Module 1 June 21
Module 1 June 21
2021/22
EDITION
A qualification for the P&I industry
produced by the International Group of P&I Clubs
Module 1
International Group of P&I Clubs, 3rd Floor, 78/79 Leadenhall Street, London, EC3A 3DH
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means
(electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher.
DISCLAIMER
While care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information, no warranty of accuracy is given and users of that information are expected to
satisfy themselves that the information is relevant and suitable for the purposes to which it is applied. In no circumstances whatsoever shall
the contributors or the International Group of P&I Clubs be liable to any person whatsoever for any loss or damage whensoever or howsoever
arising out of or in connection with the supply (including negligent supply) or use of this information.
Contents
CONTENTS
Introduction IV
Examination VI
Appendix 1 127
Introduction
The content of this module forms part of the P&I Qualification (P&IQ) programme but
may also serve as reference material.
This module provides candidates with a high level review of the main features of the
shipping business, its importance in global trade, the regulatory environment in which
it operates, and the background to maritime law and marine insurance.
Assumed knowledge
None assumed.
To succeed in the examination of this module you should take note of the learning
objectives for each chapter and the knowledge rating key below.
Learning objective
Your objective should be to learn the content of the chapters to the level required by
the knowledge ratings.
Certification requirements 2
Limitation of liability 2
Limitation of time 2
Examination
Exams are held twice a year in May and October.
The syllabus is examined on the learning text in this module. Unless specifically stated
in the learning text, students will not be examined on the appendices.
CHAPTER 1
SHIPPING AND WORLD TRADE
Chapter 1
Even today with the development of modern forms of transportation such as aircraft,
90% of world trade still travels by sea for the simple reason that it is easier and cheaper
to move large quantities of goods by sea, even though sea transport is not always the
quickest.
There are 44 countries in the world that are enclosed or nearly enclosed by land
(“landlocked”). Given that historically this was regarded as a position of disadvantage,
international agreements have been reached to provide those countries with access
to the sea. One example of this is the convention that made the River Danube an
international waterway by granting sea access to Austria, Hungary and Slovakia. The
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea now gives landlocked countries rights
of access to and from the sea. Even if a country has a long coastline, not all of it may be
readily accessible. In the case of Russia, for example, the northern ports and some in the
east are severely weather limited. This is the reason why access to warm-water ports in
the Black Sea was historically so important for Russia.
Historic maps show various regular trade routes across the oceans of the world and
this concept of a regular pattern of linked ports continues to this day. Local traffic will
move close to the coast, generally in smaller vessels, and some of those vessels will
act as ‘feeders’ taking cargo to and from larger ports which act as hubs for the vessels
performing the long-haul routes. Often these hub ports are the only ports in the region
that can handle the scale of vessels used in deepsea transportation.
If we look at this map of one of the routes that Maersk advertises in its schedules, we see
that, over a regular cycle, a route is taken which crosses from Asia to North America.
Busan
Vancouver
Seattle
Shanghai
Xiamen
Yantian
Kaohsiung
VANCOUVER, SEATTLE,
Canada United States
From Dept\Arr SUN TUE
KAOHSIUNG, Taiwan TUE 19 21
YANTIAN, China THU 16 19
XIAMEN, China FRI 15 17
SHANGHAI, China MON 13 15
BUSAN, South Korea WED 11 13
© A.P.Møller-Mærsk A/S: a Danish company with a fleet of more than 500 container
vessels as well as a significant presence in the tanker trades.
See their website www.maersk.com.
Action Step: Check the websites of other shipping lines to find out what
information they provide about the routes their vessels take.
Commodities are goods which are bought and sold by traders around the world,
generally in large quantities or ‘bulk’. They fall into several main categories. While
a considerable portion of world trade consists of finished products coming, in
particular, from Asia-Pacific to North America and Europe in containers, sea carriage
is particularly suited for the carriage of raw materials because of their sheer mass.
This makes it commercially unviable to use other forms of transportation to move the
volumes required around the world.
Crude oil
This commodity tends not to be produced in the areas of the world that consume
the majority of it. Hence, North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific are all net importers,
despite the USA having access to both the Mexican Gulf and the Alaskan oilfields.
In 2019, the top ten net crude exporters (not necessarily the same as the top ten
producers) were Saudi Arabia, United States of America, Russia, United Arab Emirates,
Kuwait, Iraq, Iran, Kazakhstan, Nigeria and Canada.
Map of the crude oil trade showing the main trade routes
Different types of crude oil have different viscosities. It can be a major challenge to get
it safely to its destination and then to offload the complete quantity there. Practical
problems arise from the necessity to keep it fluid enough to avoid it clinging to the
tanks and pipelines of the ship. Some crude oils are nearly solid unless kept at a
reasonable temperature. Should the cargo not be carried at the right temperature,
difficulties are likely to arise at discharge and there will be the potential for claims
from cargo receivers for short landing. It is virtually impossible to empty the cargo
tanks completely. Some so-called ‘unpumpable residues’ will remain on board
and this factor is well recognised in the industry. It is also possible that claims will
arise between shipowners and charterers for delay in redelivery of a ship or the
presentation of a ship on the following voyage with unacceptable dirty tanks.
Petrochemical derivatives of crude oil may not have the viscosity problems of crude
oil, but their safe carriage poses a variety of problems arising fundamentally from their
high potential for ignition and explosion.
Gas
The term ‘gas’ generally refers to one of two generic groups of products, namely
liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG).
LPG consists mainly of propane and butane and is non-corrosive, odourless and
colourless. Propane boils at -43ºC and butane at -0.5ºC. LPG is generally transported
both chilled and compressed so that it maintains a liquid state.
LNG consists mainly of methane and boils at a far lower temperature than LPG
(-160ºC). Reducing either of these gases to a liquid reduces their volume considerably
(by 600 times) thus facilitating transportation from the production location to the final
destination. Transport is carried out by purpose-built vessels.
LNG and LPG both require liquefaction terminals in the exporting country and, at the
other end of the journey, receiving or regasification terminals in importing countries.
Action step: Review the website for Dragon LNG and see how natural gas is
used in the UK, both domestically and commercially.
Coal
This is produced principally in Australia, Indonesia, Russia, China and South Africa and
is exported principally to Japan, Germany, India, Italy and Turkey.
Unless coal is transported in the correct way it may start to heat up during the voyage;
all coals have the potential to self-heat. In the case of some types of coal this can lead
to self-ignition. For many years, hull and machinery insurers made it a requirement
in their contracts (a ’warranty‘) that Indian coal would not be carried because it was
particularly susceptible to self-ignition. Further, coal can emit noxious gases and,
depending on its sulphur content, can also corrode the ship itself.
Ships’ Masters must therefore take care when carrying coal. In particular, the quality
of air in the holds needs to be monitored. For some coals, ventilation should be
absolutely minimal and for others it needs to be greater. In any event, the holds need
regular monitoring. Ideally, the vessel will be fitted with a system which allows the
quality of the air in the hold to be monitored remotely.
If the vessel is carrying coal with a high sulphur content and its hatchcovers are not
watertight, water which gets into the holds can mix with sulphur to produce sulphuric
acid. This will corrode the ship.
Ores
Iron ore is exported predominantly by Australia, Brazil, South Africa, Canada and the
Ukraine. The vast majority of it is exported to the Asia-Pacific region in particular to
meet the increasing demand of the Chinese steel mills.
The safe carriage of ores is subject to the IMO’s Solid Bulk Cargoes Code (IMSBC Code)
but a number of ores, particularly if ground very finely, present a greater danger to
the vessel than the standard cargo. Should these ground ores exceed their optimum
moisture content, the vibration of the ship can release the water within the cargo,
creating an unstable slurry in the cargo holds.
This process is called liquefaction and it can seriously compromise the stability of the
vessel, particularly in rough weather.
Masters need to be watchful of this type of cargo and to familiarise themselves with
the types of cargo indicated in the IMSBC Code that have a tendency to liquefaction.
Those cargoes can be carried safely if their moisture content is below the critical level,
that is, below the ‘flow moisture point’, and the shipper must certify to this fact.
With these types of cargo it is of paramount importance that the vessel is weather-
tight throughout the voyage.
Cement
Cement is produced principally by countries such as China, India, the United States of
America, Turkey, Brazil, Russia and Saudi Arabia, and, given its use as a basic building
material, is imported in most countries.
Large shipments will tend to be in bulk but cement can be carried both as bagged and
containerised cargo. It is important to take into account the various different grades of
cement when it is carried in bulk, as they differ in their specific gravities and therefore
in the volume of each that can be loaded.
Some cements are very dusty cargoes, so the chance of their contaminating other
cargoes or shoreside facilities is high. Care should be taken at loading and unloading
to cover other cargoes to prevent contamination.
Fishmeal
Fishmeal is also extremely pungent; it can be a major taint risk to any other
cargoes being carried. It can be carried in bulk, bags or containers, but the need for
watchfulness in relation to cargo heating is equally relevant for all three methods. It is
recommended that the temperature of the cargo be taken no less than three times
per day.
Fertiliser
This commodity includes cargoes such as guano, chalk, bonemeal and dried blood.
A fertiliser is a product that is added to soil to provide nutrients for the plants being
grown, so most fertilisers have the same basic chemical components in varying
proportions. The leading urea exporters include China, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the
Ukraine, Iran and Egypt. Fertilisers are mostly carried in bulk. This enhances their
hygroscopic (water-attracting) potential, and when they dry out again they can cake.
Any fertiliser containing ammonium salts or urea must not come into contact with
alkalis and if heated, they will start to decompose, giving off toxic gases.
When carrying these cargoes, care must be taken to ensure they do not come into
contact with hot surfaces such as steam pipes or cargo lamps. Furthermore, no hot
work, such as welding, should be done in the vicinity of fertiliser cargoes.
Clean holds are very important for the carriage of fertilisers. Residues of cargoes such
as grain are of particular concern as there is a danger that, if the grain is diseased,
the fertiliser will also become infected. If the fertiliser were then applied on land the
disease or infestation would potentially become far more widespread.
Foodstuffs
Wheat is exported to Africa, northern Europe, Saudi Arabia and the Asia-Pacific region,
principally from the United States of America, Canada, France, Australia, Russia and
Germany.
The safe carriage of grain and related products is governed by the IMO Code for
the Safe Carriage of Grain in Bulk (SCGB). It is very important that, at the time of
loading, the holds are completely clean – no loose rust scale and no residues of
previous cargoes can be allowed even if they were grain cargoes. Insect infestation
can be prevented by appropriate fumigation. If the cargo arrives contaminated, cargo
interests will bring claims against the carrier.
The stability of the ship during loading is vital. Grain loading is subject to detailed rules
and regulations contained within the SCGB Code. Failure to comply with these can
lead to delays, additional claims and costs which might fall on either the shipowner or
the charterer.
Soybeans are primarily produced in the USA, Brazil and Argentina and are shipped to
the Asia-Pacific region and northern Europe.
Cocoa is mainly produced in the Ivory Coast, Indonesia, Ghana, Nigeria, Cameroon,
Brazil and Ecuador and is shipped practically everywhere in the world.
Sugar comes in two forms. Sugar beet is viable in northern climates, and sugar cane
requires a warmer climate. The main sugar-exporting countries are Brazil, Thailand,
Australia, India and Mexico. It is shipped everywhere in the world. Although beet sugar
can be grown in colder climates, over 75% of the world production comes from the
cane form.
Coffee. The top five coffee exporters are Brazil, Vietnam, Indonesia, Colombia and
Ethiopia. The largest importers are the USA, Germany, Italy, France, and Japan.
Sugar, coffee and cocoa suffer from a common problem when they are transported
in bulk by ship. Condensation damage is a real risk in this trade because cargoes
usually come from a warmer climate to a colder one. Cocoa and coffee both have
a tendency to sweat and give off moisture if not ventilated properly. Sugar attracts
moisture (including that given off by a sweating cargo) and can also suffer very badly
from moisture damage. Cargo carried on a vessel with poor ventilation or without
watertight holds risks arriving severely damaged at destination.
Fresh fruit and vegetables: Much of what appears on the supermarket shelves
today has travelled a long way to get there, often by ship. Fruit and vegetables are
living organisms, so they ‘breathe’, giving off carbon dioxide. If this respiration is not
controlled, it will create heat. This will cause the fruit and vegetables eventually to
rot and decompose. This natural tendency is what insurers call inherent vice - a
characteristic or intrinsic attribute of the commodity concerned.
Often the challenge for the shipowner is to manage the various needs of different
types of cargoes, even if they are all fruit and vegetables. Apples need to be carried in
a certain way, bananas in another and citrus fruits in yet another. Each cargo must be
kept away from any other that it might damage or be damaged by.
Where a cargo arrives damaged by inherent vice, the loss will probably fall upon the
cargo owner. The reasons for this are:
• carriers by sea may have a specific defence to claims for inherent vice under the
contract of carriage.
Cotton
Cotton is exported mainly from the USA, India, Australia, Brazil and Uzbekistan, and is
exported mainly to China, Indonesia, Turkey, Bangladesh and Vietnam.
Steel
Steel is a key commodity. It is used for the building of ships and forms an important
part of many manufactured items. The world’s largest steel export producer is China
followed by Japan, South Korea, Russia and Germany.
As the semi-finished items will be further processed at the place of destination, they
are not generally wrapped for shipment but should be given some protection against
moisture by a coating of oil or grease. Even some stainless steels are not immune to
rusting to some degree so that even unwrapped items need to be protected from
moisture. Finished items should be appropriately packed.
Both finished and semi-finished steel products are prone to damage through bad
handling, particularly by loading machinery.
Motor vehicles
Motor vehicles – both commercial and private consumer-based – are a major export
and import product for many countries. The principal exporters of motor vehicles are
Germany, the USA and Japan.
The map shown above is an example of a typical car carrier trade route (in this
instance, Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics), where the voyage brings vehicles from Asia
for discharge at European ports.
Containers
The use of a standard size metal box in which to transport goods on different modes
of transport was invented and patented in 1956 by Malcolm McLean, the owner of a
large US trucking company. He wanted to speed up the slow process of loading and
discharging cargo on a piece-by-piece basis, the norm at that time for moving cargo
from trucks to trains, to ships and into warehouses.
The basic concept of containerisation is simple. The container is a standard size steel
or aluminium box which is robust enough to carry a variety of various cargoes, to
withstand being loaded and unloaded from different means of transport and to bear
the weight of other containers being stacked on top of it.
Over the last 50 years the standard dimensions of a container have remained more
or less constant: 20 or 40 feet long, 8 feet wide and 8.6 feet high. A basic 20-foot
container is described as a TEU (twenty-foot equivalent unit) and this is the measure
in which the capacity of all container ships is stated. A 40-foot container is therefore
two TEUs.
Although originally developed for dry cargoes, containers now exist in a number
of specialist types, generally conforming to the standard external shape and size.
Containers are also now available for carrying liquids and refrigerated cargoes as well
as those of unusual shape and size, for which a container with no top (an ’open-top‘
container) or open sides (a ’flat rack‘) is appropriate.
• Asia to Europe and Australia – car parts, electrical goods, clothes, and toys;
• Australia to Asia – meat and dairy products, metals, timber, scrap metals;
CHAPTER 2
MARINE HAZARDS
Chapter 2
• Currents
• Tides
• Overfalls
• Whirlpools
• Waves
• Swell
• Storm surges
• Freak waves
• Tsunami
• Wind
• Katabatic winds
• Windstorms
• Fog
• Ice
Favourable tides, currents and winds during a long voyage can reduce the voyage time
significantly, reducing the amount, and therefore cost, of fuel and other consumables
used during the voyage. Additional cost can also be incurred if a ship has to ’take the
long way round‘ to avoid bad weather, fog or ice, although by doing so, the ship may
avoid even more costly damage to itself, its cargo or its crew. The safe and efficient
navigation of ships involves the use of sophisticated satellite, weather forecasting and
routeing services by skilled navigators to ensure that the voyage is conducted in the
most efficient and economical way.
Currents
The oceans are in an almost constant state of flow. There are two types of ocean
current:
Coriolis effect
Currents in the northern hemisphere are pushed to the right due to the Coriolis effect
caused by the rotation of the earth. In the southern hemisphere they are pushed to
the left. This circular motion creates ‘gyres’, circular currents found in all ocean basins.
Tides
Tide refers to the rise and fall in sea levels caused by the gravitational forces exerted
by the moon and the sun on the earth as it rotates each day.
The height of each tide is primarily affected by how close the sun, moon and earth are
to being on the same axis. Atmospheric conditions and prevailing winds also affect the
height of tides.
Normally, there are two high tides and two low tides in each day. The ocean is
constantly moving from high tide to low tide, and then back to high tide. There are
about 12.5 hours between the two high tides.
Spring tides occur twice in each lunar month when the sun, moon and earth are
aligned. This alignment allows the gravitational effect of the sun and moon to combine
and cause the highest tides followed by the lowest tides in the lunar month, producing
the largest tidal range.
Neap tides occur when the moon is furthest from being aligned with the earth and
sun at a point where it exerts the weakest possible effect on the tides. Consequently,
neap tides have the smallest tidal range.
During spring tides the tidal flow is at its fastest; conversely, during neap tides the tidal
flow is at its slowest.
Tides are a worldwide phenomena but are normally only discernible where the depth
of water decreases close to land masses.
As with currents, the effect of tidal streams should not be underestimated. Not only
can tides significantly speed up, or slow down, a ship’s progress through the water,
they can also carry a ship significantly off course unless measures are taken to allow
for tidal drift.
Navigational charts show the depth of water below chart datum. To find out how
deep the water is at any given time, the height of the tide for that particular time must
be calculated and added to the depth shown on the chart to arrive at the overall
depth of water.
Where the depth of the ship below the waterline, normally referred to as draught,
exceeds the overall depth calculated above, then it must either wait until the tide has
risen to a point where there is a sufficient depth of water, or take a different route
through deeper water in order to arrive at its intended destination.
Berthing in tidal ports may be dependent on the height of the tide to ‘lift’ the ship over
shallow areas in the approaches or even at the berth itself where it might intentionally
dry out at low water.
Other ports ensure a constant depth within the port by building a lock, or locks,
through which ships must pass from the approaches, where they are subject to the
changes of depth resulting from the rise and fall of the tide, into the port where there
is no rise or fall of water level.
Tidal ranges vary from one place to another; for example, in the Bay of Fundy in
Canada, the tide rises and falls over 16 metres, whereas in the Mediterranean there is
little or no tidal range.
• tidal information as shown on the appropriate chart for the area in question.
Overfalls
Also known as ‘tidal rips’. These normally occur close to land when:
Overfalls would not normally be dangerous for a larger ship unless it loses power,
when the sudden movements caused by the confused sea may well cause injuries to
crew, cause cargo lashings to fail and provide the extra risk of grounding due to their
proximity to the coastline. For this reason, large vessels will avoid overfalls in just
the same way as smaller ones. One of the largest overfalls in the UK exists south of
Portland on the south coast.
Whirlpools
Whirlpools are the result of strong opposite currents (hot vs cold) colliding, or changes
in landforms along the coast or under the surface. They can also occur when the
incoming tide meets the ebb of the last tide. These are comparatively rare and will
be avoided by ships navigating through an area where they are known to exist. Like
overfalls, whirlpools tend to occur during a particular part of the tidal flow and hence
are not permanent features.
Waves
Waves are defined as an undulation of the sea surface caused by the local wind
conditions. Waves are particularly dangerous to ships when they are breaking. This
can happen purely as a result of wind speed or in combination with other factors such
as wind against tide or where the depth of water in the area is changing quickly. The
most obvious example of the latter is the breaking seas seen from a gently shelving
beach in strong wind conditions.
Swell
These are waves produced by a storm in some far-off area of the ocean that have since
travelled across the seas to arrive in the locality of the observer. Compared to waves
produced by local winds, swell generally has a much longer distance between crests,
(that is, wavelength) and rarely breaks. In their own right, such seas do not normally
present a risk to shipping; however, they can combine with waves to produce a dangerous
condition.
Storm surges
A storm is caused by an intense area of low pressure. As a result of this low pressure
the seawater level increases in the immediate area of the storm. This ‘bump’ in the sea
level can be carried along by the long waves generated by the storm, which often travel
faster than the storm itself. In deep water these long waves quickly dissipate. However,
when such waves are produced close to shallow waters their energy has no time to
dissipate and their speed reduces as the water depths decrease, causing the wave height
to increase. The combination of big waves and a ‘bump’ in the sea level can be a risk to
low-lying communities, including users of tidal ports. To avoid such events, the best place
to be is at sea and away from the coastline. Some tidal ports will order ships to leave and
proceed to sea when a storm surge is expected.
Freak waves
Freak waves or ‘rogue’ waves are relatively large and spontaneous ocean surface waves
are a threat to all ships, regardless of type or size. They are more precisely defined as
waves whose height is more than twice the significant wave height (SWH), which is itself
defined as the mean of the largest third of waves in a wave record. However, it is not
fully understood what causes these waves. Rogue waves are therefore not necessarily
the biggest waves found at sea; rather, they are exceptionally large waves for a given
sea state. They were thought to occur only in deep water or where a number of physical
factors, such as where strong winds and fast currents meet. However, recent satellite
imagery has shown such waves in comparatively shallow waters like the Baltic.
Reports often refer to such waves looking like a ‘wall of water’, meaning they are very
steep-sided as well as being very high in comparison to other waves encountered
before and after the rogue wave, and possibly preceded by a very deep trough.
The areas of highest predictable risk appear to be where a strong current runs counter to
the primary direction of travel of the waves. The area near Cape Agulhas off the southern
tip of South Africa is one such area; the warm Agulhas Current runs to the south-west,
while the dominant winds are westerlies.
While seafarers can avoid these areas, we now know such waves can occur in areas
which do not have the characteristics referred to above. Fortunately, such waves are rare
events, hence the seafarer can only remain alert to their existence and have strategies in
place to deal with one should such a wave be encountered.
• MS München (mid-Atlantic, December 1978) – lost at sea leaving only ‘a few bits of
wreckage’ and signs of sudden damage including extreme forces 20m above the
waterline;
Tsunami
A tsunami is a series of waves with a very large wavelength. Tsunami are caused by
sudden mass movement in the earth’s crust under the ocean as a result of earthquakes
and landslides. The resulting wave(s) is not always obvious in the open sea, but can travel
at up to 500mph (or 800 km/hr) in the open ocean. As the waves get nearer to land and
encounter shallower depth, their speed reduces, causing the wave to rise to potentially
disastrous heights capable of overwhelming sea defences and causing significant damage
inland. Ships at sea may not notice the tsunami wave but, should a wave hit the shore, and
a port area in particular, serious damage is likely. Should a tsunami warning be in place,
ships should, if time permits, head out of port into deeper water.
Diagram of a tsunami
Wind
Low pressure systems, also referred to as cyclones, are associated with strong winds
and stormy weather.
High pressure systems, also referred to as anti-cyclones, are normally associated with
low winds, clear skies and droughts, and can feature extreme temperatures. In the
right conditions, such systems can still produce strong winds, so their reputation for
low wind speeds can be misleading.
Katabatic winds
These offshore winds are caused by cold air descending from high ground down
towards the coast and ultimately offshore. This type of wind is most prevalent in
temperate or high latitudes where the coast is backed by snow-capped mountains. If
this natural flow of air down from the tops of mountains is held back by, for example,
warm air rising up the side of the mountain, the mass of cold accumulates near the
top of the mountains. When this mass of cold air overwhelms the rising warm air, it
rushes down the mountainside, gathering more air/mass and energy as it descends,
before rushing out to sea. This might only create a strong wind but, with the right
conditions, it can produce very high, and consequently damaging, wind speeds. There
is little or no warning of these winds. It can go from flat calm to storm force 10 in less
than a minute. Such winds are very dangerous for small craft and any ship at anchor.
Ships alongside a berth are equally at risk.
Windstorms
There are a number of descriptive words used throughout the world for such storms,
for example, hurricane, cyclone and typhoon. They are all intense low pressure
systems involving wind speeds up to 140mph (or 220km/hr) and gusting up to
160mph (260 km/hr). Such storms occur in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans.
Generally, these storms start within five degrees of the equator and take a westerly
track while turning slowly towards the North or South Pole and, in some cases, even
turn back on themselves. These storms are inherently dangerous and the science
behind predicting the path they will follow has still a way to go before it is 100%
accurate. The wind speeds involved produce huge waves, often breaking, capable of
dumping hundreds of tons of water on board a ship unlucky enough to find itself in
the midst of such a storm.
The combination of wind and waves is one of the most treacherous a Master of a ship
has to face, because it can not only threaten the watertight integrity of the ship but
also its stability, particularly if it is carrying a cargo which is likely to shift in the extreme
conditions. Weather conditions of this severity are described as ‘perils of the sea’ and
can afford a defence to cargo claims that are caused by them.
As early as 1704, Daniel Defoe (the celebrated English writer) described a storm that
visited the British Isles the previous November, using a 12-point scale that he called a
table of degrees. He refers to the scale being the ‘bald terms used by our sailors’.
Francis Beaufort devised the scale that now bears his name while serving on board
HMS Woolwich in 1805. By 1829 he had risen to being the hydrographer of the British
Royal Navy and in 1831, it was he who commissioned the famous voyage of the Beagle
on which Charles Darwin sailed. It was only in 1838 that the Royal Navy first instructed
its ships to maintain hourly information on wind speed and direction within their logs.
The main Beaufort scale in its modern version has 13 categories (from 0 to 12), each
with a description, wind speed, wave heights and sea conditions. It is a tool of great
use and importance to anyone using the open sea. For more information on the
scale, see the Met Office website at www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/marine/guide/
beaufortscale.html.
Fog
For fog to form, the air must contain moisture and there must be particles, that is,
dust, in the air around which the moisture can coalesce to form droplets.
Fog, like mist, consists of visible water droplets or ice crystals suspended in the air.
Where these conditions reduce visibility to less than 1km it is defined as Fog. Where
the same conditions result in a lesser impairment to visibility it is defined as Mist.
The most obvious problem is that fog restricts visibility. While modern technology
provides ‘electronic eyes’ in the form of radar, the use of the human eye is still a vital
tool in modern seafaring. Each ship/vessel needs to be aware of the position of other
ships/vessels using the same waters and to ensure that the ship travels only at a
speed which is safe for the given conditions.
• Advection Fog
• Radiation Fog
• Valley Fog
• Freezing Fog.
Advection fog is the most common type encountered at sea. This is caused when
warm moist air passes horizontally over a cool surface. The warm moist air is cooled
to a point where the moisture within the air starts to form minute water droplets,
resulting in fog. Such fog is common around coastlines during the passage of a warm
front when warm moist air contacts cooler waters such as is found around the coast
of California in the spring and autumn.
Radiation fog is more of a problem ashore and close to the shoreline as it is generally
caused by the land cooling after sunset. The formation of radiation fog needs clear
skies and calm conditions, that is, no wind. The land radiates off the heat it has gained
during the day causing the air in contact with the land to be cooled to a point where
the moisture within the air starts to form minute water droplets which results in fog.
Commonly, the fog is less than a metre deep, although light winds can cause it to
increase in depth. Radiation fog normally dissipates soon after sunrise.
Valley fog is rarely a problem for shipping. As the name suggests, it happens inland
as warm moist air is forced up the sides of the valley, the air cools and can no longer
support the same amount of moisture, and fog is formed.
Freezing fog is very similar in its formation to advection fog but is only found in regions
with cold moist climates such as Scandinavia.
Ice
Ice comes in a number of forms, the principal ones being solid or ’pack’ ice, or floating
masses in the form of icebergs. The Arctic and the Antarctic are the obvious locations
where ice is expected but other areas of the world regularly traversed by ships are
also subject to ice at certain times of the year.
Some areas, like the St Lawrence Seaway, can be completely closed to traffic while
others will be kept open by icebreakers. While some ships are specifically built or
converted to navigate through ice, navigating even through surface ice exposes a
normal vessel to damage to its hull or its propeller. Cargo ships built to trade through
ice have specially strengthened hulls – see ’Ice Classification’ below.
Icebergs
Icebergs are large masses of ice, generally 90% below the surface, moving away from
the polar icecaps, having ‘calved’ – broken away from a glacier in warmer weather. One
of the positive outcomes of the Titanic tragedy (in 1912) was the development of what
is now called the International Ice Patrol which acts as a reconnaissance and warning
system for icebergs in the North Atlantic. This was established under the International
Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) as a consequence of this loss.
One tool that hull underwriters can use to ensure some control of the risk of vessel
damage by ice is the concept of Ice Classification. At its most basic, this requires that
vessels shall have thicker hull plating and additional strengthening in place. There are
two main categories, that for Baltic Ice and that for Arctic/polar ice. While the different
classification societies might call the various levels of classification by different names,
their requirements are similar.
The IMO has a set of guidelines for ships operating in waters covered by Arctic ice and
the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) has standard guidelines
which all member societies, such as Lloyd’s Register and Bureau Veritas, follow.
The ice classification goes from PC1 (Polar Class 1) – a vessel classed to operate year
round in all polar waters – to PC7, a vessel classed to operate only in summer and
autumn in thin first-year ice.
The IMO has also adopted the International Code for Ships Operating in Polar
Waters (Polar Code) and related amendments, which is mandatory under both the
International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and the International
Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL).
The Polar Code entered into force on 1 January 2017 and covers the full range of
shipping-related matters relevant to navigation in waters surrounding the two poles –
ship design, construction and equipment; operational and training concerns; search
and rescue; and, equally important, the protection of the unique environment and
eco-systems of the polar regions.
The code requires ships intending to operate in the defined waters of the Antarctic
and Arctic to apply for a Polar Ship Certificate, which would classify the ship as:
Ships will need to carry a Polar Water Operational Manual, to provide the owner,
operator, Master and crew with sufficient information regarding the ship’s operational
capabilities and limitations in order to support their decision-making process.
The chapters in the code each set out goals and functional requirements, to include
those covering ship structure; stability and subdivision; watertight and weathertight
integrity; machinery installations; operational safety; fire safety/protection; life-saving
appliances and arrangements; safety of navigation; communications; voyage planning;
manning and training; prevention of oil pollution; prevention of pollution from noxious
liquid substances from ships; prevention of pollution by sewage from ships; and
prevention of pollution by discharge of garbage from ships.
A further hazard is that arising from sandbanks and sandbars that are typically found
in ports situated in river estuaries. The outward flow of water from the river and the
inward flow of water from the sea can cause sandbanks/bars to form and to shift.
Indeed, in some ports, the changes are so frequent that it is not always possible to
chart them. In approaching and departing from such ports, the Master is even more
reliant upon the local pilots, who should be aware of the latest changes in the channel
depths.
Insurers do not control the operation of a ship; however, they use navigating or
trading warranties to make clear in insurance policies the restrictions that they wish to
put on the ship’s areas of operation. The current International Navigating Conditions
in use in the London insurance market give some quite specific co-ordinates in
relation to some of the restricted areas.
1) Gulf of Bothnia north of a line between Umea (63° 50’ N. Lat.) and Vasa (63° 06’ N. Lat.)
between 10th December and 25th May.
2) Where the ship is equal to or less than 90,000 DWT, Gulf of Finland east of 28° 45’ E.
Long. between 15th December and 15th May.
3) Ships greater than 90,000 DWT may not enter, navigate or remain in the Gulf of Finland
east of 28° 45’ E. Long. at any time.
4) Gulf of Bothnia, Gulf of Finland and adjacent waters north of 59° 24’ N. Lat. between 8th
January and 5th May, except for calls at Stockholm, Tallinn or Helsinki.
5) Gulf of Riga and adjacent waters east of 22° E. Long. and south of 59° N. Lat. between
28th December and 5th May.
In the St Lawrence area, there are special ice pilots to assist in navigating ships during
the early part of the open season when there is still plenty of ice around.
The P&I renewal date of 20th February represents the traditional date at which the
Baltic would be open to vessel traffic again.
Loadlines
While ships trade mainly in sea water they also encounter fresh water in rivers and
brackish water (a mixture of sea water and fresh water) in estuaries. Sea water is
denser than fresh water due to the quantity of salt it contains. Cold water is denser
than warm water. Vessels float higher in denser water than in less dense water with
the same load on board. This means that they have more reserve buoyancy in denser
water for a given load than they do in less dense water.
Below is a diagram of a typical Plimsoll line for a ship classed with Lloyd’s Register,
indicated by the ‘L’ and ‘R’ at each end of the long horizontal line on the left.
As well as loadlines now having the force of law insurers are also keen to ensure that
ships do not load so much cargo that they submerge their marks.
The Convention as revised in 2003 requires that ships must carry either an
International Load Line Certificate or an International Load Line Exemption Certificate
and now also includes requirements concerning hatchcovers, cargo openings,
machinery space openings, doorways and ventilators.
CHAPTER 3
VESSEL TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS
Chapter 3
Commercial vessels exist in many different forms, each with its own characteristics
which are specific to the types of cargo that they carry or the tasks that they
undertake.
This chapter explores the key types of vessel and their uses.
GT is a measure of the volume of a ship’s total internal spaces and shall not be
confused with measurements of mass or weight; although it is based on volumetric
calculations, it is a unitless index. In a similar manner, NT represents the volume of
the spaces available for cargo. The calculations necessary to arrive at the final GT and
NT figures shown on a vessel’s Tonnage Certificate are set out in the International
Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 (Tonnage Convention).
This is the weight a vessel can carry expressed in metric tonnes or long tons including
fuel, stores and equipment as well as cargo.
This is the physical weight of the vessel. It is used when the vessel is sold for
scrapping. It measures the ship without fuel, cargo or water but with the engine and
equipment. As with DWT, LDT can be expressed either in metric tonnes or long tons.
Given the complexity surrounding the measurement of ships and the fact that many
charges, such as harbour and canal dues, are based on these measurements, it is
important that a uniform approach is adopted around the world. This is achieved
through application of the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of
Ships, 1969, (the ’London Rules’) which applies to all ships built after July 1982 or, in
the case of vessels built before that date, from July 1994.
Bulk carriers
These are the backbone of seaborne trade. They perform the key function of moving
large amounts of raw materials in bulk from source to processing factories to support
power generation and manufacturing industry. ’Bulkers’ come in many different sizes.
The names given to the various types often indicate the restrictions applying to that
type of vessel in terms of the waterways through which it can pass.
The main categories of bulk carriers and their approximate deadweight are as follows:
• Panamax – 60,000 to 80,000 DWT – the maximum to transit the Panama Canal;
• Capesize – 80,000 DWT plus – too large for the Panama or Suez Canal, these vessels
travel via the Cape of Good Hope or Cape Horn.
Below is a diagram of a typical Panamax bulk carrier with engine and accommodation
at the stern of the vessel. The rest of the hull is used to the maximum capacity with
regular shaped holds which can take cargo either in a true bulk form, such as coal,
grain and ores, or in pre-packaged form, such as bags.
Freefall Bridge
lifeboat Hatches
Hatch- Accommodation
cover
Aft peak
Ballast
spaces Rudder Propeller Double-bottom tanks Forepeak
• can carry either homogeneous bulk cargo that is not packed and all of the same kind
– such as grain or iron ore - or cargo that is pre-packed in some way.
Container vessels
The largest container vessels – ultra-large container vessels or ULCVs – can carry
more than 23,000 TEUs with a length of over 1200 feet and draught of over 50 feet.
