Innovative Technology
Innovative Technology
Innovative Technology
1 INTRODUCTION
In the past, engineers relied on technology, related to generally available minerals, to design
the earthing systems for various applications like power stations, buildings, railways,
industrial complexes, water & gas plants etc. These earthing systems required presence of
water to maintain.
In the late 19th century Marconite® was specifically developed to meet the requirement of all
type of earthing applications but without the need of water it. It is electrically conductive
black granular, used as backfill material to enhance the effectiveness of the earth to achieve
durable, stable and low resistance performing earthing solutions for all types of soil and
difficult ground conditions.
Marconite® conducts electricity much the same way as metals, through the movement of
electrons. It does not require water to conduct electricity and is not affected by dryness like
other ionic based earthing materials such as Bentonite, Charcoal etc. which always require
the presence of an effective electrolyte else they dry out and do not conduct electricity.
Marconite® conductive concrete is one of the most suitable materials for treatment of soil.
Electrical engineers have been using it to tackle the toughest soil conditions so as to achieve
satisfactory earthing solutions throughout the World for over 50 years.
2 SALIENT FEATURES
2.1 Specifications:
e) Thermal Stability Between (–) 10% and (+) 60% ambient temperature
2.2 Ultra Low Resistivity: The resistivity of Marconite® is 0.001 Ω-m and when mixed with
Portland cement it is still 0.040 Ω-m, which is significantly lower than other earthing
materials:-
2.3 Versatile: Marconite® is suitable for all types of soil/ground conditions. It becomes a
permanent solid structure and does not shrink or gets washed away. It does not require
moisture at all. It performs very well in dry soil and hottest climatic conditions.
2.5 Contact area: Solid structure provides larger surface area for dissipation, thus
dissipates current faster.
2.7 Non-corrosive: Marconite® does not corrode steel or copper conductor or attacks
cement structures. It may be noted:-
b) That GIS equipment uses earthed metal screens / enclosures around individual
phase conductors and residual AC current flows continuously via earthing system.
This causes additional corrosion of earth conductor.
Marconite® encapsulated electrodes are the best solution to protect such corrosion.
2.8 Life: Marconite® based earthing systems has a life of more than 50 years.
2.9 Maintenance: Absolutely maintenance free and does not need water for life. No need to
remove, replace or recharge it in order to maintain the desired earth resistance value.
2.10 Environment friendly: Marconite® does not leach and pollute ground water channels
like other earthing systems. Use of Marconite® also saves trees from burning to get
charcoal.
2.11 No environmental hazard: Marconite® does not pose any environmental hazard for
future generations even after the completion of it’s life as it disintegrates with soil like
any other concrete structure.
2.12 Cost effective: Especially in high resistivity soils, sandy or water logged areas.
2.13 Lowest ownership cost: Long and maintenance free life of Marconite® based earthing
Systems makes it’s cost lowest among all other earthing systems.
2.15 No space constraint: Gas insulated substation (GIS) occupies only 15 - 25% of the area
occupied by the equivalent AIS. Hence it becomes difficult to achieve the required level
of Earth resistance in small areas. Marconite® encapsulated deep driven rods are the
best solution to achieve low value of ground resistance in such cases.
3 TECHNICAL REFERENCES
Many standards, technical books & papers and web sites have reference of Marconite®
conductive concrete/ concrete-encased electrodes. Few of them are mentioned below:-
3.1 IS: 3043 (1st Rev Draft ) Cl 9.2.5 for electrode encased in low resistivity material, e.g.
Conducting concrete page 71-73. (Under revision by BIS)
3.2 BS: 7430: 2011 Cl 9.5.7 for electrode encased in low resistivity material, e.g.
Conducting Concrete page 74-76.
3.3 IEEE Std 80 -2000 Clause 14.6 for concrete encased electrodes page 68.
3.4 Engineers Hand Book on Sub Station Engineering design, Concepts and Computer
Applications by R S Dahiya, Kartson books - page 180.
