LSR SV Form Checklists 23 March 2022
LSR SV Form Checklists 23 March 2022
LSR SV Form Checklists 23 March 2022
Date: Purpose
Location:
Task / Activity : The purpose of this Self Verification is to ensure that Work
Permit Number : Activity at the Tangguh Greenfield Site is executed in line with
the Greenfield Construction Control of Work/TEP-930-PRC-
Name of Verifiers : HS-BP4-0002 Procedure and associated relevant
Persons Interviewed or Supervisor: documentation under the CSTS Management System
Sub-Contractor:
Doc. Compliance
Bypassing Safety Controls Comments / Remarks
Reference YES / NO / NA
Are personnel aware of the safety critical equipment that is present within their work
2 location and understand its use?Apakah personel mengetahui peralatan kritis
keselamatan yang ada di lokasi kerja mereka dan memahami penggunaannya?
Are any safety critical systems that have been disabled/ overridden & alternative control
measures clearly communicated to personnel during appropriate moments, e.g. tool-box
4 talk?Apakah ada sistem kritis keselamatan yang telah dinonaktifkan/diganti & tindakan
pengendalian alternatif dikomunikasikan dengan jelas kepada personel pada saat yang
tepat, mis. pembicaraan kotak alat?
Ask personnel what procedure/s should be employed if safety critical equipment needs to
5 be isolated Tanyakan kepada personel prosedur apa yang harus digunakan jika peralatan
kritis keselamatan perlu diisolasi
Ask the supervisor to explain what alternative control measures will be provided if a safety
critical system is isolated to allow work to be performed. Minta penyelia untuk
6
menjelaskan tindakan pengendalian alternatif apa yang akan diberikan jika sistem kritis
keselamatan diisolasi untuk memungkinkan pekerjaan dilakukan.
Are safety critical systems inspected, tested & recorded in compliance with standard
7 operating procedures?Apakah sistem kritis keselamatan diperiksa, diuji & dicatat sesuai
dengan prosedur operasi standar?
Are there records of Safety Critical Equipment being bypassed? Apakah ada catatan
9
Peralatan Kritis Keselamatan yang dilewati?
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
RECOMMENDATION
NO ACTION RESPONSIBLE PERSON TARGET DATE
1
2
3
4
5
TEP Self Verification Record Sheet Rev.0
Date: Purpose
Location:
Task / Activity : The purpose of this Self Verification is to ensure that Work
Permit Number : Activity at the Tangguh Greenfield Site is executed in line with
the Confined Space Entry/TEP-930-PRC-HS-BP4-0016
Name of Verifiers : Procedure and associated relevant documentation under the
Persons Interviewed or Supervisor: CSTS Management System
Sub-Contractor:
Doc. Compliance
Confined Space Entry Comments / Remarks
Reference YES / NO / NA
Have considerations been given to the possibility of eliminating the need for
1 confined space entry?Apakah pertimbangan telah diberikan untuk kemungkinan
menghilangkan kebutuhan untuk masuk ruang terbatas?
Have the necessary permits, entry certificate(s) and isolation documents been
2 completed and posted at the worksite?Apakah izin, sertifikat masuk, dan dokumen isolasi
yang diperlukan telah dilengkapi dan dipasang di tempat kerja?
4 Has a risk assessment been completed? Apakah penilaian risiko telah selesai?
Are all personnel involved in the task aware of the hazards and controls? Apakah semua
5
personel yang terlibat dalam tugas sadar akan bahaya dan pengendaliannya?
Has the Responsible Person (RP) been designated and identified on the permit? Apakah
6
Penanggung Jawab (RP) telah ditunjuk dan diidentifikasi dalam izin?
Are all persons involved in the confined space entry competent and trained? Apakah
7
semua orang yang terlibat dalam entri ruang terbatas kompeten dan terlatih?
Where required, have the neceesary checks on the breathing apparatus been
9 conducted and is it being used? Jika diperlukan, apakah pemeriksaan yang diperlukan
pada alat bantu pernapasan telah dilakukan dan apakah alat tersebut digunakan?