They are used for intercontinental carriage but the number of ports deep enough to
accommodate them is limited because of their size. Smaller ‘feeder’ container ships
which can call at smaller ports carry containers to and from the deep ‘hub’ ports
served by the large ships.
Containers loaded
on deck
12-13 containers
wide
Bridge Containers loaded on deck Mast
Lifeboat Breakwater
Accommodation
Aft
peak Engine
room
Rudder
Propeller
Double-bottom
tanks
Underdeck stowage Containers loaded on deck Underdeck Forepeak
Aft
peak
Engine
room
Rudder Underdeck
Stern thruster Loaded Bunker Bow thruster
Double-bottom Propeller decks tanks
tanks
side
Stowage in holds tanks
• carry only containers but the variety of cargoes loaded inside the containers is
extremely wide;
• large carrying capacity and potentially high-value cargo on board, the cumulative
value of which will usually far exceed the value of the ship and of any bulk cargo.
Thus, assuming an average value of cargo in each container of $25,000 – a
conservative figure, a 19,000 TEU vessel would be carrying nearly half a billion
dollars worth of cargo.
Tankers
Tankers are used for the carriage of all types of liquids in bulk including crude oil,
oil products and chemicals. They can also be used for the carriage of vegetable oils,
molasses, wine and other food products. These vessels are constructed in a variety of
sizes depending on the trade in which they are deployed. The largest crude oil tankers
have reached a size of over 450m long, although this was an extreme example (the
Knock Nevis, originally called the Seawise Giant). The largest tankers are highly restricted
in terms of where they can operate. This has led to the development of offshore
loading and unloading facilities which enable large tankers to avoid the need to enter
ports for mooring at a conventional berth.
The diagram including the Knock Nevis below gives an idea of its impressive size.
Tankers fall into two main categories; those which predominantly carry crude oil or
other types of ’dirty’ or ’persistent’ oil, and those which carry refined products – which
are usually ’clean’ or ’non-persistent’ – and commodities such as chemicals and edible
oils. These product tankers, unlike crude tankers, are often equipped with a large
number of segregated tanks and with associated pipework which enable different
The main categories of crude tankers and their approximate deadweight tonnage are as
follows:
• Ultra-Large Crude Carrier (ULCC) – 320,000+DWT, used for the carriage of crude oil on
long-haul routes from oil producing countries to Europe, North America or the Far East;
• Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) – 200,000 to 320,000 DWT, used on similar routes to
the ULCC but with more flexibility in terms of port access, being slightly smaller;
• Malaccamax – a vessel which is the maximum size and draught to transit the Strait of
Malacca which has a depth of only 25m;
• Suezmax – 120,000 to 150,000 DWT, the maximum size able to transit the Suez Canal
while laden;
• Aframax – 80,000 to 120,000 DWT, a tanker so-called because it represents the largest
size of tanker featured in the Average Freight Rate Assessment scale published regularly
by the London Tanker Brokers’ Panel. An Aframax is too broad in its beam to be able to
transit the Panama Canal;
• Panamax – up to about 80,000 DWT, the maximum able to transit the Panama Canal.
A typical VLCC
Aft Fore
peak Engine peak
No. 5 No. 4 No. 3 No. 2 No. 1
Starboard Port room
cargo cargo cargo cargo cargo
tanks tanks
tank tank tank tank tank
Port tanks
Engine Fore
room Starboard tanks peak
Aft Fore
peak Engine peak
No. 5 No. 4 No. 3 No. 2 No. 1
Starboard Port room
cargo cargo cargo cargo cargo
tanks tanks
tank tank tank tank tank
Port tanks
Engine Fore
room Starboard tanks peak
A typical Suezmax
Bridge
Freefall Cargo Hose cranes
lifeboat Accommodation manifold port & starboard
Slop tanks &
pump room
Aft Fore
peak peak
Starboard Port Engine No. 6 No. 5 No. 4 No. 3 No. 2 No. 1
tanks tanks room cargo cargo cargo cargo cargo cargo
tank tank tank tank tank tank
Port tanks
Engine Fore
room peak
Starboard tanks
Bridge
Aft Fore
peak peak
Starboard Port Engine No. 6 No. 5 No. 4 No. 3 No. 2 No. 1
tanks tanks room cargo cargo cargo cargo cargo cargo
tank tank tank tank tank tank
Port tanks
Engine Fore
room peak
Starboard tanks
The main categories of product tankers and their approximate deadweight tonnage
are as follows:
• often equipped with additional facilities for handling the cargo – for example,
heating coils in the tanks to ensure that cargoes of crude oil remain pumpable.
Gas carriers
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) (methane, ethane and ethylene) and liquefied petroleum
gas (LPG) (propane, propylene, and butane) are both a by-product of crude oil
exploration. They also exist independently of crude oil processing. Specialist methods
of sea-carriage have been developed to move these commodities in bulk around
the world. The key issue is the state in which the gas is carried. It is very inefficient to
carry as the volume of a gas is up 600 times greater than its volume when chilled and
compressed into a liquid. LNG and LPG have differing chemical properties so different
degrees of chilling and compression are required. Butane becomes a gas at -0.5°C,
propane at –43°C but ethane gasifies at –164°C, so LNG cargoes require more chilling
to maintain the liquid state.
It is essential to ensure that the vessel can maintain the necessary chilling and
compression during the voyage. This is achieved by equipping specialised vessels
with tanks that are heavily insulated and are, in addition, constructed in a shape that
maximises their ability to hold liquid under pressure. The largest gas carriers are
around 100,000DWT.
The images on the following page illustrate an LNG carrier showing the spherical tanks
that are used in LNG carriers. This is one type of tank in use, the other most common
type being the membrane tank.
Cargo
Engine No. 5 No. 4 No. 3 No. 2 No. 1
tank
room tank tank tank tank tank
• highly expensive to build and therefore often built only against long-term contracts
from producers/suppliers;
Refrigerated vessels
These vessels are built to ensure that temperature-sensitive cargoes carried in them
reach their destination in the optimum condition. They are generally, although not
exclusively, used for the carriage of food products. They can provide various levels of
chilling either to ensure no change in the status of the cargo or, in the case of some
fruits and vegetables, to ensure that a controlled ripening process takes place during
the voyage. In a refrigerated vessel the complete holds themselves are insulated and
temperature controlled. Although referred to as ‘refrigerated’ (or ‘reefer’ vessels),
these vessels are also capable, if required, of maintaining the carriage of cargo in a
frozen state. Refrigerated cargo may also be carried in special refrigerated containers
on suitably equipped container ships. This has led to a reduction in the number of
specialised reefer vessels in service.
Car carriers
These vessels are specially built to move large quantities of vehicles in the most
efficient way possible from manufacturing location to country of sale. They have many
decks which are interconnected by ramps. Larger car carriers can carry over 8,000
cars and are around 50,000DWT. Loading and unloading can be done in the shortest
time possible by driving the vehicles on to and off the ship – known as roll-on/roll-off
or ro-ro.
• many car decks of relatively low height without transverse bulkheads, thereby
allowing vehicles to be driven into position;
• car decks accessed through roll-on/roll-off ramp rather than by means of cranes.
These vessels, commonly referred to as ’ro-ro vessels’, are designed to carry mixed
cargo that can be rolled on to and off the vessel, such as vehicles, trailers and
specialised machinery and equipment for major infrastructure such as power stations
often known as ’project cargo’. Ro-ros are employed on both coastal and international
trades. They include the car ferries that trade in many parts of the world, carrying
both private passengers and their vehicles, and loaded commercial vehicles and their
drivers.
Ro-ro vessels vary greatly in size and can vary also in design. The traditional ro-ro
vessel is made of steel, like other vessels, and is powered by engines and propellers.
A later development is that of the smaller high-speed ferry, made of aluminium – to
reduce weight – and powered by gas turbines and water jets. Many ferry companies
have both types of vessel.
Bridge
Internal ramps
Engine
room
Double-bottom tanks
Rudder Propeller Main engine Forepeak
tanks
Ro-ro lanes
• Although they are used internationally, they tend to be used on shorter routes with
more port calls than other vessels
• can be built of lightweight metals and powered by methods other than traditional
engines;
• lighter ro-ros can travel at high speeds increasing the number of voyages that can
be completed in a given time.
A traditional ferry
A high-speed ferry
These are usually purpose-built to serve certain markets. These include the specialist
cruise around Antarctica or the mass market cruise around the Mediterranean or the
Caribbean. In many respects, passenger vessels resemble floating hotels. The largest
cruise ships are more than 1000 feet long and can carry more than 7000 passengers
and crew combined. They are the most expensive ships to build, with costs for the
largest ships now approaching $1 billion.
• the crew is usually divided into two categories – a navigating crew and (much larger)
hotel crew.
Specialist vessels
• salvage tugs, or other tugs being used for salvage work (for example, port tugs).
One of the key aspects of these vessels is the significant power of the vessel in
comparison to its size, which it needs to perform the role for which it is designed;
A salvage tugboat
A dredger
CHAPTER 4
WHO’S WHO IN THE SHIPPING BUSINESS
Who’s who in the shipping business
Chapter 1 showed how the global economy is dependent on transport by sea. The
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) estimates that, in
2019, a total of 11 billion tons of cargo was carried on ships. This compares with about
6 billion tons in 2000. World trade continues to expand.
The efficient handling of the different commodities and products that make up
this vast quantity of cargo, and the different types of ships required to move them,
involves a chain of interrelated specialist service providers which together make up
the shipping industry as a whole. The role of each of the links in this chain is described
briefly below.
Some ships – for example, large container ships – run to a regular published timetable
similar to a scheduled airline or railway. Potential customers wishing to ship cargo can
easily find out when a ship is sailing to the port of discharge required. Other ships
operate on an opportunistic basis, picking up suitable cargo as and when it becomes
available, without predetermined routes or timetables. These are known as ’tramp’
ships. They will often have to sail from a port of discharge to their next port of loading
with no cargo on board. This is known as a ’ballast voyage’ when the vessel is ’in
ballast’ – without cargo.
Identifying the nationality of ownership of a ship is not always easy. A ship’s nationality
is that of its ’flag state’ – the state in which the company which owns the ship and the
ship itself is legally registered and whose flag it flies. However, this may not be the
nationality of the company which has the commercial responsibility for operating the
ship. Equally, it may not be the nationality of those who have the controlling financial
interest (sometimes called the ’beneficial ownership’) in the company that is the
registered owner of the ship. Ships that fly the flag of a state that is not the country of
the beneficial ownership are known as ’foreign flag’ or ’flag of convenience (FOC) ships.
Such complex ownership structures may be put in place to enable beneficial owners
to take advantage of favourable regulatory and employment regimes in particular flag
states, to reduce the ability of claimants against the ship to attack the assets of the
beneficial owners, for financial or tax planning purposes, or for a combination of these
reasons (for more on flag states see Chapter 5).
1 Panama 329
2 Liberia 275
5 Singapore 140
6 Malta 116
7 China 100
8 Bahamas 78
9 Greece 69
10 Japan 40
- World 2,062
• Greece
• Japan
• China
• Singapore
• Hong Kong
• Germany
• Republic of Korea
• Norway
• Bermuda
• United States
Countries like Panama and Liberia which have a registered tonnage disproportionate
to the size of the local economy are known as ’flag of convenience’ countries.
Shipowners are primarily responsible for all aspects of management of their ships
unless they choose to outsource some or all of them (for example, see Ship Managers
below). These management functions include crewing, supplying, provisioning,
maintaining and insuring the ships. Owners are also responsible for the quality of all
aspects of the vessel’s operation and compliance with the demanding international
regulatory requirements to which ships are subject. To balance all this they must
ensure that cargoes are obtained to generate enough income to ensure that the
ship can be traded at a profit. Given that the demands of the global economy are
continually fluctuating this is no easy task.
Action Step: Read through chapter 2 of the latest UNCTAD Review of Maritime
Transport which provides an overview of global tonnage ownership and tonnage
statistics.
Most businesses, even if they have the funds available, choose not to purchase
their assets outright. They prefer to fund the purchase in part through loans or by
raising equity, and the shipping industry is no different. There are specialist shipping
banks established in the major shipping centres around the world which understand
shipowners and their operations, and are prepared to provide loans for the purchase
of new or secondhand ships. However, the prospective shipowner will normally be
expected to contribute a proportion of the purchase price.
The bank lending the money will want protection for its investment and the ship
will become security for the loan. Most loan agreements require the shipowner to
purchase insurance covering hull and machinery, war and P&I risks. In most cases,
the benefits under these policies are made over or ’assigned’ to the banks as part
of the security for the loan and formal ’notices of assignment’ are endorsed on to
the policies. This has the practical effect of making the bank the entity to which any
insurance proceeds will be paid. However, in terms of day-to-day operations, many
policies with notices of assignment also have loss payee clauses. This specifies exactly
how any claims payments should be made by insurers. The banks generally permit
funds to be paid to the shipowner directly but if the shipowner gets into financial
difficulties, the bank may require payment to them directly or payment in accordance
with their instructions.
Ship managers
• sales/chartering: the team that generates the cargo to be carried and handles the
chartering of the vessels;
• operations: the team that runs the ships, arranges any repairs, organises
stevedoring where necessary, organises supplies for the ship including bunkers (fuel
for generators and engines) and arranges port calls;
• crewing: the team which hires officers and crew for the ships under management
and maintains contacts with crewing agents on countries which specialise in
providing crew – for example, the Philippines;
Some ship managers also provide owners with advice on insurance, ship sale and
purchase, and the supervision of new buildings. An organisation chart from a ship
management company is shown below, as an illustration of the many functions for
which a typical ship manager is responsible.
A standardised ship management contract known as the SHIPMAN 98 sets out clearly
the rights and obligations of both owners and managers, and covers tasks such as
crewing, insurance, freight management, provisioning, bunkering and operations. If
the managers are also supplying crew there are other specialised contracts for these
purposes called CREWMAN A and B.
There is a professional body for ship managers known as InterManager which was
founded in 1991. The main purpose of this organisation is to raise the profile of ship
management and to ensure high standards through quality assurance accreditation.
Charterers
While some cargo producers and traders own ships to carry their own cargo – for
example, the major mining and oil companies - the majority do not. Instead, they may
choose to charter ships for a stated period or voyage rather than make the investment,
both financial and managerial, involved in owning a ship. Equally, a ship- owner may
decide to charter a ship from another shipowner if they have insufficient tonnage of
their own to carry cargo that they need to move. To charter a ship the charterer enters
into a contract with the shipowner or operator known traditionally as a charter party but
now more often as a charter contract or simply a charter.
The parties have a choice between a demise or bareboat charter, a time charter and a
voyage charter.
It is quite possible for the same ship to be under bareboat, time and voyage charter at
the same time, as the diagram above shows. In such a case, the owner has a contractual
relationship only with the first of the charterers in the chain.
A contractual chain of this complexity can give rise to problems when a dispute
arises between two of the parties. It may then be passed up and/or down the chain
as parties seek to pass on the responsibility for the alleged cause of the dispute.
Normally, the intermediate charter contracts are on similar terms but that is not
always the case. Over the years, a number of standard forms of charter have been
developed to serve the needs of various trades.
Action Step: Look at the BIMCO website for further information on standard
forms of charter contract
Ship’s Crew
In the context of this section, ‘crew’ can be defined as the whole complement of the
ship’s company. On passenger ships and ferries this includes a significant quantity of
hospitality-related crew in addition to deck, navigation and engineering crew.
The importance of a good crew cannot be underestimated. The successful and safe
operation and maintenance of each ship is very largely in the hands of its crew.
Management of a large proportion of problems that vessels can encounter depends
on the quality of the crew on board the ship.
The number and qualifications of the crew are not a decision solely in the hands of
the shipowner or the Master. A vessel’s flag state controls the numbers of the crew
and each flag state issues what is known as a safe manning document (SMD) to the
shipowner or manager. Generally, all vessels have deck officers, engine room officers
and other crew. The SMD sets out the minimum requirements of the flag for a vessel,
taking into account both the qualification requirements that the flag state authority
sets out for officers and the practical operational issues in relation to the individual
vessel in question. Crew numbers do not increase proportionately to the size of the
ship. Modern technology means that even a very large vessel may only have 20 or so
crew on board.
The SMD sets out the number, categories and required qualifications of officers and
crew members that need to be on board the vessel.
The following table indicates the minimum number of officers required under UK
regulations which conform to international norms.
It is an absolute requirement that the crew numbers on board must never go below
the minimum number specified. If, because of an emergency, the Master finds
themself one crew member short, they must contact the vessel’s flag state authorities
and request an ’exemption certificate’. If a certificate is granted it will only be for a
limited period and the remaining crew must still not work more than their permitted
hours, even with overtime.
When considering the number of crew required, the flag state authority requires
owners and operators to:
• assess the numbers and grades/capacities in the ship’s complement required for
these purposes;
• ensure that the manning level is adequate at all times and in all respects, including
meeting peak workloads, and is in accordance with the principles contained in
the relevant Marine Shipping Notice issued to the vessel in case of changes in
trading area(s), operations, construction, machinery, equipment or operation and
maintenance.
International regulations require that all ships have English as the common working
language on the bridge unless another language has been established, not only as the
common language on board but also between ship and shore. Ships can be detained
by port authorities if the crew members cannot understand orders in English and
there is no arrangement for giving orders in a language that they can understand.
In times of high shipping demand there may be a worldwide shortage of trained and
experienced crew.
Cargo interests
The shipper – called the consignor in the United States of America – is the party that
is the supplier or owner of cargo shipped. The shipper contracts with the carrier –
either the shipowner or charterer – for the carriage of the shipper’s cargo.
The consignee (or receiver) is the party to whom cargo is shipped and to whom
delivery of the cargo is to be made under the contract of carriage.
Shipbrokers
Sale and purchase brokers deal with new and secondhand vessels, both for further
trading or for demolition (scrapping). The large broking houses have departments
specialising in various different vessel types.
Chartering brokers specialise in matching cargoes with vessels to carry them. As with
sale and purchase brokers there is a tendency for brokers to specialise in certain
sectors. It is quite usual to find both sale and chartering broking functions in one
organisation.
Action step: Visit the websites for both Clarksons and Braemar to see the
services they offer: www.clarksons.com and www.braemaracm.com
The amount of hire or freight that the shipowner can earn is largely determined by
market forces, in particular, the balance between demand and supply for the type
of ship in question at the relevant time. The Baltic Exchange has been the centre for
trading in ships and cargoes in the City of London for more than 250 years. Located
in St Mary Axe in the City, the Baltic’s origins go back to 1744 and the re-naming of
a coffee shop where shipowners and cargo traders met in Threadneedle Street to
the ’Virginia and Baltick’. A face-to-face trading room (similar to that in the Lloyd’s of
London insurance market) was built in 1823 when a set of rules was developed and
a committee of senior coffee house regulars was established to regulate trading
between shipowners, shipbrokers and cargo interests.
The bombing of the Baltic Exchange building in 1992 and the development of modern
trading led to trading now being done electronically or on the telephone between the
parties rather than face-to-face. The Baltic remains a key part of the shipping industry.
It now publishes freight indices, including dry cargo, bulk cargo and tankers of various
types, which form the basis of settlement of forward freight contracts.
One of the key indices for the dry cargo trade is the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) which is
published daily, made up of information from 20 key dry bulk routes. For more details
on the BDI visit http://www.balticexchagne.com/en/data-services/routes.html
Tankers are often chartered on a basis known as Worldscale. It is quite normal in the
tanker markets for cargo to be sold at least once, after loading and before discharge.
This means that the destination of the vessel will not be known until long after it has
sailed from the load port. As a result, the tanker industry uses Worldscale, which
takes into account not only the different port costs but also different steaming times
to each of the ports. For a given Worldscale rate, the owners know they will earn
approximately the same equivalent time charter return, whichever port of discharge is
nominated in that range, at the applicable Worldscale rate per tonne of cargo.
Tanker scales were first introduced during the Second World War by the United
Kingdom and United States governments and after a number of changes, ‘New
Worldscale’ was introduced from 1 January 1989. The epithet ‘new’ was soon dropped
and it is generally understood that ‘Worldscale’ refers to the new scale.
Baltic indexes are used as benchmarks to enable the trading of forward freight
agreements (FFA). FFAs are contracts which enable parties to contract for the future
level of freight rates in a particular shipping market and so hedge their exposure to
volatility in freight levels. For more details on FFAs you may wish to review Simpson
Spence Young’s free FFA course: http://bit.ly/15kYwQH.
Operating Costs
Every shipowner or operator, when considering what the breakeven figure is for any
voyage or period of time, has to take into account that there are vessel operating
costs which they cannot avoid.
The chart opposite (courtesy of Moore Stephens LLP) indicates the relative
proportions of the costs that a shipowner has to incur. These costs fluctuate as do the
freight rates which cargo owners and charterers are prepared to pay. In periods when
operating costs exceed freight rates owners need deep pockets to be able to continue
to trade.
40
35
30
% of overall
25
20
15
10
0
ning res airs ran
ce ral ce Oil Oil ost ost
Man Sto Rep n s u G ene ntenan F uel Diesel Port C pital C
I ai Ca
cM
e r iodi
P
When a vessel is not earning enough even to cover its running costs the owner must
seriously consider the available options. If there is no profitable employment for the
ship, there is unlikely to be a healthy sale and purchase market. This then leaves three
main options; to continue to trade the ship at a loss, to sell the ship for scrap, or to lay
it up. Lay-up means putting a ship into the equivalent of mothballs, pending a return
to healthier trading conditions.
• Hot: a short-term solution involving some reduction in crewing and other costs but
maintaining the engine and other equipment in running order.
In deciding whether to go for hot or cold lay-up the owner considers such matters as:
• lay-up costs;
The owner must involve a number of other interested parties, including hull and P&I
underwriters, in the decision as to whether and where to lay the vessel up.
Action step: Investigate what guidance the Clubs issue to their members about
lay-up.
Hull and machinery underwriters insure shipowners against physical loss and damage
to their ships, including their engines and equipment, and against liabilities arising out
of collision. Hull and machinery policies are limited to the value of the vessel although
this can be increased somewhat by agreement to take account of market increase in
value in the case of a total loss (’increased value’ or ’IV’ cover). Hull insurance markets
are widespread throughout the world. Historically, London, and in particular the
Lloyd’s market, has been dominant but that is less the case now. For many years there
have also been important international hull insurance markets in France, Germany,
Italy, Japan, Scandinavia and the United States of America. The vast majority of hull
insurance is underwritten by profit- making commercial underwriters but some hull
cover is underwritten by mutual insurance hull clubs.
Cargo underwriters
Cargo insurers insure cargo against fortuitous loss or damage occurring during its
transit from place of departure to place of destination. As with hull insurance, cargo
insurance is widely available from insurance markets throughout the world. Not
all cargoes carried in international transit are insured. The choice as to whether to
insure or not is taken by the cargo owner or determined by the cargo sale contract.
Most claims in respect of loss of or damage to cargo brought against shipowners or
operators responsible for the cargo are in fact brought by cargo underwriters under
rights of ’subrogation’ whereby the insured cargo owner passes to the underwriters
any rights to recover against the responsible party in exchange for coverage under the
insurance policy.
Liabilities incurred by shipowners in the course of the operation of their ships are
covered under P&I policies.
Risks insured include liabilities for loss and damage to cargo, other vessels, shore
installations, personnel (both on board and ashore), pollution and wreck removal.
The majority (about 90%) of the world’s oceangoing tonnage are entered for P&I
coverage with one of the 13 P&I Clubs which are Members of the International Group
of P&I Clubs. The Group has three main roles:
• providing a forum for International Group Clubs to develop common policies and
promote shipowners’ and operators’ interests in relation to liability insurance issues
with governments, international regulatory bodies and industry organisations;
• sharing information and advice about current legal and technical issues of concern
to the International Group Clubs and their Members.
There is also a healthy P&I market outside of the International Group Clubs - in
particular in the small ship sector - with a number of facilities offering P&I coverage
to shipowners and charterers with varying limits on cover e.g. British Marine Mutual,
RaetsMarine, Charterers P&I Club, Korea P&I, China P&I and Ingosstrakh amongst
others.
The commercial insurance markets can provide insurance for legal expenses incurred
in defending or prosecuting a civil claim. In the shipping business, freight, demurrage
and defence (FD&D or Defence) insurance covers the legal and other costs incurred
by owners, operators or charterers in pursuing or defending contractual claims under
charter contracts or other commercial agreements for freight, demurrage (money
owed for delay in loading or unloading cargo) or other sums due.
Most marine defence cover is provided on a mutual basis by P&I Clubs either insured
by the P&I Club itself or by an affiliated but separate Defence Club.
available from commercial insurers specialising in the marine market and also from
mutual insurers such as the International Transport Intermediaries Club (ITIC).
Clients of professional indemnity insurers will include ship managers, brokers and
agents, crewing managers and agents, and adjusters, surveyors and other marine
technical experts, as well as P&I Club managers.
Insurance brokers
The insurance broker acts as an agent for its client in the negotiation and placing of
insurance for the client with the insurance market. In addition, the broker provides
expert advice to clients about the various products and markets available. Insurance
brokers act for all the different parties described above who require cover for the
liabilities they may incur in their particular role in the chain of relationships which
constitute the global shipping industry.
An insurance broker need not be located in the insurance market place in which
policies are placed. The larger broking houses have offices in major insurance markets
around the world to enable them to service international clients directly and to ensure
good local knowledge of available insurance providers.
Ships’ agents
A ship’s agent is engaged locally by the shipowner or manager to provide the ship with
all the services required during its call at a port. These include ensuring that pilots,
stevedores, berths and tugs are ready for the ship’s arrival. When the ship has arrived
the agent arranges for the supply of everything needed for the ship and crew from
bunkers to vegetables, as well as liaising with customs, port health officials and other
local authorities on the ship’s behalf.
It is common, especially in the bulk trades, for the charterer to have the right
to nominate the ship’s agent at the ports of loading and discharge. In these
circumstances the shipowner sometimes appoints a second agent to act specifically
as owner’s agent. Such an agent is sometimes called a ‘husbanding’ agent, since all the
ship’s needs in the way of stores, provisions and crew matters are channelled through
them.
Crew members can be sourced directly or the services of a crew manning agent can
be used. These services are available to both shipowners and operators looking for
crew and also to crew members looking for new employment.
From the shipowner’s perspective, a good manning agent performs all the initial
screening of applicants including pre-employment medical examinations and can
also check that applicants have the abilities - including language skills - that their
certificates say they have. Some P&I Clubs have established pre-employment medical
examination programmes to screen crew for pre-employment illness which could lead
to claims for medical costs and repatriation expenses if the seaman in question were
engaged.
Manning agents can be found worldwide, but many are established in the traditional
source countries for seafarers such as the Far East, South East Asia and Europe.
Once the crew members have been identified and passed any fitness test required,
they will then be engaged using approved forms of crew agreement, the detail of
which the Clubs need to see. No person can be signed on to a ship for more than 11
consecutive months, as there is a requirement for at least four weeks’ holiday in each
year.
Once the crew have been engaged, the shipowner has a duty to ensure their ongoing
training. The Master is responsible for ensuring that new crew members are trained
before the ship sails and before they are assigned to any ship-board duties.
Classification societies
The original committee, known as the Register Society, dates back to 1760. It later
became Lloyd’s Register. It printed the first Register of Ships in 1764 with the aim of
giving underwriters and merchants an idea of the condition of the ships they were
insuring or chartering. The hull was rated or ‘classified’ A, E, I, O or U, with A being the
best rating. The measure related to the quality of the vessel’s original construction and
its ongoing soundness (or otherwise). Equipment was rated G, M or B (good, middling
or bad). This was eventually replaced with 1, 2 or 3, leading to the development of A1
being the best quality there is– see the Lloyd’s Register website www.lr.org for more
information.
The classification process can be divided into several steps covering the entire life of
the vessel:
• a technical review of the design plans and related documents for a new vessel to
verify compliance with the rules of the society;
The following diagram (courtesy of DNV GL Group) shows the relationships during a
new building:
Supplies of
Co Component Orders
Shipowner
Shipyard
– Client –
o
Approval
o
Drawing
Subsuppliers
for
Test
C
Ce e
Survey of C o
Newbuilding o e
Industry
Co o
Ce e
of Class Testing of Components
National Statutory
Ce e
The important point to note from the diagram above is that the contractual
relationship during the building process is between the yard and Class rather than
between the shipowner and Class. The fees of the classification society form part of
the price of the ship. The owner receives their Class certificate from the yard on
payment of the final bill. From that point, the relationship between owner and Class
begins.
When the necessary surveys have been completed the shipowner’s request for the
issuance of a Class certificate will be considered by the supervising society and, if
the vessel is deemed satisfactory, the assignment of Class will be approved and a
certificate issued. The vessel is now ’in class’.
Once the vessel is in service the owner must submit the vessel to a clearly specified
programme of periodical class surveys to verify that the ship continues to meet
the relevant conditions for continuation of class. A vessel which is not continually
maintained ’in class’ under the rules of a reputable society will almost certainly find
that its insurances will be invalidated.
The owner must tell the classification society immediately if any defects are noted
or damage occurs which could impact on the classification status. If so, the class
surveyors will inspect the ship and issue a ‘condition of class’ requiring the defect to
be rectified within a certain time frame. If it is a major defect, Class may require it to
be repaired immediately. If a ship has a ‘condition of class’, it still remains ’in class’.
If the condition is not rectified as required the vessel will go ’out of class’ and its
insurances will be prejudiced.
The classification societies and a ship’s flag state work together very closely to
implement much of the international maritime safety regime and, more particularly,
to avoid needless duplication of effort in surveying ships. (For more on flag states see
chapter 5).
Classification societies are not immune from litigation in the aftermath of maritime
casualties. In recent times there have been a number of high profile maritime
casualties involving both loss of life and pollution that have led to legal action being
taken against the society of the ship concerned. Allegations may be made that the
society has failed to ensure that the ship concerned was maintained in seaworthy
condition and that the society is therefore responsible for the casualty.
Action Step: Research the Erika casualty and find out what claims were made,
and by whom, against the relevant classification society. Start by looking at
www.iopcfunds.org/incidents/#1999-235-December.
Average adjusters
The word ‘average’ is derived from the French word ‘avarie’, which means damage. In
the insurance context there is a distinction between ‘particular’ and ‘general’ average.
Particular average means loss or damage to one insured interest. General average
denotes loss or damage that is shared between all interests involved in the voyage
(sometimes referred to as the ’marine adventure’) concerned.
Average adjusters are expert in the law and practice of marine insurance and general
average. They prepare claims under marine insurance policies which generally
involve loss of or damage to ships, cargoes or freight. They may also be called upon
to prepare statements of claim against third parties and to deal with the division of
recoveries from third parties.
Lloyd’s agents
Lloyd’s agents are appointed by the Lloyd’s Agency Department on behalf of the
underwriters at Lloyd’s. The Lloyd’s agency network consists of almost 260 Lloyd’s
agents and a further 260 subagents around the world. Most agents still provide
Lloyd’s with details of shipping movements and casualty information but their main
role is one of conducting or arranging surveys on ships and cargoes for insurers
and commercial interests throughout the world. In addition, almost 200 agents have
been granted authority to adjust and settle claims arising under Lloyd’s certificates of
insurance.
These organisations are the Clubs’ eyes and ears around the world and are usually
the first involved in any problems that arise with the operation of a vessel insured by
a Club. Most correspondents are independent commercial companies based in ports
around the world that specialise in assisting P&I Clubs and their members with the
handling of problems, claims and disputes arising in the ports, terminals and coastal
seas nearby. Sometimes law firms are referred to by Clubs as ’legal correspondents’
and a Club has both a ’commercial correspondent’ and a ’legal correspondent’ in the
same port.
Correspondents often represent more than one Club as well as commercial insurance
companies and Lloyd’s underwriters. If a situation arises where more than one of
their principals requires their services in the same case, a potential conflict of interest
arises. This can be resolved on a ‘first come, first served’ principle or by one client
deciding to use a different representative for that particular case.
Maritime lawyers
The large number of different parties and financial interests involved in the shipping
industry, and the hazardous nature of sea transport, means that the international and
national laws and regulations which apply to it are complex. The potential for disputes
and accidents is correspondingly high and the services of specialist maritime lawyers
are in great demand. A large proportion of charter and cargo contracts worldwide
specify English law and jurisdiction so that London is one of the principal centres of
maritime litigation. Other busy centres for the resolution of legal matters include New
York, Singapore and Hong Kong but the international nature of the industry means
that almost all coastal nations have developed specialist maritime laws and courts
with a specialist group of maritime lawyers to assist and advise parties when required.
When a marine casualty occurs or a claim has arisen surveyors are used to establish
the facts – in particular, the extent of damage to the insured interest – and to
determine causation. Some surveyors are expert in ships’ hulls, others in ships’
engines, others in the different types of cargo. Their clients include shipowners
and charterers, marine underwriters, average adjusters, P&I Clubs, ship and engine
builders, classification societies, statutory authorities, the offshore industry, harbour
authorities and the legal profession.
In litigation and in arbitration, surveyors may act as expert witnesses. They also sit as
arbitrators, particularly in cases where there are technical issues to resolve. They may
act as technical advisers to marine enquiries and investigations, in a way similar to
that in which the Elder Brethren of Trinity House assist the Admiralty Judge in collision
cases.
There are many different types of expert in addition to surveyors. They include
naval architects, metallurgists, chemists, biochemists, economists and information
technology specialists. Depending on the circumstances of a case, their expertise may
be called upon to assist the parties and the court to understand what has happened
and why it happened, and to clarify where responsibility may lie.
ICS is the principal international trade association for the shipping industry,
representing all sectors and trades and comprising various national shipowner
associations. Through this structure it can speak for a significant majority of
international shipping. Its aim is to act as an advocate for the industry on issues
of maritime affairs, shipping policy, legal and technical matters, including ship
construction, operation, safety and management, and to develop best practice in the
industry.
Since 1948 the ITF has conducted a campaign against flag of convenience (FOC) ships.
It defines these as vessels ‘where beneficial ownership and control of a vessel … is
found to lie elsewhere than in the country of the flag the vessel is flying.’
The campaign has two elements; one political, designed to eradicate the flag of
convenience system overall and the other industrial, to ensure that seafarers who
serve on FOC ships are properly protected from exploitation. While the political
objective has not been achieved, the ITF has made considerable progress in achieving
its aims. One measure it has used with particular effect is industrial action directed
against individual ships or fleets by its affiliated shoreside unions worldwide ,
especially those representing dockers and tug services.
Over the last 50 years, the ITF has developed a set of policies which seek to establish
minimum acceptable standards applicable to seafarers on FOC ships. These policies
form the basis of the ITF Standard Collective Agreement, which sets the wages and
working conditions for all crew on FOC ships, regardless of nationality. All ships whose
crew are covered by a crewing agreement acceptable to the ITF are issued with a
Blue Certificate by the ITF Secretariat. About a quarter of all FOC vessels are presently
covered by ITF agreements. Compliance with ITF recognised agreements is monitored
by a network of ITF inspectors in ports throughout the world.
ITOPF was founded in the aftermath of the Torrey Canyon disaster, primarily to
administer the voluntary compensation scheme for damage by oil pollution that
was introduced soon after called TOVALOP (Tanker Owners Voluntary Agreement
concerning Liability for Oil Pollution). Alongside TOVALOP, in which shipowners’
interests participated, a parallel regime called CRISTAL (Contract Regarding an Interim
Supplement to Tanker Liability for Oil Pollution) was developed by the oil cargo
interests led by the major oil companies.
The objective of these two agreements was to provide on a voluntary basis the same
level of protection for the victims of a pollution incident as they would have had under
the oil pollution conventions that were being developed by IMO at that time. The
agreements acted as interim measures pending the widespread ratification of the Civil
Liability Convention (CLC) and Fund Conventions.
As a consequence of the significant number of oil spills that occurred in the 1970s,
ITOPF developed a technical function to provide advice on response efforts and an
objective assessment of the reasonableness of any clean-up efforts and claims for
compensation, under both the voluntary regimes and the conventions.
TOVALOP and CRISTAL were wound up in 1997 (the agreements were not renewed)
and the main focus of ITOPF today is the assessment of damage caused by spills and
the resulting claims for compensation; on contingency planning and advisory work;
on training and education, and on information services. Since 1980 ITOPF has had
consultative status with the IMO and the International Oil Pollution Compensation
Funds.
Although ITOPF was originally founded by tanker owners the rising incidence of
pollution from non-tankers has led to a widening of its membership. Since 1999
non-tanker owners and bareboat charterers have been eligible to become members.
Membership of ITOPF for both tanker owners and non-tanker owners is in practice
effected through their P&I Clubs, through which ITOPF is also funded.
With the entry into force of the Bunker Convention and the development of the
Hazardous and Noxious Substances Convention (although not yet in force) and its
2010 Protocol, ITOPF’s remit continues to widen. In the recent past it has advised on
spillages of cargoes as varied as containers and cereals.
This is a body that comprises oil companies which have an interest in the shipment
and terminal activities relating to crude oil and related products. It is a voluntary
organisation which lobbies for good marine safety standards on behalf of the
oil industry. Its stated mission is to be the foremost authority on the safe and
environmentally responsible operation of oil tankers and terminals, promoting
continuous improvement in standards of design and operation.
Like ITOPF it was founded in 1970 soon after the Torrey Canyon disaster had brought
to the public’s attention the dangers involved in the carriage of large quantities of
crude oil in tankers. OCIMF has some 90 members including all the oil majors.
OCIMF has consultative status at the IMO. It serves to co-ordinate the views of the oil
industry at IMO meetings and to review legislative and regulatory developments at
the IMO on behalf of its members. It has been one of the main drivers for improving
operational and safety standards for tankers, a drive born in part out of the need to
maintain a good public image for the oil industry.
OCIMF also produces numerous guidelines for its members either alone or in co-
operation with other industry bodies. These guidelines cover such varied issues as
piracy, lifeboat safety and mooring hawser strength. See www.ocimf.com for copies of
the relevant information papers.
Action Step: Find out more about the OCIMF Ship Inspection Report
Programme (SIRE) and how the inspections are conducted, when and by whom.
IACS, founded in 1968, is the international body representing the main classification
societies. It describes itself as dedicated to safe ships and clean seas, and seeks to
make a unique contribution to maritime safety and regulation through technical
support, verification, research and development. More than 90% of the world’s cargo-
carrying tonnage is covered by the design, construction and through-life compliance
rules and standards set by the nine member societies and one associate of IACS.
Intercargo is a trade association for operators of bulk carriers in the international dry
bulk trades carrying cargoes such as coal, grain, iron ore and other bulk commodities.
Its main role is to work with its members, regulators and other shipping associations
to ensure that shipping operates safely, efficiently, environmentally and profitably.
Intertanko was formed in 1970 and performs for the tanker industry a service similar
to that performed by Intercargo for the dry bulk sector. Its membership is open to
independent (non-oil company and non-state controlled) owners and operators of oil
and chemical tankers. Independent owners operate some 80% of the world’s tanker
fleet and the vast majority are Intertanko members.
The CDI was developed in the chemical industry to provide risk assessment systems
for the transportation and storage of bulk liquid chemicals. It was founded in Holland
in 1994 and is now managed by a board made up of representatives of the various
chemical companies. Its operational headquarters are now in the UK. It is the
counterpart for the chemical industry of OCIMF for the oil industry. All the world’s
major chemical companies are members.
It has several objectives which are centred on enhancing best practice surrounding
the safe storage and carriage of chemicals. The CDI provides inspection services for
both vessels and land-based installations to ascertain their compliance with regulatory
and industry standards.
Nautical Institute
The Nautical Institute is the international professional body for qualified seafarers
and others with an interest in nautical matters. It provides a wide range of services
to enhance the professional standing and knowledge of its members who are drawn
from all sectors of the maritime world. It offers its work to the industry in general, with
the objective of helping to improve the safety and efficiency of shipping.
The ISU represents the interests of professional salvors worldwide. Its members
provide essential services for the world’s maritime and insurance communities
through their engagement in emergency response, marine casualty response,
pollution response, wreck removal, cargo recovery, towage and related activities.
CHAPTER 5
MARITIME REGULATION
Chapter 5
Certification requirements 2
The IMO was set up by the United Nations (UN) in 1948 and first met in 1959
174 nations are members of the IMO and it has three associate members - Hong
Kong, China and Macao, China and the Faroe Islands. As noted in the previous
chapter, a number of international shipping industry organisations, including the
International Group of P&I Clubs, have consultative status at the IMO and can
The staff of the IMO numbers around 300 at its Headquaters in London, UK. As well
as its work on regulation the IMO is also heavily involved in education and training and
has set up three educational institutions:
The creation and development of ideas that form the basis for IMO conventions and
regulations is democratic in character with member states and non-governmental
organisations with consultative status all taking part in the process. Proposals for new
items on the IMO’s work programme and proposals for new, or amendments to existing,
mandatory instruments submitted by non-governmental organisations must be co-
sponsored by member governments.
If the main body of the IMO or other UN agency concerned gives agreement to a
new initiative the task is then delegated to the appropriate committee. Work in the
committees and sub-committees is undertaken by the representatives of member
states. The views and advice of intergovernmental and international non-governmental
organisations that have a working relationship with the agency concerned are also
welcomed in these bodies. Many of these organisations – such as the International
Group of P&I Clubs– have direct experience of the matters under consideration and are
therefore able to assist the work of the IMO in practical ways. The committee charged
with consideration of a new convention produces a draft document, which will then
be submitted to the Council and Assembly of the Organisation, with an accompanying
proposal for the scheduling of a specially convened conference, now commonly known
as a diplomatic conference, to consider the new convention. If agreed by the governing
bodies of the Organisation, a diplomatic conference will then be held to discuss and
adopt the new convention, based on the draft document developed by the relevant
Committee.
• Legal Committee;
• Facilitation Committee;
All states that are members of the IMO are invited to the plenary session of every
committee or sub-committee, together with any states who are members of the UN.
At such sessions, all IMO Member States have equal voting rights. In addition, UN
bodies and other organisations that have a formal relationship with the IMO can also
send delegations to the meetings.
Action Step: Go to the IMO website and find out what relevance the Titanic
disaster in 1912 has to international conventions still in use today.
A state can express its consent to be bound by a convention in the following ways.
Signature
Ratification
Accession
Most international conventions are open for signature for a specified period of time
after ratification and further provide that consent by accession is possible. Accession
is the method used by a state to become a party to a convention which it did not sign
while it was open for signature. It is a way of ratifying conventions already signed by
other states. Accession requires the state in question to deposit an instrument of
accession with the ’depositary’ country or organisation specified in the convention.
Once the required number of ratifications has been obtained a convention generally
comes into effect after a further period of time has elapsed in order to allow the
countries concerned to make the necessary legislative arrangements domestically to
implement its terms. This usually entails enacting the provisions of the convention
into national law. However, the fact that a convention has come into effect in some
countries does not mean that all IMO member countries will apply it. Indeed, many
conventions are only ratified and applied as part of their domestic law by a minority of
IMO member states.
It is also possible for a state or region to enact the provisions of a convention into
its domestic or regional law before the convention itself comes into force. Thus the
European Union introduced a requirement for the use of low sulphur fuel in port on 1
January 2010 whereas the equivalent IMO regime was not implemented until 2012.
Amendment of conventions
still adhere to the original convention, dating from 1957, others have adopted the
1976 version and yet others the 1996 version. After a casualty has occurred this
diversity often gives rise to ’forum shopping’ by the lawyers for the parties involved
to found jurisdiction in a country whose version of the Limitation Convention is most
advantageous for their respective clients.
Safety
Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Convention, 1974, as amended, in particular its main
safety protocols concerning:
• The International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) – Chapter XI-2;
• International Convention of Load Lines 1966 and the 1988 Protocol, in force
February 2000;
Pollution avoidance
• International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (CLC), 1969
• International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (CLC), 1992 - limits
increased in 2000, in force 2003;
• International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001, in
force 2008;
• Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea,
1974 – Protocol 2002, in force 2014;
• Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims (LLMC), 1957, 1976 and
1996 (see amendments of conventions previously discussed);
• International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law relating to Bills
of Lading (Hague Rules), 1924, in force 1931; The Hague-Visby Rules – Hague Rules
as amended by the Brussels Protocol, 1968, in force 1977; The United Nations
Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea, 1978 (Hamburg Rules), in force 1982;
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), also called the
Law of the Sea Convention or the Law of the Sea Treaty, defines the rights and
responsibilities of nations – rather than the shipping industry - in their use of the
world’s oceans, establishing guidelines for businesses, the environment and the
management of marine natural resources. The convention, concluded in 1982, came
into force in 1994. As of March 2021, there are 168 Parties to the Convention. It
imposes duties on and defines rights of states but it does not seek to regulate or
impose liabilities on the global shipping industry as such. It could be said that the
duties and aspirations to which states subscribe under UNCLOS are fulfilled in part by
their acceptance of the conventions published by the IMO.
The founding concepts of the ILO still form the basis of the Maritime Labour
Convention (MLC). The MLC was a codifying work to the extent that it sought to bring
together over 60 separate ILO labour standards, not all of which were implemented
by governments.
The flag state of a vessel to which the MLC applies, and any state party to the
convention administering a port where the vessel calls, may perform an MLC
inspection to ascertain whether it complies with the relevant standards required by
the MLC in relation to crew welfare, living conditions and financial security.
The MLC covers a wide range of matters concerning the employment conditions of
seafarers, such as working hours, standard of accommodation, health and safety,
working conditions, medical care, sick wages, the right to repatriation at no cost to
the seafarer and contractual compensation for injury sustained in a seafarer’s line of
duty. The MLC 2006 was amended by the ILO Governing Body in June 2014 following a
meeting of the MLC Special Tripartite Committee in the preceding April where certain
amendments were agreed. The amendments took effect in MLC States Parties from
January 2017. They also introduced new liability and financial security certification
requirements ensuring that seafarers may claim up to four months’ arrears of
contractual wages and up to four months of other contractual entitlements directly
from the security provider following abandonment or severance of ties by the owner.
The various obligations placed upon member states are, in many cases, set out in
general terms so implementation in national law will depend on the manner in which
each state gives effect to the provisions of the MLC domestically.
There are a number of provisions in the MLC, as amended, that are of direct interest
to International Group Clubs:
• and where the shipowner has unilaterally severed ties with the seafarer the seafarer
is entitled to contractual wages and entitlements;
• ships flying the flag of a state party must maintain financial security to ensure that
seafarers receive their entitlements in accordance with the MLC, as amended. Group
Clubs cover Members for the cost of maintaining, repatriating or deporting seafarers
in many circumstances, including injury or illness of a seafarer during the course of
their employment or following a casualty to, or wreck or loss of, the entered vessel;
The insurance cover provided by the Group Clubs can, if required, cover their
Members’ liability to pay compensation for personal injury, illness and death of
seafarers arising during the course of their employment and for such associated
costs as medical, hospital and repatriation expenses. However, in many jurisdictions
domestic employment legislation may require such insurance to be placed locally. A
few jurisdictions apply social schemes that entitle seafarers to claims for MLC liabilities
under such schemes.
The rights and responsibilities of flag states are laid down under UNCLOS (see The
The high seas are open to all states, whether coastal or landlocked. Freedom of the high seas is
exercised under the conditions laid down in this Convention and by other rules of international
law. It comprises, inter alia, both for coastal and landlocked States,
a) freedom of navigation;
Every State, whether coastal or landlocked, has the right to sail ships flying its flag on the high
seas.
This right comes with responsibilities. Indeed, the role of the flag state is central to the
proper administration of the world’s cargo-carrying ships and the application of the
network of international conventions described above.
Article 94 of UNCLOS requires each state to exercise its jurisdiction and control of
ships flying its flag by maintaining a register with particulars of all such ships except
those of very small tonnage (often defined as less than 500 tons) and applying its
domestic law and jurisdiction to the ship and its officers and crew. It is also required
to supervise the safety at sea of all its registered vessels including:
• appropriate qualification of officers and crew, and their familiarity with the
application of international regulations concerning safety of life at sea, the
prevention of collisions, the prevention, reduction and control of pollution and
communication by radio.
Some countries – for example, Denmark, France, Germany and Norway - require
shipowning companies within their jurisdiction to register their ships under the
national flag. Other countries operate open registries which are open to ships owned
by any nationality. Open registries developed particularly after the end of the Second
World War, led by Panama and Liberia. The reasons for choosing an open register
are varied and include protection from taxes, differences in national regulations, and
different labour wage scales. Today, more than half of the world’s merchant ships
(measured by tonnage) are registered under open registries, the so-called ‘flags of
convenience’ referred to in the chart in chapter 4 of this module.
A ship on bareboat charter may also be registered and in a different state from that
of the owner. This registration, in essence, temporarily permits a vessel to fly the
flag of another country while ownership continues to be registered in the underlying
(or owner’s) registry. It provides a welcome element of flexibility in a number of
commercial situations. Bareboat registration is specifically recognised in international
law as reflected in the provisions of UNCLOS.
A flag state accepting a ship transferring from the flag of another state should only
accept such a ship when it is satisfied that it is in compliance with international
requirements, and has survey reports confirming that the ship is in class. Flag states
whose ships transfer to other registers have an obligation to provide all necessary
information to the new flag state in which the ship is registered.
Infrastructure
A flag state should clearly have sufficient infrastructure, in terms of qualified and
competent staff, offices and equipment, to meet its obligations under international
treaties. Different flags have different approaches. For example, staffing may depend
on the extent to which flags delegate certain functions to bodies such as classification
societies.
Casualty investigations
In accordance with IMO Resolution A. 1075(28), and taking into account the provisions
of SOLAS and MARPOL, a flag state should carry out investigations of any ‘serious’ and
‘very serious’ casualty occurring to its ships, as soon as practicable after the casualty.
Flag states should also co-operate with other nations investigating casualties in which
ships flying its flag may be involved. The relevant findings of such investigations should
be forwarded promptly to the IMO, and should be made available to the industry and
other interested parties.
• IMO Council;
If possible, flag states should also participate in IMO diplomatic conferences and
relevant technical sub-committees of the IMO, as well as major maritime meetings
of the International Labour Organization. All flag states, particularly those from
developing countries which might benefit from technical assistance programmes,
should also be encouraged to attend meetings of the IMO Technical Co-operation
Committee.
Flag states should have some form of consultative process to enable ship operators
to engage in discussions about maritime regulatory developments and other issues
relevant to the safe operation of ships flying their flag; for example, through the
mechanism of a national shipowners’ association.
Certification
The flag state issues and monitors various levels of certification, some of which are
required for all vessels and some only in relation to specific activities. These include
safe manning certificates together with matters such as ship safety, oil pollution
prevention, loadline, safety management, ship security, and dangerous goods.
Flag states work alongside classification societies in relation to certain aspects
of inspection and certification, usually because they do not have the necessary
resources available on a worldwide basis. As an example of this co-operation, the
UK flag authority (Maritime and Coast Guard Agency) works closely with the various
class societies to minimise duplication of inspection and certification and to reduce
disruption to vessels trading from port to port, while ensuring that regulatory
requirements are complied with.
Supervision of surveys
In accordance with IMO Resolution A.739, flag states should establish appropriate
controls over so-called Recognised Organisations, such as classification societies,
Such controls should include determining that the Recognised Organisation has
adequate resources for the tasks assigned, and entering into a formal written
agreement covering the issues specified in A.739. Flag states should specify actions
to be followed in the event that a ship is not found fit to proceed to sea, and provide
information concerning national regulations that give effect to international maritime
conventions. A verification and monitoring system should also be established to
ensure the adequacy of work performed by organisations acting on a flag state’s
behalf.
Enforcement of conventions
As a minimum, flag states should have ratified and be prepared to enforce the
conventions described earlier in this chapter relating to:
ISM Code
The ISM Code’s underlying objective is to provide an international standard for the
safe management and operation of ships, and for pollution prevention. All ships over
500GT are required to comply. Investigations into maritime accidents over the years
have highlighted human error as a major cause, as well as identifying shortcomings on
the part of both ship and shore staff in the area of ship management.
The ISM Code seeks to address the human error issue in two fundamental ways.
Firstly, it requires all vessels to carry an operations guide containing instructions
and information for the safe and efficient operation of the ship. Secondly, it requires
• safety at sea;
• instructions and procedures to ensure the safe operation of ships and protection of
the environment, in compliance with relevant international and flag state legislation;
• defined levels of authority and lines of communication between and amongst shore
and shipboard personnel;
The fact that the ISM Code is mandatory should help to ensure compliance with the
rules and regulations and effective enforcement by flag states. The underlying hope
is that a safety culture will be developed and that, by creating an SMS, a shipowner or
operator can identify areas for ongoing improvement, thus leading to a reduction in
casualties.
Ships are audited every two years to ensure not only that they have a safety
management system but also that it is up to date and complied with. Audits are done
by the flag state authorities or by a classification society on the flag state’s behalf.