3.5 Mc Graw Hill Material’s handbook by George S. Brandy, Henery R. Clauser & J A.
Vaccaril – page 265.
3.6 Achieving an acceptable Ground in poor soil-Paper by Keith Switzer, ERICO, Inc.
3.7 WALLIS Soil Survey Report of Royal Offices, Oman recommending the use of Electrically
Conductive aggregate Marconite®.
4 TESTS/REPORTS
Marconite® conductive concrete and it’s electrodes were tested at various independent
National and International laboratories besides testing of material resistivity of each batch is
carried out by the manufacturer i.e. M/s Carbon International Limited, UK and test report is
provided with all the consignments. Results of tests are appended below:-
4.2 Resistivity - Concrete: Marconite concrete (2 Parts Marconite + 1 Part Cement) was
tested by one of the overseas laboratory i.e. Fugro Middle East, Dubai for their client
M/s Trade Circle Ltd., and material was used for world famous building in Dubai i.e.
Palm Jumeirah.
4.3 Short Current - Electrode: The test was carried out by Central Power Research
Institute, Bangalore on two specimens of different sizes of Marconite concrete earth
electrodes:-
b) MS rod L 3 m, D 40 mm,
Marconite ® Encapsulation
L 2.9 m, D 100 mm 80.52 40.13 1.11 29
4.4 Earth Resistance - Electrode: Central Power Research Institute, Bangalore measured
performance of two specimens of Marconite concrete earth electrodes after 38 days of
installation with soil resistivity of 468.29 Ω-m of trial ground:-
Results:
Specimens
a) Cu rod L 3 m, D 16 mm ,
Marconite® encapsulation L 3 m, D 100 mm = 90.87 Ω
b) MS rod L 3 m, D 40 mm ,
Marconite® encapsulation L 3 m, D 200 mm = 55.43 Ω
4.5 Compressive Strength - Cube: Two specimens of 200mm³ cubes were tested by Central
Midland Laboratories Birmingham, UK for compressive strength after 7 & 28 days:-
Results:
After 7 Days After 28 Days
Specimen
c) One 22.0 N/mm² 27.5 N/mm²
Conclusion: “It produced a low resistivity and highly conductive material in its
Hardened State”
4.6 Chemical Test – ROH’s: Marconite aggregate was tested by Muscot Laboratory Service,
Bangalore, (DGQA, Ministry of Defense, GOI approved) for various chemicals:-
Results:
4.7 CBIP Technical Report no 78 1991: Evaluation of Concrete Encased Electrodes & Use of
Structural Steel for Earthing was carried jointly by CBIP & Dept. of Electrical
Engineering, Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh.
c) Short duration large currents (like Lightning surges) have negligible effect on the
bond between steel and concrete.
Conclusion: Natural steel under such conditions may be safely used as grounding
electrode.
5.1 Methodology: Marconite® conductive aggregate is mixed with cement normally in the
ratio of 2:1 [2 Parts Marconite: 1 Part Cement] and add one litre of water per kg of
total mix to form a fairly dry mix. Normally a bore hole of up to 100 mm Dia may be
used. But if required deeper bore holes may be made rather than increasing the Dia of
bore hole because surface area benefits obtained with larger diameters are usually
negated by the added costs of drilling larger Dia bore holes and increased quantity of
Marconite®.
5.2 Single Electrode: Marconite® concrete is poured around the metal conductor in the
augured borehole and left it to set into a permanent solid structure.
5.3 Earth Grid: Horizontal conductor of the grid is embedded in Marconite® concrete for
larger surface area. It saves over sizing of steel rods, which is used to counter the
effect of corrosion in bare rod designs.
5.4 Earth Grid Joints: Cross, parallel and riser’s joints of earth grid conductor are
embedded in Marconite® conductive concrete to prevent the opening of welded joints
due to corrosion. This keeps connectivity of the grid intact for it’s life.
Environmental
14 Environment Conductive concrete Trees cut for charcoal. Back fill materials
friendly does not leach or Salt dissolves and leaches into ground
pollute earth water pollutes the water and pollutes the water
channel. Save trees. channel. channel.
1 Capital Cost
d Total no of units
2.52 X 6.25=15.75 1.33 X 5 = 6.65
required for a life of One unit
or 16 units or 7 Units
50+ yrs [ b*c]
e As CPWD DSR 2014
Cost of one unit 4.5 m Rs 3,926/- or
As CPWD DSR 2014
Rs 16,500/- each Rs 4,500/-
with installation 3.0 m Rs 2,618/-
f Capital cost of
Rs 16.500/- X 1 = Rs 2,618/- X 16 = Rs 4,500/- X 7 =
electrode’s 50 yrs
Rs 16,500/- Rs 41,888/- Rs 31,500/-
life
2 Maintenance Cost
a
Water or - Water & watering - Water & watering
Cost of Water, Salt
labour labour
and Labor for one recharge is not
unit. required for life.
Water yrly 6 times : Water yrly 6 times :
Rs 10 X 6 = Rs 60/- Rs 10 X 6 = Rs 60/-
b
Total Capital cost + Rs 16.500/- + Nil Cap Rs 41,888/-, Cap Rs 31,500/-,
Maintenance of one Maintenance = Maint. Rs 91,280/- Maint. Rs 51,345/-
electrode for 50 yrs Rs 16,500/- = Rs 1,33,168/- = Rs 82,845/-
Resistivity Ω
Marconite Marconite
Driven Rod Pipe Plate Driven Rod Pipe Plate
Embedded Embedded
D.1, L 3 .6 X .6 D.1, L 3 .6 X .6
D.016,L3m D.04,L3m D.016,L3m D.04,L3m
m m m m
1 0.24 0.33 0.29 0.52 110 26.14 36.83 31.48 57.46
2 0.48 0.67 0.57 1.04 115 27.33 38.50 32.91 60.07
3 0.71 1.00 0.86 1.57 120 28.51 40.18 34.34 62.68
4 0.95 1.34 1.14 2.09 125 29.70 41.85 35.78 65.29
5 1.19 1.67 1.43 2.61 130 30.89 43.52 37.21 67.90
6 1.43 2.01 1.72 3.13 135 32.08 45.20 38.64 70.51
8 1.90 2.68 2.29 4.18 140 33.27 46.87 40.07 73.12
10 2.38 3.35 2.86 5.22 145 34.45 48.54 41.50 75.74
12 2.85 4.02 3.43 6.27 150 35.64 50.22 42.93 78.35
14 3.33 4.69 4.01 7.31 155 36.83 51.89 44.36 80.96
16 3.80 5.36 4.58 8.36 160 38.02 53.57 45.79 83.57
18 4.28 6.03 5.15 9.40 165 39.21 55.24 47.22 86.18
20 4.75 6.70 5.72 10.45 170 40.39 56.91 48.65 88.79
22 5.23 7.37 6.30 11.49 180 42.77 60.26 51.52 94.02
24 5.70 8.04 6.87 12.54 185 43.96 61.94 52.95 96.63
26 6.18 8.70 7.44 13.58 190 45.15 63.61 54.38 99.24
28 6.65 9.37 8.01 14.62 195 46.33 65.28 55.81 101.9
30 7.13 10.04 8.59 15.67 200 47.52 66.96 57.24 104.5
32 7.60 10.71 9.16 16.71 210 49.90 70.31 60.10 109.7
34 8.08 11.38 9.73 17.76 220 52.27 73.65 62.96 114.9
36 8.55 12.05 10.30 18.80 230 54.65 77.00 65.83 120.1
38 9.03 12.72 10.88 19.85 240 57.03 80.35 68.69 125.4
40 9.50 13.39 11.45 20.89 250 59.40 83.70 71.55 130.6
42 9.98 14.06 12.02 21.94 260 61.78 87.05 74.41 135.8
44 10.45 14.73 12.59 22.98 270 64.15 90.39 77.27 141.0
46 10.93 15.40 13.17 24.03 280 66.53 93.74 80.14 146.2
48 11.41 16.07 13.74 25.07 290 68.91 97.09 83.00 151.5
50 11.88 16.74 14.31 26.12 300 71.28 100.4 85.86 156.7
52 12.36 17.41 14.88 27.16 325 77.22 108.8 93.02 169.8
54 12.83 18.08 15.45 28.21 350 83.16 117.2 100.2 182.8
56 13.31 18.75 16.03 29.25 375 89.10 125.5 107.3 195.9
58 13.78 19.42 16.60 30.29 400 95.04 133.9 114.5 208.9
60 14.26 20.09 17.17 31.34 175 41.58 58.59 50.09 91.41
62 14.73 20.76 17.74 32.38 425 100.98 142.3 121.6 222.0
64 15.21 21.43 18.32 33.43 450 106.92 150.7 128.8 235.0
66 15.68 22.10 18.89 34.47 475 112.86 159.0 135.9 248.1
68 16.16 22.77 19.46 35.52 500 118.80 167.4 143.1 261.2
70 16.63 23.44 20.03 36.56 550 130.69 184.1 157.4 287.3
72 17.11 24.11 20.61 37.61 600 142.57 200.9 171.7 313.4
74 17.58 24.77 21.18 38.65 650 154.45 217.6 186.0 339.5
76 18.06 25.44 21.75 39.70 700 166.33 234.4 200.3 365.6
78 18.53 26.11 22.32 40.74 750 178.21 251.1 214.7 391.7
80 19.01 26.78 22.90 41.79 800 190.09 267.8 229.0 417.9
82 19.48 27.45 23.47 42.83 850 201.97 284.6 243.3 444.0
84 19.96 28.12 24.04 43.87 900 213.85 301.3 257.6 470.1
86 20.43 28.79 24.61 44.92 950 225.73 318.1 271.9 496.2
88 20.91 29.46 25.19 45.96 1000 237.61 334.8 286.2 522.3
90 21.38 30.13 25.76 47.01 1050 249.49 351.5 300.5 548.4
92 21.86 30.80 26.33 48.05 1100 261.37 368.3 314.8 574.6
94 22.34 31.47 26.90 49.10 1150 273.25 385.0 329.1 600.7
96 22.81 32.14 27.48 50.14 1200 285.13 401.8 343.4 626.8
98 23.29 32.81 28.05 51.19 1250 297.01 418.5 357.8 652.9
100 23.76 33.48 28.62 52.23 1500
105 24.95 35.15 30.05 54.84 2000
9.1 General Requirement: Designing of proper grounding is a necessity for any electrical
power system. A good grounding system provides a low-impedance path for electrical
system’s fault & lightning induced currents to enter the mother earth and also provides
safety. Effectiveness of a buried grounding system depends on many factors like:-
Soil characteristics such as moisture content, soil temperature and type; which
determines the resistivity of the earth.
Resistance of the earth (or earth resistivity); which significantly impacts overall
impedance of the buried conductor.
9.2 Typical Soil Conditions and Resistivity: Typical soils across the World clearly show that
a totally homogeneous soil is difficult to find. Layers of soils consist of differing
materials having different resistivity are found in it’s strata, which can also be repeated
at lower depths. It is also possible to even find irregularities such as rocks and other
deposits accumulated over a number of years. In essence it is necessary to first carry
out a thorough soil investigation for designing an appropriate earthing system. Table 3
of IS 3043, reproduced below, illustrates not only the ranges of soil resistivity typical of
different soil types, but also clearly shows that soil resistivity can further vary according
to climatic conditions, particularly in relation to moisture. Hence it is necessary to
obtain a more precise knowledge of local soil conditions.
