The Purposes of Education (Weeks 2-3)
The Purposes of Education (Weeks 2-3)
The Purposes of Education (Weeks 2-3)
FOCUS QUESTIONS
■ What trends show that teaching is becoming a full-fledged profession?
■ In what ways is teaching not fully a profession?
30
Is Teaching a Profession? ■ 31
Is Teaching a Profession?
The question of whether or not teaching is a profession in the fullest sense has
greatly concerned educators for many decades. Some have tried to identify the ideal
characteristics of professions and, by rating teachers on these items, determine
whether teaching is a profession. The following are characteristics of a full profes-
■ Characteristics of a sion, based on the works of noted authorities over a thirty-five-year period.1
profession
1. A sense of public service; a lifetime commitment to career
2. A defined body of knowledge and skills beyond that grasped by laypersons
3. A lengthy period of specialized training
4. Control over licensing standards and/or entry requirements
5. Autonomy in making decisions about selected spheres of work
6. An acceptance of responsibility for judgments made and acts performed re-
lated to services rendered; a set of performance standards
7. A self-governing organization composed of members of the profession
8. Professional associations and/or elite groups to provide recognition for indi-
vidual achievements
9. A code of ethics to help clarify ambiguous matters or doubtful points related
to services rendered
10. High prestige and economic standing
■ Teaching as a The general consensus is that teaching is not a profession in the fullest sense
“semiprofession” because it lacks some of the above characteristics, but it may be viewed as a “semi-
profession” or an “emerging profession” in the process of achieving these charac-
teristics.2 Several sociologists contend that nursing and social work are also
semiprofessions.
In particular, teaching seems to lag behind professions such as law and medi-
cine in four important areas: (1) a defined body of knowledge and skills beyond that
grasped by laypersons, (2) control over licensing standards and/or entry require-
ments, (3) autonomy in making decisions about selected spheres of work, and
(4) high prestige and economic standing. In the following sections we explore these
four aspects of teaching.
1
Ronald G. Corwin, Sociology of Education (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965); Robert
B. Howsam et al., Educating a Profession (Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges
for Teacher Education, 1976); and Susan J. Rosenholtz, Teachers’ Workplace: The Social Organi-
zation of Schools (New York: Longman, 1989).
2
Amitai Etzioni, The Semiprofessions and Their Organizations: Teachers, Nurses, and Social Work-
ers (New York: Free Press, 1969), p. v.
32 ■ Chapter 2 The Teaching Profession
3Robert J. Yinger and Amanda L. Nolen, “Surviving the Legitimacy Challenge,” Phi Delta
Kappan (January 2003), pp. 386–390; Susan Moore Johnson, “Can Professional Certification
of Teachers Reshape Teaching as a Career,” Phi Delta Kappan (January 2001), pp. 393–399.
4Hendrik D. Gideonse, Relating Knowledge to Teacher Education (Washington, D.C.: American
Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 1989); Brian Rowan, “Comparing Teachers’
Work with Work in Other Occupations: Notes on the Professional Status of Teaching,” Educa-
tional Researcher (August–September 1994), pp. 4–17, 21; and Jonathan Saphier, Bonfires and
Magic Bullets: Making Teaching a True Profession (Carlisle, Mass.: Research for Better Teach-
ing, 1995).
5James D. Koerner, The Miseducation of American Teachers (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1963).
6
See, for example, Pamela C. Boyd, “Professional School Reform and Public School Renewal:
Portrait of a Partnership,” Journal of Teacher Education (March–April 1994), pp. 132–139; and
Arthur E. Wise, “Creating a High Quality Teaching Force,” Educational Leadership (December
2000–January 2001), pp. 18–21.
Is Teaching a Profession? ■ 33
standards. Now, 60 percent of colleges are either accredited or are being considered
for accreditation. Most of the remaining five hundred teacher-education institutions
use NCATE standards to conduct state-level evaluations. Thus, by 2006, thirty-nine
states had adopted NCATE unit standards for state evaluation of teacher-education
programs, and all fifty states had adopted program standards in subject matter areas
or aligned them very closely. NCATE standards are increasingly the norm in teacher
preparation.7 Moreover, the American Association of Colleges for Teacher
R E F O C U S Is your institution accredited Education (AACTE) decided in 1995 to promote the pursuit of NCATE
by NCATE? Find out and learn more about accreditation. To further this end, AACTE is expanding technical assis-
the NCATE standards at their website,
tance, such as consultants to nonaccredited institutions, during the ac-
www.ncate.org.
creditation process.8
7
See “Quick Facts” at www.ncate.org/public/aboutncate.asp (2006); National Coun-
cil for the Accreditation of Teacher Education, A Decade of Growth: 1991–2001 (Wash-
ington, D.C.: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, 2001), p. 4.
8
“AACTE Strategic Plan Includes Focus on Accreditation,” NCATE Reporter (Washington, D.C.:
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, 1998), p. 5; and AACTE, “NCATE
Creates Task Force to Improve Program Reviews,” AACTE Briefs, August 25, 2003, pp. 1, 3.
9
Christopher Nagy and Ning Wang, “The Alternate Route: Teachers Transition to the Class-
room,” Online Submission, Annual Meeting of AERA, March 9, 2006; Lee S. Shulman,
“Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations and the New Reform,” Harvard Educational Review
(February 1987), p. 324.
10
Alternative Paths to Teaching (Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for
Teacher Education, 1995); Glen Buck et al., “Alternative Certification Programs,” Teacher
Education and Special Education (Winter 1995), pp. 39–48; Maryland State Department of
Education. “Maryland Teacher Staffing Report, 2005–2007” (Baltimore: Maryland State De-
partment of Education, 2007).
34 ■ Chapter 2 The Teaching Profession
11
Michael W. Apple, “Is There a Curriculum Voice to Reclaim?” Phi Delta Kappan (March
1990); Alfred G. Hess, “The Changing Role of Teachers: Moving from Interested Spectators to
Engaged Planners,” Education and Urban Society (May 1994), pp. 248–263; John J. DiNatale,
“School Improvement and Restructuring: A Threefold Approach,” NASSP Bulletin (October
1994), pp. 79–83; and Susan Moore Johnson, “Can Professional Certification for Teachers
Reshape Teaching as a Career,” Phi Delta Kappan (January 2001), pp. 393–399.
12C. C. North and Paul K. Hatt, “Jobs and Occupation: A Popular Evaluation,” Opinion News,
September 1, 1947, pp. 3–13; Robert W. Hodge, Paul M. Siegel, and Peter H. Rossi, “Occupa-
tional Prestige in the United States, 1925–63,” American Journal of Sociology (November 1964),
pp. 286–302; Donald J. Treiman, Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective (New York:
Academic Press, 1977); and Rowan, “Comparing Teachers’ Work with Work in Other Occupa-
tions,” pp. 4–17.
Is Teaching a Profession? ■ 35
■ Prestige derived from One reason why teachers have maintained or even increased their occupational
complex work prestige is that their average level of education has risen greatly over the past cen-
tury. Another reason may be the complex nature of teaching. Brian Rowan, com-
paring teachers’ work with other occupations, found that work complexity related
directly to occupational prestige. Teaching, more complex than 75 percent of all
other occupations, ranked quite high in prestige. The complexity of teachers’ work
is manifested in their need to apply principles of logical or scientific thinking to de-
fine problems, collect data, establish facts, and draw conclusions. To be a teacher,
you must be highly proficient in language (reading, writing, and speaking), and,
most of all, you must work effectively with many kinds of people—children, adoles-
cents, parents, colleagues, and superiors. This work with people sets teaching apart
from most other occupations. However, society accords higher prestige (and, of
course, higher pay) to professionals such as physicians, academics, lawyers, and en-
gineers, mainly because they must deal with information generally regarded as
more abstract (complex) and because these fields require more rigorous academic
preparation and licensure.13
■ Salary trends Although teachers’ salaries since 1930 have increased more than those of
■ Status-consistency the average industry worker, teacher pay remains lower than that of the average
hypothesis college graduate, such as an engineer, nurse, accountant, or business major.14 In
addition, teachers still earn far less than lawyers, business executives, and some
other professionals with similar levels of formal education. For example,
R E F O C U S Which of the preceding areas of your classmates who become business executives with a level of formal
professionalism—a defined body of knowledge, education similar to yours as a teacher might earn $150,000 per year, and
control of licensing and entry, autonomy in
some might earn $500,000 or more. Nevertheless, the status-consistency
decision making, or high prestige and economic
hypothesis holds that a group tends to compare its achievements (both
standing—is most important to your personal
definition of a profession? Is it important to you prestige and salary) with those of other groups, striving to match the re-
that teaching seems to lag behind other wards of people with similar jobs and similar years of education.15 If this
professions in these areas? Why or why not? is true, we can expect teachers to compare their lot with other groups’
and feel somewhat dissatisfied. In the past this dissatisfaction has been a
major reason for teacher militancy, and it has motivated some teachers to leave the
profession.16
■ Teacher status on the rise To its credit, educational reform has put teachers in the limelight and has
brought pressure on school districts to increase salaries. Though optimistic projec-
tions have not always been fulfilled,17 the earnings gap between teachers and other
highly educated groups may now begin to close. With help from their own pro-
fessional organizations, coupled with pressure to upgrade educational standards,
teachers should continue to experience increased status.
13
Eric Hoyle, “Teaching: Prestige, Status and Esteem,” Educational Management and Administra-
tion (April 2001), pp. 139–152.
14
Dan Goldhaber and Daniel Player, “What Different Benchmarks Suggest About How Finan-
cially Attractive It Is to Teach in Public Schools,” Journal of Education Finance (Winter 2005),
pp. 211–230;Victor R. Lindquist and Frank S. Endicott, The Northwestern Lindquist–Endicott
Report: Employment Trends for College Graduates, Forty-sixth Annual Survey (Evanston, Ill.:
Northwestern University, 1992); Steven L. Denlinger, “A Look at the Problem of Teacher
Deficits,” Clearing House (January–February 2002), pp. 116–117.
15
David J. Hoff, “Politics Pulls Teacher to Forefront,” Education Week (January 2006), pp. 1,
21, 24.
16
Jo Anna Natale, “Why Teachers Leave,” Executive Educator (November 1993), pp. 8–15; and
Patricia Gonzales, “Strategies for Teacher Retention,” NSTEP Information Brief (Alexandria,
Va.: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, 1995).
17
Allan C. Ornstein, “Teacher Salaries in Social Context,” High School Journal (December-
January 1990), pp. 129–132; see also “Just the Stats,” at www.nea.org/publiced/edstats; and
Southern Regional Education Board, SREB Teacher Salaries: Update for 1995–96 and Estimated
Increases for 1997 (Atlanta, Ga.: SREB, 1996).
36 ■ Chapter 2 The Teaching Profession
18Louis Fischer, David Schimmel, and Leslie Stellman, Teachers and the Law (New York: Long-
man, 2007 ), pp. 44–56; Lynn M. Cornett, “Lessons from 10 Years of Teacher Improvement
Reforms,” Educational Leadership (February 1995), pp. 26–30; and Bobby Ann Starnes,
“Thoughts on Teaching: John L. Lewis, Jesus, and President Bush,” Phi Delta Kappan (Febru-
ary 2004), p. 475.
19
Denny G. Bolton, “Better Bargaining: Common Mistakes in Contract Negotiations and
How to Avoid Them,” American School Board Journal (March 2001), pp. 16–20.
20Perry A. Zirkel, “Striking Results,” Phi Delta Kappan (February 2003), pp. 478–479; and
William Keene, “Win/Win or Else”: Collective Bargaining in an Age of Public Discontent (Thou-
sand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press, 1996).
Trends Toward Professionalism ■ 37
■ A national board Some educators favor a single national board rather than independent state
boards. This has always been the position of the American Federation of Teachers
(AFT), and the idea has been welcomed by many national task force groups. As men-
tioned in the chapter on Motivation, Preparation, and Conditions for the Entering
Teacher, the Carnegie Corporation has helped to found the National Board for Pro-
fessional Teaching Standards (NBPTS). The NEA now supports this organization
because two-thirds of the NBPTS directors are “teaching professionals”—that is, rep-
resentatives of teacher unions, subject-area associations, and teachers noted for
classroom excellence.21 Currently, the NBPTS has granted national certification to
more than fifty thousand teachers in twenty-four certificate fields.22 Although
NBPTS certification is voluntary and cannot be required as a condition of hiring,
many educators hope that local school boards and superintendents will develop in-
centives to encourage teachers to apply for national certification.23 All fifty states
have already initiated support in the form of certification fee reimbursement or
salary supplements.24 For more information on national board standards and the
twenty-four certification areas, see .nbpts.org/about.
Mediated Entry
Mediated entry refers to the practice of inducting persons into a profession
through carefully supervised stages that help them learn how to apply professional
knowledge successfully in working environments. For example, aspiring physicians
serve one or more years as interns and then as residents before being considered
full-fledged professionals.
■ Lack of assistance for new Dan Lortie has studied the teacher’s job from a sociological perspective and has
teachers concluded that teaching ranks between occupations characterized by “casual” entry
and those that place difficult demands on would-be members. For example, secre-
tarial knowledge and skills are significantly less demanding than those of a medical
doctor or even a nurse.25 The lack of more carefully mediated entry means that new
teachers have relatively little opportunity to benefit from the principles and prac-
tices developed by earlier educators. Too often teachers report learning to teach
through trial and error in the classroom. They also report that the beginning years
of teaching can be a period of anxiety, loneliness, and fear, even of trauma.26 Al-
though almost any occupation or profession produces problems and anxieties at
first, a more systematic mediated entry would probably alleviate some stress.
21John W. Porter, “A Call for National Certification of Teachers,” NASSP Bulletin (October
1990), pp. 64–70; Bess Keller, “NBPTS Upgrades Profession, Most Agree, Despite Test Score
Letdown,” Education Week (May 2006), p. 5; Donna H. Leuker, “Certification: Teachers at the
Top of Their Profession,” American School Board Journal (June 1994), p. 24; and Albert
Shanker, “Quality Assurance: What Must Be Done to Strengthen the Teaching Profession,”
Phi Delta Kappan (November 1996), pp. 220–224.
22Available at www.nea.org/national, board/background-facts; Holly Thornton, “The Mean-
ing of National Board Certification for Middle Grades Teaching,” Middle School Journal
(March 2001), pp. 46–54.
23
The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards 2006, at www.nbpts.org.
24American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, “NBPTS Study: Teachers Who
Attained Board Certification Outperform Those Who Didn’t Succeed,” Teacher Education
Reports, November 27, 2000, p. 2.
25
Dan C. Lortie, Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
1975).
26
Barry A. Farber, Crisis in Education: Stress and Burnout in the American Teacher (San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass, 1991); Pamela L. Grossman, The Making of a Teacher (New York: Teachers College
Press, 1990); Susan Moore Johnson, Teachers at Work (New York: Harper and Row, 1990); and
Anne Cockburn, Teaching Under Pressure (Bristol, Pa.: Falmer, 1996).
38 ■ Chapter 2 The Teaching Profession
Online Study Center After reading this section, watch “Teacher Accountability: A Student Teacher’s Perspective.”
In this video, you’ll see a roundtable discussion about how teachers approach ac-
countability in a positive and nonthreatening way that benefits both teachers and
VIDEO CASE:
students. How can you relate to some of the concerns that student teacher Caitlin
Teacher Hollister has (see Interview Transcript #2)? After watching the video, answer the
following questions:
Accountability:
How does this video case illustrate the concept of “mediated entry” described
A Student Teacher’s in the chapter?
Perspective In your opinion, what insights has Caitlin gained about teaching as a result of
being mentored by a group of experience teachers?
**This Video Case reinforces key concepts found in Section IV: Profession and Community of the Praxis II
Exam.**
■ Professional development More colleges and universities are using professional development schools (de-
schools as clinical settings scribed in the chapter on Motivation, Preparation, and Conditions for the Enter-
ing Teacher) as clinical settings where aspiring teachers gain a year of classroom
experience before student teaching (residency). This multisemester approach—in
actual classrooms under the guidance of experienced teachers and their university
professors—provides a more systematic induction into the teaching profession.27
■ Establishing a transition The teaching profession now recognizes the need to develop a period of induc-
period tion and transition into teaching, especially given that approximately 45 percent of
new teachers leave the profession by the end of year five. During your first few
years of teaching, you may be considered a probationary teacher. Since the early
1980s, more than thirty states have mandated statewide initiatives or have provided
funds for this purpose. Some school districts, such as Toledo, Ohio, provide proba-
tionary or intern teachers with feedback and assistance from experienced teachers.
Performance-assessment approaches can help determine whether new teachers
have mastered some of the most important teaching skills. Other districts assign
specially trained mentor teachers or support teams to work closely with new teach-
ers, particularly those assigned to teach “high-risk” students.28 Mentor teachers may
receive released time or stipends for helping new teachers. In many other school dis-
tricts, all teachers are evaluated, but expectations and training sessions differ for
probationary teachers and experienced teachers.29 Some colleges and universities
provide transitional guidance for graduates who will teach, either through direct
27Sharon Castle, “Do Professional Development Schools (PDS) Make a Difference?” Journal of
Teacher Education (January/February 2006), pp. 65–80; Thomas Guskey, “What Makes Profes-
sional Development Effective,” Phi Delta Kappan (June 2003), pp. 748–750; Ann Reynolds,
Steven Ross, and Janine Rakow, “Teacher Retention, Teaching Effectiveness, and Professional
Preparation: A Comparison of Professional Development School and Non-Professional Devel-
opment School Graduates,” Teaching and Teacher Education (April 2002), pp. 289–303.
28Susan Moore Johnson and Susan Kardos, “Keeping New Teachers in Mind,” Educational
supervision or through staff development or both. Overall, the trend toward more
carefully mediated entry should continue; major teacher unions and several educa-
tion reform groups support it, as does federal legislation such as No Child Left Be-
hind, which mandates “highly qualified teachers.” (We define and discuss highly
qualified in the chapter on Motivation, Preparation, and Conditions for the Entering
Teacher.)
■ Keeping up to date
Staff Development
Your teacher training does not end when you begin teaching full time. Teaching de-
mands rigorous and continuous training, which we often refer to as staff develop-
ment, or further education and training for a school district’s teaching staff. To stay
up to date in their preparation and to acquire new classroom skills, teachers have
traditionally participated in various kinds of in-service training, or completion of a
master’s degree. In most states completion of a master’s degree, either in a content
field or in professional education coursework, automatically makes one a “highly
■ Rising importance of staff qualified teacher” (HQT).
development Both the NEA and the AFT support the concept of staff development as integral
to a teacher’s professional growth. U.S. teachers are an aging group (the average
teacher is about fifty years old and has twenty years of experience), and many states
now require teachers to participate in staff development programs in order to retain
their teaching certificates. Younger teachers, those with less than ten years’ experi-
ence, tend to use staff development programs to pursue new degrees (mostly mas-
ter’s degrees), whereas veteran teachers with ten or more years’ experience are more
likely to participate in specialized workshops or in-service training.30 Staff develop-
ment topics in high demand include improving students’ reading and writing skills,
working with special-needs students, inclusion students, working with diverse pop-
ulations, active learning strategies, curriculum revision, site-based management,
■ Training in educational and legal issues and concerns.
technology and research Another important focus for staff development is improving teachers’ knowl-
edge and skills in using educational technology. This effort ranges from teaching ba-
sic computer literacy—such as word processing, creating PowerPoint presentations,
and developing grade spreadsheets—to teaching more sophisticated use of Internet
resources—such as interactive video, CD-ROM videodisks, and distance learning.31
The AFT has also developed its Educational Research and Dissemination (ER&D)
program to expose teachers to the growing body of important education research
findings. A series of collegial workshops explore the latest research and prac-
tical classroom applications. Universities have trained more than fifteen hundred
teachers to act as workshop leaders, and the program continues to grow.32 As the
30The Condition of Education (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2002),
TECHNOLOGY @ SCHOOL
Professional Development Opportunities on the World Wide Web
W
hether you are preparing to teach, experiencing homework helpers, and the curriculum center, where you
your first year in the classroom, or a veteran will find classroom activities supporting core curriculum
teacher, professional growth and development topics.These are only a few of the many resources available
are critical to your success in teaching.The Internet pro- at this site.
vides a rich array of technology resources for teachers, Beginning and veteran teachers can find Internet re-
students, and even parents. sources in just about any subject area, including math, sci-
Novice teachers especially need job search informa- ence, social studies, English/language arts, art, and music.
tion, such as résumé writing and interviewing tips, as A great deal of information is available for teacher lesson
well as information on substitute teaching jobs, certifi- plans that make use of newspaper articles, technology
cation, and professional expectations and behavior (at applications, writing activities, analysis of magazine and
http//u.s.geocities.yahoo.com/search?p=student+teach journal articles, slide shows, videos, assessment rubrics and
er+resource. Click on “Student Teacher Resource Source” workshops, some of which are actually online. Many of
for all sorts of lesson plans, job searching tips, and these sites have links to additional resource sites. (Look at
resources.) Kathy Schrock’s “Guide for Educators—Internet Informa-
This site covers all of these topics and more. New teach- tion” at http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/ for
ers can also consult this site for tips on organizing class- helpful links that are updated each week.) Searching
rooms, bulletin board ideas, teaching strategies, resources Google for “Teacher Internet Resources” will yield addi-
for educators, class management, block schedules, motivat- tional excellent sites.
ing students, and even workshops on assessment rubrics. As you move from preservice to the full-time practice of
Preservice teachers can find free résumé advice, sample teaching, you will want to familiarize yourself with profes-
résumés, and assistance with building a personal résumé at sional development activities for certified teachers avail-
“schoolcareer.com.” Job search information is also available able at PBS Teacher Line (teacherline.pbs.org). Here
at this site. You will want to visit Kathy Schrock’s “Guide to teachers can select from more than ninety online courses
Educators” (http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/) as by clicking on “About Courses” and “Course Catalog.” For
well, where you will find a wide range of Internet resources, teacher resources click on “Resources” and select resources
such as teacher helper, search tools, puzzle makers, clip art, for math, science, reading, language arts, and technology
brain boosters, new sites this month, teaching tools, videos, and curriculum integration.
Technology @ School box describes, teachers can also use the Internet for profes-
sional development.
New varieties of staff development programs are giving teachers a major voice
in decisions that affect their professional careers. These programs also help to estab-
lish the concept that teaching, like other full-fledged professions, requires lengthy
and ongoing training,
Merit Pay
■ Critiques of merit pay Real changes in teacher remuneration are under way. A growing number of school
boards have taken the position that merit pay (a supplement to a teacher’s base
salary to reward superior performance) is a cost-effective method of motivating
teachers and encouraging excellence in teaching. However, teacher unions and
other critics have expressed reservations about merit pay plans. Some argue that
teachers’ work is complicated and difficult to measure, and assessments of merit are
too often subjective, especially when left in the hands of a single person—the
Trends Toward Professionalism ■ 41
school principal.33 Teachers and their professional organizations feel more comfort-
able with peer evaluations. Where merit plans have been implemented, according to
some reports, teachers have often believed that the wrong people were selected for
preferential pay. Some observers fear that such rewards go to relatively few teachers
at the expense of many others and threaten unity and collegiality among educators.
Moreover, merit pay funding has often been inadequate. The need, critics say, is to
increase all teachers’ salaries, not just a few, and not to pit teachers against one an-
other.34 The Taking Issue box presents some arguments for and against merit pay.
■ Career ladders Even as the arguments continue, the concept of merit pay has spread to many
school districts and to entire states. Today, merit pay plans are sometimes linked
with career ladders, which establish clear-cut stages through which a teacher may ad-
vance. North Carolina in 1991 implemented a statewide merit plan called “differ-
ential pay,” whereby local school districts receive up to 3 percent above their
normal salary totals to allocate to teachers on the basis of merit or additional re-
sponsibilities.35 Overall, the trend toward raising the ceiling on teachers’ salaries
and making distinctions based on merit should attract brighter students into the
profession and keep good teachers from leaving classrooms for more competitive
salaries in other fields.
School-Based Management
■ Decision making at the Many educational reforms, as we have seen, involve a movement toward teacher
school level empowerment—increasing teachers’ participation in decisions that affect their own
work and careers. One such reform is school-based management (also known as
site-based management, site-based decision making, or collaborative decision making), a
system in which individual schools rather than superintendents or boards of educa-
tion make many decisions about curriculum, instruction, staff development, alloca-
tion of funds, and staffing assignments. School teachers, administrators, and often
parents together develop their own plan for the school’s future.
■ Teachers as experts The assumption underlying school-based management is that people who
share in responsibilities and decisions will believe in what they are doing and will
work more effectively toward common goals. This concept of reform also recognizes
that teachers are experts whose talents should be put to use in planning. The reform
plans in Dade County, Florida, and Rochester, New York (described in the chapter
on Motivation, Preparation, and Conditions for the Entering Teacher), include a
generous dose of school-based management. Other districts with similar plans in-
clude Louisville, Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and Baltimore.
33
Jennifer Azordegan et al., “Diversifying Teacher Compensation,” Issue Paper. (Denver:
Education Commission for the States, 2005); Ron Brandt, “On Research on Teaching,” Educa-
tional Leadership (April 1992), pp. 14–19; and Stephen Jacobsen, “Money Incentives and the
Reform of Teacher Compensation: A Persistent Dilemma,” International Journal of Educational
Reform (January 1995), pp. 29–35.
34
Carolyn McCreight, “Teacher Attrition, Shortage, and Strategies for Teacher Retention”
(2000), ERIC Document: ED 444986; Melissa McCabe,”Weighing the Merits: Several States
Are Implementing Pay-for-Performance Plans, Teacher Magazine (March/April 2005), p. 22;
Dale Ballou, “Pay for Performance in Public and Private Schools,” Economics of Education
Review (February 2001), pp. 51–61; and Larry Lashway, “Incentives for Accountability,” 2002,
ERIC No: ED 457598.
35
Jeffrey T. Sultanik, “Bonus Pay for Teachers,” American School Board Journal (February 2000),
pp. 34–36; Marge Scherer, “Improving the Quality of the Teaching Force: A Conversation
with David C. Berliner,” Educational Leadership (May 2001), pp. 6–10.
42 ■ Chapter 2 The Teaching Profession
TAKING ISSUE
Merit Pay
Traditionally, teachers have earned salaries based on their years in teaching and their highest degree obtained. Recent
plans, however, offer extra pay to teachers considered above average in teaching skills, work habits, leadership, or student
achievement.
Question
Should individual teachers receive special pay increases based on merit?
■ Willingness to get involved The fate of school-based management rests especially on the relationship between
principals and their teachers, on the willingness of teachers to take responsibility for
directing their own behavior, and on the amount of extra time teachers are willing to
devote to working out problems and reaching consensus.36 Advocates of school-based
management claim that most teachers welcome the increased involvement and that
teacher morale and the overall climate of the school dramatically improve.37
36Betsy Brand, “Enhancing High School Reform: Lessons from Site Visits to Four Cities,”
Washington, D.C.: American Youth Policy Forum, 2005; and Frank Brown, “Site-Based Man-
agement: Is It Still Central to the School Reform Movement?” School Business Affairs (April
2001), pp. 5–6, 8–9.
37 Mary Apodaca-Tucker, “School-Based Management: Views from Public and Private Elemen-
tary School Principals,” Education Policy Analysis Archives (April 2002), p. 23; Hess, “The Chang-
ing Role of Teachers,” pp. 248–263; and Neil Dempster, “The Impact and Effects of Site-Based
Management on Schools,” Journal of Educational Administration (January 2000), pp. 47–63.
Teacher Organizations ■ 43
Online Study Center Watch Teaching as a Profession: Collaboration with Colleagues and think about what collab-
oration as a teacher means to you.What do you think are the challenges and rewards
VIDEO CASE: associated with collaboration? After watching the video, answer the following
questions:
Teaching as a Explain how the teachers in this video case exemplify the concepts of teacher em-
powerment and site-based decision making that are described in this chapter.
Profession:
In this video case, we meet a group of teachers who are trying to address an im-
Collaboration with portant issue related to the school’s math curriculum. Is their collaboration success-
Colleagues ful? Why or why not?
**This Video Case reinforces key concepts found in Section IV: Profession and Community of the Praxis II
Exam.**
■ Critiques of school-based Critics contend that the result of collaboration is often not useful. Considerable
management time, they say, is devoted to discussing daily teaching problems such as classroom
management, equipment needs, clerical routines, and working conditions;
R E F O C U S How do you believe movements thus little time remains for the larger issue of school effectiveness. In addi-
toward increasing professionalism in teaching
tion, some administrators argue that many teachers untrained in shared
will affect you? Will you look for a position in a
leadership, instead of cooperating, may revert to a hostile collective-
school that makes a strong effort to help new
teachers? Would you prefer a mediated-entry bargaining stance.38 In addition, some districts have found it difficult
program similar to that in the medical to develop meaningful parental involvement in school-based decision
profession, with intern and resident teacher making.39
levels, before you become a full-fledged Expanding school-based management will require patience and a
professional teacher? How can you prepare willingness to work out differences in expectations. Once in practice,
yourself to effectively carry out the shared however, shared decision making helps empower teachers and further
leadership responsibilities of school-based enhances their professional status.
management?
Teacher Organizations
■ NEA and AFT Although today’s working conditions need improvement, they sharply contrast
with the restrictions teachers once endured. For example, a Wisconsin teacher’s
contract for 1922 prohibited a woman teacher from dating, marrying, staying out
past 8 P.M., smoking, drinking, loitering in ice cream parlors, dyeing her hair, and
using mascara or lipstick.40 A critical factor in the development of teaching as a pro-
fession has been the growth of professional organizations for teachers. The Na-
tional Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers
38Kerri Briggs and Priscilla Whalstetter, “Key Elements of a Successful School-Based Manage-
ment System,” School Effectiveness and School Improvement (September 2003), pp. 351–372;
Alan B. Henkin, Peter J. Cistone, and Jay Dee, “Conflict Management Strategies of Principals
in Site-Based Managed Schools,” Journal of Educational Administration (February 2000), pp.
42–58; Bruce R. Brown and G. Robb Cooper, “School-Based Management: How Effective Is
It?” NASSP Bulletin (May 2000), pp. 77–85; and Kubilay Gok et al., “The Demands of Decen-
tralizaton: Skills and Knowledge for Leaders in Restructured Schools,” online submission,
AERA Meeting, San Francisco, California, 2005.
39
Eddy Van Meter, “Implementing School-Based Decision Making in Kentucky,” NASSP Bul-
letin (September 1994), pp. 61–70; Alan Riley, “Parent Empowerment: An Idea for the
Nineties,” Education Canada (Fall 1994), pp. 14–20; and Lynn Beck and Joseph Murphy,
“Parental Involvement in Site-Based Management: Lessons from One Site,” International
Journal of Leadership in Education (April-June 1999), pp. 81–102.
40
Chicago Tribune, September 28, 1975, sect. 1, p. 3.
44 ■ Chapter 2 The Teaching Profession
Questions
1. What further information should Anna seek before trying to join the site-based decision-making team?
2. What do you think about Julia’s view that only experienced teachers will be selected or elected to serve on the SBDMT?
3. Why might some teachers object to serving on an SBDMT?
4. In your opinion, is Anna’s plan likely to be more or less effective than complaints in the teachers’ lounge?
(AFT), the two most important, usually are considered rivals, competing for mem-
bers, recognition, and power. Overview 2.1 sums up major differences between the
two organizations. Although some educators believe that this division produces
healthy professional competition, others consider it detrimental to the teaching
profession—a splitting of power and a waste of resources. Still others argue that teach-
ers will not attain full professional status until one unified voice speaks for them.
