Chapter 4

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF


DATA

This chapter, presents the result, the analysis and the interpretation of the data gathered

from the answers to the questionnaires distributed to the field. The said data were presented in

tabular form in accordance with the specific posited on the statement of the problem.

Table 1.1-1.7 Shows the Socio Demographic Profile of the Working Students of St. Rose

College Educational Foundation Inc.

Table 1.1 Socio-demographic profiles of SRCEIF Working Students

Age TOTAL PERCENTAGE


16 - 18 years old 3 7.50%
19 - 21 years old 18 45.00%

22 - 24 years old 17 42.50%

25 - above 2 5.00%

The table provided shows the distribution of students based on different age ranges. For

the age category between 16 and 18 years old, there are 3 students, accounting for approximately

7.50% of the total. The age category between 19 and 21 years old has the highest representation,

with 18 students, making up about 45.00% of the total. The age ranges from 22 to 24 years old

includes 17 students, representing approximately 42.50% of the total. Lastly, there are 2 students

who are 25 years old or above, constituting around 5.00% of the total.

1
Table 1.2. Socio-demographic profile of SRCEIF Working Students
Sex TOTAL PERCENTAGE

Male 23 57.50%

Female 17 42.50%

The table provided presents the distribution of students based on gender, the table shows

that there are more males than females in the surveyed population, with males making up the

majority at 57.50%. Females, on the other hand, comprise 42.50% of the total.

Table 1.3 Socio-demographic profiles of SRCEIF Working Students

Marital Status TOTAL PERCENTAGE

Single 40 100%

Married 0 0

Widow 0 0

Common Law 0 0

The table provided presents the distribution of students based on Marital Status. The table

shows that there are 40 students who are single, with none of them being married, widowed, or in

a common-law relationship.

2
Table 1.4 Socio-demographic profiles of SRCEIF Working Students

Family Monthly Income TOTAL PERCENTAGE


Below - 6000 10 25%
6001- 7000 9 22.50%

7001 - 9000 5 12.50%

9001 - 10000 5 12.50%

10001 - above 11 27.50%

The table provided presents the distribution of students based on Monthly Income of the

Family. The table shows that there are 10 students who earn below – 6000, comprising 25% in

total. 9 students have a Family Income 6001-7000 accounting for approximately 22.50 % in total.

There are 12.50% or 5 students who respond in both 7001 - 9000 and 9001 - 10000, and lastly

10001 and above has the highest representation, with 11 students, making up about 45.00% of the

total.

Table 1.5 Socio-demographic profiles of SRCEIF Working Students

Academic Status TOTAL PERCENTAGE

Regular 34 85%

Irregular 6 15%

The table provided presents the distribution of students based on the academic status; the

table shows that there are 34 students, accounting for approximately 85 % in total, while the

irregular students include 6 students making up the majority at 15% of total.

3
Table 1.6 Socio-demographic profiles of SRCEIF Working Students

Year Level TOTAL PERCENTAGE

First Year 13 32.50%

Second Year 13 32.50%

Third Year 5 12.50%

Fourth Year 9 22.50%

The table provided presents the distribution on Year Level, the table shows that for First

Year and Second Year students there are 13 students, accounting for approximately 32.50% in

total. The Third Year students includes 5 students making up about 12.50% in total, lastly there

are 9 Fourth Year students, constituting around 22.50%

Table 1.7 Socio-demographic profiles of SRCEIF Working Students

TYPES OF WORK TOTAL PERCENTAGE

Service Crew 10 25%

Call center 2 5%

Mechanic 1 3%

Pump Attendant 2 5%

Construction Worker 3 8%

Vendor 4 10%

Online Seller 5 13%

4
Saleslady 2 5%

Delivery Crew 2 5%

Farm Tech. 5 13%

Networking 2 5%

Cashier 1 3%

The table provided presents the distribution of types of work for the students. The table

shows that service crew there are 10 students, accounting for approximately 25% in total. While

call center, pump attendant, saleslady, delivery crew and networking with 2 students making up

about 5% of total. Construction workers include 3 students’ constituting around 8% in total. On

the other hand, vendors with 4 students accounting for approximately 10% in total. Additionally,

online sellers with farm tech include 5 students comprise 13% of the total. Lastly, Mechanic and

cashier there are 1 student making up about 3% of total.

