0% found this document useful (0 votes)
88 views

Retaining Wall Design Practice

This document provides an overview of earth pressure theories, including Rankine and Coulomb theories. It defines key terms like active and passive earth pressure, and the coefficients Ka and Kp. For Rankine theory, it gives the equations for calculating the active and passive earth pressure coefficients for both sloping and horizontal backfill conditions. The document serves as an introduction to earth pressure concepts for retaining wall design.

Uploaded by

sophe87
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
88 views

Retaining Wall Design Practice

This document provides an overview of earth pressure theories, including Rankine and Coulomb theories. It defines key terms like active and passive earth pressure, and the coefficients Ka and Kp. For Rankine theory, it gives the equations for calculating the active and passive earth pressure coefficients for both sloping and horizontal backfill conditions. The document serves as an introduction to earth pressure concepts for retaining wall design.

Uploaded by

sophe87
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 84

()

c
c
c
c
(

c
0
c
c
c
c
0
c
(.

c
(

(
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
(

c
(

l
(

(_

( 1
(

m!.f..E_tg (

2
Outline
Introduction

Section 1 - Earth Pressure Theory


Section 6- Piled (Embedded) Walls
Section 2 - Earthquake Earth
Pressure Section 7 - Interface Structural
Design
Section 3 -Types of retaining walls
r Section 8 - Earthquake Performance
.... Section 4 - Stability of Retaining
Walls
Section 9- Practical Considerations

Section 5 - Design of Retaining


Summary
Walls

c
c
c
0
G
0
G
c
c
(.

(
(

l
(

l
(

c
( 3
4
....

,...

c
c
0
G Earth Pressure
c • Vertical Pressure
c =Y.h
c
( • Lateral pressure in the
ground
(
= K. Y. h
(
- Y l.o.NI .....eoo-.. d. JOEl (icN/ml)
- K Coetf\c::iem of uneral e.artn press.ure (dwnenStOnle$.5)
( - • <>epctt(m)

(
(.

l
(

5
(

c
c
(

(
At-Rest Earth Pressure (

• Lateral pressure in c
the ground when the c
soil is "at rest"
(

(
• Ko = 1- Sin 0
(
Where
0 angle of internal fnction of soil c
Note that Ko IS dimensionless
(

(
1/
(
...af Ylllf - u r-e~./!::.fur 19-t:.J' /
(

At Rest Earth Pressure (

(
• Lateral pressure in
(
the ground when the Retaining
soil is "at rest" (

(
• Ko = 1- Sin 0 (

Where (
0 angle of internal friction of soil
Note that Ko is dimensionless (

(
m!.f..EJU
(

6
Active Earth Pressure
• Excavation • Ka

• Wall moves
- displacement
- rotation
- deformation

• Ground relaxes
• Pressure reduces

0
c p,·s /vvt.J.t:t,.._&_ c;lw- f.~~ 1 or"'/ ~., ~
..ft..... ~ f $71?.1 4 .bt.. t/\ ''~f>e " .r fr.k
c
14.- f:., =-9 r~ ~ s{ywl
c (!_ tU.(P"l<l.A /

c
c
c Passive Earth Pressure
c
• Ground pushed against • Kp
c
( • Wall moves inwards
- displacement
( - rotation
- deformation
(
( • Ground pressured
l • Pressure increases

(.
m!..tEJU
(

( 7
(

(
Earth Pressure Theories (

William Rankine. 1857 (


• Rankine Earth Ronkono. W (1M7)0n1htsUit>hryoflooseeoM
Phtlosoptue~t Tt'lnsacbons of the Royal Sooety o' London.
Pressure Vof 147 (

• Coulomb Earth Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, 1776


Coulombe A, (1776) Esuo sur uno opphe.bon des regles
cres mlx•m•s e1m•n•m•s a quelquu ptOblemes de ~~bQue (
Pressure Theory relatlfs a l'archltectul9 Memo•ret de I'Aeadem•e Royale
pres O•wrs Savanll Vot 7

Rankine Earth Pressure Theory


William Rank1ne. 1857
• Rankine Earth Pressure Ronkone, W (1857) On lho sUibol•ty of loose eor11>
Pt'ulosophteal Tren11ct•ons ot the RoyaiSoaety of
London . Vol 147
Scon•lh eng.n.eer

+ Assumed
- Smooth, vertical wall

8
Rankine -Active Earth Pressure

• for sloping backfill


0 angle of tnternal friction of soli
13 backfill slope

c Active eanh pressure coefficient

c
(

0
c
c
0
(, Rankine -Active Earth Pressure
(
• Active state of plastic equilibrium

c.. 1 - Sin 0
c. • Ka =
1 +Sin 0

(.
( • for flat backfill
K
• = tau
, (ts -z<>) = l +siu(¢)
I -sin(¢}
(
0 angle of internal friction of soil
l 13 backfill slope = 0

(.
mlf..EJtl
<..
(

( 9
(

(
Rankine Passive Earth Pressure (

• Passive earth pressure coefficient (

(
• for sloping backfil l
(
• where (

Rankine Passive Earth Pressure '


(

(
• Passive earth pressure coefficient
(

• 2 ( ~) I - sin(¢) (
/\,.= tan 45+2 = 1 -sin(¢)
for horizontal backfill (
K =1 + Sm 0
P 1-Sin0 (

(
• where
0 et~Qie Of ·~ tntoon ol ~ (
• ~ bod<fil slope • 0

10
(

c
(
('
Earth Pressure Coefficients
c
c
0 Earth pressure coefficients are dimensionless

c for
0 angle of Internal fnction of soil • 30
degrees
~ backfill slope ~ 0
c
K0 = 0.5
c
• Ka = 0.33
c
c
(

c
0
0
c
c
0
c At Rest Earth Pressure
(
• Vertical Pressure
c =Y.H
(
• Lateral pressure in the ground ~iii)
(
when the soil is "at rest"
( Po = i<o· Y. H
(
- Y unfl WI!Mght of SQtl l kN/ml)
- K, Coeffioent of at ~ pressure
( - H neog~l of reta1ned sool (ml

(
(

( 11
(

c:
c
c
c
Active Earth Pressure c
• Vertical Pressure c
=Y.H c
• Lateral pressure in the
c
ground when the soil is at c
"active" state
Pa = Ka· Y. H c
c
c
c
c
c
c
(

c
c
Passive Earth Pressure c
• Vertical Pressure
c
=Y.H c
c
• Lateral pressure in the
ground when the soil is at (
"passive" state (
Pp = KP. Y. H
(

<..
(

<.
(

12
c
(

c
c
(

c Coulomb Earth Pressure Theory


c Carried out research when
building forts
('
Considered a limit equilibrium
approach
('
The stability of a wedge of soil
0 and the forces acting on it

( Consider a number of wedges to Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, 1776


derive critical wedge CoulombC A. (1776) E11at sur uno apphcahon des
regtes des INixun•s t 1 mtn.rnts • quelques problemes
( de sttttque ret1t1ts 1 l'aretu1octure MefnOires de
I'Acado moo Royole p<es O.vers Slvonts Vol 7

c French Soentls1

0
c
c

c Coulomb Failure Wedge Approach


c
c
(.

c
(
(
FAILURE WEOGE FOR
ACTIV£ STATE
l ACTIVE PRESSURE ON
BACII OF WALL.

(
Ea!.f..EJU
(

(
~~t 6"'-1:.~ orf~ (/'e~ ~"'k.t~ ~~
~~ YtA/~ 'd ,t..).,._eP)
l ~ VCM-7 ,_s, (~._.,

( 13
(

c
c
c
('
Coulomb Earth Pressure
)I () ~
C, 4'1rI 1•
r- -
J.-t. . -
! II'J....il rn~~h'o-. ~...,i.e.
0 ongle of lntemol kietlon of soil
~ backfill slope
Charles-Augusti n de Coulomb, 1776
(

c
\ •O I) - 9 wall-soli Interface sk)pe

~ ·r Active Earth Pressure Coefficient


Modified by

Mayniel (1908) for wall lriCbon


c
ff\l/"'
MuUer-Brestau {1906) for non·horizonta1 backfill, non-
vertical soit-waU interface c
c
Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient
c
c
(

c
c
c
c
c
(

c
Earth Pressure c
(
Soil with cohesion
(
- Active earth pressure
lTh = l<ot1, - 2cfi<,. (
Passive earth pressure
(
lTh = I<,P., + 2cJKP
<..
- K,. pas.srve ear1h pressure coeff!Cien1 (
- Ov vertlcai etvertM.If'tlen stress

- c OOhesron (

l
(

14
(

c
c
('

('

r Caquot and Kerisel charts r

( Caquot and Kerisel (1948)

c - Used logarithmic spiral failure


surface (instead of planar) 1t

(' - Particularly important for


passive earth pressure
c - Allows for sloping backfill,

c sloping wall, wall friction etc

c
c
c
c
c k J~&fu...R ,;.,~~ .w,i-y. Cfl"'~ +t--;; ~

c
ta ·if' AJ ~"'£. ~o ~ fw- r~ r(p,J..
-- ~J-.A(v4 Auf 1 ,ll~ r 1~.,~ ~~~
c n '~ ~~ ~~ - -~ v-
0
0
c Wall Displacement
c • Wall displacement
c required ...

c • to reduce earth pressure


from at-rest to active
( state
- How much?
(
• to mobilise passive
( pressure
- How much?
(_

(.

( 15
(

c
c
('

c
(

c
c
(
IV,JI wvt!V~
~e~f
p ~',N_. g
c
C~b WI It c
tA}t(.~~
002& 000* cooo o 0001 0009 ooza
t- 1 ISJo. c
Towards soil
(passive) +--------t-----+
WALL loiOIIEMENT /WALL HEl liT-AJH

Away from soil


(active)
c
(

ft.-/ MW '\ /VI"yt'..f I' '(L- ,....,.......eR .,.....?/ ~ ~ f.


G-,,' vt:..-IA
c
f~'v-l... f ~ ..--<... · Jf-rvv.w-u. f1v- rn 11..-<..t. ~ ~"' f , f 0AN~i-
l/-A?f rtA>f- ~ ?,.h'tr< ft-.- (tfvYY1·.,....., I y~~ . L f/vtAd/u../ W'(_
c
~~ svJo 7 fM-47·~ c
r v~y-<_ ~ f. ~~ (

c
Role of Displacement c
• Small displacement required to reach
active state c
- 0.1% to 0.4% of Height
(

c
c
0 049 ocu oeoo. 011)01 0 0001 QCIIM oott (
Large displacement required to reach WAl.L MC)YDIOn' /WALL HeiGHT- c.Af

passive state . (
- 5% of Height (translation)
- 10% of Height (rotation about base)
(.
- More for cohesive soils

(.