Have the employee obtained authorization to enter the confined space? Sudahkah
10
karyawan memperoleh otorisasi untuk memasuki ruang terbatas?
Has clear communication been established between the entrants and attendant, and
between the attendant and rescue personnel? This may be voice contact, radio, pre-
12 arranged signals, whistles etc. Apakah komunikasi yang jelas telah terjalin antara
pendatang dan petugas, dan antara petugas dan petugas penyelamat? Ini mungkin
kontak suara, radio, sinyal yang telah diatur sebelumnya, peluit, dll.
Have barriers and signage been put in place to prevent unauthorized entry? Apakah
13 penghalang dan tanda telah dipasang untuk mencegah masuknya orang yang tidak
berwenang?
Is a rescue plan in place and responders notified and available? Apakah ada rencana
14
penyelamatan dan responden diberitahu dan tersedia?
Have SIMOPS issues that may conflict with this work been considered? Apakah masalah
15
SIMOPS yang mungkin bertentangan dengan pekerjaan ini telah dipertimbangkan?
Is change management (MOC) used to manage any scope or permit changes? Apakah
16 manajemen perubahan (MOC) digunakan untuk mengelola ruang lingkup atau
mengizinkan perubahan?
Do employees understand that they have the authority and expectation to stop activity if
feel unsafe or find unsafe condition? Apakah karyawan memahami bahwa mereka
17
memiliki wewenang dan harapan untuk menghentikan aktivitas jika merasa tidak aman
atau menemukan kondisi tidak aman?
Did the risk assessment or pre-job discussion include any lessons from past
18 incidents from similar work? Apakah penilaian risiko atau diskusi pra-pekerjaan
memasukkan pelajaran dari kecelakaan kerja serupa?
Has the work crew received positive feedback on raising concerns and
information on what is being done related to concerns raised? Apakah kru kerja
19
menerima umpan balik positif dalam menyampaikan kekhawatiran dan informasi tentang
apa yang sedang dilakukan terkait dengan masalah yang diangkat?
Is there STARRT card for the activity, properly filled and communicated to the crew?
20 Apakah ada kartu STARRT untuk kegiatan tersebut, diisi dengan benar dan
dikomunikasikan kepada kru?
RECOMMENDATION
NO ACTION RESPONSIBLE PERSON TARGET DATE
1
2
3
4
5
TEP Self
Date:
Location:
Sub-Contractor:
Has the STARRT Card been filled correctly and verified all re
3
Sudahkah Kartu STARRT diisi dengan benar dan diverifikasi
Does the Description of the STARRT adequately reflect the w
4 out?
Apakah Deskripsi STARRT cukup mencerminkan pekerjaan y
Has the person who held the STARRT meeting received train
6
Apakah orang yang mengadakan pertemuan STARRT mene
Has the personal fall arrest system follow the project requirem
lanyard, shock absorber,double latch self- locking snap hooks
of synthetic fiber) are they inspected and color coded as per p
3 Apakah personal fall arrest system sesuai dengan persyarata
lanyard, shock absorber, double latch self-locking snap hooks
made of synthetic fiber), apakah diinspeksi dan dikode warna
prosedur proyek?
Do workers NOT tie off to the line of fire, gas lines, instrumen
work less than 3 inches in diameter?
5
Apakah pekerja TIDAK mengikat harness ke jalur berbahaya
instrumen, atau pipa apa pun yang berdiameter kurang dari 3
Are temporary platforms, been inspected regurally by compet
inspection tag being displayed at the main entry?
6
Apakah platform sementara, telah diperiksa secara berkala o
kompeten dan tanda inspeksi ditampilkan di jalur masuk utam
Do workers follow the 3 points contact rule when they are usi
12 Apakah pekerja mengikuti aturan 3 titik kontak ketika mereka
tangga?
Are all equipment, which are less than 5 kg, attached with ma
lanyards when working at height? (for tools weight 5 kg shall
wire use as tools lanyard )
14
Apakah semua peralatan, yang kurang dari 5 kg, terpasang d
yang diproduksi saat bekerja pada ketinggian? (untuk alat be
menggunakan kawat bersertifikat 4 mm sebagai alat lanyard)
Are tool bags for lifting/hoisting attached SWL and rope with d
and proper safe knot for manual hoisting? And are the areas
exclusive zone/dropped zone?
