002gage LocusClassicusColour 1981
002gage LocusClassicusColour 1981
002gage LocusClassicusColour 1981
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/751049?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Warburg Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes
John Gage
WRITING IN 1637 to Franciscus Junius, Rubens praised the diligence with which
the author of De Pictura Veterum had gathered together 'all the examples, opinions
and precepts relating to the dignity and honour of the art of painting, which have
been preserved, widely scattered among ancient writings, to this day and to our own great
advantage'. 'But', continued Rubens,
since those examples of the ancient painters can now be followed only in our individual
imaginations, I could wish that a similar treatise on the paintings of the Italian masters might be
extracted and compiled with like care. For examples of their work are still publicly exhibited today;
we may point to them and say, 'there they are'. Those things which are perceived by the senses
produce a sharper and more durable impression, require a closer examination, and afford a richer
material for study than those which are offered to our imagination alone, like dreams; being
sketched out in words, they are 'thrice grasped in vain' (like Eurydice's shade by Orpheus), and
often escape to disappoint us in our hope. This we say from experience; for how few among us, in
attempting an adequate reproduction of some famous work of Apelles or Timanthes that is
graphically described by Pliny or by other authors, will not produce something insipid or
inconsistent with the grandeur of the ancients?'
The painter's appeal to practical experience over and against literary imagination must
also strike a sympathetic chord in those many who have addressed the ungrateful task of
reconstructing the history of Greek painting on the basis of little more than documents;
but in singling out Apelles and Timanthes, Rubens chose exemplars whose posthumous
reputations had taken, and were to continue to take, a far from purely literary form. This
was especially true in the case of Apelles, whose extraordinary financial and social
successes, and his remarkable gift for defending himself against ignorant criticism from
both the humble and the great,2 made him a natural hero to later painters, who celebrated
the more favourable episodes of his life in many pictures between the sixteenth and the
nineteenth centuries.3 His most elaborate attempt at riposte, the Calumny, described by
Lucian, and the only known example of a painted satire in Antiquity, was also re-
interpreted repeatedly, both as a visual image and in literature, from the Renaissance
onwards.4 But Apelles had more to offer his admirers than an enviable example and a
* My greatest debt is to David Cast and Jean-Michel 2 Most of the literary sources for Apelles have been
Massing for many helpful suggestions. I also owe crucial gathered and translated by A.-J. Reinach, Textes grecs et
information to B. Cook, Alex Potts, Oliver Logan, Jon latins relatifs ai l'histoire de la peinture ancienne (Recueil
Whiteley, Philip Conisbee and the late Professor Edgar Milliet), 1921, nos. 40o-86. The fullest discussion of his
Wind. career is W. Lepik-Kopaczyfiska, Apelles, der beriihmteste
Maler der Antike, 1963, which uses these sources rather
1 M. Rooses and C. Reulens, Correspondence de Rubens,
uncritically.
2nd edn, 1975, VI, no. DCCCXXXI. My translation is based
on P. P. Rubens, Letters, trans. R. Magurn, 2nd edn, 3 A listing of many examples in A. Pigler, Barock-
1971, p. 407, and E. McGrath, 'The Painted Decorationthemen, 2nd edn, I974, PP. 366 ff. See also E. Kris & 0.
of Rubens's House', this Journal, XLI, 1978, pp. 245 f.
Kurz, Die Legende vom Kiinstler, 1934, PP. 49 f.
Junius approved sufficiently of the letter, which Rubens 4 The most recent study, with the earlier literature, is
had prudently composed partly in Latin as well as D.inCast, The Calumny of Apelles: A Study in the Humanist
Flemish, to print it as an introduction to the Dutch Tradition, I98 i.
edition of his book (Middelburg 1641).
Four colours only - white from Milos, Attic yellow, red from Sinope
black called atramentum - were used by Apelles, Aetion, Melanthiu
immortal works; illustrious artists, a single one of whose pictures the we
suffice to buy, while now that even purple clothes our walls, and India
rivers and the blood of dragons and of elephants, no famous picture is p
that when the painters' equipment was less complete, the results were i
... we are alive only to the worth of the material and not the genius of th
The law of proportion, however, according to which the several colours are formed, even if a m
knew, he would be foolish in telling, for he could not give any necessary reason, nor indeed an
tolerable or probable explanation of them.
And none of the mixtures listed in this passage is, strictly, inter-chromatic: all are ma
through the use of 'lighteners' or 'darkeners', elements with which Greek scientists fe
themselves to be rather more at home. In the second century A.D. Aulus Gellius report
an interesting discussion between the philosopher Favorinus and the ex-consul Fronto,
the subject of Greek and Latin colour-terms, which reveals the prevailing vaguen
about basic colours and mixtures. The simple colours were, following Democritus,
(rufus) and green. Fulvus (which was classified as a type of red) was a mixture of red a
green, andflavus (also regarded by Fronto as a red) of red, green and white.41 Bothfulv
Terminologie
35 Shore, op. cit. n. 32 above, pl. 8 (NG. 2912); cf. also der Gewerbe und Kiinste bei den Griechen und
NG. 3139 (Shore, pl. I6). Rimer, Iv, 1887, pp. 459 ff., and contested by Berger, op.
36 Natural History, xxI, 85; xxxv, 49. I. Scheibler cit. n. 9 above, pp. 173 ff., who showed convincingly that
also
there
suggests that the encaustic painters' palette was farwas no substantial evidence for such use. For the
paintboxes of the Egyptians, where colours were
brighter than that of the 'four-colour' artists ('Die "Vier
Farben" der griechischen Malerei', Antike Kunst,ready-mixed
xvii, before use, with separate brushes for each
I974, PP. 92 ff.). For the use of glazes in encaustic,
colour, Forbes, op. cit. n. I8 above, pp. 244 f.
Berger, op. cit. n. 9 above, pp. 206 ff.; Schmid, op.40
cit.
Bruno, op. cit. n. I I above, pp. 89 ff. The first Latin
translation
n. 33 above, pp. 86 f. I have not been able to consult E. of this chapter of the Timaeus (by Marsilio
Berger, Die Wachsmalerei des Apelles und seiner Zeit,Ficino),
1917, interpreted the terms in a similar way, making a
but from Schmid's critique (pp. 77-78, 85) it appears distinction between niger and nigredo, and characterizing
that it added little to his earlier study. xanthon as yellow (flavus) (Plato, Opera Omnia, Venice
7 G. Loumyer, Traditions techniques de la peinture medie'-
I581, p. 4I5)-
vale, 1914, pp. 147 ff. 41 Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae, II, xxvi. Diirbeck, op.
38 K. Weitzmann, The Monastery of St. Catherine cit. at
n. 12 above, pp. 38 ff., in the only substantial modern
commentary
Mount Sinai: The Icons, 1976, nos. BI, B2, B3, B5, B9, on this passage, has translated viridis as
BIo, BI6, BI7. 'yellow' to accommodate the sense.
39 The evidence for the use of the palette in ancient
painting was assembled by H. Bliimner, Technologie und
46 A. M. Hind, Early Italian Engraving, 1938, v, no. 29. 48 L. Ghiberti, I Commentari, ed. O. Morisani, 1947,
Hind gives the fullest published account of this mysteri- p. 24.
ous figure (pp. o107 ff.). The figure of Apelles seems to 49 Cf. Geometria, in the Tarocchi series (Hind, loc. cit. n.
depend on that of the philosopher in Filippino Lippi's 46 above, pl. 343) and the tablet at the foot of the
Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas in S. Maria sopra Minerva astrologer in the 1524 Venice edition of Cecco d'Ascoli,
in Rome (A. Scharf, Filippino Lippi, 1950, fig. 76), which Acerba (repr. Gazette des Beaux-Arts, vIme ser, xxvII, 1945,
may allow us to date the print between 1507, when p. 209).
Nicoletto is documented in that city, and 1515, when
50 Aitius, Plac. II, 6, Dox. 334; Hermias, Irrisio Genti-
records of him cease. lium Philosophorum, 16, Dox. 655, both in M. C. Nahm,
47 For the broken column as representing fortezza in from Early Greek Philosophy, 4th edn, 1964, p. 59.
Selections
the Mantegnesque repertory, from which Nicoletto 5s Ed. Winterberg, 1889, pp. 84-85. Pacioli attributes
the notion to Plato, basing himself probably on a rather
drew so many of his graphic ideas, E. Wind, Giorgione's
vague reference in Timaeus 55c.
