Consistency Commitment Revised
Consistency Commitment Revised
Balance Theory
• People strives for consistent
psychological (balanced) state.
• When there are inconsistencies, people
will strive to regain balance.
P=person, O=other, X=object
+ -
+
Methods of Maintaining Consistency
• Denial
• Modifying attitudes
• Bolstering/making excuses
• Differentiation
• Transcendence
• Communicating
• Bargaining
Marketing Tactics Using Consistency
• Have your cake and eat it too!
• Brand loyalty: Accept no substitute
• Active participation
• Marketing inconsistency
• Tell how your product fits into the existing
cognitions
Commitment
• Commitment is how the force of
consistency is engaged in persuasion.
• Some examples
– Cognitive Dissonance Theory
– Foot-in-the-door
– Low-balling
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Festinger
• Basic premise: cognitive consistency
• Three possible relations between two
cognitions
– irrelevance
– consonant (consistent)
– dissonant (inconsistent)
Key Predictions of CDT
• When two cognitions are in dissonant
relation, the person is said to have
dissonance.
• Dissonance is an aversive motivational
state people want to get rid of
dissonance.
• Dissonance vary in magnitude the
bigger the dissonance, the bigger the
motivational pressure.
Magnitude of Dissonance is
Influenced by…
• The proportions of consonant and dissonant
elements
• The importance of the elements or issue
• Free choice/insufficient justification
• Amount of efforts required
Example
Law school at UHM History graduate school at UW
• Active
• Effortful
• Public
• Freely Chosen
- No external justification
Application: Hypocrisy Induction
• Calling attention to the inconsistency of a
person’s attitudes and actions can arouse
dissonance.
• The feeling of dissonance motivates people to
change their behavior to restore consistency
leads to increased attitude/behavior
consistency
• Two conditions for this effect to occur:
- Salience of the relevant attitude
- Salience of past attitude-inconsistent
behaviors.
Foot-in-the-Door
• Start with a small request, then move on to a related larger
request
• Small commitments manipulate a person’s self-image.
• Once the self-image has been changed, people will
naturally comply with larger requests that are consistent
with the new self-image.
• Timing a time delay between their agreement to perform
the first behavior and the second behavior is necessary
so that people have time to think about the cause of the
behaviors.
• Effect of explicit social labels People become more likely
to comply with the second, larger request, when their initial
compliance is positively labeled also when it was
negatively labeled when they can refute the claim that they
are unhelpful.
Low-balling