Table 2: The Academic Challenges of Working Students

Financial Aspect Weighted Mean Adjectival Rating


I don’t have enough
2.575 AGREE
allowance.
I have difficulties in
budgeting my monthly 2.6 AGREE
income
I starve during class hours
because I don’t have a budget 3.45 NEUTRAL
for snacks.
I am not financially supported 3.275
by my parents and relatives. NEUTRAL
I don’t have a budget for
projects and school fees. 3.125 NEUTRAL
Average Mean 3.005 NEUTRAL

5
Social Aspect

I can’t cooperate during


activities because I’m tired of 3.675 NEUTRAL
my work already.
I have no interest to chat with 3.6
my classmates NEUTRAL
I am not confident because of
severe discrimination. 4 DISAGREE
I can’t fit with the trends,
standards, and likes of my 3.525 NEUTRAL
peers.
I am bullied in
different forms. 4.4 DISAGREE
Average Mean 3.84 NEUTRAL

Psychological Aspect

I am exhausted due to my
studies and work. 2.825 NEUTRAL
I don't have enough time to
rest and sleep at night. 2.925 NEUTRAL
School tasks and work lower
my energy. 2.85 NEUTRAL
I have not enough time to
study my lesson. 3.05 NEUTRAL
I encounter difficulty setting
priorities. 2.75 AGREE
Average Mean 2.88 NEUTRAL

6
Teacher’s Factor Aspect

Teachers are strict and


don’t give consideration. 3.725 DISAGREE
Teachers' discussion in an 3.6
unclear manner. NEUTRAL
I hate my teacher and that
affects my interests in the 3.725 DISAGREE
subjects.
I cannot understand my
teacher’s way of discussing. 3.6 NEUTRAL
Teachers employ difficult
activities that are hard for us 3.75 DISAGREE
to accomplish.
Average Mean 3.68 DISAGREE

Classroom Environment
Aspect
Classrooms are not conducive
3.8 DISAGREE
for learning.
It's uncomfortable inside the 3.625
classroom. NEUTRAL
Too many bystanders
outside cause distraction. 3.35 NEUTRAL
It’s hot inside the classroom 2.325
during class hours. AGREE
Having unpleasant
surroundings. 2.95 NEUTRAL
Average Mean 3.063 NEUTRAL

7
Student Experience Weighted Mean Adjectival Rating
I have a hectic schedule. 1.98 SOMETIMES

I have enough salary to


support my needs. 2.59 SOMETIMES

It is hard to become a working


student. 1.62 NEVER

I feel embarrassed when my


classmates see me working. 3.7 USUALLY

I enjoy my work while


studying. 1.27 SOMETIMES

Average Mean 2.232 SOMETIMES

Factors affecting working


students

I think of my salary more than


2.08 SOMETIMES
my study

I am organized 1.9 SOMETIMES

My actual knowledge is more


than my theoretical knowledge 2.38 SOMETIMES

I have time management 1.51 NEVER

I have leadership skills 2.28 SOMETIMES


Average Mean 2.03 SOMETIMES

8
Effects of working while
studying

I get enough sleep. 2.59 SOMETIMES

I feel exhausted during class


hours. 2.8 OFTEN

I do get lower grades. 2.34 SOMETIMES

I am late or absent due to


work. 2.69 SOMETIMES

I can still focus on my class. 1.85 NEVER

Average Mean 2.454 SOMETIMES

It shows that the gathered results mostly are neutral in terms of financial aspect with the

average mean of 3.005, social aspect with 3.84, psychological aspect with 2.88, and classroom

factor with 3.063. However, teachers have a 3.68 average mean which means they disagree.

Moreover, the three remaining academic challenges are a result of SOMETIMES in terms

of student experience, factors affecting working students, and effects of working while studying

which means that out of 40 respondents can balance the work and study.

9
Table 3. Significant Relationship between the Socio-demographic Profile and

Academic Challenges of Working Students.

