Crafting a comprehensive literature review, especially a systematic one, is an intricate task that

demands meticulous attention to detail and a profound understanding of the subject matter. The
process involves not only extensive research but also the ability to synthesize and critically analyze a
myriad of academic articles, books, and other scholarly sources.

One of the primary challenges faced by individuals undertaking a systematic literature review is the
sheer volume of information available. Sorting through numerous publications to identify relevant
and high-quality sources can be a daunting and time-consuming process. Additionally, maintaining a
coherent and logical structure throughout the review requires a keen organizational skill set.

Furthermore, the need for an in-depth understanding of research methodologies, data collection
techniques, and the theoretical frameworks employed in various studies adds another layer of
complexity. Researchers must not only comprehend the content of each source but also evaluate its
methodological rigor and reliability.

As a solution to these challenges, individuals seeking assistance in compiling a systematic literature

⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ specializes in providing tailored literature reviews, ensuring that each section is
meticulously curated to meet the specific requirements of the research topic. By availing such
services, individuals can save valuable time, reduce the stress associated with the literature review
process, and ultimately receive a well-crafted and academically sound document.

In conclusion, while the task of creating a systematic literature review may seem daunting, seeking
assistance from reputable platforms like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ can streamline the process and enhance
the overall quality of the review. With experienced writers at the helm, individuals can confidently
navigate the challenges of literature review writing and produce a document that meets the highest
academic standards.
Title: The title should accurately reflect the topic under review. SLRs are a research method used to
write an entire journal article. A systematic review is more exhaustive than a literature review as it
includes both published and unpublished literature, often called grey literature. Distillersr needs
subscription eppi reviewer subscription free trial or ahrqs srdr tool free which is web based and has a
training environment tutorials and example templates of systematic review data extraction forms.
The basic goal of the literature review is summarizing and justifying the research. Experiential
(qualitative) reviews analyze human experiences in a cultural or social context. Keep in mind that
finishing it could take longer than a year. Today, young researchers wish to start publishing articles
early on in their career. Taking this into account we aim to summarise recent data on the
epidemiology of impetigo and scabies and describe the current evidence around approaches to
individual and community based treatment. ? 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The
British Infection Association. This type of review is common in technological and scientific fields
but can be applied to any discipline. You should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias
and strengthen analysis. Thesis Literature Review Template apu.edu Details File Format PDF Size:
506 KB Download This PDF contains a flow chart for writing a custom literature review. Were the
groups similar in terms of prognostic factors. Before you start, you may want to brainstorm some
common themes that you will use to analyze the sources (e.g., participant characteristics,
measurement tools, results). Our sample literature review documents contain examples, guidelines,
and sample brief information about literature review writing and research paper. They are self-
contained pieces of writing that can function as a stepping stone to a larger piece of writing or can
enhance writers’ understandings of a topic. References: The References section of a systematic
review article usually contains an extensive number of references. This will make it easier for you to
write the review article. Develop research protocol A research protocol is a detailed plan for how you
will study a biomedical or health sciences problem. The first stage in carrying out a systematic
literature review is to put together your team. It’s best to formulate a detailed plan for how you’ll
present your systematic review results. Careful planning will also help you to provide insightful
analysis. An in-depth academic publishing course for young researchers. We conducted a systematic
review of clinical trials and observational studies that address the utility of SXT for SSTI treatment,
caused by either GAS or Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant (MRSA). Choosing a
Journal is a critical decision that decides the fate of an article and the rapidity of publication. We
identified 196 studies, and 15 underwent full text review by 2 reviewers. Most journals expect
authors of systematic reviews to use the PRISMA statement or similar other guidelines to write their
protocol. Observational studies, which mainly focused on SSTI due to S aureus, supported the use of
SXT when compared with clindamycin or ?-lactams. Of 10 randomized controlled trials, 8
demonstrated the efficacy of SXT for SSTI treatment including conditions involving GAS. Look for
patterns in authors’ approaches or in their methodological handling of the topic. Create a data
extraction form and set your reviewers to work extracting data from the qualified studies. Changes in
approach over time can be seen after publication information has been compared, so be sure to place
the authors within their own historical context too.
