17 - Science 305.621
17 - Science 305.621
17 - Science 305.621
If you wish to distribute this article to others, you can order high-quality copies for your
colleagues, clients, or customers by clicking here.
Permission to republish or repurpose articles or portions of articles can be obtained by
following the guidelines here.
Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in December, by the
American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. Copyright
2004 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title Science is a
registered trademark of AAAS.
PERSPECTIVES
abiotic or biotic factors alone is likely to References 7. J. H. Connell, in Dynamics of Populations, P. J. den
provide only limited answers. In addition to 1. D. H. Janzen, Biotropica 6, 69 (1974). Boer, G. R. Gradwell, Eds. (Centre for Agricultural
2. P. V. A. Fine, I. Mesones, P. D. Coley, Science 305, 663 Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, Neth-
soils, the impact of herbivores on tropical (2004). erlands, 1971), pp. 298–312.
forests may vary with elevation and along 3. R. J. Marquis, in Biotic Interactions in the Tropics, D. 8. L. A. Hyatt et al., Oikos 103, 590 (2003).
gradients or discontinuities in soil flooding Burslem, M. Pinard, S. Hartley, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. 9. K. E. Harms et al., Nature 404, 493 (2000).
(10), light (11), and fire (12). But for now, Press, Cambridge, in press). 10. R. T. King, Biotropica 35, 462 (2003).
4. S. M. Louda, Ecol. Monogr. 52, 25 (1982). 11. S. J. DeWalt et al., Ecology 85, 471 (2004).
the Fine et al. work adds to the mounting
5. A. R. E. Sinclair, P. Arecese, Eds., Serengeti II, 12. H. T. Dublin, in Serengeti II, Dynamics, Management,
evidence that herbivory is a major factor Dynamics, Management, and Conservation of an and Conservation of an Ecosystem, A. R. E. Sinclair,
determining the plant composition of trop- Ecosystem (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1995). P. Arecese, Eds. (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago,
ical forests. 6. D. H. Janzen, Am. Nat. 104, 501 (1970). 1995), pp. 71–90.
GEOLOGY
ing Sokolov, Termier and Termier, and
Cloud and Glaessner (2)—have proposed
A New Period for formal definitions of this interval. Now, in
accordance with international rules, the
the Geologic Time Scale new period has been defined by an event
recorded in a single section of rock out-
cropping termed the global stratotype sec-
Andrew H. Knoll, Malcolm R. Walter, Guy M. Narbonne, Nicholas Christie-Blick tion and point (GSSP). (The GSSP is the
reference section that defines the “stan-
T jor achievement of 19th-century sci- this year with the approval by IUGS of an period worldwide.) The initial GSSP of the
ence, a coherent record of our planet’s addition to the geologic time scale: the Ediacaran Period lies at the base of a textu-
history fashioned from myriad details of in- Ediacaran Period (2). This newly ratified rally and chemically distinctive carbonate
dividual rock outcroppings. The eras, peri- period, which directly precedes the layer that overlies glaciogenic rocks in an
ods, and finer divisions of the scale not only Cambrian, is the first Precambrian interval exposure along Enorama Creek in the
codify geologic time, they reflect our accu- to be defined according to the principles Flinders Ranges, South Australia (2) (see
mulated understanding of Earth’s past—or at that govern the Phanerozoic time scale. It is the figure). The period’s end coincides with
least its more recent past. The Cambrian also the first stratigraphically defined new the beginning of the Cambrian Period,
Period, with its fossil record of animal diver- period of any sort to be added since 1891 which is defined by its own initial GSSP re-
sification, began only 543 million years ago when Williams divided the Carboniferous siding in Newfoundland, Canada.
(Ma), when Earth was already 4000 million Period in two (Mississippian and Penn- Formalisms aside, international ratifica-
years old (see the figure). In the 19th centu- sylvanian). The distinctive character of the tion of the new period reflects our expand-
ry and for much of the 20th century, the be- Ediacaran interval has been recognized for ing knowledge of Earth’s deep physical and
ginning of the Cambrian (also the beginning decades, and numerous geologists—includ- biological history. The Ediacaran Period, in
of the Paleozoic era and the Phanerozoic fact, constitutes a dis-
Phanerozoic
ignation, the International Union of Geo- Ediacara biota name. The unique mor-
logical Sciences (IUGS) approved a division 580 Gaskiers glaciation phologies of the Edia-
of Precambrian time into eons, eras, and pe- cara biota have spawned
590
riods defined strictly by chronometric age, widely varying system-
without reference to events recorded in sedi- 600 Oldest animal embryos atic interpretations—
mentary rocks (1). The eras stuck, but the from giant protists and
proposed period names are seldom used. 610 lichens to seaweeds
and extinct experi-
620 Cap carbonate
ments in multicellulari-
“Cryogenian”
P L A N E TA R Y S C I E N C E
On the basis of the wide ranges in com-
position, mineralogy, texture, and cosmic-
A Unique Chunk of the Moon ray exposure ages, the 30 lunar meteorites
likely represent at least 20 impacts on the
Randy L. Korotev lunar surface, although the crater of origin
is not known for any of them. For any giv-
n 1982 a team of U.S. scientists collecting although three others not yet classified had en lunar meteorite, the fact that we don’t