Offshore Spaceports May 2023
Offshore Spaceports May 2023
Offshore Spaceports May 2023
Offshore Spaceports
May 2023
REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING
OFFSHORE SPACEPORTS
MAY 2023
This document is applicable to offshore spaceports of the following types: barge-type units, column-
stabilized units, offshore installations, and self-elevating units.
A class notation will be offered to a new construction or an existing vessel converted to an offshore
spaceport. The notation will be:
The intended service (recovery, launch, or both recovery and launch) and hull type will be included in the
notation.
The requirements for the autonomous and/or remote control systems of the onboard machinery and
equipment are associated with the AUTONOMOUS and/or REMOTE-CON notations. If the remote
control operations are limited to dynamic positioning (DP) system during recovery and/or launching
operation, a specific set of requirements is provided in 4/6.1, which is a subset of ABS Requirements for
Autonomous and Remote Control Functions.
This document is to be used in conjunction with the following ABS Rules and Guides, as well as
applicable Statutory Regulations:
● ABS Rules for Building and Classing of Steel Barges (Barge Rules)
● ABS Rules for Building and Classing Mobile Offshore Units (MOU Rules)
● ABS Rules for Building and Classing Offshore Installations (Offshore Installations Rules)
● ABS Guide for Dynamic Positioning Systems (DPS Guide)
● ABS Requirements for Autonomous and Remote Control Functions
This document becomes effective on the first day of the month of publication.
Users are advised to check periodically on the ABS website www.eagle.org to verify that this version of
this document is the most current.
OFFSHORE SPACEPORTS
CONTENTS
SECTION 1 General..................................................................................................5
1 Application...................................................................................... 5
2 Classification...................................................................................5
2.1 Scope.................................................................................6
2.2 Classification Symbols and Notations................................6
2.3 Optional Class Notations................................................... 7
2.4 Administration Requirements.............................................8
3 Risk Evaluations for Alternative Arrangements and Novel
Features..........................................................................................8
4 Hazard Identification (HAZID).........................................................8
5 Submission of Plans and Design Data........................................... 9
5.1 Hull, Design Data and Calculations................................... 9
5.2 Machinery Plans................................................................ 9
5.3 Additional Plans................................................................. 9
6 Operating Manual........................................................................... 9
7 Definitions..................................................................................... 10
7.1 Spacecraft........................................................................10
7.2 Offshore Spaceport..........................................................10
7.3 Launch Vehicle................................................................ 10
7.4 Reentry Vehicle................................................................10
7.5 Barge-Type Unit...............................................................10
7.6 Column-Stabilized Unit.................................................... 10
7.7 Offshore Installation......................................................... 11
7.8 Self-Elevating Unit........................................................... 11
7.9 Self-Propelled Unit........................................................... 11
7.10 Non-Self-Propelled Unit................................................... 11
8 Abbreviations and References......................................................11
8.1 Abbreviations................................................................... 11
8.2 References.......................................................................11
ABS REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING AND CLASSING OFFSHORE SPACEPORTS • 2023 iii
1 General......................................................................................... 13
2 Materials for the Launching and Recovery Area...........................13
3 Materials for Cryogenic Tanks...................................................... 13
SECTION 5 Surveys............................................................................................... 22
1 Surveys During Construction........................................................ 22
1.1 General............................................................................ 22
2 Surveys After Construction........................................................... 22
2.1 General............................................................................ 22
2.2 Annual Surveys................................................................22
2.3 Special Periodical Surveys (Every 5 Years).....................23
2.4 Additional Surveys (after each Launch and/or
Recovery)........................................................................ 23
1 Application
This document applies to offshore spaceports defined in 1/7.2 primarily intended for spacecraft testing,
launching and/or recovery offshore. The following types of offshore spaceports are covered by this
document:
i) Barge-Type Units
ii) Column-Stabilized Units
iii) Offshore Installations
iv) Self-Elevating Units
Other types of offshore spaceports and floating site-specific spaceports will be considered by ABS on a
case-by-case basis.
2 Classification
The requirements for conditions of classification are contained in the separate, generic ABS Rules for
Conditions of Classification – Offshore Units and Structures (Part 1).
