Theory of Production in Short Run
Theory of Production in Short Run
Production function
The production function of a firm is a relationship between inputs used and output
produced by the firm. For various quantities of inputs used, it gives the maximum
quantity of output that can be produced.
Consider the farmer we mentioned above. For simplicity, we assume that the farmer
uses only two inputs to produce wheat: land and labour. A production function tells us
the maximum amount of wheat he can produce for a given amount of land that he uses,
and a given number of hours of labour that he performs. Suppose that he uses 2 hours of
labour/ day and 1 hectare of land to produce a maximum of 2 tonnes of wheat. Then, a
function that describes this relation is called a production function.
q = K × L,
Where, q is the amount of wheat produced, K is the area of land in hectares, L is the
number of hours of work done in a day. Describing a production function in this manner
tells us the exact relation between inputs and output. If either K or L increases, q will
also increase. For any L and any K, there will be only one q. Since by definition we are
taking the maximum output for any level of inputs, a production function deals only
with the efficient use of inputs. Efficiency implies that it is not possible to get any more
output from the same level of inputs.
The inputs that a firm uses in the production process are called factors of production. In
order to produce output, a firm may require any number of different inputs. However,
for the time being, here we consider a firm that produces output using only two factors
of production – labour and capital. Our production function, therefore, tells us the
maximum quantity of output (q) that can be produced by using different combinations
of these two factors of productions-
q = f(L,K) (3.1)
Where, L is labour and K is capital and q is the maximum output that can be produced.
1
A numerical example of production function is given in Table 3.1. The left column shows
the amount of labour and the top row shows the amount of capital. As we move to the
right along any row, capital increases and as we move down along any column, labour
increases. For different values of the two factors, the table shows the corresponding
output levels.
For example, with 1 unit of labour and 1 unit of capital, the firm can produce at most 1
unit of output; with 2 units of labour and 2 units of capital, it can produce at most 10
units of output; with 3 units of labour and 2 units of capital, it can produce at most 18
units of output and so on.
In our example, both the inputs are necessary for the production. If any of the inputs
becomes zero, there will be no production. With both inputs positive, output will be
positive. As we increase the amount of any input, output increases.
The law of diminishing marginal returns is a theory in economics that predicts that after
some optimal level of capacity is reached; adding an additional factor of production will
actually result in smaller increases in output.
The law of diminishing marginal returns is also referred to as the "law of diminishing
returns," the "principle of diminishing marginal productivity," and the "law of variable
2
proportions." This law affirms that the addition of a larger amount of one factor of
production, ceteris paribus, inevitably yields decreased per-unit incremental returns.
The law does not imply that the additional unit decreases total production, which is
known as negative returns; however, this is commonly the result.
Diminishing returns occur in the short run when one factor is fixed (e.g. capital)
If the variable factor of production is increased (e.g. labour), there comes a point
where it will become less productive and therefore there will eventually be a
decreasing marginal and then average product.
This is because, if capital is fixed, extra workers will eventually get in each
other’s way as they attempt to increase production. E.g. think about the
effectiveness of extra workers in a small café. If more workers are employed,
production could increase but more and more slowly.
This law only applies in the short run because, in the long run, all factors are
variable.
Example:
Assume the wage rate is £10, then an extra worker costs £10.
The Marginal Cost (MC) of a sandwich will be the cost of the worker divided by
the number of extra sandwiches that are produced
Therefore as MP increases MC declines and vice versa
Total Product (TP) This is the total output produced by workers
Marginal Product (MP) This is the output produced by an extra worker.
3
The first worker adds two goods. If a worker costs £20. The MC of those two
units is 20/2 = 10.
The 3rd worker adds six goods. The MC of those six units are 20/6 = 3.3
The 5th worker adds an extra ten goods. The MC of these 10 is just 2.
After the 5th worker, diminishing returns sets in, as the MP declines. As extra
workers produce less, the MC increases.
4
In this example, after three workers, diminishing returns sets in.
After employing 4 workers or more – the marginal product (MP) of the worker declines
and the marginal cost (MC) starts to rise.
Video: https://youtu.be/lt6LpwBNSlM
Total Product
Suppose we vary a single input and keep all other inputs constant. Then for different
levels of that input, we get different levels of output. This relationship between the
variable input and output, keeping all other inputs constant, is often referred to as Total
Product (TP) of the variable input.
Suppose capital is fixed at 4 units. Now in the Table 3.1, we look at the column where
capital takes the value 4. As we move down along the column, we get the output values
for different values of labour. This is the total product of labour schedule with K2 = 4.
This is also sometimes called total return to or total physical product of the variable
input. This is shown again in the second column of table in 3.2
Once we have defined total product, it will be useful to define the concepts of average
product (AP) and marginal product (MP). They are useful in order to describe the
contribution of the variable input to the production process.
5
Average Product
Average product is defined as the output per unit of variable input. We calculate it as
APL=TPL/L
The last column of table 3.2 gives us a numerical example of average product of labour
(with capital fixed at 4) for the production function described in table 3.1. Values in this
column are obtained by dividing TP (column 2) by
L (Column 1).
Marginal Product
Marginal product of an input is defined as the change in output per unit of change in the
input when all other inputs are held constant. When capital is held constant, the
marginal product of labour is
=PL/L
Where, D represents the change of the variable. The third column of table 3.2 gives us a
numerical example of Marginal Product of labour (with capital fixed at 4) for the
production function described in table 3.1. Values in this column are obtained by
dividing change in TP by change in L. For example, when L changes from 1 to 2, TP
changes from 10 to 24.
Change in L = 1
Since inputs cannot take negative values, marginal product is undefined at zero level of
input employment. For any level of an input, the sum of marginal products of every
preceding unit of that input gives the total product. So, total product is the sum of
marginal products.
6
Average product of an input at any level of employment is the average of all marginal
products up to that level. Average and marginal products are often referred to as
average and marginal returns, respectively, to the variable input.
The three stages of production are characterized by the slopes, shapes, and
interrelationships of the total, marginal, and average product curves. The first stage is
characterized by a positive slope of the average product curve, ending at the
intersection between the average product and marginal product curves; the second
stage by continues up to the point in which the marginal product becomes negative, at
the peak of the total product curve; and the third stage exists over the range of in which
the total product curve is negatively sloped. In Stage I, average product is positive and
increasing. In Stage II, marginal product is positive, but decreasing. And in Stage III, total
product is decreasing.
7
Three Product Curves
Stage I
Short-run production Stage I arises due to increasing average product. As more of the
variable input is added to the fixed input, the marginal product of the variable input
increases. Most importantly, marginal product is greater than average product, which
causes average product to increase. This is directly illustrated by the slope of the
average product curve.
Consider these observations about the shapes and slopes of the three product curves in
Stage I.
8
Stage II
of the variable input decreases. Most important of all, Stage II is driven by the law of
diminishing marginal returns.
The three product curves reveal the following patterns in Stage II.
The total product curve has a decreasing positive slope. In other words, the slope
becomes flatter with each additional unit of variable input.
Marginal product is positive and the marginal product curve has a negative
slope. The marginal product curve intersects the horizontal quantity axis at the
end of Stage II.
Average product is positive and the average product curve has a negative slope.
The average product curve is at it’s a peak at the onset of Stage II. At this peak,
average product is equal to marginal product.
Stage III
The onset of Stage III results due to negative marginal returns. In this stage of short-run
production, the law of diminishing marginal returns causes marginal product to
decrease so much that it becomes negative.
Stage III production is most obvious for the marginal product curve, but is also indicated
by the total product curve.
The total product curve has a negative slope. It has passed its peak and is
heading down.
Marginal product is negative and the marginal product curve has a negative
slope. The marginal product curve has intersected the horizontal axis and is
moving down.
Average product remains positive but the average product curve has a negative
slope.