STATS
STATS
STATS
(A Quantitative Study)
Blessy Montemayor
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This study would not have been possible without the participation and support of so many
people whose names may not all be enumerated. Their efforts are deeply appreciated and
recognized. However, the group would like to convey their heartfelt gratitude and thanks to the
following individuals:
Ms. Princess Joy Bogambal, for her unending help, kindness, and understanding
To all relatives and friends, who shared their support, either morally, financially, or
Above all, thanks to the Great Almighty, the source of all knowledge and wisdom, for his
unending love.
We thank you.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgment 2
Table of Contents 3
Problem 6
Decision making 9
Conclusion 10
Appendix A 11
Appendix B 14
Computations 14
Statistical Treatment 17
Appendix C 18
Documentation 18
Appendix D 19
Curriculum Vitae 19
independent groups. The independent t-test compares the means of two independent groups to
test whether the means of related populations are significantly different. For example, you could
use an independent t-test to determine whether first-year graduate earnings differed by gender
(ie, your dependent variable would be "first-year graduate earnings" and your independent
𝑠1: Standard Deviation for Group 1 𝑠2: Standard Deviation for Group 2
𝑛1: Number of sample or data for Group 1 𝑛2: Number of sample or data for Group 2
EXAMPLES:
● Do individuals who enroll in the SAT prep course perform better on the test than those
who don't?
PROBLEM
Background of the Problem
Using a mixed-methods research design, this study compares the academic performance
of the STEM male and female students at Our Lady of Fatima University. The factors
contributing to gender differences in academic performance at the two levels of the educational
ladder were also explored. Overall, the results show that the academic performance of males was
better than females at the senior high school level, while at the tertiary level, the academic
performance of females appeared to have improved relative to that of males. The efficacy of this
research is to determine the significant difference by recording and listing the first semester
grades of STEM students, both female and male, studying at Our Lady of Fatima University. To
see if males have higher grades than females or females have higher grades than males, this
research will be conducted by surveying STEM students at Our Lady of Fatima University. The
researcher will be able to distinguish the difference between both genders based on their
Problem
between male and female STEM students. To perform the study, the researchers gathered their
first semester general averages, and the findings are displayed below. This test used a 5% level of
significance.
female 96 95 95 96 92 95 96 97 96 93
male 96 89 90 92 90 92 92 94 95 87
Example 1
Prove the hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the grades of STEM
Mean 1 Mean 2
95.1 91.7
1. 52388392675 2. 83881822047
N₁ N₂
10 10
Hₒ: There is no significant difference in academic performance between male and female
STEM students.
Hₐ: There is a significant difference in academic performance between male and female
STEM students.
Level of significance
𝑎 = 0. 05 𝑜𝑟 5% Two-tailed test
𝑎 = 0. 05 𝑜𝑟 5% Df = 18
𝑛 = 20 CV = ± 2.101
𝐷𝑓 (Degrees of Freedom) = 𝑛₁ + 𝑛₂ - 2
Critical Values of t-Distribution
One-Tailed
Two-Tailed
FEMALE MALE
Male STEM students have a mean of 91.7 and a standard deviation of 2. 83881822047
While female STEM students had a mean of 95.1 and a standard deviation of 1. 52388392675.
Decision Rule
If the calculated t-value is greater than the critical t-value, reject the null hypothesis but if
the calculated t-value is less than the critical t-value, it fails to reject the null hypothesis.
95.1 − 91.7
𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑑 = (10 − 1)(1.52388392675)²+(10 − 1)(2.83881822047)² 1 1
⎡ ⎤⎡ 10 + ⎤
⎣ 10 + 10 − 2 ⎦⎣ 10 ⎦
𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑑 = ± 5. 1905555554 𝑜𝑟 ± 5. 19
Decision making
Given that the t-value, tind = 5.19, falls within the rejection region, the null hypothesis
can be rejected. Consequently, it can be concluded that there exists a significant difference
Table 1.1
1st Grading Averages Number of Male STEM Students with identical corresponding averages
86 1
88 1
89 1
90 3
92 1
93 1
95 1
96 1
Table 1.2
2nd Grading Averages Number of Male STEM Students with identical corresponding averages
88 1
89 1
90 2
92 1
93 1
94 1
95 2
96 1
Table 1.3
1st Grading Averages Number of Female STEM Students with identical corresponding averages
91 1
92 1
94 2
95 3
96 3
Table 1.4
2nd Grading Averages Number of Female STEM Students with identical corresponding averages
93 2
95 2
96 5
98 1
APPENDIX B
a. Computations
95.1 − 91.7
𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑑 = (10 − 1)(1.52388392675)²+(10 − 1)(2.83881822047)² 1 1
⎡ ⎤⎡ 10 + ⎤
⎣ 10 + 10 − 2 ⎦⎣ 10 ⎦
𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑑 = ± 5. 1905555554 𝑜𝑟 ± 5. 19
Female
96 + 95 + 95 + 96 + 92 + 95 + 96 + 97 + 96 + 93
10
= 95. 1
Male
96 + 89 + 90 + 92 + 90 + 92 + 92 + 94 + 95 + 87
10
= 91. 7
Female
(96 − 95. 1)², (95 − 95. 1)², (95 − 95. 1)², (96 − 95. 1)², (92 − 95. 1)²
(95 − 95. 1)², (96 − 95. 1)², (97 − 95. 1)², (96 − 95. 1)², (93 − 95. 1)²
0. 81 + 0. 1 + 0. 1 + 0. 81 + 9. 61 + 0. 1 + 0. 81 + 3. 61 + 0. 81 + 4. 41 = 20. 09
20.09
10−1
= 2. 32222222222
Male
(96 − 91. 7)², (89 − 91. 7)², (90 − 91. 7)², (92 − 91. 7)², (90 − 91. 7)²
(92 − 91. 7)², (92 − 91. 7)², (94 − 91. 7)², (95 − 91. 7)², (87 − 91. 7)²
72.53
10−1
= 8. 05888888889
𝑑𝑓 = 10 + 10 − 2 = 18
GIRLS
𝑥 𝑥 −𝑥 (𝑥 − 𝑥)² 𝑥 = 95. 1
95 − 0. 1 0. 01 𝑠² = 2.32222222222
95 − 0. 1 0. 01 𝑠 = 1. 52388392675
96 0. 9 0. 81
92 − 3. 1 9. 61
95 − 0. 1 0. 01
96 0. 9 0. 81
97 1. 9 3. 61
96 0. 9 0. 81
93 − 2. 1 4. 41
BOYS
𝑥 𝑥 −𝑥 (𝑥 − 𝑥)² 𝑥 = 91.7
89 − 2. 7 7.29 𝑠² = 8.05888888889
90 − 1. 7 2.89 𝑠 = 2. 83881822047
92 0. 3 0.9
90 − 1. 7 2.89
92 0.3 0.9
92 0.3 0.9
94 2.3 5.29
95 3.3 10.89
87 − 4. 7 22.09
c. Statistical Treatment
The statistical analysis conducted on two distinct groups will involve the application of
an independent t-test. This particular statistical test will enable us to evaluate and identify any
significant differences that may exist between the academic performances exhibited by the two
understanding of the divergent academic performances exhibited by the two unique sets of
Documentation
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL DATA
Nickname : Marcela
Age : 17
Gender : Female
Religion : Catholic
Nationality : Filipino
Language/Dialect/s : Tagalog/English
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL DATA
Nickname : Nina
Age : 16
Gender : Female
Religion : Catholic
Nationality : Filipino
Language/Dialect/s : Tagalog/English
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL DATA
Nickname : Erin
Age : 18
Gender : Female
Religion : Catholic
Nationality : Filipino
Language/Dialect/s : Tagalog/English
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL DATA
Nickname : JB
Age : 17
Gender : Male
Religion : Catholic
Nationality : Filipino
Language/Dialect/s : Tagalog/English
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL DATA
Nickname : Bless
Age : 17
Gender : Female
Religion : Catholic
Nationality : Filipino
Language/Dialect/s : Tagalog/English
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary School
VALENCIA, Alicia Gwenth V,
11 Vista Nila Homes, Azucena St,
Marikina, Metro Manila
+63 9685597823
avvalencia4122@student.fatima.edu.ph
PERSONAL DATA
Nickname : Noah
Age : 18
Gender : Female
Nationality : Filipino
Language/Dialect/s : Tagalog/English
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL DATA
Nickname : Yel
Age : 17
Gender : Female
Religion : Catholic
Nationality : Filipino
Language/Dialect/s : Tagalog/English
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL DATA
Nickname : None
Age : 18
Gender : Male
Religion : Catholic
Nationality : Filipino
Language/Dialect/s : Tagalog/English
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND