Procedure 32 - 8 Stages
Procedure 32 - 8 Stages
TITLE
UPDATES
Pages
Rel. Effective from Amendments description
Amended
1 2014/07/18 First release for CNH Industrial All
EMEA
DRAWN UP Gaetano Bonanno Business
Process
Business
CHECKED BY Massimo Testaquatra
Process
Head of
OWNED BY Piero Blunda Supplier
Quality
Global
MANAGED BY Fabiana Bobba
Planning
APPROVED BY
SUMMARY
1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................ 4
2 8 STAGES OF INCOMING MATERIAL ............................................... 4
2.1 Activities and Ownership .......................................................................................... 7
3 CURRENT PRODUCTION ................................................................. 8
3.1 Part number classification ........................................................................................ 8
3.2 Supplier classification .............................................................................................. 10
3.3 Project priority definition ........................................................................................ 12
3.4 Process Control Map ................................................................................................. 14
3.5 Process Evaluation (8 stages) .............................................................................. 16
3.6 5 Questions for Zero Defects ................................................................................ 18
3.7 Stage Target................................................................................................................ 19
4 KEY INDICATORS ......................................................................... 21
LIST OF ANNEXES
1 PN Classification Table
2 Supplier Classification Table
3 S&P Matrix
4 Process Control Map
5 8 Stages Table
1 PURPOSE
Define activities and responsibilities aimed to consider Customer & Supplier process as unique,
common and tuned to satisfy Customer Quality expectations, minimizing costs.
Following procedure integrates World Class Manufacturing methodologies with CNH Industrial
procedures.
This procedure shall be applied only on those components / characteristics for which has been
previously decided to operate with the “8 stages” method.
In accordance to 8 Stages of Incoming Material approach, Customer & Supplier are considered
as a unique and common process tuned to satisfy Customer Quality expectations, minimizing
costs.
The aim is to move from the lower to the higher Stages, shifting controls from product to
process causal parameters, making more robust the common process.
Following Table details per each stage, which are the main requirements for Customer plant /
Supplier process to assure 100% of components conformity to final Customer.
SUPPLIER CUSTOMER
Production Inspection Inspection Production
Stage
Department Department Department Department
0 - - - -
1 - - - 100% inspection
2 - - 100% inspection
The additional Stage Zero (0 - zero) have to be considered proper stage to allocate a part
number in case of occurred not-conformity.
As a consequence of an occurred not-conformity each CNH Industrial Plant has to react as
prescribed by 08018 Norm and Procedure no. 16 and as per the additional norms defined by
each CNH Industrial sectors.
Must quickly move from Stage 0 - via Stage 1 and 2 - to Stage 3, moving the activities out of
the CNH Industrial Plant, then move step by step up to Stage 8.
In case of a containment in place, e.g. CSL1 / CSL2, the requested percentage of checks
before delivering parts to Customer plant is equivalent to a Stage 3 / 4.
CSL status shall be managed in accordance to 08018 and Procedure 16.
In the Reactive phase the priorities are given by QA Matrix/Suppliers Table and the first aim is
to remove the non conformity; each CNH Industrial Plant has to react as prescribed by related
procedures.
After the non conformity has been removed (for one or more characteristics), the P/N enter in
the preventive phase.
In the preventive phase must be considered also all the other Part numbers which are
managed in the Plant and for which there hasn’t been recent quality problems (or there hasn’t
been quality problems yet). The priorities are given by the S&P Matrix.
Supplier process
Supplier / Supplier
improvement to reach PDCA
Quality
8°Stage or Target Stage
3 CURRENT PRODUCTION
8 Stages from a “Current Production” environment must judge the number of characteristics to
include. The balance is between including as many as needed without overburdening the
process.
Moving from part number drawing, the characteristics to include should consider:
- all significant characteristics already defined by Engineering
- those additional, if any, considered “critical” by Customer Plant (for example known to
have been a problem, customer or Plant).
The significant characteristics have to be listed and detailed as shown in the following
spreadsheet:
Per each characteristic proper “rank” have to be assigned, taking into account the potential
effect of the not-conformity from a Customer prospective.
Safety/Homologation/ Regulatory AA
Functionality
Comfort A
Cosmetical/Aesthetical
Assembly/Workability B
Other C
Responsibility:
Responsibility
Customer Plant shall classify Suppliers in accordance to the rules following described, at least
once per year:
Supplier performances are evaluated taking into account PIQ (ex IP/E), key performance
indicator defined by 08018 procedure.
For CNH Industrial, suppliers are ordered by considering their performances (from the best to
the worst) then properly stratified in three main subgroups.
Variable A value is directly assigned per each subgroups following the guidelines below
described:
The Chrysler Group LLC equivalent standard is the Supplier Quality Bid List scoring:
Above 80 = Green Variable A = 1
60-79 = Yellow Variable A = 5
Below 60 = Red Variable A = 10
Supplier collaboration
Objective metrics are adopted to properly evaluate Supplier collaboration; guidelines are
following briefly resumed, with reference to 08018 procedure:
Low Supplier Collaboration: Suppliers usually do not answer within 36 working hours
from Quality bills, notified from Customer plant as a consequence of not-conforming
parts delivery, not-conforming documents or documents not sent.
SQP bills “Item 19” ≥ 4 Variable C = 10
Then Supplier classification (D) is calculated multiplying values of variables A,B,C (AxBxC=D):
Supplier 1
……………………….
15
Supplier class D
AA > 100
A 26-100
B 6-25
C 1-5
If Supplier is delivering different part numbers from the same location, final Supplier
classification “rank” can be considered the average value of D.
With reference to current production, project priority has to be defined through the use of
Supplier & Part numbers matrix.
Supplier classification
AA A B C
P/N classification
AA
Responsibility:
Red status represent parts delivered by poor performing Suppliers with potential safety or
functionally related negative impact to the Customer. For these reasons red status has to be
considered top priority. Then, as a consequence, will be taken into account yellow and green
part numbers/Suppliers.
Note: The S&P Matrix must be used only to define projects priority, not to measure improvement.
Supplier Quality shall map Supplier process detailing, per each process step, different type of
controls adopted to check / monitor significant characteristics defined.
Control in process step Improvement
FEATURE Actual Stage
Stage
At Supplier In Plant
Due date
Receveing During Output Before Receveing Line: Line:
Description Characteristic Line: Output
Inspection Production Production Expedition Inspection before assembly in process
In the FEATURE column shall be listed all significant characteristics tracked by the Part number
classification table, refer to Fig. #3.
Columns related to Supplier process controls have to be filled by Supplier and then verified by
Supplier Quality during process audit.
Following table gives rules to describe different type of controls adopted by Supplier /
Customer plants:
Process Control are defined as the sum of all the activities performed to monitor the
parameters of machine components which could affect product Quality level.
The difference between Stage 6, 7 and 8 can be better explained referring to the following
statements:
“In stage 6 still all the parameters are not identified, so there are not yet reached zero
defects (in the process).
In stage 7 the suppliers identified all the parameters to guarantee sustained quality so
you so you get 0 defects in the process but they don’t have clear maintenance scheduled
to sustain what they have achieved.
In stage 8 suppliers also have maintenance scheduled to sustain their process capability
into the right zone”.
Then at “Stage 6” many quality parameters are identified, but not all, affecting product
Quality and as a consequence in process scraps are still generated but controlled in the
process. Controls on the defined machine parameters are in place.
At “Stage 7” all parameters of each machine components affecting product Quality are
identified/known and no defects occur in the process, but the activities of “self-
maintenance” and “professional- maintenance” don’t guarantee sustaining zero scraps
conditions.
At “Stage 8” all parameters of each machine components affecting product Quality are
identified/known, no defects occur in the process and the activities of “self-maintenance”
and “professional maintenance” to sustain zero scrap conditions are fully in place.
Once mapped the process, it’s required to allocate the part number to the proper Stages.
With reference to process control map (example fig. #7), process Stage is driven by the lower
Stage identified of all the characteristics.
Conformità molla
L T 5
T
Corretto
orientamento tubo
guida L 5
Corretta tipologia
di cuscinetto L T 5
Ø boccole
U
XYZ
4
fissaggio (FC2)
U
Errore posizione
boccole fissaggio 4
(FC2)
Presenza o-ring
L T 5
Presenza fermaglio
T 5
Five Questions for Zero Defects needs to be applied to validate the actual process robustness
and all ‘improvement actions’ effectiveness.
A minimum score of 80% for each 5QFZD is considered robust and sustainable.
A score of <80% cannot be closed and must be improved.
Theoretically per each part numbers the Stage Target has to be considered the 8 th or at least,
with reference to the figure below (Fig. #12), “green area” achievement.
These are the targets to be considered if not differently specified by:
AA
B X X
C
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Stages
8 Stages approach requires pace and rigor to be fully implemented till the achievement of the
target.
Responsibility:
Supplier Quality is responsible to set Target Stage for each Part Number.
AA
B X X
C
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Stages
4 KEY INDICATORS
To evaluate the 8 Stages effectiveness, at least following KPI and KAI have to be tracked: