Scribd
Upload
213 views

Waiting For Godot

The play Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett exemplifies the key elements of Theatre of the Absurd. It portrays the absurdity of human existence through two characters, Vladimir and Estragon, endlessly waiting for someone named Godot without knowing why. The play lacks a traditional plot structure and leaves questions unanswered, highlighting the meaninglessness of life. Fragmented dialogue between the characters reflects the breakdown of communication and their isolation. Through its use of absurdity and symbolism, Waiting for Godot offers a bleak portrayal of the human condition without purpose or meaning.

Uploaded by

lisper kerubo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
213 views

Waiting For Godot

The play Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett exemplifies the key elements of Theatre of the Absurd. It portrays the absurdity of human existence through two characters, Vladimir and Estragon, endlessly waiting for someone named Godot without knowing why. The play lacks a traditional plot structure and leaves questions unanswered, highlighting the meaninglessness of life. Fragmented dialogue between the characters reflects the breakdown of communication and their isolation. Through its use of absurdity and symbolism, Waiting for Godot offers a bleak portrayal of the human condition without purpose or meaning.

Uploaded by

lisper kerubo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

"Waiting for Godot" by Samuel Beckett is often cited as one of the quintessential

examples of Theatre of the Absurd. This genre, pioneered in the mid-20th century,
presents a worldview where human existence is depicted as essentially without purpose,
rationality, or meaning. Here's how "Waiting for Godot" exemplifies the key elements of
Theatre of the Absurd:

1. Absurdity of Existence: The play portrays the absurdity of human existence through its
plot, which revolves around two characters, Vladimir and Estragon, who wait endlessly
for someone named Godot, without knowing who he is or why they are waiting for him.
The futility of their waiting underscores the senselessness of existence and the human
condition.
2. Lack of Plot and Closure: "Waiting for Godot" lacks a traditional plot structure and
resolution. The characters engage in repetitive and seemingly meaningless actions, such
as trying on hats, contemplating suicide, and engaging in nonsensical dialogue. The play
ends as it begins, with Vladimir and Estragon still waiting for Godot, leaving the
audience with a sense of unresolved tension and unanswered questions.
3. Language and Communication: Dialogue in "Waiting for Godot" is fragmented,
disjointed, and often nonsensical. The characters engage in circular conversations,
wordplay, and misunderstandings, highlighting the breakdown of meaningful
communication. Language fails to convey clear meaning or establish connection
between characters, reflecting the inherent isolation and alienation of the human
condition.
4. Absurdity of Time and Space: Time and space are distorted and ambiguous in the
play. The characters are unsure of how long they have been waiting or where they are
waiting. The setting, a desolate landscape with a single tree, lacks specificity and
becomes a metaphorical representation of the barrenness and emptiness of existence.
5. Symbolism and Metaphor: Various elements in the play, such as the tree, the
characters' hats, and the character of Godot himself, serve as symbols and metaphors
for existential themes. Godot represents an elusive and ultimately unattainable salvation
or meaning, while the tree symbolizes the passage of time and the inevitability of death.

Through its use of absurdity, repetition, and symbolism, "Waiting for Godot" embodies
the principles of Theatre of the Absurd, challenging traditional notions of plot, language,
and meaning, and offering a bleak yet thought-provoking portrayal of the human
condition.
The eternal question returns: what to do while waiting? Estragon suggests
that perhaps they could hang themselves. That would certainly put an end to
their waiting. Hanging also has another incentive: it would excite them
sexually and cause each to have an erection and an ejaculation. But the
matter of hanging creates some problems. Vladimir should hang himself first
because he is the heaviest. If the straggly tree does not break under
Vladimir's heavier weight, then it would be strong enough for Estragon's
lighter weight. But if Estragon went first, the tree might break when Vladimir
tried it, and then Estragon (Gogo) would be dead, and poor Vladimir (Didi)
would be alive and completely alone. These considerations are simply too
weighty to solve. Man's attempts to solve things rationally bring about all
types of difficulties; it is best to do nothing — "It's safer." Accordingly, they
decide to "wait and see what [Godot] says," hoping that he, or someone, will
make a decision about them or that something will be done for them. They
will make no effort to change their rather intolerable and impossible
situation, but, instead, they will hope that someone or some objective event
will eventually change things for them.

Beckett's characters are tied together by a fear of being left entirely


alone, and they therefore cling to one last hope of establishing some
kind of communication. His plays give the impression that man is
totally lost in a disintegrating society, or, as in Endgame, that man is
left alone after society has disintegrated. In Waiting for Godot, two
derelicts are seen conversing in a repetitive, strangely fragmented
dialogue that possesses an illusory, haunting effect, while they are
waiting for Godot, a vague, never-defined being who will bring them
some communication about — what? Salvation? Death? An impetus for
living? A reason for dying? No one knows, and the safest thing to say
is that the two are probably waiting for someone or something which
will give them an impetus to continue living or, at least, something
which will give meaning and direction to their lives. As Beckett clearly
demonstrates, those who rush hither and yon in search of meaning find
it no quicker than those who sit and wait. The "meaning" about life
that these tramps hope for is never stated precisely. But Beckett
never meant his play to be a "message play," in which one character
would deliver a "message." The message here is conveyed through the
interaction of the characters and primarily through the interaction of
the two tramps. Everyone leaves the theater with the knowledge that
these tramps are strangely tied to one another; even though they
bicker and fight, and even though they have exhausted all
conversation notice that the second act is repetitive and almost
identical — the loneliness and weakness in each calls out to the other,
and they are held by a mystical bond of interdependence. In spite of
this strange dependency, however, neither is able to communicate
with the other. The other two characters, Pozzo and Lucky, are on a
journey without any apparent goal and are symbolically tied together.
One talks, the other says nothing. The waiting of Vladimir and
Estragon and the journeying of Pozzo and Lucky offer themselves as
contrasts of various activities in the modem world — all of which lead
to no fruitful end; therefore, each pair is hopelessly alienated from the
other pair. For example, when Pozzo falls and yells for help, Vladimir
and Estragon continue talking, although nothing is communicated in
their dialogue; all is hopeless, or as Vladimir aphoristically replies to
one of Estragon's long discourses, "We are all born mad. Some remain
so." In their attempts at conversation and communication, these two
tramps have a fastidious correctness and a grave propriety that
suggest that they could be socially accepted; but their fastidiousness
and propriety are inordinately comic when contrasted with their
ragged appearance.

Their fumbling ineffectuality in their attempts at conversation seems


to represent the ineptness of all mankind in its attempt at
communication. And it rapidly becomes apparent that Vladimir and
Estragon, as representatives of modern man, cannot formulate any
cogent or useful resolution or action; and what is more pathetic, they
cannot communicate their helpless longings to one another. While
failing to possess enough individualism to go their separate ways, they
nevertheless are different enough to embrace most of our society. In
the final analysis, their one positive gesture is their strength to wait.
But man is, ultimately, terribly alone in his waiting. Ionesco shows the
same idea at the end of Rhinoceros when we see Berenger totally
alone as a result, partly, of a failure in communication

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy