FDGG
FDGG
Design of digital coding metasurfaces with independent controls of phase and amplitude
responses
Applied Physics Letters 113, 063502 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5043520
© 2018 Author(s).
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 113, 091601 (2018)
An electromagnetic (EM) metasurface is an artificial type and whose encoding was based on the phase response
structure that comprises subwavelength elements arranged of the EM wave. However, as well as the phase of an EM
periodically or nonperiodically on a two-dimensional sur- wave, its amplitude is also an important property; many use-
face. Because of the unusual EM response at its surface,1–4 a ful structures and devices can be realized by manipulating
metasurface can exert powerful control over the phase and the amplitude, such as frequency-selective surfaces,35–38
amplitude of the EM waves. Also, because a metasurface absorbers,39–41 radomes,42,43 and low-sidelobe antennas.44,45
is extremely thin, its inherent loss is low and it avoids the Herein, we present a tunable digital coding metasurface
fabrication and assembly problems associated with three- for dynamic control of the transmission state of EM waves
dimensional metamaterials. Because of the aforementioned by tuning the external illumination. By remotely tuning the
properties, metasurfaces have attracted much attention in illumination intensity or shifting the frequency of the inci-
recent eight years.5–9 Some functional devices and systems dent wave, the digital metasurface can achieve free switches
have been realized based on metasurfaces, such as flat of the transmission status of the EM waves. We design a dig-
lenses,10–13 focusing and scattering screens,14,15 polar- ital element and verify it with full-wave simulation, and we
izers,16–18 imaging systems,19–21 and other exciting applica- also fabricate and measure a digital metasurface comprising
tions.22–28 However, most previously reported metasurfaces 15 15 designed elements.
cannot be controlled or tuned freely; their functions are fixed To realize the aforementioned transmissive digital coding
once they have been fabricated. Therefore, a challenge metasurface that can be tuned by illumination or the frequency
remains to realize multi-functional or reconfigurable EM of the incident wave, we propose and design the digital ele-
devices. ment shown in Fig. 1(a). A circular-ring gap with inner radius
Digital codings “0” and “1” have been adopted innova- r is excavated on the top copper layer, and a varactor diode is
tively to denote the corresponding unit cells with different loaded inside the gap to connect the inner copper patch and
phase responses of EM waves, and these have been used to outer copper layer. In the center of the element, a metallic via
design digital coding and programmable metasurfaces.29 An connects the inner circular copper patch to the bottom copper
external signal can be used to control the states of the struc- ground line, which is arranged in the x direction. To control
tural elements on a digital metasurface. Therefore, the func- the wave transmission of the element dynamically with exter-
tion of a digital metasurface can be altered in real time by nal illumination, we use a silicon PIN photodiode series array
changing its control signal dynamically.30–33 With some to provide a direct-current (DC) reverse voltage for tuning the
complicated systems, there is a need for remote-control non- capacitance (CT) of the embedded varactor in real time, as
contact tuning, and this has led to another class of tunable shown in Fig. 1(a).
metasurfaces being proposed, namely, the frequency coding To investigate the transmission characteristics of the
metasurface.34 By changing the EM-wave frequency, the light-controllable element and further to realize its expected
phase responses of the coding elements can be tuned freely. transmission performance, we use the CST Microwave Studio
However, most digital metasurfaces that have been dem- software package to simulate and optimize the element. In the
onstrated to date have been single-band ones of the reflective simulations, the “unit cell” boundary condition is used. We
select the dielectric material F4B with a dielectric constant of
a)
E-mail: wxjiang81@seu.edu.cn 2.65 and loss tangent of 0.001 as the substrate of the element,
b)
E-mail: tjcui@seu.edu.cn the thickness h of which is 2.0 mm. The sidelength a of the
metasurface comprises (i) a 15 15 array of digital elements diode)-based fluorescent tube is roughly 80 mW. With the light
and (ii) 70 photodiodes connected in series and located by source turned off, the light intensity is zero and the generated
the side of the metasurface, as shown in Fig. 3(a). The out- DC bias is zero. With the light source turned on, the illumina-
side copper layers of all the elements of the digital metasur- tion intensity is 6000 lx and the generated DC bias is 30 V.
face are connected together and then connected to the For light intensities EV ¼ 0 lx and 6000 lx, the measured
positive electrode of the photodiode array. The metasurface amplitudes of the transmission coefficient of the metasurface
is divided into 5 5 super unit cells (SUCs), each of which for y-polarized incident waves are shown in Fig. 3(d). With
comprises 3 3 elements. For each SUC, the feeding lines zero light intensity, there are two resonance frequencies of
are connected together, meaning that all elements in one 2.51 and 5.96 GHz; with a light intensity of 6000 lx, the two
SUC are controlled together. In the ideal case, each SUC is resonance frequencies are 3.28 and 6.71 GHz. The two work-
connected to one series of photodiodes and thus can be con- ing frequency bands shift slightly to higher frequencies and
trolled independently. Here, to simplify the fabrication, we change to the bands of 3.10–3.56 GHz and 5.84–6.24 GHz.
divide the metasurface into five columns of five SUCs each The measured results differ slightly from the simulated ones,
and then connect the ground lines of the columns together. and the reasons for this are analyzed in the supplementary
In the first experiment, the ground lines of all the columns material. Note that although there is a small difference
are connected to the negative electrode of the photodiode between the tested transmission performance and the simula-
array by a bias line. The fabricated sample covers a total tions, the measured dual resonance characteristics of the dig-
area of 300 280 mm2. ital metasurface agree very well with the simulation ones,
We use the free-space method to measure the transmission which validates the feasibility of light-controllable and
coefficients of the fabricated digital metasurface,52 and the frequency-dependent coding metasurfaces.
experimental environment is shown schematically in Fig. 3(b). Thus far, we have studied the tunability of the transmis-
In the experiment, large-area wave-absorbing materials are sion state of a tunable digital coding metasurface in the case
placed around the fabricated sample to avoid wave diffraction. of normal incidence. Next, to further verify the excellent tun-
The fabricated sample is placed on a supporting board, and the ing performance of the digital metasurface, we also investi-
distance from the sample to the transmitting antenna and that gate the case of EM-wave oblique incidence. The simulation
from the sample to the receiving antenna are both 1.5 m. We results are shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b) for incidence angles
first test the voltage generated by the 70 photodiodes when the of 30 and 60 , respectively. From the transmission curves,
illumination intensity (EV) changes; the measured results are the metasurface also works well with waves of larger incident
shown in Fig. 3(c). When the intensity of the light projected angle. The measured transmission curves agree very well
onto the photodiodes is zero and 6000 lx, the required voltages with the simulated ones, as shown in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d).
of zero and 30 V, respectively, are achieved. To provide light However, as the angle of oblique incidence increases, the
of the required intensity, we use a white-light fluorescent tube transmissivity at the resonance frequencies decreases, thereby
as the experimental light source and fix it above the photodiode narrowing the working bandwidth of the metasurface.
array, as shown in the inset of Fig. 3(b). In the measurements, To better understand the working mechanism of the digi-
the illumination beam power of the LED (light-emitting tal metasurface when controlling the transmission amplitude,
we plot the simulated surface-induced current distributions
for different coding patterns in Fig. 5. The whole metasurface
comprises 5 5 SUCs, each of which has the same coding
19 35
L. Huang, X. Chen, H. M€ uhlenbernd, H. Zhang, S. Chen, B. Bai, Q. Tan, K. Sarabandi and N. Behdad, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 55, 1239
G. Jin, K. W. Cheah, C. W. Qiu, J. Li, T. Zentgraf, and S. Zhang, Nat. (2007).
36
Commun. 4, 2808 (2013). C. Debus and P. H. Bolivar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 184102 (2007).
20 37
X. Ni, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, Nat. Commun. 4, 2807 (2013). M. N. Hussein, J. F. Zhou, Y. Huang, M. Kod, and A. P. Sohrab, IEEE
21
J. Lin, P. Genevent, M. A. Kats, N. Antoniou, and F. Capasso, Nano Lett. Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 65, 4851 (2017).
38
13, 4269 (2013). S. Ghosh and K. V. Srivastava, IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 60,
22
C. Huang, C. L. Zhang, J. N. Yang, B. Sun, B. Zhao, and X. G. Luo, Adv. 166 (2018).
39
Opt. Mater. 5, 1700485 (2017). N. I. Landy, S. Sajuyigbe, J. J. Mock, D. R. Smith, and W. J. Padilla, Phys.
23
L. Q. Cong, P. Pitchappa, Y. Wu, L. Ke, C. Lee, N. Singh, H. Yang, and Rev. Lett. 100, 207402 (2008).
40
R. Singh, Adv. Opt. Mater. 5, 1600716 (2017). A. B. Li, S. Kim, Y. Luo, Y. B. Li, J. Long, and D. F. Sievenpiper, IEEE
24
D. R. Smith, O. Yurduseven, L. P. Mancera, P. Bowen, and N. B. Kundtz, Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 65, 2810 (2017).
41
Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 054048 (2017). G. M. Akselrod, J. N. Huang, T. B. Hoang, P. T. Bowen, L. Su, D. R.
25
L. Q. Cong, P. Pitchappa, C. Lee, and R. Singh, Adv. Mater. 29, 1700733 Smith, and M. H. Mikkelsen, Adv. Mater. 27, 8028 (2015).
42
(2017). F. Costa and A. Monorchio, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 60, 2740 (2012).
26 43
Y. J. Zheng, X. Y. Cao, J. Gao, H. H. Yang, Y. L. Zhou, and T. Liu, Opt. P. Mei, X. Q. Lin, J. W. Yu, P. C. Zhang, and A. Boukarkar, IEEE Trans.
Express 25, 30001 (2017). Antennas Propag. 66, 409 (2018).
27 44
S. Liu, Q. Cheng, Q. Xu, T. Q. Wang, L. L. Du, K. Luan, Y. H. Xu, D. P. Kumar, A. Kedar, and A. K. Singh, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 63,
Bao, X. J. Fu, J. G. Han, W. L. Zhang, and T. J. Cui, Adv. Opt. Mater. 4, 4723 (2015).
45
384 (2016). W. P. M. N. Keizer, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 55, 715 (2007).
28 46
W. X. Jiang, C. Y. Luo, S. Ge, C. W. Qiu, and T. J. Cui, Adv. Mater. 27, See http://www.skyworksinc.com/uploads/documents/SMV1405_1430_
4628 (2015). Series_200068V.pdf for the data sheet of SMV1405 Plastic Packaged
29
T. J. Cui, M. Q. Qi, X. Wan, J. Zhao, and Q. Cheng, Light: Sci. Appl. 3, Abrupt Junction Tuning Varactor.
47
e218 (2014). B. A. Munk, Frequency Selective Surfaces: Theory and Design (Wiley,
30
S. Liu and T. J. Cui, Adv. Opt. Mater. 5, 1700624 (2017). New York, 2000).
31 48
L. L. Li, T. J. Cui, W. Li, S. Liu, J. Ding, X. Wan, Y. B. Li, M. H. Jiang, Z. Bai, Q. Zhang, Y. Ju, G. Tao, X. Jiang, N. Kang, C. Liu, and L. Zhang,
C. W. Qiu, and S. Zhang, Nat. Commun. 8, 197 (2017). J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49, 065002 (2016).
32 49
H. H. Yang, F. Yang, S. H. Xu, Y. L. Mao, M. K. Li, X. Y. Cao, and J. N. Xu, J. Gao, J. Zhao, and X. Feng, AIP Adv. 5, 077157 (2015).
50
Gao, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 64, 2246 (2016). C.-Y. Chen, S.-C. Wu, and T.-J. Yen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 034110 (2008).
33 51
P. Pitchappa, C. P. Ho, L. Q. Cong, R. Singh, N. Singh, and C. Lee, Adv. F. J. Rodrıguez-Fortu~no, R. Ortu~no, C. Garcıa-Meca, J. Martı, and A.
Opt. Mater. 4, 391 (2016). Martınez, J. Appl. Phys. 112, 103104 (2012).
34 52
H. T. Wu, S. Liu, X. Wan, L. Zhang, D. Wang, L. L. Li, and T. J. Cui, D. K. Ghodgaonkar, V. V. Varadan, and V. K. Varadan, IEEE Trans.
Adv. Sci. 4, 1700098 (2017). Instrum. Meas. 38, 789 (1989).