'Tempesta', 1969, pp. 2, I8-I9. See also Fabio Segni's
phrase in his early I6th-century epigram on Botticelli's
Calumny; 'Terrarum Reges parva tabula monet' (G.
Vasari, Le Vite ... , Milan 1963, I, p. 204).
Spring = red
Summer = yellow
Autumn = black
Winter = white.
Thus we are presented about 1500 with a number of apparently arbitrary and conflictin
attempts to establish analogies, to accommodate a fluctuating range of'basic' colours and
shapes to the more firmly established number of elements and seasons. No clear reasons
for preferring one colour to another had yet emerged, probably because there was still
remarkably little interest in that aspect of colour which we regard as the most importa
one, namely hue.61 It seems clear that, ifNicoletto's portrait ofApelles was understood t
refer primarily to the four-colour palette, his public would have been hard put to it to
identify which these colours were, even with the help of Pliny's story.
2*
66 R. F6rster, 'Die 69
Verliumdung
Diirer, op. cit. n. 64 above, I, p. 289; 11, pp. 393des
f.; Apell
Renaissance', Jahrbuch (cf. ibid.
der II, pp. 94Preussischen
ff.) Diirer's note is hardly the chapter Kunstsam
on colourDiirer's
vIII, 1887, pp. 93 f. For itself, as claimed by W. ownJ. Hofmann,Calumny
Uber f
Nuremberg Town Hall, Diirer,
Diirers Farbe, 1971, op. cit. n. 64
p. 17. D. B. Kuspit, '"Melanchthon
p. 267. The sketch isand Winckler
Diirer": the search for the Simple no.Style', Journal
922; of the pa
probably executed by Georg
Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies,Pencz.
III, 1973, pp. I88 f., Erasmu
1518 of the response shows thatto this andhisrelated remarks
earlier reported by Mel- edition;
mihi quidem adversus anchthon form part of the humanist's
istorum argument in
calumnias suff
mus bene sibi conscius favour of the...
simple'style(Erasmi
in language. Epistolae,
no. 809), Cf. also the70 Epistolae, Apologia cit. ni, 503 f.; vi, pp. 16
forf. and letterthe
1544. 1518/
p. 82. 71 C. Ridolfi, Le Meraviglie dell'Arte, 1648, ed. Hadeln,
67 Epistolae, cit., nos 1398 (1523) 1536, 1558 (1525)- 1914, I, p. 107. Giorgione's epitaph (ibid.) makes the
68 Diirer, op. cit. n. 64 above, I, p. 297. The fullest standard reference to Apelles and Zeuxis as his peers.
commentary on this text is in E. Panofsky '"Nebulae in
Pariete": Notes on Erasmus' Eulogy of Diirer', this
Journal, xIv, 1951.
78 A. F. Doni, 82
Disegno, There1549:
Venice is no on
discussion
colours,
on flesh-painting, Paolo
pp. 9v, Pino, Dialogo
I4v; on di
Apelles P
(an
pp. 37V ff. For a brief Pino, as a
account painter,
of was
Doni's career,
op. cit. n. 76 above, pp.nique, admired Titian, a
49 ff.
Apelles. and
79 M. Roskill, Dolce's 'Aretino' NorVenetian
is it especia
Art
the Cinquecento, 1968, nichi in the On
pp. 152-53. commentar
p. 299 Ro
this with Apelles's dark (Venice,
varnish,1561),
which althoug
is also r
as bruno in the lettererences
of G. B.to contemporary
Adriani to Vasar
For other referencesedn, 1573, pp.
to Apelles: io87,
pp. II
164-67
been174-75.
148-49, 150-51, 156-57, close to Doni in the
so Thylesius, op. cit.above,
in J. pp.
W. 52 ff.,
von 66 ff.