15
Apakah tas peralatan untuk mengangkat tercantum SWL dan
dengan diameter 12 -15 mm dan simpul aman untuk pengang
apakah area di bawah ini dibarikade untuk zona eksklusif/zon
Are cables, hoses, and leads elevated above 1.8 meter with p
to minimize tripping and tangling hazards, and blocking acces
17 Apakah kabel, selang, dan timah dinaikkan di atas 1,8 meter
kabel yang tepat untuk meminimalkan bahaya tersandung da
memblokir akses?
NO ACTION
1
2
3
4
5
TEP Self Verification Recor
……………………………………………………….…..)
NG AT HEIGHT
h fall prevention, such as guard rail with mid rail and toe
r anchor points?
api dengan pencegahan jatuh, seperti handrail dengan rel
antai anti slip, atau titik angkur?
ESS/WORKER PROTECTION
ment identified and required for the specific task avaialble,
y for use? e.g Spill Kit, Fire extinguisher, Eye Wash, First
ripod, Gottcha rescue kits, etc)
an darurat diidentifikasi dan diperlukan untuk tugas khusus
ertifikasi dan siap digunakan? Contoh Spill Kit, Fire
h, First Aid Kit, Stretcher dan sebagainya.
RECOMMEND
ACTION
ation Record Sheet
Purpose
Doc.
Reference
CoW
Procedure
CoW
Procedure
CoW
Procedure
CoW
Procedure
CoW
Procedure
CoW
Procedure
CoW
Procedure
CoW
Procedure
CoW
Procedure
CoW
Procedure
CoW
Procedure
CoW
Procedure
5.1.1.
5.4
5.4.4
5.4.4
5.5.6
5.1.3
5.3.1
5.7
5.8
5.3.6
Appendix 3
Ladder safety
Appendix 3
Step-ladder
5.6.1
5.5.3
5.6.1.
5.7
5.3.1.
5.5.2
5.7
5.6.2
5.3.5.
5.3.5.
5.3.5.
Actual Check
on-site
Actual Check
on-site
Actual Check
on-site
Actual Check
on-site
RECOMMENDATION
Record Sheet
Purpose
Comments / Remarks
Percentage of Implementaion
ECOMMENDATION
RESPONSIBLE PERSON
Rev.0
Compliance
YES / NO / NA
#DIV/0!
TARGET DATE
TEP Self
Date:
Location:
Task / Activity / aktivitas
Permit Number / Nomor Permit
Name of Verifiers / Pemeriksa
Persons Interviewed or Supervisor:
Sub-Contractor:
Process, Plan or Procedure to be Verifie
CONTRACTOR CONTROL of WORK for GREEN
(TEP-930-PRC-HS-BP4-0002_B07)
DOCUMENTS/ADMINISTRATION /POLICY/ PROCEDU
Is there STARRT card for the activity, properly filled and com
9 crew?
Are at least 2 members of the work force able to identify at le
hazards and controls on the STARRT sheet (Not counting the
INDEPENDANTLY questioned?
10 Apakah setidaknya 2 anggota angkatan kerja dapat mengide
setidaknya 50% dari bahaya dan kontrol pada lembar STARR
termasuk Supv) ketika dipertanyakan secara INDEPENDEN?
Are Permit Holder (PH) able to explain what task will be carrie
the requirement is to conduct the work in safe manner?
18 Apakah Permit Holder (PH) menjelaskan tentang pekerjaan y
dilaksanakan dan persyaratan kerja amannya?
Have Permit Holder (PH) and Operating Authority (OA) visited
location prior to sign or renew the Permit to work as per Proce
19 requirement?
Sudahkah Permit Holder (PH) dan Operating Authority (OA) m
kerja sebelum menandatangani sesuai dengan persyaratan ?
