Handling Out of Specification
Handling Out of Specification
During the course of a drug or drug product’s development and as the product is nearing
completion, it needs to be tested to ensure that it performs as expected, within the specified limits
as mentioned in the compendia, drug master file, or drug application. When it does not and falls
outside the specified limits, it is said to be OOS or out of specification. If this happens often, it is
an indication of the manufacturing and analytical procedures not being in control. It can lead to
frequent customer complaints and the rejection of commercial batches. As a result, the
pharmaceutical business will face a heavy inventory loss. It may also compromise the safety of
patients and their handlers. Therefore, any incident of OOS result occurrence must be
investigated and the root cause addressed.
Typically, the specified limits are detailed in documents such as the compendia, drug master file,
or drug application. This happens right at the product design stage after the product has been
conceptualized and the details of the nature of the product, its goals, and the raw materials to be
used are specified. The testing criteria are also laid down at this stage, explaining how the
product should be tested and who will be testing it.
From the time of design to the time of manufacturing, the design undergoes several
changes. Due to these changes or due to process errors, deviations may be introduced at
the time of manufacturing too, this can cause Out of Specification. Some of the common
factors of Out of Specification (OOS) include:
Deviations during the product manufacturing process
Errors during testing due to incorrect procedure
Errors caused by malfunctioning analytical equipment
Therefore, to understand whether the error is due to the product not conforming to the
specifications or other factors, a root cause analysis must be performed to identify the
true cause. The OOS causes can be classified as
Assignable: When the error is identified.
Non-assignable: When the error is not identified.
Out-of-Specification (OOS) is a critical term frequently used in the field of life sciences, particularly in
pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and other regulated industries. This glossary provides an in-depth
understanding of OOS, its significance, causes, investigation processes, and regulatory implications
within the context of life sciences.
The significance of OOS findings lies in their potential impact on patient safety, product quality, and
regulatory compliance. Identifying and appropriately addressing OOS results are crucial steps in
maintaining the integrity of products, ensuring patient well-being, and complying with stringent
regulatory requirements.
1. Analytical Errors
OOS results can arise due to analytical errors associated with the methods, instruments, or techniques
used during testing. Issues such as inadequate method validation, instrument malfunctions, improper
sample preparation, or human errors can introduce variability and inaccuracies, leading to OOS findings.
2. Sampling Errors
Errors related to sampling, such as improper sample collection, handling, or preparation, can contribute to
OOS situations. Inadequate sampling techniques, insufficient sample quantities, contamination during
sampling, or improper sample storage conditions can all impact the reliability and accuracy of test results.
3. Environmental Factors
Variations in environmental conditions, such as temperature, humidity, or light exposure, can affect the
stability and integrity of life science products. These factors may lead to degradation, alteration, or loss of
potency, resulting in OOS results.
To ensure compliance, companies in the life sciences industry are required to establish robust quality
management systems, including thorough documentation, data integrity measures, proper investigation
processes, and adherence to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and other regulatory guidelines.
Summary
Out-of-Specification (OOS) findings in the life sciences industry signify results falling outside the defined
acceptance criteria or specifications. Recognizing and appropriately addressing OOS results are crucial to
maintain the quality and safety of life science products and comply with stringent regulatory
requirements. Thorough investigation processes, including root cause analysis, repeat testing, and OOT
analysis, facilitate the identification of underlying causes and the implementation of corrective and
preventive actions. Compliance with regulatory reporting and handling procedures is essential to ensure
regulatory compliance and maintain the trust and safety of patients and consumers.
Handling Out of Specification (OOS) and Out of Trend (OOT) is of utmost importance to Pharma sector.
Pharma companies should be aware of these two terms exhaustively. They need to perform stability tests
at regular intervals to find the status of the samples of raw materials, in-process materials, bulk products,
and finished products.
Issues with Manual Process Followed for Tracing OOS and OOT
The process of finding Out of Specification (OOS) and Out of Trend (OOT) through manual procedures
is quite a herculean task. It involves a lot of paperwork. The test will be first conducted by a QA and
manually noted down. Then, the reviewer receives the test result and goes through all the steps again to
suggest the next step. He may raise investigation to find the reason for OOS or OOT. Another analyst
may finally receive the sample for investigation purposes. This analyst also must repeat all the steps of
testing and note down everything manually. Thus, leaving a lot of scope for transcriptional errors and
compliance issues.
Further, in some companies, the production team may send a batch of raw materials or finished goods for
production or sale even before completing the investigation for an OOS or OOT. This can lead to serious
problems when an auditor requests for all the investigation documents of OOS or OOT. The auditor can
question the reason for taking the next step without stringently complying with the FDA regulations.