Goethe, op
83 T. Borenius,
above, p. I 18; Dolce, Dialogo The Pictur
... dei colori, 156
where he also suggested1923, pp.
that 12 ff.; Lodovicu
painters still use
de pictura,
white of Milo. He referred in Vitruvius,
to Thylesius's book
8s Thylesius, op. cit. p. I II;
Antwerp Dolce,
1649, op.
pt III, ci
pp.
above, p. 7r. Dolce also refers to Titian on
64v. For a brief account of Dolce, Grendler, op
above, pp. 65 ff.
87 See especially the list of thirteen colours in a I2th-clearly an error, some earlier editors have emended the
century Anglo-Norman MS of the Mappae Clavicula,reading Pliniam to physicam.
published by H. Roosen-Runge, Farbgebung und Technik 89 The Craftsman's Handbook, Ch. xxxvI. The division
friihmittelalterlicher Buchmalerei, 1967, I, pp. 185 ff. and theof pigments into 'natural' and 'artificial' is an ancient
glossary in vol. ii. A slightly amplified copy with fifteenone, but for Vitruvius (vii, vii) the 'natural colours' were
colours is in the 14th-century French (?) Liber de colori-yellow-ochre (sil), red ochre, minium, white, green and
bus, published by D. V. Thompson, Speculum, I, 1926, yellow (orpiment). His epitomiser, Faventinus (c. 300
p. 288. The 15th-century Portuguese Livro de como seA.D.) omits sil, but adds the blues chrysocolla, armenium
and indicum (De diversis fabricis architectonicae, ?27, trans.
fazen as CUres, lists ten cores principaes, most of them the
names of pigments (Portuguese text in Todd memorialW. H. Plommer in Vitruvius and Later Roman Building
Volumes, I, 1930, p. 8o; translation by D. S. Blondheim,Manuals, 1973, PP. 74 ff.) For the medieval interest in
Jewish Quarterly Review, xIx, 1928-29, P. 130.) M. F.Faventinus, in the context of pigments, K. W. Grans-
Edgerton points out that the word color in a 15th-centuryden, 'The Interpolated Text of the Vitruvian Epitome',
German Tractatus de Coloribus usually refers to a colour-this journal, xx, 1957, p. 370. For Michelangelo Biondo,
ing agent, rather than to a concept (Mediaeval Studies,Della nobilissima pittura, 1549, P. 21r, the 'natural' colours
xxv, 1963, p. 194). An exception to this general rule is in were blue, red, yellow and green, plus black and white.
the I3th-century additions to Eraclius de coloribus et artibus 9o For example, Mario Equicola, Libro di natura
romanorum, ?50: De diversis colorum principalium et interme-d'amore, 1526, in P. Barocchi (ed.) Scritti d'arte del Cin-
diorum speciebus ..., which lists black and white in quecento, uI, 1973, P. 2153; F. P. Morato, Del significato dei
several varieties, and then the intermediaries, rubeus, colori, 1535, in ibid. p. 2176. Cf. Also R. Borghini, II
viridis, croceus, purpureus, prasinus, azur and indicus, only Riposo, 1584, p. 230.
the last of which is clearly a pigment, although the list 91 C. Parkhurst, 'Camillo Leonardi and the Green-
includes two blues and two greens (M. Merrifield, Blue Shift in Sixteenth-century Painting', in Intuition und
Original Treatises ... on the Arts of Painting, I, I849, pp.
Kunstwissenschaft, Festschrift fuir H. Swarzenski, ed. P.
244-45). Bloch et al., 1973, esp. p. 425.
88 De arte illuminandi, ed. Brunello, 1975, PP. 36 ff.
Since the attribution of a three-colour theory to Pliny is
For it is certain that these four colours, white, black, red and blue, are the fewest that are neede
painting, and from a mixture of which all the others are composed.98
However, Montjosieu went on to list a number of mixtures which may cast doubt upon
practical experience; we may accept his grey (cineraceus) composed of black and white,
his brown (fulvus) made from red and black, but his green is a mixture of red and blue,
his yellow (luteus) a mixture of green and red, which suggests that he was still thinking v
much in Classical terms, for there is no suggestion that he was concerned with op
mixture, which might conceivably produce these results.99 What is important for us i
that Montjosieu stressed the dependence of all colours upon these basic four, that Atti
(as opposed to other types ofsil, which might be purple or yellow) is always blue, and
his views were several times re-published, and widely read, during the sixteenth
seventeenth centuries.
