V19i05 01
V19i05 01
V19i05 01
2006). Without a doubt, water deficit stress is conditions (Arbona et al., 2005; Bai et al.,
one of the leading limitations to photosynthesis 2010). Moreover, hydrogel accumulation
and plant primary productivity (Elshibli et al., enhanced water retention characteristics of soils
2016). For that reason, the prompt and timely and results in the interruption and arrival of
evaluation of water status in plants through the permanent percentages of wilting under severe
use of physiological plant measurement sensors evaporation (Taylor and Halfacre, 1986).
(i.e. canopy temperature/reflectance, sap flow, In ornamental crop production good watering
stem variation) has proven useful in irrigation practice is an important factor for reducing
control (Seelig et al., 2009). leaching of nutrients. (Briggs et al., 1998; Lea-
Water is an important component for plant Cox and Ross, 2001; Tyler et al., 1996).
production and growth, water is available in soil Previous studies shows that these materials are
but leach down due to percolation depends on very functional under partial water conditions
soil types. By reducing percolation of water and (Wang and Gregg, 1990). Roots have the ability
more water availability for plant roots could be to extract water from the crystal bead and chain
achieved by adding some polymers. According of hydrogels (Ingram and Yeager, 1987).
to a study, the application of polymer Hydrogels has the ability to enhance soil
(polyacrylic acid) enhances soil water stable physico-chemical properties like structural
aggregate content by 17.27% averagely, density stability, water holding capacity and soil
reduced by 11.18%, and soil water holding productivity (Hedrick and Mowry, 1952;
capacity increased by 2.8 times (Feng, 2006). In Johnson, 1984; Guilherme et al. 2015).
1970s, super absorbent polymer was used for Good irrigation management is an important
the first time commercially, later on super best management practice in ornamental crop
absorbent polymer were used in sanitary production, reducing runoff of nutrient and
napkins in 1978 by Park Davis. European used pesticide-rich water from production sites
super absorbent polymer for the first time in a (Briggs et al., 1998; Lea-Cox and Ross, 2001;
baby diaper during 1982. The expansion of this Tyler et al., 1996). Better control of irrigation
material and research greatly led to the has other benefits as well as better plant quality,
development of ultra-thin baby more compact plants (Burnett and van Iersel,
diapers. Polymers are available in the form of 2008), and reduced damage from root
crystals or tiny beads by different names i.e., pathogens (Powell and Lindquist, 1997). In
root watering crystals, super absorbent order to overcome these problems, an
polymers and drought crystals are called experimental study was planned to check the
hydrogels, they have huge capacity of retaining response of sodium polyacrylate on
water and make it available accordingly when morphological and flower related attributes of
required by plants over time (Henderson and petunia plant with the following objectives: (i)
Hensley, 1985; Ingram and Yeager, 1987; to investigate the effect of different
Wang and Boogher, 1987; Wang and Gregg, concentration of sodium polyacrylate on quality
1990). flower production of petunia under stress
Scientists revealed that the addition of polymer condition (ii) to determine the best irrigation
into soil could increase the particle’s bonding interval in term of producing quality flower
force which is easy to disperse, and produce production.
larger aggregate structure, specifically the
aggregate ratio of particles larger than 1 mm MATERIALS AND METHODS
increased rapidly (Yuan Xuefeng, 2005).
Furthermore, it also enhances the growth and Experimental site and design
rooting of plants, as a result improves their An experiment entitled “Effect of sodium
quality and yield (Al-Darby, 1996). It might polyacrylate (hydrogel) on growth and quaity
retain the organic matter in the soil and has the flower production of Petunia under water
ability to adapt rapidly to an environment stress” was conducted at Ornamental Nursery,
characterized by alternating wet and dry Department of Horticulture, The University of
Agriculture Peshawar (34°01'22.1" North and selected plants and then their average were
71°28'43.0" East) during winter 2019. Complete calculated.
Randomized Design (CRD) with two factors
having three repetition were used during Statistical Procedure
experimentation. The treatments comprised of The data taken for different variable were
sodium polyacrylate ( SP0 (soil without sodium subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of
polyacrylate, SP1 (90% soil + 10% sodium Statistical software package (Statistix 8.1, Inc,
polyacrylate), SP2 (70% soil + 30% sodium Tallahassee FL, USA) suitable for Completely
polyacrylate) and SP3 (50% soil + 50% sodium Randomized Design and LSD test (P≤0.05)
polyacrylate)) and irrigation interval i.e. W0 were used for means comparision by using.