Additional requirements specific to offshore spaceports are contained in the following Sections. Generally,
the “core” vessel is to be designed with the applicable requirements for the specific vessel type.
Specifically:
● ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Barges (Barge Rules) for Barge-Type Units
● ABS Rules for Building and Classing Mobile Offshore Units (MOU Rules) for Column-Stabilized
Units and Self-Elevating Units
● ABS Rules for Building and Classing Offshore Installations (Offshore Installations Rules) for
Offshore Installations
The requirements for the “core” (or “base”) vessels in the listed Rules for submittals, materials, design,
construction, and surveys are to be complied with where applicable. Additional requirements for spaceport
specific structures, machinery, and equipment are listed in Section 3 and Section 4 of this document.
Note:
If a Barge-Type spaceport is self-propelled, the design of hull structure and machinery, equipment, and systems that are
normally on barges follows the Barge Rules, while the design of propulsion machinery and special equipment and systems
that are normally not on barges follows the MOU Rules.
2.1 Scope
The classification of an offshore spaceport addresses two major elements which are subject to the
requirements of this document:
i) Hull structure
ii) Onboard machinery, equipment, and systems that are not part of the spacecraft systems
Structural loads and safety hazards due to the presence of the spacecraft system are to be considered for
offshore spaceports. Classification of additional equipment and systems may be offered if requested by the
Owner.
This document has been developed around unmanned launch and recovery operations on the spaceport. If
the spaceport will be manned during launch and/or recovery operations, additional considerations
regarding personal safety are required and will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
The Maltese Cross, ✠, symbol is assigned to offshore spaceports for which the hull construction and/or the
manufacture of its machinery and components and any associated required testing, as applicable, is carried
out under ABS survey. For offshore spaceports constructed under survey of another recognized
Classification Society or Authority, the Maltese Cross, ✠, symbol will be omitted from the hull and/or
machinery classification notations.
The intended service for recovery and/or launch is included in the notation, and the relevant
requirements provided in this document are to be complied with. The service notation will be
appended by one of the following (Barge-Type), (Column-Stabilized), (Offshore
Installation), or (Self-Elevating) to indicate the hull type. The hull structural configurations of
these units are described in Subsection 1/7.
notations as described in 1/2.2.1 and the following Sections but omitting the symbol ✠ signifying
survey during construction.
Propulsion machinery and systems used for short field moves of non-self-propelled offshore
spaceports and complying with the requirements of the MOU Rules as applied to self-propelled
offshore spaceports manufactured and installed under ABS survey and found satisfactory after
trials will be distinguished in the ABS Record by the notation ✠ AMS-NP, as appropriate. See
also 3-1-1/1.7 of the MOU Rules.
A listing of Classification Symbols and Notations available to the Owners may be viewed and downloaded
from the ABS website: http://www.eagle.org. This Section introduces notations that may be applicable for
offshore spaceports.
When requested by the Owner, position (pre-laid) mooring systems, position (pre-laid) mooring
equipment, pre-laid mooring system with automatic position control system, and/or pre-laid
mooring system with manual position control system are to be in accordance with the
requirements for the class notation (P-PL), (M-PL), TAM-PL and/or TAM-PL (Manual),
respectively (see Section 5 of the ABS Requirements for Position Mooring Systems).
Approval of structural fire protection, fire extinguishing systems, and/or stability of the offshore spaceport
by a National Administration may be considered as complying with the class requirements provided such
approval can be satisfactorily documented.
Risk evaluations for the justification of alternative arrangements or novel features may be applicable either
to the offshore spaceport as a whole or to individual systems, subsystems, or components. ABS will
consider the application of risk evaluations for alternative arrangements and novel features for offshore
spaceports. Portions of the offshore spaceport or any of its components not explicitly included in the risk
evaluation submitted to ABS are to comply with any applicable parts of the ABS Rules and Guides. If any
proposed alternative arrangement or novel feature affects any applicable requirements of a flag or Coastal
State, it is the responsibility of the Owner to discuss with the applicable authorities the acceptance of
alternatives based on risk evaluations.
For new or novel concepts, (i.e., applications or processes that have no previous experience in the
environment being proposed), the guidance encompassed in the class Rules may not be directly applicable
to them. The ABS Guidance Notes on Review and Approval of Novel Concepts offers ABS clients a
methodology for requesting classification of a novel concept. The process described in those Guidance
Notes draws upon engineering, testing, and risk assessments to determine if the concept provides
acceptable levels of safety in line with current industry practices.
where a combination or sequence of events could lead to undesirable consequences (property damage,
personnel safety, and environmental damage), with consideration given to all reasonably foreseeable
causes. ABS participation in this HAZID study is required.
The identified risk control options (prevention and mitigation measures) deemed necessary to be
implemented are to be considered part of the design basis of the offshore spaceport.
2/2.4 of the ABS Guidance Notes on Risk Assessment Applications for the Marine and Offshore Industries
provides guidance on hazard identification techniques.
The Hazard Identification (HAZID) report in accordance with Subsection 1/4 is to be submitted for review.
● Section 1-1-7/1 and 1-5-4/1 of the ABS Rules for Conditions of Classification (Part 1) for barge-type
units
● Section 3-1-2 and 5-1-1/1.9 of the MOU Rules for column-stabilized units and self-elevating units
● Section 1-1-4 and 3-1-1/3 of the Offshore Installations Rules for offshore installations
● Section 1-1-7/3 of the ABS Rules for Conditions of Classification – Offshore Units and Structures
(Part 1) for barge-type units and offshore installations
● Section 4-1-1/5, 4-2-1/7, 4-3-1/5, and 5-2-1/3 of the MOU Rules for column-stabilized units and self-
elevating units.
6 Operating Manual
The Operating Manual of the offshore spaceport is to be submitted for review by ABS to verify that
operational procedures and conditions are consistent with the design information, criteria, and limitations
considered in the classification. ABS is not responsible for the launch vehicle operation of the spaceport,
and users are to comply with their licensing authority for flight and ground safety.
A copy of the Operating Manual is preferably to be stored on board the offshore spaceport. Alternatively,
the Operating Manual may be retained in a location accessible by operating personnel (e.g., control room
on a vessel or onshore) and made readily available to the ABS Surveyor and to service personnel prior to
conducting any maintenance or inspection.
Insofar as classification is concerned, the Operating Manual for the offshore spaceport is to include the
information in accordance with Section 1-2-5 of the ABS Rules for Conditions of Classification – Offshore
Units and Structures (Part 1), as appropriate. Spaceport specialized systems, such as launching, recovery,
prepping, and storage/securing of spacecraft and storage of propellants and cryogenics, are to be included.
ABS review of spaceport specialized systems included in an Operating Manual will be limited to
confirming that operational procedure and conditions guidance for the installed systems is included in the
Operating Manual, however the assessment of the adequacy and sufficiency of the spaceport specialized
systems procedures and conditions is the responsibility of the licensing authority and these procedures will
not be assessed or approved by ABS.
Details regarding the manning are to be part of the Operating Manual. This is to include the overall
manning approach for the offshore spaceport and is to specifically indicate when and how many people
will be on board as well as details of the PPE provided on board.
The Operating Manual required by this Subsection does not need to be in addition to that required by the
coastal State or other governmental authorities. These administrations may require that additional
information be included in the Operating Manual.
7 Definitions
7.1 Spacecraft
A spacecraft is a vehicle or machine designed to fly beyond the Karman line.
The declaration of the unit as non-self-propelled is to be requested by the Owner, specified in the contract
between the Owner and the builder, and confirmed by ABS and the flag Administration.
8.1 Abbreviations
ABS American Bureau of Shipping
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers
DP Dynamic Positioning
FEA Finite Element Analysis
FMEA Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
HAZID Hazard Identification
IMO International Maritime Organization
MARPOL International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution
MODU Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit
MOU Mobile Offshore Unit
LSA Life-Saving Appliance
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
UPS Uninterruptible Power Supply
8.2 References
The latest editions of the following ABS documents and industry standards are applicable and referenced
in this document.
ABS Rules for Conditions of Classification – Offshore Units and Structures (Part 1)
ABS Rules for Building and Classing Marine Vessels (Marine Vessel Rules)
ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Barges (Barge Rules)
ABS Rules for Building and Classing Mobile Offshore Units (MOU Rules)
ABS Rules for Building and Classing Offshore Installations (Offshore Installations Rules)
ABS Guidance Notes on Risk Assessment Applications for the Marine and Offshore Industries
1 General
The materials and welding used for the construction of offshore spaceports are to meet the requirements in
the Part 2 of the core rules, specifically,
● ABS Rules for Materials and Welding (Part 2) for barge-type units, column-stabilized units, and self-
elevating units.