ISPS Code
The attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and on the Pentagon in
Washington in 2001 have led to a significant tightening of security in ports and other
places. At a special conference in 2002 the IMO implemented changes to the SOLAS
Convention under the heading ‘Special Measures to Enhance Maritime Security’.
The ISPS Code applies to all passenger ships, cargo ships above 500 gross tons,
and mobile offshore drilling units as well as to any port serving ships engaged in
international voyages. Every ship must have a nominated and trained ship’s security
officer (SSO) and every shipping company a nominated company security officer (CSO).
The requirements under the code are that vessels have a security plan and clearly
nominated personnel with responsibility for security and regular drills. The ISPS Code
has particular significance in preventing stowaways from boarding the ship and in
managing the ship in areas of high piracy risk.
Action Step: Check to see what information the Clubs have issued to their
members about the ISPS Code
IMDG Code
Many countries have their own national laws concerning the packing and carriage of
dangerous goods, and any movement of those goods must take into account the laws
of the country where the journey started, of any country through which the goods will
pass and of the country of destination.
The IMDG Code closely mirrors other codes for the carriage of dangerous goods by
other modes of transport published by the United Nations. It sets out rules for the
classification, packing and stowage of the goods, recognising that they need care and
attention and that some of them need to be kept well apart from other goods.
For easy reference the various categories of substance under the code have
identifying stickers that should be prominently displayed, for example, on the sides of
a container carrying the substances in question:
There are in fact only nine separate categories. The categories are as follows:
Class 1: Explosives
Explosives that fall into this class are generally subject to strict national legislation as
well as the IMDG Code;
Class 2: Gases;
The key danger here is the escape of fumes which may be both flammable and toxic;
These should be kept well away from combustible material. They can combust
spontaneously and some of them should be stored under controlled temperatures.
‘Oxidising’ means that the substance will give off oxygen, which will serve to fuel any
fire burning nearby. It also means combining with oxygen to produce an oxide – the
rusting process is a good example of this;
The movement of goods in this category often requires state approval. If goods in
this category are to transit the Panama Canal special permission is required from the
Panama Canal Authority. Radioactive material should be packed in special containers
and stowed as far away from the crew accommodation as possible;
If goods within this category escape from their containers (usually drums) there will be
a danger both to human health and other cargoes and to the structure of the ship;
Class 9: Miscellaneous
This class includes any other goods not within the previous classes that are deemed
to be dangerous. Given that it is quite normal for shipowners to charge more for the
carriage of dangerous goods there is a significant risk, particularly with containerised
cargo, that the goods inside will not be properly described. The onus is on the shipper
to clearly identify the goods inside the container, including the proper technical name
for chemicals. This enables the shipowner to consult the IMDG Code to ascertain the
correct loading and carriage requirements.
Dangerous goods should be segregated where possible and care taken to ensure that
goods that will react to water are not stowed close to items that have a water base or
that might give off water during the voyage.
Action Step: Find out what guidelines the Clubs have issued to members about
the carriage of calcium hypochlorite.
The key role played by the flag state in ensuring compliance with many aspects of
international law cannot be underestimated. However, some flag states are less
rigorous than others in requiring their shipowners to fulfil their obligations under the
international conventions discussed above.
Port state control (PSC) is a process by which a port state exercises authority over
foreign ships when those ships are in waters subject to its jurisdiction. The right to do
this is derived from both domestic and international law. States may enact their own
laws imposing requirements on foreign ships trading in their waters. In addition, states
which are party to IMO conventions are empowered to verify that ships of other nations
operating in their waters comply with the obligations set out in those conventions.
The purpose of PSC is to identify and eliminate ships which do not comply with
internationally accepted standards as well as domestic regulations of the state
concerned. When ships are not in substantial compliance, the relevant agency of the
inspecting state may impose controls to ensure that they are brought into compliance.
The maritime nations of the world have entered into nine separate international
agreements in relation to PSC called memoranda of understanding. The two largest
agreements in terms of members are called the Paris Memorandum of Understanding
on Port State Control (Paris MOU) and the Tokyo Memorandum of Understanding.
The Paris MOU was originally signed in 1982 and has as its members 27 maritime
administrations covering Europe and Canada. The Tokyo MOU has 18 members located
around the Pacific rim and came into effect in 1994. The United States of America is
party to neither agreement but port state control is conducted in US ports through the
US Coast Guard using the same underlying principles as the other MOUs state.
In this way most of the world’s significant ports are covered by similar MOUs on port
state control whereby vessels coming into the ports of a member country are subject
to inspection by a local port state control inspector to ensure their compliance with
the requirements of the relevant conventions. The MOU members have agreed to
inspect a percentage of the vessels coming into their ports and they use IMO and ILO
Ships are identified for inspection using a central database and any vessel inspected
within the last six months is not inspected again. Priority is given to ships falling within
certain categories, such as those which have not been inspected recently, those
released from ports with a list of deficiencies to remedy in a set period of time or
those which have had class suspended for safety reasons in the last six months.
The inspection starts with a vessel’s documentation and certificates, and then moves
on to a physical inspection of the overall condition of the ship, including engine room
and accommodation. If there is reason to believe that the provisions of any of the
relevant conventions are not being complied with, that procedures are not being
followed by the crew or that they are not able to communicate freely with each other,
a more detailed inspection is triggered.
If the ship passes the port state inspection the Master is advised and the information
recorded on the central database.
If a ship has serious deficiencies it can be detained by the port authorities. Where the
deficiencies are clearly hazardous to safety, health or the environment, the authorities
will ensure that the hazard is rectified before the ship is allowed to proceed to sea.
The vessel’s flag state will be notified as soon as possible.
If the deficiencies cannot be remedied in the port of inspection the authorities may
allow the ship to proceed to another port, subject to any appropriate conditions to
ensure that the ship can so proceed without unreasonable danger to safety, health or
the environment. In this case, a follow-up inspection is normally carried out at the next
port.
All ships detained are recorded on the website of both the Paris and Tokyo MOUs and
can therefore be viewed by any party, including underwriters.
Action Step: Go to the Paris MOU website and take a closer look at the ships
presently under detention with particular reference to the flag states and
classification societies to which they belong.
Note that the Paris MOU also provides statistics by the flag of the vessel and on
the basis of this information, it publishes a White List, a Grey List and a Black
List showing the ‘performance’ of individual flag states in ensuring regulatory
compliance of vessels registered to the flag.
process for shipping through the IMO is a process that seeks to build consensus
through its consultation procedures. On occasions, this can produce quick results, as,
for example, in the case of the adoption of the ISPS Code.
In a further effort to speed up the legislative process, the IMO has also adopted
the so-called ‘tacit acceptance’ procedure whereby amendments to IMO regimes
are deemed to have been accepted by a given date unless prior to that date a
given percentage of the parties to the convention have registered objection to the
amendments.
Where draft legislation is slow some countries and regions become impatient and act
unilaterally. The difficulty for the shipping industry when this happens is that it is faced
with a potential multiplicity of different laws and regulations depending on the areas
in which it is trading. All this adds to the complexity of the business and increases in
costs which ultimately have to be borne by the consumers of shipping services.
On 12 December 1999 the oil tanker Erika, broke in two 40 miles off the coast
of Brittany (France) resulting in more than 10,000 tonnes of heavy fuel oil being
discharged into the sea. The incident prompted the European Commission to propose
action at the European level in the form of the Erika packages that were, according to
the Commission:
The Erika I legislative package was announced in March 2000 and contained measures
on port state control, classification societies and double-hull oil tankers:
The Erika II package was presented in December 2000 and consisted of measures on
In January 2004, the European Commission then announced a third maritime safety
package of legislative measures, more commonly known as ’Erika III’, that ultimately
resulted in the adoption of the following EU Directives and Regulation:
2) Directive 2009/15/EC and Regulation (EC) No. 391/2009 on common rules and
standards for ship inspections and survey organisations;
6) Regulation (EC) No. 392/2009 on the liability of carriers of passengers by sea in the
event of accidents;
Some feel that it is unfortunate that a region including a number of major shipping
nations should decide to act outside the accepted parameters of the IMO process
since this threatens the cohesion of IMO on which so much of its success as an
international legislative body has depended.
The danger is that if other regions follow the example of the EU, the proliferation of
regional regimes would render compliance ever more difficult for shipowners and
would undermine the ultimate authority of the IMO to legislate for the industry on a
worldwide basis.
Equasis
The Equasis website was initially developed by the European Commission and the
French Maritime Administration. It collates safety-related information on ships from
both public and private sources and makes it available on the internet. It is additionally
supported financially by the maritime authorities of the UK, Spain, Singapore and Japan.
The main principles in setting up the Equasis information system are as follows:
• it has no commercial purpose but addresses a public concern and should act
accordingly;
• it needs active co-operation with all players involved in the maritime industry;
• it will be a tool used for better selection of ships on a voluntary basis and there will
be no legal pressure for industry to use it.
Action Step: Access Equasis and examine the information on various ships.
Ships’ Documentation
Compliance with the requirements of the various international, regional and national
laws and regulations which PSC authorities assess when vessels are inspected is
evidenced in part by certificates and documents which must be carried on each
vessel. Different types of ship require a different mix of documentation depending
on cargoes they carry but the overall burden on shipowners to have all regulatory
documentation up to date is very significant. To illustrate the complexity of the
administrative demands of the regulatory regime governing ship operations a
summary of the documents required published by IMO is set out in Appendix 1.
All Club Members are provided with a certificate of entry for vessels insured (’entered’)
which provides a reasonably detailed summary of the nature and extent of the
coverage provided to them. A Club certificate of entry is not strictly a ‘statutory
certificate’ since whether or not a ship has to have a certificate of entry on board
varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. However, since 1 January 2012 it has been
accepted as evidence of the compulsory cover as required by the European Union (EU
Directive on Insurance of Ship Owners for Maritime Claims, 2009/20/EC) as well as by
other coastal States for port entry purposes.
The certificate of entry details the name of the entered member(s), the name of the
vessel(s), the inception date (normally 20 February) and the particular heads of cover
that are excluded, for example, collision liabilities, fixed and floating objects liabilities
where cover for these are placed separately with the vessel’s Hull and Machinery
underwriters.
The terms of cover may be amended after inception. When this happens the Club
issues an endorsement to the certificate of entry, setting out the details of the
amendment and the date from which it is effective. Both the original certificate and
any subsequent endorsements must be taken into consideration.
Most Club rules provide that the certificate of entry and any endorsement to it are
conclusive evidence and binding as to the inception date, the terms and conditions of
cover and any variation thereof and its effective date.
The Civil Liability Conventions of 1969 and 1992 set out provisions governing the
liability of shipowners for oil spills from their vessels. These conventions apply widely
throughout the world although the versions in force vary from one country to another.
The conventions apply to all ships carrying persistent oil in bulk as cargo. All such
ships carrying 2000 tons or more of ‘persistent oil’ as cargo and flying the flags of
states party to the convention must carry a certificate confirming their ability to
pay claims in accordance with the provisions of the convention if there is an oil spill
for which they are responsible. This evidence is provided by International Group
Clubs in the form of a Blue Card addressed to the vessel’s flag state. On receipt of
the Blue Card the flag state issues the vessel with a CLC certificate. This is kept on
board the vessel as the necessary evidence. Since the 1992 convention imposes
greater liabilities on shipowners than the 1969 convention, states party to the 1969
convention will accept CLC certificates confirming cover for 1992 convention liabilities.
Blue Cards are often issued by Clubs in an electronic format although some flag states
do still insist on hard copies.
If a Club decides to cancel a Member’s cover it must give notice to the Member’s
flag state which has issued the CLC certificate. The issuing state must be given three
months’ notice from the date of termination of the Club’s cover. This means that the
Club has a potential exposure under its Blue Card issued to the flag state for three
months unless another certificate is issued on the basis of other arrangements
made by the ex-Member. If a claim arises during the notice period and the cancelling
Club has to pay claims under the Blue Card, its only recourse is to try to recover the
amount paid from the ex-Member who may well not be in a position to respond.
Other Conventions
The Athens Convention on passenger liabilities, the Bunker Convention, and the Wreck
Removal Convention all require owners to provide evidence of financial security.
The US government has not ratified either the CLC or the Fund Convention. In 1990
it enacted the Oil Pollution Act (OPA 90) which addresses the same issue as CLC -
ships’ liability for oil pollution – with much higher limits of liability than CLC. Within this
legislation is a requirement similar to that contained in CLC that any vessel trading to US
ports must show evidence of ability to pay for any pollution liability that it might incur.
The penalties for failure to comply are severe, ranging from daily fines or seizure of
the vessel to banning of a vessel from US ports.
Obtaining a COFR
Application is made to the US Coast Guard (USCG) supported by evidence that the
applicant will be able to pay for its liabilities or has insurance that will respond to the
required level. The options available on the USCG application form as security for the
issue of COFRs are insurance, surety bonds, financial guaranty, self-insurance or other
services.
International Group Clubs do not provide the guarantees that the US authorities
require for issuance of the COFRs because the Group’s policy is to support legislative
consistency throughout the world by encouraging adoption of IMO conventions rather
than unilateral legislation by individual states.
Specialist COFR guarantee providers such as the Shipowners Insurance and Guaranty
Company Ltd (SIGCo), Shoreline and Arvak have therefore entered the market. Their
sole role is to provide the financial guarantees that the US authorities will accept in
CHAPTER 6
LAW
Chapter 6
Limitation of liability 2
Limitation of time 2
• statute law;
Common law
The term ‘common law’ is used primarily to denote the law made (or interpreted) by
judges, based on decided cases. The development of the common law is governed by
the rules of precedence by which the reasons or principles of a decision given by a
higher court are binding on all lower courts.
The term has other meanings in other contexts. For example, it can be used to distinguish
between the common law and equity. In this sense it is distinguishing between two
different sources or systems of judge-made (judge-interpreted) law. These developed
separately over a period of some 500 years but were amalgamated by the Supreme Court
of Judicature Acts of 1873 and 1875. Today they are administered as two parts of the
same system.
It can also be used to distinguish between common law jurisdictions, such as England, the
United States of America and most of the former Dominions of the British Empire where
judges interpret the law; and the “civil law” jurisdictions in continental Europe and many
other parts of the world where the law is laid down by the legislature and written in a
comprehensive legal code rather than interpreted by the judiciary.
Civil law
In addition to the distinction between the common law and the civil law in the sense
described above, the term ‘civil law’ is also used to denote law that is not criminal law.
In this sense, civil law refers to the body of law that governs the relationships of people
and organisations with one another whereas criminal law is part of the law governing the
relationship of people and organisations with the state, as representing society in general.
Statute law
The term can be used to distinguish between the English common law and statute law
made by Parliament.
In addition to the statute law created through the parliamentary process, there is another
important source of statutory law in the United Kingdom today, namely the directives of
the European Union. The United Kingdom will not give effect to any EU Directive following
its withdrawal from the European Union on 31 January 2020, but such Directives already
implemented prior to this date will remain an important source of statute law in the
United Kingdom.
EU Directives are binding on the member states as to the result to be achieved. They must
implement the policy fully but they may choose the method of implementation, subject
usually to a time limit. If the provisions of a directive are unconditional, clear and precise
and intended to confer rights on the individual citizen, then the directive will have direct
effect, even before the implementing legislation has been enacted by the member state
concerned.
Under the treaties of the European Union, the final power of interpretation of directives
and regulations within member States lies with the European Court of Justice, based in
Strasbourg. This court is an independent entity with the function of ensuring that the
same interpretation of European legislation is applied in all the states of the European
Union.
a mutual agreement between two or more parties that something shall be done or forborne
(given up) by one or both; also, a writing in which the terms of a bargain are concluded; in
law, an agreement enforceable by law.
They are:
• that the parties have made an agreement through a process of offer and
acceptance;
• that the parties have provided ‘consideration’ to each other. This means that each
party has given the other, and in turn received from the other, something of value. In
this context, a promise in exchange for a promise counts as ‘something of value’ and
therefore amounts to consideration;
If all three elements are present, then – subject to certain exceptions – English law
recognises a legally binding contract. If one or more of these elements is missing the
arrangement will not be enforceable in law.
• the offer and acceptance must match exactly otherwise no valid agreement has
been made. An agreement ‘subject details’ is not enforceable as the parties have
not yet reached a final agreement on all terms. A ‘yes, but…’ answer is not a clean
acceptance – it is probably a counter-offer;
• there must be a meeting of the minds; the parties must have agreed on the same
thing. If they have not the contract will be unenforceable;
• if one party has been induced to enter into a contract in reliance on statements
made to them by the other party that turn out to be untrue, the innocent party will
be able to rescind – cancel - the contract;
• The parties must possess the legal capacity to enter into a binding contract. For
example, those under the age of majority do not in general have the capacity
to enter into an enforceable contract; neither do those who suffer from mental
incapacity;
• as a matter of public policy, the courts will not enforce a contract under which the
parties engage in unlawful activities.
These basic principles apply to every type of contract under English law but insurance
contracts have some additional and important aspects. Those relevant to P&I
contracts will be discussed below in the section on the Marine Insurance Act, 1906,
the Insurance Act, 2015 and the Enterprise Act, 2016.
Forms of contract
In general, English law does not require a contract to comply with any particular
formalities except for contracts relating to the sale or other disposition of an interest
in land. These must be in writing. Similarly, a contract of guarantee needs to be
evidenced, but not necessarily made, in writing. An oral contract is as enforceable at
law as a written contract provided its terms can be proved. Furthermore, a contract
may come into existence simply through the conduct of the parties. So a contract is
created by the sale of goods in a shop or by taking a ride on a bus or train although
no words may have passed between shopper and shopkeeper or between passenger
and driver or conductor.
Parties to a contract
The general rule in English law is that only the parties to the contract can have rights
and obligations under it. This means that a third party cannot acquire rights nor be
subject to any burdens under a contract to which they are not a party. This is so
even where the contract was specifically expressed to be for their benefit. In order
to obtain the contracted benefit the beneficiary has to persuade the promisee (the
person to whom the promise was made) to sue the promisor (the person who made
the promise) on their behalf. This doctrine is known as ’privity’ of contract.
This rule had its inconveniences. In the maritime context some of the inconveniences
of the doctrine were alleviated by the development of the so-called ‘Himalaya’ clause,
named after a vessel involved in a particular legal case involving this issue. Under
this clause servants, agents and sub-contractors of the contracting party, usually the
carrier by sea, were able to take advantage of defences to and limitations of liability
Radical changes to the doctrine of privity have been introduced by the Contracts
(Rights of Third Parties) Act, 1999. This act aimed to provide a simple mechanism by
which two contracting parties could give a third party the right to enforce, in its own
name, a term of their contract to its benefit.
English common law has developed a number of specific torts such as nuisance,
trespass, defamation and conversion. In the shipping and insurance industries the
most important tort is that of negligence, as it is relevant to almost all types of loss
and damage encountered at sea and the insurance provided for them. The tort of
negligence has the following four requirements:
1) the existence in law of a ‘duty of care’ between the parties to which the law
attaches liability to carelessness;
2) a breach of the duty of care by the tortfeasor in that their conduct failed to
measure up to the standard set by the law (and from which damage has resulted);
4) a causal connection between the tortfeasor’s careless conduct and the damage.
The particular kind of damage to the particular claimant must not be so unforeseeable
as to be so remote that it would be unjust to hold the tortfeasor responsible for it.
The origin of the modern doctrine of the tort of negligence in English law is usually
taken to be the case of Donoghue v Stevenson which concerned an allegation by a
consumer against a manufacturer that the contents of a bottle of ginger beer were
contaminated by the decomposed remains of a dead snail (whether or not the
remains of the snail were ever there in the bottle was never determined).
In trying to formulate some general principles for the guidance of the courts in the
future, the judge described what has come to be known as the ‘good neighbour’
principle in the following terms:
The rule that you are to love your neighbour becomes, in law, you must not injure your
neighbour and the lawyer’s question, “Who is my neighbour?” receives a restricted reply. You
must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee
would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who, then, in law, is my neighbour? The answer
seems to be – persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought
reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my
mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question.
Subsequent case law has developed the concept to the point where a three-stage test
was formulated by which for a duty of care to arise:
1) there should exist between the party owing the duty and the party to whom
it is owed a relationship characterised by the law as one of ‘proximity’ or
‘neighbourhood’;
3) the situation should be one in which the court considers it fair, just and reasonable
that the law should impose a duty of a given scope on the one party for the benefit
of the other.
A shipowner would clearly owe a duty of care to those who come on board the ship
as visitors, including stowaways, and to those such as stevedores who use the ship’s
equipment in the course of their work. A shipowner will also owe a duty of care
to all other ships in navigating their ship with particular reference to the Collision
Regulations established by the Convention on the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs). Similarly, a carrier of cargo owes a duty of care
to the contractual cargo carried on board the vessel, and a port authority or terminal
operator owes a duty of care to ensure that visitors are not injured on its premises.
Strict liability
Whereas the tort of negligence requires a breach of a duty of care before the
tortfeasor can be held liable, there are other torts where liability does not depend
on such a breach. In these torts liability follows from the action taken regardless
of whether the tortfeasor has acted without due care. In such circumstances, the
tortfeasor is said to be strictly liable.
Statutory liability
Under English law, the conditions under which a statutory liability arises are usually
set out in the relevant law. Sometimes the statutory liability is based on negligence but
often on the basis of strict liability.
Examples of statutory liability are those introduced into English law to give effect to
international conventions. Thus the Merchant Shipping Act, 1995 introduces into
English law the provisions of:
• The International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (CLC);
• The Convention on the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea (Athens
Convention);
Damages
Whereas the consequences of a breach of a statutory liability are usually spelt out
in the relevant statute, the consequences of a breach of contract on the one hand,
and of committing a tort on the other, are that the innocent party is entitled to
compensation. This usually takes the form of monetary damages.
The philosophy that underlies the award of damages differs as between contract
and tort. In a case of breach of contract, the objective is to put the innocent party
back in the position in which it expected to be, had the contract been performed
in accordance with its terms. The damages in such a case are called ‘expectation
damages’. In tort the damages are designed to put the innocent party back in the
state they were in before the tort was committed. Such damages are described as
‘compensatory’ damages.
Punitive damages
In some legal systems, most notably the United States’ systems, ‘punitive’ or
‘exemplary damages’ may be awarded in addition to compensatory damages. Punitive
or exemplary damages are not designed to recompense the victim but to punish
the wrongdoer in cases where their conduct is seen as flagrant or outrageous. In
the case of the oil spill caused by the grounding of the Exxon Valdez in Alaska Sound
in 1989, punitive damages were awarded against Exxon, the owners of the vessel,
in the amount of US$5bn. These were later reduced to US$2.5bn. On appeal to the
The English courts do not award punitive damages but they will, in certain cases,
award what are known as ‘aggravated damages’. It has long been recognised that
aggravated damages may only be awarded in very limited circumstances. They tend
to be claimed most frequently in libel cases and so are unlikely to be relevant to
maritime claims under English law.
If the term of the contract that has been breached is a key provision of the contract
the innocent party may have the right, in addition to their claim for damages, to bring
the contract to an end. Similarly, if the innocent party has been induced to enter into
the contract in reliance on a statement made by the other party that turns out to be
untrue, they may have the right to rescind the contract from the very beginning.
Class actions
Some tortious acts can affect many or even many hundreds of people. Instead of
individuals suing the alleged tortfeasor on their own, English law provides a means
by which they can group together to sue as one entity and share the litigation costs.
In England such actions are taken by means of a group litigation order (GLO) issued
under the Civil Procedure Rules in cases which ‘give rise to common or related issues
of fact or law’.
A claimant wishing to join group litigation must apply to be entered on the group
register that the court establishes for each case. Judgement on one or more of
the GLO issues will bind all of the claimants on the group register. Take up of this
procedure has so far been modest – a list of GLOs is published on the court website.
The development of the ‘class action’ in the United States of America has been more
vigorous. There the action is regulated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The
trial judge determines, by reference to a number of established criteria, whether a
proposed class can be ‘certified’.
• Predominance – the common issues of fact and law must predominate over
individual ones;
• Damages.
Once a class has been certified notice has to be given to all class members. A class
member may then decide to opt out of the class action if they believe that their case
is better than the class case. If they do not opt out they will then be bound by the
outcome of the class action and will not be able to bring their own individual case.
Class actions are very frequent in the US courts where they have been used to great
effect in the fields of securities, anti-trust and product liability litigation as well as in
maritime cases.
There is a clear move within the European Union to facilitate class actions in the
future. This is seen as a means of improving access to justice, particularly for
consumers and small businesses. The UK government, however, favours a cautious
approach.
Action Step: Research the Exxon Valdez case and find out what you can about the
class actions that followed.
What sort of individuals made up the class, who were they suing and why?
6.5 Limitations
Limitation of liability
A right to limit liability means that a person who is in breach of contract or who is a
tortfeasor can restrict or cap the amount of money that they might have to pay as
damages to the other party or parties.
Limitation of liability in relation to maritime matters in English law dates back to the
18th century. The concept was introduced as a matter of public policy to encourage
investment in shipping, then, as now, a high-risk business. In the course of time other
nations adopted a similar approach.
The limit of liability varies as between claims for loss of life and personal injury on the
one hand and damage to property on the other. The size of the limitation amount
varies with the size of the ship, as measured by its tonnage.
In extreme circumstances a defendant can lose the right to limit their liability. For
example, under the 1976 Limitation Convention, the right to limit is lost if it is proved
that the loss resulted from the defendant’s personal act or omission, committed with
the intent to cause such a loss or recklessly and with knowledge that such loss would
probably result.
This test is much stricter than that applicable under the 1957 Convention. There, the
right to limit was lost if the casualty in question had resulted from the ‘actual fault or
privity’ of the owner. The stricter test was imposed as a counterweight to the greatly
increased limits introduced by the 1976 Convention. The rationale was that if the
shipowners and their insurers were to subject to these new high limits then it was fair
that the limits should be (virtually) unbreakable.
The United States of America has not signed or ratified either of the limitation
conventions. A shipowner’s right to limit its liability in the United States of America in
respect of a maritime casualty is governed by the Shipowner’s Limitation of Liability
Act. The limitation amount is based on the value of the ship at the end of the voyage (if
damaged, in its damaged condition) and pending freight. Where the ship is a total loss,
or a constructive total loss, and no freight is at risk, the resulting limitation amount
could be nil.
Under this act, an owner will not be permitted to limit where the casualty resulted
from negligence or a condition of unseaworthiness which was within their ‘privity
or knowledge,’ that is, of which they were, or should have been, aware. For these
purposes, the term ‘owner’ includes any member of management acting within the
scope of their duties.
Partly because, in certain cases, the limitation amount would be zero or close to zero
the courts in the USA have interpreted the ’privity’ concept against defendants to deny
them the right to limit in circumstances in which a defendant would be able to limit
liability under international conventions.
Limitation of time
This act provides that action in tort or contract must be brought within six years of the
date on which the cause of action arose. Where the damages claimed are in respect of
personal injuries to the plaintiff or any other person, then the claim must be brought
within three years from:
These general time limits for suit can be amended either by agreement between the
parties or by specific statutory provisions.
An example of a contractual time limit is the three-month time limit for commencing
arbitration contained in a standard form of charter contract or the nine- month time
limit for suit that is frequently found in the standard trading conditions of freight
forwarders.
An example of a statutory time limit under English law is the one-year time limit for
suit against the carrier by sea found in the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1971 which
incorporates the Hague-Visby Rules.
The Marine Insurance Act, 1906, the Insurance Act, 2015 and the
Enterprise Act, 2016
The Marine Insurance Act of 1906 (MIA) is headed ‘An Act to codify the Law relating
to Marine Insurance’. As a codifying act, its objective was to state the law on marine
insurance as it stood in 1906, in the light of the developments that had taken place in
the previous 200 years or so.
The English law of marine insurance has been further developed by case law since the
act came into force and, with effect from August 2016, the MIA has been amended by
the Insurance Act, 2015 (the 2015 Act), which received Royal Assent on 12 February
2015. In addition, the Enterprise Act, 2016 (the 2016 Act) received Royal Assent on 4
May 2016, and entered into force on 4 May 2017. While the MIA has not been repealed,
and most of its provisions remain unaffected and in force, certain key provisions of MIA
have been amended by the 2015 Act. The Insurance Act 2015 introduced substantial
changes to the laws governing disclosure in non-consumer insurance contracts,
including contracts with marine insurers. The 2015 Act set out new rules in relation to
warranties and other contractual terms, and when insurers are allowed to reject a claim.
The MIA provides specifically that it applies to mutual insurance, except for its provisions
relating to premium, and that where its provisions may be modified, this can be
achieved in Club Rules. Prior to the 2015 Act, it was usual for the Clubs operating under
English law to include in their rules a provision that subjects the contract to the MIA.
Following the passing of the 2015 Act, Clubs whose rules are subject to English law have
introduced more detailed provisions dealing with the application to Club cover of the
provisions of the 2015 Act.
Action Step: Find the provisions in the rules of a Club which state the insurance
law to which they are subject.
Much of the MIA is devoted to hull and cargo insurance, rather than liability insurance.
The First Schedule to the MIA sets out the standard terms of the Lloyd’s SG policy (on
Ship and Goods) which had been in use since the 18th century, together with rules for
the construction of that policy.
The provisions of the MIA are set out under a number of headings. Some of the
provisions which are of importance to P&I insurance are briefly summarised below.
a contract whereby the insurer undertakes to indemnify the assured, in manner and to the
extent thereby agreed, against marine losses, that is to say, the losses incident to marine
adventure.
Section 3 of the MIA then defines ‘marine adventure’ to include any ship, goods
or other moveables (‘insurable property’) that are exposed to maritime perils and
any liability to a third party that may be incurred by the owner of, or other person
interested in or responsible for, insurable property, by reason of maritime perils.
Unless otherwise agreed by the Managers in writing, a Member is covered against the risks
set out in Sections X-XX below [which will almost entirely represent liabilities to third parties]
in respect of any insured vessel.
Note that a marine policy may be extended to protect the assured against any land
risk which may be incidental to any sea voyage – a provision that has increased
significance with the introduction of door-to-door transport in the container trades.
Insurable interest
It is a basic principle of insurance law generally that the law will only recognise and
enforce the terms of a policy if the insured has an insurable interest in the subject
matter of the policy. The MIA provides that every person has an insurable interest who
is ‘interested in a marine adventure’. A person is ‘interested in a marine adventure’
under the Act where the person ’stands in such a relationship to the adventure or to
any insurable property at risk in it that they might benefit from its safe arrival or be
prejudiced by its loss, damage or detention, or may incur a liability in respect of it.’
The assured has to have an interest in the subject matter of the policy at the time
of the loss. They need not have an interest at the time the policy is put in place. This
is particularly important in the case of cargo insurance where the beneficiary of the
policy is each successive purchaser.
If the assured does not have an insurable interest and has no expectation of acquiring
one, then the policy is deemed to be a policy by way of ‘gaming or wagering’. Such a
contract is void. The MIA prescribes in what circumstances a person will be regarded
as having an insurable interest.
The 1906 Act set out a principle that is peculiar to contracts of insurance and other
contracts of a fiduciary nature, namely that such contracts are contracts of ’the utmost
good faith’ or ’uberrimae fidei’. This has the effect that if the utmost good faith was not
observed by one party to the contract, then the contract could be avoided or set aside
by the other party.
The ‘utmost good faith’ character of insurance contracts had a profound effect on
the duty of the insured in negotiating the contract with the insurer. The insured (or
broker on the insured’s behalf) was required to disclose every ’material’ – relevant
– circumstance that was known to the insured.. The insured was also deemed to
know every circumstance that the insured ought to know in the ordinary course of
business. A circumstance would be ’material’ if it would influence the judgment of a
prudent insurer in fixing the premium or determining whether they will take the risk.
The test was both objective and subjective in that the information must have been of
sufficient significance to have influenced the judgment of both a hypothetical objective
and prudent underwriter, and the actual underwriter who wrote the risk. Therefore,
if the actual underwriter would not have been influenced by a given circumstance,
had it been disclosed, the assured was not in breach of their duty of disclosure even
if, from the point of view of a hypothetical objective and prudent underwriter, the
circumstance would have been material.
The 1906 Act provided some guidance as to what circumstances might not be
material in the absence of enquiry by the underwriter. These are as follows:
• any circumstance which was known, or presumed to be known by the insurer. The
insurer was presumed to know matters ‘of common notoriety or knowledge’ and
matters which an insurer ought to know in the ordinary course of their business;
In addition to their obligation under the 1906 Act to make full material disclosure, the
insured was also required to ensure that any material representation (statement) that
they made in the negotiations for the insurance was true. A representation may be
either as to a matter of fact or as to a matter of expectation or belief. A representation
as to a matter of fact must have been true and it was true if it is substantially correct
- in other words, that the difference between what was represented and what was
actually correct would not be considered material by a prudent insurer. Where the
representation was as to a matter of expectation or belief it was treated as true if it
was made in good faith. A representation could be withdrawn or corrected before the
contract was concluded and where this was the case, the original misrepresentation
became irrelevant.
Although the insurer may have had the right to avoid the policy, they were not bound
to do so. The insurer could, if they wished, waive their right to avoid the policy and
confirm it. If they did so, they still retained the right – in the case of misrepresentation
but not in the case of non-disclosure – to claim damages. This right arises under the
Misrepresentation Act 1967. This introduced into English law the right of the innocent
party to claim damages – either in addition to or in substitution for the right to avoid
the policy – where the misrepresentation in question had been made in good faith.
The law had always recognised the right of the innocent party to claim damages where
the misrepresentation had been fraudulent.
The MIA provided that a court or arbitration tribunal considering a claim for avoidance
– cancellation - could declare the insurance contract as existing and award damages
instead if it appeared equitable to do so. It is difficult, however, to envisage examples
Why did the law impose such draconian consequences upon an insured who made
a misrepresentation or failed to make full disclosure? The insured knows, or should
know, all that there is to know about the risk they are seeking to insure. The insurer,
on the other hand, will know nothing or next to nothing of the particular risk being
offered to them, other than what the insured is telling them. If the insurer decides, on
the basis of what they are told, to accept the risk, which may involve them in paying
losses many times greater than the premium they will receive, then it is only just that
they should be able to escape from the deal should the information given to them
turn out to be false or incomplete.
The interpretation by the courts of the ’utmost good faith’ disclosure obligation
under the MIA resulted in many complexities and inconsistences. This obligation is
replaced under the 2015 Act by a duty to make a ’fair presentation’ of the risk (Section
3-7 of the 2015 Act). The new duty shares many of the features of the current MIA
duty of disclosure, although greater emphasis is given to the insurers’ roles in the
process of disclosure, with a Member potentially fulfilling its duty of fair presentation
by disclosing sufficient information to put the Club on notice that it needs to make
further enquiries.
Further, the remedies for breach of the duty to make a ’fair presentation’ of the risk
will be different, depending on whether they are deliberate or reckless breaches,
when avoidance is allowed, or innocent breaches, where a series of different remedies
are available (Section 8 of the 2015 Act). These include: where the insurer can prove
that but for the breach they would not have entered into the contract at all, avoidance;
where cover would have been provided but on different terms, the inclusion of those
different terms; where a higher premium would have been paid, a proportionate
reduction with right of recovery.
In the law of marine insurance, the word ‘warranty’ has a particular meaning. In the
MIA, a warranty is defined as a:
promissory warranty, that is to say, a warranty by which the assured undertakes that
some particular thing shall or shall not be done, or that some condition will be fulfilled, or
whereby he affirms or negatives the existence of a particular state of facts.
For example, an owner may warrant to their P&I Club that their vessel is engaged only
in the carriage of crude oil. If, without the permission of their Club, the owner then
engages the ship for the carriage of other cargo, their P&I cover comes automatically
to an end, without any intervention by the Club itself. The MIA provides that a warranty
is a condition that must be complied with exactly, whether or not it is material to the
risk. If it is not complied with:
the insurer is discharged from liability as from the date of the breach of warranty, but
without prejudice to any liability incurred by him before that date.
This is the case even where the breach has been remedied and the warranty complied
with before the loss occurs.
There are some circumstances in which a breach of warranty may be excused. Thus,
non-compliance is excused when, because of a change of circumstances, the warranty
ceases to be applicable to the circumstances of the contract or when compliance with
the warranty is rendered unlawful by any subsequent law. Furthermore, an insurer,
once they know about the breach, can decide to waive it.
In the context of P&I insurance, Member/Club relationships can be put at risk where
an unintentional breach of warranty has deprived the Member of their cover. Of
course, the situation could be righted if the Club agreed to waive the breach. In order
to avoid embarrassment of this nature, underwriters in the commercial market and
in the Clubs often qualify a warranty with the words ‘or held covered on terms to
be agreed’. The effect of these words is that, should a breach of warranty occur, the
insured does not automatically lose their cover; they have the right to require its
continuance on terms to be agreed with the insurer. If no agreement can be reached
the court will require the insurer to continue cover on the terms that a ‘prudent
underwriter’ would have agreed.
Warranties may be express or implied. The MIA contains several provisions covering
whether or not, and to what extent, a warranty is to be implied. Perhaps the most
important from the P&I point of view is that which states that in a time-policy - a policy
covering a period of time, such as a Club policy running from 20 February in one
year to 20 February in the next - there is no implied warranty that the ship shall be
seaworthy at any stage of the adventure. But the section goes on to provide that:
where, with the privity of the assured, the ship is sent to sea in an unseaworthy state, the
insurer is not liable for any loss attributable to unseaworthiness.
The position under a voyage policy is different. In this case, the MIA requires that,
at the commencement of the voyage, the vessel shall be seaworthy for the purpose
of the particular adventure insured. ‘Seaworthy’ is defined as ‘reasonably fit in all
respects to encounter the ordinary perils of the seas of the adventure insured’.
In the case of warranties, the strict position under the MIA has been diminished under
the 2015 Act, particularly in relation to the consequences of a breach of warranty.
Under the 2015 Act:
1) the ’basis of contract’ clauses (which were commonplace in club rules) which
convert all statements made by an insured when applying for insurance into
warranties, are ineffective (Section 9 of the Act);
3) warranties or other terms, except those which affect the risk as a whole, will not
discharge the insurer from liability where the insured can prove that the relevant
breach would not have increased the risk of the loss which actually occurred
(Section 11 of the Act).
Fraudulent claims
The MIA made no express provision in relation to fraudulent claims. These were
dealt with under common law principles, resulting in a lack of clarity with regard
to an insurer’s right to refuse payment of genuine claims arising subsequent to
the commission of a fraudulent act but before this was discovered or the policy
terminated. The 2015 Act clarifies the law by providing expressly that an insurer will
not be liable for a fraudulent claim, can recover any sums already paid in respect of
such a claim and, by notice, can terminate the contract with effect from the date of the
fraudulent act (Section 12 of the Act).
Double insurance
Double insurance describes the situation where for some reason the insured has
two or more policies that cover the same subject matter against the same risks. In
personal insurance this happens quite frequently because the general public is not
always aware of the extent of certain coverages it already has and buys more without
realising the overlap.
Where there is double insurance, the act provides that the insured may claim against
the insurers in such order as the insured chooses, but the insured will not be entitled
to recover more than the loss they have sustained. In claiming against one insurer the
insured must give credit for any recovery made from the other insurer. As between
the insurers each is bound to contribute rateably to the loss in proportion to the
amount for which they are liable under their contract. If one insurer pays more than
their proportion of the loss then they have the right to bring an action for contribution
against the other insurers.
Where there is double insurance in respect of liabilities, the likelihood is that the loss
will be equally apportioned between the two insurers subject to any special terms in
one or other of the policies. This is also the case where both policies contain ‘double
insurance’ clauses under which there is no cover for risks that are insured elsewhere.
Rather than give literal effect to such clauses, which would leave the insured without
cover for a risk that they had insured twice, the court will apply the equitable principle
of contribution, and require each insurer to contribute to the loss, usually on an equal
basis.
Deviation
The concept of deviation in the MIA is of particular importance to P&I insurers. The
act provides that the insurer is discharged from liability from the time of a deviation
when a ship, without lawful excuse, deviates from the voyage contemplated by the
policy, regardless whether the ship may have regained its route before any loss
occurs. Its significance in the P&I context is that a shipowner unreasonably deviating
from the contracted voyage may be deprived of the defences and limitations of liability
that they would otherwise have had under their contract of carriage. Without these
defences and limitations the shipowner and their Club would be exposed to a claim
without contractual defences and limitations. This has led the Clubs to exclude from
their standard cover liabilities arising from an unreasonable deviation. In practice, the
shipowner will usually arrange in advance special insurance against the deviation risk
with the help of their Club.
Assignment
Under the MIA, a marine policy is freely assignable unless it contains terms specifically
forbidding such assignment. Cargo policies are generally freely assignable to enable
them to pass from sellers to buyers down the transaction chain. However, both hull
and P&I policies contain clear wording forbidding assignment of the policies without
the express consent of the insurer. The rules of one Group Club read as follows:
No insurance given by the Association and no interest under these rules or under any
contract between the Association and any member may be assigned without the agreement
of the Managers in writing. Any purported assignment made without such agreement shall
be void and of no effect unless the Managers in their discretion otherwise determine.
In practical terms, a Club generally facilitates its Members by permitting the P&I cover
to be assigned to a bank provided that the Member and the bank agree the terms
of the Club’s standard ’Loss Payable Clause’. This clause permits the Club to handle
the insurance with the Member and to pay all claims directly to the Member without
reference to the bank, unless and until the bank gives the Club written notice that
the Member is in default under the mortgage agreement. If that happens then all
payments made by the Club thereafter will be re-directed to the bank.
The MIA provides that, unless the policy provides otherwise, the insurer is liable for
any loss ‘proximately caused by a peril insured against’ and they are not liable for any
loss ‘which is not proximately caused by a peril insured against’. What this means in
practice is that when a claim is caused by a number of different factors the court will
have to determine which one of them was the proximate cause. This is particularly
important if some of the causes are insured perils, whereas others are not. The
proximate cause is not necessarily the last cause in a chain of causes; rather it is the
dominant cause – an issue that has to be determined on the basis of common sense.
Issues of causation can arise in claims under a P&I policy as they can under any other
type of policy.
In addition to stating the general principle of proximate cause the act lists three types
of loss for which an insurer will not be liable. They are:
• any loss attributable to the wilful misconduct of the assured. This is qualified by the
provision that, subject to the terms of the policy, the insurer is liable for ‘any loss
proximately caused by a peril insured against, even though the loss would not have
happened but for the misconduct or negligence of the Master or crew’. This makes
clear that the wilful misconduct that avoids cover under the policy must be that of,
or very close to, the ‘governing mind of the company’, that is to say, at board or,
possibly, senior executive level. This is a high burden of proof for an insurer to meet;
• unless the policy provides otherwise, any loss proximately caused by delay, even
though the delay be caused by an insured peril;
• unless the policy provides otherwise, ordinary wear and tear, ordinary leakage
and breakage, inherent vice or nature of the subjectmatter insured, or any loss
proximately caused by rats or vermin.
While the exclusion of inherent vice is primarily a matter of cargo insurance it has
an importance in relation to P&I claims. Where the cargo interest has difficulties in
recovering their loss from cargo insurers because the claim is, in their view, one of
inherent vice, they will pursue their claim against the shipowner more vigorously.
Measure of indemnity
In the same way, the MIA has detailed provisions regarding the measure of indemnity
(the amount which an insured is entitled to recover under the policy) in respect of
many types of claim. The fundamental point is that the insured is not entitled to
recover more than the loss the insured has sustained.
As regards claims under a third party liability insurance the act provides:
Where the assured has effected an insurance in express terms against any liability to a
third party, the measure of indemnity, subject to any express provision in the policy is the
amount paid or payable by him to such third party in respect of such liability.
The term ‘sue and labour’ is a term that derives from the Lloyd’s SG policy form. That
policy reads:
And in case of any loss or misfortune it shall be lawful to the assured, their factors, servants
and assigns, to sue, labour, and travel for, in and about the defence, safeguards, and
recovery of the said goods and merchandises, and ship, etc., or any part thereof, without
prejudice to this insurance; to the charges whereof we, the assurers, will contribute…
In modern language we would probably refer to ‘sue and labour’ as mitigation – that
is to say, the steps taken by the insured after the casualty to minimise any loss arising
from it. The act specifically provides that it is the duty of the insured and their agents:
in all cases, to take such measures as may be reasonable for the purpose of averting or
minimising a loss.
P&I insurers regard this obligation of the insured as sufficiently important to set it out
specifically in the Club Rules. The relevant provision from the rules of one Club reads:
It shall be the duty of the member and his agents at all times whether before, at the time of,
during or after the occurrence of any event or matter liable to give rise to a right of recovery
by a member from the Association to take all such steps … as may be reasonable for the
purpose of averting or minimising any expense or liability in respect of which he may be
covered by the Association.
Insurance policies frequently provide cover for the expenses incurred in ‘suing and
labouring’. Where they do so, the act makes clear that the:
engagement entered into is supplementary to the contract of insurance, and the insured
may recover from the insurer any expenses properly incurred pursuant to the clause,
notwithstanding that the insurer may have paid for a total loss.
In the P&I context, a typical ‘sue and labour’ clause might read as follows:
A. Extraordinary costs and expenses… reasonably incurred on or after the occurrence of any
casualty, event or matter liable to give rise to a claim upon the Association and incurred
solely for the purpose of avoiding or minimising any liability or expenditure against which
the Owner is wholly or, by reason of a deductible, partly insured by the Association, but only
to the extent that those costs and expenses have been incurred with the agreement of the
Managers or to the extent that the Directors in their discretion decide that the Owner should
recover from the Association. [Emphasis added]
Note the importance of the word ‘solely’; expenses must be incurred only for the
purpose of limiting a claim on the Club and incidental expenses incurred for other
reasons cannot therefore fall as sue and labour.
The main driver for the changes contained in the 2015 Act was the protection of
consumers rather than commercial contracting parties. The 2015 Act, recognising the
difference in the knowledge of and the need for protection of commercial as opposed
to consumer contracting parties, contains a number of ’contracting out’ provisions.
With the exception of ’basis of contract’ clauses, commercial parties can contract out
of the new provisions discussed earlier and the Law Commission, during the drafting
process, envisaged that there would be widespread contracting out in sophisticated
markets, identifying marine insurance in particular.
Consideration was given by the Group to the impact of the new provisions, and to
whether or not Clubs should contract out of any or some of these provisions, and the
following recommendations were made to, and adopted by, Club boards:
The new obligation to provide a fair presentation of the risk was perceived to be
favourable to the insureds. In particular, the insured’s obligation can be discharged,
not only by disclosure of all material facts but also by sufficient disclosure overall
to put a prudent insurer on notice that further enquiries are required. Conversely,
greater burden will be placed on insurers to ensure that all relevant material internal
information is available to the relevant underwriter. Similarly, changes to the law
in respect of what an insured or its agents knows, or is deemed to know, for the
purposes of discharging their obligations, are said to make the duty on the insured
less onerous. However, as a practical matter the relationship between a Club and
its Member is a close one. Both are sophisticated market participators, and entry or
renewal discussions are detailed and focused. A fair presentation, and a professional
assessment of the risk, are what both owners and Club would aspire to.
Accordingly, the Group managers recommended that Clubs accept the new
fair presentation regime in Sections 3–7 of the 2015 Act. On the other hand,
recognising the importance within a mutual of proper disclosure, it was nevertheless
recommended that provisions in Section 8 of the 2015 Act, in relation to remedies for
breach, were excluded, so as to reassert the principle that the failure to make a fair
presentation of the risk will allow the avoidance of the policy.
(ii) Warranties
So far as concerns warranties or other conditions of cover, for example, the warranty
or condition that the Member will comply with any requirement of class, the practice
adopted in relation to the provisions of the MIA was that cover is suspended during
the period of breach, so that the Member will not be entitled to any recovery from
the Club in respect of any claim arising during that period except at the discretion of
the directors of the Club. The 2015 Act broadly reflects Club practice, save in respect
of claims not causally connected with the relevant breach. However, again bearing in
mind the mutual nature of the risk and the availability of the directors’ discretion in
appropriate cases, the Group managers recommended that Clubs should contract out
of Sections 10 and 11 so as to preserve the status quo.
Finally, whilst the clarification as to the treatment of fraudulent claims was seen as
helpful, the new 2015 Act provisions give rise to one important issue. Where an
insurance contract confers benefits on third persons who are not parties to the
insurance contract, the submission of a fraudulent claim by that third person will
not affect the rights of the parties to the contract (Section 13 of the 2015 Act). The
Pooling Agreement allows claims otherwise covered but asserted against persons
who are affiliated to or associated with the Member but not entered in the Club, to be
eligible for pooling. In the event that a fraudulent claim is submitted by an affiliate or
associate of a Member, it seems clear that such fraud should have the same impact
on the Members as provided by Section 12 of the act.
The 2016 Act entered into force on 4 May 2017 and includes one amendment to
the new 2015 Act, by implying into all contracts of insurance a term requiring the
reimbursement of claims within a reasonable time. The 2016 Act introduces certain
remedies for breach of that implied term including the possibility for the insured to
claim interest. Bearing in mind the mutual nature of the risks insured, and the manner
in which claims are handled by Clubs and under the International Group pooling
arrangements, these provisions did not appear to be appropriate in relation to the
cover provided by Clubs, and the eight affected Group Clubs elected to contract out of
this provision and to maintain the long-standing exclusion of the payment of interest
on Members’ claims. However, insurers will not be permitted to contract out of the
implied term in circumstances where the insurer deliberately or recklessly fails to
reimburse an insured’s claim within a reasonable time. Club Members will therefore
be protected to that extent.
Once an insurer has made a payment to an insured, it is then entitled to take over the
rights of the insured and is subrogated to all the rights and remedies of the insured
in respect of the subject matter of the claim as from the time of the event causing the
loss. The word ‘subrogate’ means to take the place of another person in respect of
their legal rights. This entitles the insurer to pursue recovery against any third party
who might be responsible for causing the loss that the insurer has paid. In the P&I
context this occurs frequently because cargo underwriters, having paid a claim to the
cargo interests for loss or damage to the cargo that occurred during the sea carriage,
claim indemnity from the P&I Club’s Member for breach of the contract of carriage.
P&I insurers can themselves exercise rights of subrogation when they believe that
some third party is responsible for the claim which they have reimbursed to the
Member. This occurs, for example, in the case where the Member is liable under the
bill of lading for cargo damage but the damage was in fact caused by the Member’s
subcontractor such as a stevedore or a terminal operator. The Club rules provide
that, if a recovery is made, the Club is entitled to keep it up to the amount reimbursed
to the Member with interest. If the claim was subject to a deductible borne by the
Member then the interest will be divided between Club and Member pro-rata to the
amount paid by each.
APPENDIX 1
Appendix 1
4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT
LONDON SE1 7SR
Telephone: +44 (0)20 7735 7611 Fax: +44 (0)20 7587 3210
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
19 July 2017
2 This work was carried out in accordance with the provisions of section 2 of the annex
to the FAL Convention concerning formalities required of shipowners by public authorities on
the arrival, stay and departure of ships. It is reiterated that these provisions should not be read
as precluding a requirement for the presentation for inspection by the appropriate authorities
of certificates and other documents carried by the ship pertaining to its registry, measurement,
safety, manning, classification and other related matters.
4 This circular lists only the certificates and documents that are required under
IMO instruments and it does not include certificates or documents required by other
international organizations or governmental authorities.
5 This circular should not be used in the context of port State control inspections for
which convention requirements should be referred to.
6 Member Governments are invited to note the information provided in the annex and
take action as appropriate.
***
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 1
ANNEX
(Note: All certificates to be carried on board must be valid and drawn up in the form corresponding
to the model where required by the relevant international convention or instrument)
1 SLS.14/Circ.115, Add.1, Add.2 and Add.3 refer to the issue of exemption certificate.
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 2
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 3
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 4
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 5
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 6
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 7
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 8
Records for pilot ladders used for pilot transfer SOLAS 1974
All pilot ladders used for pilot transfer shall be clearly regulation V/23.2.4
identified with tags or other permanent marking so as to
enable identification of each appliance for the purposes of
survey, inspection and record keeping. A record shall be
kept on the ship as to the date the identified ladder is
placed into service and any repairs effected.
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 9
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 10
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 11
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 12
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 13
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 14
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 15
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 16
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 17
A certificate called a Special Trade Passenger Ship Space SSTP 73, rule 5
Certificate shall be issued under the provisions of the
Protocol on Space Requirements for Special Trade
Passenger Ships, 1973.
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 18
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 19
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 20
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 21
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 22
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 23
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 24
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 25
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 26
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 27
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 28
The 2008 SPS Code applies the every special purpose ship
of not less than 500 GT certified on or after 13 May 2008.
Diving systems
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 29
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx
FAL.2/Circ.131
MEPC.1/Circ.873
MSC.1/Circ.1586
LEG.2/Circ.3
Annex, page 30
Noise levels
___________
I:\CIRC\MEPC\01\MEPC.1-CIRC.873.docx