PSP2020FAQ
PSP2020FAQ
PSP2020FAQ
The International Baccalaureate Organization (known as the IB) offers four high-quality
and challenging educational programmes for a worldwide community of schools, aiming
to create a better, more peaceful world. This publication is one of a range of materials
produced to support these programmes.
The IB may use a variety of sources in its work and checks information to verify accuracy
and authenticity, particularly when using community-based knowledge sources such as
Wikipedia. The IB respects the principles of intellectual property and makes strenuous
efforts to identify and obtain permission before publication from rights holders of all
copyright material used. The IB is grateful for permissions received for material used
in this publication and will be pleased to correct any errors or omissions at the earliest
opportunity.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the IB’s prior written
permission, or as expressly permitted by the Rules for use of IB Intellectual Property.
To this end the organization works with schools, governments and international organizations to develop
challenging programmes of international education and rigorous assessment.
These programmes encourage students across the world to become active, compassionate and lifelong
learners who understand that other people, with their differences, can also be right.
IB learner profile
profile IB learner
arner profile IB le
ile IB learner prof
IB learner profile H E IB L E AR
N
ER
er profile IB learn
PROFILE
IB learner profile
The aim of all IB programmes is to develop internationally minded people who, recognizing their common
humanity and shared guardianship of the planet, help to create a better and more peaceful world.
As IB learners we strive to be:
We nurture our curiosity, developing skills for inquiry and We critically appreciate our own cultures and personal histories,
research. We know how to learn independently and with others. as well as the values and traditions of others. We seek and evaluate
We learn with enthusiasm and sustain our love of learning a range of points of view, and we are willing to grow from the
throughout life. experience.
We develop and use conceptual understanding, exploring We show empathy, compassion and respect. We have a
knowledge across a range of disciplines. We engage with issues commitment to service, and we act to make a positive difference
and ideas that have local and global significance. in the lives of others and in the world around us.
We use critical and creative thinking skills to analyse and take We approach uncertainty with forethought and determination;
responsible action on complex problems. We exercise initiative in we work independently and cooperatively to explore new ideas
making reasoned, ethical decisions. and innovative strategies. We are resourceful and resilient in the
face of challenges and change.
We express ourselves confidently and creatively in more than one
language and in many ways. We collaborate effectively, listening We understand the importance of balancing different aspects of
carefully to the perspectives of other individuals and groups. our lives—intellectual, physical, and emotional—to achieve
well-being for ourselves and others. We recognize our interde-
pendence with other people and with the world in which we live.
We act with integrity and honesty, with a strong sense of
fairness and justice, and with respect for the dignity and rights We thoughtfully consider the world and our own ideas and expe-
of people everywhere. We take responsibility for our actions rience. We work to understand our strengths and weaknesses in
and their consequences. order to support our learning and personal development.
The IB learner profile represents 10 attributes valued by IB World Schools. We believe these attributes, and others
like them, can help individuals and groups become responsible members of local, national and global communities.
Preliminary review
What is the preliminary review?
The preliminary review is one step in the redeveloped programme evaluation process. It is an opportunity
for the school and the IB to ensure that all required school and programme documentation is in place prior
to the evaluation visit or reading. The preliminary review submission date is at least four months prior to the
evaluation visit or reading.
The school may wish to begin their self-study while completing the preliminary review. The school’s IBWS
manager is available to answer questions and offer support for completing the preliminary review and self-
study.
Does the preliminary review have to be completed before schools begin the
self-study?
No, schools do not have to complete the preliminary review before starting the self-study and completing
the self-study questionnaire.
The school must have in place written procedures for how it will deal with complaints and student requests
for appeals against IB programme-related decisions taken by the school, ensure that details of these
procedures are made widely available and accessible to all students, and operate in accordance with such
procedures. The school must inform parents or legal guardians about the school’s procedures for
addressing complaints and students’ requests for appeals of IB programme decisions taken by the school.
There is no expectation that the procedure is specific for the IB programme(s). Most schools will already
have developed and communicated expectations and identified steps for students and parents who have a
complaint or want to appeal a school decision. The procedure is part of the documentation required for the
preliminary review.
Is there a required format for DP unit plans and the TOK course outlines
templates?
Schools may use the DP unit planner templates available on the Approaches to teaching and learning
website in the DP section of the programme resource centre. Schools may also develop their own
templates following the guidance in Diploma Programme: From principles into practice, specifically in the
section called “Developing a quality Diploma Programme curriculum”. As a further resource, please refer to
“Appendix 1: Documentation for preliminary review” in the Guide to programme evaluation (for use from
September 2020) which indicates which requirements the unit planners must evidence.
Schools will have access to the Guide to programme evaluation (for use from September 2020) and the
new self-study questionnaire in April 2020. The internal processes and timelines for organizing the self-
study, preparing for the preliminary review and completing the questionnaire are left to the school.
What is the timeline for the self-study and the evaluation visit?
With the 2020 programme standards and practices, the IB is moving to a school readiness approach.
Schools may take up to twelve months to complete the self-study and submit the self-study questionnaire.