The PRISMA Statement is a document that consists of a item checklist and a flow diagram and aims
to guide authors on how to develop a systematic review protocol and what to include when writing
the review. The process includes conducting systematic reviews, meta-analysis, clinical practice
guidelines and methodology research. ( Mayo Clinic Science of Health Care Delivery: Robert D.
Systematic review protocols should include details such as: objectives of your project; specifics on
the methods and processes that will be used; eligibility criteria for individual studies such as study
design; how data will be extracted from individual studies; and what analyses will be performed.
After that, there is an option to highlight the key points and give recommendations for future
studies or research. Consider how each source approaches your topic in addition to their collective
points of intersection and separation. Our sample literature review documents contain examples,
guidelines, and sample brief information about literature review writing and research paper. See Full
PDF Download PDF About Press Blog People Papers Topics Job Board We're Hiring. Steps for
writing a systematic review, how to write a systematic review article. Cochrane Handbook for
Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Check the basic literature review format and elements used in
the example. Target Audience A literature review can be a thesis or a research paper essay. Use a
checklist to determine whether studies meet how to write a systematic review article criteria of the
protocol. Before starting a systematic review, you should search these databases for any registered
reviews on the topic of your choice. You also want to search outside the normal academic publishing
model. Because of differences in how we extract data from sources and what information is
relevant, the analysis within and structure of our literature reviews will vary. The Cochrane
Handbook provides detailed guidance on interpreting results and drawing conclusions. Seek
professional input on your specific circumstances. It is helpful to follow this process and make notes
at each stage. In a critical review, the reviewer not only summarizes the existing literature, but also
evaluates its strengths and weaknesses. Literary review templates are surveys of scholarly sources on
a specific subject matter. Apply appropriate grading of your evidence and consider the strength of
your recommendations. Title: The title should accurately reflect the topic under review. They find
that the literature compellingly demonstrates that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels
significantly influence the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Keywords used in the data search
included: food, naturalness, natural content, and natural ingredients. There are also several extra
points that may be clarified with the literature review examples. Download Free PDF View PDF
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim (Cotrimoxazole) for Skin and Soft
Tissue Infections Including Impetigo, Cellulitis, and Abscess Asha Bowen Skin and soft tissue
infections (SSTI) affect millions of people globally, which represents a significant burden on
ambulatory care and hospital settings. For stand-alone historiographies, include an introduction, body
paragraphs, and a conclusion. Unlike embedded literature reviews, which appear as part of a larger
piece of work, stand-alone literature reviews are a self-contained piece of writing that can be read on
their own (Figure A.2). Once researchers have selected a topic, the first step in their research
methodology is often the stand-alone literature review. Also, you get a guide on literature review
strategies through sample examples. Include information on the thesis, perspective, historical
approach, arguments, sources, and methodology.
Helpful Professor. Search for a Study Guide Search Ready to Write your Essay. Evidence for
standard treatment of skin infections predominantly stem from hospital-based studies in high-income
countries. These can include heterogeneity, which is when studies’ lines within the forest plot don’t
overlap with any other studies. To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more
securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. From here, identify the purpose or
thesis for your topic. A copy of this completed form will be available via the intranet to help others
carrying out reviews in the future and to avoid duplicating work already undertaken in the centre.
We like that! Why don't we give you complete access. SLRs differ from stand-alone literature
reviews because they follow a rigorous review protocol that is objective and comprehensive so other
researchers may replicate the work. Changes in approach over time can be seen after publication
information has been compared, so be sure to place the authors within their own historical context
too. Create a data extraction form and set your reviewers to work extracting data from the qualified
studies. Document details such as: databases you searched and what years those databases covered;
dates the searches were first run and updated; details of strategies used, including search terms; and
numbers of results obtained. Home Health Sciences Libraries All subject guides. Ask us. Health
Sciences Library. Email us. Table of contents What is a systematic review. This can be used to better
inform healthcare planning and resource allocation. It attempts to collect all existing evidence on a
specific topic in order to answer a specific research question. There might have been gaps in the
existing knowledge or a disagreement in the literature that necessitated a review. Systematic review
protocols should include details such as. Embedded literature reviews must discuss the connections
between the sources you used for your research and also make connections between your work and
these sources. Your systematic review should include the following details: the objectives of your
project the specific methods and processes that you’ll use the eligibility criteria of the individual
studies how you plan to extract data from individual studies which analyses you’re going to carry
out. Usually, it’s unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it
to the working plan. Use specific authors or sources as examples, and be sure to explain any
similarities or departures in approach, methodology, findings, or argument. The kinds of questions
you'll come up with are: Were the participants really randomly allocated to their groups. The purpose
of having a protocol is to promote transparency of methods. When you’ve answered the main
questions and achieved the set goals, sharing your thoughts is a wise solution, especially if you
disagree with something and need to support any points of view. Medical professionals read
systematic literature reviews to stay up-to-date in their field, and granting agencies sometimes need
them to make sure there’s justification for further research in an area. The screening of studies should
be performed by 2 reviewers. Secondary research — the basics of narrative reviews, systematic
reviews, and meta-analysis 6 min read. Observational studies, which mainly focused on SSTI due to
S aureus, supported the use of SXT when compared with clindamycin or ?-lactams. Of 10
randomized controlled trials, 8 demonstrated the efficacy of SXT for SSTI treatment including
conditions involving GAS. Sometimes individuals must meet them adequately, understand the
difficulties and determine their main priorities, deciding what to examine and how to start writing. A
classic systematic literature review can take different approaches: Effectiveness reviews assess the
extent to which a medical intervention or therapy achieves its intended effect. See Full PDF
Download PDF About Press Blog People Papers Topics Job Board We're Hiring.
Develop research protocol A research protocol is a detailed plan for how you will study a biomedical
or health sciences problem. Writing a systematic literature review can feel like an overwhelming
undertaking. But there’s no need to worry about the quality of the writing if you get inspired by the
examples presented here. Systematic review protocols should include details such as. A minimum of
two is a good rule of thumb, with a third to serve as a tiebreaker if needed. You have to be very
careful and ensure that you do not miss out on a single one. Home Health Sciences Libraries All
subject guides. Ask us. Health Sciences Library. Email us. Table of contents What is a systematic
review. Related services Health Sciences Libraries' systematic review service. They’ll be glad to
develop new custom literature review examples for your personally. It typically includes a title,
abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references. We identified 196 studies, and
15 underwent full text review by 2 reviewers. Stand-alone literature reviews are the most common
type of literature review and are frequently assigned by professors. Skin infections (sores, scabies
and fungal infections) were the largest proportion (16%), with ear infections (15%) and upper
respiratory infections (13%) also high. The protocol for your systematic literature review should
include: the objectives of your project the specific methods and processes that you’ll use the
eligibility criteria of the individual studies how you plan to extract data from individual studies
which analyses you’re going to carry out For a full guide on how to systematically develop your
protocol, take a look at the PRISMA checklist. Also, be sure to adhere to your style guidelines
because headings, title pages, references lists, and other sections or formatting features may differ.
This PDF contains a red highlighter mark that describes the key points. Studies in English published
between August 1994 and September 2016, with the subject of bacterial skin infections involving
Indigenous children and conducted in Australia, New Zealand, the USA or Canada were selected.
For example, kinesiologists studying heart disease will review the literature to identify acceptable
measurement methods, whereas anthropologists researching intersections of culture and technology
need to examine the literature to identify different categories of analysis. Definition A systematic
literature review is a summary, analysis, and evaluation of all the existing research on a well-
formulated and specific question. But, as with any documentation, we can break them down into the
sections that should be included A young researcher's guide to a systematic review Editage Insights
Types of articles: A guide for young researchers. According to the National Institutes of Health NIHa
protocol serves as a road-map for your review and specifies the objectives, methods, and outcomes
of primary interest of the systematic review. Systematic reviews are regarded as the best source of
research evidence. Interpret and present the results. 1. Decide on your team When carrying out a
systematic literature review, you should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias and
strengthen analysis. It gives a general summary of information relevant to a certain research problem
or question. The carefully examined examples can be like a treasure with multiple tips. Although you
may write a stand-alone literature review as a course assignment to enhance your own knowledge as
a student, scholars often write stand-alone literature reviews to benefit the research community and
discipline. In this guide, we will cover: the definition of a systematic literature review the purpose of
a systematic literature review the different types of systematic reviews how to write a systematic
literature review. Assign at least 2 reviewers to extract data from the included studies, how to write a
systematic review article. A systematic review involves detailed scrutiny and analysis of a huge mass
of literature. International journal of clinical practice, 69 (11), 1257-1267.
For stand-alone historiographies, include an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Don’t
miss out on “gray literature” sources: those sources outside of the usual academic publishing
environment. Registration forms are used in almost all walks of life for several purposes. Re.
Facebook A square shape with Facebook's logo Facebook Twitter Square with the Twitter logo inside
Twitter Pinterest A square with Pinterest logo inside Pinterest Youtube Rectangle with Youtube logo
inside YouTube Instagram Square with the Instagram logo Instagram. Create a data extraction form
and set your reviewers to work extracting data from the qualified studies. The inclusion of English-
language articles only will certainly introduce bias, but is often necessary when resources are not
available for translation. You must have a clear understanding of the important people, series of
events, places, or times that were involved with your topic. Many higher institutes and universities
ask students to write literature reviews in the final year. Make an assessment checklist that closely
aligns with your research protocol, including a consistent scoring system, calculations of the quality
of each study, and sensitivity analysis. You may want to add these new headings to your Matrix to
remind you to critically appraise the sources according to this new criteria. It operates by utilizing
clustered contigs as a guide throughout the assembly process. This reduces the chance of bias and
improves the reliability of the results. Check the basic literature review format and elements used in
the example. After all, they can often take 6 to 18 months to complete. He holds a PhD in education
and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. The structure will help you to clearly express
your ideas and demonstrate how your sources are connected. After all, they can often take 6 to 18
months to complete. The available protocol registries for systematic reviews are. But, as with any
documentation, we can break them down into the sections that should be included A young
researcher's guide to a systematic review Editage Insights Types of articles: A guide for young
researchers. In this guide, we will cover: the definition of a systematic literature review the purpose
of a systematic literature review the different types of systematic reviews how to write a systematic
literature review. These hacks help you understand how to prepare your literature research correctly,
avoiding numerous common mistakes. Create a table of study results and prepare a forest plot to
demonstrate the relative strength of treatment effects, how to write a systematic review article, if
relevant. Finally, the strengths and weaknesses of the review should be discussed, and implications
for current practice suggested. Their objective is to synthesize evidence through meta-analysis, a type
of SLR that employs statistical analyses. Systematic review protocols should include details such as.
All the templates are available in easy to download Microsoft Word doc and Adobe Acrobat pdf
format right here Literature Review Template Sample tru.ca Download Literature Review Template
Example smumn.edu Download Literature Review Format kent.ac.uk Download Literature Review
Example Template aut.ac.nz Download Literature Review Template Free cmu.edu Download If you
have any DMCA issues on this post, please contact us. The evidence for treatment in resource-limited
settings is less clear, as studies in these populations may lack randomisation and control groups for
cultural, ethical or economic reasons. You may start with writing research questions and objectives.
The final stage of conducting a systematic literature review is interpreting and presenting the results.
It typically includes a title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references.
This reduces the chance of bias and improves the reliability of the results. Facebook A square shape
with Facebook's logo Facebook Twitter Square with the Twitter logo inside Twitter Pinterest A
square with Pinterest logo inside Pinterest Youtube Rectangle with Youtube logo inside YouTube
Instagram Square with the Instagram logo Instagram. This article is part of a Series Series Types of
articles: A guide for young researchers Today, young researchers wish to start publishing articles early
on in their career. It gives a general summary of information relevant to a certain research problem or
question. The registries also provide a searchable database of registered reviews. Systematic review
protocols should include details such as. Unlike embedded literature reviews, which appear as part
of a larger piece of work, stand-alone literature reviews are a self-contained piece of writing that can
be read on their own (Figure A.2). Once researchers have selected a topic, the first step in their
research methodology is often the stand-alone literature review. We like that! Why don't we give you
complete access. This is common in the social sciences and humanities. Scandinavian Journal of
Management, 31(3), 387-408. Explain why this has been the case and how these approaches enhance
or limit current understandings of the topic. Title: The title should accurately reflect the topic under
review. Read and analyze this sample document for writing a literature review. For example, groups
of scholars disagree about the best way to measure a physiological event, and as a result, use
different instruments and methodologies. Keep in mind that it could take longer than a year
complete. There might have been gaps in the existing knowledge or a disagreement in the literature
that necessitated a review. This class was beneficial to me because in some of the areas it force. A
librarian will help you select databases relevant to your topic and create a detailed search strategy.
Using the Libraries during COVID Four campus libraries are open for Twin Cities students, faculty,
and staff with valid U Cards. A copy of this completed form will be available via the intranet to help
others carrying out reviews in the future and to avoid duplicating work already undertaken in the
centre. There have been systematic literature reviews that have analysed the. You can begin by
describing the search results, and then move on to the study range and characteristics, study quality,
how to write a systematic review paper, and finally discuss the effect of the intervention on the
outcome. It contains a briefing note on literature review including definition, elements, strategies,
and its types. In a critical review, the reviewer not only summarizes the existing literature, but also
evaluates its strengths and weaknesses. Select studies per protocol The screening of studies should
be performed by 2 reviewers. The protocol needs to be submitted to the journal along with your
manuscript. Journal of experimental criminology, 10, 487-513. The Institute of Medicine
recommends partnering with a librarian when developing your search strategy. Here’s a free detailed
template for recording data extraction, from Dalhousie University. Plenty of information mentioned
years ago remains relevant, so it’s better not to miss it.
In this case, devote most of your space to explaining the connections between sources, but you must
also include a thesis and a conclusion, even though they will be brief. Likewise, a synthesis of the
evidence for public health control within endemic populations is also lacking. Try to place your
current work and research within this wider discussion by considering how your research supports,
contradicts, or departs from other scholars’ research. Results: The Results section should also be
explained logically. Strong professional language and vocabulary should be used. Sign up via email.
Subscribe to Conducting Research. Like other literature reviews, historiographies can be embedded
or stand-alone. Writing a literature review requires research, analysis, and synthesis. Systematic
Literature Review Of Templates For Reporting Literature review template the following is a simple
pattern to follow for writing up your systematic literature review. Fifth, situate your own research
within the current literature in your field. It helps in topic refining, refocusing, and changing the
ongoing discussions. It begins with the simple inclusion of a title and abstract, and goes on to outline
the introduction, methods, results, and discussion portions of your report. SLRs may be quantitative
(by only reviewing quantitative studies), qualitative (by only reviewing qualitative studies), or mixed
methods (by reviewing both quantitative and qualitative studies). Communications of the
Association of Information Systems, 37 (43), 879-910. Frequently Asked Questions about writing a
systematic literature review. For example, scholars who published in the 1960s interpreted a
historical event differently than those who published in the early 2000s. The role of
sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT) in SSTI treatment, particularly when group A Streptococcus
(GAS) is involved, is controversial. Systematic literature reviews are often found in clinical or
healthcare settings. The proper sequence allows moving from one question to another, avoiding
chaos in writing. E.g., a body part in the standard literature review samples often is organized
chronologically, moving from the older findings to the newest research. Preferred reporting items for
systematic reviews and meta analyses. Use specific authors or sources as examples, and be sure to
explain any similarities or departures in approach, methodology, findings, or argument. Reviewers
should keep a log of excluded studies, including the reason they were omitted. Because most
historical writing uses the Chicago Manual of Style as a reference system, most historiographies will
also require you to use the Chicago Manual of Style. These tools can create bibliographies, remove
duplicate records, and share citations with a team. Be sure to include some background information
on the actual topic in the introduction. A systematic review is how to write a systematic review
paper highly rigorous review of existing literature that addresses a clearly formulated question. A
classic systematic literature review can take different approaches: Effectiveness reviews assess the
extent to which a medical intervention or therapy achieves its intended effect. A systematic review
article follows the same structure as that of an original research article. Systematic reviews are
absolutely crucial in the field of evidence-based medicine, but are also highly valued in other fields.
We like that! Why don't we give you complete access.