Climate condition
Low rainfall
Normal and
& desert
high rainfall Underground
Probable conditions
(i.e. greater Waters
Type of soil values (i.e. less than
than 500 mm a (saline)
250 mm a
year)
year)
Range of values encountered
Ω-m Ω-m Ω-m Ω-m
Alluvium and lighter clays 5 * See note *See note 1 to 5
Clays (excluding alluvium) 10 5 to 20 10 to 100
Marls (e.g. Keuper marl) 20 10 to 30 50 to 300
Porous limestone (e.g. chalk) 50 30 to 100
Porous sandstone(e.g. Keuper
100 30 to 300
sandstone and clay shale’s)
Quartzite, compact and
crystalline lime stone (e.g. 300 100 to 1000
carboniferous marble)
Clay slates and slate shale’s 1000 300 to 3000 1000 upwards 30 to 100
Granite 1000
Fissile slates, schist’s, gneiss
2000 1000 upwards
and igneous rocks
Note: * Depends on water level or locality
9.3 Measurement of soil resistivity: Many methods are applied for soil resistivity
measurements but one well documented method of determining soil resistivity is the
Wenner’s Survey – 4 electrodes method as per IS 3043, as reproduced here.
~
V
C₁ P₁ P₂ C₂
Ground
Formula: ρ = 2ΠaR
Where
b) One rod test method: This is a simpler test method than the Wennner’s test
method. The resistance of a single rod, which is driven into the ground for a known
depth, is measured. The resistance measurement and rod dimensions may then be
used to calculate the average soil resistivity. The resistance measurement is done
by using the 61.8% method. The formula for calculating the resistance to earth
resistance (R) of a vertical rod given may be used:
RL
8L
{log e ( ) 1}
d
Where:
A paper by US AID India has addressed this issue and indicated the generally accepted
resistance value for different applications which may be based on prevailing established
11.1 Electrodes or Earth matt: Once the soil resistivity has been determined then effective
earthing system can be designed to meet the earth resistance requirement by using
IEEE 80: 2000 Standard - Safety in ac sub-station grounding or such other standards.
Any particular earthing system can be: -
Earthing electrodes are often installed in straight lines, but it is not always essential. In
case the space is limited, then a zigzag system can also be installed by ensuring
necessary distance between the electrodes.
11.2 T Piece system: This system combines a borehole of appropriate size with a horizontal
trench. It can be used in areas with limited space and is useful in low resistivity soils.
There is also an option for connecting T piece systems together to achieve the required
earth resistance value. If necessary, a combination of bore holes and T pieces systems
can also be used to further reduce the earth resistance. This system is used at a
minimum depth of 1 meter to minimize the effects of frost.
Where
ρ = Soil Resistivity in Ohm – Meters
A = Area of the Plate in M2 (Both sides)
R=
Where
R = Earth Resistance in ohms,
L = Length of Pipe / Rod in meters.
D = Diameter of Pipe /Rod in meters,
ρ = Soil Resistivity in Ohm – meters
2l 2
Rg log e ohms
2l wt
Where
l = Length of the strip in meters
w = Depth of burial of the electrode in meters
t = Width (in the case of strip) or twice the diameter (for round conductor) in m
Where
RCE = Resistance of Concrete encased earth electrode.
ρ = Soil resistivity Ω-m
PC = Resistivity of concrete – Marconite Ω-m
DC = Diameter of the Marconite shell in mm
d = Diameter of ground rod
Lr = Length of the rod in m
Ln = Log natural
12.5 Mat Earthing
Ohms
Schwarz’s
Where
r = is the radius of a circle with same area or that occupied by grid in meters
ρ = Resistivity of the soil (assumed uniform) in ohm-m
LT = Total effective length of grounding system conductor, including grid & rods m.
h = Depth of grid burial (m)
A = Total area enclosed by ground gird (m2)
R1 = Ground Resistance of gird conductors in Ω
R 2 = Ground Resistance of all ground rod in Ω
R12 = Mutual Ground Resistance between the group of gird conductors R1 & group
of ground Rods R2 in Ω
Where
ρ = Apparent Resistivity of Soil in Ohm – m
a = Twice the diameter of the Rod (m)
b = Radius of the Ring (m)
13 CASE STUDIES
In order to demonstrate the practical benefits of use of Marconite® many studies were
carried out to compare Marconite® encapsulated electrodes with other earthing systems,
which clearly shows better performance. Few cases are mentioned below:-
13.1 CPRI Campus, Bangalore, India: Marconite® embedded electrode was installed for
measurement of Earth resistance at Central Power Research Institute, Bangalore
a) Parameters:
Size of metal conductor – Cu rod = L 3 m, D 16 mm
Size of Marconite® encapsulation = L 2.9 m, D 100 mm
b) Measurements taken:
Apparent soil resistivity of the trial ground = 468.29 Ω-m
Earth resistance of Marconite encapsulated electrode = 90.87 Ω
=42.04 %
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 42%
=62.84%
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 63 %
=44.41%
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 44 %
13.2 CPRI Campus, Bangalore (II): Marconite® embedded electrode was installed for
measurement at Central Power Research Institute, Bangalore
a) Parameters:
Size of metal conductor – MS rod = L 3.1 m, D 40 mm
Size of Marconite® encapsulation = L 3 m, D 200 mm
b) Measurements taken:
Apparent soil resistivity of the trial ground = 468.29 Ω-m
Earth resistance of Marconite encapsulated electrode = 55.43 Ω
= 57.52%
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 58 %
13.3 NDMC, New Delhi: Marconite® embedded electrode was installed and connected to
11kV substation at Chanderlok Building, New Delhi:-
a) Parameters:
Size of metal conductor – Cu rod = L 3 m, D 16 mm
Size of Marconite® encapsulation = L 2.9 m, D 100 mm
b) Measurements taken:
Apparent soil resistivity = 14.56 Ω-m
Earth resistance of Marconite encapsulated electrode = 00.15 Ω
= 96.92%
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 97 %
b) Measurements taken:
Apparent soil resistivity = 38.28 Ω-m
Earth resistance of Marconite encapsulated electrode = 00.76 Ω
c) Theoretical Calculations of Earth Resistance:
Bare MS rod - L 30.5 m, D 16 mm = 1.72 Ω
d) Comparison of performance – % of Improvement :
Bare MS rod - L 30.5 m, D 16 mm and;
Marconite encapsulation - L 30.4 m, D 100 mm
= 55.91 %
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 56 %
13.5 Apollo Hospital, New Delhi: Marconite® embedded electrode was installed and
connected to DG set of Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Sarita Vihar, and New Delhi.
a) Parameters:
Size of metal conductor – MS rod = L 10.1 m, D 16 mm
Size of Marconite® encapsulation = L 10 m, D 100 mm
b) Measurements taken:
Apparent soil resistivity = 22.00 Ω-m
Earth resistance of Marconite encapsulated electrode = 00.51 Ω
c) Theoretical Calculations of Earth Resistance:
Bare MS rod - L 10.1 m, D 16 mm = 2.61 Ω
d) Comparison of performance – % of Improvement :
Bare MS rod - L 10.1 m, D 16 mm and;
Marconite encapsulation – L 10 m, D 100 mm
= 80.45 %
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 80 %
13.6 Indian Oil Corp. Ltd., Panipat: Marconite® embedded electrode was installed and
connected to electrical system of Panipat Refinery of IOL Ltd., Panipat, Haryana
a) Parameters:
Size of metal conductor – Cu rod = L 3 m, D 16 mm
Size of Marconite® encapsulation = L 2.9 m, D 100 mm
b) Measurements taken:
Apparent soil resistivity = 19.50 Ω-m
Earth resistance of Marconite encapsulated electrode = 1.84 Ω
c) Theoretical Calculations of Earth Resistance:
Bare Cu rod - L 3 m, D 16 mm = 6.52 Ω
d) Comparison of performance – % of Improvement :
Bare Cu rod - L 3 m, D 16 mm and;
Marconite® encapsulation – L 2.9 m, D 100 mm
= 71.82 %
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 72 %
= 68.74 %
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 69 %
13.8 Bhushan Steel Ltd., Sahahibabad, UP: Marconite® embedded electrode was installed
and connected to IT system.
a) Parameters:
Size of metal conductor – Cu rod = L 15 m, D 16 mm
Size of Marconite® encapsulation = L14.950m, D100
b) Measurements taken:
Apparent soil resistivity = 33.00 Ω-m
Earth resistance of Marconite encapsulated electrode = 1.69 Ω
c) Theoretical Calculations of Earth Resistance:
Bare Cu rod – L 15 m, D 16 mm = 2.77 Ω
d) Comparison of performance – % of Improvement :
Bare Cu rod - L 15 m, D 16 mm and;
Marconite encapsulation – L 14.95 m, D 100 mm
= 39.05 %
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 39 %
13.9 Bhushan Steel Ltd., Bhikaji Kama Place, New Delhi: Marconite® embedded electrode
was installed and connected to IT system.
a) Parameters:
Size of metal conductor – MS rod = L 25 m, D 16 mm
Size of Marconite® encapsulation = L 24.9m, D 100 mm
b) Measurements taken:
Apparent soil resistivity = 20.52 Ω-m
Earth resistance of Marconite encapsulated electrode = 0.86 Ω
= 21.91 %
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 22 %
= 77.11 %
Improvement in Ground Resistance by 77 %
14 CUSTOMER REFERENCES
a) Power Plants
Pune Municipal Corporation, Pune : 10 MW waste to energy plant in Pune
Karnataka Power Corp. Ltd., Bangalore : 700 MW Bellary Thermal Power Plant
NTPC Ltd., New Delhi : Gas power plant in Faridabad
d) Signal Applications
Indian Air Force, Palam : 73 RMU at Technical Area , Palam Airport, Dli
HQ 5 Signal Group, India Army : ACON Facility at Delhi Cantt.
Military Collage of Telecom Engg. Mhow : Army Mobile Communications Lorry
Prasar Bhartti, New Delhi : Jam Nagar House, New Delhi
Vodaphone : Facility at Karnal, Haryana
e) Medical
Apollo Hospital, New Delhi : MRI and DG set
Saket City Hospital, Saket : MRI, CT Scanners & x-ray equipment
Sadhu Vaswani Mission Med Ctr : IT applications
f) Industrial Plants
Indian Oil Corporation : Refinery at Panipat
National Fertilizer Ltd. : Plant at Panipat.
Hindustan Prefab Ltd. : Plant at New Delhi
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre: At Navi Mumbai
Bhushan Steel Ltd. Sahibabad : Plant at Sahibabad
The Kalgidhar Society : More than 50 schools in Punjab & Haryana
Ahuja Radio Ltd. : Factory at Okhla, New Delhi.
Vulcan Industries : Factory at Ph III Okhla, New Delhi.
SUMMARY: This Technical Bulletin documents the significant benefits that can be obtained by
designing and using an earthing system based on Marconite® conductive concrete. We believe
that Marconite® would provide a cost effective solution to your earthing requirements.
DISCLAMER: The information given in this document is authentic, to the best of our knowledge and belief but neither
James Durrans & Sons Limited, UK, Carbon International Limited UK nor Inter-Tech, New Delhi and their representatives
are responsible for any variations found hitherto.