LISK/Rex Heuermann Application FINAL
LISK/Rex Heuermann Application FINAL
LISK/Rex Heuermann Application FINAL
C.P.L. §530.40
- against - BAIL APPLICATION
Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
On or about July 14, 2023, Defendant Rex A. Heuermann was charged by a Grand Jury with
the following six counts, which had been incorporated in Suffolk County Indictment # 71889-23:
• MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law Section
125.27(1)(a)(xi), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Melissa Barthelemy on or
• MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law Section
125.27(1)(a)(xi), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Megan Waterman on or about
June 6, 2010;
• MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law Section
125.27(1)(a)(xi), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Amber Costello on or about
September 2, 2010;
• MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law
Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Melissa Barthelemy on or
Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Megan Waterman on or
• MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law
Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Amber Costello on or about
September 2, 2010.
***
Today, Defendant Rex A. Heuermann stands before this Court charged by the Grand Jury in
a Superseding Indictment, which incorporates not only the above counts, but the additional charge of:
• MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law
Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Maureen Brainard-Barnes
***
The People filed a written bail application at Rex A. Heuermann’s initial arraignment, which
On July 14, 2023, the Hon. Richard Ambro ordered that Defendant Rex A. Heuermann be
remanded without bail. The matter was subsequently adjourned to August 1, 2023, before the Hon.
Timothy P. Mazzei. On August 1, 2023, and in the ensuing appearances that have followed, this
Set forth below is the People’s bail application in support of the Superseding Indictment,
which will expand on additional evidentiary developments in this investigation not included within
Exhibit A, further tying Defendant Heuermann to the murders of Melissa Barthelemy, Megan
2
Based on Defendant Heuermann’s indictment on an additional murder charge as it pertains to
now a fourth victim, the serious nature of these serial murders, the planning and forethought that went
into these crimes, the strength of the People’s case, the length of incarceration the Defendant faces
upon conviction, the extended period of time that this Defendant was able to avoid apprehension, and
the remaining facts set forth herein and contained within Exhibit A, the People remain steadfast that
the only means to ensure Defendant Rex A. Heuermann’s return to Court is to remand him without
bail.
Records Now Establish that Defendant Heuermann’s Wife Was Also Out of New York for
the Disappearance of Maureen Brainard-Barnes
As set forth in Exhibit A, travel and cellular telephone billing records had previously
established that Defendant Heuermann’s wife and children were out of the state during the
disappearances and murders of three of the four victims, specifically, Melissa Barthelemy, Megan
Heuermann’s arrest, law enforcement secured thousands of documents from storage units leased
by Defendant Heuermann. While the review of these records is ongoing, among these records is
an August 2007 Bank of America Credit Card statement (see embedded image on following
page), 1 which indicates a July 6, 2007 check-in to the Flagship Hotel, located in Atlantic City, as
well as transactions which are indicative of a stay in Atlantic City from July 6, 2007 through July
20, 2007.
1
The highlighted boxes have been added to the bank statement below for demonstration purposes
(red indicating a credit card charge for a stay at the Flagship Hotel beginning on July 6, 2007 and
blue indicating a credit card charge for a stay at the Club Wyndham Skyline Tower beginning on
July 13, 2007). When seized by law enforcement, the document below contained the handwriting
depicted in the bank statement below.
3
Based on post-arrest interviews with witnesses, including Defendant Heuermann’s wife,
Ms. Asa Ellerup, the Task Force was able to corroborate that Ms. Ellerup and her two children
stayed in Atlantic City, NJ, from on or about July 6, 2007 through on or about July 20, 2007. The
According to the investigation to date, Ms. Ellerup and her children checked in to the
Flagship Hotel on or about July 6, 2007. On or about July 13, 2007, Defendant Heuermann arrived
in Atlantic City. On that date, Defendant Heuermann and his family checked in to the Club
Wyndham Skyline Tower in Atlantic City, NJ (as seen above). Consequently, Defendant
4
Heuermann’s wife and children were indeed traveling out of state during the time of Maureen
Based on the foregoing, the murders of all four victims occurred at times when Defendant
Heuermann’s wife and children were traveling out of state, which allowed Defendant Heuermann
unfettered time to execute his plans for each victim without any fear that his family would uncover
Additional Burner Phones and Online Account Activity Linked to Defendant Heuermann
investigators located a number of online accounts and burner cellphones linked to Defendant
Heuermann, which were held by Defendant in fictitious names and used for illicit activities.
Two of those phones were recovered from Defendant Heuermann at the time of his arrest,
specifically, 347-885-1697, which was recovered from Defendant Heuermann’s office in Midtown
Manhattan, and 347-304-2671, which was recovered from Defendant Heuermann’s person. Both
phones have clear ties to Defendant Heuermann (as also set forth within Exhibit A), who utilized these
phones in furtherance of hundreds of contacts with sex-workers between 2020 and 2023.
For example, an extraction of 347-885-1697, which is an “Alcatel” flip phone recovered from
a. On or about March 1, 2020, starting at approximately 4:39 p.m., the following text
2
The District Attorney’s Office is aware of the full 10-digit phone number for SEX WORKER
PHONE # 1. The full number is redacted to maintain the privacy of the current possessor of said
phone.
5
b. At approximately 4:39 p.m., 347-885-1697 sent the following text message to SEX
text by stating, “I’M DON’T (sic) FOR THE DAY…DOES TOMORROW WORK?”;
ALL DAY. I WAS FREE TODAY MY WIFE IS OUT FOR THE DAY…WORKING
MONDAY”;
f. At approximately 5:19 p.m., 347-885-1697 sent the following text message to SEX
WORKER PHONE # 1, stating, “THANKS I WILL SEE WHICH DAY I CAN MAKE
WORK”;
6
g. On or about March 4, 2020, at approximately 7:49 p.m., 347-885-1697 sent the
Google records obtained via subpoena for the Sandbagger303@gmail.com (hereinafter the
“Sandbagger Email Account”) revealed that the account was created in 2017 and was subscribed in
the fictitious name of “Andrew Roberts,” a known alias utilized by Defendant Rex A. (“Andrew”)
Heuermann. A search warrant revealed that the Sandbagger Email Account was utilized as recently
as April 2021, to access and/or conduct searches related to pornography, rape, torture, and sex
workers several thousand times. Thereafter in April 2021, Defendant Heuermann is believed to
have transitioned such activity to the Thawk Email Account (described in further detail as set forth
in Exhibit A). For example, these newly discovered searches include, but are not limited to: 3
3
Unless otherwise notated, these searches are listed as they appeared in the Google records.
7
In addition, Defendant Heuermann used the Sandbagger Email Account, as recently as July
2021, to access and conduct dozens of searches into the Gilgo Beach Homicide
investigation. These searches or articles accessed include, but are not limited to: 4
Heuermann’s arrest, law enforcement seized hundreds of electronic devices from the Defendant’s
home and place of business. While the review of these records is ongoing, the data indicates that
Defendant Rex A. Heuermann utilized many of these electronic devices in a similar fashion, e.g.:
i. Google searches regarding the deceased victims and their family members;
iii. Google searches for software that would assist in wiping or erasing data from
iv. Purchase/use of Easy Hide IP, shredder.exe, and other digital masking/forensic
wiping tools;
4
Unless otherwise notated, these searches or article descriptions are listed as they appeared in
the Google records.
8
v. Google searches on serial killers and serial killer investigations;
Notably, an analysis of Defendant Heuermann’s laptop computer indicates the use of a file
shredding software on July 9, 2009, shortly before Defendant Heuermann was to meet Melissa
Barthelemy. Investigators believe this was an attempt to “shred” any digital evidence of the laptop
September 1, 2010, at approximately 9:03 p.m., Defendant Rex A. Heuermann accessed Amber
Costello’s Backpage ad, just hours before the “ruse” occurred as described within Exhibit A.
Approximately two hours later, at approximately 11:33 p.m. and 11:34 p.m., a burner phone linked
to Defendant Heuermann had communications with Amber Costello’s phone. During those
communications, the burner cellphone connected to cell site towers in West Amityville and
Massapequa Park. Thereafter, the burner cellphone indicates travel to West Babylon, in proximity
to the residence of Amber Costello, and again had contact with Ms. Costello’s phone at
approximately 12:05 a.m. on September 2, 2010, which is when witnesses describe an individual,
now known to be the Defendant Rex A. Heuermann, arriving at the Costello residence.
9
The Task Force’s discovery of a direct link between Rex A. Heuermann and Ms. Costello’s
Backpage ad, just hours before Defendant Heuermann met with Ms. Costello, further solidifies
that Defendant Heuermann was the “John” who was the subject of the ruse on September 2, 2010,
and therefore was the same “John” who returned later that day to pick-up Ms. Costello, prior to
her disappearance and murder. Despite Defendant Heuermann’s attempts to “wipe” or “scrub” his
laptop computer, he was unsuccessful in concealing his access to Ms. Costello’s Backpage ad.
Recent DNA Analysis of Hairs Recovered from the Examination of the Victims’ Bodies
As set forth in Exhibit A, the Suffolk County Crime Laboratory (hereinafter “SCCL”) and two
Laboratory # 2, conducted testing of hairs recovered on various victims,5 specifically comparing the
DNA profiles generated from these hairs recovered at the crime scenes to DNA profiles developed
On or about July 14, 2023, members of the Task Force met with Defendant Heuermann’s
wife, Asa Ellerup, as well as his daughter, Victoria Heuermann, and stepson, Christopher Sheridan
and obtained buccal swabs on consent from each of the three individuals. The Task Force
transported these swabs to the SCCL and requested that said items be tested against the DNA
profiles developed from eleven bottles, previously collected from garbage cans placed in in front
of Defendant Heuermann’s residence on July 21, 2022, 6 as well as a twelfth item, a “Monster Java”
5
Three of the four victims were restrained by burlap and tape (Melissa Barthelemy, Megan
Waterman, and Amber Costello), while the fourth victim (Maureen Brainard-Barnes) was
restrained by three belts. The pertinent hairs were recovered from the restraints of three of the four
victims, as set forth in Exhibit A.
6
The SCCL swabbed the “mouth” of said bottles and, of the eleven bottles collected outside the
Heuermann residence, the SCCL was able to develop three autosomal DNA profiles, ultimately
labeled “Unknown Individual A (a male later determined to be the step-son of Rex A.
10
a. “Monster Java” Can Recovered From Victoria Heuermann
On May 25, 2023, undercover agents of the Task Force conducted physical surveillance of
Victoria Heuermann, the then 26-year-old daughter of Defendant Heuermann. During said
surveillance, said agent(s) observed Victoria Heuermann board a Long Island Railroad train
(hereinafter “LIRR”) at Penn Station, which was headed eastbound towards Massapequa Park. The
undercover agent(s) then boarded the train and observed Victoria Heuermann drinking from a
gold-colored “Monster Java” can (see embedded and redacted image below).
Heuermann),” “Unknown Individual B (a female later determined to be Asa Ellerup, the wife of
Rex A. Heuermann),” and “Unknown Individual C (a male later determined to be Rex A.
Heuermann).”
11
Once the LIRR train arrived at the Massapequa Park station, undercover law enforcement
observed Victoria Heuermann exit the train, discard the can into a trash bin, and walk away from
the station. The undercover agent(s) of the Task Force then secured the gold-colored “Monster
Java” can from the trash receptacle (depicted below) and the can was then subsequently transported
Subsequent to Defendant Rex A. Heuermann’s arrest, the SCCL has been able to, inter
1. A female DNA profile was developed from the buccal swab of Victoria Heuermann,
which matched the DNA profile obtained from the “Monster Java” can;
2. A female DNA profile was developed from the buccal swab of Asa Ellerup, which
matched the DNA profiles obtained from two of the eleven bottle cans recovered from
12
in front of the Heuermann residence on July 21, 2022, which had previously been
DNA samples of the “Monster Java” can and the buccal swabs from Victoria Heuermann and
Asa Ellerup were sent to Forensic Laboratory # 1 and Forensic Laboratory # 2 for DNA profiling
and the identification of human remains. Forensic Laboratory # 1’s proprietary methods make it
possible to recover genetic profiles from rootless hair and other highly degraded samples that
otherwise fail traditional forensic DNA testing, including the aforementioned DNA analysis
Recently, Forensic Laboratory # 1 issued reports, which contain the following conclusions:
Ms. Brainard-Barnes had been left restrained by three leather belts, one of which was
utilized to tie Barnes’ feet/ankle/legs together. During the examination of the belts, the SCCL
recovered a human hair from the buckle of said belt (hereinafter “Female Hair on Barnes”). On or
about December 18, 2010, the SCCL was able to determine that it corresponded to a “Caucasian
head hair fragment.” Although this hair was found unsuitable for nuclear DNA profiling at that
time, it was subsequently sent to Forensic Laboratory # 1 for further DNA analysis prior to the
Recently, Forensic Laboratory # 1 was also able to generate DNA sequencing data for the
“Female Hair on Barnes.” Forensic Laboratory # 1 was then able to conduct a one-to-one
13
autosomal nuclear DNA comparison between said profile (developed from the Female Hair on
Barnes) to Asa Ellerup’s SNP Genotype File, which resulted in the following conclusion:
The DNA profile generated from the Female Hair on Barnes, which was recovered from a
belt buckle utilized to restrain Ms. Brainard-Barnes’ remains, is 7.9 trillion times more
likely to have come from a person genetically identical to Asa Ellerup’s SNP Genotype
File than from an unrelated individual (see embedded excerpt of report below):
Megan Waterman had been bound by duct tape. During the course of the examination of Ms.
Waterman’s body, two female human hairs were recovered, one “from outside the head area” and the
other from “the tape of the head area.” Both hairs were recovered in the vicinity of Ms. Waterman’s
head (hereinafter “Two Female Hairs on Waterman”). Examination by the SCCL indicated that the
Two Female Hairs on Waterman exhibited Caucasian/European characteristics, but were unsuitable
for further DNA testing at that time. The Two Female Hairs on Waterman were subsequently
14
submitted to Forensic Laboratory # 1, prior to the identification of Rex Heuermann as a suspect, for
Recently, Forensic Laboratory # 1 was able to generate DNA sequencing data for the Two
Female Hairs on Waterman and subsequently conducted a one-to-one autosomal nuclear DNA
comparison between said profiles (developed from the Two Female Hairs on Waterman) to Asa
First, with regards to the hair recovered “from outside the head area” of Ms. Waterman, the
DNA profile generated from said hair is 2.374 x 1048 more likely to have come from a person
genetically identical to Asa Ellerup’s SNP Genotype File than from an unrelated
individual. 7
7
The 2.374 x 1048 statistic, and the following statistical probabilities, are provided in scientific
notation. For illustration purposes, the standard notation for 2.374 x 1048 is 2.374 with 48 zeros
thereafter, i.e., 2,374,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. So, in
other words, with regards to the hair recovered “from outside the head area” of Ms. Waterman, the
DNA profile generated from said hair is 2,374,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000 more likely to have come from a person genetically identical to Asa Ellerup’s
SNP Genotype File than from an unrelated individual.
15
Second, with regards to the hair recovered from “the tape of the head area” of Ms. Waterman,
the DNA profile generated from said hair is 2.778 x 10480 more likely to have come from a
person genetically identical to Asa Ellerup’s SNP Genotype File than from an unrelated
individual.
An examination of the body of Amber Costello revealed that she appeared to have been bound
by burlap, as well as numerous pieces of duct tape. During the course of the examination of Ms.
Costello’s body, a female human hair was recovered, specifically on a piece of tape from the burlap
wrapping, in the vicinity of Ms. Costello’s head (hereinafter “Female Hair on Costello”). A
subsequent examination of the Female Hair on Costello led to the determination that it had
Caucasian/European characteristics, however, it was unsuitable for further DNA testing at that time
by the SCCL. Prior to the identification of Rex Heuermann as a suspect, the Female Hair on
16
Costello was subsequently submitted to Forensic Laboratory # 1 for further DNA analysis.
Recently, Forensic Laboratory # 1 was able to generate DNA sequencing data for the
Female Hair on Costello and subsequently conducted a one-to-one autosomal nuclear DNA
comparison between said profile (developed from the Female Hair on Costello) to Victoria
Heuermann’s SNP Genotype File (developed from the “Monster Java” can which had been
discarded by Victoria Heuermann on May 25, 2023), which resulted in the following conclusion:
The DNA profile generated from the Female Hair on Costello is 4.654 x 1063 more likely
to have come from a person genetically identical to Victoria Heuermann’s SNP Genotype
File than from an unrelated individual (see embedded excerpt of report below). 8
8
Notably, at the time of Ms. Amber Costello’s disappearance and murder, Victoria Heuermann
would have been almost one-month shy of her 14th birthday.
17
Based on the foregoing, it is significant that two forensic laboratories, Forensic Laboratory
# 1 and Forensic Laboratory # 2, 9 have now independently determined that the female hairs
recovered on the remains of Ms. Waterman and Ms. Costello, are substantially more likely to have
derived from a person genetically identical to the SNP Genotype Files of members of Defendant
Heuermann’s family, specifically his wife, Asa Ellerup and his daughter, Victoria Heuermann,
than from an unrelated individual. Moreover, as set forth herein and in Exhibit A, Ms. Ellerup and
Victoria Heuermann were out of the state at the time of these murders, which provides further
support that Rex A. Heuermann murdered, restrained, and transported the remains of the victims
Finally, during the initial examination of Ms. Waterman’s skeletal remains and the burlap
materials, the SCCL was also able to recover a male hair from the “bottom of the burlap” used to
wrap Ms. Waterman by her killer (hereinafter “Male Hair on Waterman”). An initial examination
9
In addition to Forensic Laboratory # 1 conducting nuclear DNA testing of the pseudo-
exemplars and buccal swab samples from Victoria Heuermann and Asa Ellerup, Forensic
Laboratory # 2 conducted mitochondrial DNA testing and was able to generate a full mitochondrial
DNA profile from the aforementioned Gatorade bottle, which, as set forth herein, is directly
attributable to Asa Ellerup.
Since humans inherit their mitochondrial DNA solely from their mothers, a mother and her
children, e.g., Asa Ellerup and Victoria Heuermann, respectively, would share the same
mitochondrial DNA profile. Here, Forensic Laboratory # 1’s nuclear DNA comparison provides
clarity as to who within Asa Ellerup and Victoria Heuermann’s mitochondrial profile is the
contributor of the Female Hair on Costello.
18
of said hair revealed Caucasian/European characteristics. However, the hair was unsuitable for
further DNA analysis at that time by the SCCL. The Male Hair on Waterman was subsequently
submitted to Forensic Laboratory # 1 prior to the identification of Rex Heuermann as a suspect and
Recently, Forensic Laboratory # 1 was able to generate DNA sequencing data for the Male
Hair on Waterman and subsequently conducted a one-to-one autosomal nuclear DNA comparison
between said profiles (developed from the Male Hair on Waterman) to Rex Heuermann’s SNP
Genotype File (developed from an extract of the napkin contained within the pizza box depicted
below and described in further detail in Exhibit A), which resulted in the following conclusion:
19
The DNA profile generated from the Male Hair on Waterman is 1.408 x 10169 more likely
to have come from a person genetically identical to Rex Heuermann’s SNP Genotype File
Subsequent analysis by Forensic Laboratory # 2 has also forensically tied Defendant Rex
A. Heuermann to the contents of the aforementioned pizza box. Specifically, on August 1, 2023,
the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office (hereinafter “SCDAO”) filed an Order to Show
Cause, pursuant to CPL 245.40(1)(e), which required Defendant Heuermann to submit to the
taking of an oral buccal swab. On August 9, 2023, the Hon. Timothy P. Mazzei granted the
SCDAO’s motion. On or about August 16, 2023, SCDAO Detective Investigators secured a buccal
The SCCL analyzed and subsequently generated a nuclear DNA profile from Defendant
Rex A. Heuermann’s buccal swab and sent extracts of said swab to Forensic Laboratory # 2 for
20
mitochondrial DNA profiling and further comparison.
3402K4;
iv. Forensic Laboratory # 2 was able to conclude “[t]he mitochondrial DNA profile
of 3402K2 (from the pizza crust) and 3402K4 (Rex Heuermann buccal swab)
Recently, the SCCL also issued a report containing the following conclusions:
i. A male nuclear DNA profile was developed from the buccal swab of Rex A.
from not only the contents of the pizza box described supra, to wit, the pizza
crusts and napkin, but also the bottles left out for collection on July 21, 2022
Laboratory # 2 have been able to determine that the Male Hair on Waterman, namely the male hair
recovered near the “bottom of the burlap” utilized to restrain and transport Megan Waterman’s
naked and deceased body, is substantially more likely to have derived from a person genetically
identical to Rex A. Heuermann’s SNP Genotype File than from an unrelated individual.
21
***
The chart below summarizes the aforementioned results from Forensic Laboratory # 1 and
Forensic Laboratory # 2, which have been independently able to determine that hairs recovered on
three of the four victims are forensically tied to Defendant Heuermann and to members of his
immediate family while that family was out-of-state, lending further support to the conclusion that
Defendant Heuermann is the individual who murdered, stripped, restrained, and transported the
remains of each of the aforementioned victims to Gilgo Beach until the victims were ultimately
22
Penalties
If convicted on the current charges, Defendant Rex A. Heuermann faces multiple sentences
Based on the serious, heinous nature of these serial murders, the strength of the People’s case,
the life incarceration the defendant faces upon conviction, the extreme measures this defendant took
to attempt to avoid apprehension for over a decade, Defendant’s use of fictitious names, email and
indictment on yet another murder charge as it pertains to now a fourth victim, the People remain
steadfast that the only means to ensure the Defendant’s return to court is to remand the Defendant
without bail.
RAYMOND A. TIERNEY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY
________________________________
By: Andrew Lee
Assistant District Attorney
23
EXHIBIT A
COUNTY COURT OF SUFFOLK COUNTY
STATE OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
C.P.L. §530.40
- against - BAIL APPLICATION
Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Defendant Rex A. Heuermann stands before this court charged by the Grand Jury with:
MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law Section
125.27(1)(a)(xi), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Melissa Barthelemy on or
MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law Section
125.27(1)(a)(xi), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Megan Waterman on or about
June 6, 2010;
MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law Section
125.27(1)(a)(xi), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Amber Costello on or about
September 2, 2010;
MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law
Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Melissa Barthelemy on or
MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of New York State Penal Law
Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Megan Waterman on or
Section 125.25(1), a class A-I violent felony for the death of Amber Costello on or about
September 2, 2010.
As described below, based on the serious, heinous nature of these serial murders, the planning
and forethought that went into these crimes, the strength of the People’s case, the length of
incarceration the defendant faces upon conviction, the extended period of time that this Defendant
was able to avoid apprehension, his recent searches for sadistic materials, child pornography, images
of the victims and their relatives, counter-surveillance conducted online as to the criminal
investigation, his use of fictitious names, burner email and cellphone accounts, and his access to and
history of possessing firearms, the only means to ensure Defendant Rex A. Heuermann’s return to
On December 11, 2010, Police Officer John Malia was conducting a training exercise with
his K9 partner, Blue, along Ocean Parkway in Gilgo Beach, Suffolk County, New York. During
the course of the training exercise, Blue located a set of human remains. The remains were later
identified to be those of Melissa Barthelemy. Two days later, on December 13, 2010, the SCPD
continued to search in proximity to where the remains of Melissa Barthelemy were recovered. On
that date, members of the SCPD found three additional sets of human remains within one-quarter
mile of the first discovery (see image below). These three additional sets of remains were
2
identified as those of Maureen Brainard-Barnes,1 Megan Waterman, and Amber Costello. The
The investigations into these deaths were linked as, in addition to other factors, the victims
each appeared to have been placed in close proximity to one another, 22 to 33 feet from the edge
of the parkway, all were petite females approximately 22 to 27 years old, believed to be working
as sex workers, all had missing clothing and personal possessions, all had been killed by homicide,
all had contact shortly before their disappearances with a person using a “burner” cellphone (i.e.,
cellphones without an associated verified identity), and the cellphones of two of the four victims,
1
Although the defendant is not yet charged with any crimes as to the disappearance and
murder of Ms. Brainard-Barnes, as set forth below, Defendant Rex A. Heuermann is the prime
suspect in her death and the investigation, which is continuing and is expected to be resolved soon.
Moreover, there is substantial evidence of Defendant Heuermann’s involvement in the
disappearance and death of Ms. Brainard-Barnes, which evidence closely fits the modus operandi
of the Defendant in relation to the deaths of the other three women and which supports the current
charges. As such, this bail application contains descriptions of that evidence which demonstrates
the strength of the People’s case as currently charged.
3
Brainard-Barnes and Barthelemy, were used by the killer after their deaths. In addition, each of
the four victims were found similarly positioned, bound in a similar fashion by either belts or tape,
Recent Investigation
In January 2022, the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office assigned an experienced
team of investigators, analysts, and prosecutors to work jointly with law enforcement partners from
the Suffolk County Police Department, New York State Police, Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office
and Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”). A comprehensive review of every item of evidence
and information in this investigation was undertaken by the team. On March 14, 2022,
approximately two months into the renewed joint investigation, this comprehensive review led to
the discovery of a first-generation Chevrolet Avalanche that was registered to Defendant Rex A.
Heuermann at the time of these murders. As described below, this was significant, because a
consisted of over 300 subpoenas, search warrants and other legal processes to obtain evidence. As
discussed more fully below, among the items uncovered were cellphone billing records for
Defendant Heuermann corresponding to cell site locations for 1) the burner cellphones used to
arrange meetings with three of the four victims, 2) the taunting calls made to a relative of Ms.
Barthelemy, 3) a call made by a detective to Ms. Barthelemy’s cellphone while looking into her
disappearance and 4) calls checking voicemail on Ms. Brainard-Barnes’ cellphone after her
disappearance. In addition, Heuermann lived in Massapequa Park where the victims were believed
to have disappeared from, and he worked in Midtown Manhattan, in the vicinity where the taunting
4
calls were made to the sister of Ms. Barthelemy. As set forth more fully below, Defendant Rex A.
Heuermann is believed to be the person who used the burner cellphones to communicate with each
of the four victims prior to their disappearance and who used Ms. Brainard-Barnes’ cellphone and
Ms. Barthelemy’s cellphone after their deaths. Both Defendant Heuermann and these burner
cellphones had significant connections to both Midtown Manhattan and Massapequa Park, New
York.
Maureen Brainard-Barnes was last seen on July 9, 2007, in New York City. At that time,
she was believed to be working as a sex worker. On July 6, 2007, Ms. Brainard-Barnes’ cellphone
was contacted by a burner cellphone. Between July 6, 2007 and July 9, 2007, there were sixteen
interactions between this burner phone and Brainard-Barnes’ cellphone. On July 9, 2007, the last
cell site location for the Brainard-Barnes cellphone was at approximately 11:56 p.m. in Midtown
Manhattan near the 59th Street Bridge. Thereafter, the Brainard-Barnes cellphone had no further
activity until July 12, 2007. On July 12, 2007, three days after her disappearance, two outbound
calls were made from Brainard-Barnes cellphone, checking her voicemail from a cell site location
Melissa Barthelemy was last seen on July 10, 2009, in New York City. At that time, she
was believed to be working as a sex worker. On July 3, 2009, Ms. Barthelemy was contacted by
a burner cellphone. Thereafter, the Barthelemy Cellphone was contacted by this burner cellphone
on July 6, July 9, and July 10, 2009, which was the last day she was seen alive. On July 10, 2009,
cell site records indicate the burner cellphone traveled from Massapequa Park to Midtown
Manhattan. Later that evening, the Barthelemy Cellphone traveled from Midtown Manhattan to
5
Massapequa with the last cell site location being in Massapequa on July 11, 2009, at approximately
1:43 a.m. On July 11, 2009, Ms. Barthelemy’s cellphone was used to make an outbound call
checking her voicemail from a cell site location in Freeport. On July 11 and July 12, 2009, the
Barthelemy Phone made two more outbound calls checking her voicemail from cell site locations
in Babylon. On July 17, July 23, August 5, August 19, and August 26, 2009, the Barthelemy
Phone made taunting phone calls to Ms. Barthelemy’s family members, some of which resulted in
a conversation between the caller, who was a male, and a relative of Melissa Barthelemy, in which
the male caller admitted killing and sexually assaulting Ms. Barthelemy. As described below, the
cell site locations of the Barthelemy Phone during these taunting calls were all in Midtown
Manhattan.
Megan Waterman was last seen alive at the Holiday Inn in Hauppauge, New York, on June
6, 2010, at approximately 1:30 a.m. At that time, she was believed to be working as a sex
worker. On June 5, 2010, Ms. Waterman’s cellphone was contacted by another burner cellphone,
which had just been activated that day. Thereafter, the Waterman Phone communicated with this
burner cellphone on June 6, 2010, at approximately 1:31 a.m., which is around the time Megan
Waterman was captured on video surveillance exiting the Holiday Inn in Hauppauge for the last
time. Following that communication, the burner cellphone had no further phone
activity. However, cell site records show that the Waterman Phone traveled to Massapequa Park
with the last cell site location being in Massapequa Park at approximately 3:11 a.m. in the vicinity
6
The Disappearance and Murder of Amber Costello
Amber Costello was last seen alive on September 2, 2010, leaving her residence at 1112
America Avenue in West Babylon during the late evening hours. At that time, she was believed
to be working as a sex worker. On September 1, 2010, the day prior to the disappearance of Amber
Costello, Ms. Costello’s cellphone was contacted by a burner cellphone. On September 1, 2010,
this burner cellphone had communications with the Costello Phone at approximately 11:33 p.m.
and 11:34 p.m. During those communications, the burner cellphone connected to cell site towers
in West Amityville and Massapequa Park. Thereafter, the burner cellphone traveled to West
Babylon, in proximity to the residence of Amber Costello, and had contact with the Costello Phone
According to witnesses, around the time of these communications between the burner
cellphone and the Costello Phone on September 1-2, 2010, a prostitution client showed up at Ms.
Costello’s residence located in West Babylon, New York. After the client entered the home, a
ruse was executed on the client whereby a person pretended to be the outraged boyfriend of Amber
Costello and the client left from the residence, while Amber Costello retained the money the client
had brought to pay for her services. Based upon interviews, that client was described as a large,
white male, approximately 6’4’ to 6’6” in height, in his mid-forties, with “dark bushy hair,” and
“big oval style 1970’s type eyeglasses.”2 A witness described him to police as appearing like an
driveway of the residence. According to the witness, following the ruse, this client said he was
“just her friend,” “tell her I’ll give her a call,” and walked out the front door. Thereafter, at
2
This mirrors the physical attributes of Defendant Rex A. Heuermann who is a large,
white male, approximately 6’4” in height, in excess of 240 pounds in weight, with dark bushy
hair, who wears large eyeglasses and who was 46 years old when Amber Costello went missing.
7
approximately 1:18 a.m., on September 2, after the ruse had been perpetrated, the burner cellphone
sent a text message to the Costello Phone, which stated, “That was not nice so do i [sic] credit for
next time.” Phone records show that the burner phone was located in Massapequa Park, within
According to a witness, later the next day on September 2, 2010, Ms. Costello was again
contacted by the same client that was in the house the night before with the Avalanche. Further,
“Amber told us that he wanted to see her again, but he didn’t want to come back to the house
Thereafter on September 2, 2010, at approximately 9:32 p.m., the same burner cellphone
from the previous evening again communicated with the Costello Phone. During this
communication, the burner cellphone used a cell site location in Midtown Manhattan. Following
this communication and based upon the cell site records, the burner cellphone traveled to
Massapequa Park and had contacts with the Costello Phone at approximately 10:39 p.m. and 11:05
p.m. Cell site records for the burner phone indicate that at approximately 11:17 p.m., the phone
traveled to West Babylon in proximity to the residence of Amber Costello. Subsequently, Amber
Costello left her own cellphone behind, walked out the front door of the residence, and was seen
alive for the last time. Shortly after Ms. Costello left the house, a witness observed a dark-colored
truck pass the house, specifically coming from the direction Amber had walked towards.
Records Establish that Defendant Heuermann’s Wife Was Out of New York for the
Disappearances of Barthelemy, Waterman and Costello
Significantly, travel records show that on July 8, 2009, Defendant Heuermann’s wife
departed the United States for Iceland. On August 18, 2009, Defendant Heuermann’s wife
returned to the United States. Consequently, Defendant Heuermann’s wife was out of the country
8
Based upon cellular telephone billing records, on June 4, 2010, the cellular telephone
subscribed to by Defendant Heuermann’s wife traveled from New York to Maryland. On June 8,
2010, the cellular telephone subscribed to by Defendant Heuermann’s wife returned to New York
from Maryland. Consequently, based upon cellular telephone records, the cellular telephone
subscribed to by Defendant Heuermann’s wife was out of New York State during the time of
Based upon cellular telephone billing records, on August 28, 2010, the cellular telephone
subscribed to by Defendant Heuermann’s wife traveled from New York to New Jersey. On
September 5, 2010, the cellular telephone subscribed to by his wife returned to New York from
New Jersey. Consequently, the cellular telephone subscribed to by Defendant Heuermann’s wife
was out of New York State during the time of Amber Costello’s disappearance.3
During the times of the disappearances and murders of the victims, Defendant Heuermann
owned an architectural business located in Midtown Manhattan and this business was the named
subscriber of Heuermann’s cellphone, which was active during the times of the victims’
disappearances and subscribed to Heuermann’s home address in Massapequa Park. Although cell
site records from that time period no longer existed, investigators obtained cellular billing records
which showed general location information for Heuermann’s cellphone. A review of these records,
as well as Heuermann’s American Express records, showed numerous instances where Heuermann
was located in the same general locations as the burner cellphones used to contact victims Barthelemy,
3
Neither cellular telephone billing records, nor travel/financial records, could be obtained
for Defendant Heuermann’s wife for 2007, as such records were no longer available due to
retention policies. Therefore, it is undetermined at this time Defendant Heuermann’s wife was
traveling out-of-state during the time of Maureen Brainard-Barnes’ disappearance and murder.
9
Waterman, and Costello,4 as well as the use of Brainard-Barnes and Barthelemy’s cellphones when
they were used to check voicemail and make taunting phone calls after the women disappeared.
Significantly, investigators could find no instance where Heuermann was in a separate location from
For example, on July 10, 2009, the last day Melissa Barthelemy was seen alive, both the
burner phone and Defendant Heuermann’s phone were in the area of Massapequa and traveled
together toward New York City. Thereafter, both Ms. Barthelemy’s phone and Heuermann’s phone
On July 14, 2009, at approximately 7:15 p.m., cell site records indicate the burner phone used
to contact Ms. Barthelemy prior to her disappearance had activity in Manhattan. On this same date,
between approximately 6:58 p.m. and 7:22 p.m., billing records from Heuermann’s cellphone also
Following Ms. Barthelemy’s disappearance, on July 17, 2009, at approximately 12:40 p.m., a
male caller used the Barthelemy Phone to contact Ms. Barthelemy’s family. The Barthelemy Phone
was located in New York City at this time, specifically attached to a cellular tower located at 4 Penn
Plaza, which is approximately 2,372 feet or .45 miles from Heuermann’s then-office space, which
4
Unfortunately, cell site records for the burner cellphone used to contact Ms. Brainard-
Barnes were not obtained at the time of her disappearance and no longer exist.
10
at the time was located at 19 West 36th Street, New York, NY (see illustration below). On this same
date, at approximately 1:45 pm., billing records from Heuermann’s phone also show a call location
11
On July 22, 2009, at 6:51 p.m., cell site records indicate the burner cellphone had activity
in New York City, specifically attached to a cellular tower located at 19 West 34th Street, which is
approximately 872 feet or .16 miles from Defendant Heuermann’s then-office space, which at the
time was located at 19 West 36th Street, New York, NY (see illustration below). On this same date,
at approximately 5:12 p.m., billing records from Heuermann’s cellphone listed a call located in
12
On July 23, 2009, at approximately 1:39 p.m., cell site records indicate that the burner
cellphone had activity in New York City, specifically attached to a cellular tower located at 19
West 34th Street, which is approximately 872 feet or .16 miles from Heuermann’s then-office space
(see illustration below). On that same date, at approximately 12:48 p.m., billing records from
On July 23, 2009, at approximately 6:42 p.m., a male caller used the Barthelemy Phone to
contact her family. The Barthelemy Phone was located in New York City at this time, specifically
attached to a cellular tower located at 275 West 39th Street, which is approximately 872 feet or .16
miles from Heuermann’s then-office space. On July 23, 2009, between approximately 8:29 p.m.
and 9:30 p.m., the burner cellphone had activity in New York City. Later on this same date, at
approximately 11:05 p.m., billing records from Heuermann’s cellphone listed a call located in
Jamaica, Queens.
13
On August 5, 2009, between approximately 6:50 p.m. and 7:11 p.m., a male caller used the
Barthelemy Phone to contact Ms. Barthelemy’s family. During said time period, the Barthelemy
Phone utilized the following cellular phone towers in New York City, which are 2230 to 3280 feet
from Heuermann’s then office-space (see illustration below). On this same date, during a similar
timeframe, between approximately 6:46 p.m. and 7:05 p.m., Heuermann’s cellphone listed billing
On August 10, 2009, based upon subpoenaed travel documents, Heuermann departed for
Iceland and all phone activity for the Barthelemy Phone stopped. On August 18, 2009, Heuermann
returned from Iceland and phone activity for the Barthelemy Phone resumed the next day.
14
On August 19, 2009, at approximately 7:23 p.m., a male caller used the Barthelemy Phone
to contact Ms. Barthelemy’s family. Cell site records indicate that the Barthelemy Phone was
located in New York City at this time, specifically attached to a cellular tower located at 249 West
36th Street, which is approximately 2,831 feet or .53 miles from Heuermann’s then-office space
(see illustration below). On this same date, before and after the call to Barthelemy’s family, at
approximately 7:16 p.m. and 7:28 p.m., billing records from Heuermann’s cellphone list calls
15
On August 26, 2009, between approximately 11:29 a.m. and 11:34 a.m., a male caller used
the Barthelemy Phone to contact Ms. Barthelemy’s family. According to cell site records, the
Barthelemy Phone was located in New York City at this time, specifically attached to the cellular
tower located at 4 Penn Plaza, which is approximately 2,230 feet or .42 miles from Heuermann’s
then-office space (see illustration below). On this same date, at approximately 11:38 a.m., billing
records for Heuermann’s cellphone list a call location in New York City.
16
Additional Burner Phones and Online Account Activity Linked to Defendant Heuerman
Heuermann, investigators located a number of online accounts and burner cellphones linked to
Defendant Heuermann, but which were held by him in fictitious names and used for illicit activities.
American Express records obtained via subpoena revealed recurring “Google Pay” payments
made by Defendant Heuermann to “Tinder,” an online dating and geosocial networking application
Records were then obtained from Tinder, which revealed that the Tinder Profile was set up in
the name “Andy” (Heuermann’s middle name is Andrew), with links to a burner cellphone 347-885-
1697, subscribed in the fictitious name of “Andrew Roberts,” using an email account,
on January 15, 2011, in the fictitious name “John Springfield” with an Astoria, Queens, New York
zip code, using another burner cellphone, 347-304-2671, which records show has no named
subscriber.
Records obtained from Verizon showed that Defendant Heuermann’s cellphone was used
on December 11, 2022, for a period of over three hours to access the fictitious Springfieldman9
AOL Account. Similarly, records obtained from T-Mobile show that burner cellphone 347-304-
2671 was used on multiple dates including November 8, 2022, to access this account.
A review of call records for these two additional burner cellphones revealed that both
cellphones were used extensively between 2021 and 2023 for prostitution-related contacts (either
with sex workers or massage parlors). In addition, cell site warrants for these burner cellphones
revealed that just like the burner cellphones Defendant Heuermann used to contact the victims
prior to their disappearances, these additional burner cellphones had frequent cell site activity in
17
Midtown Manhattan and Massapequa Park. Specifically, the records revealed that both these
burner cellphones consistently had activity on the cellular towers that provided coverage to
Defendant Heuermann’s residence in Massapequa Park and his business in New York City.
Legal process served on Google seeking records or accounts associated with the device
identifiers of these additional burner cellphones revealed a connection to yet another “burner” or
“junk” email account, namely thawk080672@gmail.com (hereinafter the “Thawk Email Account”).
Google records further indicated that the Thawk Email Account was subscribed in the fictitious name
“Thomas Hawk.” A search warrant revealed that the Thawk Email Account, associated with burner
cellphone 347-304-2671, was used to conduct thousands of searches related to sex workers, sadistic,
18
27. Old Janitors gangbang little school girl
28. Crying girl painful anal
29. School girl
30. Crying teen porn
The Thawk Email Account was also used to conduct in excess of two-hundred (200)
searches, between March 2022 and June 2023, related to active and known serial killers, the
Waterman, and Amber Costello, and the investigation into their murders. These searches or
1. “why could law enforcement not trace the calls made by the long island
serial killer”
2. “why hasn’t the long island serial killer been caught”
3. “Long Island killer”
4. “Long Island Serial Killer Phone Call”
5. “Long Island Serial Killer update”
6. “Long Island Serial Killer Update 2022”
7. “FBI active serial killers”
8. “Serial Killers by State 2023”
9. “Map of all known serial killers”
10. “unsolved serial killer cases”
11. “America’s 5 most notorious old cases”
12. “11 Currently Active Serial Killers”
13. “8 Terrifying Active Serial Killers (We Can’t Find)”
14. “John Bitroff”
15. “Megan Waterman”
16. “Melissa Barthelemy”
17. “Maureen Brainard-Barnes”
18. “[Redacted – name of relative of Melissa] Barthelemy”
19. “[Redacted – name of relative of Megan] Waterman”
20. “Cops launch Gilgo Beach Homicide Investigation Task Force”
21. “Mapping the Long Island Murder Victims”
22. “Inside the Long Island Serial Killer and Gilgo Beach”
23. “The Gilgo Beach Killer | Criminal Minds”
24. “In Long Island serial killer investigation, new phone technology may be
key to break in case”
19
The Thawk Email Account was also used to search for a number of podcasts and/or
Significantly, Defendant Heuermann also searched for and viewed articles concerning the
20
A search warrant conducted on the fictitious Springfieldman9 AOL Account further
revealed “selfie” photographs that appeared to have been taken by Defendant Rex Heuermann of
himself (see below) and sent to other persons to solicit and arrange for sexual activity, further
linking Heuermann to the fictitious email account and the burner cellphone, 347-304-2671, used
21
Defendant Rex A. Heuermann was further linked to the burner cellphone 347-304-2671,
because on May 19, 2023, Defendant Heuermann was observed by law enforcement via video and
field surveillance, at a cellphone store in Midtown Manhattan, and purchased additional minutes
22
23
Analysis of the Springfieldman9 AOL Account also led to the discovery of another email
February 14, 2021, to send an image of a prostitute from upstate New York between two of
Heuermann’s secret email accounts. Further investigation revealed that the Hunter1903a3 Google
Account was created on February 14, 2021, using burner cellphone 347-885-1697 as the user’s
phone number and SMS recovery number, and subscribed in the fictitious name “Andy Roberts”
(the same fake name linked to the Target Tinder Profile and burner cellphone 347-885-1697, as
well as the same alias utilized by Defendant Heuermann in communications with numerous
potential sex partners responding to his advertisements for sex) and the fictitious birthday of August
6, 1972 (which corresponds to the digital ending of the burner account Thawk080672@gmail.com).
In addition, Google provided IP Address information for the user’s acceptance of the Terms of
Service, which revealed that the Terms of Service were accepted on February 14, 2021, from IP
address, 24.184.75.31. Significantly, records were obtained from Altice, doing business as
“Optimum,” which is an internet services provider, indicating that the IP Address at Defendant
Moreover, based upon SCPD records for the official website Gilgonews.com, a website
maintained by the SCPD to disperse news pertaining to this investigation, Defendant Heuermann’s
home IP Address was used on May 23, 2020, and July 3, 2020, to access the official news concerning
this investigation. Records obtained from JetBlue also show that the same IP address was also utilized
When analyzing the usage of all devices and accounts used by Defendant Heuermann, there
appears to be a clear pattern wherein Heuermann used “burner” phones and “burner”/“junk” email
addresses to 1) contact sex workers and sex partners, to conduct extensive searches related to sex and
24
prostitution, violent, sadistic and child pornography and 3) seek online information about the
authorities investigating his crimes. These burner cellphones and email accounts with fictitious
identities were used in an effort to conceal Heuermann’s true identity, conceal his criminal activity,
unlawfully proposition sex workers, and attempt to monitor the investigation of his crimes.
DNA Analysis of Hairs Recovered from the Examination of the Victims’ Bodies
During the course of this investigation, each of the four victims’ bodies were examined by a
Forensic Scientist with the Suffolk County Crime Laboratory, which revealed as follows:
Maureen Brainard-Barnes
Ms. Brainard-Barnes had been left restrained by 3 leather belts, one of which was utilized to
tie Barnes’ feet/ankle/legs together. During the examination of the belts, a female human hair was
recovered from the buckle of one of the belts by the Suffolk County Crime Lab (hereinafter “Female
Hair on Barnes”). On or about December 18, 2010, the Suffolk County Laboratory this hair and was
able to determine that it corresponded to a “Caucasian head hair fragment.” Although this hair was
not suitable for nuclear DNA profiling at that time, it was subsequently submitted for further DNA
Megan Waterman
Megan Waterman had been bound by clear or white duct tape. During the course of the
examination of Ms. Waterman’s body, two female human hairs were recovered, one “from outside
the head area” and the other from “the tape of the head area.” Both hairs were recovered in the vicinity
of Ms. Waterman’s head (hereinafter “Two Female Hairs on Waterman”). Examination by the
Suffolk County Laboratory indicated that the Two Females Hairs on Waterman exhibited
Caucasian/European characteristics, but were unsuitable for further DNA testing at that time. The
Two Female Hairs on Waterman were subsequently submitted for further DNA analysis (see below).
25
Amber Costello
An examination of the body of Ms. Amber Costello revealed that she appeared to have been
bound by 3 pieces of clear or white duct tape. During the course of the examination of Ms. Costello’s
body, a female human hair was recovered, specifically on a piece of tape, inside of the burlap
wrapping, in the vicinity of Ms. Costello’s head (hereinafter “Female Hair on Costello”). A
subsequent examination of the Female Hair on Costello led to the determination that it had
Caucasian/European characteristics, however, it was unsuitable for further DNA testing at that time
by the Suffolk County Crime Laboratory. The Female Hair on Costello was subsequently submitted
Forensic Laboratory #1
As noted above, the Female Hair on Barnes, Two Female Hairs on Waterman and Female
Hair on Costello (collectively, the “Female Hairs Recovered on the Three Victims”), were all sent to
applies DNA techniques and direct genome sequencing in difficult-to-solve forensic casework and
In or about July 2022, Forensic Laboratory #1 was able to determine that each of the
aforementioned Female Hairs Recovered on the Three Victims each belonged to a female individual
in mitochondrial haplogroup K1c2 and that this female was not any of the victims.
On or about July 21, 2022, an undercover SCPD Detective recovered eleven (11) bottles from
a trash receptacle that had been left out for collection in front of the residence of Defendant Rex A.
Heuermann. The Suffolk County Crime Laboratory took swabs of said bottles, which were
26
Based on these new submissions, on or about February 24, 2023, Forensic Laboratory #1 was
able to conclude that one of the DNA profiles generated from the aforementioned bottles taken from
haplogroup K1c2 (which is the same mitochondrial haplogroup as the Female Hairs Recovered from
the Three Victims). This profile was then compared against the previously-tested female hair sample
recovered on the remains of Ms. Megan Waterman, which indicated that the two “belong to the same
individual or someone closely related.” Based upon the investigation and evidence recovered to date,
Forensic Laboratory #2
On or about March 23, 2023, the Suffolk County Crime Laboratory requested Forensic
independent analysis. On or about June 12, 2023, Forensic Laboratory #2 issued a report concluding
that the DNA sample from the female recovered from the bottles outside the residence of Defendant
Heuermann (i.e., Heuermann’s wife) and the Female Hair on Costello indicated that the
“mitochondrial DNA profile(s) are the same at all compared positions common to and between
samples,” specifically at a rate that would, as per the EMPOP database,5 exclude 99.98%6 of the North
5
EMPOP is shorthand for the “European DNA Profile Group (EDNAP) mitochondrial
DNA Population Database,” which is a web-based collection of human mitochondrial sequence
data from various populations worldwide. The North American database includes 12,386
sequences of North American forensic significance.
6
This statistical analysis incorporates a 95% “confidence level” or margin of error as the
North American database does not include every single DNA sequence of North American
forensic significance, which would require the “typing” of every individual in
the population. See Exhibit B, Statistical Reporting for an in-depth explanation regarding
“confidence levels.”
27
Forensic Laboratory #2 then compared the profile associated with the DNA sample from
Heuermann’s wife to one of the two aforementioned female hairs recovered on the remains of Ms.
Waterman, which also resulted in the conclusion that the “mitochondrial DNA profile(s) are the same
at all compared positions common to and between samples,” specifically at a rate that would, as per
the EMPOP database, exclude 99.69% of the North American population from the hair recovered on
Ms. Waterman.
Based on the foregoing, while 99.98% of the North American population can be excluded
from the FEMALE HAIR ON COSTELLO and 99.69% of the North American population are
excluded from the FEMALE HAIR ON WATERMAN, it is significant that RH’s wife cannot be
excluded from either the female hairs recovered on the remains of Megan Waterman and Amber
Costello. As previously noted, Defendant Heuermann’s wife was out-of-state at the time of Ms.
Waterman and Ms. Costello’s disappearance and murders. As such, it is likely that the burlap, tape,
vehicle(s) or other instrumentalities utilized in furtherance of these murders came from Defendant
Heuermann’s residence, where his wife also resides, or was transferred from his clothing.
During the initial examination of Ms. Waterman’s skeletal remains and the burlap materials,
the Suffolk County Crime Laboratory was also able to recover a male hair from the “bottom of the
burlap” used to wrap Ms. Waterman by her killer (hereinafter “MALE HAIR ON WATERMAN”).
hair was unsuitable for further DNA analysis at that time by the Suffolk County Crime
Laboratory. This hair was subsequently submitted for further DNA analysis and on or about July
31, 2020, Forensic Laboratory #1 was able to generate a DNA profile for the hair recovered on the
28
bottom of the Waterman burlap. Specifically, Forensic Laboratory #1 determined that this hair
Following the discovery of the Chevrolet Avalanche, which was registered to defendant
Heuermann, and the investigation of cellular billing records and other items, on or about January
26, 2023, a surveillance team observed and recovered a pizza box thrown by Defendant Rex A.
Heuermann into a garbage can located in front of 385 5th Avenue in Manhattan (see below).
29
This pizza box was sent to the Suffolk County Crime Laboratory for analysis, where a swab
was taken from the leftover pizza crust. On or about March 23, 2023, the Suffolk County Crime
Laboratory sent the swab from the pizza crust abandoned by Defendant Heuermann to Forensic
Laboratory #2.
On or about April 28, 2023, a detective hand-delivered from Forensic Laboratory #1 a portion
On or about June 12, 2023, Forensic Laboratory #2 was able to determine as to the MALE
HAIR ON WATERMAN and the swab from the pizza crust, that the “mitochondrial DNA profile(s)
are the same,” specifically at a rate that would, as per the EMPOP database, exclude 99.96% of the
North American population from the MALE HAIR ON WATERMAN. Based on the foregoing,
while 99.96% of the North American population can be excluded from the MALE HAIR ON
30
WATERMAN, it is significant that Defendant Heuermann cannot be excluded from the male hair
recovered near the “bottom of the burlap” utilized to restrain and transport Megan Waterman’s naked
On or about the evening of July 13, 2023, Defendant Rex A. Heuermann was arrested by
Suffolk County Police Officers. Searches of his residence, as well as other locations are currently
ongoing. At the time of his arrest, Defendant Heuermann had on his person the burner cellphone 347-
304-2671 which was linked to the Thawk Email Account used to conduct the online searches
described above.
Penalties
If convicted on the current charges, Defendant Rex A. Heuermann faces multiple sentences
Based on the serious, heinous nature of these offenses, the strength of the People’s case, the
life incarceration the defendant faces upon conviction, the extreme measures this defendant took to
attempt to avoid apprehension for an extended period of time, the recent sadistic and child
pornography searches, use of fictitious names, email and cellphone “burner” accounts, online counter-
31