■ Benefits of organizational Regardless of which teacher organization you prefer or are inclined to join, the
membership important step is to make a commitment and to be an active member. Organiza-
tional membership will increase your own professionalism and gain you collegial
Teacher Organizations ■ 45
OVERVIEW 2.1
Comparison of the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation
of Teachers (AFT)
NEA AFT
Total membership (2006) 2,800,000 1,300,000
relationships. Your support also helps to improve salary, working conditions, and
benefits for many teachers. In addition, reading the journals, magazines, or newslet-
ters that most professional organizations publish, as well as visiting their Web sites,
will keep you abreast of the latest developments in the field. See Suggested Re-
sources at the end of this chapter.
monthly newspaper, NEA Today. Most of the fifty state affiliates publish a
REFOCUS Which goals and activities seem
more appealing to you, those of the NEA or monthly magazine as well.
those of the AFT? Why?
American Federation of Teachers (AFT)
■ AFT membership Formed in 1916, the AFT is affiliated with the AFL-CIO labor organization. Origi-
nally open only to classroom teachers, in 1976, to increase membership, the AFT
targeted professional employees such as nurses and nonprofessional school per-
sonnel such as cafeteria, custodial, maintenance, and transportation workers. Mem-
bership in 2006 stood at just over 1.3 million (Table 2.1), of whom 650,000 were
teachers.
■ AFT services In the past, the AFT has supported less research and publication than the NEA,
but the union does publish a professional magazine, American Educator, and a
monthly newspaper, American Teacher. In addition, local affiliates each produce a
monthly newsletter. Unlike the NEA, the AFT has always required its members to
join the local (3,000 affiliates), state (forty-three states), and national organizations
simultaneously.44
■ The AFT and teacher The AFT expanded rapidly in the 1960s and 1970s when its affiliates spear-
militancy headed a dramatic increase in teacher strikes and other militant actions. The AFT be-
came the dominant teacher organization in many large urban centers where unions
have traditionally flourished, where militant tactics have been common, and where
teachers in general have wanted a powerful organization to represent them. In rural
and suburban areas, where union tactics have received less support, the NEA re-
mains dominant.
In addition to the NEA and AFT, more than 325 other national teacher organi-
zations exist.45 In the following sections we describe some of the basic types.
Source: “The AFT Soars,” The 1988–90 Report of the Officers of the American Federation of Teachers (Washington, D.C.: AFT, 1990), p. 15; NEA Hand-
book, 1986–87 (Washington, D.C.: NEA, 1986), Table 4, p. 142; NEA Handbook, 1994–95 (Washington, D.C.: NEA, 1995), Table 1, p. 164; and NEA
Handbook, 1997–98, Table 1, p. 166; see http://www.nea.org/aboutnea/ (2006).
Parent-Teacher Groups
■ PTA membership Parent-teacher groups provide a forum for parents and teachers to work together in
resolving educational problems on the local, state, and national levels. As a teacher,
you can take an active part in these associations and work with parents on curricu-
lum and instructional programs, student policy, and school-community relations.
46Letterfrom and telephone conversation with Heidi Wunder, public relations assistant,
National Catholic Education Association, August 27, 2003; telephone conversation with
Virginia Crowther, office manager-membership, National Association of Catholic School
Teachers, March 16, 2001.
47Wunder, NCEA, March 16, 2001; see www.pta.org/aboutus (2006); Also see
www.nea.org/about (2006)
48 ■ Chapter 2 The Teaching Profession
OVERVIEW 2.2
Major Specialized Professional Organizations for Teachers
Organizations That Focus on Organizations That Focus on Student Type
Specific Subject Matter or Age Level
1. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recre- 1. American Association for Gifted Children
ation and Dance 2. American Association of Workers for the Blind
2. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign 3. American Association for Asian Studies
Languages
4. American Montessori Society
3. American Industrial Arts Association
5. American Speech-Language-Hearing
4. American School Health Association Association
5. American Vocational Association 6. Association for Childhood Education
6. Association for Education in Journalism International
7. International Reading Association 7. Association for Children with Learning Disabilities
8. Modern Language Association 8. Council for Exceptional Children
9. Music Teachers National Association 9. Music Teachers National Association
10. National Art Education Association 10. National Art Education Association
11. National Business Education Association 11. National Business Education Association
12. National Council for the Social Studies 12. National Council for the Social Studies
13. National Council of Teachers of English 13. National Council of Teachers of English
14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
15. National Science Teachers Association 15. National Science Teachers Association
48
Partners in Education: Teachers in the PTA (Chicago: National PTA, 1987); telephone conver-
sation with Patricia Yoxall, director of public relations, National PTA, March 16, 2001; and
Ginny Markel, “Rural Communities Matter: How PTAs Can Increase Parent Involvement in
Our Nation’s Small Towns,” Our Children (November 2000), p. 3.
49
See www.pta.org/ap_faq2006.
Teacher Organizations ■ 49
OVERVIEW 2.3
Professional Organizations Students Can Join
Name and Location Membership Profile Focus Major Journals
Student National Undergraduate students Future teachers, under- Tomorrow’s Teachers
Education Association, (46,000) standing the profession, (annual), NEA Today
Washington, D.C. liability coverage (monthly)
www.nea.org
Pi Lambda Theta, Undergraduate and graduate Honorary association, Educational Horizons
Bloomington, Ind. students, teachers, and teaching (quarterly)
administrators (11,500)
Phi Delta Kappa, Undergraduate and graduate Honorary association; Phi Delta Kappan
Bloomington, Ind. students, teachers, research; service, (monthly), Fastbacks at
www.pdkintl.org administrators, and leadership, and teaching; reduced rates
professors (130,000) issues, trends, and policies
Kappa Delta Pi, Lafayette, Graduate students, teachers, Honorary association, Educational Forum
Ind. www.kdp.org administrators, and teaching (quarterly), Kappa Delta Pi
professors (29,700); Record (quarterly)
undergraduate students
(25,300)
American Educational Graduate students and Research and its Educational Researcher
Research Association, professors (22,500), application to education (bimonthly), American
Washington, D.C. undergraduate students Educational Research
http://aera.net (4,500) Journal (quarterly), Review
of Educational Research
(quarterly), Educational
Evaluation and Policy
Analysis (quarterly)
programs related to reading, urban education, sex education and AIDS education,
child nutrition and safety education, and drug abuse prevention, as well as improv-
ing school discipline and combating censorship of school and library materials.
Summing Up
It is generally agreed that teaching, although not yet a requiring lengthy and continued training. Merit
full profession, is moving toward becoming one. pay and school-based management provide oppor-
tunities for increased salaries and more professional
Collective bargaining is an integral part of the teaching
responsibilities.
profession, giving teachers greater authority to deter-
mine working conditions and their effectiveness as The NEA and AFT now represent a large majority of
teachers. classroom teachers; these organizations have improved
teachers’ salaries and working conditions and have
Many education trends are raising the level of teacher
gained them a greater voice in decisions that affect
professionalism. State professional practice boards and
teaching and learning in schools.
the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards,
for example, enable teachers to participate in setting Many professional organizations are open to under-
criteria for entering the profession. Mediated-entry graduate students or to graduate students and teach-
and staff development programs help establish the ers. All provide valuable information and services to
idea that teaching is a full-fledged profession educators at different career levels.
Key Terms
profession (31) National Board for Professional National Education Association (NEA) (43)
National Council for Accreditation of Teaching Standards (37) American Federation of Teachers
Teacher Education (32) mediated entry (37) (AFT) (43)
occupational prestige (34) staff development (39) parent-teacher groups (47)
collective bargaining (36) merit pay (40) Parent-Teacher Association (PTA) (48)
professional practice board (36) school-based management (41)
Certification Connection
Chapter 2 introduces teaching as a profession. A professional find the journal that best fits your major. Read one article on
is a lifelong learner, one that continues to learn outside of the currect research in your subject or area of certification. In your
university. One of the main ways that a professional learns is journal, reflect on how that practice or research might affect
from professional journals. To prepare for the Praxis II ques- your teaching as practice for the Praxis II.
tions about teacher professionalism, go to your library and
Discussion Questions
In your opinion, is teaching a profession or not? What Are staff development programs essential for maintain-
changes might make teaching a true profession? What ing high-quality teaching? If so, what should their main
does teacher professionalism mean to you? focus be? Who should design these programs and how?
What special relationships does your college of educa- Do you agree with proponents of school-based manage-
tion have with area school districts and/or schools? How ment that teachers should have a greater role in manag-
do these relationships enhance your preparation as well ing schools? As a teacher, what kinds of decisions would
as the work of the teachers and administrators? How you like to be involved in? In what, if any, areas of school
could these be improved? management would you rather not be involved, and why?
Suggested Resources ■ 51
Suggested Resources
Brimelow, Peter. The Worm in the Apple: How Teacher’s Unions
Internet Resources
Are Destroying Public Education. New York: HarperCollins,
Information about many of the organizations discussed in 2003. A one-sided, but thoughtful, view of teachers’ unions,
this chapter can be found on the World Wide Web. For exam- their philosophies and tactics.
ple, the NEA maintains a home page at www.nea.org; the AFT
Conant, James B. The Education of American Teachers. New
is at www.aft.org; and the National PTA is at www.pta.org. In
York: McGraw-Hill, 1964. A classic text on improving
addition, the Usenet offers access to many news and discus-
teacher education and teacher professionalism.
sion groups related to education; some of them, such as
k12.chat.teacher, focus on topics of particular concern to el- Darling-Hammond, Linda, ed. Professional Development
ementary and secondary school teachers. In exploring spe- Schools: Schools for Developing a Profession. New York:
cific topics such as staff development and educational Teachers’ College Press, 2005. An excellent book on pro-
technology; the biggest problem often is deciding which of fessional development schools, their rationale, and their
the many good sites to visit first. A general Internet search will many merits.
provide a good start. For staff development, try the National Early, Peter. Leading and Managing Continuing Professional
Staff Development Council at www.nsdc.org. For educational Development: Developing People, Developing Schools.
technology, search the federal government site at www London: Paul Chapman, 2004. A thorough look at
.ed.gov. For information on national board certification stan- professional development in Great Britain, comparing
dards, consult the NBPTS site at www.nbpts.org. and contrasting it to professional development in the
United States.
Publications Elliot, Emmerson J. Assessing Education Candidate Perfor-
Apple, Michael W. Educating the Right Way: Markets, Stan- mance: A Look at Changing Practices. Washington, D.C.:
dards, God and Inequality. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Educa-
2006. Analysis of the growing power of conservative move- tion, 2003. Describes a shift from what institutions offer
ments on educational policy and practice. their candidates to what candidates receive—that is,
evidence that candidates have the knowledge, skills, and
Bascia, Nina. Unions in Teachers’ Professional Lives. New York:
dispositions necessary to teach and put these attributes
Teachers College Press, 1994. A case study book on teach-
into action so that all students will learn.
ers’ unions.
52 ■ Chapter 2 The Teaching Profession
Hannaway, Jane, and Andrew Rotherham. Collective Bargain- Neapolitan, Jane, ed. Staying the Course with Professional
ing in Education: Negotiating Change in Today’s Schools. Development Schools. New York: P. Lang, 2005. A compre-
Boston: Harvard Educational Publications Group, 2006. hensive look at the PDS movement, its strengths and short-
A well-written and fair look at the collective bargaining comings as well as its promise for the future.
process and its impact on educational change. Ornstein, Allan C. Teaching: Theory into Practice. Boston: Allyn
Johnson, Susan Moore. Teachers at Work. New York: Harper and Bacon, 1995. Designed to help students reflect on
and Row, 1990. The rules and responsibilities teachers teaching in both the theoretical and the practical sense.
adopt in classrooms and schools. Perlmutter, Jane, and Louise Burrell. The First Weeks of School:
Maeroff, Gene I. Education and Change: A Personal Critique. Laying a Quality Foundation. Portsmouth: Heinemann,
Fastback #466. Bloomington, Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa Edu- 2001. An excellent book for beginning teachers that ad-
cational Foundation, 2000. A thoughtful reflection on and dresses the weeks before the school year begins, the first
analysis of changes in public education and suggestions day of school, those early weeks, survival, and roadblocks
for schools in the twenty-first century. to success. Must reading for first-year teachers!
McCarty, Hannoch, and Frank Siccone. Motivating Your Reynolds, Larry J. Successful Site-Based Management: A Practi-
Students: Before You Can Teach Them You Have to cal Guide. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press, 1997. An
Reach Them. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001. A stimulat- excellent guidebook for introducing a systemwide ap-
ing book written for both new and veteran teachers with proach to site-based management as a strategy for school
scores of suggestions for motivating both students and improvement.
teacher. Walling, Donovan R., ed. Teachers as Leaders: Perspectives on
Murray, Frank. The Teacher Educator’s Handbook: Building a the Professional Development of Teachers. Bloomington,
Knowledge Base for the Preparation of Teachers. San Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 1994. A
Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996. This is a thorough examina- handbook for recruiting teachers, especially minorities,
tion of the need for a knowledge base in teaching, based with general information on the teaching profession and
on research and school reform issues. professional development.
National PTA. National Standards for Parent/Family Involve- Warner, Jack, and Clyde Bryan. The Unauthorized Teacher’s
ment. Chicago: National PTA, 1997. A comprehensive set Survival Guide. Indianapolis: Park Avenue, 1995. Must
of standards to help schools, families, and parent groups reading for all new teachers—a how-to-survive guide
work cooperatively to help children and effect educational that covers everything a young professional needs to
change. know from “soup to nuts.”
CHAPTER 4
Pioneers of Modern Teaching
92
Comenius: The Search for a New Method ■ 93
FOCUS QUESTIONS
■ Who qualifies as an educational pioneer? Can this pioneer contribute to
my ideas about teaching and learning?
■ How did the pioneers develop their ideas about education? Are there ele-
ments in their theories that I can use in constructing my own philosophy
of education?
■ How did they redefine knowledge, education, schooling, teaching,
and learning? Have their ideas caused me to redefine my ideas about
these areas?
■ Which ideas or practices from the pioneers are present in today’s teaching
and learning? Are these ideas present in preservice teacher preparation
and in classroom practice?
■ What contributions from the pioneers are useful to you in developing
your philosophy of education? How can I relate the pioneers to other
mentors—teachers, parents, and peers—who influenced my ideas about
what it means to be a teacher?
1For a biography of Comenius, see Daniel Murphy, Comenius: A Critical Reassessment of His
■ Learning language by Comenius was a transitional figure between the Renaissance humanist edu-
natural means cators discussed in the chapter on World Roots of American Education and later
naturalistic reformers. His emphasis on using the senses, rather than passive mem-
orization, to learn was followed by later educators such as Rousseau, Pestalozzi,
Montessori, and Dewey. His book, Gate of Tongues Unlocked, related Latin instruction
to the students’ own spoken vernacular language. Lessons began with short, simple
phrases and gradually moved to longer, more complex sentences. An innovative ed-
ucator, Comenius wrote one of the earliest picture books, The Visible World in Pic-
tures, as a teaching aid.3
3Fora brief biography, timeline, and excerpt from Comenius’s Great Didactic, see Madonna M.
Murphy, The History and Philosophy of Education: Voices of Educational Pioneers (Upper Saddle
River, N.J.: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall, 2006) , pp. 150–156.