Has the hot work inside the confined space been completed w
permit and attached to a confined space entry permit? (if any
21 Apakah kerja panas di dalam ruang terbatas sudah dilengkap
kerja panas tambahan dan dilampirkan di ijin kerja masuk rua
NO ACTION
1
2
3
4
5
TEP Self Verification Recor
an or Procedure to be Verified
ONTROL of WORK for GREENFIELD
30-PRC-HS-BP4-0002_B07)
TRATION /POLICY/ PROCEDURE
s
rendah ijin kerja tidak dibutuhkan. Apakah dokumen
h lengkap, seperti:
setujui
h disetujui
k;
Confined Space Entry, and Excavation Permit;
y and Create Opening.
k, yang digunakan di lokasi, masih valid sesuai
Work? (periksa validitas kapan hari pertama PTW
an Dingin;
Panas, Ruang Terbatas, dan Ijin Penggalian;
afi dan Create Opening.
RECOMMEND
ACTION
ication Record Sheet
Purpose
The purpose of this Self Verification is to ensure t
Activity at the Tangguh Greenfield Site is executed in
Contractor Control of Work for Greenfield and as
relevant documentation under the CSTS Manageme
Doc.
Reference
Section 3.1
Section 8.2
Appendix 4
Section 8.2
Section 8.2
Section 4.5
Section 4.5
Section 3.1
Section 3.1
Section 6
Section 5.3
Section 8.3
Section 4.5
Section 8.2
Section 7
Section 7
Section 8.4
Section 5.3
Section 4.2
Section 4.2
Section 8.5
Section 3.2
RECOMMENDATION
Record Sheet
Purpose
purpose of this Self Verification is to ensure that Work
at the Tangguh Greenfield Site is executed in line with the
ntractor Control of Work for Greenfield and associated
nt documentation under the CSTS Management System
Comments / Remarks
COMMENDATION
RESPONSIBLE PERSON
Rev.2
Updated 02 May 2021
Compliance
YES / NO / NA
TARGET DATE
TEP Self Verification Record Sheet Rev.0
Date: Purpose
Location:
Task / Activity : The purpose of this Self Verification is to ensure that Work
Permit Number : Activity at the Tangguh Greenfield Site is executed in line with
the Lifting Procedure/TEP-930-PRC-HS-BP4-0032 Procedure
Name of Verifiers : and associated relevant documentation under the CSTS
Persons Interviewed or Supervisor: Management System
Sub-Contractor:
Doc. Compliance
Safe Mechanical Lifting Comments / Remarks
Reference YES / NO / NA
1 Has a risk assessment been completed? Apakah penilaian risiko telah selesai?
Are all controls implemented where required? Apakah semua kontrol diimplementasikan
3
jika diperlukan?
Do all workers fully understand the lifting operation and control measures
4 applicable for the lift? Apakah semua pekerja sepenuhnya memahami operasi
pengangkatan dan tindakan pengendalian yang berlaku untuk lift?
Are all personnel involved in the lifting operations competent and trained Apakah semua
5
personel yang terlibat dalam operasi pengangkatan kompeten dan terlatih?
Has SIMOPs been considered before beginning this type of operation? Apakah SIMOP
6
telah dipertimbangkan sebelum memulai jenis operasi ini?
Has a pre-use inspection of the lifting equipment and load been carried out? Apakah
7
pemeriksaan pra-penggunaan peralatan pengangkat dan beban telah dilakukan?
Are the lifting accessories tagged or marked/color coded (to provide a visual
8 indicator of certification status)? Apakah aksesori pengangkat diberi tag atau diberi
tanda/kode warna (untuk memberikan indikator visual status sertifikasi)?
9 Is the lifting equipment free from defects? Apakah alat pengangkat bebas dari cacat?
10 Is the safe working load marked? Apakah beban kerja aman ditandai?
Is the lift area controlled and is everyone clear of the load? Apakah area lift terkontrol dan
12
semua orang bebas dari beban?
Are signalling methods and communication agreed and clear between the
13 banksman and crane operator? Apakah metode pensinyalan dan komunikasi disepakati
dan jelas antara petugas bank dan operator derek?
Do frontline employees only operate equipment that they are qualified to use? Apakah
14 karyawan garis depan hanya mengoperasikan peralatan?bahwa mereka memenuhi
syarat untuk digunakan?
Have exclusion zones been established and obeyed? Apakah zona eksklusi telah
15
ditetapkan dan dipatuhi?
Are frontline employees aware of the hazards and never walk under a
16 suspended load? Apakah karyawan garis depan sadar akan bahaya dan tidak pernah
berjalan di bawah beban yang ditangguhkan?
Is change management (MOC) used to manage any scope or permit changes? Apakah
17 manajemen perubahan (MOC) digunakan untuk mengelola?ruang lingkup atau izin
perubahan?
Do employees understand that they have the authority and expectation to stop
unsafe work? Can they give an example of when this happened? Apakah pemeriksaan
19
Pengawasan SV atau BP Kontraktor telah selesai untuk memastikan bahwa pekerjaan
telahdilakukan sesuai proses?
Did the risk assessment or pre-job discussion include any lessons from past
20 incidents from similar work? Apakah penilaian risiko atau diskusi pra-pekerjaan
memasukkan pelajaran dari masa lalu?insiden dari pekerjaan serupa?
Is there STARRT card for the activity, properly filled and communicated to the crew?
21 Apakah ada kartu STARRT untuk aktivitas, dengan benardiisi dan dikomunikasikan
kepada kru?
RECOMMENDATION
NO ACTION RESPONSIBLE PERSON TARGET DATE
1
2
3
4
5
TEP Self Verification Record Sheet Rev.0
Date: Purpose
Location:
Task / Activity :
The purpose of this Self Verification is to ensure that Work
Permit Number : Activity at the Tangguh Greenfield Site is executed in line with
Name of Verifiers : the Greenfield Construction Control of Work/TEP-930-PRC-
HS-BP4-0002 Procedure and associated relevant
Persons Interviewed or documentation under the CSTS Management System
Supervisor:
Sub-Contractor:
Doc. Compliance
Line of Fire Reference Comments / Remarks
YES / NO / NA
Are risk areas clearly defined and barriers and signs in use to warn personnel of
2 dangers? Apakah area risiko didefinisikan dengan jelas dan hambatan dantanda-
tanda yang digunakan untuk memperingatkan personel tentang bahaya?
Do I see evidence of the use of drops protection equipment, e.g. tool lanyards,
4 tool bags etc.? Apakah saya melihat bukti penggunaan perlindungan tetes?
peralatan, mis. alat lanyard, tas alat dll?
Do I see evidence of work being planned to avoid the risk of dropped objects
6 occurring? Apakah saya melihat bukti pekerjaan yang direncanakan untuk
dihindari?risiko benda jatuh terjadi?
Do I see evidence of work planned to avoid the risk of accidental contact with
overhead power lines?Apakah saya melihat bukti pekerjaan yang direncanakan
7
untuk menghindaririsiko kontak yang tidak disengaja dengan saluran listrik di
atas kepala?
Are plant & equipment operators observant of overhead risks that could
negatively impact on safety? Apakah operator pabrik & peralatan
8
memperhatikanrisiko overhead yang dapat berdampak negatif pada
keselamatan?
Are plant & equipment operators observant of overhead risks that could
9 negatively impact on safety? Apakah operator pabrik & peralatan memperhatikan
risiko overhead yang dapat berdampak negatif pada keselamatan?
Are personnel observant of vehicle movements & ensure that they remain visible
to drivers & equipment operators? Apakah personel memperhatikan pergerakan
11
kendaraan?& memastikan bahwa mereka tetap terlihat oleh pengemudi &
operator peralatan?
Is there STARRT card for the activity, properly filled and communicated to the
13 crew? Apakah ada kartu STARRT untuk aktivitas, dengan benardiisi dan
dikomunikasikan kepada kru?