For the several accounts of the primary colours which appeared about I6oo, and
which established the modern subtractive triad of red, yellow and blue, appealed to the
experience of mixture in painting, although for the most part they were written by
Yet Hagedorn was writing at a period when the setting of the palette was still a thoroughly
organized affair, and its range of pigments was far from restricted to four. How did the
artists of the eighteenth century imagine that Apelles has set his? The Renaissance
interpreters of the theme of Calumny had given no sign that they were anxious to follow
Apelles in respect of colour; they made, for example, an abundant use of blue.108 Several
artists of the early eighteenth century who showed Apelles at work were also happy to
represent him essentially as one of themselves. In an Allegory of Painting in the Mostyn-
Owen collection, Sebastiano Conca showed Apelles painting Campaspe as Venus, and
his palette seems to be set for flesh with only reds, yellow and white, but there is blue in the
picture on his canvas, as well as in other parts of Conca's scene.109 A similar subject by
Francesco Trevisani (Pasadena, Norton Simon Museum of Art) also presents Apelles
with a far from restricted palette, including vermilion, as does G. B. Tiepolo in two
versions of Alexander and Campaspe in the studio of Apelles. Apelles's palette in the later
version, in the Louvre (c. 1735-40), is set in the standard eighteenth-century sequence
from white, near the thumbhole, through yellows and reds, to black, a total of six colours,
including vermilion.110
104 R. de Piles, Abrege'de la vie des peintres, 1699, pp. 131, 109 Colour-plate in Apollo, LxxvI, 1962, p. 397.
257-58. In his Cours de peinture par principes, I7o8, p. 352, 110 The Trevisani is reproduced in colour in The Con-
De Piles concluded that the four colours could only benoisseur, cxcmi, 1976, p. 209, and the earlier, Montreal
an underpainting, which would then have been finishedversion of the Tiepolo subject in A. Morassi, G. B.
in the lighter colours he called 'aerial'. Tiepolo, 1955, pl. iiu. For the Louvre picture, A. Morassi,
105 Histoire de la peinture ancienne extraite de l'HistoireG. B. Tiepolo: A Complete Catalogue of the Paintings, 1962,
naturelle de Pline Liv. XXXV, 1725, p. 44. p. 38, fig. 284. The most useful study of the setting of
106 C. L. von Hagedorn, Reflixions sur la peinture, 1775, palettes from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries is
1, p. 201. The original German edition dates from 1762.F. Schmid, The Practice of Painting, 1948. The absence of
107 Ibid. pp. 202 f. Anxious to save the probability of blue was a standard feature in 18th-century palettes for
Pliny's story, Hagedorn also stressed that it could onlyflesh-painting, yet Anton Raphael Mengs's pupil,
apply to flesh-painting, since there was clear evidence inDaniel Webb, cast doubt on the authenticity of Pliny's
Pliny (xxxiii, I I) and in the paintings of Herculaneum, story precisely because he felt that the four colours cited
that blue was used by the ancients (pp. 201, 204). were incapable of forming 'a perfect carnation' (D.
108 For a colour-plate of Botticelli's Calumny, in theWebb, An Inquiry into the Beauties of Painting, 1760,
Uffizi, L. Venturi, Botticelli, 2nd edn, 1971, pl. 42. See p. 8o0 n.).
also the colour notes in R. F6rster, op. cit. n. 66 above,
PP. 35 if., 45-46, 48-49.
As to Blake's system of colouring . . . it was in many instances most beautifully prismatic. In this
branch of the art he often acknowledged Apelles to have been his tutor, who was, he said, so much
pleased with his style, that once when he appeared before him, among many of his observations he
delivered the following: 'You certainly possess my system of colouring; and I now wish you to draw
my person, which has hitherto been untruly delineated'.124
It is not easy to date Blake's ostensible encounter with Apelles; he alludes to the
competition with Protogenes in the Descriptive Catalogue of 1809, and also in the Notebook,
which was in use at many periods from the late I780s.125 But the 'prismatic' palette,
which was apparently the product of this encounter, can be recognized in the water-
colours prepared for Thomas Butts in 1803, and in his letter to this patron of the previous
November, Blake showed that he had made an extensive study of Reynolds's writings,
where he will have found the discussion of the palette of the Ancients reviewed above. The
lesson which he claimed to draw from Reynolds' Discourses, and which he reinforced in his
later Marginalia to Reynolds's Literary Works, was that the 'broken' colour of the Venetians
was injurious to grandeur, which could only be the product of simplicity. 126 But it is not at
all clear how far Blake took Apelles's message to be a serious recomendation of the
restricted palette: the very florid tonality of many of the later illuminations, with their
frequent use of gold, suggests that austerity was certainly never a constant aesthetic with
him, and the technique of even the simplest of the late watercolours, the Dante series,
makes a good deal of play with mixed and 'broken' tints. Blake's early biographer,
Alexander Gilchrist, described his pigments as 'few and simple', but went on to list five of
them, including cobalt blue, which the painter would supplement occasionally with
ultramarine, gamboge and vermilion; and the palette of the figure of Painting in the Enoch
lithograph of 1821 shows a range of six.127 It must remain debatable how far Blake's
123 D. Bindman, Blake as an Artist, 1977, PP. 125 ff.fig. 166 and pp. 161-63, suggests a date-bracket of
124 G. E. Bentley, Jr, Blake Records, 1969, p. 468. c. I803-20, pointing out that the print is not strictly a
lithograph, but a relief-etching on stone, a 'hybrid'
Blake's portrait of Apelles may be identifiable with the
well known drawing of The Man who Taught Blake Painting technique first published in 182o. Although the design
does bear some relationship to an early watercolour of
in his Dreams (c. 1818; collection of Sir Geoffrey Keynes),
for which see M. Butlin, The Paintings and Drawings Enoch
of (Butlin, op. cit., n. 124 above, no. 146), the
William Blake, 1981, no. 753. subject seems to be that of chapter 92 of The Book of
Enoch, first translated in 1821, where the prophet
125 Poetry and Prose, cit. n. 22 above, p. 617, and p. 590,
where Apelles and Protogenes are characterized as 'fre-
addressed his children on the subject of his vision 'from
sco' painters. The Notebook of William Blake, ed. D. Erd-
a book' (The Book ofEnoch the Prophet, trans. R. Laurence,
man, 1973, p. 32: 'Ghiottos circle or Apelles line were1821, ch. xcii, vols 1-3 (p. 134); cf. also ch. civ, vols I, io
not the work of Sketchers drunk with wine'. (pp. 154-56)). Painting, poetry and music, 'the three
126 For a discussion of the letter to Butts, and of thePowers of Man in conversing with Paradise', were
colour of these watercolours, Bindman, op. cit. n. 123 personified by Enoch's grandson Noah, and his great-
above, pp. 136 ff. For the Marginalia, Poetry and Prose, grandsons Shem and Japhet in Blake's Vision of the last
cit. n. 22 above, esp. pp. 791 ff. Judgement of 18o0 (Poetry & Prose, cit., n. 23 above,
p. 643). For slight pencil sketches connected with the
127 A. Gilchrist, Life of W. Blake, ed. Todd, 1942, p. 6o.
The Enoch is reproduced in D. Bindman, The Complete Enoch print, Butlin, op. cit., no. 582 (given to c. 1807),
Graphic Works of W. Blake, 1978, no. 413, and dated and for the series of drawings illustrating The Book of
c. 1806-I2. R. N. Essick, William Blake Printmaker, 198o,Enoch (dated c. 1824-27), ibid. no. 827.
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY
128 C. LUnormant, Girard, peintre d'histoire, 2nd edn, Romanticism circa I8oo', Burlington Magazine, cxviiin,
1847, p. 55, cit. J. H. Rubin, 'New Documents on the 1975, PP. 787-89.
Meditateurs: Baron Gerard, Mantegna and French