NOC Vs SOC What Is The Difference
NOC Vs SOC What Is The Difference
In the vast world of cybersecurity, terms often overlap, and it’s easy to blur the lines between them. You’ve
likely encountered the terms NOC and SOC, and maybe you’ve even thought of them as interchangeable
buzzwords. But they’re not, each of them have their own roles and responsibilities within organizations.
Should your organization have a NOC or SOC? How can your organization integrate both the NOC and SOC?
Let’s dig deeper into both of these components, unraveling their similarities and differences. But more
importantly, we’ll explore how they influence decision-making and the overall operations of organizations.
Types of NOCs
The network security operations center in cybersecurity varies according to how it’s implemented by the
organization. After a detailed cost-benefit analysis, companies are bound to choose from the two types of
NOCs:
In-house NOCs: Some companies prefer to handle the administration of networks directly. In-house
NOCs oversee the network operation by allocating an internal team. With this, organizations spend
additional resources and costs to have full control of the networks.
Outsourced NOCs: Another option for network management is hiring a vendor to supervise network
operations. Outsourcing a NOC means there’s no need to hire internal employees. This gives companies
a broader scope of talents for a specific function. More so, outsourced NOCs allow the organization to
prioritize core business objectives.
NOCs focus on the core network capabilities, from installing software to troubleshooting system issues. It
ensures uninterrupted service through a unified administration of networks and devices.
2. Minimal Downtime
NOCs provide a wide-range of capabilities, including specific functions, continuous network supervision, and
quick resolution of incidents. As a result, it minimizes downtime in case of network issues.
NOCs work hand in hand with the SOC team to protect the network from breaches. NOCs regulate firewalls
and other related security features.
4. Data Protection
In relation to security operations, a NOC contributes to data protection. It makes use of key security techniques
to defend network assets against threats.
As companies create a dedicated team to work on network functions and obstacles, it leads to a more
streamlined organization. In this sense, companies can achieve other key goals.
If the organization opts for in-house, setting a budget and hiring employees are two pivotal factors. It’s
important to create a budget that fits the operational structure and define the core designations and
responsibilities of the NOC team.
On the contrary, companies that outsource NOC services are given more leeway, especially with the
management of the team. Third-party NOC providers work on complex processes, including onboarding, to
ensure a seamless NOC incorporation.
SOC is mainly responsible for the protection against threats and different types of cyber security attacks. One of
the noteworthy elements of SOC is the application of incident detection, response and analysis.
They also meet in terms of tools used such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and vulnerability scanners.
However, they significantly differ in their main goal. NOC revolves around the ins and outs of IT infrastructure,
while SOC is more on the security of the organization.
Vulnerability scanning
Threat detection
Security installation and management
Incident response and recovery
Forensic analysis
In this case, it’s crucial to fully understand the difference between NOC and SOC. Essential factors that you
need to consider before merging the two operations include:
Fundamentally different objectives: NOC gives importance to network connectivity and regulation
time. SOC, on the other hand, puts effort into handling cyberattacks. At its core, each center works
collaboratively but functions differently. That’s why it’s a must to determine the capabilities where both
NOC and SOC overlap. From there, create processes that address the main duties of network
management and security administration.
Cross-team capabilities: Since only one team will be working on the NOC and SOC services, it’s
critical to evaluate the ability of the team to handle a more extensive scope of responsibilities. This leads
to another challenge, which is choosing the right set of professionals.
Extra load of tasks: With only one team to work on major network and security functions, this can have
a negative bearing on the staff. The added load can further affect employee satisfaction and retention in
the long run.
Overall processing time: Because of the integration of functions ― both similar and distinct ― there
might be an impact on the lead times. There might be faster remediation on some tasks while others may
take some time to be completed.
Communication challenges: The broader control processes can cause communication issues across the
team. For this reason, it’s vital to establish the scope and delegate tasks accordingly.
Selection of common tools: Integrating two teams reduces the costs of resources. However, the
challenge lies in the selection of the toolsets. Invest in powerful resources that are relevant to both NOC
and SOC. Choose a reliable platform that extends visibility and actionability in network operation and
security infrastructure.
The Transition from NOC to SOC
Another option that is gaining traction among IT organizations is the modernization of NOC into SOC. This
approach is the same as integrating both NOC and SOC but from a different lens.
In general, this might be tough for most companies, where networks and security have a specific set of
objectives and functions. However, when automation is integrated into the entire security organization, the
transition from NOC to SOC becomes manageable as well as preferable. Automation simplifies all manual tasks
and repetitive functions. It further improves the turnaround time when responding to network issues and
security threats.