Determining The Drag Force With CFD Method ANSYS Workbench 11.00
Determining The Drag Force With CFD Method ANSYS Workbench 11.00
Determining The Drag Force With CFD Method ANSYS Workbench 11.00
Ott Pabut
Tallinn
2010
Task 1
Determine analytically and with CFD method the moment which is generated on the
foundation of the water tower. The mass of the tower can be ignored.
D1
U
Data
b+D1/2 D1 = 15 m
D2 = 5 m
b = 20 m
U = 30 m/s
D2 b Csphere = 0,42
Ccylinder = 1,15
b/2 Ρair = 1,2401 kg/m3
M
Fig 1 – The water tower
2
Force applied to the water tower
In order to find the moment at the foundation the forces must be applied to their centers of
area:
15 20
· · 41,4 · 20 64,2 · 1780,5 kN · m
2 2 2 2
Answer: Foundation must resist bending moment M=1780,5 kN·m.
For a better solution the hydrodynamic similarity laws are used. This enables to conduct
experiments on smaller models but ensures that the results are transferable to reality.
As we are dealing with incompressible flow, Reynlods similarity criteria is used. Two systems
are similar, when their Reynolds numbers are equal.
, 2
From the equation 2 it can be seen that in order to reduce the dimensions of the system, speed
of the fluid U must be increased or kinematic viscosity μ must be decreased. In our task
dimensions must be reduced at least 10 times, which means that the speed of the flow would
go up to 300 m/s. This is unfavorable since it is close to the speed of sound 343 m/s. Systems
with sonic flows are not stable and our results might be inadequate. To solve the problem we
will change the viscosity by choosing a different fluid – water instead of air.
air water
density ρ 1,2041 kg/m3 998,19 kg/m3
dynamical viscosity μ 1,84·10-5 Pa/s 1,01·10-3 Pa/s
kinematical viscosity ν 1,53·10-5 m2/s 1,01·10-6 m2/s
3
Proportional coefficient:
1,53 · 10
15,15
1,01 · 10
D1 = 0,990 m
D2 = 0,330 m
b = 1,320 m
U = 30 m/s
Workbench offers possibilities for different flow analysis General, Turbomachinery, Quick
Setup, Library Template
4
It is assumed that the flow inside the computational domain is turbulent and isothermal.
These are the most similar conditions to those in the real environment. For these simulations
the Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model with automatic wall condition analysis is
used. This enables for very precise separation of flow particles when there are at least 10
mesh nods in the boundary layer. Currently the mesh is more robust to save calculation time.
1. From the upper taskbar click Create a Domain and name it Veetorn.
2. Apply the following settings
In order to get realistic results the boundary conditions must be similar to those in the reality.
For that reason atmospheric pressure and possible temperatures of the fluid are determined.
3. Click OK
5
1.2.4 Determining the boundary conditions
The imported mesh contains predefined 2D regions, which make it easier to apply boundary
conditions. For the simulation following conditions are needed: inlet, outlet and walls (no slip
and slip condition).
Inlet
Turbulence intensity is similar to the average wind tunnel where it is approximately 1-2 %.
4. Click OK
Outlet
Relative pressure defines the difference between the outlet and inlet pressure, currently the
same pressure applies for both and therefore the relative is 0 Pa.
3. Click OK
6
For sides and the upper plane of the rectangle slip wall condition is suitable. For those walls
the shear stress value is 0 and the flow of the fluid is not interrupted. If wind tunnel is used,
the dimensions of the rectangle should be equal to the tunnel. Computational domain for
atmospheric simulations must be big enough to ensure that streamlines exiting the area are
straight.
FreeWalls
3. Click Ok
7
Noslip wall
3. Click OK
Properties for the remaining 2D regions (in this case the lower XZ plane) are determined by
default. Currently the adiabatic no slip wall condition is suitable. Name of the default
conditions is Default Boundary. Even though Body and Default Boundary conditions are
identical, the Body condition was applied separately to allow easier post processing of the
results.
3. Click OK
8
As Workbench does not automatically calculate forces and moments, the parameters in
question must be set manually.
3. Click OK
To find the drag force on a surface, module Expressions must be used. It will apply CFX
expression language ((CEL) to find suitable parameters.
3. Vajuta OK
In normal condition the number of iterations must be at least 100, but in order to reduce the
calculation time it has been reduced.
9
Progress of the calculations can be observed form the Momentum and Mass charts. If the
results appear to go into the wrong direction, we can stop the calculations and enforce
necessary changes. On the right, info about the progress of the calculation and iterations
is displayed.
When the number of iterations has been reached or results have converged Workbench will
issue a message. To display and process results, question Post-process results now? must be
answered “Yes”. To study the simulation progress, the answer should be “No”. The results
can also be viewed by selecting CFX-Post form the lower taskbar.
10
To display results a base plane with sampling points must be created. This will determine the
starting points of the velocity vectors.
4. Click Apply
1. Double-click Baseplane
2. Apply following settings
3. Click Apply
Next the velocity vectors on the base plane are visualized. This helps to determine the
directions of flow particles and helps to display the recirculation zones.
11
4. Click Apply
4. Click Apply
Fig 4 – Streamlines
To find the drag force, click Quantitative on the Outline toolbar and then click Fflow
12
Drag force determined analytically was Fsum=105,6 kN and with CFD method Force @ Z =
211, 4 kN. Analytical and CFD results differ about 2 times. The reason for big difference can
be found in the size of the generated mesh and in the small number of iterations.
13