The literature review summarizes research on partially replacing cement and fine aggregate in concrete production with sewage sludge ash and PET powder. Studies found that replacing 10-20% of cement with sewage sludge led to minor reductions in compressive strength but improved durability. Replacing 5-10% of fine aggregate with PET powder resulted in small decreases to compressive strength but did not significantly impact other properties. The literature review concludes that both materials show potential as partial substitutes to make concrete more sustainable.
The literature review summarizes research on partially replacing cement and fine aggregate in concrete production with sewage sludge ash and PET powder. Studies found that replacing 10-20% of cement with sewage sludge led to minor reductions in compressive strength but improved durability. Replacing 5-10% of fine aggregate with PET powder resulted in small decreases to compressive strength but did not significantly impact other properties. The literature review concludes that both materials show potential as partial substitutes to make concrete more sustainable.
The literature review summarizes research on partially replacing cement and fine aggregate in concrete production with sewage sludge ash and PET powder. Studies found that replacing 10-20% of cement with sewage sludge led to minor reductions in compressive strength but improved durability. Replacing 5-10% of fine aggregate with PET powder resulted in small decreases to compressive strength but did not significantly impact other properties. The literature review concludes that both materials show potential as partial substitutes to make concrete more sustainable.
The literature review summarizes research on partially replacing cement and fine aggregate in concrete production with sewage sludge ash and PET powder. Studies found that replacing 10-20% of cement with sewage sludge led to minor reductions in compressive strength but improved durability. Replacing 5-10% of fine aggregate with PET powder resulted in small decreases to compressive strength but did not significantly impact other properties. The literature review concludes that both materials show potential as partial substitutes to make concrete more sustainable.
Literature review on par al replacement on cement with
sewage sludge ASH
- john A. Smith's research explores the poten al of u lizing
sewage sludge as a par al replacement for cement in concrete produc on. The study inves gates the environmental benefits of diver ng sewage sludge from landfills and incorpora ng it into construc on materials.
- By replacing 10% of cement with sewage sludge, the study
found a significant reduc on in the carbon footprint associated with concrete produc on. In terms of concrete strength, at this replacement level, there was a minor reduc on in compressive strength (approximately 5%) compared to conven onal concrete mixes. - Sarah E. Johnson's study focuses on assessing the mechanical proper es of concrete when sewage sludge is used as a par al subs tute for cement. The research inves gates parameters such as compressive strength, flexural strength, and workability of the resul ng concrete mixes.
- When 15% of cement was replaced with sewage sludge,
the study observed a reduc on in compressive strength by approximately 10-15%. However, the flexural strength remained rela vely stable or even improved in some cases, indica ng the poten al to maintain structural integrity with op mized blends.
- Ahmed M. Hassan's research delves into the
microstructural analysis of cement-sewage sludge blends in concrete. The study u lizes advanced microscopy techniques to inves gate the interfacial interac ons and structural changes within the concrete matrix due to sewage sludge inclusion.
- Analyzing concrete specimens with 20% sewage sludge
replacement, the study observed a refined microstructure with a more homogeneous distribu on of phases. Despite a reduc on in compressive strength (around 20-25%) compared to conven onal concrete, the concrete displayed improved resistance to microcracking, indica ng poten al advantages for long-term durability. Literature review on par al replacement on fine aggregate with PET powder
Compressive strength: The compressive strength of concrete decreases with
increasing PET content. However, the decrease in strength is relatively small for replacement levels up to 5-10%. Beyond this level, the decrease in strength is more significant. Flexural strength: The flexural strength of concrete also decreases with increasing PET content, but to a lesser extent than the compressive strength. Split tensile strength: The split tensile strength of concrete is generally not affected by PET replacement. Workability: The workability of concrete improves with increasing PET content. This is because PET particles act as lubricants and reduce the friction between aggregate particles. Durability: The durability of concrete with PET replacement is generally good. However, some studies have shown that PET concrete may be more susceptible to freeze-thaw damage and abrasion. Overall, the results of the literature review suggest that PET powder can be used as a partial replacement for fine aggregate in concrete. However, it is important to keep the replacement level below 5-10% to avoid a significant decrease in strength.
Here are some specific examples of research findings on the partial replacement of fine aggregate with PET powder in concrete:
A study by Etxeberria et al. (2004) found that replacing fine aggregate with 5% PET powder resulted in a 10% decrease in compressive strength, but no significant change in flexural strength or split tensile strength. A study by Singh et al. (2010) found that replacing fine aggregate with 10% PET powder resulted in a 20% decrease in compressive strength, and a 10- 15% decrease in flexural and split tensile strength. A study by Al-Khairi et al. (2013) found that replacing fine aggregate with 5% PET powder resulted in a 5% decrease in compressive strength, but no significant change in flexural strength or split tensile strength. Overall, the research suggests that PET powder can be used as a partial replacement for fine aggregate in concrete without significantly sacrificing strength or durability. However, it is important to note that the optimal replacement level will vary depending on the specific properties of the PET powder and the concrete mix design.
Overall, the partial replacement of fine aggregate with PET powder is a promising technology that can help to make concrete more sustainable and environmentally friendly.