RECOMMENDATION
4
5
TEP Self Verification Record Sheet Rev.0
Date: Purpose
Location:
Task / Activity : The purpose of this Self Verification is to ensure that Work
Permit Number : Activity at the Tangguh Greenfield Site is executed in line with
the Hot Work/TEP-930-PRC-HS-BP4-0026 Procedure and
Name of Verifiers : associated relevant documentation under the CSTS
Persons Interviewed or Supervisor: Management System
Sub-Contractor:
Doc. Compliance
Hot Work Comments / Remarks
Reference YES / NO / NA
Does the risk assessment address all risks and controls relevant to the activity?
1 Apakah penilaian risiko menangani semua risiko danpengendalian yang relevan dengan
aktivitas?
If the PTW requires a gas test or gas monitoring, has this been completed/ in place and
recorded?
2
.Jika PTW memerlukan uji gas atau pemantauan gas, apakah ini sudah selesai/
dalamtempat dan dicatat?
Has a Fire Watch been appointed and do they know their duties?
3
Apakah Fire Watch telah ditunjuk dan apakah mereka tahutugas mereka?
Where required, are workers properly using controls for metal fumes? I.e. masks,
forced ventilation, etc.
7
Jika diperlukan, apakah pekerja menggunakan kontrol asap logam dengan benar? Yaitu.
topeng,ventilasi paksa, dll.
Are the correct fire extinguishers available in close proximity to the hot work activity?
10
Apakah alat pemadam kebakaran yang benar tersedia di dekat tempat kerja panas?
Have the welding cables, fuel gas lines and electrical cables been run to avoid damage
and slips, trips and falls?
11
Apakah kabel las, saluran bahan bakar gas dan kabel listrik telah dijalankan untuk
menghindarikerusakan dan terpeleset, tersandung dan jatuh?
If Hot Work is being performed at height, has protection been provided to prevent
dropped objects, sparks and hot metal?
16
Jika Pekerjaan Panas dilakukan di ketinggian, apakah perlindungan telah diberikan untuk
mencegah benda jatuh, percikan api, dan logam panas?
If there is a requirement for tool lanyards and barriers, are these in use?
17
Jika ada persyaratan untuk lanyard dan penghalang alat, apakah ini digunakan?
Has gas testing been completed prior to starting hot work in a hazardous area?
19 Apakah pengujian gas telah diselesaikan sebelum memulai pekerjaan panas di area
berbahaya?
Do employees understand that they have the authority and expectation to stop unsafe
work? Can they give an example of when this happened?
21 Apakah karyawan memahami bahwa mereka memiliki wewenang dan harapan untuk
menghentikan pekerjaan yang tidak aman? Bisakah mereka memberi contoh kapan ini
terjadi?
Did the risk assessment or pre-job discussion include any lessons from past incidents
from similar work?
22
Apakah penilaian risiko atau diskusi pra-pekerjaan mencakup pelajaran dari insiden masa
lalu dari pekerjaan serupa?
Is there STARRT card for the activity, properly filled and communicated to the crew?
23 Apakah ada kartu STARRT untuk kegiatan tersebut, diisi dengan benar dan
dikomunikasikan kepada kru?
RECOMMENDATION
NO ACTION RESPONSIBLE PERSON TARGET DATE
1
2
3
4
5
TEP Self Verification Record Sheet Rev.0
Date: Purpose
Location:
Task / Activity : The purpose of this Self Verification is to ensure that Work
Permit Number : Activity at the Tangguh Greenfield Site is executed in line with
the Energy Isolation/TEP-930-PRC-HS-BP4-0021 Procedure
Name of Verifiers : and associated relevant documentation under the CSTS
Persons Interviewed or Supervisor: Management System
Sub-Contractor:
Doc. Compliance
Energy Isolation Comments / Remarks
Reference YES / NO / NA
Does the RP(s) have the required training and competency to perform the task?
4 Apakah RP memiliki pelatihan dan kompetensi yang diperlukan untuk melakukan tugas
tersebut?
Are isolation points labelled to show: Permit Number, Device Number, Lock Number and
Isolation Position?
6
Apakah titik isolasi diberi label untuk menunjukkan: Nomor Izin, Nomor Perangkat, Nomor
Kunci, dan Posisi Isolasi?
Have applied isolations been effectively secured (e.g., locks, chains, wire locks)?
7 Apakah isolasi yang diterapkan telah diamankan secara efektif(misalnya, kunci, rantai,
kunci kawat)?
Did the responsible party sign the Permit for application or removal of each isolation
control?
8
Apakah penanggung jawab menandatangani Izin untuk penerapan atau penghapusan
setiap kontrol isolasi?
Was a test carried out to ensure the isolation is effective (in confirming a zero energy
state)?
9
Apakah tes dilakukan untuk memastikan isolasi efektif (dalam mengkonfirmasi keadaan
energi nol)?
Is there a process to communicate this work to the next shift where applicable?
10
Apakah ada proses untuk mengomunikasikan pekerjaan ini ke shift berikutnya jika ada?
Have SIMOPS issues have been considered and addressed in the risk assessment?
11
Apakah masalah SIMOPS telah dipertimbangkan dan ditangani dalam penilaian risiko?
Have lessons learnt from similar tasks been incoporated into this activity?
14
Apakah pelajaran yang dipetik dari tugas serupa telah dimasukkan ke dalam kegiatan ini?
Do employees understand that they have the authority and expectation to stop unsafe
work? Can they give an example of when this happened?
15 Apakah karyawan memahami bahwa mereka memiliki wewenang dan harapan untuk
menghentikan pekerjaan yang tidak aman? Bisakah mereka memberi contoh kapan ini
terjadi?
Is there STARRT card for the activity, properly filled and communicated to the crew?
17 Apakah ada kartu STARRT untuk kegiatan tersebut, diisi dengan benar dan
dikomunikasikan kepada kru?
Date: Purpose
Location:
Task / Activity : The purpose of this Self Verification is to ensure that Work
Permit Number : Activity at the Tangguh Greenfield Site is executed in line with
the Transportation Safety/TEP-930-PRS-HS-BP4-0003
Name of Verifiers : Procedure and associated relevant documentation under the
Persons Interviewed or Supervisor: CSTS Management System
Sub-Contractor:
Doc. Compliance
driving Safety Comments / Remarks
Reference YES / NO / NA
Observe vehicle operations. Are personnel using seat belts provided correctly?
1 Perhatikan pengoperasian kendaraan. Apakah personel yang menggunakan sabuk
pengaman disediakan dengan benar?
Look for instances of personnel intervening when seat belts are not used correctly.
2 Cari contoh personel yang melakukan intervensi ketika sabuk pengaman tidak digunakan
dengan benar.
Do I see evidence of practices used to bypass the correct use of the seat belt? E.g. seat
belt is permanently fastened but not worn, allowing user to sit on top without being
secured.
3
Apakah saya melihat bukti praktik yang digunakan untuk mengabaikan penggunaan
sabuk pengaman yang benar? Misalnya. sabuk pengaman diikat secara permanen tetapi
tidak dipakai, memungkinkan pengguna untuk duduk di atas tanpa diamankan.
Does the driver remind the passengers to fasten their seat belts prior to departing?
4 Apakah pengemudi mengingatkan penumpang untuk memasang sabuk pengaman
sebelum berangkat?
Are speed limits displayed in the work location & observed by drivers?
6
Apakah batas kecepatan ditampilkan di lokasi kerja & diperhatikan oleh pengemudi?
Do I find evidence of random screening/testing facilities? Are they equipped with the
correct equipment to perform the task?
11
Apakah saya menemukan bukti fasilitas penyaringan/pengujian acak? Apakah mereka
dilengkapi dengan peralatan yang benar untuk melakukan tugas?
Ask personnel to describe the potential negative consequences that may occur as a result
of failing to use a seat belt while travelling inside a moving vehicle.
12 Minta personel untuk menjelaskan potensi konsekuensi negatif yang mungkin terjadi
akibat kegagalan menggunakan sabuk pengaman saat bepergian di dalam kendaraan
yang bergerak.
RECOMMENDATION
NO ACTION RESPONSIBLE PERSON TARGET DATE
1
2
3
4
5