(half day), W1 (1day interval), W2 (2 days
interval) and W3 (3 days interval). Dry baby RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
diapers were dipped in container full of water
for 10 minutes to absorb water efficiently. Days to flowering
Socked hydrogel were taken from diaper and It is obvious from (Table 1) that Sodium
mixed into the soil with different polyacrylate and irrigation interval significantly
concentrations. The combination of soil was influenced days to flowering of petunia . The
Garden soil + Silt + Leaf mould at ratio 1:1:1. early flowering (11.58) was recorded in SP2
Pots were filled with mixed soil containing (70% soil + 30% sodium polyacrylate), while
hydrogel. Petunia seedlings were transferred more days (14.33) was observed in plant
from seedling pots to individual pots and each recieved 50% sodium polyacrylate + 50% soil
pot had different concentration of sodium medium. Regarding irrigation interval, petunia
polyacrylate (hydrogel) mixed with soil in plant received irrigation after 3 days interval
different ratios (Bouranis et al., 1995). produced earlier flowering (11.25), whereas
Data Collection maximum days to flowering (15.58) was
Data was collected on morphological and recorded in half day irrigation interval. (Table
flower related attributes of petunia.Number of 1). Early flower initiation in 3 days of irrigation
leaves and number of branches of each plant interval might be due to water stress which
were counted from randomly selected plants turns plant from vegetative growth to
and their average were calculated for five plants reproductive growth as result initiate early
from each replication in each treatment. The flower prodcution. Similar findings were also
height of plant was measured by measuring tape recorded by (Kiyotoshi, 2016) who reported
from soil to highest tip of the plant in that plant switch from vegetative growth to
centimeter and then means of each plant were reproductive due to stress condition.While using
calculated. Total days were counted from of more sodium polyacrylate resulted maximum
planting date to first flower, of five randomly vegetative growth due to more retention of
selected plants from each replication and their water by hydrogel.Similar results were also
average were calculated. After every 3rd day, observed by Anupama et al (2017) reported that
number of flower were counted of each 0.5% hydrogel, had fastest growth and reached
treatments, from first flowering till fading of the the transplantable stage in (18 days) as
plant and their means were interpreted. Flower compared to (control: 28 days). While at 1.0%
size data were measured with the help of ruler treatment seedling growth took 20 days, and
in centimeter from the five selected plants in treatment with 1.5% and 2.0% took 22 days in
each replication and average was calculated. In onion. The importance of water stress was also
the five randomly selected plants of each examined by Razmjoo et al. (2008), who found
treatment the root length was measured by that the number of flowers produced by
using measuring tape from the base of the root Matricaria chamomile decreased with long
to tip of the roots and means were calculated. interval irrigation. Similar effects of water
Water displacement method was used for stress on flower production have also been
calculation of root volume of randomly five observed in crops. Passioura (2006) observed
while lowest value of flower size (5.05 cm) was irrigation interval of 2 days compared to plant
observed in plant recieved (50% of sodium treated with 50% of sodium polyacrylate + 50%
polyacrylate+50% soil medium). Irrigation soil and irrigated twice a day attained minimum
interval after 3 days showed maximum flower root lenght (4.33cm) (Fıgure 2). The maximum
size (5.78 cm), whereas minimum flower size root length ware recorded by irrigation interval
(5.11 cm) was recorded by half day irrigation of 2 days might be due to sufficient water
interval, (Table 1). The interaction between availability to roots of the petunia plant. Similar
sodium polyacrylate and irrigation interval results were reported by Nelson (1998) who
revealed that maximum value of flower size stated that efficient irrigation management had
(6.40cm) was observed in using 30% of sodium affect not only preserve moisture, but also
polyacrylate + 70% soil with irrigation interval increase the root growth, plant growth and
of 3 days, While plant treated with 50% of affect plant quality in commercial
sodium polyacrylate + 50% soil and irrigated production.The plants that were planted in 50%
twice a day attained minimum flower size sodium polyacrylate had more water capability
(4.43cm) (Fıgure 2). Maximum flower size of but the results were minimum in the irrigation
petunia plant might be due to sufficient water interval twice a day, might be the reason of
availably to plant because plant takes nutrients excessive water. Similar studies reported that,
from soil through water and more nutrients due to excess irrigation, root growth might be
leads to increase the flower size. Similar limited or restricted by oxygen diffusion rate
findings were also recorded by Koksal (2011) while under limited irrigation, root growth and
who reported that nutrients are transported development may be less due to lack of water or
through water. While the 50% sodium high soil strength (Klepper, 1991). The
polyacrylate had more water but excessive hydrogel particles are also taken as “miniature
water leads to reduce the oxygen availability to water reservoir” in the soil and water will be
roots which directly affected the plant growth detached from these reservoirs upon the root
and flowers size. Similar findings were also mandate through osmotic pressure
reported by Anupama (2005) who reported that difference.10 Due to the respectable volume
chrysanthemum seedlings planted in soil mixed reduction of the hydrogel as water is released to
with hydrogel up to 0.5% wt/wt increased the the plant, hydrogel creates at intervals the soil,
flower size and number of flower as compared free pore volume providing further space for air
to control treatments. and water infiltration, storage and root growth
(Miliani et al., 2017).
