Api 610
Api 610
Api 610
Presentation by:
Rob Vaughan &
Bill Robertson
•Shell has a formal World Wide Quality Program aimed at delivering a Flawless Start-up
•Lessons learned (LL) and Practices Worth Repeating (PWR) were reviewed and carried forward from
previous projects. It is important to capture both positive and negative experiences from a variety of
sources (previous project mgmt, maintenance, operations, industry colleagues, etc)
•Our LL list went through many review cycles producing quality input being placed in the contractual
language of the purchase order. (Sources of contractual language include ITP’s, audit plan, technical
specifications, technical notes, drawings, etc)
•Specification selection leading to clarification rounds with vendor is a process that can not be rushed
and needs to take multiple rounds. All relevant LL and PWR were reviewed with vendor
— String Test of Prototype LCF Charge Pump revealed issues with rotor dynamics with balance
drum and vibration issues with skid and motors
— Specification clarification / review meetings with vendor can not be rushed and need to be
documented to ensure alignment on expectations.
— Our Project experienced too many late changes to purchasing documents resulting in
escalating costs and projected schedule delays due to confusion of specifications requiring
more clarifications.
— There were too many drawing inconsistencies with fabricated equipment. Issues found after
fabrication had begun, due to coinciding events of concurrent fabrication and engineering.
— Developed an effective process with vendors and EPC to keep track of all new relevant
issues to track them to closures. Rolling Action Item List (RAIL) worked well.
- Having detailed clear Inspection and Test Plans is very important as this provides a leading
indicator of the quality of the equipment you will be receiving
- Debate between 3rd party contract inspectors being used for inspections vs. client personnel
(maintenance, operations, project resources) for inspections
- SUEX-1 used a combination of 3rd Party contract inspectors and dedicated client personnel
inspection. We had dedicated client personnel providing full time inspection at vendor shops
during fabrication of critical equipment orders
- Schedule many multidisciplinary visits to package equipment vendors to ensure that all
disciplines get adequate representation during inspection
- Need to have better alignment on expectations and alignment with 3rd party contract inspector to
ensure goals are clear. Remind them they are to report all findings and they work for the Client
not the Fabricator.
- Do not let Procurement / Expediting drive the quality out of vendor shop. If necessary keep
equipment at vendor’s shop as long as possible to provide time to correct known deficiencies.
Transferring scope or known rework to site is not a good idea as it will push out your schedule
and drive up your costs.
- Use more client personnel for critical equipment inspection, { Example BB5 Charge Pumps}
especially for prior to shipment inspection. Best results are to have the receipt inspection done
at the vendor shop prior to shipping of equipment.
- For Packaged Equipment use multi-disciplinary client inspection teams. Our results indicated that
rotating equipment vendors are being asked to package and their competence or experience is
not high within the other disciplines, etc (tubing, piping, heat trace, wiring, CSA, CRN & ABSA
issues…etc)
Construction Issues
—Cleanliness & Preservation {Pre and Post Installation}
—Levelling & Soft Foot
—Grouting
—Field Machining
—Piping Installation
Alignment
Construction Key Learning's
Daily meetings with Operations, Vendor Field Representative, Shell Millwrights & Project
Engineering staff for inspection assignments and overall alignment
Formal weekly meetings with Area Works Construction Contractor. These meetings have Rolling
Action Item Lists and allow the AWC to have clear communication lines to the project for
immediate issue resolution
AWC has direct access and works continually with Shell Inspection on a daily basis
Rotating Equipment Installation Workshops once a month, site meetings to review installation
procedure at various stages of project. Key aspects of upcoming jobs
- EIR Program consisted of all Equipment to receive inspection upon arrival to site by Shell
Operations and Maintenance Staff.
- For the Rotating Equipment the team consisted of 8 millwrights, 2 contract inspectors, and 3
engineers dedicated to program
- All equipment received inspection according to premade checklists & all deficiencies were
photographed and recoded for NCR records (used API 686 Ch 3 as guide for checklist
development)
- For 251 pumps a total of 1062 ERRORS FOUND CAUSING 313 NCR’S TO BE WRITTEN!
Typical issues:
1. Damage due to shipping
2. Verify ship loose items (misplaced, lost in transit, never shipped, etc...)
3. Shims not laser cut and/or are the wrong size
4. Motor does not have 8 jacking bolts
5. Suction/discharge/drain flanges are not covered with a metal closure
6. Water present in the case and drain lines
7. Oil mist lubricated bearings preserved with grease
8. Mounting pads do not meet the level requirements of API 610 and Purchase Order
9. Baseplate lacks levelling screws
10. Motor is bolt bound
For SUEX-1 the Major Hold and Witness Points for the Field Inspection and Test Plan
for Centrifugal Horizontal Pumps were:
Hold:
— Submit Contractor Installation Work Packages (first of every kind)
— Pre-grouting Meeting for alignment of path forward
— Oil System Installation, verification and flushed
— Final Alignment
Witness:
— Pre-installation Baseplate level check
— Pre-installation Preliminary alignment
— Pre-installation soft foot check
— Soft foot check
— Piping equipment / suction system cleanliness
— Pipe stress and flange alignment
Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 18
Inspection and Test Plan
Field Inspection and Test Plan of Centrifugal Horizontal Pumps
Uncovered flanges
Incomplete PM cards
Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc CONFIDENTIAL Enter document title in Footer (Insert > Header & Footer > Apply to All) 23
Construction Issues
Leveling & Soft Foot
Follow Procedure
Test if pump or pedestal is not level
(API 686 Ch 5 Appendix D Figures D1-D10)
Need Pre Grout NCR Agreement Sign off by vendor
“YOU GROUT IT YOU OWN IT”
Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc Enter document title in Footer (Insert > Header & Footer > Apply to All) 26
Construction Issues Grouting
Need continuous
temperature of 25 C,
Hoarding required for
temperature control even in
summer time
Heat is the key to getting
good grout flow
Issues
Unanticipated high vibration of pumps running off of BEP
Minor cavitation issues
Very few leaks, casing, tubing, instrumentation, etc
Mechanical Seals preservation damage (residual hydro test fluid)
Minor vibration of motor bases
Strainers with a weak delta pressure design
Outcome
Plant was commissioned and Start-up in Spring of 2011
No major incidents, and start-up progression achieved a Flawless Start-up