● Part 2 of the Offshore Installations Rules for fixed offshore installations
All materials are to be suitable for the intended service conditions and are to be of the quality defined by a
recognized specification, and free of injurious imperfections.
The following additional requirements apply depending on the structure type of the offshore spaceport:
● Section 3-1-2/1, 3-1-2/3, 3-1-2/5, and 3-2-12 of the Barge Rules for barge-type units
● Section 3-1-4 and 3-2-6 of the MOU Rules for column-stabilized units and self-elevating units
Mill certificates are acceptable for materials for the launching and recovery area. ABS Surveyor witnesses
sample testing for each heat number to confirm the mechanical properties of the materials.
1 General
The hull design and construction of offshore spaceports are to be in accordance with the applicable
requirements in the following ABS Rules.
The launching/landing loads are to be considered in the global and local finite element analysis (FEA) for
the launching/landing structure. Launching/landing loads are to be calculated using an acceptable
approach. For FEA, 3-2-20/1 through 3-2-20/9.1 of the Marine Vessel Rules is to be followed, and the
stress limits for static and dynamic loads may be used, as applicable.
The liquid fuel storage for spacecraft, and the weight and the center of gravity of the rocket are to be
included in the stability assessment of the offshore spaceport.
● All materials that comprise the muster stations routes are to be of steel or equivalent material.
● The muster station is to be of sufficient area to accommodate the number of personnel to be gathered.
● The muster station is to be located in a safe location.
● The muster station may be a meeting room inside the accommodations or may be part of the lifeboat
embarkation station.
Escape route paths are to be properly identified and provided with adequate lighting.
An escape route plan is to be prominently displayed at various points in the facility or is to be included in
the Fire Control or Fire/Safety Plan and submitted as one of the submittals listed in Subsection 1/5.
Offshore spaceports are to comply with the applicable provisions of the International Life-Saving
Appliance (LSA) Code on lifeboats, rafts, and vests during manned operations or the following
requirements at a minimum. The locations of life-saving appliances are to be protected from blast and heat
from the launching/landing pad.
4.3.1 Lifeboats
Lifeboats of an approved type are to be provided, with a total capacity to accommodate twice the
total number of people on board the offshore spaceport. The lifeboats are required to be installed
on at least two (2) sides of the offshore spaceport, in which there will be accommodation for
100%, in case one of the stations becomes inoperable. Alternatively, for ship-type units, free-fall
lifeboats with aggregate capacity to accommodate the total number of persons on board, where
provided, are subject to acceptance by the flag Administration. The lifeboats are to be stowed in a
secure and sheltered position and protected from damage by fire and explosion.
4.3.2 Liferafts
Inflatable liferafts of an approved type are to be provided on board such that their total capacity is
sufficient to accommodate the total number of people expected to be on board the offshore
spaceport. Liferafts are to be placed in or next to areas where personnel may be working, in
sufficient quantity to hold the maximum number of people that might be present in the area at any
one (1) time. The liferafts are to be stowed in a secure and sheltered position and protected from
damage by fire and explosion.
The liferafts for self-elevating spaceports should be davit launching type unless two access/exit
gangways are located near liferaft store location and can reach to the water surface so that the
people on board can embark to liferafts when the self-elevating spaceport is in elevated mode.
The design basis/philosophy of an offshore spaceport are to be provided to ABS for review and are to be
aligned with the applicable fire safety requirements in the MOU Rules, such as
1 General Requirements
Machinery, equipment, and systems that support marine operations are to be in accordance with the
applicable requirements of:
● Part 4 and Section 3-3-1 of the Barge Rules for barge-type units
● Part 4 and Part 6 of the MOU Rules for column-stabilized units, offshore installation, and self-
elevating units.
If a system is serving marine operations and offshore spaceport operations (e.g., hydraulic power to
offshore spaceport operations, cooling systems, etc.), the design criteria of the system is to meet the above
requirements, as applicable. If a part of the system serves only offshore spaceport operation and can be
isolated from the part serving marine operations, other recognized industrial standards or manufacturer
standards may be applied to that part of the system up to but not including the isolating valve.
3 Electrical Systems
Electrical equipment and systems are to be in accordance with the applicable requirements of:
If a system is serving marine operations and offshore spaceport operations (e.g., power supply to offshore
spaceports), the design criteria of the system is to meet the above requirements, as applicable. If a part of
the system serves only offshore spaceport operation and can be isolated from the part serving marine
operations, other recognized industrial standards or manufacturer standards may be applied to that part of
the system up to but not including the isolating circuit.
Controls, displays, and alarms are to provide for safe and reliable performance of all the required functions
carried out from the control station.
When control of the onboard machinery, equipment, and systems is possible from more than one control
location, control is to be possible only from one control location at a time, except for those safety related
functions (emergency shutdown, etc.). A clear method to transfer control between stations is to be
provided. At each control location, there is to be an indicator showing which location is in control. Means
of communication are to be provided between the central control station and the local control stations for
the onboard machinery, equipment, and systems. Communication systems are to be installed to minimize
disturbances or interference generated by foreign sources of energy.
● 3-4-1/3 and 6-1-10/3 of the MOU Rules for temporary mooring equipment
● ABS Requirements for Position Mooring Systems for mooring systems, if any
i) During recovery and/or launching operations, the spaceport is operated using DP system and is
remotely controlled.
ii) Support vessels are on standby and are at a safe distance from the spaceport.
iii) No marine traffic is nearby in launch and landing operations hazard zone.
iv) Comply with coastal state/federal regulations and flag agreement.
i) Requirements pertaining to remote operator training and qualifications do not fall under the
purview of ABS. The flag Administration is to be consulted for instructions and guidance on the
minimum qualification and training requirements of these operators. The competence
requirements of the operators are to be defined and documented in the Operating Manual.
ii) Computer and communication systems are to be supplied power from uninterruptible power
supply (UPS). In the event of a loss of power, the UPS is to have sufficient power for operations
of the remote control function to safely terminate and successfully transfer control to an onboard
operator or to transition to a safe state. Calculations and justifications in this regard are to be
submitted to ABS for review. Loss of power and transfer of power to the UPS is to be alarmed at
the remote control station and on board the spaceport.
iii) Alarms requiring the attention of the remote operator are to be provided with visual and audible
alarms.
iv) The remote operator is to be provided with a sufficient level of situational awareness of the
operations being carried out by the function on board the spaceport. The level of situational
awareness required is dependent on the nature of the operations.
v) Live visual feed of the operations being carried out by the function on board the spaceport is to be
provided at the remote control station. In the case of partial or full failure of video feeds, the
operator is to have demonstrably effective backup operational capabilities for situational
awareness and decision support.
8 Lifting Appliances
The lifting appliances (cranes), if in the class scope, are to be in accordance with the applicable
requirements of the Lifting Appliance Guide, including offshore recovery of crewed capsules and fairings
as well as personnel and material transfer.
The cryogenic tanks are to be in accordance with the applicable requirements of recognized pressure vessel
standards such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) VIII, as well as additional Class
requirements and statutory regulations. Materials used in cryogenic tanks are to comply with the
requirements of Subsection 2/3 of this document. Safety measures are to be taken to prevent structure
damage occurring from cryogenic liquid leaks, spills, or drips. Valves are to be designed to be suitable for
cryogenic service to prevent leaks at low ambient temperatures. Safety procedures are to be in place for
personnel handling cryogenic fluids.
All pipelines, hoses, or components which may be isolated in a liquid full condition, or where liquid may
accumulate, are to be protected by relief valves. The outlet from these pressure relief valves is to be led to
the cryogenic tanks. Alternatively, they may discharge to the vent mast if means are provided to detect and
dispose of any liquid cargo which may flow into the vent system.
Personnel on board are to be safeguarded from any hydrocarbon or toxic propellant release.
Fire extinguishing systems are to be provided for each cryogenic tank area in accordance with Part 5 of the
MOU Rules, as applicable.
11 Removable Equipment
Removable equipment is not a permanent part of an offshore spaceport and is intended to be removed after
a finite period of time (e.g., pre-service stage, spacecraft launch/recovery stage). Removable equipment
can present new hazards to the offshore spaceport during its installation, use, and removal. The use of the
removable equipment and its location are to be accounted for in the risk analyses so that potential hazards
due to use of the removable equipment are identified, assessed, and controlled. Temporarily revised
management and control arrangements for safe operation and maintenance of removable equipment are to
be established and implemented. Specification of interface on board for the removable equipment is to be
sufficiently detailed.
1.1 General
Surveys during construction of offshore spaceports are to be in accordance with the core Rules listed in
Subsection 1/2, as applicable.
2.1 General
Surveys after construction of offshore spaceports are to be in accordance with the core Rules listed in
Subsection 1/2 and the ABS Rules for Survey After Construction (Part 7), as applicable.
i) Examination of any critical structure identified during design review and HAZID workshop, as
applicable.
ii) Operational test of all emergency stops, controls, and remote controls.
iii) Review of calibration record, Operating Manual defined in Subsection 1/6, and logbooks.
iv) Examination and testing of fire/safety alarms and detectors.
v) Testing of all means of communication, including internal, external, and spacecraft-to-spaceport
communication.
vi) Examination of all piping systems.
vii) Functional tests of equipment integrated or associated with the spaceport’s systems.
viii) Examination and testing of electrical systems and related equipment.
ix) Operational test of all spaceport equipment alarms.
x) Onboard PPE is to be provided in sufficient quantities as determined by the HAZID study (see
Subsection 1/4) and specified in the Operating Manual (see Subsection 1/6). PPE is to be
examined in order to confirm it is in suitable condition and not expired or in need of periodic
servicing.
xi) Examination and testing of the Remote Operator Station (for Autonomous functions with
Operations Supervision Levels RO1, RO2 or RO3) and/or the Remote Control Station (for Remote
Control functions). Testing involving the Remote Operator Station or Remote Control Station
arrangements are to be conducted in conjunction with the spaceport in the presence of attending
Surveyors at both the spaceport and the Remote Operator Station or Remote Control Station.
Refer to Section 7-9-38 of the ABS Rules for Survey After Construction (Part 7) for details.
xii) Examination and testing of the Thrusters and Dynamic Positioning Systems (PAS, APS, DPS-0,
DSP-1, DPS-2, DPS-3), arrangements are to be conducted in conjunction with the spaceport in the
presence of attending Surveyors. Refer to Section 7-9-6 of the ABS Rules for Survey After
Construction (Part 7) for details.
xiii) Compliance with any special requirements from the flag Administration, local codes, or
regulations.
i) Examination of structure and hull connection weld points, supplemented by NDT of the
connection welds for items identified in 5/2.2i).
ii) Examination of electrical equipment wiring, wireways, junction boxes, and electrical panels for
damage, corrosion, or loose connections.
iii) Examination and testing of insulation resistance of cables related to autonomous and remote
control systems. Refer to Section 7-9-38 of the ABS Rules for Survey After Construction (Part 7)
for details.
iv) Calibration of essential safety alarms, detectors, and equipment.
v) Onboard PPE is to be provided in sufficient quantities as determined by the HAZID study (see
Subsection 1/4) and specified in the Operating Manual (see Subsection 1/6). PPE is to be
examined in order to confirm it is in suitable condition and not expired or in need of periodic
servicing.
vi) Examination and testing of the Remote Operator Station (for Autonomous functions with
Operations Supervision Levels RO1, RO2 or RO3) and/or the Remote Control Station (for Remote
Control functions). Testing involving the Remote Operator Station or Remote Control Station
arrangements are to be conducted in conjunction with the spaceport in the presence of attending
Surveyors at both the spaceport and the Remote Operator Station or Remote Control Station.
Refer to Section 7-9-38 of the ABS Rules for Survey After Construction (Part 7) for details.
vii) Examination and testing of the Thrusters and Dynamic Positioning Systems (PAS, APS, DPS-0,
DSP-1, DPS-2, DPS-3), arrangements are to be conducted in conjunction with the spaceport in the
presence of attending Surveyors. Refer to Section 7-9-6 of the ABS Rules for Survey After
Construction (Part 7) for details.