Counseling & Development, vol. 76, no. 3, July 1998, pp.
2019.
Héfer Bembenutty, and Stuart A Karabenick. Academic Delay of Gratification Scale. 10 Dec.
Hembree, Ray. “Correlates, Causes, Effects, and Treatment of Test Anxiety.” Review of
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001047.
Intelligence: What Would David Wechsler Say? Emotion, 1(3), 258–264. 2001.
Khalid, R., & Hasan, S. S. Test Anxiety in High and Low Achievers. Pakistan Journal of
Psychological Research,. 2009.
Knott, Eleanor, et al. “Interviews in the Social Sciences.” Nature Reviews Methods Primers,
Liebert, Robert M., and Larry W. Morris. “Cognitive and Emotional Components of Test
Anxiety: A Distinction and Some Initial Data.” Psychological Reports, vol. 20, no. 3,
2013.
Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 142, no. 65, May 2019, pp. 53–61,
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886919300480,
Mary Pat Wenderoth. Share OnImplementing an Expressive Writing Intervention for Test
Matthews,G., Zeidner. M, Roberts RD. (2002). Emotional Intelligence: Science and Myth.
Meyer, Barbara B., and Teresa B. Fletcher. “Emotional Intelligence: A Theoretical Overview
Mitchem, K. & Young, K. (. Adapting Self-Management Programs for Entire Class Use:
in Gifted and Non-Gifted High School Students Procedia - Social and University of
Morgan, David L. “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 22, no. 1, Aug. 1996,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129.
Moshe zeidner. An Introduction to the Domain of Test Anxiety. In: Test Anxiety. Perspectives
Nadal, Kevin L. The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Alexithymia SAGE
Nemati, A., & Habibi, P. The Effect of Practicing Pranayama on Test Anxiety and Test
Parker, James D.A, et al. “The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and
Alexithymia.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 30, no. 1, Jan. 2001, pp.
107–115, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00014-3.
Peleg, O. Test Anxiety, Academic Achievement, and Self-Esteem among Arab Adolescents
Debilitating Test Anxiety? Sch. Psychol. Q. 33, 482–491. Doi: 10. 1037/Spq0000236.
Van Ghent D. 1953. The English Novel: Form and Function. New York: Harper &
Row.
Putwain, D. W., Woods, K. A., & Symes, W. Personal and Situational Predictors of Test
Patterns.” British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 77, no. 3, Sept. 2007, pp.
Putwain, David William. “Test Anxiety and GCSE Performance: The Effect of Gender and
pp. 16 43 54.
Test Anxiety and Academic Stress.” Rehabilitation Science, vol. 2, no. 1, 6 Mar.
Salovey, Peter, and John D Mayer. Emotional Intelligence : Key Readings on the Mayer and
Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R.(1990). Test Anxiety. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of
Perspectives and Directions for Future Research. Vision, 12(1), 59–66. 2008, pp.
12(1), 59–66.
Stober, J. &Perkin, R. (2004). Advances in Test Anxiety Research. Anxiety, Stress and
Sujit S. Sansgiry, PhD and Kavita Sail, BS.(2018). Effect of Students’ Perceptions of Course
Association, 2018.
Sutton, Anna, et al.(2020). “A Longitudinal, Mixed Method Evaluation of Self-Awareness
Training in the Workplace.” European Journal of Training and Development, vol. 39,
American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 155, no. 2, 1 Feb. 1998, pp. 264–271,
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9464208,https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.155.2.264.
Thomas, Cathy R., and Shannon A. Gadbois. (2019). “Academic Self-Handicapping: The
www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1348/000709905X79644,
Van Ghent, D. (1953). The English Novel: Form and Function. New York: Harper &
Row.
Von der Embse, Nathaniel, et al.(2019). “Test Anxiety Interventions for Children and
Psychology in the Schools, vol. 50, no. 1, 20 Nov. 2012, pp. 57–71,
Washbush, D. A. & Hill, G. P. (2001). Alliterative Treatments for Children with Attention –
Perfectionism and Test Anxiety.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 52, no.
Dec. 2019.
Procrastination and Anxiety, and Their Relation to Self-Efficacy for Self- Regulated
Learning: Latent Growth Curve Modeling *. Vol. 16, no. 1, 2016, pp. 5–22,
files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1101184.pdf, https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.1.0108.
Zamira Hyseni Duraku,(2017). The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences
Zeidner, Moshe. Test Anxiety: The State of the Art. 1 Jan. 1998. Accessed 3 June 2023.
Appendices
Appendix A
Focus group discussion
the requirements for the degree of master in language sciences . The focus group discussion
will not be recorded. Your name will be kept anonymous in the interview report and your .
Feel free to express your opinions most comfortably., diversity in points of view.
Discussion schedule
● Do you feel anxious about tests ? When do you feel most anxious, befor , during or
● Do you think that teachers play a role in moderating students test anxiety?
Appendix B
Semi-structured interview
the requirements for the degree of master in language sciences . Your name will be kept
anonymous in the interview report and your responses will be highly confidential.
The following questions are meant to explore the possibility to develop EI components
in classroom
5.is it possible to teach social skills in the classroom (interaction for example ), and how ?
Appendix C
__ 2) When I study, I worry that I will not remember the material on the exam.
5 4 3 2 1
__ 3) During important exams, I think that I am doing awful or that I may fail.
5 4 3 2 1
__ 4) I lose focus on important exams, and I cannot remember material that I knew before
the exam.
5 4 3 2 1
__ 5) I finally remember the answer to exam questions after the exam is already over.
5 4 3 2 1
__ 6) I worry so much before a major exam that I am too worn out to do my best on the
exam.
5 4 3 2 1
__ 7) I feel out of sorts or not really myself when I take important exams.
5 4 3 2 1
__ 10) I struggle with writing assignments, or avoid them as long as I can. I feel that
whatever I do will not be good enough.
5 4 3 2 1
_____ Sum of the 10 questions < _____ > Divide the sum by 10. This is your Test
Anxiety score.
© 2004 by Richard Driscoll, Ph.D. You have permission to copy this scale.
Please include author and web address: testanxietycontrol.com/
What does your score mean?
< _____ > Test Anxiety score (from Front).
Recommendations.
We have found that students who score at least 3.0 or more on our scale (at least moderately
high anxiety) tend to benefit from anxiety reduction training, reporting lower anxiety and
improved test scores and class grades.
We recommend a test-anxiety control training. See: TestAnxietyControl.com
Rationale.
The Westside scale picks up performance impairment and intrusive worry:
Impairment (memory loss and poor cognitive processing) — Items #1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10
Worry (catastrophizing) — Items #2, 3, 7, 9
Physiological symptoms — no items.
The scale is constructed to measure anxiety impairments, with most items asking directly
about performance impairment or about worrying, which interferes with concentration.
Symptoms of physiological stress are found to be relatively weak indicators of performance
impairments, and are not included in the scale.
The Westside Scale is found to be a valid measure of anxiety impairment.
See validation research at: TestAnxietyControl.com/research/
See American Test Anxieties Association: www.amtaa.org for further information on test
anxieties.
Appendix D
TEIQue-SF
Instructions: Please answer each statement below by putting a circle around the number
that best reflects your degree of agreement or disagreement with that statement. Do not
think too long about the exact meaning of the statements. Work quickly and try to answer
as accurately as possible. There are no right or wrong answers. There are seven possible
responses to each statement ranging from ‘Completely Disagree’ (number 1) to
‘Completely Agree’ (number 7).
1.........2..........3..........4..........5..........6..........7
Completely Completely
Disagree Agree
1. Expressing my emotions with words is not a problem for me. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2. I often find it difficult to see things from another person’s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
viewpoint.
3. On the whole, I’m a highly motivated person. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4. I usually find it difficult to regulate my emotions. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5. I generally don’t find life enjoyable. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6. I can deal effectively with people. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7. I tend to change my mind frequently. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8. Many times, I can’t figure out what emotion I'm feeling. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
9. I feel that I have a number of good qualities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
10. I often find it difficult to stand up for my rights. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
11. I’m usually able to influence the way other people feel. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
12. On the whole, I have a gloomy perspective on most things. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
13. Those close to me often complain that I don’t treat them right. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
14. I often find it difficult to adjust my life according to the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
circumstances.
15. On the whole, I’m able to deal with stress. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
16. I often find it difficult to show my affection to those close to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
me.
17. I’m normally able to “get into someone’s shoes” and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
experience their emotions.
18. I normally find it difficult to keep myself motivated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
19. I’m usually able to find ways to control my emotions when I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
want to.
20. On the whole, I’m pleased with my life. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
21. I would describe myself as a good negotiator. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
22.I tend to get involved in things I later wish I could get out of. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
23. I often pause and think about my feelings. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
24. I believe I’m full of personal strengths. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
25. I tend to “back down” even if I know I’m right. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
26. I don’t seem to have any power at all over other people’s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
feelings.
27. I generally believe that things will work out fine in my life. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
28. I find it difficult to bond well even with those close to me. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
29. Generally, I’m able to adapt to new environments. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
30. Others admire me for being relaxed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire – Short Form (TEIQue-SF). This 30-item form
includes two items from each of the 15 facets of the TEIQue. Items were selected primarily
on the basis of their correlations with the corresponding total facet scores, which ensured
broad coverage of the sampling domain of the construct. The –SF can be used in research
designs with limited experimental time or wherein trait EI is a peripheral variable.
Although it is possible to derive from it scores on the four trait EI factors, in addition to the
global score, these tend to have somewhat lower internal consistencies than in the full form
of the inventory. The –SF does not yield scores on the 15 trait EI facets.
Scoring information for the TEIQue-SF is available at:
http://www.psychometriclab.com/Home/Default/14 Please note that we cannot
provide any advice on how to run the syntax in SPSS or other statistical software.
Please make sure you read the FAQ section at
http://www.psychometriclab.com/Home/Default/18. In particular, note that we do not
provide free information regarding norms or free feedback reports. Norms and reports are
available for a fee (email admin@teique.com for quotes).
Please note that any and all commercial use of this instrument, or any adapted,
modified, or derivative works thereof, is strictly prohibited.