Schools choose the date during the year of evaluation when they will submit the self-study questionnaire.
The evaluation visit is six weeks after the date of the self-study questionnaire submission.
How does the 2020 self-study questionnaire differ from the current version?
The new self-study questionnaire consists of two parts: a school’s self-assessment and documentation of
programme development. The new self-assessment is similar to the process in the current questionnaire.
Schools self-assess the fidelity of the implementation of their IB programme(s) as expressed in the IB
Programme standards and practices. The second part of the self-study questionnaire is new. Schools are
asked to share an example of programme development showing how they have developed, analysed and
reflected on an aspect of the programme(s). This reflects a new emphasis on supporting programme
development in schools. Schools with multiple programmes may submit plans for one or more programmes
as appropriate for their context but are encouraged to create plans that support continuity and coherence
across the programmes.
As schools prepare documents for the preliminary review, they may add an action to indicate documents
that need to be updated. During the self-assessment, schools may add actions to indicate requirements
that are not in place and need to be addressed before the evaluation visit. If there are requirements that
are not in place and will not be in place during the visit (due to budgetary or scheduling constraints, for
example), the school can use the action plan to document plans to address those requirements.
During the preliminary review, the IB may add matters to the action plan that the school must address. The
school is given the opportunity to address these prior to the visit. Matters identified during the preliminary
review will be communicated in the preliminary review report and must be resolved or there must be a plan
in place to address them, no later than six weeks prior to the visit.
During the evaluation visit or DP reading, the IB may identify requirements that are not in place. These will
be communicated in the evaluation report and matters to be addressed, evidence required, and deadlines
will be added to the action plan.
Are schools required to add recommendations from the last evaluation to the
action plan?
No. While the programmes have not changed, the organization of the programme standards and practices
has and there is not a straightforward correspondence between the 2014 and 2020 Programme standards
and practices. Schools and evaluation teams are encouraged to use the previous recommendations to
inform their work.
Self-assessment
How should schools answer the “describe any major achievements” and the
“major challenges” prompts? Where do they put evidence to support the
narratives?
Schools are asked to share achievements or challenges that have for them been big, impactful, or
significant in their work for the standard. The intent is to give context for the evaluation team to understand
How many programme development plans will schools share with the IB?
During programme evaluation, generally schools will share and the IB will give feedback on one programme
development plan. Schools will likely complete several programme development plans during the five-year
review period but will generally select one plan to share with the IB.
Schools with multiple IB programmes may submit plans for one or more programmes as appropriate for
their context but are encouraged to use the opportunity to develop continuity and connections across
programmes. If a programme-specific plan is submitted, the reflection part of the narrative could discuss
how the strategy can be transferred and applied to other programmes.
What is a motif?
The term motif is no longer in use. The term was introduced as a way of referring to a group of practices
from across different categories of the framework that supported focused programme development. The IB
has decided there is not a need to introduce new terminology.
How many areas for programme development should a school focus on and
for how long?
This is left to the school to decide and depends on school context. The experience of the school and school
staff, resources, and demands of other initiatives should be considered. In some cases, just one focus at a
time will be appropriate. Other schools may have the staff and resources to sustain work in three to five
areas of focus at a time. Timelines for the plans are left to the school. New programme development plans
are created when the school determines that priorities or strategic goals shift.
For the exit meeting, does the school decide who is present or is it the
visiting team?
The school decides who is present at all meetings during the visit.
In the school community meeting, held at the end of the evaluation visit, the school leadership team (or
others designated by the leadership) and the IB evaluation team will report to the school community. This
includes the conclusions that the school has reached from the self-study as well as the preliminary findings
of the team. The school will determine who reports for the school and who is present for the report (for
example, the school teams involved in each aspect of the self-study might report to the larger school
community, including teachers, students, parents and governing board).
System
What system or platform will support programme evaluation?
IB Concierge will launch in March 2020 as the system to support programme evaluation. It replaces IB Docs
as a platform for PYP, MYP and DP evaluations. CP, multi-programme and continuum evaluations will
continue to be delivered via SharePoint using Word templates. The Operations department plans to seek
approval for a new system, but there is no timeline for that development.
Other questions
What support is available to schools during the programme evaluation
process?
Support is available from IB Answers for any aspects of the evaluation process. They are the first point of
contact and can direct the school to team members for assistance with specific queries.
The IBWS manager assigned to each school is the point of contact for programme implementation
questions and general support for the self-study process. After the evaluation process is complete, the
IBWS manager can support the school in revising or updating their programme development plan, or
creating a new plan informed by the outcome of the evaluation.
• July 2020. A category 2 workshop Leading the learning will support implementation of the 2020
programme standards and practices.
• July 2021. A category 3 workshop Preparing for programme evaluation will support schools in the
programme evaluation process.
• July 2022. A category 3 workshop Action Research will support programme development planning.
Will PYP evaluations be aligned with the five-year cycle of the other
programmes (instead of four years for first evaluation, then five years for
subsequent evaluations)?
PYP evaluations will now occur every five years in alignment with the other programmes.