Rousseau: Educating the Natural Person ■ 95
■ Principles of teaching Comenius emphasized the following principles that apply to the preservice
preparation of teachers and to classroom practice: (1) use objects or pictures to il-
lustrate concepts; (2) apply lessons to students’ practical lives; (3) present lessons di-
rectly and simply; (4) emphasize general principles before details; (5) emphasize
that all creatures and objects are part of a whole universe; (6) present lessons in se-
quence, stressing one thing at a time; (7) do not leave a specific subject until stu-
dents understand it completely.4 Comenius’s principles that emphasized children’s
readiness, using concrete objects, and moving gradually in instruction became an
integral part of teacher-education programs.
4
Gerald L. Gutek, Historical and Philosophical Foundations of Education: Selected Readings
(Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 2001), pp. 50–57.
5
For Rousseau’s autobiography, see Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Confessions, Patrick Coleman, ed.,
and Angela Scholar, trans. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000). For biographies, see
Maurice W. Cranston, Jean-Jacques: The Early Life and Work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau,
1712–1754 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991); and Maurice W. Cranston, The
Noble Savage: Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 1754–1762 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).
6
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991); see
also Daniel Cullen, Freedom in Rousseau’s Political Philosophy (DeKalb: Northern Illinois Uni-
versity Press, 1993).
96 ■ Chapter 4 Pioneers of Modern Teaching
OVERVIEW 4.1
Educational Pioneers
Pioneer Historical Context Purpose of Education Curriculum
Pestalozzi Early nineteenth century, Develop the human being’s Object lessons; form, number,
1746–1827 post-Napoleonic period and moral, mental, and physical sound
(Swiss) beginnings of industrialism powers harmoniously; use
sense perception in forming
clear ideas
Herbart Mid-nineteenth-century rise Develop many-sided interests Academic and humanistic
1776–1841 of philosophy and psychology and moral character studies, especially history
(German) in Europe and literature
Froebel Nineteenth-century resurgence Develop the latent spiritual Songs, stories, games, gifts,
1782–1852 of philosophical idealism and essence of the child in a occupations
(German) rise of nationalism prepared environment
Spencer Darwin’s theory of evolution in Enable human beings to live Practical, utilitarian, and
1820–1903 1859 and rise of nineteenth- effectively, economically, and scientific subjects
(English) century industrial corporations scientifically
Dewey Early–twentieth-century Contribute to the individual’s Making and doing; history
1859–1952 American progressive movement, personal, social, and intellectual and geography; science;
(American) growth of science, and rise of growth problems
pragmatic philosophy
Addams First half of twentieth century, Assimilate immigrants into Wide range of practical skills
1860–1935 period of massive immigration American society while for life in urban centers,
(American) and urban change preserving their ethnic cultural along with arts and sciences
heritages and problem solving
Montessori Late–nineteenth- and early- Assist children’s sensory, Motor and sensory skills;
1870–1952 twentieth-century assertion of muscular, and intellectual preplanned materials
(Italian) feminism; greater attention to development in a prepared
early childhood education environment
Piaget Twentieth-century developments Organize education in terms of Concrete and formal
1896–1980 in psychology by Freud, Hall, children’s patterns of growth operations
(Swiss) Jung, and others and development
Freire Late-twentieth-century critique Raise consciousness about Literary circles and critical
1921–1997 of neocolonialism and globalism exploitative conditions dialogues
(Brazilian)
Rousseau: Educating the Natural Person ■ 97
according to Rousseau, people were “noble savages,” innocent, free, and uncor-
rupted by socioeconomic artificialities. Rousseau is often criticized for his personal
inconsistency regarding children. Although he wrote about respecting children’s
freedom, he placed his own children in orphanages instead of rearing and educat-
ing them himself.
■ Emile: A novel of education Rousseau conveyed his educational philosophy in 1762 through his novel
Emile, the story of a boy’s education from infancy to adulthood.7 Attacking the child
depravity doctrine and book-dominated education, Rousseau argued that children’s
instincts and needs were naturally good and should be satisfied rather than re-
pressed by authoritarian schools and coercive teachers. He wanted people freed
from society’s imprisoning institutions, of which the school was one of the most
coercive.
Online Study Center After reading this section, watch “Elementary School Language Arts: Inquiry Learning.” This
video shows teacher Jenerra Williams structuring a lesson where children learn to
write sensory poems by reaching inside paper bags to encounter interesting objects
VIDEO CASE:
that they will then write about. As you’re watching the video, think of additional ways
Elementary School to use inquiry-based learning in the classroom and answer the following questions:
How does this video case illustrate Rousseau’s emphasis on learning through
Language Arts:
sensation?
Inquiry Learning Describe the “Rousseauean” teaching techniques that Ms. Williams uses within
this lesson.
**This Video Case reinforces key concepts found in Section II: Instruction and Assessment of the Praxis II
Exam.**
9
Eugene Iheoma, “Rousseau’s Views on Teaching,” Journal of Educational Thought 31 (April
1997), pp. 69–81.
CHAPTER 14
Curriculum and Instruction
413
414 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
FOCUS QUESTIONS
■ How does curriculum content reflect changes in society?
■ In what ways is curriculum organized?
■ How might the use of cooperative learning or mastery learning influence
your work as a teacher?
■ How can you use computers and other electronic resources in the class-
room to improve instruction?
■ What trends seem likely to affect curriculum and instruction in the
future?
Curriculum Organization
■ Subject matter versus We can view the various types of curriculum organization in American schools from
student needs two perspectives. One emphasizes the subject to be taught; the other emphasizes
■ Curriculum blends the student. The first perspective views curriculum as a body of content, or subject
matter, that leads to certain achievement outcomes or products. The second defines
curriculum in terms of student needs and attitudes; it is most concerned with
process—in other words, how the student learns and the classroom or school
climate. Few schools employ pure subject-centered (cognitive) or pure student-
centered (psychological) approaches in the teaching–learning process. You will find
that even though most teachers tend to emphasize one approach over the other,
they incorporate both choices in the classroom.
Subject-Centered Curricula
■ Organization by subjects Subject matter is both the oldest and most contemporary framework of curriculum
organization. It is also the most common—primarily because it is convenient, as
you can tell from the departmental structure of secondary schools and colleges.
Even in elementary schools, where self-contained classrooms force the teachers to
be generalists, curricula are usually organized by subjects.
■ Arguments pro and con Proponents of subject-centered curricula argue that subjects present a logical
basis for organizing and interpreting learning, that teachers are trained as subject
matter specialists, and that textbooks and other teaching materials are usually orga-
nized by subject. Critics claim that subject-centered curricula often are a mass of
facts and concepts learned in isolation. They see this kind of curriculum as deem-
phasizing life experiences and failing to consider the needs and interests of stu-
dents. In subject-centered curricula, the critics argue, the teacher dominates the
lesson, allowing little student input.
The following sections discuss several variations of subject-centered approaches
to curricula, such as the subject-area approach, back-to-basics, and the core curricu-
lum. These represent neither the only possible variations nor hard-and-fast cate-
gories. Many schools and teachers mix these approaches, drawing from more than
one of them.
Curriculum Organization ■ 415
■ Drawing on the classical Subject-Area Approach to Curriculum The subject-area approach is the most widely
tradition used form of curriculum organization. This long-standing approach has its roots in
the seven liberal arts of classical Greece and Rome: grammar, rhetoric, dialectic,
arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, and music. Modern subject-area curricula trace
their origins to the work of William Harris, superintendent of the St. Louis school
system in the 1870s. Steeped in the classical tradition, Harris established a subject
orientation that has virtually dominated U.S. curricula from his day to the present.
For example, consider Table 14.1, which shows the recommendations of the Com-
mittee of Fifteen in 1895. Although the committee’s proposal is more than a century
old, the subject categories are quite recognizable. As a student, you were most likely
introduced to “algebra” and “English grammar,” “reading” and “writing,” as well as
“geography” and “history.”
■ Categories of subjects The modern subject-area curriculum treats each subject as a specialized and
largely autonomous body of knowledge. Subjects referred to as the “basics” are
considered essential for all students; these usually include the three Rs at the elemen-
tary level and English, history, science, and mathematics at the secondary level.
Other specialized subjects develop knowledge and skills for particular vocations or
professions—for example, business mathematics and physics. Finally, elective content
affords the student optional offerings, often tailored to student interests and needs.
■ Exploratory subjects A newer term, exploratory subjects, refers to subjects that students may choose
from a list of courses designed to suit a wide range of learning styles, needs, and in-
terests. These courses, which can include such subjects as study skills, computer sci-
ence, creative writing, and drama, allow the school to diversify its offerings. They
appear most often in middle school and late elementary-school curricula.2 Schools
that include exploratory subjects in the curriculum tend to be more progressive in
outlook than schools that still favor the traditional core academic subjects.
■ Perennialism: the best of Perennialist and Essentialist Approaches to Curriculum Two of the educational
the past theories described in the chapter on Philosophical Roots of Education are funda-
mentally subject centered: perennialism and essentialism.3 Believing that the main
purpose of education is the cultivation of the intellect and of certain timeless values
concerning work, morality, and family living, the perennialists concentrate their
curriculum on the three Rs, Latin, and logic at the elementary level, adding study of
the classics at the secondary level. The assumption of the perennialist approach to
curriculum, according to Robert Hutchins, is that the best of the past—the so-called
permanent studies, or classics—remains equally valid for the present.4
■ Essentialism: major Essentialists believe that the elementary curriculum should consist of the three
disciplines, cultural literacy Rs, and the high-school curriculum of five or six major disciplines: English (grammar,
literature, and writing), mathematics, the sciences, history, foreign languages, and
2Allan C. Ornstein, Middle and Secondary School Methods (New York: Harper and Row, 1992);
Ed Brazee, “Exploratory Curriculum in the Middle School” (December 2000), ERIC Clearing-
house on Elementary and Early Childhood Education at http://ericeece.org/pubs/digests/
2000/brazee00.html; and Sara deFreitas and Martin Oliver, “How Can Exploratory Learning
with Games and Simulations Within the Curriculum Be Most Effectively Evaluated?”
Computers and Education (April 2006), pp. 249–262.
3
Theodore Brameld coined these two terms in Patterns of Educational Philosophy (New York:
Holt, 1950).
4
Robert M. Hutchins, The Higher Learning in America (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University
Press, 1936). See also Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind (New York: Simon and
Schuster, 1987); E. D. Hirsch, Cultural Literacy: Rediscovering Knowledge in American Education
(Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987); and John Kornfeld. “Framing the Conversations: Social
Studies and the Neoconservative Agenda,” Social Studies (August 2005), p. 143.
416 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
Table 14.1 The Elementary-School Curriculum Proposed by the Committee of Fifteen in 1895
Reading 10 lessons
5 lessons a week
a week
Writing 10 lessons 5 lessons 3 lessons
a week a week a week
Spelling lists 4 lessons a week
English grammar 5 lessons a week
Oral with composition lessons
with textbook
Latin 5 lessons
a week
Arithmetic Oral, 60 minutes 5 lessons a week with
a week textbook
Algebra 5 lessons a week
Geography Oral, 60 minutes 5 lessons a week with
3 lessons a week
a week textbook
Natural science
60 minutes a week
and hygiene
U.S. history 5 lessons
a week
U.S. Constitution *5 lessons
a week
General history Oral, 60 minutes a week
Physical culture 60 minutes a week
Vocal music 60 minutes a week divided into 4 lessons
Drawing 60 minutes a week
Manual training or
One-half day each
sewing and cooking
Total hours of
recitation 12 12 11 13 161⁄4 161⁄4 171⁄2 171⁄2
(reciting/answering
questions
Questions
1. If your major is early childhood or elementary education, study the Committee of Fifteen’s proposals for grades 1–5. How
do the suggested subjects and their treatment compare with curriculum treatment you believe students should receive
today? List specific additions and deletions.
2. If your major is secondary education, do the same as in question 1 for grades 6, 7, and 8. How do the committee’s sug-
gested subjects and treatment compare with the curriculum treatment you feel students should receive today? List
specific additions and deletions.
3. Which theories of education described in the chapter on Philosophical Roots of Education best fit the Committee of
Fifteen’s proposals? What evidence in Table 14.1 supports your choice of theories?
5For classic statements of this approach, see Arthur Bestor, The Restoration of Learning (New
York: Knopf, 1956); and James B. Conant, The American High School Today (New York:
McGraw-Hill, 1959).
6See, for example, E. D. Hirsch, “The Core Knowledge Curriculum—What’s Behind Its Suc-
cess?” Educational Leadership (May 1993), pp. 23–25, 27–30; Norman Bauer, Essential Schools
and the Basics; Resisting Technocratic Rationality, 1993 (ERIC Document No. 356560); Michael
E. Wonacett, “Postmodernism: Yes, No or Maybe? Myths and Realities” (Washington, D.C.:
U.S. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 2001).
7
See the annual Gallup Polls published in the September or October issues of Phi Delta Kap-
pan, 1976 to 2006.
8David W. Jardina, “Back to Basics: Rethinking What Is Basic to Education,” Alberta Journal
of Educational Research (Summer 2001), pp. 187–190; Elliot W. Eisner, “What Really Counts in
School,” Educational Leadership (February 1991), pp. 10–17; and Mary Anna Dunn, “Staying
the Course of Open Education,” Educational Leadership (April 2000), pp. 20–24.
9Allan C. Ornstein, “National Reform and Instructional Accountability,” High School Journal
(October–November 1990), pp. 51–56; Massachusetts Board of Education, The State of Public
Education: Massachusetts Board of Education 2004, Annual Report (Malden, Mass.: Mass. Depart-
ment of Education, 2005); and Brenda Welburn, “Executive Summary,” State Education Stan-
dard (Spring 2000), p. 5.
418 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
TAKING ISSUE
State Competency Tests for Students
One feature of the back-to-basics movement has been a rise in statewide testing of students.The failure of many students
to master even the most basic skills, especially in reading, writing, mathematics, and history, has prompted state, and even
federal, lawmakers to demand proof that schools are meeting minimum standards. As a teacher, you will almost certainly
be involved in statewide testing of your students. All states now employ statewide testing at one or more stages in the
educational process. Many states, in fact, have established minimum competency tests that students must pass before
graduating from high school.
Question
Should every state require students to pass a statewide competency test to receive a high-school diploma?
(for example, math and science, or English and social studies). The teacher or-
ganizes instructional units in an interdisciplinary manner, showing how diverse
subjects relate to one another.10 This approach, sometimes called block scheduling
(a block of time for math and a block for science), is tied to a progressive theory of
education.
■ The new core curriculum The second approach, in contrast, was born out of the 1980s educational re-
form movement and reflects the more conservative theory of essentialism. In this
version, which we will call the new core curriculum (core subjects approach), stu-
dents experience a common body of required subjects—subjects that advocates con-
sider central to the education of all students.11 Mortimer Adler is best known for
popularizing this new core curriculum idea at the elementary-school level. Ernest
Boyer, John Goodlad, and Theodore Sizer are best known for their similar influence
on high schools.12
■ Expanding the core units Both Boyer and Sizer emphasize the humanities, communication and language
skills, science, math, and technology. Boyer believes that the core units required for
graduation should be expanded from one-half of the total curriculum (now the
norm) to about two-thirds. Goodlad would like to see about 80 percent of the cur-
riculum devoted to core courses, with only 20 percent reserved for the development
of individual talents and interests.13
■ Stiffer requirements The proponents of a new core curriculum have helped make subject-matter re-
quirement changes in districts nationwide that you may have noticed as a stu-
dent.14 Those changes are summarized in Figure 14.1. In the decades after 1982, the
percentage of high-school graduates who completed a basic curriculum in core sub-
jects increased from 14 percent to more than 44 percent.15
■ Critiques of new core The new core curriculum approach has drawn criticisms similar to those aimed
curriculum at the back-to-basics curriculum. It may be argued that the new core curriculum
turns the clock back to 1900, when subject-matter emphasis and academic rigor
were the order of the day. These days, more students are college bound, and for
them the academic core courses may be appropriate; yet increasing numbers of stu-
dents are graduating from our schools as functional illiterates. To have value for
all students, a core curriculum should take into account diverse populations of
students, their individual differences, and their career/job preferences.
