Report New
Report New
Submitted by:
SANARAHAMAT. A. KODAKERI (1RV15AS048)
Submitted to
R.V. College of Engineering
In partial fulfilment of the requirements
for the award of the degree of B.E
R.V.COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
(Autonomous Institution affiliated to Vishweshvarya Technical University)
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the entire work embodied in this dissertation has been
carried out by me and no part of it has been submitted for any degree or
diploma of any institution previously.
Place: Bangalore
Date: Name: Sanarahamat A Kodakeri
CONTENTS
1.1 Aim
1.2 Theory
1.4 Meshing
1.5 Solution
1.6 Results
1.7 Comparison
2.2 Results
3 WINDTUNNELS
4 REFERENCE
1. STUDY OF FLOW OVER CIRCULAR CYLINDER
1.1 Aim: To conduct a simulation of a circular cylinder using ansys fluent and compare the results
with experimental and theoretical results for same atmospheric conditions.
1.2 Theory: A circular cylinder is a wake body and hence there are turbulations in its wake
surface. The turbulence occurs in the form of vortex which propagates further and breaks. The
cylinder in a flow field has 2 stagnation points. The pressure distribution over the surface of cylinder
determines its lift and drag generating characteristics. Bernoulli’s principal is applied to compute
these aerodynamic characteristics with pressure difference.
Cp = (p - p∞)/ (½ρU∞2)
The above equation is the deduced form of the pressure equation of the cylinder to get the Coefficient
of pressure.
Separation
Turbulent wake
1.4 Meshing:
The mesh is generated by Blocking Method where the region of priority is made more uniform and
symmetric to get better results. As shown in the figure below, the domain is meshed with triangular
elements and the region of priority around the cylinder is then made quadrilateral such that the
distribution of nodes around the body is uniform.
1.5
0.5
0
0 100 200 300 400
-0.5
Supercritical Re
Cp -1 Theoretical results
Subcritical Re
-1.5
Simulated results
-2
-2.5
-3
-3.5
Theta
Fig.7.Experimental and theoretical results obtained by William J. Devenport et.al. compared with
simulated result in sub critical Re range.
2. METHOD OF CHARACTERISTICS FOR NOZZLE DESIGN
Y
C+
Characteristic line
Θ V
Streamline
μ
Characteristic line
C-
From the above equation, after algebraic and trigonometric manipulations we get
The above equations are the compatibility equations of the characteristics from the
given gas equation.
Expansion section
Θw max
M<1
Sonic line (generally curved)
Reflection
Fig.11. Schematic of supersonic nozzle design by the method of characteristics
The section right after the throat of the nozzle is called expansion section and the end point of this
section is denoted as ‘c’ called the inflection point. After this point the nozzle expansion stops and it
becomes parallel to the X axis of the nozzle. This allows the waves to get reflected such that they are
mirrored by the nozzle axis and hence only upper part of a nozzle can be considered. From these
reflected points, grids are generated by the method of characteristics in which the characteristic lines
help find the points adjacent to the initial points as shown in Fig.11
2.2 Results
This meshing results in the direct contour of the nozzle as shown in below Fig.12.
Nozzle contour with characteristic lines =10 Nozzle contour with characteristic lines =30
Height of nozzle
Nozzle contour with characteristic lines =100 Nozzle contour with characteristic lines =200
Length of Nozzle
Fig.12.nozzel contours with characteristics lines.
From this analysis it was also known that the nozzle height and length are highly unstable for low
quality mesh. As the number of characteristic lines was increased, the nozzle length increased
slightly. Hence a finer characteristic mesh is better suitable for a stable nozzle design.
= ........................................................................ (a)
From the left running characteristic line Ac
......................................................... (b)
At point A, from Prandtle Mayer theory,
...........................................................(c)
From equations (b) and (c)
............................................................... (d)
The above equation is applicable for all the rest of the characteristic lines running in the same
specified direction. Becomes the of exit Mach number.
For the right running characteristics C+, we can compute the location of the point with the help of
Deflection angle provided. Hence From compatibility equation 3a and 3b
C+ between Pt 1 and 2
;
C+ between Pt 2 and 3
;
Similarly we find the deflections of the rest of the points in the right running characteristic.
;
Considering point 7 to be in line with point A because it lies very close to point A, we get
θ7=θmax =9.105
This equipment helps us inverse the actual paradigm of aircraft flying in stationary air to stationary
aircraft in moving air. This conversion makes it easy for us to understand the effects of flow over the
aircraft in flight, generally a scaled down model of the actual aircraft is used in the tunnel testing
rather than the actual aircraft due to expenses and technical difficulties involved. Wind Tunnels are
classified based on their Velocity are of 4 types
1. Subsonic
2. Transonic
3. Supersonic
4. Hypersonic
However, other classifications include based on the design and test section etc.
PARTS
It Consists Of 5 Different Basic Parts
Intake
Nozzle
Test Section
Diffuser
Fan
COMPONENTS
The air is taken in from the inlet and is made laminar with the help of honey comb structures which
helps straighten the flow. This air is passed in the nozzle where it gets accelerated and attains a
uniform desired speed. This air is then passed in the test section where it flows over the model and
reverse paradigm of actual condition is obtained. This air is then passed through the diffuser to reduce
the kinetic energy of the flow and the air is exhausted through the exit. This whole cycle is driven by
a compressor fan which is set either in the inlet or the exit of the setup. The wind tunnels with fan
mounted on the inlet are called as push type and the ones with fan on exit are called pull type open
circuit wind tunnels.
Advantages
Disadvantages
1.Power requirement for a given speed is high
2.It is prone to foreign object damage
3.continuous air intake can cause dust particle to enter the tunnel and accumulate on the model
4.the model is prone to external humidity and dust or smoke environment
5.noise is comparatively high
6.requires large open space
Advantages
1. Power requirement for a particular speed is comparatively less.
2.Not prone to foreign object damage when cleaned properly
3.noise is significantly less
4.Air is free of dust and smoke from the outside environment
5.can be contained in the laboratory without damage to indoors
Disadvantages
Test Location/
Name regime Comments
section Size Organisation Use
L 46 ft x W
Full Scale: Automotive, Available and
14.7 ft x H
Oshawa, Motorsport, Cycling, accessible for all
ACE Climatic Wind 9.5 ft (L
Transonic Ontario, Skiing, Architectural, industries requiring
Tunnel 14.3 m x W
Canada Transit, Truck, Product wind tunnel services or
4.5 m x H
Development climatic services.
2.9 m)
8 ft × 6 ft
Glenn Transonic 8×6 Cleveland,
(2.4 m Transonic Research and other
foot Propulsion OH
× 1.8 m) aspects
Transonic
Langley Transonic 16 16 ft
Atmosphe Hampton, VA Research and other
Foot Atmospheric (4.9 m)
ric aspects
Test Location/
Name regime Comments
section Size Organisation Use
Free Piston Driven 300mm dia, Indian Institute Research and other
Hypersonic
Hypersonic shock length=2.5 of Science aspects
M=6-12
Tunnel HST3 m (IISc) India
Supersonic
38-ft long
(0-4M and
Glenn Propulsion and 24-ft Cleveland, Research and other
6M with
Simulation Lab Cell 4 wide in OH aspects
auxiliary
diameter
heater)
Hypersonic
Langley NASA/GASL (nominal
19ft long, Hampton, Research and other
HYPULSE Propulsion 6.5M, 5-10
7ft diameter VA aspects
Integration and 12-
25M!)
2. Numerical Solution For The Design Of Minimum Length Supersonic Nozzle, Md. Hasan Ali,
Mohammad Mashud, Abdullah Al Bari and Muhammad Misbah-Ul Islam, ARPN, p 605-612.
3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, text only site, Open Return Wind Tunnels
and their types.
6. The NASA Langley Scramjet Test Complex R. Wayne Guy, R. Clayton Rogers, *Richard L.
Puster, Kenneth E. Rock, and Glenn S. Diskin NASA Langley Research Center Hampton,
Virginia 23681-0001
7. KEEP TRISONIC WIND TUNNEL Apr 16,2007 A. Leroy Clarke| Aviation Week and Space
Technology
8. Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel. California's Historic Silicon Valley. National Park Services
Retrieved 2007-03-12
9. Space History : 1942 Wind Tunnel Test by NASA Archives | May 1,2012