Variable Tested Computed r p-value Conclusion


Statistically Not
Financial Aspect 0.780 0.0895
Significant

Statistically Not
Social 0.065 0.4310
Significant

Statistically Not
Psychological 0.523 0.0914
Significant

Statistically Not
Teacher Factor 0.792 0.2602
Significant

Statistically Not
Classroom
0.850 0.1673
Age Environment Significant

Student
Statistically
experience
-0.418 0.0307
Significant

Factors affecting
Statistically Not
working student
0.529 0.0618
Significant

Effects of
working while Statistically Not
studying -0.245 0.0593
Significant

10
Statistically Not
Financial Aspect -0.352 0.2260
Significant

Statistically Not
Social -0.962 0.4613
Significant

Statistically Not
Psychological -0.416 0.2281
Significant

Statistically Not
Teacher Factor -0.574 0.4279
Significant
Sex
Statistically Not
Classroom -0.418 0.3273
Environment Significant

Student Statistically Not


experience -0.634 0.1307
Significant

Factors affecting Statistically Not


working student -0.979 0.1873
Significant

Effects of
Statistically Not
working while
studying -0.714 0.1850
Significant

Statistically Not
Financial Aspect -0.674 0.0674
Significant

Statistically Not
Social 0.196 0.2731
Marital Status Significant

Statistically Not
Psychological -0.767 0.0693
Significant

11
Statistically Not
Teacher Factor -0.303 0.2243
Significant

Statistically Not
Classroom -0.470 0.1370
Environment Significant

Student Statistically
experience 0.924 0.0182
Significant

Factors affecting Statistically Not


working student 0.319 0.4284
Significant

Effects of Statistically
working while
studying -0.539 0.0404 Significant

Statistically Not
Financial Aspect -1 0.3247
Significant

Statistically Not
Social -1 0.5739
Significant

Statistically Not
Psychological -1 0.3282
Significant

Academic Status Statistically Not


Teacher Factor -1 0.5323
Significant

Statistically Not
Classroom -1 0.4358
Environment Significant

Student Statistically Not


experience 1 0.1849
Significant

12
Factors affecting Statistically Not
working student -1 0.2688
Significant

Effects of Statistically Not


working while
studying -1 0.2624 Significant

Statistically Not
Financial Aspect 0.138 0.0825
Significant

Statistically Not
Social 0.785 0.2954
Significant

Statistically Not
Psychological 0.140 0.0844
Significant

Statistically Not
Teacher Factor 0.382 0.2498
Significant
Year Level
Statistically Not
Classroom 0.236 0.1583
Environment Significant

Student Statistically
experience 0.802 0.0260
Significant

Factors affecting Statistically Not


working student 0.594 0.0555
Significant

Effects of Statistically
working while
studying 0.160 0.0529 Significant

13
Statistically
Financial Aspect -0.2531 0.0002
Significant

Statistically
Social -0.2533 0.0177
Significant

Statistically
Psychological -0.6023 0.0002
Significant

Statistically
Teacher Factor -0.1988 0.0093
Significant
Work
Statistically
Classroom -0.3403 0.0018
Environment Significant

Student Statistically
experience 0.6623 0.0001
Significant

Factors affecting Statistically


working student 0.1519 0.0001
Significant

Effects of
Statistically
working while
studying -0.174 0.0001
Significant

Statistically
Financial Aspect -0.384 0.0409
Significant
Statistically Not
Social 0.275 0.2126
Significant
Monthly Income Statistically
Psychological -0.438 0.0422
Significant
Statistically Not
Teacher Factor 0.022 0.1706
Significant

14
Statistically Not
Classroom
-0.117 0.0946
Environment Significant
Student
Statistically
experience -0.010 0.0093
Significant

Factors affecting Statistically


working student -0.454 0.0245
Significant

Effects of
working while Statistically
studying -0.622 0.0231
Significant

This table shows the results of the relationship between socio-demographic profile and

the academic challenges among working students. It revealed that marital status, and year level

have significant relationship to Student experience, and Effects of working while studying, while

age have only significant relationship to working student. Also, the work has a significant

relationship to all academic challenges among working students then monthly income has a

significant relationship to financial aspect and factors affecting working student and in effects of

working while studying. On the other hand, sex and academic status have no significant

relationship to all academic challenges, furthermore, other challenges have no significant

relationship to age, marital status, year level and monthly income.

15

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy