Charles Richet Por Alvarado
Charles Richet Por Alvarado
Charles Richet Por Alvarado
Over the years I have written several articles about Charles Richet’s psychical research,
among them a general overview of his work on the subject, and an analysis of his Traité
de Métapsychique (1922). My last published discussion of Richet is an article in which I
translated and reprinted a chapter from one of his books in which he presented an
autobiographical essay of his involvement with the subject. Here is the reference and the
abstract:
Charles Richet
Abstract
Richet (on the left) in séance with Italian Materialization Medium Linda Gazzera
I wrote:
“Richet was part of this movement, particularly strong in France, that explored the
existence and range of non-conscious human functioning and that included both
conventional and unconventional phenomena . . . This is seen in his writings about
personality changes in hypnosis, unconscious movements, and the induction of trance at
a distance . . .”
Stefan Ossowiecki
“There were also many experiences with various mediums and psychics. Examples were
séances with Eusapia Palladino (1854–1918 . . .) and Leonora E. Piper (1857–1950 . . .).
Richet’s . . . materialization séances with medium Marthe Béraud are well-known, an
episode that generated many controversies . . . Here both full and partial
materializations were observed . . .”
Marthe Béraud
The best known of his works was the highly influential Traité de Métapsychique
[1922] . . . where instead of psychical research he used the term “métapsychique”
(metapsychics), a word he had suggested before . . . In the Traité, and elsewhere, Richet
frequently expressed hope that future developments in science would allow us to
understand psychic phenomena. His popularization and discussion of psychical research
not only continued in other books . . . but also in articles in non-psychic journals . . . and
in newspapers . . . In addition to the above mentioned examples, Richet’s articles in
psychic journals included topics such as statistical analyses of ESP tests . . . , recurrent
doubts in the study of psychic phenomena . . . , the decimal indexing of psychic
literature . . . , xenoglossy . . . , an ancient case of near-death experience . . . ,
premonitions . . . , and survival of death . . .”
“Richet did much to support psychical research in various forums of conventional
science. He opened the door to, and defended the importance of, psychical research in
the international congresses of psychology . . . He was also one of the founders of a very
important French journal, the Annales des Sciences Psychiques, first published in 1891,
where not only French but also authors from other countries discussed psychic
phenomena . . . Furthermore, Richet was a supporter of the Institut Métapsychique
International since its beginnings.”
The article also illustrates the limitations of autobiographies as historical documents. An
analysis of the essay considering Richet’s publications about psychic topics shows
occasional omissions of important information and incorrect recollection of facts.
“Autobiographies, like history in general, are reconstructions of the past, but
reconstructions based on one person’s perspective and motivations, on their priorities at
the moment of ordering the recollections of a lifetime. The latter is particularly an
issue.” Nonetheless, “when used together with other sources of information . . .
[autobiographies] are not only informative, but illuminating of a time period.”
Older Charles Richet