Root Length (cm)
The analysis of data showed that root length Root Volume (ml)
was significantly influenced by sodium The analysis of data showed that root volume
polyacrylate, irrigation interval and their was significantly influenced by sodium
interactions (Table 1). Among the different polyacrylate, irrigation and interactions of both
concentrations, longer root (10.42) was (Table 1). Among the different concentrations,
observed SP1 (90% soil + 10% sodium maximum root volume (1.14 ml), was observed
polyacrylate), while minimum root length in SP1 (90% soil + 10% sodium polyacrylate)
(7.17cm) was noticed in SP1 (50% soil + 50% ,while minimum root length (0.97 ml) was
sodium polyacrylate). Regarding irrigation, noticed in SP3 (50% soil + 50% sodium
maximum root length (10.25 cm) was observed polyacrylate). Regarding irrigation, maximum
by applying irrigation after 2 days, while root length (1.10 ml) was observed by applying
minimum root length (7.50 cm) was recorded irrigation after 2 days, while minimum root
by applying irrigation twice a day (Table 1). length (0.84 ml) was recorded by applying
The interaction between sodium polyacrylate irrigation twice a day (Table 1). The interaction
and irrigation interval revealed that maximum between sodium polyacrylate and irrigation
length of root (12 cm) was observed in using interval revealed that maximum root volume
10% of sodium polyacrylate + 90% soil with (1.33ml) was observed in using 10% of sodium
prolonging the survival of Pinus Landis, T.D and D.L. Haase. 2012. Applications
halepensis seedlings subjected to of Hydrogels in the Nursery and During
drought. Soil and Tillage Research. Out planting. USDA Forest Service
50(3-4): 295-304. Proceedings, RMRS-P-68.
Huttermann, A., M. Zommorodi and K. Reise. Lawrence J.B., H. Agaba, G.E John, M. Worbes
1999. Addition of hydrogels to soil for and A. Huttermann. 2013. Effects of
prolonging the survival of Pinus Hydrogels on Tree Seedling
halepensis seedlings subjected to Performance in Temperate Soils before
drought. Soil and Tillage Research. 50: and after Water Stress. J. Environ.
295-304. Protection. 4: 713-721.
Ingram, D.L. and T.H Yeager. 1987. Effect of Lea-Cox, J., D.S. Ross. 2001. A review of the
irrigation frequency and a water federal clean water act and the Maryland
absorbing polymer amendment on water quality improvement act: The
Ligustrum growth and moisture rational for developing a water and
retention by a container medium. J. nutrient management planning process
Environ. Hort., 5: 19-21. for container nursery and greenhouse
Jan MT, Shah P, Hollington PA, Khan MJ & operations. J. Environ. Hort. 19: 226-
Sohail Q (2009. Agriculture Research: 229.
Design and Analysis. Dept. of Manassah, J.T., E.J. Briskey, R.P. Upchurch.
Agronomy, KPK Agric. Uni. Peshawar, 1981. New crops (Guar, Jojoba,
Pakistan. Plantago, Chassava, Agave and
Johnson, M.S. 1984. Effect of soluble salts on Guayula) for arid and semiarid lands.
water absorption by gel-forming soil Field crop. Abst. Q-35-70 (90): 3796.
conditioners. Journal of the Science of Marc, W.V.I., S. Dove. 2010 Department of
Food and Agriculture. 35: 1063-1066. Horticulture, University of Georgia,
Keever, G.J., G.S. Cobb, J.C. Stephenson, and 1111 Miller Plant Sciences Building,
W.J. Foster. 1989. Effect of hydrophilic Athens, GA, 30602.
polymeramendment on growth of Maria, T.C.B., A. Rodrigues, F.C. Rosa, M.
container grown landscape plants. J. Casquilho. 2014. Application of
Environ. Hort. 7: 52-56. Superabsorbent Polymers to minimize
Khadem, S.A., M. Galavi, M. Ramrodi. 2010. soil water stress. Department of
Effect of animal manure and super Chemical Engineering (DEQ), Instituto
absorbent polymer on corn leaf relative Superior Técnico, Universidade de
water content, cell membrane stability Lisboa.
and leaf chlorophyll content under dry Mc Daniel, R.G. 1985. Field evaluation of
condition. Australian J of Crop Sci. 4(8): agave parryi and A. Americana in
642-647. Arizona. Univ. of Arizona, Tucson,
Kiyotoshi, T. 2016. Stress-induced flowering: U.S.A. Desert plant Dept, Ornamental
the third category of flowering Horti. Abst. (ISHS). 126: 311-
response. Journal of Experimental 320.
Botany. 67(17): 4925-4934. Milani, P., França, D, Balieiro, AG et al. 2017.
Klepper, B. 1991. Crop root system response Polymers and its applications in
to irrigation. Irrig Sci (1991) 12: 105. agriculture. Polímeros. 27(3): 256-266.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192280. Nelson, P.V. 1998. Greenhouse operation and
Koksal, A., I.H. Tuzel, D. Buyuktas. 2011. The management. 5th ed. Prentice Hall,
effects of different irrigation levels on Upper Saddle River, NJ.
flowering and flower quality of Nemali, K.S., M.W. Van Iersel. 2008.
carnation (Dianthus caryophllus L.) Physiological responses to different
irrigated by drip irrigation. African J. substrate water contents: Screening for
Biotechnol. 10(66): 14826-14835. high water-use efficiency in bedding
Trisha, R., S. Kumar., L. Chand, D.M. Kadam, yield and growth analysis of Soybean
B. Bihari, S.S. Shrimali, R. Bishnoi, (Glycine max L.) under drought stress
U.K. Maurya, M. Singh, M. condition. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 10(23):
Muruganandam, L. Singh, S.K. Sharma, 4190-4196.
R. Kumar, A. Mallik. 2019. Impact of Yun, X.F., Y.K. Wang. 2015. Effects and
Pusa hydrogel application on yield and mechanism of PAM on soil physical
productivity of rainfed wheat in North characteristics. J. Soil and Water
West Himalayan region. Current Conservation. 19(2): 37-40.
Science. 116(7): 10.
Viero, P.W.M., K.M. Little, D.G. Oscroft. 2000.
The effect of a soil-amended hydrogel
on the establishment of Eucalyptus
grandis x E. Camaldulensis clone grown
on the sandy soils of Zululand. South
African Foresty Journal. 188(21): 28.
Wang, Y.T., L.L. Gregg. 1990. Hydrophilic
polymers-their response to amendments
and effect on properties of a soil less
potting mix. Journal of American
Society for Hortic Sci. 115: 943-948.
Water, L.D.J. 2009. The effect of hydrogel
additives on the water retention curve of
sandy soil from forest nursery in Julinek.
J. water and land development. 13a:
239-247.
Yazdani, F., Allahdadi, I., Akbari, G.A. 2007.
Impact of superabsorbent polymer on
Table 1. Growth and flower production related traits of petunia as influenced by sodium
polyacrylate and irrigation intervals
Treat Days to No. of No. of Plant No. of Flower Root Root
ment flowerin leaves leaves height flowers size length volume
s g plant-1 plant-1 (cm) plant-1 (cm) (cm) (ml)
Sodium polyacrylate (%)
(S.P)
Cont
14.00ab 37.08b 3.92b 17.08bc 13.58bc 5.32b 9.00b 0.88b
rol
10 13.00b 41.83a 4.58a 19.33a 15.83ab 5.74a 10.42a 1.14a
20 11.58c 41.25a 4.42a 18.50ab 16.17a 5.77a 10.08a 1.09a
30 14.33a 24.42c 3.75b 16.08c 12.67c 5.05b 7.17c 0.79b
LSD≤
0.84 2.82 0.43 0.89 1.70 0.20 0.81 0.06
0.05
Irrigation intervals (days)
(I.I)
Twic
e a 15.58ab 28.58 3.25 15.08c 11.00c 5.11c 7.50 0.84c
day
1 13.58b 32.75c 4.25 17.17b 14.08b 5.38 8.92b 0.95bc
2 12.50c 45.67a 4.83 20.25a 16.08b 5.61 10.25a 1.10a
3 11.25a 37.58b 4.33 18.50b 17.08 5.78a 10.00a 1.01ab
LSD≤
0.84 2.82 0.43 0.89 1.70 0.20 0.81 0.06
0.05
Interaction
S.P×I
NS Figure 1 Figure 1 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 2 Figure 2 Figure 2
.I
70 7
(A) Twice a day
(B) Twice a day
1 1
60 6 2
2
3
-1
3
Number of branches plant
-1
Number of leaves plant
50 5
40 4
30 3
20 2
10 1
0 0
0 10% 30% 50% 0 10% 30% 50%
Sodium polyacrylate (% ) Sodium polyacrylate (% )
25
Twice a day
(C)
1
2
20 3
Plant height (cm)
15
10
0
0 10% 30% 50%
Sodium polycrylate (% )
25 8
Twice a day (A) Twice a day
(B)
1
1
2
20 2
3
3
-1
6
Number of flowers plant
10
2
5
0 0
0 10% 30% 50% 0 10% 30% 50%
0,8
6
0,6
4
0,4
2
0,2
0 0,0
0 10% 30% 50% 0 10% 30% 50%
Sodium polyacrylate (%) Sodium polyacrylate (%)