EC304 Seminar
EC304 Seminar
Week 3
Mode of analysis
Research question: what are they trying to find out?
Analytical premise: what explanatory factors do they think are important?
Methodology: how do they evidence and demonstrate their argument?
Source:
Journal of Political Economy
Publishes work in ‘economic theory and practices’ in areas including fiscal policy,
international finance and industrial organization.
Have you looked at the origins or impacts of any policies before? If so, what ‘mode of
analysis’ did you employ?
Notes:
Rule-based policy: there is an objective approach (depoliticize)
Economic paper: usually refine the existing model
Political paper: question the existence of the model
Taking input and placing it in the context of an existing model to analyse impact (mechanistic
approach with quantitative data); politics might ask whether such a mechanism is credible,
and why it works in such a way.
Positivist study (take the world as it is) as opposed to critical or normative (question power
relation, mechanism) study.
Each discipline can bring different themes to the foreground and harness different
methodological strength.
Week 4
Assignment
News
Government proposal
Annual report
Personal Experience
Notes
Activity
From April 2023, the benefit cap amounts were increased for the first time since its
introduction – by 10.1%, the same percentage increase as for social security benefits linked to
inflation.
To promote a fair and healthy society and maintain public confidence in the welfare system,
by imposing a reasonable limit on the total amount a household can receive.
To reduce spending on benefits and encourage positive behavioural changes.
To encourage more people into work.
Stakeholder
– poor household
- Government
Week 5
Contextual description:
“Following record high oil and gas price over the past year due to global circumstances, and
to help fund more cost-of-living support for UK families, the government is introducing the
Energy Profit s Levy, a new 25% surcharge on the extraordinary profits the oil and has sector
is making” (Treasury, 26 May 2022)
Policy rationale
How are we sure that fiscal policy can convert to the objective?
What difference will an implementation make?
Stakeholder analysis
Unintended consequences
Start with the title and the abstract, this should give you a fairly good idea on
DiD design
No aggregate effect
Minimum wage policy can play a critical role in reducing racial economic disparities
Research question
- Necessity: a question we need an answer to
- Novelty: Something new (the world is changing)
IV
- Instrument needs to affect endogenous variable
- But uncorrelated to the error term
DID
- Compute difference between unemployment in two areas before and after.
- Difference in cross sectional and time series data (panel data)
Week 9
Many actors are involved, but who are the one that you are focusing on and why
Sources of evidence
The September 2022 mini-budget contained £45bn of tax-cutting policies such as lowering
the top rate of income tax and cancelling the planned increase in corporation tax. Amid
adverse market reactions and criticism from expert authorities, just a month later these and
many other policies had been reversed, Kwasi Kwarteng had been sacked and Liz Truss had
resigned. Let’s say we want to argue that the mini-budget was informed by the ideas of
certain right-wing think tanks (policy rationale), which then publicly defended it in the media
(stakeholder analysis). Can you find an appropriate source of evidence to this effect? What
precise claims would you be able to make?
Kwasi Kwarteng has a long association with Bow Group, one of the oldest right-wing think
tanks; but it doesn’t suggest a causal relationship, hence requires more build-up.
Inference from source, but also be self-reflective on why that is the case: care there other
reasons?
Writing style
How should the policy case study be written differently from these three sources?
1. The Wikipedia entry in the ‘September 2022 United Kingdom mini-budget’
2. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIEST) blog on the
Truss/Kwarteng Mini Budget One year on
3. A chat gpt response to the prompt Explain the origins and outcome of the 2022 UK mini-
budget
Determine an overview of the argument; don’t cite Wikipedia – it is not analytical but
descriptive. It does highlight some important quotes that we can trace back and cite.
No argument – but descriptive, opinion base. The organisation’s own response show that they
disagree with the budget; we can cite that for context of not all think tanks support the
budget.
Term 2 week 1
Policy
Policy rationale
Criticism of the policy
Politics on punishing the incompetent who take the opportunity or alleviating the poor
(pension, benefits)
Term 2
Week 3
Reflection on first assignment
Week 4
Take Higher education funding and identify different problems that have been and could be
attached to it. Consider problems for different groups and problems in different contexts.
Brain drain
Week 5
Economic Data
Labour policy
Education policy
Population by highest degree
Years of schooling
Share of people able to read
Gender gap in educational attainment
Database: census data from different countries, world bank, ourworldindata, European
commision
Healthpolicy
Life expectation
Child mortality
Health expenditure, public, private
Fertility/ mortality
Prevelance of diseases (malaria, influenza, smallpox, etc.)
Mental health
Database: WHO, Centres for Disease control and prevention, OECF, Ourworldindata
Housing policy
House prices
Rent
Share of homelessness
Overcrowding
Rental stock
Amenities
Environmental policy
Week 6
The data we need depends on the problem we are dealing with and the proposal we want to
make. Let us assume we are convinced about the economic merits of a tax on red meat. How
could we make the case that this is politically feasible and desirable in the UK?
Parties have different ideologies and agendas; perhaps it is not a policy for now and
will be when there is a change in government.
How much does the government give weight to stakeholder positions and opinions?
Academic evidence shows how policy is formed and whether stakeholders hold an
important position.
- Policy lessons, from similar policies in the UK or the same policy in other countries
Case study
Switzerland look at red meat tax
Compared to the EU, people in switzerland will have to pay 2.3 times more for red meat
consumption
General perception that the government shouldn’t define or dictate people’s food choice
Swiss buy more and more meat across the border
Limited effect
A three year consecutive of increasing the price of meat, appetite for meat decline by around
2 percent per capita.
Food tax are not effective in reducing nitrogen surpluses as consumer do not react uniformly
towards an increase in price, overall impact is minor
Week 7
Presentation
Week 8
Ask
Week 9
Process evaluation
Quantitative evaluation
- Data analysis of food waste statistics before and after policy implementation (measure
of food waste in UK)
- Government tax revenue and cost of implementation - Cost benefit analysis = whether
this is the best policy to implement.
- Collective strategy
Qualitative evaluation
- Interview with the policy implementors – enforcement and regulatory environment
that is suitable for the policy
- Active monitoring and the necessary human resource for it; measuring food waste/
ideal infrastructure – food waste bags
- Media coverage
- Exposure to policy
Prevention should focus on household as they constitute the major proportion of food waste
in UK
Notes
Contextual description
Stakeholder analysis
Policy evaluation
- How to make sure policy is a success – Do A, B , C
- To assess with policy – matrix A, B, C
- What is the policy gap that cannot be determined thus far
Week 10
Contextual description
Past effort
Country to country performance
Is there any public support
Government support
Policy rationale
Evaluation