Chapter 4
Chapter 4
Chapter 4
This chapter, presents the result, the analysis and the interpretation of the data gathered
from the answers to the questionnaires distributed to the field. The said data were presented in
tabular form in accordance with the specific posited on the statement of the problem.
Table 1.1-1.7 Shows the Socio Demographic Profile of the Working Students of St. Rose
25 - above 2 5.00%
The table provided shows the distribution of students based on different age ranges. For
the age category between 16 and 18 years old, there are 3 students, accounting for approximately
7.50% of the total. The age category between 19 and 21 years old has the highest representation,
with 18 students, making up about 45.00% of the total. The age ranges from 22 to 24 years old
includes 17 students, representing approximately 42.50% of the total. Lastly, there are 2 students
who are 25 years old or above, constituting around 5.00% of the total.
1
Table 1.2. Socio-demographic profile of SRCEIF Working Students
Sex TOTAL PERCENTAGE
Male 23 57.50%
Female 17 42.50%
The table provided presents the distribution of students based on gender, the table shows
that there are more males than females in the surveyed population, with males making up the
majority at 57.50%. Females, on the other hand, comprise 42.50% of the total.
Single 40 100%
Married 0 0
Widow 0 0
Common Law 0 0
The table provided presents the distribution of students based on Marital Status. The table
shows that there are 40 students who are single, with none of them being married, widowed, or in
a common-law relationship.
2
Table 1.4 Socio-demographic profiles of SRCEIF Working Students
The table provided presents the distribution of students based on Monthly Income of the
Family. The table shows that there are 10 students who earn below – 6000, comprising 25% in
total. 9 students have a Family Income 6001-7000 accounting for approximately 22.50 % in total.
There are 12.50% or 5 students who respond in both 7001 - 9000 and 9001 - 10000, and lastly
10001 and above has the highest representation, with 11 students, making up about 45.00% of the
total.
Regular 34 85%
Irregular 6 15%
The table provided presents the distribution of students based on the academic status; the
table shows that there are 34 students, accounting for approximately 85 % in total, while the
3
Table 1.6 Socio-demographic profiles of SRCEIF Working Students
The table provided presents the distribution on Year Level, the table shows that for First
Year and Second Year students there are 13 students, accounting for approximately 32.50% in
total. The Third Year students includes 5 students making up about 12.50% in total, lastly there
Call center 2 5%
Mechanic 1 3%
Pump Attendant 2 5%
Construction Worker 3 8%
Vendor 4 10%
4
Saleslady 2 5%
Delivery Crew 2 5%
Networking 2 5%
Cashier 1 3%
The table provided presents the distribution of types of work for the students. The table
shows that service crew there are 10 students, accounting for approximately 25% in total. While
call center, pump attendant, saleslady, delivery crew and networking with 2 students making up
the other hand, vendors with 4 students accounting for approximately 10% in total. Additionally,
online sellers with farm tech include 5 students comprise 13% of the total. Lastly, Mechanic and
5
Social Aspect
Psychological Aspect
I am exhausted due to my
studies and work. 2.825 NEUTRAL
I don't have enough time to
rest and sleep at night. 2.925 NEUTRAL
School tasks and work lower
my energy. 2.85 NEUTRAL
I have not enough time to
study my lesson. 3.05 NEUTRAL
I encounter difficulty setting
priorities. 2.75 AGREE
Average Mean 2.88 NEUTRAL
6
Teacher’s Factor Aspect
Classroom Environment
Aspect
Classrooms are not conducive
3.8 DISAGREE
for learning.
It's uncomfortable inside the 3.625
classroom. NEUTRAL
Too many bystanders
outside cause distraction. 3.35 NEUTRAL
It’s hot inside the classroom 2.325
during class hours. AGREE
Having unpleasant
surroundings. 2.95 NEUTRAL
Average Mean 3.063 NEUTRAL
7
Student Experience Weighted Mean Adjectival Rating
I have a hectic schedule. 1.98 SOMETIMES
8
Effects of working while
studying
It shows that the gathered results mostly are neutral in terms of financial aspect with the
average mean of 3.005, social aspect with 3.84, psychological aspect with 2.88, and classroom
factor with 3.063. However, teachers have a 3.68 average mean which means they disagree.
Moreover, the three remaining academic challenges are a result of SOMETIMES in terms
of student experience, factors affecting working students, and effects of working while studying
which means that out of 40 respondents can balance the work and study.
9
Table 3. Significant Relationship between the Socio-demographic Profile and
Statistically Not
Social 0.065 0.4310
Significant
Statistically Not
Psychological 0.523 0.0914
Significant
Statistically Not
Teacher Factor 0.792 0.2602
Significant
Statistically Not
Classroom
0.850 0.1673
Age Environment Significant
Student
Statistically
experience
-0.418 0.0307
Significant
Factors affecting
Statistically Not
working student
0.529 0.0618
Significant
Effects of
working while Statistically Not
studying -0.245 0.0593
Significant
10
Statistically Not
Financial Aspect -0.352 0.2260
Significant
Statistically Not
Social -0.962 0.4613
Significant
Statistically Not
Psychological -0.416 0.2281
Significant
Statistically Not
Teacher Factor -0.574 0.4279
Significant
Sex
Statistically Not
Classroom -0.418 0.3273
Environment Significant
Effects of
Statistically Not
working while
studying -0.714 0.1850
Significant
Statistically Not
Financial Aspect -0.674 0.0674
Significant
Statistically Not
Social 0.196 0.2731
Marital Status Significant
Statistically Not
Psychological -0.767 0.0693
Significant
11
Statistically Not
Teacher Factor -0.303 0.2243
Significant
Statistically Not
Classroom -0.470 0.1370
Environment Significant
Student Statistically
experience 0.924 0.0182
Significant
Effects of Statistically
working while
studying -0.539 0.0404 Significant
Statistically Not
Financial Aspect -1 0.3247
Significant
Statistically Not
Social -1 0.5739
Significant
Statistically Not
Psychological -1 0.3282
Significant
Statistically Not
Classroom -1 0.4358
Environment Significant
12
Factors affecting Statistically Not
working student -1 0.2688
Significant
Statistically Not
Financial Aspect 0.138 0.0825
Significant
Statistically Not
Social 0.785 0.2954
Significant
Statistically Not
Psychological 0.140 0.0844
Significant
Statistically Not
Teacher Factor 0.382 0.2498
Significant
Year Level
Statistically Not
Classroom 0.236 0.1583
Environment Significant
Student Statistically
experience 0.802 0.0260
Significant
Effects of Statistically
working while
studying 0.160 0.0529 Significant
13
Statistically
Financial Aspect -0.2531 0.0002
Significant
Statistically
Social -0.2533 0.0177
Significant
Statistically
Psychological -0.6023 0.0002
Significant
Statistically
Teacher Factor -0.1988 0.0093
Significant
Work
Statistically
Classroom -0.3403 0.0018
Environment Significant
Student Statistically
experience 0.6623 0.0001
Significant
Effects of
Statistically
working while
studying -0.174 0.0001
Significant
Statistically
Financial Aspect -0.384 0.0409
Significant
Statistically Not
Social 0.275 0.2126
Significant
Monthly Income Statistically
Psychological -0.438 0.0422
Significant
Statistically Not
Teacher Factor 0.022 0.1706
Significant
14
Statistically Not
Classroom
-0.117 0.0946
Environment Significant
Student
Statistically
experience -0.010 0.0093
Significant
Effects of
working while Statistically
studying -0.622 0.0231
Significant
This table shows the results of the relationship between socio-demographic profile and
the academic challenges among working students. It revealed that marital status, and year level
have significant relationship to Student experience, and Effects of working while studying, while
age have only significant relationship to working student. Also, the work has a significant
relationship to all academic challenges among working students then monthly income has a
significant relationship to financial aspect and factors affecting working student and in effects of
working while studying. On the other hand, sex and academic status have no significant
15