(
(

16
(

c
(

(
(
Passive Pressure
0 • Typically take only a
proportion of passive
pressure mobilised

0 • say 50%

c
c
c Fang, 1991

c
0
0
0
0
0
0
c Questions?
0
c
(

c
(

c
(

l
(

(
( 17
(

(
(

('

c
c
c
c
c
c
c
(
(

c
c
c
c
(
(
Calculate earth pressures (

(
Soil 0 ~ 30 degrees
~
Cohesion, c 0
Umt weight, Y = 20 kN/m 3 c
c
• Calculate the earth pressure
distributions on the wall. (

18
(

r
c
/k ~p'rY>s :
c i. 9kff'r.. .-.t ~ --t
c (~·.
-It ""'"""" ?1 s..1-<
lft-'1 m. /'A-t-
A-fA-,"1'£

<yo,'•(.'
f

c ,'s IV"'" 1 "t.·,_..fl


(~~· . .I....,..,.{-1.., -t.v.f, '..-£ w....d
a e:: jcA 'f/1 &· ·n(?-<>)f
21
<>

c 1.o...... - - ~ 2-v ·fJ t- M

c
c
! I.
r~
• 1 - b 'n (? o)
/ -f- y,',., (? o)
"""~· '3)

c f/ . . Jr( H e ~( ~)1·o ~:=., -; J=.,.-' ... .3. 0

• (,o /c-f4.,
('
~Yl1S+-L ~'0 2· ft ~ Jo ;;f.....
c
0
0
c
c
G
0
c
c
c
(

c
(

c
(.

l
c..
(

19
(

Mononobe - Okabe Theory


• Earthquake increment in
earth pressure

• Earthquake decrement in
earth pressure

• Assumes flexible wall that can


displace I rotate to bring active
or passive pressure conditions

20
c
(

c
(

c
(
M-0 Active Earthquake Earth Pressure
c
K =------------~~~==~~==~~
c - COSt,// cos 2 acos{IJf +a+ o{1+

c
c • where
-
-
0 anglO ot wuornol 'nccion of soil
Jl bad<tlll slope
- a slope angle of bad< of wall
0 - 6 waii·S<"I fna.on angle
- \to' se•sm•c tnertta angle

(i - 4' =arctan (k./ (1-k.,.))

c
c
0 t~-,. U/vl·~ ~~ ~~ ~

c tv <- VtN/1~ '--

c
c
0
M-0 Passive Earthquake Earth Pressure
c K _ cos 2(q>-w+a)
c PI - ( .---......--_,.....----.------..-)2
coswcos 2 acos{w- a+8} 1- sin(q>+ a)sin(q>-w+ ,8}
( 'cos{8+w-a)cos(,B-a)
(
where
( - 0 ang• ot ~n1etnel hiec.on ot so•
- p bad<U slope
- o $lOpe angle of bad< of wan
( - 6 waft·SO<I lnctJon angle
- "'I setsmtc: •ner1Ja 1ng1e

(
- 4' = arctan (k.f(1-k.,.))
(

(.

(.

(
( 21
(

c
c
c
Mononobe-Okabe Earthquake c
Earth Pressure Chart c
Charts can be used to derive active (
earthquake earth pressure increments

c
Published in Road Research Unit RRU
Bulletin 84 fYVood and Elms, 1990) ::~
,,~
c
.•;::::==;==t;~:z:;;~~ (
.,.. - ...,_-f"-,_--

k.._., C (0) ; earthquake acceleration coeff•e~enl ~~~§


c
C (0) g =peak ground accefe<a~on
.. c
6KA£ e coeffioen1 of acteve earthquake earth pressure increment
(

c
c
~~·,..__,_.J ,f,j~ fo c--.1~/-<. r0n'c.. t..,. ~ 4t/tr
c
J<r~~ o/J~~ tf ~ cttr ~ Cr-J? -f-In~ 1'\ .
c
kv.. :: o. tf ;';, vv~·"rt-u-n rv~:ro .) (

c
(

Earthquake Earth Pressures (

(
New Zealand research in the 1970s and
1980s led to:
1 !1exible Wall (use M-0 theory)
I c
. Understanding that earthquake earth (
pressures depend on wall rig idity
Wall top displacement of> 0.5% H
(
. Approximate pressures published for
stiff and rigid walls (

. Published in Road Research Unit


RRU Bulletin 84 (Wood and Elms,
1990)
H-l h1'11, •!K;,c-1(,, '51;
AP.ot • t~:~~~AL lH1
""*'' l:lll,oe- K:.c-K• (

(
m!.f..E_~
(

22
(

c
(

c
c Earthquake Earth Pressures
c
Stiff Wall Rigid Wall
Wall top displacement of 0.2% H Rigid Wall that does not displace.
c
c
c
0 SMf ....u
C (0) = earthquake acceleratoon coeffiCtent

C (0) g = peak ground acceleratiOn


G
c
(

c J J..~~f,'u_ 1 ~~ (Y..t.V:.{&..,._C:._tf VV~ tJ ~~ ~~b~


. - " IL . A~ ~if(
c tf fw.. W,J!l fl j?~fc-{ I 'rV'"" I,N'.......c.-< ~A
I /. . .
(/(0< Y>f?V.AI,/ .A-"
• • /"
J'1 eA.
J..t v.--.1-e ~-f f1N ~,, ~ ~f/V?f" Y- Pv-
0
~Nt~rf-... F""u. , ~ ~ fv--~Jrrt',(.J( ~'r/-v.~"'/J'n-.. ~ ~-
c
0
(J Questions?
c *' Hrv... d)1 F~~l<. (IV~ ~ jfv, '~r-,.f',.., . . .
c ~AlL, 4r r~~ff, 17 r·~~{ Pr
( "",J..f 7 d ·S'j. H ft",.L( 0.-pflfL (<.1-S}If- /rt~ c. O·Z.."j, If
-
c 1/f/ - ...

c
(
(
(
m!.f..E_~g
(

l
t
(
( 23
c
(

c
c
(

c
c
(

c
(

c
c
c
c
(

c
Exercise 2 (

(
Calculate earth pressure
distributions on the wall Retaining (
wall
Where
(
0 angle of Internal friction I
~ 30 degrees 3m : (
Y unit weight of soil
• 20 kN/m 3
(
Design peak ground acceleration
a 0.4g ( m/s~ )
(
~,tMt- c (0) ~ 0.4
7/:: g gravitauonal acceleration (

(.

24
r

r
~(l'ry-t
r I.· t.' 't''p( ~ ~f Yt.11f
/co ~ /- Yl~ I
:: I - ;,'v, (~·}
r ry~arn· ,f ~"'-

c ti'. S~fh ~ v.vo.A'c-R. ~


c ...
-f..t,..,..f., ~

((I
~ bAt~f't/1 ? "vpf~w..,/A--..
0
P' ~rAt~
c
c
c I

c
c
c
0
0
c
(
(

c
(

Types of retaining walls (

Simplified explanation of typical retaining walls (

r:::=.-0::
...........
,.,..._ ,Ca.otilhH" waU _.,.._
c!::=-...-::
...... -.. ---
Aoc-bortd wa.ll •--~-
....,_tor.,..
-·-
(

, 11111111 ,,,,,,,,,,
________ ....,.._ ..... ..... ____ ____
lT
_..,....,_,... ___ .....
_-------·-
_..,. c;.o -----------
.....
...,.
---------
.,
.,.
., _
-------·----
:=:-.·:.::.::::: ~=;.

also Reinforc.e d soil wall

26
r

c
r
c Gravity Walls
('

('

c
0
c
c
c m!.f..E_tg
c
c
c
c
c
0
0 Gravity Walls
(;
- ~l.-Jc ~.J.P. 1 ~ J~ w4
(

c
(

(
(

c..
mLtE_tU
(

27
Crib Wall

dn.,W\Ihi.I *""""J
akpC.w-.. .,
.,..,.._"' I1'Wft

CO"'C"'- ....,....., _.,


IOcorrKI boiUr

Soldier Pile Wall

28
(

r
r
(

r Timber Pole Wall


c

0
c
c
c
c
c m!f..EJU
0
G
c

0
Concrete Soldier Pile Wall -
anchored
c
c
c
c
c
(

(
(

( 29
(

(
Cantilever Retaining Wall (

Common Termlnology (

<

Propped Concrete Wall - top and


bottom

30
r
r
[

c
Anchored Concrete Retaining Wall
r
0
(

c
c
c
(

c
(

<.:
0 ~ 1 ~, fw._,>U-(..
~h. ~h; f<--n...eil. tr
c ft<r "1 .- fo J.c PriJ ~ f.
c ( ttf~ vrvvv~ ~ jqIA-,tvw .
c

c Reinforced Soil Wall


(.

c
c.
(

(
(

c
c.
(

(
(

( 31
(

c
c
Reinforced Earth Wall (

c
(

m!.f..E_tU (

Questions? (

<
(
mJn...ru

32
(

c
r
(

c
c
.hr'i /~ ~~ ~~~
c r=w u ~ !n )/;1 7-r
0
0 /~
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
(

(!

c
(

c
(
(

( 33
(

c
(

34
c
c
(

c
(

(' Exercise 3.1


Property
c Select a retaining wall
Boundary

type and configuration ??


0 1 What
! type of
j.,, wall
~
c \

~- ~--------~--------~
,; I

0
:i:
1: I
Fill
; I

c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
_,. ~~~ P7~ , ;..
(J ~C-~i-'1 ~ v~ af
c /Zv.. ~ (?4 ~ ;-r-
~~.
c - ~·UA ~~ D\.-C.. ~ ~ fl' ~v.oY_
c v-/c ;v..,-y ~ p~'y<.. f~Y<....
7!Jf StJtAAnutV : ~/\~ 41C-/h ~fct~
(,

(
(

(
(

c
(
( 35
c
c
(

c
Exercise 3.2 (
Property
Boundary
Select a retaining wall (
type and configuration (

~f !}! ~'o~ t~'r.f (

I/Vf-(A fa · ll1w ~ ~rf..-vf (


A ...,,JJ R ~I~ jA-..__ (
~'( S'~bu r VJiv.~~
(
~ try< fH- ~jt. ~"'
(
;..__ / ·,. ~·-- ./.
(

'JOf Jn.Aft.n nJ ·. /)l<'!J /..~ VV,.j_p KV


hwtv~-f: ttv-J= vvJ..P

36
(

c
0
(

0
( Exercise 3.3 Property
Boundary
0 Select a retaining wall
type and configuration
0
0
0

c
c
0
0
0
0
c

~ y~I/VI\'-)1·~ . J-k.~llltJ i ~N~I


c ~~~
c
c
(

G
c
(

c
(
mLf..E...'U
(

( 37
(
(:

r
c
c
(

c
(

Mechanisms of Failure- Gravity


c
Wall c
(
• Sliding
(

• Overturning
(
• Bearing capacity ...
l
l
• Global stability
(

38
c
r
(
('

0
Mechanisms of Failure
(
(

{c) Overturning Faflutt


0
(

c
ldl Btorlng Capoclty FaHurt
0
0 After Hong Kong Geoguide 1 (1994)

G
0
0

0
0
0
c Loads on Retaining Walls
0
• Self weight • Earthquakeloads
c - Earthquake increment
(; I decrement of earth
• Earth pressure
pressure
G
- Seismic inertia force
( • Water pressure
(
• Friction
l
(.
mlf..EJU
(

( 39
(

c
('

Forces acting on the wall (

Assume
c
• Water pressures are fully drained
• Smooth wall
c
• Horizontal backfill c
• Surcharge uniformly distributed, q
c
c
c
c
c
c
;:,_p i
1'\.lA., 11 Pve_ w .e-.. ·"J tr-t I frvu-.J c
cc") [w4't·~]
c
c
c
c
Forces acting on the wall c
c
(

c
(
+ +
(

c
Ka . Y. H
(

(
(.

40
c
c
c
c
c
c Analyses for Stability
c Sliding Overturning
_... ~

0
Force equilibrium Moment equilibrium
0
Forces resisting sliding Forces resisting overturning
c > Forces inducing sliding > forces inducing overturning

0
(

G
(J

c
c
0

0 Wall Friction and Sloping backfill


(
• Virtual back of wall {slv:tM~,"r.,) ~
c wj f-N-~1~ ~w4/?- vir-~ ~A fCM7 i ..ftv. w..d r>-;s'
(
• Wall friction 1fv- Y' b~
( s:: 1
J tto,l-h ~i r·(;t,~

( • Inclined active thrust


(
.. ,_._ A

•• •
c
(
(

(
( 41
c
c
c
c
(
Questions? (
t)VIblht,VV1,·~ ~ ( ~~~P<{:-t)
(
,__., ,.......,
c

t>
#,l;±;:~
-z:M.:o-0) ?-'1(-1)CJ-) r ~~-· Z-(1/s) -i(4,_ -t 12/a-t/) [2.·2--~)f- ~ (o 4j{o-~)
c
c
c
t'h( 0·4) {0·1>) j 'Z-S'· ~2 t"{O·s;- -t )~ · ~ f 3 1 6-:: ~ (I J. 1./l-. c
i(~)~ ·o'fl~ t Z<>(O•I/)(1-v) t }O(O ·tl) I· ~C f 4~(p·{)(2. zr) c
c
c
fl-t'ch'b ~ { .!rh-f.::, Ca.¥) c
s.?,·p[.·~ s-f,,,,·tA·~ 7 · Hl~4) f -£(2-1-~)1 = rz,.,~
g~~,.,'t-;e;,' 9?7., f{.)110·o) -r 1?-(o ·us) c
0
av'-lAf!AVJM'~ ~L ( r-<.A·f'YI.-v>·~ c~)
... 11>3 ?SlJ~f'<>~
c
c
c
c
c
c
(

c
c
(

<.
(_

l
(

42
c ~ srfob1 h~ : a-- o) /
3 ·n}(~ -t i {21- If) 1+ f.~~· Y)1 + 1r,- ¥' M
/ /

c / - f. {51)J o~f4s-(qz) / ~ #1 ~ .c) - e ~


c (p a. """'th.fJ.. <a<~f-<. h . 1-f, I<.J ..- ./
(' vfu-<l , ·'- · ~ ! ~ Vv.d1 l ~5 ~,_s~f-~
w..tt
~~
~~ ~~~t~
C' Calculate earth pressure ~ Vv1 ) ( -ftv-
C' distributions Uw"/),'> f,'r., f f""" ~V< ~
~ fl-1 f t--o''Y''<-G-( /o
c Umformly distributed load 12 kN/ m2
'i
=
Soil 0 35 degrees
..
05m ;.._._ !~
f4nv't.f~r<_
Soil cohesion 0 = t
Unit weight of soil = 20 kNim3 1
(' =
Unit Weight of Concrete 24 kN/m 3 m :
3
Design PGA =0.4g
c Friction factor - base concrete I soil =0.65
1
1
I

c I

c
c .dktc:::• z.o
C(tJ)
G LJI<,(• ...o<J
/
c

0
c -- . . ----- ;

c 3 .0

G
~ _l w,,
c A A~~1 -"" ·- w..
c !J!:r~ -6 l- t-r Y~-+l-
1?-rff-v
c ~ 3-1-(z.)i. 3h :: {2-( 4 z:r)" 3 J-'{/cr..._ /
(
,_= -1-y ~(),_
f-. ~'tift. /=.oo?; H-1 .. O· ~r( ~) 1~ ?.f.~ bf,., /
c -= (flJllt >·r -D·'l )1- o(~)
(Jfct?J. ~ ~~-, o·rr, uf) )1-=- 3r, ·8 ~::rA.. /
, se !=ft:(,
y

(
(

(
/VOlf= : l4e ~o,_ f ~-n ern~. 0~ r~ ·s) {Jf)"' 1z.PfJ
(;VC.d -:.

l f>\ t.,P.. hC. ~<.. lf{,_::. 2-s(cJ· >) (7Af):. ;o~tJ


tv5 " ( 2. -S - U· >) () .s-('h) ._ l-ohJ
( ~-=- 'j2-{er} / 43
p_-
(
(

(
(

c
c
c
(

c
c
(

(
(

Retaining Wall Form (

(
• Consider purpose
(
• Relationship with other
structures {

(
• Construction methods on the
site
(

• Performance expectations (

(
m!nJu
(

44
c
c
c
r
c
c Site Constraints
0 • Ground Conditions

0 • Property Boundaries
0
• Aesthetics
0
• Economics
c
0
c
c

0
c
c
0
0
0 Ground Conditions
0 • Geology & Geomorphology
c • Site reconnaissance
c
• Engineering geology
() mapping

( • Geotechnical investigations

(. • Laboratory testing
(

c
l
l
(

(
( 45
(

c
c
Soil Parameters c
• Understanding of geology c
• Geotechnical investigations and
field testing
c
-
-
Static Cone Penetration Test
Standard Penetration Tests
c
- Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests
c
• Laboratory Tests
(
• Experience in similar conditions
c
c
m!!..~tU c
(

c
c
c
c
Design Loads c
(
• Earth pressures
(
• Surcharge
- Adjacent buildings I earthworks c
- Traffic loading
(
• Groundwater conditions
(

• Earthquakeloads c
(.

(
mLt~tU
(

c
(

46
[

c
('
Groundwater ?
c • Important consideration • Precautions

0 • Current groundwater levels • Can the groundwater drainage


fail?
0 • Would construction alter
groundwater regime? • Maintenance of drainage
c • Can the groundwater be
measures

drained? • What if a water main breaks and


0 floods ground?
( • Can drainage measures cope
with storm conditions?
0
c
c
0
0
0
c

0 Ground Levels
c Current ground levels
c
• Changes during construction
G
c • Temporary cases during
construction
c • Excavations during service life
( - eg for installing utilities

(
(,
(

l
(
( 47
(

Legal/Boundary /Insurance matters


When ccnsuuew>g a retaon.ng wall near a boundary. be
nmc!fiA 01 exactly whefe that reta ..ng wall ,. to be
located II the reta.nong wallrs mrsplace<l. " CO\Ad
encroech onto a nergl>bounng pt01>0rty /WaiWIIhonpr~

In cases where a retamtng waD Will be constnJCted near


8 ~dary , 1\ IS recommended that a survey be /Allow for accurate poSI~onmg wtthrn property
obl"'ned to allow rt to be posrnoned accurately Thrs may
be reqUired by the temtonal authority
/ Assocoated c~taonage etc also "'th'n property
Remember tNt not only the wal!otself. but also the
assOCiated wocks suCh as dra&nage. need to be placed
Wlthtn the property boundary
II on shared boundary, hOw recorded - easement or
/ simtlar
If a retaining wall ts to be a shared boundary wall that •s
k>cated across two neighbouring properties. then
~~~~~~ ~R~":' ~r~~n~:~ ~~:':Je;:'!'!ment. /
W1thin property to grve certatnty over ownetsh4p and
using a Similar arrangement to a party wall lnSUf'ance

https//Www bu1ld1ng govt nz/assets/Uploadslresolvmg·problemsldetermlnatlons/201512015·003 pdf


https//Www bulld1ng. govt nz/assets/UploadslresoiVlng·problemsldetermlnauons/2007/2007·67 pdf

48
r
c
c
c
(' Earthquake Loads
............ ._...._.. . ..,............_.
( / • NZS 1170.5 Earthquake Actiqns ,
..................... a..en.......
...___.,_ ....,_-
.,._ __...., .... .--..----
[-===-==~=-----·
----.1
..-....-
v ~'f~n';;;5 t::/;~~.~~1 .......
""'--~----..--..---.--
0
·-
• Canterbury: MBIE Guidelines,
November 2014- for residential
________ ___ __
0 =~.:..::;:-.:..;::.:-=::::=-=-:
structures in Greater _____
---
..........
_ ......
..,._:.c::!-..---~-·
_,_.......,.
._.e-------.---..---
....... ....,_..,__...,.
__ _____
c Christchurch
----
...........---~
......,
..-.-------·--' __ _
.......
..... .. ....
....... --.-...- .......-._,...,.
c • NZ Geotechnical Society
Module 6 (2017)
_.---
.._
0
_____________
-- __________
..._... __
,....,
====::::=--=--==-~:=-
,,__
.....,_--·-·-·......-
(

c
• Bridge Manual (NZTA, 2014) for
highway and road structures
·-
G
c
c
c

0
0
0 Earthquake Design Guidelines
c • New guidelines under
development
c - by NZ Geotechnical Society
& NZ Society for Earthquake
c Engineering and MBIE

c • Will provide specific


guidelines for use nationally
c
• Currently Bridge Manual
( provides good guidelines

l
(

( 49
c
c
r
c
('
Peak Ground Acceleration from NZS 1170.5 (

• C(O) = Ch(O) . Z . Ru . N(T,D) C(O) design acceleration coefficient c


. z zone factor
Ru
N (T,D)
return period factor
near fault factor
c
Z from NZS 1170.5- table or map
c
N(T,D) =1 for ground acceleration c
li'§3hii :mJI,t).J. Ertl!JM Return Period Factor
c
A, B rock 1
c Shallow soil 1.33
(
1.000 yrs 1.3
0 Deep soil 112
E Very soft soil 1 12
2,500 yrs 1.8 ('

c
c
c
c
c
c
c
Earthquake Motions c
(
• Peak Ground Accelerations Derived from relevant guidelines
or standards
(PGA) (

• Assess critical acceleration,


(
Assess likely displacements using
when Factor of Safety for fu ll PGA and published methods (
sliding equals 1 (eg Jibson, 2007, Ambraseys &
Srubulov, 1995)
c
• Simplified approach using
• MBIE Canterbury guidelines or (
factored down PGA to allow for NZGS Module 6
limited displacements
(

c
(
(

(
(

50
(

r
r
c
r Earthquake Displacements
( • Bridge Manual extract showing
acceptable displacements for
0 highway situations

0 ==--==-
.........,_........ ,_
- _
__
c
c
....... _....,.
--.
.......
___....,.....
.-MOJ>1100
_
..._,._,.., •• a . .. -... ,."""

......
:.::::.:.:~-
,.....
--
&-.:

._

c ~::.,.-::--"---
( -
.OAA)i<Jl(IO -

IO Ma .................... - ............. ., . . . . . _,._ .. ._.,.....,.,. ....


IO ANif• . . ......,-. . . . ..,_......_.
Cll) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . -~...., .. ...._ ........... ·- · ~

c
c
c
c
0
0
0
c
c
c
( MBIE Guidelines for Christchurch
c and NZGS Module 6
(
(

(.

c
l
(

c 51
(
(

Retaining Walls in Residential c


Situations (

DO rr:':""_______/
DO
j · -------'

c
After MBIE (201 4) Guidance on se1smic des1gn of reta1mng structures for res1den11a1 srtes m Greater
Chnstchurch

/.rrt c
H .v:.;'; r) ~w
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
(
v.... ___.... ................... .
.......................
....... .......,. ...... ...,....,.......,01',........ C811*'

..._ ,~ .... ....,..,


..............
,_... . . . . . .,. . . . . . ..........
....., ....... ~.~)111)&)

....,.,.~
b. _~--Ca.t

. . . . . t . . . . . . . . ......_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -...... (

--........
~-NlS--1

.....,.....
~
......... ................
T..... \NIIollllt . . . ........... ~t/ll"'lt _. WJJJj

.....................................
~
..., (

_-
.._ .....,.~ ................. Ceog.._

--
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~c.etj

,..........................fill.,. .. W4 (
............ ....... ,...be .. ~--.-.

.
e.. Cow
.,...
... ...
W\111(. . . , , . . , . , .. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . ~
--~kat~ ~ )

52
c
c
0
G Retaining Walls in Residential
c Situations
0
Tat». 2.: WaHdlspbe.tn..m f~c:tot, w., fOf' pseudo-stadc du.Sgn of
f"•s•CS.ntbl r•l:al'nlng W.lfb l n Cbrbt.chureh Pon Hills fOf' Ul$

c... L ....
0
(lr...,Tobl• ll
ease l 2
I 07

J+l=
I C:ase I~ OS
· ~2 05
0
0
taseJ
C:ase ~
cases
c-e
2
05
04
03
0.3
Ern
---·-
......-::::::

0
r-:J~
0
0
0
().f- C/?/\Mf~ ~ (7J 11-1M c/A ~~~
c 0 ·) ~~ fr, jn,.,....-.... .
0
0

Retaining Walls in Residential


c Situations
0 • Topographical amplification
0 • (after Eurocode 8, Part 5)

(J
An 01111Plrfte:abon factor~ should be apPbe<llO the ~lid ground design acce~rotlon USing Equollon 12 tn

c the lolow1ng Sttuauons


• For dl1! featwes >30m tn hetghl. " - = 1 '2 at the chtf ~and 1he ~on top of the clltl of Width
equal to the heighl ollhe ci1f

c • For ndg~ lines >30m In hetghl With aest Wldlh Slgnlficanlly leu !han base Wldlh. and llllefa!je slope
aogl~ grea~r !han =
30 ckgrl!t'S. " - 1 4 at the crest dmn5hlng to uruty at the base

c • For~ lines >30m tn hetghl wrlh crest wldlh ~nlly leu than base Width, and .weroge $lope
onglf! gre:.tet than 15 ~~ and less thal1 30 degrees, ~ :: 1 '2 ot the uest drnlnlshlng to ur.ty

c •
at the base
Fonveroge $lope angles ol less than 15 degrees the l.ll!l09mphy "llectS may be negtected
C(T,A...,) • C(T)A_. (Equa110n 1.2)
(
(
(

( 53
c
(
(
('

Retaining Walls in Residential c


Situations (

c
c
.. •C(TJI..JW,
flwlld>
c
11,•~111-.....corl!loonllot~<klllflll

w•• ~~-._. .. roble2 (

c
c
m!.f..E..ti~ c
c
c
c
(

(
Questions? (

(
m!.f..E..ta
(

54
c
c
c
c
(I

0
0
0
0
0
c

c
0
0
0
c

0
0
Design Approaches
0 Consistent with structural design
• Load and Resistance approaches
c Factor Design 81/ VM4 provides an example

c Difficult to apply to some cases - like


soldier pile walls

c...
• Achieve specified factors of safety
(

( • Limit Equilibrium
approach using Factor of
( safety

c
c 55
c
c
(

c
Load and Resistance Factors c
Tat..l a 1

IMd_.........
StrMteh R.d«1:aon F.cton f~ S haUow Ftlouf'Mh,IJeR 0-'tn
Pwi'I9'IIIIC:Ih )~ 1 c
... ___
Fot........,. ,._,
lold~~~l.~toflgll\

/ti.O!'Wia.s~
I« ...... ...~ ........., __,_
.nd I>Mo'lli~ Ml1h '" ....... ••.,.

080 - 010
c
c
c
. . . . ~ ._.,_.,..,.,-...,. -..'It
L..;.~CJt

LOidl.tolr fa -...c...,__,.....,_
I0

••
c
t.McJt.ao-klr~tiiW'f'I1."W'UUIl""""_...,...

~~f«wa::r~tnd£0.._..1..... ,.....
10

c
Extracts from Building
Bode 81 I VM4
010
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
Questions? (

Lf_h) N f-3. . P.-t--r·;~ ? (

(
Tfs· ~~~ ~ ~ ~---~ f
1
(
~~ -;;~~bhvs
{4~ t'/" L~ ,';. ;~volvJ (

(
Frv ~ t,N~ ~~ ~~ ~ G-~ (
~ pt - ~~ ~0<-c-k, .y;-.·~
(
{ e- ~, 8-' // s/v~rL.''o) ,/-i f~K ~ ~F .s.
(
m!.f..E...tU
(

56
c
c
c
(

0
(I

c
0

()

0
0
0
c
c
0

0
0

0 Sheet Pile Walls


0
(

c
(

(
(
(

(
(

l
(

( 57
(

r
('

('
Soldier Pile Wall (

c
c
c
c
(

c
c
c
c
c
c
c
(

c
Timber Pole Wall c
(

c
(

c
(
(

58
(

c
c
(

0
c Mechanisms of Failure
c
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Sheet Pile Wall
c
c t
I • Simplified Approach
c H
I
I
I
I
I
I
• Calculate Zo from
0 I
I overturning stability

(
• Take D = 1.2 Zo
(
(

(
Ea!.f..E_tg
(

c
(

( 59
(

c
c

c
(

c
c
c
c
(

c
c
c
(

c
c
Exercise 8.1 - Sheet Pile Wall (

t
I =
Soil 0 35 degrees
c
4m
I
I
I
1
I
=
Soil cohes1on 0
Unit weight of soil = 20 kNJm3
c
I
I
I
(
Design PGA = 0.4g
(

<.
(

60
('

c
(

c
c
c
(

c
c
c
c
c
c
0
0
c Sheet Pile Wall
c
c So1l 0 = 35 degrees

c Soil cohesion = 0
Un1t weight of soil =20 kN/m3

(
Des1gn PGA =0.4g
c
(

(.

(_

( 61
(
(
('

c
('

c
(
(

c
c

c
c
c
c
c
c
(

c
Soldier Piles c
(
• Active pressure mobilised on
full retaining wall width (

• Passive pressure mobilised on (


embedded pile width only?
f,M/~ ·to- .. . c
• Passive pressure can be taken (
on 3 x width of pile, due to
3 dimensional effects (

l
(.

(
(

62
(

c
0
(
('

('
Soldier Piles
0 Pile relelnlng welle (ahoring)

0
0
0
c
c
c
0
0
0
c
0

c Timber Pole Wall


c -
-·... lttol_ .....

A type of soldier pile wall


(;

(;

c
(

(_
--
·-
-
(_
m!.f..EJU
(_

( 63
(

c
c
c
c
c
c

c
(

c
Exercise 8.2 - Timber Pole Wall c
(

=
So1l 0 35 degrees
c
=
I

2m:
I
Soil cohes1on 0
UM weight of soil = 20 kNJm3 c
Design PGA =0.4g (

<.
(

64
c
c
c
(

0
c
0

0
0
0
0
0
c m!.fJJg
0
0
G
0
0
0
0
G
c
c
c
(

c
(_

l
m!.f.tN..l
(

l
(

( 65
(

c
c

c
c
c
c
(

c
Interface with Structural Design c
(
• Need to ensure good interface
with structural design (

• Need to calculate loads, shear c


forces and bending moments
(

(.

(
(

66
c
c
('
(

c Anchors for Walls


c
G • Important to ensure durability

• From Bridge Manual

c
( ._..,.ud.,.c•-•E_..
__. n._..-,•.,_..,.,.....,
DNIIr _ _ .., ........ , .......... """"""-
.........,~---CJAI-·-...­

ldt

sqtt----·..-!lt~~.~..-­
_,.._\bi.ITIIM)oi"'•ASNOJIC.,., .......... , _....
..... .................. ,.., .. ..........
c ,...,....w...~- ~
. . . . . . . . . fA .................. ~ . . . . . , ............ ~, . . ...,..

0
c
0
0

0
c
c
c
(

(
(

c m!.f..E..~
(

(_

(.

( 67
(
(

c
(

c
(

c
(

c
c
c
c
Performance in Canterbury
c
Earthquakes c
(

(
Ea!.f..E_til
(

68
c
c
c
c
0 Performance in Canterbury
c Earthquakes
c
0
0
0

c
c

0
c
0
c
Performance in Canterbury
0
Earthquakes
c
(

0
c
(
c
(_

(.

( 69
(

c
c
('

(
Performance in Canterbury
Earthquakes (

c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
(

c
Kumamoto Earthquake, Japan c
c
(

(
(

70
(

c Kumamoto Earthquake, Japan


c

G
c
c

0
0
G
0
0

0 Wall displacement
c
c
c
(

c
(

l
l
(

(.

c 71
c
(

c
(

c
Discussion of Design (

• Keep wall flexible and " • Reduces forces on the wall (


accommodate displacement
c
c
• Post-yield ductility of anchors c
c
o /)tJ u-of uM_ I f'l ~.sir·~ at< c, tvvv~
c
~ (/V)'/1 ~k_ f2-rW 0'-p~ ,.( fro& -sir~ fA-oil
1/!~
1M"
p<-..t ~
c
c
c
c
(

c
c
c
c
(

72
(

('

c
('

c
('

c
0

Design Features to Enhance


c Performance
c • What features can we use to
c enhance stability?

c • Long term performance?

c
(

(
(.

c..
(.
(

(
J h.J -1 ~1/1 1 fo 1o ~ r ~ r~ ~~~ ~'ot'-o ~ -ft,~
(

(
-'J1J c~1
!--11./> g():A-
73
(

Sloping Ground in Front c


c
c

c
c
(

c
c
c
c
(
Sloping Ground in Front c
(

(
• Consider passive
wedge in front that can (
be mobilised
(

(.

(.

<.
(.

74
c
c
c
c
c
0
Tiered Walls
c

c
0
0
0

c
0
c
0

0
0
c Tiered Walls
c
(

c
(
(

c
(
(.

l
(
(

( 75
(

Tiered Walls
~lx [u.< r£f
/IYrn.Y€ Y ~~e_
~ ~1'14'(
/A~(

76
c
c
("
('

0
c
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c Summary
G
• Earth pressure theories • Effects of displacements
c
• Earthquake earth • Dependence on wall
c pressures on wall stiffness/ displacement
c
• Types of retaining walls • Suited to site constraints
c
( • Stability of retaining walls • Sliding, overturning ,
bearing capacity, global
( stability

(.
(

(,
(

( 77
Summary
• Design of retaining walls • Performance
expectations
• Form- wall selection
• Soil parameters
• Constraints
• Design loads, earthquake
• Ground conditions, loads
geology
• Sliding , overturning,
bearing capacity, global
stability

Summary
• Design approaches • Groundwater and
drainage
• Structural interface

• Earthquake
performance

78
c
c
c
0
0
Questions?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
c
c
0
(

(.

(.

l
(

c
(
( 79
NOTES
NOTES
NOTES

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy