Navigating the intricacies of a literature review can be a daunting task for many students and

researchers. One of the most challenging aspects is conducting a meta-analysis within the literature
review. This process involves synthesizing and analyzing data from multiple studies to draw
meaningful conclusions. However, it requires a deep understanding of research methodologies,
statistical analysis, and subject matter expertise.

Writing a literature review that includes a meta-analysis requires meticulous attention to detail and a
comprehensive understanding of the research topic. It involves conducting a thorough literature
search, identifying relevant studies, extracting relevant data, and synthesizing findings from different
sources. Additionally, researchers must critically evaluate the quality of the studies included and
assess the overall strength of the evidence.

Furthermore, performing statistical analysis for a meta-analysis requires advanced analytical skills and
knowledge of statistical software. Researchers need to calculate effect sizes, conduct subgroup
analyses, and assess heterogeneity among studies. Interpreting the results of a meta-analysis requires
a nuanced understanding of statistical significance and practical significance.

Given the complexity and time-consuming nature of conducting a meta-analysis within a literature
review, many students and researchers seek professional assistance. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers
expert services to help you with your literature review needs. Our team of experienced writers and
researchers can assist you in conducting a comprehensive literature search, synthesizing evidence,
and performing meta-analysis. With our help, you can ensure that your literature review meets the
highest standards of academic excellence.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review overwhelm you. Order from ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔ today and let us help you create a literature review that showcases your research expertise and
contributes to the advancement of knowledge in your field.
A systematic review, however, includes entirely different components that reflect the specificity of its
research question, and the requirement for transparency and inclusion. Like meta-analysis, subgroup
analysis and meta-regression are advisable only in certain circumstances. Guyatt G, Cairns J,
Churchill D, Cook D, Haynes B, Hirsh J, et al. Part 3: pearls and pitfalls of meta-analyses and
systematic reviews. And because of the specificity of the research question, typically a systematic
literature review involves more than one primary author. Nevertheless, rapid reviews are a feasible
alternative when parameters for computational modelling need to be valued. Funded through the
ESRC’s Researcher Development Initiative. This question, in and of itself, is highly focused to match
the review of the literature related to the topic at hand. Class 3 Professor Doutor Joao Fonseca
Introducao a Medicina II. Pubrica Assessing Evidence-Based Practice in Physical Therapy: A
Multifaceted Mixed-M. We welcome others who have been through the process, to add useful hints
and tips, and up-to-date resources particularly relevant to researchers and students at UJ. Wen Dang
supervised the study design and provided advice, review, and content modification. The consensus
reporting guidelines for different study designs proposed by EQUATOR ( ) are a useful starting
point. Knee arthroscopy versus conservative management in patients with degenerative knee disease:
a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e016114. Essilfie A, Kang HP, Mayer EN, Trasolini NA,
Alluri RK, Weber AE. An overview of what has been studied More than a summary. Emerg Infect
Dis. 2017;23(5):765.. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Liang X, Bi S, Yang
W, Wang L, Cui G, Cui F, et al. The extracted data depends on the research question, but it may
include information such as sample size, patient characteristics, length of study, and a statistical
measure, such as confidence interval, odds ratio, risks ratio, mean difference, or hazard ratio. 4.
Analyze Data Once you have organized it, your next step is to analyze the data using statistical
software. Locations and Hours UCLA Library Research Guides Biomedical Library Guides
Systematic Reviews Types of Literature Reviews What Makes a Systematic Review Different from
Other Types of Reviews. This suggests that in the future, HBV prevention focus should be on the
highest-prevalence areas and high-risk populations. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I,
Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. In our subgroup analysis, the
prevalence of HBV was highest among studies in the eastern regions of China. Meta-analysis is a
specialised type of systematic review which is quantitative and rigorous, often comparing data and
results across multiple similar studies. From these results the most relevant will be identified.
Important terms and concepts conveyed as index terms and synonymous keywords, such as Medical
Subject Headings, must be collected using Boolean operators AND, OR and NOT. Even though
there is a considerable similarity of features between meta-analysis and systematic reviews the two
are not same. In a meta-analysis, the researcher must standardize the results of the various studies
being used. People aged ?18?years old showed a higher HBV prevalence. They address the entire
systematic review process, from locating, screening, and selecting studies for the review, to
synthesizing the findings (including meta-analysis) and assessing the overall quality of the body of
evidence, to producing the final review report. Quantitative literature review Synthesize the results
of previous studies. Related Articles How to read a funnel plot This blog introduces you to funnel
plots, guiding you through how to read them and what may cause them to look asymmetrical.
Hepatitis B and C virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a review of epidemiology
and control measures. Primary care physicians need evidence for both clinical practice and for public
health decision making. And, we have meta-analysis, which combines the results from several
studies and provides a quantitative measure of the effectiveness of an intervention. Systematic
reviews have the potential to produce information-rich databases which permit extensive secondary
analysis. Explore data (heterogeneity) Synthesize the data descriptively and inferentially via meta-
analysis if appropriate. Meta-analysis is an increasingly popular tool for summarising research
findings. Abhinav S Appeptite stimulants and suppresents.pdf Appeptite stimulants and
suppresents.pdf Koppala RVS Chaitanya Dental Hygiene Library session Searching - 2nd class
Dental Hygiene Library session Searching - 2nd class HVCClibrary 1. As a result of the large-scale
migration, a substantial number of HBV carriers, infected individuals, and those without HBV
antibodies could have migrated to those areas. But narrative synthesis doesn’t just describe the
included studies: it also seeks to explain the gathered evidence, for example by looking at similarities
and differences between the study findings and by exploring possible reasons for those similarities
and differences in a systematic way. Pubrica - has extensive experience in conducting meta-analysis
a. This means that a meta-analysis is a mathematical tool that allows researchers to mathematically
combine outcomes from multiple studies. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
( ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the
data. Thus, a systematic review is where you might find the most relevant, adequate, and current
information regarding a specific topic. No nationwide studies were identified in this meta-analysis
from 2018 to 2022, there is a need for more systematic estimates of nationwide HBV prevalence.
Guyatt G, Cairns J, Churchill D, Cook D, Haynes B, Hirsh J, et al. It’s very important to keep a
meticulous record of why you included or excluded each article. While we excluded review articles,
the citations of identified systematic reviews or meta-analyses were examined for additional eligible
studies. An annotated bibliography might suffice for a literature review. Learn about the different
methods of meta-analyses and explore some examples. The next steps, S elect appropriate studies, E
xtract data, A nalyze data, and S ynthesize data, are represented by the SEAS in the acronym. 1.
Define Research Question and Review Literature Meta-analyses begin with defining the research
question. When multiple studies are addressing the same problem or question, it’s to be expected that
there will be some potential for error. Finally, the review team synthesises the extracted study data
(perhaps using meta-analysis) and presents the results. Reviewing the literature for studies that
answer your research question comes after your question has been defined. Heterogeneity means
diversity (and is the opposite of homogeneity). Often, your educational institution provides you with
access. Time. A professional systematic review is a time-consuming process: it will take the lead
author about six months of full-time work. The purpose of systematic literature reviews is simple.
This is a group of about six people who have experience in the topic you’re researching. Random
Effect Models The Mean Effect Size and Associated Statistics. Consequently, the weight of this
study is only 6.7%, which is lower than the others. The advent of evidence-based medicine has
increased the demand for systematic methods to analyze and synthesize clinical evidence.
The exact information will depend on your research question, but it might include the year, study
design, sample size, context, research findings, and conclusions. Characteristics of age groups of the
studies included in the meta-analysis Additional file 4: Table S3. A systematic review is a summary
of the medical literature that uses explicit and reproducible methods to systematically search,
critically appraise, and synthesize on a specific issue. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2(1), 10.
Hites R. A. (2004). Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in the environment and in people: a meta-
analysis of concentrations. Of these 141 people, 1 person experienced the adverse outcome that the
forest plot summarizes. Note: Protocols for scoping reviews can be published in all the same places
as traditional systematic reviews except PROSPERO. Doctors need reliable information on such
problems and on the effectiveness of large number of therapeutic interventions, but the information
sources are too many, i.e., nearly 20,000 journals publishing 2 million articles per year with unclear or
confusing results. Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative tears of the meniscus: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Assess the quality of studies The steps undertaken in evaluating the study quality
are early definition of study quality and criteria, setting up a good scoring system, developing a
standard form for assessment, calculating quality for each study, and finally using this for sensitivity
analysis. Examining the heterogeneity of effect estimates within the primary studies is perhaps the
most important task in a meta-analysis. A discussion of your knowledge about the topic under study
A discussion of your knowledge that is supported by the research literature. Alison Brettle, Research
Fellow (Information) Salford Centre for Nursing, Midwifery and Collaborative Research University
of Salford. Aims. The objective is to create an estimation about the studied phenomenon, for
example, the intervention’s effectiveness. Find the studies. Abstract the data. Assess quality of the
data. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the data made available
in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Strengths of Meta-Analysis Uses
explicit rules to synthesise research findings Can find relationships across studies which may not
emerge in qualitative reviews Does not (usually) exclude studies for methodological quality to the
same degree as traditional methods Statistical data used to determine whether relationships between
constructs need clarifying Can cope with large numbers of studies which would overwhelm
traditional methods of review Load More. Every aspect of a systematic literature review, including
the research protocols, which databases are used, and dates of each search, must be transparent so
that other researchers can be assured that the systematic literature review is comprehensive and
focused. Methodologies for a new era summer school School of Applied Social Studies, University
College Cork 20 June 2011 Dr Paul Montgomery. Aims. 1) Discuss the advantages and main features
of systematic reviews 2) Introduce basic principles of meta-analysis. One cannot combine the above
different data one meta-analysis. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: clinical versus statistical
significance. Investigation on the status of hepatitis B virus infection and the vaccination situation
among primary school students in Yunnan province. Experts: Contact experts in the field to ask if
they have unpublished studies that should be included in your review. JBI maintains a page with
other materials for scoping reviewers. Share This Book Main Navigation Menu Systematic reviews.
Although meta-analysis can increase the precision of a result, it is important to ensure that the
methods used for the reviews were valid and reliable. Systematic reviews result in high-quality
secondary data that concretely substantiates the case made. A meta-analysis is a mathematical
synthesis of the results of two or more primary studies that addressed the same hypothesis in the
same way. For example, a systematic review will focus specifically on the relationship between
cervical cancer and long-term use of oral contraceptives, while a narrative review may be about
cervical cancer. The researcher should now be able to answer these questions and provide a written
summary of the results. Nikolakopoulou A, Higgins JPT, Papakonstantinou T, Chaimani A, Del
Giovane C, Egger M, et al.