10
Allan C. Ornstein and Francis Hunkins, Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Theory, 2nd
ed. (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998), pp. 160–161; Thomas Fowler-Finn, “I Think, I Can,”
American School Board Journal (October 2000), pp. 36–39; and E. D. Hirsch, “Not So Grand a
Strategy,” Education Next (Spring 2003), pp. 68–72.
11
Richard W. Riley, “World Class Standards: The Key to Educational Reform” (Washington,
D.C.: Department of Education, 1993); and John I. Goodlad, “A New Look at an Old Idea:
Core Curriculum,” Educational Leadership (December 1986–January 1987), pp. 8–16.
12
Ernest L. Boyer, High School (New York: Harper and Row, 1983); Theodore R. Sizer, Horace’s
Compromise: The Dilemma of the American High School, rev. ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin,
1985); and Joseph Creech, High School Graduation Standards: What We Expect and What We
Get (Atlanta: Southern Regional Educational Board, 1996).
13
Boyer, High School; Sizer, Horace’s Compromise; John I. Goodlad, A Place Called School (New
York: McGraw-Hill, 1984); Ernest L. Boyer, The Basic School: A Community of Learning (Prince-
ton: Carnegie Foundation, 1995); and Thomas Rodgers, “History, Self-Awareness and the
Core Curriculum,” Journal of General Education (2004), pp. 41–57.
14
Digest of Education Statistics, 2002 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office,
2002), Table 142.
15
“By the Numbers—Key Subjects,” Education Week, June 14, 1995, p. 4; and Digest of Educa-
tion Statistics, 2000, Table 141.
420 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
COURSEWORK R EQUIRED
AVERAGE HOURS OF
3
0
1982 2002 1982 2002 1982 2002 1982 2002
MATHEMATICS SCIENCE ENGLISH SOCIAL STUDIES
Source: The Condition of Education 1987 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987),
Table 1.37B, p. 84; and Digest of Education Statistics, 2002 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 2000),Table 139.
Student-Centered Curricula
■ Emphasizing student needs In direct contrast to subject-centered curricula, student-centered curricula of var-
ious types emphasize student interests and needs, including the affective aspects of
learning. At its extreme, the student-centered approach is rooted in the philosophy
of Jean Jacques Rousseau, who encouraged childhood self-expression. Implicit in
Rousseau’s philosophy is the necessity of leaving the children to their own devices,
allowing them the creativity and freedom essential for growth.
■ Influence of progressivism Progressive education gave impetus to student-centered curricula. Progressive
educators believed that when the interests and needs of learners were incorporated
into the curriculum, students would be intrinsically motivated and learning would
be more successful. This does not mean that students’ whims or passing fads should
dictate the curriculum. However, one criticism of student-centered curricula is that
they sometimes overlook important cognitive content.
■ Dewey’s call for balance John Dewey, a chief advocate of student-centered curricula, attempted to estab-
lish a curriculum that balanced subject matter with student interests and needs. As
early as 1902, he pointed out the fallacies of either extreme. The learner was neither
“a docile recipient of facts” nor “the starting point, the center, and the end” of
school activity.16 Dewey tried to emphasize the need for balance.
There are at least five major approaches to organizing student-centered curric-
ula: activity-centered approaches, relevant curriculum, the humanistic approach, al-
ternative or free schools, and values-centered curricula.
16
John Dewey, The Child and the Curriculum (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1902),
pp. 8–9; George Debore, “Student-Centered Teaching in a Standards-Based World: Finding a
Sensible Balance,” Science and Education (July 2002), pp. 405–417; Violet R. Harade, “Building
a Learning Community: Students and Adults as Inquirers,” Childhood Education (Winter
2002–2003), pp. 66–71; and William J. Reese, “The Origins of Progressive Education,” History
of Education Quarterly (Spring 2001), pp. 1–24.
Curriculum Organization ■ 421
■ Lifelike, purposeful activities Activity-Centered Approaches The movement for an activity-centered curricu-
lum has strongly affected the public elementary schools. William Kilpatrick, one of
Dewey’s colleagues, was an early leader. In contrast to Dewey, Kilpatrick believed
that teachers could not anticipate the interests and needs of children, which made
any preplanned curriculum impossible. Thus he attacked the typical school curricu-
lum as unrelated to the problems of real life. Instead, he advocated purposeful ac-
tivities as relevant and lifelike as possible and tied to a student’s needs and
interests,17 such as group games, dramatizations, story projects, field trips, social en-
terprises, and interest centers. All of these facets of the activity-centered curriculum
involved problem solving and active student participation. They also emphasized
socialization and the formation of stronger school–community ties. Thus, they have
relevance even today.
■ Constructivism The recent development of constructivist learning theory, described in the chapter
on Philosophical Roots of Education, draws on these and similar concepts. Con-
structivists favor an activity-centered curriculum in which students actively (men-
tally and physically) interact with knowledge and each other to construct meaning
and new knowledge for themselves.18
Relevant Curriculum By the 1930s, some reformers complained that the tradi-
tional school curriculum had become irrelevant: it had failed to adjust to social
change and therefore emphasized skills and knowledge not pertinent to modern so-
ciety. The 1960s and 1970s saw a renewed concern for a relevant curriculum, but
with a somewhat different emphasis. Critics expressed less concern that the cur-
riculum reflect changing social conditions and more concern that the curriculum be
relevant to the students’ personal needs and interests.
■ Requirements for a relevant Proponents of this approach today suggest that educators (1) individualize in-
curriculum struction through such teaching methods as independent inquiry and special proj-
ects; (2) revise existing courses and develop new courses on such topics of student
concern as environmental protection, drug addiction, urban problems, and cultural
pluralism; (3) provide educational alternatives (such as electives, minicourses, and
open classrooms) that allow more freedom of choice; and (4) extend the curriculum
beyond the school’s walls, through such means as distance learning (described in
more detail later in this chapter) and field trips.19
■ Psychological foundation Humanistic Approach to Curriculum A humanistic approach to curriculum em-
■ Higher domains of phasizes affective, attitudinal or emotional, in addition to cognitive outcomes. Such
consciousness a curriculum draws heavily on the work of psychologists Abraham Maslow and Carl
Rogers.20 Advocates of humanistic education contend that the present school cur-
riculum has failed miserably, that teachers and schools are determined to stress
17
William H. Kilpatrick, “The Project Method,” Teachers College Record (September 1918),
pp. 319–335.
18Lois T. Stover, Gloria A. Neubert, and James C. Lawlor, Creating Interactive Environments in
the Secondary School (Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1993), pp. 20–23;
Ina Claire Gabler, Constructivist Methods for the Secondary Classroom: Engaged Minds (ED
471198); James P. Comer, “Child and Adolescent Development: The Critical Missing Compo-
nent in School Reform,” Phi Delta Kappan (June 2005), pp. 357–363; and James H. Van Sciver,
“Motherhod, Apple Pie and Differentiated Instruction,” Phi Delta Kappan (March 2005),
pp. 534–535.
19Velma Menchase, “Providing a Culturally Relevant Curriculum for Hispanic Children,”
Multicultural Education (Spring 2001), pp. 18–20; Michael W. Apple and Linda Christian-
Smith, The Politics of the Textbook (New York: Routledge, 1991); and Arthur Powell, Eleanor
Farrar, and David Cohen, The Shopping Mall High School (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1985).
20Abraham H. Maslow, Toward a Psychology of Being (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold,
1962); Abraham H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality, 2nd ed. (New York: Harper and Row,
1970); and Carl Rogers, Freedom to Learn, 2nd ed. (Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1983).
422 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
cognitive behaviors and to control students not for students’ good but for the good
of adults. Humanists emphasize more than affective processes; they seek higher do-
mains of spirit, consciousness, aesthetics, and morality.21 They stress more mean-
ingful relationships between students and teachers; student independence and
self-direction; and greater acceptance of self and others. Your role in teaching from
a humanist approach would be to help learners cope with their psychological needs
and problems and to facilitate self-understanding among students.
■ Freedom for students Alternative or Free Schools Programs Today, you are likely to find student-centered
curriculum programs in alternative or free schools, often private or experimental
institutions, some organized by parents and teachers dissatisfied with the public
schools. These schools typically feature much student freedom, noisy classrooms,
and a learning environment, often unstructured, where students are free to explore
their interests. Most are considered radical and antiestablishment, even though
many of their ideas are rooted in the well-known student-centered doctrines of
progressivism.
■ Controversy about free Paul Freire, Henry Giroux, Ivan Illich, Herbert Kohl, and Jonathan Kozol have
schools stressed the need for, and in many cases have established, student-centered alterna-
tive or free schools.22 Critics, however, condemn these schools as places where little
cognitive learning takes place and that provide little discipline and order. Pro-
ponents counter that children do learn in student-centered alternative schools,
which—instead of stressing conformity—are made to fit the students.
■ Public alternative schools A second type of alternative school is that which public-school systems run for
■ Restructuring students who experience persistent discipline problems (and who often also have
learning problems). These schools start from the premise that schools must change
to provide a more flexible approach to learning. They generally stress greater
collaboration among staff members and between staff and students in terms of both
curriculum and instructional methods. Many schools that have developed highly
creative approaches are among the best examples of restructured schools in the
country—that is, schools reorganized around improved student achievement, effec-
tive teaching, and improved school organization.23 (See the chapter on School
Effectiveness and Reform in the United States for further discussion of restructuring.)
■ Value confusion Values-Centered Curriculum A values-centered curriculum—more popularly
■ Multiculturalism and values known as character education—places special emphasis on moral and ethical issues.
For example, advocates of multicultural education stress not only knowledge of
■ Sense of right and wrong
American society’s diverse cultures and ethnic experiences, but also appreciation
and respect for cultures other than one’s own. Thus, multicultural education fits
21Elliot Eisner, The Educational Imagination, 3rd ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1993); John Miller,
The Holistic Curriculum: Revised and Expanded Edition (Ontario: OISE Press, 1996); and Carol
Witherell and Nel Noddings, The Challenge to Care in Schools (New York: Teachers College
Press, 1992). See Paul Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed (New York: Herder and Herder, 1970);
Henry A. Giroux, Teachers as Intellectuals (Granby, Mass.: Bergin and Garvey, 1988); Ivan
Illich, Deschooling Society (New York: Harper and Row, 1971); Jonathan Kozol, Free Schools
(Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972); Jonathan Kozol, Savage Inequalities: Children in America’s
Schools (New York: Crown, 1991); and Jonathan Kozol, “The Shame of the Nation,” Phi Delta
Kappan (December 2005), pp. 265–275.
22See, for instance, Diane Ravitch, The Troubled Crusade (New York: Basic Books, 1983); and
M. Willemse et al., “Values in Education: A Challlenge for Teacher Educators,” Teaching and
Teacher Educators (February 2005); Camilla A. Lehr, “Alternative Schools Serving Teachers
With and Without Disabilities: What Are the Current Issues and Challenges?” Preventing
School Failure (Winter 2003), pp. 59–65; and Ron Miller, “John Holt: His Prophetic Voice,”
Education Revolution (Autumn 2002), pp. 28–33.
23Robin Ann Martin, Alternatives in Education: An Exploration of Learner-Centered Progressive
and Holistic Education, 2002 (ED 466453); Andy Samarick, “A Chance for School Reform,”
The Sunday Sun, March 27, 2006, p. 19A.
Curriculum Organization ■ 423
S
andra Helenski, Bobby Owens, and Laura Rittilini are responds Sandra.“For example, why can’t students learn to
new to Winkler Junior High and the teaching profes- search for and evaluate authors’ statements about honesty
sion. All are assigned to teach seventh-grade students. just as easily as they can learn to search for and evaluate
Sandra teaches English, Bobby teaches life science, and metaphors?”
Laura teaches band. All would say they teach students first “I’m including some activities that emphasize respect
and the subject second. for the environment,” said Bobby.“Students will test water
Discussion in the teachers’ lounge is warming up today and take air samples near the county landfill.They’ll analyze
as they debate a few of their concerns with the most expe- their lab results in teams and send reports to the county
rienced teachers at Winkler. commissioners. Certainly we can include values with this
Mrs.Whipper, one of the veterans in the profession, says, approach.” He turned to the veterans.“What do you think?”
“I don’t see how you can teach values if you want them to A more experienced teacher responded, “Well, I would
pass the state exam next March. You have to stay focused be sure that my time was wisely used. That sort of ac-
on the basics—the test content. If you want to last a few tivity can get away from you, and before you know it,
years here, I think you should stick to making sure your stu- March is here and your students aren’t ready for the state
dents can write correctly and read well. Also, you have to be exam. So, just be careful in how you plan and implement
very careful: Are you sure you know the values of the com- your ideas.”
munity or of the parents? If you teach tolerance of diversity Laura chimed in with her observation that the skills,
that includes gays and lesbians, many conservative reli- knowledge, and dispositions of each band member were
gious parents won’t be happy. It’s all too easy to be misun- important to her. She wanted to be sure that each student
derstood and to step on someone’s toes.” valued being part of a team and also valued the discipline
“But, when I have a perfectly good opportunity to use and hard work it took from all members to form a champi-
student needs and interests in teaching concepts in the onship band. “Certainly,” she said, “each of us in our own
state curricula that relate to values, perhaps through spe- way is teaching values anyway. Perhaps we need to reflect
cial projects or book assignments, why shouldn’t I do that?” on what values we teach just doing everyday things.”
Questions
1. What do all three new teachers hold in common? What kinds of curriculum organization are really under discus-
sion here?
2. How do you react to the experienced teachers’ comments to Sandra? How would you reply?
3. What curriculum approach do you favor? Why?
4. Do you agree with Laura’s comment that all teachers teach values? How do you expect the experienced teachers to
react to Laura’s comment?
24
See, for example, Task Force on Values Education and Ethical Behavior, How to Establish a
Values Education Program in Your School (Towson, Md.: Baltimore County Public Schools,
1991); Linda Inlay, “Values: The Implicit Curriculum,” Educational Leadership (March 2003),
pp. 69–71; and Sara Efron and Pamela Joseph, “Seven Worlds of Moral Education,” Phi Delta
Kappan (March 2005), pp. 525–533.
424 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
■ No quick fix Kevin Ryan, director of the Center for the Advancement of Ethics and Charac-
ter, says that the school curriculum, now increasingly devoid of moral authority and
ethical language, has become sterile and meaningless. Ryan warns, however, that
character education requires more than a quick-fix approach. Educators and their
communities must define character education clearly and make it a focal point of
the school’s mission, finding a common ground of civic values that do not trans-
gress upon religious and family values.25
■ What values should we One potential drawback to values-centered curricula, like humanistic curricula,
teach? is a lack of attention to cognitive learning. Even more important, educators and
community members rarely concur about which values to teach or how to teach
them. In such controversial areas as sex, religion, and social justice, values educa-
tion may become a minefield. From Preservice to Practice illustrates educators’ con-
cerns about including values in the curriculum.
■ Finding a consensus Despite these problems, many educators contend that it is possible—even with
our multicultural, multireligious population—to establish a set of values that repre-
sent an American consensus.26 Table 14.2, for example, lists a “common core of val-
ues” developed by the school system in Baltimore County, Maryland. These values
are emphasized throughout the curriculum, especially in social studies and English.
Although the exact definitions of concepts such as “freedoms,” “patriotism,” and
“tolerance” may be hard to determine, many educators believe that finding such a
common core is an urgent responsibility of American schools.
Source: Task Force on Values Education and Ethical Behavior, 1984 and Beyond: A Reaffirmation of Values
(Towson, Md.: Baltimore County Public Schools, 1994).
25Tom Erb, “Nurturing Good People: The Editor Reflects,” Middle School Journal (Sep-
tember 2002), pp. 1–4; Linda Darling, “The Essential Moral Dimensions of Citizenship
Education: What Should We Teach?” Journal of Educational Thought (December 2002),
pp. 229–247; and Kevin Ryan, “Character and Coffee Mugs,” Education Week, May 17,
1995, pp. 37, 48.
26Ibid., pp. 37, 48; Kenneth Godwin, Carrie Ausbrooks, and Valerie Martinez, “Teaching
Tolerance in Public and Private Schools,” Phi Delta Kappan (March 2001), pp. 542–546; and
Thomas Lasley, “The Missing Ingredient in Character Education,” Phi Delta Kappan (April
1997), pp. 654–655.
Curriculum Organization ■ 425
OVERVIEW 14.1
Curriculum Organization Approaches
Corresponding
Curriculum Approach Philosophy or Theory Content Emphasis Instructional Emphasis
Subject-Centered
Subject-area Perennialism, essentialism Three Rs; academic, Knowledge, concepts,
vocational, and elective and principles; specialized
subjects knowledge
Perennialist Perennialism Three Rs; liberal arts; Rote memorization;
classics; timeless values; specialized knowledge;
academic rigor mental discipline
Essentialist Essentialism Three Rs; liberal arts Concepts and principles;
and science; academic problem solving; essential
disciplines; academic skills
excellence
Back-to-basics Essentialism Three Rs; academic Specific knowledge and
subjects skills; drill; attainment of
measurable ends or
competencies
New core curriculum Perennialism, essentialism Common curriculum for Common knowledge;
(core subjects) all students; focus on intellectual skills and
academics concepts; values and moral
issues
Student-Centered
Activity-centered Progressivism Student needs and Active, experimental
interests; student activities; environment; project
school–community methods; effective living
activities
Relevant Progressivism, social Student experiences and Social and personal problems;
reconstructionism activities; felt needs reflective thinking
Humanistic Progressivism, social Introspection; choice; Individual and group learning;
reconstructionism, affective processes flexible, artistic, psychological
existentialism methods; self-realization
Alternative or free schools Progressivism Student needs and Play oriented; creative
interests; student expression; free learning
experiences environment
Values-centered (character Social reconstructionism, Democratic values; ethical Feelings, attitudes, and
education) existentialism and moral values; cross- emotions; existentialist
cultural and universal thinking; decision making
values; choice and freedom
426 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
TECHNOLOGY @ SCHOOL
Protecting Students from Undesirable Material on the Web
E
ducators and parents alike agree that adult supervision awareness.ca/english/resources/special_initiatives/wa_
of students’ website selections, both at home and at resources/wa_shared/backgrounders/tracking_kids_on
school (a form of censorship), is critical. As a teacher, line.cfm.)
you need to educate your students about responsible online If you find that students are distracted by visiting irrele-
behavior and safety issues. An excellent website for this is vant or inappropriate websites at school, you can use tech-
Media Awareness Network at www.media-awareness.ca/ nology to limit their choices. Web Whacker, a commercial
english/teachers/wa_teachers/index.cfm; scroll down to program, lets you download websites to your class com-
“Web Awareness for Teachers,” then click on “Safe Passage.” puters and use the sites without an Internet connection
This site alerts teachers and students to safety issues associ- (see www.bluesquirrel.com/). Because the computers are
ated with websites,chat rooms,newsgroups,instant messag- not actually connected to the Internet, this program per-
ing, and e-mail. It includes information on the benefits and mits 100 percent control over Web content viewed by
risks of these activities and offers practical advice on how children.
you can ensure that your students have safe and rewarding Another excellent tool for teachers is the EduHound
experiences. The site also includes a button for parents with HotList, which permits teachers (and parents) to create
much the same information; see “Parental Involvement” and their own Web page of educational resources composed of
“Be Web Aware.” educational links, questions, directions, explanations, and
In addition to informing students about Internet safety, assignments. HotLists are password protected to ensure
media awareness groups suggest other measures to en- privacy and security, and a teacher can develop, free of
sure that students avoid exposure to inappropriate mater- charge, as many HotLists as he or she wishes (see www
ial online.To begin with, ask your students to sign contracts .eduhound.com/hotlist/).
regarding appropriate Internet behavior. You should also The approaches suggested above help teachers and
occasionally monitor the sites they visit. The Media Aware- parents ensure that their children spend productive learn-
ness Network suggests easy ways to find out what websites ing time on the Internet, avoid inappropriate and undesir-
your students have visited in an article called “Tracking able material, and remain safe from those who would prey
Where Kids Have Been Online.” (See www.media- on children.
■ Limitations of textbooks
Standards & Assessment ✓
■ ■ Advantages of textbooks
■ Censorship trends
■ Subtle censorship
27AllanC. Ornstein, “Textbook Instruction: Processes and Strategies,” NASSP Bulletin (Decem-
ber 1989), pp. 105–111; Jess E. House “Leverage on Learning: Test Scores, Textbooks and
Publishers,” Phi Delta Kappan (March 2003), pp. 537–541; William Evers, “The Least Com-
mon Denominator,” Education Next (Spring 2003), pp. 73–75; and Patrick F. Burnett, “Re-
engineering Schools for the 21st Century,” Phi Delta Kappan (September 2005), pp. 76–78, 83.
428 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
data, they may become superficial and discourage conceptual thinking, critical
analysis, and evaluation. Furthermore, with the possible exception of mathematics
Standards & Assessment ✓
■ textbooks, most quickly become outdated. Because they are expensive, however,
they often are used long after they should have been replaced.
■ Advantages of textbooks Considering these criticisms, why do teachers rely so heavily on textbooks? The
answer is that textbooks also have many advantages. A textbook provides teachers
with an outline for planning lessons; summarizes a great deal of pertinent informa-
tion; enables the student to take home most of the course material in a convenient
package; provides a common resource for all students to follow; includes pictures,
graphs, maps, and other illustrative material that facilitate understanding; and fre-
quently includes other teaching aids, such as summaries and review questions.28
Furthermore, textbook authors and publishers are increasing efforts to create mate-
rials that help teachers reach state standards. In short, the textbook is an acceptable
tool if selected and used properly. However, it should not be the only source of
knowledge for students, and it should not define the entire curriculum.
■ Censorship trends Another issue in curriculum development is the question of censorship. In
states that prepare lists of instructional materials for their schools, the trend is grow-
ing to “limit what students shall read.” As the chapter on Governing and Adminis-
tering Public Education indicated, the list of objectionable works has sometimes
included such classics as Little Red Riding Hood and Huckleberry Finn. Today, almost
any instructional material that contains political or economic messages, obscenity,
sex, nudity, profanity, slang or questionable English, ethnic or racially sensitive ma-
terial, or any material that could be interpreted as antifamily, antireligious, or anti-
American is subject to possible censorship. Additionally, the use of commercial
videos and unsupervised Internet access, as discussed in the Technology @ School
box, is of much concern to teachers and parents.29
■ Subtle censorship Although censorship is often overt, it can operate in subtle ways as well. Cur-
riculum developers may quietly steer away from issues and materials that would
cause controversy in the community. Moreover, textbooks often omit topics that
might upset potential audiences or interest groups. Even pictures are important;
some organizations count the number of pictures of one ethnic group versus an-
other group, of boys versus girls, of business versus labor. Professional associations
can also exert a type of censorship when they recommend certain changes in sub-
ject content and implicitly discourage other approaches. Educators must be sensi-
tive to censorship because it is always present in one form or another. In dealing
with such issues, we often find that Herbert Spencer’s fundamental question “What
knowledge is of most worth?” becomes “Whose knowledge is of most worth?”30
As teaching becomes more professionalized, teachers are increasingly expected
to deal with curriculum choices and the complex issues they present. To avoid letting
28
Allan C. Ornstein, “The Textbook-Driven Curriculum,” Peabody Journal of Education (Spring
1994), pp. 70–85; search at www.rethinkingschools.org/ for “Reading, Writing and Censor-
ship” by Barbara Miner; and Mitzi Lewison et al., “Dangerous Discourses: Using Controver-
sial Books to Support Engagement, Diversity and Democracy,” New Advocate (Summer 2002),
pp. 215–226.
29
Steven C. Schlozman, “To View or Not to View,” Educational Leadership (December 2002),
pp. 87–88; and Jerry M. Weiss, “Rumbles, Bangs, Crashes! The Roar of Censorship,” ALAN
Review (Spring–Summer 2002), pp. 54–57. See also “Censorship and Challenges,” American
Library Association, January 29, 2001, at www.ala.org/alaorg/oif/censors.html.
30
Joan Del Fattore, What Johnny Shouldn’t Read: Textbook Censorship in America (New Haven:
Yale University Press, 1992); and Margaret Crocce, “Dealing with Difference in the Social
Studies: An Historical Perspective,” International Journal of Social Education (Fall/Winter
2003–2004), pp. 106–120.
Instructional Approaches ■ 429
Instructional Approaches
■ Interrelationship of Although educators differ in the definition of curriculum, most recognize that cur-
curriculum and instruction riculum and instruction are interrelated. To carry out the curriculum, one must rely
on instruction—programs, materials, and methods. Even more than with curricu-
lum approaches, most teachers incorporate a variety of instructional strategies in
their classes. The search for new programs and methods of instruction is continual.
The past four decades, in particular, have witnessed a major effort to improve learn-
ing outcomes, integrate technology into the lesson, and have students participate
firsthand with the new tools of instruction.
Although we cannot survey all the major instructional innovations, the follow-
ing sections describe several that have drawn considerable attention from edu-
cators. The chapter on School Effectiveness and Reform in the United States treats
the subject of instructional approaches in the context of school reform and school
effectiveness.
Individualized Instruction
In recent decades, several models have been advanced for individualized instruc-
tion. Although these approaches vary, they all try to provide a one-to-one student–
teacher or student–computer relationship. Students proceed at their own rate with
carefully sequenced and structured instructional materials, and usually with an em-
phasis on practice and drill.
■ IPI One of the early examples, the Individually Prescribed Instruction (IPI) project,
was developed at the University of Pittsburgh in the late 1950s and early 1960s.32
Teachers prepared an individual plan for every student, based on a diagnosis of the
student’s needs in each skill or subject. Students worked toward specific proficiency
levels. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms. Teachers gave students individu-
alized learning tasks and continually evaluated their progress.
■ Significant gains reported Field testing of individualized instruction programs has generally been positive.
Reports on IPI and other approaches have shown significant gains in student
achievement. Adaptive instruction, adjusted to students’ individual strengths and
weaknesses, seems to benefit all kinds of students, especially low-achieving ones or
students with mild disabilities.33 Nevertheless, most schools today continue to em-
ploy group methods of instruction and group expectations. Schools often consider
31
Michael Apple, “Is There a Curriculum Voice to Reclaim?” Phi Delta Kappan (March 1990),
pp. 526–530; and Robert Seney, “The Challenge of ‘Challenged’ Books,” Gifted Child Today
(Spring 2002), pp. 28–32.
32Robert Glaser and Lauren B. Resnick, “Instructional Psychology,” Annual Review of Psychol-
2000), pp. 20–24; Belinda Tetteris. The Nitty-Gritty Classroom and Behavior Management Re-
source (Ridge Summit, Pa: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006); Laura M. Stough, “Special Thinking
in Special Settings: A Qualitative Study of Expert Educators,” Journal of Special Education
(Winter 2003), pp. 206–222; and Jillian Leaderhouse, “The Power of One-on-One,” Educa-
tional Leadership (April 2003), pp. 69–71.
430 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
Cooperative Learning
■ Competition versus Cooperative rather than competitive learning is also gaining acceptance as an im-
cooperation portant way to instruct students. In the traditional classroom structure, students
compete for teacher recognition and grades. The same students tend to be “win-
ners” and “losers” over the years because of differences in ability and achievement.
High-achieving students continually receive rewards and are motivated to learn,
whereas low-achieving students continually experience failure (or near failure) and
frustration. The idea of cooperative learning is to change the traditional structure
by reducing competition and increasing cooperation among students, thus dimin-
ishing possible hostility and tension among students and raising the academic
achievement of all.
■ Benefits of competition This does not mean that competition has no place in the classroom or school.
Under the right conditions, competition can be a source of fun, excitement, and
motivation. The chief advocates of cooperation tell us that competition can be used
Instructional Approaches ■ 431
Online Study Center Watch “Cooperative Learning in the Elementary Grades: Jigsaw Model.” In this video clip,
the veteran teacher uses the Jigsaw Model as a cooperative learning strategy to in-
crease student learning and ultimately make her a better teacher. After watching the
VIDEO CASE:
video, answer the following questions:
Cooperative There is evidence that cooperative learning can reduce competition and increase
cooperation among students.What evidence of this statement do you see within the
Learning in the
video case?
Elementary Grades: Based on watching this video case, describe some of the benefits and challenges
Jigsaw Model of cooperative learning from the classroom teacher’s perspective.
The text lists the skills that students build as a result of cooperative learning
strategies.Do the students in this video case demonstrate these skills? Please explain which
positive skills you see in action.
**This Video Case reinforces key concepts found in Section II: Instruction and Assessment of the Praxis II
Exam.**
34David W. Johnson and Roger T. Johnson, Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competi-
tive, and Individualistic Learning, 4th ed. (Needham Heights, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon, 1999);
see the University of Minnesota Cooperative Learning Center at www.clcrc.com/: click on
“Cooperative Learning”; and Robert E. Slavin, School and Classroom Organization (Hillsdale,
N.J.: Erlbaum, 1988); Richard H. Priest and Donna R. Sterling, “Team Science” (April 2003),
pp. 38–40.
35Robert E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (Boston: Allyn and Ba-
con, 1995); Robert J. Stevens and Robert E. Slavin, “Effects of a Cooperative Learning Ap-
proach in Reading and Writing on Academically Handicapped and Nonhandicapped
Students,” Elementary School Journal (January 1995), pp. 241–262; Robert Slavin, “Cooperative
Learning and Intergroup Relations” (ERIC Document Number 382730, 1995); David W.
Johnson and Roger T. Johnson, “Making Cooperative Learning Work,” Theory into Practice
(Spring 1999), pp. 67–73; and Sandra Pratt, “Cooperative Learning Strategies,” Science Teacher
(April 2003), pp. 25–29.
36Robert E. Slavin, “When Does Cooperative Learning Increase Student Achievement?” Psy-
chological Bulletin (November 1983), pp. 429–445; Robert E. Slavin, “Synthesis of Research on
Cooperative Learning,” Educational Leadership (February 1991), pp. 71–82; and Robyn Gilles,
“The Behaviors, Interactions and Perceptions of Junior High School Students during Small
Group Learning,” Journal of Educational Psychology (March 2003), pp. 137–147.
432 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
research indicating that groups of four tend to pair off). Teams are balanced by abil-
ity, gender, and ethnicity. Team members provide assistance and feedback to each
other and receive a group performance score on quizzes. They also receive recogni-
tion via bulletin boards, certificates, special activities and privileges, and letters to
parents. The teams are changed every five or six weeks to give students an opportu-
nity to work with others and to give members of low-scoring teams a new chance.37
Standards & Assessment ✓
■ The TAI approach puts more emphasis on mastery of particular skill sheets and
■ TAI on individual diagnosis through pre- and post-testing. Students first work on their
own skill sheets and then have their partners or team members check their answers
and provide assistance. Not until the student scores 80 percent or higher on a practice
quiz is the student certified by the team to take the final test. Teams are scored and
recognized in the same way as with STAD, but criteria are established for “superteams”
(high performance), “great teams” (moderate performance), and “good teams” (min-
imum passing grade). Every day the teacher spends five to fifteen minutes of the forty-
five-minute lesson period with two or three groups at about the same point in the
curriculum. The other teams work on their own during this time.38
Mastery Instruction
Mastery instruction is an instructional plan for all grade levels and subjects. The
approach most widely used in public schools is the Learning for Mastery (LFM)
model, often referred to as mastery learning. Mastery learning has gained support-
ers, particularly in urban school districts that have an obvious and urgent need to
improve academic performance.39
Standards & Assessment ✓
■ Mastery approaches are based on the central argument that nearly all public-
■ Similar mastery for most school students can learn much of the curriculum at practically the same level of
students mastery. Although slower students require a longer time to learn the same materi-
als, they can succeed if their initial level of knowledge is correctly diagnosed and if
they are taught with appropriate methods and materials in a sequential manner, be-
ginning with their initial competency level.40
■ Small units of instruction To accomplish this goal, you would focus attention on small units of instruc-
tion and use criterion-referenced tests to determine whether a student has the skills
required for success at each step in the learning sequence. An entire course such as
third-grade mathematics is too complex to be studied in large units. Instead, you
would break it down into smaller modules and see that your students master each
of them thoroughly (scoring 80 to 90 percent correct on tests) before moving to the
next module.
37
Robert E. Slavin, Using Student Team Learning, 3rd ed. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University
Press, 1986).
38
Thomas R. Guskey, “Benjamin Bloom’s Contributions to Curriculum, Instruction
and School Learning,” 2001 (ED 457185); Thomas L. Good and Jere E. Brophy, Looking in
Classrooms, 5th ed. (New York: HarperCollins, 1997); and Robert E. Slavin, “Team-Assisted
Individualization: Combining Cooperative Learning and Individualized Instruction in Math-
ematics,” in R. E. Slavin, ed., Learning to Cooperate, Cooperating to Learn (New York: Plenum,
1985), pp. 177–209.
39John B. Carroll, “The Carroll Model: A 25-Year Retrospective and Prospective View,” Educa-
■ Positive research findings Hundreds of studies have examined mastery learning. After reviewing this
broad span of literature, several observers have concluded that mastery strategies do
have moderate to strong effects on student learning when compared to conven-
tional methods.41 Studies of entire school districts show that mastery approaches
also succeed in teaching basic skills such as reading and mathematics on which later
learning depends. Moreover, inner-city students profit more from this approach
than from traditional groupings of instruction,42 and even students at risk and those
with learning disabilities achieve at mastery levels.43
■ Questions about mastery Questions and criticisms remain unanswered, however. Many educators, for ex-
instruction ample, are unconvinced that mastery approaches can accomplish “higher-order”
learning, even though Bloom has reported positive gains in higher-order thinking
skills correlated with the mastery learning approach.44 Educators are also uncertain
how well the various mastery approaches work for affective learning or for different
types of students. Moreover, it is unknown to what extent teachers are “teaching to
the test” to avoid blame for students’ failure to master the material.45 Other critics
claim that even though reading, writing, and mathematics are being broken down
into discrete skills and mastered, the students still cannot read, write, or compute
any better. Although students show gains on small skill-acquisition items, this does
not necessarily prove learning.46 Finally, mastery learning and other individualized
instructional systems are difficult to implement. Responsibility falls on the teacher,
who must adapt the instruction to each student. To implement such a plan, you
must continually monitor each student’s work, determine what skills and tasks each
student has mastered, and provide immediate feedback—a challenge in a class of
twenty-five or more students.
Critical Thinking
■ Intelligence that can be Today, we speak of critical thinking and thinking skills to denote problem-solving abil-
taught ity. Interest in this concept has produced an outpouring of articles in the profes-
sional literature, a host of conferences and reports on the subject, and a majority of
states’ efforts to bolster critical thinking for all students.
■ Metacognition Most of the commentators argue that critical thinking is a teachable form of
intelligence. The leading proponents of this school are Matthew Lipman and Robert
41See, for instance, Lorin W. Anderson, “Values, Evidence, and Mastery Learning,” Review of
Educational Research (Summer 1987), pp. 215–223; Benjamin S. Bloom, “The Search for Meth-
ods of Instruction,” in Allan C. Ornstein and Linda S. Behar, eds., Contemporary Issues in
Curriculum (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1995), pp. 208–225; and Stephen Anderson, “Synthesis
of Research on Mastery Learning” (ERIC Document 382567, 1994).
42Daniel U. Levine, “Achievement Gains in Self-Contained Chapter I Classes in Kansas City,”
Educational Leadership (March 1987), pp. 22–23; and Daniel U. Levine and Allan C. Ornstein,
“Research on Classroom and School Effectiveness,” Urban Review (June 1989), pp. 81–94.
43Perry D. Passaro et al., “Instructional Strategies for Reclaiming Schools,” Journal of Emotional
Reconsidered,” Review of Educational Research (Summer 1990), pp. 300–302; and Karen Morse,
“Is Homeschooling Right for You and Your Highly Gifted Child?” Understanding Our Gifted
(Fall 2001), pp. 25–26.
45Herbert J. Walberg, “Productive Teaching,” in Allan C. Ornstein, ed., Teaching: Theory into
Practice (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1995), pp. 43–44, 49; Allan C. Ornstein, “Emphasis on
Student Outcomes Focuses Attention on Quality of Instruction,” NASSP Bulletin (January
1987), pp. 88–95; and Robert E. Slavin, “Mastery Learning Re-Reconsidered.”
46Linda Darling-Hammond, “Mad-Hatter Tests of Good Teaching,” New York Times, January 8,
1984, sect. 12, p. 57; and Marilyn Cochran-Smith, “Word Processing and Writing in Elemen-
tary Classrooms,” Review of Educational Research (Spring 1991), pp. 107–155.
434 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
Sternberg.47 Lipman seeks to foster thirty critical thinking skills, generally designed
for elementary-school grades. These skills include understanding concepts, general-
izations, cause–effect relationships, analogies, part–whole and whole–part connec-
tions, and applications of principles to real-life situations.48 Lipman’s strategy for
teaching critical thinking has children spend a considerable portion of their time
thinking about thinking (a process known as metacognition)49 and about ways in
which effective thinking is distinguished from ineffective thinking.
■ Criticisms of critical thinking Some critics of critical thinking approaches contend that teaching a person to
think is like teaching someone to swing a golf club or tennis racket; it involves a
holistic approach, not the piecemeal effort implied by proponents such as Lipman.
Critical thinking, the critics say, is too complex a mental operation to divide into
small processes; the result depends on “a student’s total intellectual functioning,
not on a set of narrowly defined skills.”50 Moreover, as Sternberg has cautioned, crit-
ical thinking programs that stress “right” answers and objectively scored test items
may be far removed from the problems students face in everyday life.51 Thus many
educators believe that attempts to teach critical thinking as a separate program or as
a particular group of defined skills are self-defeating. Ideally, one might argue, criti-
cal thinking should be integrated into all courses throughout the curriculum so that
students are continually challenged to develop an inquiring attitude and a critical
frame of mind.
Computerized Instruction
■ CAI The role of computers in our schools continues to increase. In 1980, the nation’s
schools used about fifty thousand microcomputers. Twenty years later, by the end
of the twentieth century, this number had soared to more than eight million, and it
continues to grow.52
Patrick Suppes, an early innovator of computer use in schools, coined the term
computer-assisted instruction (CAI). Suppes defined three levels of CAI: practice and
drill, tutoring, and dialogue.53 At the simplest level, students work through com-
puter drills in spelling, reading, foreign languages, simple computations, and so
forth. At the second level, the computer acts as a tutor, taking over the function of
presenting new concepts. As soon as the student shows a clear understanding, he or
she moves to the next exercise. The third and highest level, dialogue, involves an in-
teraction between the student and the computer. The student can communicate
47See, for example, Matthew Lipman et al., Philosophy for Children, 2nd ed. (Philadelphia:
Temple University Press, 1980); and Robert J. Sternberg, “How Can We Teach Intelligence?”
Educational Leadership (September 1984), pp. 38–48; Joanne Harris, “The Skeptical Surfer:
Web Research and Critical Thinking on Controversial Issues,” Green Teacher (Spring 2003),
pp. 21–24.
48
Matthew Lipman, “The Cultivation of Reasoning Through Philosophy,” Educational
Leadership (September 1984), pp. 51–56; Matthew Lipman, “Critical Thinking—What Can It
Be?” Educational Leadership (September 1988), pp. 38–43; and What Works Clearinghouse,
Building Decision Skills, What Works Clearinghouse (September, 2006).
49Matthew Lipman, “Critical Thinking,” in Ornstein and Behar, Contemporary Issues, p. 149.
50William A. Sadler and Arthur Whimbey, “A Holistic Approach to Improving Thinking
with the machine—not only give responses but ask new questions—and the com-
puter will understand and react appropriately.
■ Hypermedia browsing More recent applications often involve a hypermedia approach, which repre-
sents a significant shift in how information is presented and accessed by students.
Hypermedia structures information nonsequentially. “Nodes” or information chunks
are connected through associative, or topically related, links and presented in the
program through text, illustrations, or sound. Thus the hypermedia approach allows
learners to browse through an information base to construct their own relationships.
This process makes learning more meaningful because it relates to the student’s
knowledge structure rather than that of the teacher or a textbook.54 Many educational
CD-ROMs use a hypermedia approach. So, of course, does the World Wide Web, with
its rapid links to diverse and far-ranging sites. Increasingly, the Web presents a variety
of curriculum options for teachers who want to supplement their curriculum program.
■ Problem of equal access Many teachers, once skeptical of computers, are abandoning the chalkboard in
favor of the computer terminal because they believe computers add a challenging
and stimulating dimension to classroom learning. Now, the problem that concerns
many educators is computer access: as former NEA president Keith Geiger put it, the
challenge is “how to ensure every student—rural or urban, rich or poor—access to
the most important learning tool of our time.”55 A majority of students now have at
least some computer access. In 2005, the National Center for Educational Statistics
reported that 100 percent of the nation’s schools were connected to the Internet (up
from 35 percent in 1994). Although only about 14 percent of the nation’s class-
rooms had Internet access in 1996, the number had reached 93 percent by 2003.
The percentage of students with computer access at home (36 percent in 1993)
reached 90 percent in 2003.56 The next challenge is to make good educational use of
the computers available.
Online Study Center Watch the video “Integrating Internet Research: High School Social Studies” to see how a
teacher can use technology in the classroom to encourage student engagement and
aid in student understanding of important concepts. After watching the video, an-
VIDEO CASE:
swer the questions below:
Integrating Describe the multiple skills and pieces of content that students will master as a
result of completing the Civil Rights Scrapbook project.
Internet Research:
Many teachers may be leery of integrating computer use into their classrooms
High School Social and lessons. Based on watching the video case, what are your thoughts about the
Studies pros and cons of technology use in schools?
**This Video Case reinforces key concepts found in Section II: Instruction and Assessment of the Praxis II
Exam.**
54Simon Hooper and Lloyd P. Rieber, “Teaching Instruction and Technology,” in Ornstein
and Behar, Contemporary Issues, pp. 258–259; and Anthony K. Betrus, “Historical Evolution
of Instructional Technology in Teacher Education,” TechTrends (September–October 2002),
pp. 18–21, 33.
55Keith Geiger, “Computer Learning Achieves Lift Off,” Education Week, May 24, 1995,
p. 11; Jennifer Jenson et al., “No One Way: Working Models for Teachers’ Professional
Development,” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 10, no. 4 (2002), pp. 481–496.
56Deb Reichmann, “Nerd Discipline Needed in Schools,” The Sun, September 7, 1998,
p. C4; and The Condition of Education, 2000, Table 418; Digest of Education Statistics, 2005,
Figure 416 and Figure 418.
436 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
■ Impersonal machine or Early in the computer revolution, some educators worried that computerized in-
increased human contact? struction involved students with machines and materials that, in themselves, had
minimal emotional and affective components. Such critics justifiably contended
that substituting a machine for a human teacher left the student with no true guid-
ance and with too little personal interaction. The expansion of the Internet and the
increasing access to it in schools across the country should help combat this imper-
sonal aspect of computers. With e-mail and other electronic means of contact, stu-
dents can reach other people, not merely other collections of information.57
Moreover, the computer can be used to build a sense of inquiry, to “mess about,” to
explore, and to improve thinking skills. When students learn how to think and ex-
plore with the computer, their potential for innovation and creativity is unlimited.58
57Odvard E. Dyrli, “Surfing the World Wide Web to Education Hot Spots,” Technology and
Learning (October 1995), pp. 44–51.
58Robert C. Johnston, “Connecting with Technology,” Education Week, May 10, 1995,
pp. 27–28; and Daniel Kelley et al., “Equal Access: Integrating Technology into the Elem-
entary and Secondary Classroom,” REview (Summer 2001), pp. 63–69.
59Dennis Knapczyk, “Staff Development in Rural Schools Through Distance Education,”
Educational Media International (June 1993), pp. 72–82; Joseph Francis, “Use of Internet
Resources in the Biology Lecture Classroom,” American Biology Teacher (February 2000),
pp. 90–93; and Reid Goldsborough, “The Benefits, and Fear, of Cookie Technology,” Black
Issues in Higher Education (2004), p. 46.
60
Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Study of School Uses of Television and Video: 1996–1997
School Year Summary Report (Washington, D.C.: Corporation for Public Broadcasting, 1997).
61William Harwood and Maureen McMahon, “Effects of Integrated Video Media on Student
Achievement and Attitude in High School Chemistry,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching
(August 1997), pp. 617–631.
Instructional Approaches ■ 437
options and then display the outcome of the option chosen. Interactive videos sup-
ply either individual lessons or instruction in small groups.
■ Virtual reality As one educator says, video technology “is the next best thing to being there.”
In fact, some applications invite students to enter a virtual reality far from their class-
room. They might interact with zookeepers at the San Diego Zoo, plan their up-
coming field trip with local museum staff, or interact directly with White House
staffers on a “hot” issue before the Congress. Video use in schools has increased at
such a staggering rate that teachers must plan ways to integrate it into the curricu-
lum.62 In an era when the number of videos rented from video stores surpasses the
total number of books checked out of libraries, you should help your students be-
come critical video consumers, aware of how visual images affect us as individuals
and as a society.63
Distance Education Many of the electronic systems discussed in the past two sec-
tions have the potential for transporting educational materials and instruction
across long distances. “Distance education” refers to the many ways in which
schools make use of this technology.
■ Educational television via For example, schools may select television programs specifically developed for
satellite or cable educational purposes and have them beamed into the classroom by satellite. This is
particularly useful for small, rural schools with limited local resources, as well as for
colleges and universities as they reach beyond their traditional service areas.64
Schools can also make use of home cable systems that carry educational program-
ming, such as the Discovery, Learning, and History channels, each of which offers
special programs on a wide range of subjects.
■ Teleconferences Widely used in business and industry, teleconferences have also begun to ap-
pear in school systems. In a typical conference, viewers watch a resource person,
teacher, or group of students on the television screen talking to or instructing other
students or participants. Viewers can watch as if they were across the table, even
though they may be thousands of miles away. The viewing audience can ask ques-
tions and make decisions about what further information should be presented.65
■ Rapid spread of distance With the expansion of videophone links and the Internet, distance education is
education becoming a resource not just for isolated or small schools but for any school that
wants to extend its students’ horizons. Widespread workplace computer use—more
than 50 percent of all workers use computers on the job—motivates educators to in-
tegrate computer knowledge and skills into classroom instruction. Colleges and uni-
versities are outpacing public schools with Web-enhanced courses, distance learning,
Web-based courses, and even complete Web-based academic programs. It will be a
62George Peterson, “Geography and Technology in the Classroom,” NASSP Bulletin (October
1994), pp. 25–29; see “Technology Focus” (2003) at www.electronic-school.com; and see
“Windows on the World,” Education Week, February 8, 1995, pp. 36–37.
63Allan C. Ornstein, “Video Technology and the Urban Curriculum,” Education and Urban
Society (May 1991), pp. 335–341; G. Eugene Martin, Technology Education for the 21st Century:
A Collection of Essays (Reston, Va.: Council on Technology and Teacher Education, 2000); and
Wen-Tsai Sung, “Web Based Learning in the Computer Aided Design Curriculum,” Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning (June 2000), pp. 175–187.
64Jerry D. Pepple, Dale A. Law, and Sheri Kallembach, “A Vision of Rural Education for 2001,”
Educational Horizons (Fall 1990), pp. 50–58; Master Plan for Distance Learning: An Evolving
Technological Process (Austin, Tex.: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, 1996); Gary
Marchionini, “Video and Learning Redux: New Capabilities for Practical Use,” Educational
Technology (March–April 2003), pp. 36–41; and Steve Bosak, “Bits in the Ether: Wireless LANS
Leave Cables Behind,” American School Board Journal (March 2000), pp. 38–39, 41.
65
Allan C. Ornstein, “Curriculum Trends Revisited,” Peabody Journal of Education (Summer
1994), pp. 4–20; and Allan C. Ornstein, “Bringing Telecommunications and Videos into the
Classroom,” High School Journal (April–May 1990), pp. 252–257.
438 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
66Peter West, “Satellite Space Crunch Seen Impeding Distance Learning,” Education Week,
March 22, 1995, p. 3; The Condition of Education, 2000, Table 423; and Gene I. Maeroff,
“Classroom of One: The Promise of On-Line Learning,” American School Board Journal (Febru-
ary 2003), pp. 26–28.
67“Distance Learning,” The Electronic School, a supplement to American School Board Journal
(January 1998), pp. A1–40; She-sheng Liaw and Hsiu-mei Huang, “Enhancing Interactivity in
Web-based Instruction: A Review of the Literature,” Educational Technology (May–June 2000),
pp. 41–45; and Sharon Levitch et al., “Transmitting Instructor Skills to the Virtual Class-
room,” Educational Technology (March–April 2003), pp. 42–46.
68National Goals for Education: Goals 2000 (Washington, D.C.: Department of Education,
1994); and The National Educational Goals Report: Building a Nation of Learners (Washington,
D.C.: National Educational Goals Panel, 1998); Nola Purdie et al., “The Learning Needs of
Older Adults,” Educational Gerontology (February 2003), pp. 29–49; and Julia Preece “Beyond
the Learning Society, the Learning World” International Journal of Lifelong Education
(May/June 2006), pp. 307–320.
Emerging Curriculum Trends: An Agenda for the Future ■ 439
69
Allan C. Ornstein, “Curriculum Trends Revisited,” in Allan C. Ornstein and Linda S.
Behar-Horenstein, Contemporary Issues in Curriculum, 2nd ed. (Boston: Allyn and Bacon,
1999), pp. 265–276; Barbara L. McCombs, “Motivation and Lifelong Learning,” Educational
Psychologist (Spring 1991), pp. 117–128; and Lisa Holm and Carol Horn, “Bridging the Gap
Between Schools of Education and the Needs of 21st Century Teachers,” Phi Delta Kappan
(January 2003), pp. 376–380.
70Donald Rallis and Helen Rallis, “Changing the Image of Geography,” Social Studies
(July–August 1995), pp. 167–168; Christopher Shearer, “Geography Education: Learning the
Why of Where,” Principal (January–February 2003), pp. 32–35; and Kathleen K. Manzo.
“Young Adults Do Not Think World Knowledge Is Vital,” Education Week (May 2006), p. 8.
71Meg Sommerfield, “Sciences Group Quietly Unveils Final Standards,” Education Week,
December 13, 1995, pp. 1, 9; and Marion Brady, “The Standards Juggernaut,” Phi Delta
Kappan (February 2001), pp. 460–461; see also “About National Curriculum Standards” at
www.ash.udel.edu/ash/teacher/standards.html; and Sara Wineburg. “What Does NCATE
Have to Say to Future History Teachers? Not Much,” Phi Delta Kappan (May 2005), pp.
658–665; and Julie Bianchini and Greg Kelly, “Challenges of Standards Based Reform,”
Science Education (May 2003), pp. 378–389.
440 ■ Chapter 14 Curriculum and Instruction
72
Susan N. Bales. “How Americans Think About International Education and Why It Mat-
ters,” Phi Delta Kappan (May 2005), pp. 658–665; Myriam Met, “Improving Students’ Capac-
ity in Foreign Language,” Phi Delta Kappan (November 2004), pp. 214–218; and Renate A.
Schulz, “Foreign Language Education in the United States: Trends and Challenges.” See Eric
Review at http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2003/section4/indicator24.asp; Stephanie A.
Neugent, “Foreign Language Instruction in a Global Community,” NASSP Bulletin (January
2000), pp. 35–40.
73
Clark Robenstine, “The School and HIV Education After the First Decade of AIDS” (ERIC
Document 379250, 1994), p. 8; Wanda Blanchett, “Sexual Risk Behaviors of Young Adults
with LD and the Need for HIV/AIDS Education,” Remedial and Special Education
(November–December 2000), pp. 336–345.
74
National Education Goals Panel, National Education Goals Panel Report (1998), at www
.ed.gov/Mailinglists/EDInfo/Archive/msg00410.html; Lauran Neergaard, “Survey: Teens’
Marijuana Use Nearly Doubled over Two Years,” Philadelphia Inquirer, September 13, 1995,
p. A9; and What Works Clearinghouse, “Too Good for Drugs and Violence” (Septem-
ber 2006).
Emerging Curriculum Trends: An Agenda for the Future ■ 441
standards for health education and have called for its inclusion in the high-
school curriculum as a core subject.75
■ Keep up with rapid change 6. Technology Education. Teachers, students, and parents find themselves func-
tioning, at work and at home, in an increasingly technological environment.
In less than fifteen years, we have gone from audiotapes to iPods, from
CDROMs to CD burners, videotapes to DVDs, and transparencies to Power-
Point slides. Who knows what technology we will be talking about in the next
decade, but you can be sure it will be challenging and exciting and have a
significant impact on our lives. Our current generation of students—even
elementary-grade students—are often more technologically proficient than
their teachers and parents. School systems will need to commit both financial
and human resources to help already overloaded faculty stay up-to-date tech-
nologically. Teacher-education programs must prepare new teachers for this
technological world. And, as a teacher, you must continue to stay abreast of
the latest technology before your students outpace you.
■ High immigration rate 7. Immigrant education. The education of immigrant children in America has
growing implications for curriculum. The United States is currently in the
midst of its second largest immigration wave since the beginning of the twen-
tieth century. Legal immigration now accounts for up to one-half of the an-
nual growth in the U.S. population. In fact, nearly one in ten U.S. residents in
1999 was foreign born—double the 1970 figure.76 Additionally, illegal Mexican/
Hispanic immigrants, alone, are currently estimated at over nine million peo-
ple in the United States.
■ Difficulties faced by Cultural differences in learning styles or thinking patterns may lead
immigrant families immigrant children to be mistakenly labeled “learning disabled” or “slow.”
Value hierarchies vary widely across cultures, so that immigrant children
have diverse attitudes about school, teacher authority, gender differences, social
class, and behavior, all of which have implications for their success in school.77
■ Debate about special Many educators believe that immigrant children need special pro-
programs grams, such as expanded bilingual and multicultural education, to help
them acclimate. Multicultural programs also help longer-established groups
understand how much the new immigrants can contribute to American
society. However, as we saw in the chapter on Providing Equal Educational
Opportunity, multicultural education remains a controversial subject, and
schools are still working out their responses to the new rise of immigra-
tion. Some educators believe English-language immersion should take
place as soon as possible. For example, California’s Proposition 227,
enacted in 1998, required the state’s one thousand school districts to
place limited-English-proficient students in English immersion classes rather
than in bilingual classes.78
75
“Core Subjects Status for Health Education Sought,” Education Week, May 10, 1995, p. 5;
Kathy Christie, “Even Students Are What They Eat,” Phi Delta Kappan (January 2003), pp.
341–342; and Mark Kutner, The Health Literacy of America’s Adults (Washington, D.C.: Na-
tional Center for Education Statistics, 2006).
76
Center for Immigration Studies, “Immigration Related Statistics,” Backgrounder (July 1995),
pp. 6, 11; Randy Capps, “Hardship Among Children of Immigrants: Findings from the 1999
Survey of America’s Families,” at http:www.urban.org/Content/Research/NewFederalism; and
Alec Gersberg, Beyond Bilingual Education: New Immigrants and Public School Policies (Washing-
ton, D.C.: Urban Institute, 2006).
77Xue Lan Rong and Judith Preissle, Educating Impaired Students (Thousand Oaks, Calif.:
Activity-centered curricula
helps students internalize
new knowledge and skills.
(© Michael Newman / Photo
Edit, Inc.)
Words of Caution
Although curriculum should evolve to serve a changing society, we caution you on
several fronts. Change for the sake of change is not good. Schools throughout the
ages have thought their programs were on the cutting edge of progress, and they
have often been wrong.
■ Balancing old and new New knowledge, indeed, is not necessarily better than old knowledge. Are we to
throw away most of Aristotle, Galileo, Kepler, Darwin, and Newton merely because
they are not part of this century? If we stress only scientific and technological
knowledge, we could languish physically, aesthetically, morally, and spiritually. We
must learn to prune away old and irrelevant parts of the curriculum and to integrate
and balance new knowledge. As we modify and update content, we need to protect
schools and students against fads and frills, and especially against extremist points
of view. We must keep in perspective the type of society we have, the values we
cherish, and the educational goals we wish to achieve.
Summing Up
In organizing the curriculum, most educators hold to Examples of a subject-centered approach include the
the traditional concept of curriculum as the body of following types of curriculum: (1) subject area, (2) perenni-
subjects, or subject matter. Nevertheless, contemporary alist and essentialist, (3) back-to-basics, and (4) new core.
educators more concerned with the learner’s experi- Examples of a student-centered approach include the
ences regard the student as the focus of curriculum. following types of curriculum: (1) activity-centered
Suggested Projects for Professional Development ■ 443
approaches, (2) relevant curriculum, (3) the humanistic The last two areas of innovation have made distance
approach, (4) alternative or free schools programs, and learning an increasingly important resource.
(5) values-centered curriculum. Future curricular trends will probably include the
Recent decades have produced significant following: (1) lifelong learning, (2) return of geogra-
instructional innovations, including (1) individual- phy, (3) national curriculum standards, (4) inter-
ized instruction, (2) cooperative learning, (3) mastery national education, (5) health education and physical
instruction, (4) critical thinking, (5) computerized in- fitness, (6) technology education, and (7) immigrant
struction, and (6) the use of video and satellite systems. education.
Key Terms
curriculum (413) new core curriculum (core subjects values-centered curriculum (422)
subject-centered curricula (414) approach) (419) individualized instruction (429)
subject-area curriculum (415) student-centered curricula (420) cooperative learning (430)
perennialist approach to curriculum activity-centered curriculum (421) mastery instruction (432)
(415) relevant curriculum (421) critical thinking (433)
essentialist approach to curriculum (417) humanistic approach to curriculum (421) hypermedia (435)
back-to-basics curriculum (417) alternative (free) school (422) distance education (437)
Certification Connection
Chapter 14 examines issues related to Curriculum and In- riculum and instructional innovations presented in the chap-
struction. In the Praxis II: Subject Assessments, you may be ter, select a common topic from the teaching field and outline
required to develop individual lessons or units that demon- a brief unit that utilizes several of the innovative strategies ex-
strate their ability to effectively plan and teach content from amined in the chapter.
their chosen discipline. After reflecting on the types of cur-
Discussion Questions
Discuss the benefits and limitations of using a single Which of the instructional approaches discussed in this
textbook as the basis for a course curriculum. chapter best fits your teaching style? Why? Share your
Does your teacher-education program seem to favor thinking with a classmate.
one curriculum approach over another? Why might List curriculum changes you expect to see in the future.
this be so? What kind of curriculum approach would How will these affect your work as a teacher?
you recommend for a teacher-education program?
Relate your approach to your philosophy of education.
elementary schools. (Or do a similar chart for high would like to know more to further your professional
schools or middle schools.) Show your chart to one or knowledge and development.
more classmates and defend your decisions. Using the following Internet Resources section, select a
Explore the Internet and other electronic resources for topic or unit of instruction and develop a portfolio of
learning. Identify a series of topics about which you resources and sample lesson plans to use as a teacher.
Suggested Resources
Internet Resources Connelly, Michael F., and D. Jean Claudinin. Teachers as Cur-
riculum Planners. New York: Teachers College Press, 1988.
The development of national curriculum standards can be fol- Offers case studies on the role of teachers in planning and
lowed by checking the latest documents on the subject at the developing the curriculum.
U.S. Department of Education’s Internet site (www.ed.gov) or
Doll, Ronald C. Curriculum Improvement: Decision Making
the ERIC database (www.eric.ed.gov/) and searching for cur-
and Process. 9th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1996.
riculum and instructional resources. There are hundreds of
Provides an excellent overview of curriculum improve-
other interesting offerings on the World Wide Web, with new
ment, with emphasis on practical principles, problems,
ones appearing every month. For a sample you might look at
and solutions.
the Teachers College Record—at www.tcrecord.org/: click on
“Featured Articles” and scan the wide array of topics, such as: The Electronic School, 2006. Supplement to the monthly Ameri-
curriculum, assessment and evaluation, diversity, teaching can School Board Journal. This quarterly supplement
and teacher education. And don’t overlook the section on offers excellent suggestions on electronic education and
Book Reviews. electronic educational resources for students, teachers,
Information on curriculum and instruction can also be administrators, and school system leaders.
found by exploring state-level sites and other links accessible Johnson, David W. Reaching Out: Interpersonal Effectiveness
at www.nasbe.org or by using Google, Infoseek, Yahoo!, Alta and Self-Actualization, 5th ed. Needham Heights, Mass.:
Vista, or other search engines for “education journals,” “cur- Allyn and Bacon, 1993. Describes the theory and practice
riculum,” and “educational issues.” of cooperative learning and how to enhance student self-
actualization.
Publications Marzano, Robert J. A Different Kind of Classroom: Teaching
Altbach, Philip G., ed. Textbooks in American Society. Albany: with Dimensions of Learning. Alexandria, Va.: Association
State University of New York Press, 1991. Focusing on for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1992.
how textbooks are produced and selected, this book Describes teaching, the psychology of learning, curriculum
explains the pressures placed on textbook authors and planning, and assessment.
publishers. Ornstein, Allan C., and Francis Hunkins. Curriculum: Founda-
Beyer, Barry K. Critical Thinking. Fastback #385. Bloomington, tions, Principles and Issues. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and
Ind.: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 1995. A Bacon, 2004. An excellent book for researchers, theoreti-
cogent monograph on the essential features of critical cians, and practitioners of curriculum involved in the
thinking and ways to use it in classrooms. development, design, and implementation of elementary-
and secondary-school curriculum.
Boyer, Ernest L. High School: A Report on Secondary Education
in America. New York: Harper and Row, 1983. An analysis Sizer, Theodore R. Horace’s Compromise: The Dilemma of
of high-school curricula in the United States and proposals the American School. Rev. ed. Boston: Houghton Mif-
for a new core curriculum. flin, 1985. This book on school reform remains quite
relevant.
———. The Basic School: A Community of Learning. Princeton,
N.J.: Carnegie Foundation, 1995. A description of Boyer’s ———. Horace’s School: Redesigning the American High School.
proposed eight core commonalities in curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1992. Looks at the goals of U.S.
secondary education and at high schools in particular,
Bruning, Roger, Christy Horn, and Lisa Putlik-Zillig. Web-Based
with a special focus on mastery learning.
Learning: What Do We Know? Where Do We Go? Green-
wich, Conn.: Information Age, 2003. A thorough discus- Slavin, Robert J. Cooperative Learning: Theory Research and
sion of Web-based learning and instruction, including Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1995. An excellent book
critical thinking. on cooperative learning theory and practice.